pmssm Dark Matter Searches On Ice! Randy Cotta (Stanford/SLAC) In collaboration with: K.T.K. Howe (Stanford) J.L. Hewett (SLAC) T.G.

Similar documents
Cosmic Ray Anomalies from the MSSM?

Searches for Dark Matter Annihilations in the Sun and Earth with IceCube and DeepCore. Matthias Danninger for the IceCube collaboration

Use of event-level IceCube data in SUSY scans

Gustav Wikström. for the IceCube collaboration

Global SUSY Fits with IceCube

SUSY AND COSMOLOGY. Jonathan Feng UC Irvine. SLAC Summer Institute 5-6 August 2003

Dark matter in split extended supersymmetry

FERMION PORTAL DARK MATTER

Dark matter and LHC: complementarities and limitations

IceCube & DeepCore Overview and Dark Matter Searches. Matthias Danninger for the IceCube collaboration

Prospects and Blind Spots for Neutralino Dark Matter

Measuring Dark Matter Properties with High-Energy Colliders

Supersymmetry Without Prejudice at the LHC

PHY326/426 Dark Matter and the Universe. Dr. Vitaly Kudryavtsev F9b, Tel.:

Sho IWAMOTO. 15 Sep Osaka University. Based on [ ] in collaboration with M. Abdullah, J. L. Feng, and B. Lillard (UC Irvine)

Sho IWAMOTO. 7 Nov HEP phenomenology joint Cavendish DAMTP U. Cambridge

ATLAS Missing Energy Signatures and DM Effective Field Theories

IceCube 79 Solar WIMP Search. Matthias Danninger

Dark Matter WIMP and SuperWIMP

DUSEL NATIONAL LAB ROLE ESSENTIAL FOR SNOLAB AND DUSEL EXPERIMENTS SLUO

Probing SUSY Dark Matter with Vector Boson Fusion at the LHC

The Sun as a Particle Physics Laboratory

Dynamics of solar system bound WIMPs

Dark Matter Phenomenology

from Dark Matter Annihilation in the Sun

Ingredients to this analysis

Lecture 14. Dark Matter. Part IV Indirect Detection Methods

LHC searches for dark matter.! Uli Haisch

- A Bayesian approach

Search for neutralino dark matter with the AMANDA neutrino telescope

Indirect Dark Matter Detection

Constraining minimal U(1) B L model from dark matter observations

(Neutrino indirect) detection of neutralino dark matter in (non) universals SUSY GUT models

Contributions by M. Peskin, E. Baltz, B. Sadoulet, T. Wizansky

Spectra of Cosmic Rays

Supersymmetric dark matter with low reheating temperature of the Universe

Dark matter at LHC (Mostly ATLAS) Ian Hinchliffe LBNL

Effective theory of dark matter direct detection. Riccardo Catena. Chalmers University of Technology

Astroparticle Physics with IceCube

Emerging the 7 TeV LHC & the LC

LHC Impact on DM searches

Collider Searches for Dark Matter

WIMP Dark Matter + SUSY

Earth WIMP search with IceCube. Jan Kunnen for the IceCube Collaboration

Indirect Searches for Gravitino Dark Matter

Testing a DM explanation of the positron excess with the Inverse Compton scattering

Neutrinos and DM (Galactic)

Background and sensitivity predictions for XENON1T

DM & SUSY Direct Search at ILC. Tomohiko Tanabe (U. Tokyo) December 8, 2015 Tokusui Workshop 2015, KEK

SUSY w/o the LHC: Neutralino & Gravitino LSPs

Interpre'ng a CMS lljjp T Excess With the Golden Cascade of the MSSM

Signatures of clumpy dark matter in the global 21 cm background signal D.T. Cumberland, M. Lattanzi, and J.Silk arxiv:

Sneutrino dark matter and its LHC phenomenology

Non-Minimal Kaluza Klein Dark Matter

ICHEP 2008 Philadelphia

INDIRECT DARK MATTER DETECTION

An update on scalar singlet dark matter

Kaluza-Klein Theories - basic idea. Fig. from B. Greene, 00

Where is SUSY? Institut für Experimentelle Kernphysik

M. Lattanzi. 12 th Marcel Grossmann Meeting Paris, 17 July 2009

The Story of Wino Dark matter

NEUTRINOS FROM KALUZA KLEIN DARK MATTER ANNIHILATIONS IN THE SUN

arxiv:hep-ph/ v2 9 Sep 2005

Lecture 12. Dark Matter. Part II What it could be and what it could do

Dennis Silverman UC Irvine Physics and Astronomy Talk to UC Irvine OLLI May 9, 2011

Dark Matter Implications for SUSY

Cosmological Constraint on the Minimal Universal Extra Dimension Model

COSMOLOGY AT COLLIDERS

Exotica in CMS. ICNFP 2015 Kolymbari, Crete 25 August Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz CMS Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna

Week 3 - Part 2 Recombination and Dark Matter. Joel Primack

What is known about Dark Matter?

Interpretations of Early LHC Jets + MET Searches

GALACTIC CENTER GEV GAMMA- RAY EXCESS FROM DARK MATTER WITH GAUGED LEPTON NUMBERS. Jongkuk Kim (SKKU) Based on Physics Letters B.

Dark Matter from Non-Standard Cosmology

Dark Matter in the Universe

Search for R-parity violating Supersymmetry. III Phys. Inst. A, RWTH Aachen

IMPLICATIONS OF PARTICLE PHYSICS FOR COSMOLOGY

SUSY searches at the LHC * and Dark Matter

Signals from Dark Matter Indirect Detection

Carsten Rott. mps. ohio-state. edu. (for the IceCube Collaboration)

Searches for electroweak production of supersymmetric gauginos and sleptons with the ATLAS detector

Introducing SModelS - with an application to light neutralino DM

Supersymmetry at the ILC

The inert doublet model in light of LHC and XENON

SUSY Phenomenology & Experimental searches

Search for Dark Matter in the mono-x* final states with ATLAS

Dark Matter Searches. Marijke Haffke University of Zürich

Cosmic Antiproton and Gamma-Ray Constraints on Effective Interaction of the Dark matter

A halo-independent lower bound on the DM capture rate in the Sun from a DD signal

Indirect detection of Dark Matter with the ANTARES Neutrino Telescope

Interconnection between Particle Physics and Cosmology at the LHC

PAMELA from Dark Matter Annihilations to Vector Leptons

Direct Detection Rates of Neutralino WIMP in MSSM

Introduction to Class and Dark Matter

Dark Matter Searches in CMS. Ashok Kumar Delhi University - Delhi

Fermionic DM Higgs Portal! An EFT approach

Antiproton Limits on Decaying Gravitino Dark Matter

Supersymmetry Basics. J. Hewett SSI J. Hewett

Probing Dark Matter at the LHC

SUSY or not, what is the evidence? Status and perspectives of collider searches Part III

Transcription:

pmssm Dark Matter Searches On Ice! χ ~ 0 1 Randy Cotta (Stanford/SLAC) In collaboration with: K.T.K. Howe (Stanford) J.L. Hewett (SLAC) T.G. Rizzo (SLAC) Based on: 1104.XXXX (next week or bust.)

In case the title slide wasn t self-explanatory We ll recall the solar WIMP idea, and the IceCube/DeepCore (IC/DC) search for energetic ν s produced in solar WIMP annihilation. Investigate supersymmetry predictions for signal using tens of thousands of SUSY models from the p(henomenological)mssm. Prospects for IC/DC to constrain/discover pmssm dark matter, Compare the performance of the IC/DC search with Direct Detection experiments and LHC analyses.

The Solar DM Search

Annihilations from Captured WIMPs* WIMPs in Milky Way DM halo scatter off of nuclei in the sun, become trapped in bound orbits and sink to the solar core. This population of WIMPs is also depleted by annihilation: C c ~ (a SI σ SI + a SD σ SD )*ρ χ,halo Solar WIMPs: Solution: N(t) with: τ eq = (C a C c ) -1/2, τ ~ 4*10 9 yr C a ~ <σv>*ρ 2 In Equilibrium: Γ a ~ C c /2 ~ σ elastic Depends only on elastic cross-section, not <σv>. * Press, Spergel (1985); Silk, Olive, Srednicki (1986)

The IceCube-DeepCore Solar DM Search Annihilations of these solar WIMPs inject >1 GeV ν s that propagate out of the sun to neutrino detectors on earth. IceCube+DeepCore (IC/DC) observes >10 GeV ν s with spatial resolution necessary to observe an excess of <~100 events/yr correlated with the sun. The search we discuss here requires ~5 years of useable data, taken over ~10 years. The full IC/DC detector is currently being commissioned IC/DC description: see e.g., 0907.2263

SUSY Without Prejudice M LSP C.F. Berger, J.S. Gainer, J.L. Hewett, T.G. Rizzo Scan Ranges: 0812.0980 # Models M_χ i (GeV) LSP Composition # Models Ωh 2 LSP >= 0.1 (Ωh 2 LSP ~ Ωh2 WMAP ) Ωh 2 LSP

LSP Relic Density We always assume thermal WIMP freeze-out. Many of the LSPs in our set have depleted DM abundance (Ωh 2 LSP < Ωh2 WMAP ) so we must be careful to scale observables by the appropriate power of R = (Ωh 2 LSP / Ωh2 WMAP ), i.e., In Equilibrium: Γ a ~ C c /2= (1/2)*(a SI σ SI + a SD σ SD )*ρ χ,halo with ρ χ,halo =R*ρ 0 and ρ 0 ~ 0.3 GeV/cm 3 Although IceCube observes annihilating WIMPs, the signals scale as σ elastic *R like terrestrial direct detection experiments (CDMS, COUPP, etc.) and NOT as <σv>*r 2 like other searches for DM annihilation (FERMI, HESS, PAMELA, etc.).

Calculating IC/DC ν rates from the pmssm Raw ν spectra calculated for each pmssm model using DarkSUSY 5.0.5. Raw spectra are convolved with preliminary detector effective areas: Accurate estimates for discovery/ exclusion significance are difficult. Detected rates Φ D ν ~ {10-100} events/yr are plausible. We take Φ D ν>40 events/yr as a criterion for exclusion and Φ D ν>100 events/yr as a criterion for discovery.

Basic Results

Signal Rate vs. LSP Mass: Log 10 [Detected Signal Rate /yr] Exclusion Estimate LSP Mass (GeV) LSP Mass (GeV) Grey Points: All flat-prior pmssm models. (~ 63.4k models) Blue Points: Ωh 2 LSP >= 0.1 models (1240 models) Orange Points: 2Γ a /C c < 0.9 (Out-of-Equilbrium models ~ 4500 )

Flat vs. Log Priors Exclusion Estimate Log 10 [Detected Signal Rate /yr] LSP Mass (GeV) # Models Log 10 [Detected Signal Rate /yr] Grey points: all flat-prior mods. Black points: all log-prior mods. Flat- and log-prior predictions are similar. 22% of flat-prior mods and 25% of log-prior mods would be excluded.

Low Relic Density and Out-of-Eq. Models All Flat Mods (Grey), Excluded Mods (Red) Ωh 2 LSP Ωh 2 WMAP Models Out-of-Equilibrium Mods # Models # Models Log 10 (Ωh 2 LSP / Ωh2 WMAP ) Log 10 (2Γ a /C c ) IC/DC search is able to exclude DM, even with very low relic density. Out-of-Equilibrium Models are hard to exclude.

SUSY Model Dependence

The Magnitude of the Signal ν Spectra Determined by the capture rate (C c ), and thus by the thermal elastic scattering cross sections (σ SI *R, σ SD *R): C c = (a SI σ SI + a SD σ SD )*R*ρ 0 R = (Ωh 2 LSP / Ωh2 WMAP ), ρ 0 ~ 0.3 GeV/cm 3 Although spin-independent χ-n A scattering is coherent (σ χ-n A ~ A2 ), heavy elements are rare compared to H nuclei in the sun. When it comes to C c we see: a SD (10 2-3 )*a SI Log 10 [ σ SD *R (pb) ] Excluded (Red), Non-Excluded (Blue) Log 10 [ σ SI *R (pb) ]

The Shape of the Signal ν Spectra All Flat Mods Mostly ttbar The IC/DC effective area is sharply dependent on the rigidity of the spectra. Spectral Shape is determined by the annihilation rates into various Standard Model final states. (Detected Flux)/(Raw Flux) Mostly τ+τ- Mostly W+W- Mostly bbbar W+W- / ZZ Mix Different final states can see very different effective areas. LSP Mass (GeV)

LSP Composition Since overall signal rates depend on σ SI, σ SD, R and the annihilation rates into SM final states it is useful to classify our models by LSP composition. We see: Pure Winos/Higgsinos are hard to see (relic density) # Models h,h σ SI Higgsino ~ q # Models Z Wino σ SD ~ q Bino predictions vary a lot b/c they depend on (scanned) sfermion masses Bino Exclusion Estimate Mixed Mixed LSPs (often B-H) typically have large rates (high relic density + hard f.s. channels). # Models # Models Log 10 [Detected Rate yr -1 ]

Comparing With Other Experiments

Direct Detection, σ SD : IC/DC Excluded (Red), IC/DC Non-Excluded (Blue) Log 10 [ σ SD *R (pb) ] Log 10 [ σ SD *R (pb) ] LSP Mass (GeV) LSP Mass (GeV) * ν telescope limits assume (i) Equilibrium, (ii) Ωh 2 LSP = Ωh 2 WMAP and (iii) annihilations into hard (WW, ZZ, ττ) or soft (qq) SM channels, as noted. AMANDA* (Hard, Current) AMANDA* (Soft, Current) IceCube-22* (Hard, Current) IceCube-22* (Soft, Current) IceCube/DeepCore* (Hard, Future) COUPP 4kg (Current) COUPP 60kg 1yr (Future) COUPP 500kg 1yr (Future)

Direct Detection, σ SI : IC/DC Excluded (Red), IC/DC Non-Excluded (Blue) Log 10 [ σ SI *R (pb) ] Log 10 [ σ SI *R (pb) ] Forget this projection >>>>> This is (roughly) the new limit >>>>> LSP Mass (GeV) CDMS (Current) XENON 100 (Current 2010) XENON 100 (Future) LUX (Future) SuperCDMS (Future) XENON 100 (Current 2011) LSP Mass (GeV) COUPP 60kg 1yr (Future) COUPP 500kg 1yr (Future)

LHC Searches (ATLAS 7TeV 1fb -1 4jet-0lepton): PASS = S/ B>5 (ATLAS), or Φ D ν<100 events/yr (IC/DC) FAIL = S/ B<5 (ATLAS), or Φ D ν<100 events/yr (IC/DC) Log 10 [ σ SD *R (pb) ] Log 10 [ σ SD *R (pb) ] IC/DC+LHC PASS IC/DC FAIL, LHC PASS Log 10 [ σ SD *R (pb) ] IC/DC PASS, LHC FAIL Log 10 [ σ SI *R (pb) ] Log 10 [ σ SI *R (pb) ] Log 10 [ σ SD *R (pb) ] IC/DC+LHC FAIL Log 10 [ σ SI *R (pb) ] Log 10 [ σ SI *R (pb) ]

Conclusions The IC/DC solar WIMP search can constrain/discover a large fraction of the SUSY DM models in our pmssm set. IC/DC appears competitive with near future SD-DD experiments (COUPP) in probing the pmssm. The IC/DC and SD-DD searches will have different signal and background systematics, providing a non-trivial cross-check. χ ~ 0 1 χ ~ 0 1 χ ~ 0 1 Thanks!!

Backup Slides

Elastic Cross-Sections Grey Points: All flat-prior pmssm models. Blue Points: Ωh 2 LSP >= 0.1 models Orange Points: 2Γ a /C c < 0.9 (Out-of-Equilbrium Models) Exclusion Estimate Log 10 [Detected Signal Rate /yr] Log 10 [ σ SI *R (pb) ] Log 10 [ σ SI *R (pb) ] σ SI σ SD Log 10 [ σ SD *R (pb) ] Log 10 [ σ SD *R (pb) ]

XENON 100 2011 limit IC/DC Excluded (Red), IC/DC Non-Excluded (Blue) Log Log 10 [ σ SI 10 [ σ SI *R *R (pb) (pb) ] ] Log 10 [ σ SI *R (pb) ] 1 zb = 10-9 pb LSP Mass (GeV) Log 10 [ σ SI *R (zb) ] LSP Mass (GeV) XENON limit is ~10-8 pb for most of our LSPs. This excludes ~16% of our Flat-prior models (~42% of WMAP saturating flat models). For illustration, if nuclear form factor uncertainties allow a factor of 2 in either direction, ~10% or ~25% of flat models would be excluded. Log performance is similar.

Coverage by Experiment. SI DD: SD DD: IceCube/DeepCore and COUPP 60kg are similarly capable. LHC:

Pure Final State Histograms

LSP Composition & Effective Area