Abelian and non-abelian Hopfions in all odd dimensions

Similar documents
Non-Abelian and gravitational Chern-Simons densities

Instantons and Sphalerons in a Magnetic Field

Monopoles and Skyrmions. Ya. Shnir. Quarks-2010

Topological Solitons from Geometry

The 3 dimensional Schrödinger Equation

Baryon Physics in Holographic QCD Models (and Beyond) in collaboration with A. Wulzer

Baby Skyrmions in AdS 3 and Extensions to (3 + 1) Dimensions

CLASSIFICATION OF NON-ABELIAN CHERN-SIMONS VORTICES

Week 2 Notes, Math 865, Tanveer

CP n supersymmetric mechanics in the U(n) background gauge fields

Solitons in the SU(3) Faddeev-Niemi Model

Exchange statistics. Basic concepts. University of Oxford April, Jon Magne Leinaas Department of Physics University of Oslo

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 7 Nov 1998

Spinor Formulation of Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

Lorentz-covariant spectrum of single-particle states and their field theory Physics 230A, Spring 2007, Hitoshi Murayama

arxiv:gr-qc/ v2 6 Apr 1999

CP n supersymmetric mechanics in the U(n) background gauge fields

Supporting Information

A Review of Solitons in Gauge Theories. David Tong

Holographic Entanglement Entropy for Surface Operators and Defects

arxiv:nlin/ v1 [nlin.si] 4 Dec 2000

A rotating charged black hole solution in f (R) gravity

752 Final. April 16, Fadeev Popov Ghosts and Non-Abelian Gauge Fields. Tim Wendler BYU Physics and Astronomy. The standard model Lagrangian

Lecturer: Bengt E W Nilsson

The effect of Chern-Simons dynamics on the energy of electrically charged and spinning vortices

THE NONCOMMUTATIVE TORUS

Contact interactions in string theory and a reformulation of QED

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2004 Assignment 3

General-relativistic quantum theory of the electron

On the K-theory classification of topological states of matter

INSTANTON MODULI AND COMPACTIFICATION MATTHEW MAHOWALD

Status of Hořava Gravity

Problem Set 1 Classical Worldsheet Dynamics

φ µ = g µν φ ν. p µ = 1g 1 4 φ µg 1 4,

Introduction to Modern Quantum Field Theory

Chern-Simons Theory and Its Applications. The 10 th Summer Institute for Theoretical Physics Ki-Myeong Lee

Chern-Simons gauge theory The Chern-Simons (CS) gauge theory in three dimensions is defined by the action,

The geometry of the space of BPS vortex-antivortex pairs

8.821 F2008 Lecture 12: Boundary of AdS; Poincaré patch; wave equation in AdS

Descendants of the Chiral Anomaly

Solitons, Vortices, Instantons

Algebraic Theory of Entanglement

Lagrangian. µ = 0 0 E x E y E z 1 E x 0 B z B y 2 E y B z 0 B x 3 E z B y B x 0. field tensor. ν =

On Chern-Simons-Schrödinger equations including a vortex point

8.821 String Theory Fall 2008

Kadath: a spectral solver and its application to black hole spacetimes

Introduction to String Theory ETH Zurich, HS11. 9 String Backgrounds

1 Index Gymnastics and Einstein Convention

th Aegean Summer School / Paros Minás Tsoukalás (CECs-Valdivia)

Amplitudes & Wilson Loops at weak & strong coupling

E 0 0 F [E] + [F ] = 3. Chern-Weil Theory How can you tell if idempotents over X are similar?

Isotropic harmonic oscillator

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 17 Oct 2002

On the BCOV Conjecture

PAPER 51 ADVANCED QUANTUM FIELD THEORY

A complete criterion for convex-gaussian states detection

Assignment 10. Arfken Show that Stirling s formula is an asymptotic expansion. The remainder term is. B 2n 2n(2n 1) x1 2n.

Singular Monopoles and Instantons on Curved Backgrounds

E 2 = p 2 + m 2. [J i, J j ] = iɛ ijk J k

A = 3 B = A 1 1 matrix is the same as a number or scalar, 3 = [3].

Introduction to Chern-Simons forms in Physics - I

A VERY BRIEF LINEAR ALGEBRA REVIEW for MAP 5485 Introduction to Mathematical Biophysics Fall 2010

The N = 2 Gauss-Bonnet invariant in and out of superspace

Solitons and point particles

MILNOR SEMINAR: DIFFERENTIAL FORMS AND CHERN CLASSES

A Variational Analysis of a Gauged Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation

M-Theory and Matrix Models

Quantum Field Theory III

Quark Mass from Tachyon

Symmetry and Properties of Crystals (MSE638) Stress and Strain Tensor

Basics of topological insulator

Introduction to Group Theory

H&M Chapter 5 Review of Dirac Equation

Badis Ydri Ph.D.,2001. January 19, 2011

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 29 Nov 2000

Solving the Geodesic Equation

Quantum Field Theory I Examination questions will be composed from those below and from questions in the textbook and previous exams

Parity P : x x, t t, (1.116a) Time reversal T : x x, t t. (1.116b)

Nucleons from 5D Skyrmions

Quantum Fields in Curved Spacetime

First Year Seminar. Dario Rosa Milano, Thursday, September 27th, 2012

General Relativity and Cosmology Mock exam

Geometry and Physics. Amer Iqbal. March 4, 2010

Critical metrics on connected sums of Einstein four-manifolds

Rotational motion of a rigid body spinning around a rotational axis ˆn;

Supersymmetric Gauge Theories in 3d

Fermion Mixing Angles and the Connection to Non-Trivially Broken Flavor Symmetries

2.1 The metric and and coordinate transformations

Fourth Aegean Summer School: Black Holes Mytilene, Island of Lesvos September 18, 2007

Exercises Symmetries in Particle Physics

The spectral action for Dirac operators with torsion

Holographic study of magnetically induced ρ meson condensation

Anomalies, Gauss laws, and Page charges in M-theory. Gregory Moore. Strings 2004, Paris. Related works: Witten , , ,

Geometric inequalities for black holes

Casimir elements for classical Lie algebras. and affine Kac Moody algebras

Unitary rotations. October 28, 2014

What is a topological insulator? Ming-Che Chang Dept of Physics, NTNU

arxiv:hep-th/ v2 31 Jul 2000

hep-lat/ Dec 94

Quantum Dynamics of Supergravity

Transcription:

Abelian and non-abelian Hopfions in all odd dimensions Tigran Tchrakian Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies (DIAS) National University of Ireland Maynooth, Ireland 7 December, 2012

Table of contents Generalities The Chern-Simons densities Chern-Simons densities of Abelian gauge fields Chern-Simons densities of non-abelian gauge fields Abelian Hopfions CP n sigma models on R 2n+1 Imposition of n-fold azimuthal symmetry The reduced (Abelian) Chern-Simons densities non-abelian Hopfions The 4n 2n Grassmannian sigma models on R 2n+1 Imposition of n-fold azimuthal symmetry The reduced (non-abelian) Chern-Simons densities

Generalities Hopfions are finite energy soliton like solutions to the field equations of some scalar field system. The lower bound on their energies rely on the Chern-Simons density as a topological charge density and hence can exist only in odd space dimensions. The Chern-Simons density is defined in terms of a gauge connection and a gauge curvature, which means that the scalar field system must be a complex sigma model enabling the necessary definitions of a composite connection and curvature. The Chern-Simons density is by construction, not a total divergence, even when the sigma model constraint is taken account of. Hence, it is not a candidadte for a topological charge density as it stands.

Only after imposition of suitable symmetries does it become a total divergence, qualifying it as a topological charge density. Our prescription here is to achieve this aim by imposing multi-azimuthal symmetries. This is the case with the familiar Skyrme-Fadde ev Hopfion on IR 3. Multi-azimuthal symmetry in IR 2n+1 eliminates n azimuthal angles, each in one of the n 2-dimensional subspaces (planes). It follows that after imposition of such symmetry, the residual subsystems will be (n + 1)-dimensional. The residual Chern-Simons density in a (n + 1)-dimensional space can be a total divergence if the Ansatz is parametrised by (n + 1) independant functions of the (n + 1) residual coordinates.

The residual Chern-Simons density will be a total divergence only when parametrised by functions that fulfill the sigma model constraint. Otherwise, it will be essentially total divergence in the sense that only when the constraint is imposed via a Lagrange multiplier will the resulting Euler-Lagrange equations be trivial. Chern-Simons densities composite connections and curvatures present candidates for topological charge densities only when subjected to suitable symmetries. This is in stark contrast to the topological charge densities of solitons (incl. instantons, monopoles, Skyrmions, vortices, etc.) whose topological charge densities are defined by Chern-Pontryagin densities (and their descendants) which are total divergence without imposition of any symmetry.

Abelian Chern-Simons densities Abelian curvature of Abelian connection A i F ij = i A j j A i Definition of Abelian (gauge invariant) Chern-Pontryagin density in 2n + 2 dimensions Ω CP = ε µ1 ν 1 µ 2 ν 2...µ n+1 ν n+1 F µ1 ν 1 F µ2 ν 2... F µn+1 ν n+1 = ε µ1 ν 1 µ 2 ν 2...µ n+1 ν n+1 µn+1 ( Aνn+1 F µ1 ν 1 F µ2 ν 2... F µnν n ) = µn+1 Ω µn+1 implies definition of Abelian (gauge variant) Chern-Simons density in 2n + 1 dimensions Ω CS = ε i1 j 1 i 2 j 2...i nj nj n+1 A jn+1 F i1 j 1 F i2 j 2... F inj n Ω CS is not a total divergence and leads to the variational equations which is gauge covariant. ε i1 j 1 i 2 j 2...i nj nj n+1 F i1 j 1 F i2 j 2... F inj n = 0

non-abelian Chern-Simons densities non-abelian curvature of Abelian connection A i F ij = i A j j A i + [A i, A j ] Definition of non-abelian (gauge invariant) Chern-Pontryagin density in 2n + 2 dimensions Ω CP = ε µ1 ν 1 µ 2 ν 2...µ n+1 ν n+1 Tr F µ1 ν 1 F µ2 ν 2... F µn+1 ν n+1 = µn+1 Ω µn+1 which is a total divergence and likewise implies definition of non-abelian (gauge variant) Chern-Simons density in 2n + 1 dimensions. For n = 1, D = 3, it is ( Ω (1) CS = ε ijktr A k F ij 2 ) 3 F if j. For n = 2, D = 5, it is Ω (2) CS = ε ijklm Tr A m ( F ij F kl F ij A k A l + 2 5 A ia j A k A l ).

The equations of motion these result in are which are gauge covariant. ε ijk F ij = 0 ε ijklm F ij F kl = 0 For n 3 there are multiple distinct definitions for the CS density, each characterised by the number of traces in the definition. For n = 3, D = 7, there are two possibilities; a definition with a single trace and another one with double trace. These are Ω (3) CS = ε ijklmnp Tr A p (F ij F kl F mn 4 5 F ijf kl A m A n 2 5 F ija k F lm A n + 4 5 F ija k A l A m A n 8 ) 35 A ia j A k A l A m A n, ( Ω (3) CS = ε ijklmnp Tr A p F mn 2 ) 3 A ma n (Tr F ij F kl )

The equations of motion these result in are ε ijklmnp F ij F kl F mn = 0 ε ijklmnp (Tr F ij F kl ) F mn = 0 which are gauge covariant.

CP n models on IR 2n+1 Described by complex n tuplets Z = z 1 z 2.... z n+1 z a ; Z = z 1 z 2.... z n+1 za a = 1, 2,..., n + 1, parametrised by 2n + 1 real independant functions subject to constraint and P = is a projection operator. Z Z z a z a = 1, ( 1I Z Z ) ( δ b a z a z b).

This constraint in invariant under the action of the local Abelian transformation g = e iλ(x) Z Z g leading to the definition of the Abelian composite connection B i = i Z i Z, i = 1, 2,..., 2n + 1 transforming like B i B i ± i Λ. There follow the definitions of the covariant derivative of Z and the Abelian curvature D i Z = i Z + i B i Z, G ij = i B j j B i, D i Z transforming covariantly under the action of g, and G ij invariantly.

The topological charge density of the Abelian Hopfion on IR 2n+1 is the Abelian Chern-Simons density on IR 2n+1 defined by replacing A i B i and F ij G ij Ω CS = ε i1 i 2...i 2n+1 B i2n+1 G i1 i 2 G i3 i 4... G i2n 1 i 2n. Subjecting the density to variations of Z (or Z) Ω CS + λ (1 Z Z) λ being the Lagrange multiplier yields the nontrivial gauge covariant equation ε i1 i 2...i 2n+1 D i2n+1 Z G i1 i 2 G i3 i 4... G i2n 1 i 2n = 0 which trivialises only under the appropriate symmetries, subject to which Ω CS becomes essentially total divergence, and hence a candidate for a topological charge density.

CP 1 system on IR 3 : mono-azimuthal (axial) symmetry The Ansatz for Z, featuring axial symmetry in the (x 1, x 2 ) plane, is Z = [ a + ib c e inϕ ] [ sin f 2 eiα cos f 2 einϕ ], a 2 + b 2 + c 2 = 1 a, b, c, f and α are functions of ρ = x α 2 and z x 3 ; α = 1, 2 n is the vorticity and ϕ is the azimuthal angle in the (x 1, x 2 ) plane. Subject to this Ansatz, the Abelian Chern Simons density reduces to Ω (3) CS = 4 n ρ c det a b c a,ρ b,ρ c,ρ a,z b,z c,z.

This expression of Ω (3) CS [a, b, c] is not a total divergence. Rather, Ω (3) CS [a, b, c] + λ(1 a2 + b 2 + c 2 ) is essentially total divergence and yields trivial equations of motion. (λ is a Lagrange multiplier.) Only when the trigonometric parametrisation, which satisfies the sigma model constraint, does [f, α] become explicitly the total divergence, Ω (3) CS where F (ρ, z) is the function Ω (3) CS = 4 n 3 ρ (F,ρ α,z (ρ, z)), F = cos 3 f 2. The topological charge can then be expressed as, Q = 4 3 2π Ω (3) CS ρ dρ dz = 4 3 2π n F [,ρ α,z] dρ dz

Denoting the coordinates in the half plane (ρ, z) = ξ i, i = 1, 2, 3, i.e., ( ) r sin ψ ξ i = r cos ψ with 0 ψ π, this integral can be rewritten as Q = 4 3 2π n ε ij i F j α d 2 ξ = 4 3 2π n (F ˆx i ε ij j α) r ˆξ i ds = 4 ψ=π 3 2π F ψ α r dψ ψ=0 where ψ is the polar angle in the (ρ, z) half plane. Requiring the field configurations have the asymptotic values the results is lim f (r, θ) = 0, lim r α(r, θ) = m π, r Q = 8 3 n m π2.

CP 2 system on IR 5 : bi-azimuthal symmetry The Ansatz for Z, featuring bi-azimuthal symmetry in the (x 1, x 2 ) and (x 3, x 4 ) planes, is a + ib sin 1 Z = c 1 e in 2 f eiα 1ϕ cos 1 c 2 e in 2 f sin g ein 1ϕ 2χ cos 1 2 f cos g ein 2χ a, b, c 1, c 2, f, g and α are functions of ρ = x α 2, σ = x A 2, and z x 5 ; α = 1, 2; A = 3, 4 n 1 and n 2 are the vorticities, and, ϕ and χ are the azimuthal angles in the (x 1, x 2 ) and (x 3, x 4 ) planes respectively. Subject to this Ansatz, the Abelian Chern Simons density on IR 5 reduces to Ω (5) CS = 32 n a b c 1 c 2 1n 2 ρσ c 1 c 2 det a,ρ b,ρ c 1,ρ c 2,ρ a,σ b,σ c 1,σ c 2,σ. a,z b,z c 1,z c 2,z

Using the trigonometric parametrisation of this Ansatz, in terms of the functions F = cos f + 1 cos 2f, G = cos 2g, 2 and denoting the coordinates in the quarter sphere (ρ, σ, z) = ξ i, i = 1, 2, 3, i.e., r sin ψ sin θ ξ i = r sin ψ cos θ r cos ψ with 0 ψ π and 0 θ π 2, the topological charge Q is given by the volume integral Q = (2π) 2 n 1 n 2 = (2π) 2 n 1 n 2 where ds = r 2 sin ψ dψ dθ, i.e. ε ijk i G j G k α d 3 ξ ε ijk (F j G k α) ˆξ i ds r

Q = 4 π 2 n 1 n 2 π ψ=0 π 2 θ=0 F ( ψ G θ α ψ α θ G) dψ dθ. r Here, ψ is the polar angle between the (ρ, σ)-plane and z. Requiring that the field configurations in question satisfy the asymptotic values lim f = 0, lim g = θ, lim α = m π, r r r the result is Ω (5) CS = 12 n 1 n 2 m π 3.

CP 3 system on IR 7 : tri-azimuthal symmetry The Ansatz for Z, featuring tri-azimuthal symmetry in the (x 1, x 2 ), (x 3, x 4 ) and (x 5, x 6 ) planes, is Z = a + ib c 1 e in 1ϕ c 2 e in 2χ c 3 e in 3ζ = sin 1 2 f eiα cos 1 2 f sin g cos h ein 1ϕ cos 1 2 f sin g sin h ein 2χ cos 1 2 f cos g ein 3ζ a, b, c 1, c 2, c 3, f, g, h and α are functions of ρ = x α 2, σ = x A 2, τ = x a 2, and z x 7 ; with α = 1, 2; A = 3, 4; a = 5, 6. n 1, n 2 and n 3 are the vorticities, and, ϕ, χ and ζ are the azimuthal angles in the (x 1, x 2 ), (x 3, x 4 ) and (x 5, x 6 ) planes respectively.

Subject to this Ansatz the Abelian Chern Simons density on IR 7 reduces to a b c 1 c 2 c 3 Ω (7) CS = 96 n 1 n 2 n 3 a,ρ b,ρ c 1,ρ c 2,ρ c 3,ρ c 1 c 2 c 3 det ρστ a,σ b,σ c 1,σ c 2,σ c 3,σ. a,τ b,τ c 1,τ c 2,τ c 3,τ a,z b,z c 1,z c 2,z c 3,z Using the trigonometric parametrisation of this Ansatz, in terms of the functions F = cos 6 f 2, G = 1 4 (1 cos 2g)2, H = cos 2h, and denoting the coordinates in the sextant of the hypersphere (ρ, σ, τ, z) = ξ i, i = 1, 2, 3, 4, i.e., r sin ψ sin θ 1 sin θ 2 ξ i = r sin ψ sin θ 1 cos θ 2 r sin ψ cos θ 1 r cos ψ with 0 ψ π, 0 θ 1 π 2 and 0 θ 2 π 2,

Q = 4 (2π) 3 n 1 n 2 n 3 = 4 (2π) 3 n 1 n 2 n 3 ε ijkl i F j G k H z α d 4 ξ ε ijkl (F j G k H l α) ˆξ i ds r where ds = r 3 sin 2 ψ sin θ 1 dψ dθ 1 dθ 2. Requiring the field configuration in question take the asymptotic values lim g = θ 1, lim h = θ 2, lim α = m π, r r r the result is Ω (5) CS = 64 n 1 n 2 n 3 m π 4.

Grassmannian models on IR 2n+1 These Grassmannian models are described by complex valued fields [ ] z1 Z = where z 1 and z 2 are complex 2n 2n matrices subject to the constraint Z Z = 1I 2n 2n. and the 4n 4n quantity Π = (1I Z Z ) is a projection operator. This constraint is invariant under the action of the local unitary non-abelian gauge transformation g acting on Z z 2 Z Z g, Z g Z.

Here, the unitary matrix g is chosen to be an element of SO(2n + 2) in the 2n 2n chiral Dirac matrix representation. The invariance of this constraint leads to the definition of the non-abelian (anti-hermitian) composite connection transforming like B i = Z i Z. B i g 1 B i g + g 1 i g. There follow the definitions of the covariant derivative of Z and the (composite) non-abelian curvature D i Z = i Z Z B i G ij = [i B j] + [B i, B j ] which under the action of g transform covariantly as D i Z D i Z g, G ij g 1 G ij g.

The non-abelian Chern-Simons densities on IR 2n+1, up to n = 3, are ( Ω (1) CS = ε ijktr B k G ij 2 ) 3 B ib j. Ω (2) CS = ε ijklm Tr B m ( G ij G kl G ij B k B l + 2 5 B ib j B k B l ). Ω (3) CS = ε ijklmnp Tr B p (G ij G kl G mn 4 5 G ijg kl B m B n 2 5 G ijb k G lm B n + 4 5 G ijb k B l B m B n 8 ) 35 B ib j B k B l B m B n, ( Ω (3) CS = ε ijklmnp Tr B p G mn 2 ) 3 B mb n (Tr G ij G kl ).

Subjecting these densities to variations of Z (or Z) Ω (n) CS + Λ (1I Z Z) Λ being the (now matrix valued) Lagrange multiplier, the resulting nontrivial gauge covariant equations in the above examples are ε ijk D k Z G ij = 0 ε ijklm D m Z G ij G kl = 0 ε ijklmnp D p Z G ij G kl G mn = 0 ε ijklmnp (Tr G ij G kl ) D p Z G mn = 0 which trivialise only under the appropriate symmetries, subject to which Ω (n) CS, rendering them candidates for topological charge densities.

2 4 Grassmannian on IR 3 : mono-azimuthal symmetry The Anstaz we for the field Z on IR 3 is [ ] [ ] z1 a 1I + 2 b Σ34 Z = = z 2 c n α, Σ α the functions (a, b, c) depending on (ρ, z) as in the Abelian case and with the unit vector n α ( ) n α cos n ϕ = sin n ϕ n being the winding (vortex) number in the (x 1, x 2 ) plane. The spin matrices Σ α = ( Σ 1, Σ 2 ), are the first two of the chiral Dirac matrices in 4 dimensions, the last two being ( Σ 3, Σ 4 ). The chiral representations of the SO(4) algebra are with i, j = α, 3, 4. Σ ij = 1 4 Σ [i Σ j],

It turns out that this Ansatz leads to an Abelian composite connection B i = (B α, B z ), so our prescription cannot supply a non-abelian Hopfion in three dimensions. B α = 2 [(a b,ρ b a,ρ ) ˆx α + nρ ] c2 (ˆxε) α Σ 12, B z = 2 (a b,z b a,z ) Σ 12, whose commutators [B i, B j ] = [B i, B z ] = 0. The composite curvature G ij is then Abelian, and coincides with the previously constructed Abelian case.

4 8 Grassmannian on IR 5 : bi-azimuthal symmetry The Anstaz we use for the field on IR 5 is Z = [ z1 z 2 ] [ = a 1I + 2 b Σ 56 c 1 n α 1 Σ α + c 2 n A 2 Σ A ], The functions (a, b, c 1, c 2 ) depending on (ρ, σ, z) as in the corresponding Abelian case, with α = 1, 2, A = 3, 4 and z x 5. ϕ and χ are the azimuthal angles in the (x 1, x 2 ) and (x 3, x 4 ) planes respectively, such that the unit vectors n α and n2 A are parametrised as n α 1 = ( cos n1 ϕ sin n 1 ϕ ) n A 2 = ( cos n2 χ sin n 2 χ ), (n 1, n 2 ) being the winding (vortex) numbers in each of the two planes respectively. The spin matrices ( Σ α, Σ A, Σ 5, Σ 6 ), are the (left) chiral Dirac matrices in 6 dimensions, in terms of which the chiral representations of the SO(6) algebra are constructed.

Subject to the bi-azimuthally symmetric Ansatz the Chern-Simons density reduces to Ω (5) CS = 96 i n a b c 1 c 2 1n 2 ρσ c 1 c 2 [ 4 + 3(c1 2 + c2 2 )] det a,ρ b,ρ c 1,ρ c 2,ρ a,σ b,σ c 1,σ c 2,σ. a,z b,z c 1,z c 2,z Note that this non-abelian density differs qualitatively from the corresponding Abelian one due to the appearance of the prefactor [ 4 + 3(c 2 1 + c 2 2 )]. Using the trigonometric parametrisation of this Ansatz, in terms of the functions F = 5 cos f + cos 2 f cos 3 f, G = cos 2g, and denoting the coordinates in the quarter sphere (ρ, σ, z) = ξ i, i = 1, 2, 3, i.e., as before in the Abelian case on IR 5 the topological charge Q is given by the volume integral

Q = 3 2 i (2π)2 n 1 n 2 = 3 2 i (2π)2 n 1 n 2 ε ijk i G j G k α d 3 ξ ε ijk (F j G k α) ˆξ i ds r where ds = r 2 sin ψ dψ dθ, and where we have applied Gauss Theorem, and Q = 6 i π 2 n 1 n 2 π ψ=0 π 2 θ=0 F ( ψ G θ α ψ α θ G) dψ dθ. r Requiring the field configurations in question have the asymptotic values the result is lim f = 0, lim g = θ, lim α = m π, r r r Ω (5) CS = 60 i n 1 n 2 m π 3.

8 16 Grassmannian on IR 7 : tri-azimuthal symmetry The Anstaz we use for the field on IR 7 is [ ] [ ] z1 a 1I + 2 b Σ 78 Z = = z 2 c 1 n1 α Σ α + c 2 n2 A Σ A + c 3 n3 A Σ, a The functions (a, b, c 1, c 2, c 3 ) depending on (ρ, σ, τ, z) as in the corresponding Abelian case, with α = 1, 2, A = 3, 4, a = 5, 6 and z x 7. The azimutal angles in the (x 1, x 2 ), (x 3, x 4 ) and (x 5, x 6 ) planes are denoted by ϕ, χ and ζ respectively, such that the unit vectors n1 α, na 2 and na 3 are parametrised as n α 1 = ( cos n1 ϕ sin n 1 ϕ ) n A 2 = ( cos n2 χ sin n 2 χ ), n3 a = ( cos n3 ζ sin n 3 ζ (n 1, n 2, n 3 ) being the winding (vortex) numbers in each of the three planes respectively. The spin matrices ( Σ α, Σ A, Σ a, Σ 7, Σ 8 ), are the (left) chiral Dirac matrices in 8 dimensions ),

Subject to the tri-azimuthally symmetric Ansatz in the Chern-Simons density reduces to a b c d e Ω (7) CS n 1 n 2 n 3 a,ρ b,ρ c 1,ρ c 2,ρ c 3,ρ c 1 c 2 c 3 Θ(c 1, c 2, c 3 ) det ρστ a,σ b,σ c 1,σ c 2,σ c 3,σ a,τ b,τ c 1,τ c 2,τ c 3,τ a,z b,z c 1,z c 2,z c 3,z where the prefactor Θ(c 1, c 2, c 3 ) is not yet calcuated. Using the trigonometric parametrisation of this Ansatz and requiring the appropriate asymptotic behaviours, as before, the resulting topological charge is calculated Ω (5) CS n 1 n 2 n 3 m π 4.