The feasible generation of entangled spin-1 state using linear optical element XuBo Zou, K. Pahlke and W. Mathis Institute TET, University of Hannover, Appelstr. 9A, 30167 Hannover, Germany Abstract We firstly present a feasible scheme to produce entangled spin-1 photon states from Fock state. The scheme requires only linear optical element and photon detector. The probability of success of method is relatively low. We further give a scheme to show that, if two maximally entangled photon state is prepared in advance, the probability of success can be improved. PACS number:03.65.ud,4.50.dv,03.67.-a The generation of entangled state occupies a central position in quantum optics. Popular candidate for experimental investigation in this context include trapped ions[1], Cavity QED[] and Bose-Einstein condenses[3]. Many scheme has been proposed for the purpose of generating entanglement between atoms[4]. In fact, the GHZ state of many particles have been controllably produced in the trapped ion and atom cavity system[5, ]. Currently, experiments with photon entanglement has opened a whole field of research. Such photon entanglement has been used to test bell inequality[6] and implement quantum information protocols like quantum teleportation[7], quantum dense coding[8] and quantum cryptography[9]. More recently, experimental GHZ state of three or four photons has also been reported[10]. Remarkably, efficient quantum computation with linear optics has been put forward[13]. Such scheme can directly be used to generate the photon polarization entanglement. In this proposals, a sequence of beam splitter is arranged carefully to implement basic non deterministic gate. More recently, a feasible linear optical scheme is[14] proposed to produce photon polarization entanglement with the help of single-photon quantum nondemolition measurement based on atom-cavity system[15]. In recent paper[16], we propose a scheme to generate entangled N photon state of the form 1 ( 0,N >+ N,0 >) via linear optical element. Recently, there are increasing interest in the study of entangled state of spin-s objects (S >1/), which, apart from its fundamental interest[17, 18], are of clear interest for application in quantum information such as quantum cryptography[19] due to higher dimensional Hilbert space associated to these states. Experimental violation of a spin-1 bell inequality has been reported by using polarization entangled four photon state of pulsed parameter down conversion, which is formally equivalent to two maximally entangled spin-1 particle[0]. In practice, such polarization entangled photon state have only been produced randomly, since we have no way of telling that polarization entanglement was produced without measuring(and hence destroying) the outgoing state. In this paper, we propose a scheme to generate entangled spin-1 photon states of the 1
form Ψ >= 1 (, 0,, 0 > 1, 1, 1, 1 > + 0,, 0, >) (1) using linear optical element. Consider the experiment shown schematically in Fig.1. A pair of photon in mode 1 and mode, are incident on a symmetric Beam Splitter BS 1. The initial state of the system is 1 > 1 1 >,Here m > i denotes the Fock state of the ith mode. After the Beam Splitter, the state become Ψ 1 >= 1 (a b ) 0 > 0 > () Let mode a pass through the Beam Splitter BS. The second input port of Beam Splitter BS is assumed to be vacuum state. The auxiliary photons are measured and the outcome is accepted only when no photon is found. Thus the (unnormalized)state is projected into Ψ >= 1 (cos θa b ) 0 > 0 > (3) where cos θ are transimittance of beam splitter which is later determined. Let mode b pass through the Beam Splitter BS 3, whose transformation is given by U = 1 3 3 1 3 3 (4) The second input port of Beam Splitter BS 3 is assumed to be vacuum state in mode d. After passing through BS 3, the (unnormalized)state of the system evolve into Ψ 3 >= 1 (cos θa ( 3 b + 3 b d + 1 3 d )) 0 > 0 > (5) Let mode b pass through the symmetric Beam Splitter BS 4. The second input port of Beam Splitter BS 4 is assumed to be single photon state. The auxiliary photons are measured and the outcome is accepted only when auxiliary photon is found to be single photon state. Thus the (unnormalized)state is projected into Ψ 4 >=[cosθa + 1 3 (b d )] 0 > 0 > (6) Let mode b and d pass through the symmetric Beam Splitter BS 5 and we obtain the state of the system Ψ 5 >=[cosθa + 3 b d ] 0 > 0 > (7) Let mode a pass through the symmetric Beam Splitter BS 6. The second input port of Beam Splitter BS 6 is assumed to be two photon state in mode c. The state of the system evolve into Ψ 6 >=[cosθ(a c ) + 4 3 (a + c ) b d ] 0 > 0 > (8) In order to delete those terms including a and c, we let two spatial seperated photon mode a and c incident on two Beam Splitters BS 7 and BS 8, whose transformation is given by Eq.(4). The second input port of these Beam Splitters BS 7 and BS 8 is assumed to be single photon state produced by single photon source. The auxiliary
photons are measured and the outcome is accepted only when photon is found to be in single photon state. Thus the state is projected into Ψ 7 >=[cos θ(a 4 + c 4 )+a b c d ] 0, 0, 0, 0 > (9) Then two light field of mode a and b is taken as the input to the symmetric beam splitter BS 9 and two light field of mode c and d is taken as the input to the symmetric beam splitterbs 10, state become Ψ 8 >=[(a + b ) 4 +(c + d ) 4 ] 0, 0, 0, 0 > +λ(a b )(c d ) 0, 0, 0, 0 > (10) we let four spatial seperated photon incident on four symmetric Beam Splitters BS 11, BS 1, BS 13 and BS 14. The second input port of these Beam Splitters BS 11 BS 14 is assumed to be single photon state produced by single photon source. The auxiliary photons are measured and the outcome is accepted only when photon is found to be in single photon state. Thus the state is projected into Ψ 9 >=3cos θ[(a b ) +(c d ) ] 0, 0, 0, 0 > +(a b )(c d ) 0, 0, 0, 0 > (11) If we choose parameter cos θ to satisfy cos θ =1/ 6, we have Ψ 10 >=[(a b c + d ) ] 0, 0, 0, 0 > (1) Let mode a, b and c, d incident on two symmetric beam splitter, respectively, we obtain the state Ψ 11 >=[a b c d ) ] 0, 0, 0, 0 >= 1 (, 0;, 0 > 1, 1; 1, 1 > + 0, ; 0, >) (13) which is expected state. The price of using linear optical element is the relatively low yield of the projective process, which is only about 0.5/6 5 for the generation of entangled spin-1 photon states. Of course, the optical scheme we have found so far are not necessary the most efficient ones, so finding the optimal protocols remains an interesting open problem. In what follows, we will show that the probability of success can be improved if a pair of polarization maximally entangled two-photon state is prepared. Recently, experimental GHZ state of three or four photons has also been reported[10] from a pair of polarization entangled two-photon state. We assume that a pair of maximally entangled photon state have been prepared 1 ( H > 1 V > + V > 1 H > )and 1 ( H > 3 V > 4 + V > 3 H> 4 ). The experimental arrangement for our protocol is described by the schematic in Fig.. Let mode H 1 and H 3, V 1 and V 3, H and H 4, V and V 4 pass through four symmetric beam splitters BS i, respectively. The state of the system evolve into Φ >= 1 8 [(a H 1 + a H 3 )(a V + a V 4 )+(a V 1 + a V 3 )(a H + a H 4 )] [(a H 1 a H 3 )(a V a V 4 )+(a V 1 a V 3 )(a H a H 4 )] 0, 0, 0, 0 > (14) If no photons are detected in output modes H 3, V 3, H 4 and V 4, the (unnormalized) state of the system is projected into Φ o >=(a H 1 a V + a V 1 a H ) 0, 0, 0, 0 > (15) which can be rewritten in the form 1 3 ( H > 1 V > + V > 1 H> 1 V > H> + V > 1 H > ), which is equal to the Eq.(1). The probability of success has been 3
improved to the 3/16. Further, if N polarization entangled photon state of the form 1 ( H > V >+ V > H >) are prepared, the above scheme can be easily generalized to generate entangled spin N state of the form 1 N ( NH > 1 NV > + + mh > 1 (N m)v > 1 (N m)h > mv > + + NV > 1 NH > ) In conclusion, we firstly presented a scheme to produce entangled spin-1 photon states from the single photon source. The scheme requires only photon sources, linear optical element and photon detector. The price of using linear optical element is the relatively low yield of the projective process. We show that if the entangled two photon state has been prepared, the probability of success can be improved. Of course, the optical scheme we have found so far are not necessary the most efficient ones, so finding the optimal protocols remains an interesting open problem. One of the difficulties of our scheme in respect to an experimental demonstration is the availability of photon number sources. Another difficulty consists in the requirement on the sensitivity of the detectors. These detectors should be capable of distinguishing between no photon, one photon or more photons. References [1] Q. A. Turchette et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 155 (1998). [] A. Rauschenbeutel et al, Science. 88, 04 (000). [3] A. Sorensen, L. M. Duan, J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller, Nature(London) 409 63 (001); M. G. Moore and P. Meystre, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 506 (000). [4] J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev.50, R799 (1994); T. Pellizzari, S. Gardiner, J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 3788 (1995); J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett.74, 4091 (1995); M. B. Plenio, S. Fi Huegla, A. Bege and P. L. Knight,Phys. Rev.A59, 468(1999). J.I. Bollinger, W.M. Itano, D.J. Wineland, and D.J. Heinzen, Phys. Rev. A 54, R4649 (1996); J. Steinbach and C. C. Gerry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 558 (1998) ;K. Molmer and A. Sorensen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 8, 1835 (1999) ;G. J. Milburn, quant-ph/9980037 [5] C.A. Sackett, D. Kielpinski, B.E. King, G. Langer, V. Meyer, C.J. Myatt, M. Rowe, Q.A. Turchette, W.M. Itano, D.J. Wineland, and C. Monroe, Nature (London) 404, 56 (000). [6] D. Bouwneester, A. Ekert and A. Zeilinger, The physics of Quantum Information( Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 000) [7] D. Bouwneester et al, Nature(London) 390 575 (1997) [8] K. Mattle et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4656 (1996). [9] D. S. Naik et al Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4733 (000); W. Tittel et al Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4737 (000). 4
[10] D. Bouwneester et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 8, 1345 (1999); J. W. Pan et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4435 (001). [11] P. Kok and S. Braunstein, quant-ph/0001080 [1] D. Bouwneester, quant-ph/0006108 [13] E. Knill, R. Laflamme and G. Milburn, Nature(London) 409, 46 (001). [14] Z. B. Chen, J. W. Pan and Y. D. Zhang, quant-ph/0105100 [15] P. Grangier, J. A. Levenson and J. P. Poizat, Nature(London) 396, 537 (1998). [16] XuBo Zou, K. Pahlke and W. Mathis, submitted to Phys. Rev. A [17] N. Gisin and A. Peres, Phys. lett. A 16, 15(199) [18] D. Kaszlikowski, P. Gnascinski, M. Zukowski, W. Miklaszewski, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4418 (000). [19] Mohamed Bourennane et al., Phys. Rev. A 64, 01306 (001), Gabriel A. Durkin, Christoph Simon, Dik Bouwmeester, quant-ph/010913 [0] Antia Lamas-Linares, John C. Howell, Dik Bouwmeester, Nature, 41, 887-890(001), John C. Howell, Antia Lamas-Linares, Dik Bouwmeester, quantph/010513 Figure Captions Figure 1. The schematic is shown to generate the entangled spin-1 state from Fock state. BS i denotes the beam splitters and D are photon number detectors. Figure. The schematic is shown to generate the entangled spin-1 state from a pair of polarization entangled two-photon state. BS i denotes the symmetric beam splitters and D i are photon number detectors. 5