Final Exam TTK4190 Guidance and Control

Similar documents
Final Exam TTK 4190 Guidance and Control

Exam - TTK 4190 Guidance & Control Eksamen - TTK 4190 Fartøysstyring

Problem 1: Ship Path-Following Control System (35%)

TTK4190 Guidance and Control Exam Suggested Solution Spring 2011

Design of a Heading Autopilot for Mariner Class Ship with Wave Filtering Based on Passive Observer

SEAKEEPING AND MANEUVERING Prof. Dr. S. Beji 2

Trajectory Tracking of a Near-Surface Torpedo using Numerical Methods

STABILITY AND TRIM OF MARINE VESSELS. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Subject 2.017

A Ship Heading and Speed Control Concept Inherently Satisfying Actuator Constraints

SHIP BUOYANCY AND STABILITY. Lecture 03 Ship initial stability

Underactuated Dynamic Positioning of a Ship Experimental Results

Chapter 2 Hydrostatics Buoyancy, Floatation and Stability

Hydrostatics and Stability Dr. Hari V Warrior Department of Ocean Engineering and Naval Architecture Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

Model Reference Adaptive Control of Underwater Robotic Vehicle in Plane Motion

SHIP BUOYANCY AND STABILITY

Breu, Frequency Detuning of Parametric Roll

A Separation Principle for Dynamic Positioning of Ships: Theoretical and Experimental Results

Final Exam December 13, 2016

Seakeeping Models in the Frequency Domain

COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. Index

Wave Synchronizing Crane Control during Water Entry in Offshore Moonpool Operations Experimental Results

Static Forces on Surfaces-Buoyancy. Fluid Mechanics. The equilibrium of a body may be: Stable. Unstable. Neutral (could be considered stable)

Chapter IV. (Ship Hydro-Statics & Dynamics) Floatation & Stability

Nonlinear Tracking Control of Underactuated Surface Vessel

SCALE MODEL TESTS OF A FISHING VESSEL IN ROLL MOTION PARAMETRIC RESONANCE

Transport Analysis Report Full Stability Analysis. Project EXAMPLE PROJECT DEMO RUN FOR REVIEW. Client ORCA OFFSHORE

ITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines

A numerical DP MODULE to help design and operation for projects including DP components

Offshore Hydromechanics Module 1

Seakeeping characteristics of intact and damaged ship in the Adriatic Sea

Introduction to Flight Dynamics

Control of the MARES Autonomous Underwater Vehicle

Quaternion-Based Tracking Control Law Design For Tracking Mode

Estimating Maneuvering and Seakeeping Characteristics with Neural Networks

Wave Synchronizing Crane Control during Water Entry in Offshore. Moonpool Operations Experimental Results

Final Exam April 30, 2013

Fluid Mechanics. Forces on Fluid Elements. Fluid Elements - Definition:

SAFEHULL-DYNAMIC LOADING APPROACH FOR VESSELS

Wuchang Shipbuilding Industry Co., Ltd. China Shipbuilding Industry Corporation

A Discussion About Seakeeping and Manoeuvring Models For Surface Vessels

Final Exam Ship Structures Page 1 MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND. Engineering Ship Structures

Localizer Hold Autopilot

Study on Strut Effect on Turning Characteristics of LNG Carrier

The basic principle to be used in mechanical systems to derive a mathematical model is Newton s law,

Development of formulas allowing to predict hydrodynamic responses of inland vessels operated within the range of navigation 0.6 Hs 2.

Computer Problem 1: SIE Guidance, Navigation, and Control

Video 8.1 Vijay Kumar. Property of University of Pennsylvania, Vijay Kumar

Nonlinear Observer Design for Dynamic Positioning

Fluid Mechanics Prof. S. K. Som Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur. Lecture - 8 Fluid Statics Part V

5 SIMILITUDE. 5.1 Use of Nondimensional Groups

Control design of fin roll stabilization in beam seas based on Lyapunov s direct method

Analysis of Dynamic Stability of a Fast Single Craft Being Chased

EE 380 EXAM II 3 November 2011 Last Name (Print): First Name (Print): ID number (Last 4 digits): Section: DO NOT TURN THIS PAGE UNTIL YOU ARE TOLD TO

OPTIMAL CONSTRAINED CONTROL ALLOCATION IN MARINE SURFACE VESSELS WITH RUDDERS. Tor A. Johansen Λ Thomas P. Fuglseth Λ Petter Tøndel Λ Thor I.

Requirements for Computational Methods to be sed for the IMO Second Generation Intact Stability Criteria

OPTIMAL CONSTRAINED CONTROL ALLOCATION IN MARINE SURFACE VESSELS WITH RUDDERS. Tor A. Johansen Thomas P. Fuglseth Petter Tøndel Thor I.

JUSTIFYING THE STABILIZATION OF A MARGINALLY STABLE SHIP

Sailing Performance and Maneuverability of a Traditional Ryukyuan Tribute Ship

RULES PUBLICATION NO. 17/P ZONE STRENGTH ANALYSIS OF HULL STRUCTURE OF ROLL ON/ROLL OFF SHIP

TTK4150 Nonlinear Control Systems Solution 6 Part 2

Passive Nonlinear Observer Design for Ships Using. Lyapunov Methods: Full-Scale Experiments with a. Supply Vessel

EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION OF A MARINE PROPELLER THRUST ESTIMATION SCHEME. Luca Pivano yvind N. Smogeli Thor Inge Fossen Tor Arne Johansen

Wave Synchronizing Crane Control during Water Entry in Offshore Moonpool Operations

Output Feedback Control for Maneuvering Systems Using Observer Backstepping

Design and modelling of an airship station holding controller for low cost satellite operations

Cooperative Control Applied to Multi-Vessel DP Operations - Numerical and Experimental Analysis

Hydrostatic and Stability IN A NUTSHELL. of Floating Structures. Compendium. Relevant to Questions in Exam. Robert Bronsart

MAE 143B - Homework 9

Non Linear Submarine Modelling and Motion Control with Model in Loop

Fuzzy Adaptive Control for Trajectory Tracking of Autonomous Underwater Vehicle

Nonlinear Formation Control of Marine Craft

Name: Fall 2014 CLOSED BOOK

Ships Steering Autopilot Design by Nomoto Model

A Time-Varying Lookahead Distance Guidance Law for Path Following

WAMIT-MOSES Hydrodynamic Analysis Comparison Study. JRME, July 2000

Nonlinear Thrust Controller for Marine Propellers in Four-Quadrant Operations

sc Control Systems Design Q.1, Sem.1, Ac. Yr. 2010/11

Comparing Combinations of Linear and Nonlinear Feedback Terms for Motion Control of Marine Surface Vessels

Flight and Orbital Mechanics

Research on Prediction of Ship Manoeuvrability

DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF OFFSHORE TENSION LEG PLATFORMS UNDER HYDRODYNAMIC FORCES

Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!

Root Locus Design Example #4

Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION

43. A person sits on a freely spinning lab stool that has no friction in its axle. When this person extends her arms,

Problem Description The problem we consider is stabilization of a single-input multiple-state system with simultaneous magnitude and rate saturations,

Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!

/ m U) β - r dr/dt=(n β / C) β+ (N r /C) r [8+8] (c) Effective angle of attack. [4+6+6]

A) 1 gm 2 /s. B) 3 gm 2 /s. C) 6 gm 2 /s. D) 9 gm 2 /s. E) 10 gm 2 /s. A) 0.1 kg. B) 1 kg. C) 2 kg. D) 5 kg. E) 10 kg A) 2:5 B) 4:5 C) 1:1 D) 5:4

Effect of Tethers Tension Force in the Behavior of a Tension Leg Platform Subjected to Hydrodynamic Force Amr R. El-Gamal, Ashraf Essa, Ayman Ismail

Quaternion Feedback Regulation of Underwater Vehicles Ola-Erik FJELLSTAD and Thor I. FOSSEN Abstract: Position and attitude set-point regulation of au

Modeling and Motion Analysis of the MARES Autonomous Underwater Vehicle

Research Article Investigation into the Dynamics and Control of an Underwater Vehicle-Manipulator System

Student name: This is a closed book examination. You are allowed 1 sheet of 8.5 x 11 paper with notes.

MAE 142 Homework #5 Due Friday, March 13, 2009

Path Following of Underactuated Marine Surface Vessels in the Presence of Unknown Ocean Currents

On an Advanced Shipboard Information and Decision-making System for Safe and Efficient Passage Planning

Ship Nonlinear Rolling and Roll Angle Reconstruction Based on FIR

NTNU Norges teknisknaturvitenskapelige

Handling Roll Constraints for Path Following of Marine Surface Vessels using Coordinated Rudder and Propulsion Control

Transcription:

Trondheim Department of engineering Cybernetics Contact person: Professor Thor I. Fossen Phone: 73 59 43 61 Cell: 91 89 73 61 Email: tif@itk.ntnu.no Final Exam TTK4190 Guidance and Control Friday May 15, 009 Hours: 09:00-13:00 On the Exam Day: All printed and handwritten materials are allowed Calculators approved by NTNU can be used Language: English No of pages: 5 The exams will be graded by Fr iday June 5, 009. You may write your answers in Norwegian (bokmål, nynorsk), German or English. Perfect score amounts to 100%.

Problem 1: Modeling of Marine Vessels (30%) 1. (4%) Explain briefly the difference of first-principle and black box modeling.. (6%) Explain briefly why we need different models for simulation, feedback control and state estimation. 3. Consider a box shaped tanker with main dimensions: L pp (length between the perpendiculars), B (width) and T (draft). Assume that the drag coefficient does not vary along the x-axis of the ship and use the following formula 1 Lpp / D Y = ρ ( ) ( ) ( ) T x C Lpp / d x v + xr v + xr dx to compute an estimate of: A. (6%) The maneuvering coefficient Y vvfor a straight-line maneuver (no yaw motion) B. (6%) The maneuvering coefficient Y rrfor a pure yaw motion (no transverse motion). The derived expressions should only be functions of the cross-flow drag parameters as defined by the formula for Y. 4. (8%) Set up the longitudinal coupled equations of motion for a completely submerged torpedo shaped AUV. Assume that the damping matrix is nonlinear and decoupled. All parameters in the model must be defined (one sentence description for each parameter). Set up a list of assumptions needed for the model to be valid. The actuator models can be neglected that is, use forces and moments as control inputs. Problem : Modeling and Control of Roll Motions (40%) The roll motion of a box shaped tanker with main dimensions: L pp (length between the perpendiculars), B (width) and T (draft), can be modeled as Ix Kp) φ K pφ+ W GM sinφ = τ ( T where φ denotes the roll angle and τ is the control input. Assume that the center of gravity (CG) is located in the water line. The distance between the transverse metacenter and the center of buoyancy (CB) is given BM I T T =

where I T denotes the transverse moment of inertia about the water plane and is the volume displacement. 1. (3%) Find expressions for IT, and GM T as functions of the ship main dimensions.. (%) What is the relationship between the potential coefficients and the hydrodynamic derivatives K and K in the roll equation? p p 3. Assume that L pp = 46.0m, B = 46.0m and T = 10.0m while the radius of gyration R44 is 17.1m. In addition, assume that: Density of sea water: ρ = 105kg/m 3 Acceleration of gravity: g = 9.81m/s Based on the data above, A. (%) Compute the mass of the tanker. B. (%) Compute the roll moment of inertia. C. (%) Compute the transverse metacentric height for φ = 0 deg. D. (%) Plot the righting arm GZ = GM T sinφ as a function of the roll angle and explain how the nonlinearity affects the rolling motion of the ship. Also indicate how you can find the your figure. E. (%) Is the ship metacenteric stable (why/why not)? GM T -value in 4. (5%) Find an expression for the natural roll period that is valid for small roll angles. Compute an estimate of the natural roll period of the vessel based on this formula. Hint: The potential coefficients in roll as a function of the wave excitation frequency are given by Figure 1. 5. (5%) What is the relative damping ratio at the natural frequency? Viscous effects can be neglected. 6. (5%) Assume that a payload with mass m = 10.000 tons is lifted onboard the ship and placed h = 0m vertically above the ship s CG. You may further assume that the CB and the displacement are unchanged. Compute the change in the transverse metacentric height GM T due to the payload. 7. (10%) Assume that the tanker is equipped with a stabilizing water tank that generates the control input τ and neglect all external disturbances. Derive a control law for roll damping and use a Lyapunov function to prove/conclude what kind of stability you have (uniform, asymptotic, exponential, local, global etc.). 3

1. x 1010 A 44 (U=0 m/s) 1.15 1.1 1.05 1 0.95 0.9 0 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 frequency (rad/s) 14 x 108 B 44 (U=0 m/s) 1 10 8 6 4 0 0 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 frequency (rad/s) Figure 1. A 44 and B 44 as a function of the wave excitation frequency. 4

Problem 3: Guidance and Control (30%) 1. (4%) In what kind of marine operations is it necessary to use wave filtering? Also give one example of a motion control system that not uses wave filtering.. Consider the yaw motion of ship given by ( Iz Nr ) r+ H( r) r = τ 3 where H() r = ar+ ar is a nonlinear function andτ is the yaw moment due to 1 rudders and environmental disturbances. The parameters satisfy a 1 < 0 and a > 0. Assume the ship is equipped with two rudders as shown in Figure. The rudders produce two yaw moments τi = k δi δ i, i = 1, where k>0 is constant. Figure. Ship equipped with two aft rudders. Design a nonlinear heading controller for tracking of a time-varying smooth reference signal and prove stability for the following two cases (neglect the wave filter and assume full state feedback): A. (6%) Both rudders have the same deflections: δ1 δ. B. (10 %) The rudders are individually controlled and should not be identically equal. Prove stability of the closed loop system and give the controller gain requirements as a function of the model parameters. 3. (5%) Explain how wind disturbances can be compensated by the control system. 4. (5%) Explain how current disturbances can be compensated by the control system. 5