PBL SCENARIO ON ACCELERATORS: SUMMARY

Similar documents
PBL (Problem-Based Learning) scenario for Accelerator Physics Mats Lindroos and E. Métral (CERN, Switzerland) Lund University, Sweden, March 19-23,

!"#$%$!&'()$"('*+,-')'+-$#..+/+,0)&,$%.1&&/$ LONGITUDINAL BEAM DYNAMICS

Beam Dynamics. D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Bruges June 2009 Beam Dynamics D. Brandt 1

TRAINING-WEEK IN ACCELERATOR PHYSICS

ACCELERATORS (2, 3 & 4/5)

D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Frascati 2008 Accelerators for Newcomers D. Brandt 1

Phase Space Study of the Synchrotron Oscillation and Radiation Damping of the Longitudinal and Transverse Oscillations

Longitudinal Dynamics

Transverse dynamics Selected topics. Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2016, v2.21

Engines of Discovery

Introduction to Collider Physics

50 MeV 1.4 GeV 25GeV 450 GeV 8 TeV. Sources of emittance growth CAS 07 Liverpool. Sept D. Möhl, slide 1

ACHIEVABLE SPACE-CHARGE TUNE SHIFT WITH LONG LIFETIME IN THE CERN PS & SPS

Small Synchrotrons. Michael Benedikt. CERN, AB-Department. CAS, Zeegse, 30/05/05 Small Synchrotrons M. Benedikt 1

Physics 610. Adv Particle Physics. April 7, 2014

3. Synchrotrons. Synchrotron Basics

E. Wilson - CERN. Components of a synchrotron. Dipole Bending Magnet. Magnetic rigidity. Bending Magnet. Weak focusing - gutter. Transverse ellipse

ELECTRON DYNAMICS WITH SYNCHROTRON RADIATION

Synchrotron Motion. RF cavities. Charged particles gain and lose energy in electric field via

Transverse dynamics. Transverse dynamics: degrees of freedom orthogonal to the reference trajectory

Low Emittance Machines

TUNE SPREAD STUDIES AT INJECTION ENERGIES FOR THE CERN PROTON SYNCHROTRON BOOSTER

Accelerator Physics Final Exam pts.

Longitudinal dynamics Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN

Tools of Particle Physics I Accelerators

Introduction to Accelerators

CERN Accelerator School. Intermediate Accelerator Physics Course Chios, Greece, September Low Emittance Rings

!"#$%$!&'()$"('*+,-')'+-$#..+/+,0)&,$%.1&&/$ LONGITUDINAL BEAM DYNAMICS

Introduction to particle accelerators

The FAIR Accelerator Facility

Low Emittance Machines

Compressor Ring. Contents Where do we go? Beam physics limitations Possible Compressor ring choices Conclusions. Valeri Lebedev.

1.5-GeV FFAG Accelerator as Injector to the BNL-AGS

Bernhard Holzer, CERN-LHC

Theory English (Official)

Accelerator Physics Homework #3 P470 (Problems: 1-5)

Introduction to Transverse Beam Dynamics

LONGITUDINAL DYNAMICS OF PARTICLES IN ACCELERATORS. Author: Urša Rojec Mentor: Simon Širca. Ljubljana, November 2012

Compressor Lattice Design for SPL Beam

Accelerator Physics. Tip World Scientific NEW JERSEY LONDON SINGAPORE BEIJING SHANGHAI HONG KONG TAIPEI BANGALORE. Second Edition. S. Y.

Introduction to Longitudinal Beam Dynamics

Accelerator. Physics of PEP-I1. Lecture #7. March 13,1998. Dr. John Seeman

LHC Luminosity and Energy Upgrade

SPACE CHARGE EXPERIMENTS AND BENCHMARKING IN THE PS

An Introduction to Particle Accelerators. v short

Introduction to Accelerators. Scientific Tools for High Energy Physics and Synchrotron Radiation Research

Physics at Accelerators

Accelerator Physics. Elena Wildner. Transverse motion. Benasque. Acknowldements to Simon Baird, Rende Steerenberg, Mats Lindroos, for course material

First propositions of a lattice for the future upgrade of SOLEIL. A. Nadji On behalf of the Accelerators and Engineering Division

10 GeV Synchrotron Longitudinal Dynamics

Particle physics experiments

The LHC: the energy, cooling, and operation. Susmita Jyotishmati

Low energy electron storage ring with tunable compaction factor

Proposal to convert TLS Booster for hadron accelerator

THE PS IN THE LHC INJECTOR CHAIN

Medical Linac. Block diagram. Electron source. Bending magnet. Accelerating structure. Klystron or magnetron. Pulse modulator.

RF LINACS. Alessandra Lombardi BE/ ABP CERN

NOVEL METHOD FOR MULTI-TURN EXTRACTION: TRAPPING CHARGED PARTICLES IN ISLANDS OF PHASE SPACE

Linac JUAS lecture summary

Basic Mathematics and Units

Beam Diagnostics Lecture 3. Measuring Complex Accelerator Parameters Uli Raich CERN AB-BI

A Project to convert TLS Booster to hadron accelerator 1. Basic design. 2. The injection systems:

Physics 598ACC Accelerators: Theory and Applications

Start-to-end beam optics development and multi-particle tracking for the ILC undulator-based positron source*

ULTIMATE LHC BEAM. G. Arduini, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland

Run2 Problem List (Bold-faced items are those the BP Department can work on) October 4, 2002

Lattice Design for the Taiwan Photon Source (TPS) at NSRRC

The TESLA Dogbone Damping Ring

Transverse Beam Dynamics II

Lattice Design in Particle Accelerators

Physics 663. Particle Physics Phenomenology. April 9, Physics 663, lecture 2 1

Putting it all together

3. Particle accelerators

COMBINER RING LATTICE

Why do we accelerate particles?

Overview of LHC Accelerator

Magnets and Lattices. - Accelerator building blocks - Transverse beam dynamics - coordinate system

CERN EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH THE CLIC POSITRON CAPTURE AND ACCELERATION IN THE INJECTOR LINAC

Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes. A New Structure for the NLC Positron Predamping Ring Lattice

Beam Dynamics in Synchrotrons with Space- Charge

Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes

Accelerators. Lecture V. Oliver Brüning. school/lecture5

Advanced Design of the FAIR Storage Ring Complex

Historical developments. of particle acceleration

Accelerators. There are some accelerators around the world Nearly all are for industrial (20 000) or clinical use (10 000)

arxiv: v1 [physics.acc-ph] 21 Oct 2014

ELECTRON DYNAMICS with SYNCHROTRON RADIATION

Transverse Dynamics II

LHC operation in 2015 and prospects for the future

Short Introduction to CLIC and CTF3, Technologies for Future Linear Colliders

Synchrotron Motion with Space-Charge

Raising intensity of the LHC beam in the SPS - longitudinal plane

Longitudinal Top-up Injection for Small Aperture Storage Rings

LIS section meeting. PS2 design status. Y. Papaphilippou. April 30 th, 2007

A Proposal of Harmonictron

Introductory slides: Ferrite. Ferrite

ELIC: A High Luminosity And Efficient Spin Manipulation Electron-Light Ion Collider Based At CEBAF

ACCELERATION, DECELERATION AND BUNCHING OF STORED AND COOLED ION BEAMS AT THE TSR, HEIDELBERG

SIMULATION STUDY FOR MEIC ELECTRON COOLING*

The Relativistic Stern-Gerlach Interaction as a Tool for Attaining the Spin Separation

Transcription:

PBL SCENARIO ON ACCELERATORS: SUMMARY Elias Métral Elias.Metral@cern.ch Tel.: 72560 or 164809 CERN accelerators and CERN Control Centre Machine luminosity Transverse beam dynamics + space charge Longitudinal beam dynamics Solution of the transverse problem Solution of the longitudinal problem Synchrotron radiation Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 1/40

Duoplasmatron = Source î 90 kev (kinetic energy) LINAC2 = Linear accelerator î 50 MeV PSBooster = Proton Synchrotron Booster î 1.4 GeV PS = Proton Synchrotron î 25 GeV SPS = Super Proton Synchrotron î 450 GeV LHC = Large Hadron Collider î 7 TeV Linear accelerator Transfer line Ejection Injection LHC beam Circular accelerator (Synchrotron) Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 2/40

PS Booster (after the wall) PS Linac2 PS tunnel SPS tunnel What happens to the particles inside the vacuum chamber? Vacuum chamber (f = 13 cm here) TT2 transfer line tunnel LHC tunnel Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 3/40

CERN Control Centre (CCC) Island for the PS comple Island for the Technical Infrastructure + LHC cryogenics Island for the LHC ENTRANCE Island for the SPS Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 4/40

MACHINE LUMINOSITY (1/3) Book p. 162 + Ref. [5] L = N events /second σ event Number of events per second generated in the collisions [cm -2 s -1 ] Cross-section for the event under study The Luminosity depends only on the beam parameters It is independent of the physical reaction Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 5/40

MACHINE LUMINOSITY (2/3) For a Gaussian (round) beam distribution Number of particles per bunch Number of bunches per beam L = 2 Nb M frev γ r * 4 π ε β n F Revolution frequency Relativistic velocity factor Normalized transverse beam emittance β-function at the collision point Geometric reduction factor due to the crossing angle at the IP PEAK LUMINOSITY for ATLAS&CMS in the LHC = L peak = 10 34 cm -2 s -1 Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 6/40

MACHINE LUMINOSITY (3/3) INTEGRATED LUMINOSITY Lint = L ( t )dt 0 T The real figure of merit = Lint σ event = number of events LHC integrated Luminosity epected per year: [80-120] fb -1 Reminder: 1 barn = 10-24 cm 2 and femto = 10-15 Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 7/40

Book p. 22 to 57 + Ref. [5] TRANSVERSE BEAM DYNAMICS (1/16) Single-particle trajectory One particle ϑ Circular design orbit In the middle of the vacuum chamber The motion of a charged particle (proton) in a beam transport channel or a circular accelerator is governed by the LORENTZ FORCE r F = e r ( E + v B ) The motion of particle beams under the influence of the Lorentz force is called BEAM OPTICS Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 8/40 r r

TRANSVERSE BEAM DYNAMICS (2/16) The Lorentz force is applied as a BENDING FORCE (using DIPOLES) to guide the particles along a predefined ideal path, the DESIGN ORBIT, on which ideally all particles should move FOCUSING FORCE (using QUADRUPOLES) to confine the particles in the vicinity of the ideal path, from which most particles will unavoidably deviate LATTICE = Arrangement of magnets along the design orbit The ACCELERATOR DESIGN is made considering the beam as a collection of non-interacting single particles Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 9/40

TRANSVERSE BEAM DYNAMICS (3/16) g g y Beam DIPOLE = Bending magnet S-pole B N-pole Bend magnet B F Constant force in and 0 force in y v ρ ( s ) Design orbit s A particle, with a constant energy, describes a circle in equilibrium between the centripetal magnetic force and the centrifugal force [ ] [ ] BEAM RIGIDITY B ρ m = 3.3356 p GeV / c T 0 Magnetic field Curvature radius of the dipoles Beam momentum Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 10/40

N-pole S-pole y TRANSVERSE BEAM DYNAMICS (4/16) QUADRUPOLE = Focusing magnet S-pole Beam N-pole Beam In (and Defocusing in y) F-type. Permuting the N- and S- poles gives a D-type Linear force in &y ( s ) + K ( ) = 0 s : Equation of a harmonic oscillator From this equation, one can already anticipate the elliptical shape of the particle trajectory in the phase space (, ) by integration ( ) 2 s + K ( ) = Constant 2 s Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 11/40

TRANSVERSE BEAM DYNAMICS (5/16) Along the accelerator K is not constant and depends on s (and is periodic) The equation of motion is then called HILL S EQUATION The solution of the Hill s equation is a pseudo-harmonic oscillation with varying amplitude and frequency called BETATRON OSCILLATION An invariant, i.e. a constant of motion, (called COURANT-SNYDER INVARIANT) can be found from the solution of the Hill s equation Equation of an ellipse (motion for one particle) in the phase space plane (, ), with area π a 2 Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 12/40

TRANSVERSE BEAM DYNAMICS (6/16) ( s) ( s) aα(s) β(s) γ(s) a γ(s) aα(s) β(s) ( s) Courtesy M. Martini α ( s) β ( s) γ ( s) are called TWISS PARAMETERS The shape and orientation of the phase plane ellipse evolve along the machine, but not its area Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 13/40

TRANSVERSE BEAM DYNAMICS (7/16) Stroboscopic representation or POINCARÉ MAPPING ( s) ) s 0 (( s ) s 0 Depends on the TUNE = Q = Number of betatron oscillations per machine revolution Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 14/40

TRANSVERSE BEAM DYNAMICS (8/16) MATRIX FORMALISM: The previous (linear) equipments of the accelerator (etending from s 0 to s) can be described by a matri, M (s / s 0 ), called TRANSFER MATRIX, which relates (, ) at s 0 and (, ) at s ( s ) = M ( s / s ) ( s ) 0 ( ) 0 s 0 ( s ) The transfer matri over one revolution period is then the product of the individual matrices composing the machine The transfer matri over one period is called the TWISS MATRIX Once the Twiss matri has been derived the Twiss parameters can be obtained at any point along the machine Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 15/40

Book p. 62 to 67 + Ref. [5] TRANSVERSE BEAM DYNAMICS (9/16) In practice, particle beams have a finite dispersion of momenta about the ideal momentum p 0. A particle with momentum p π p 0 will perform betatron oscillations around A DIFFERENT CLOSED ORBIT from that of the reference particle Displacement of Δ p p ( ) ( ) 0 s = D s = D ( s ) 0 p Δp p 0 D ( s ) is called the DISPERSION FUNCTION Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 16/40

TRANSVERSE BEAM DYNAMICS (10/16) BEAM EMITTANCE = Measure of the spread in phase space of the points representing beam particles 3 definitions 1) In terms of the phase plane amplitude a q enclosing q % of the particles ( q% ) ellipse of "amplitude" a d d = π q 2) In terms of the 2 nd moments of the particle distribution ε [mm mrad] or [μm] ε ( stat ) 2 2 2 < >< > < > Determinant of the covariance matri 3) In terms of σ the standard deviation of the particle distribution in real space (= projection onto the -ais) 2 ( ) ε σ β Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 17/40 σ

TRANSVERSE BEAM DYNAMICS (11/16) FAST WIRE SCANNER Measures the transverse beam profiles by detecting the particles scattered from a thin wire swept rapidly through the beam HORIZONTAL PROFILE 1000 Gaussian fit 800 600 400 200 σ 2 ( ) ε σ β Courtesy S. Gilardoni -30-20 - 10 10 20 30 POSITION @mmd Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 18/40

TRANSVERSE BEAM DYNAMICS (12/16) = γ A ( ) ( q% s ) 0 ε ( s ) 0 0 ( s ) 0 particle with amplitude ε a = ( q εq % a = ) q ε ( ) s 0 a q Emittance Beam divergence particle distribution β 0 ( ) ( q% ) s0 ε = E ( s0 ) The β-function reflects the size of the beam and depends only on the lattice Beam envelope Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 19/40

TRANSVERSE BEAM DYNAMICS (13/16) MACHINE mechanical (i.e. from the vacuum chamber) ACCEPTANCE or APERTURE = Maimum beam emittance NORMALIZED BEAM EMITTANCE ( σ ) ( σ ) ε = β, norm r γ r ε Relativistic factors The normalized emittance is conserved during acceleration (in the absence of collective effects ) ADIABATIC DAMPING: As β r g r increases proportionally to the particle momentum p, the (physical) emittance decreases as 1 / p However, many phenomena may affect (increase) the emittance An important challenge in accelerator technology is to preserve beam emittance and even to reduce it (by COOLING) Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 20/40

TRANSVERSE BEAM DYNAMICS (14/16) BETATRON MATCHING = The phase space ellipses at the injection (ejection) point of the circular machine, and the eit (entrance) of the beam transport line, should be homothetic. To do this, the Twiss parameters are modified using quadrupoles. If the ellipses are not homothetic, there will be a dilution (i.e. a BLOW-UP) of the emittance Courtesy D. Möhl Form of matched ellipse Unmatched beam Filamenting beam Fully filamented beam DISPERSION MATCHING = D and D should be the same at the injection (ejection) point of the circular machine, and the eit (entrance) of the beam transport line. If there are different, there will be also a BLOW-UP, but due to a missteering (because the beam is not injected on the right orbit) Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 21/40

TRANSVERSE BEAM DYNAMICS (15/16) In the presence of etra (NONLINEAR) FORCES, the Hill s equation takes the general form ( s ) + K ( s) ( s ) = P (, y s ), Any perturbation Perturbation terms in the equation of motion may lead to UNSTABLE motion, called RESONANCES, when the perturbating field acts in synchronism with the particle oscillations Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 22/40

TRANSVERSE BEAM DYNAMICS (16/16) General RESONANCE CONDITIONS M Q + N Q P y = Book p. 88-89 + Ref. [5] where M, N and P are integers, P being non-negative, M + N is the order of the resonance and P is the order of the perturbation harmonic Plotting the resonance lines for different values of M, N, and P in the (Q, Q y ) plane yields the so-called RESONANCE or TUNE DIAGRAM This dot in the tune diagram is called the WORKING POINT (case of the PS, here) Qy y 6.5 6.4 6.3 6.2 6.1 Q 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 Q Each line has a finite width, proportional to the strength of the imperfection which drives it The dot is in fact not a dot because all the particles do not have eactly the same tune î There is a tune spread Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 23/40

Very important effect for LINAC2, PSB and PS! SPACE CHARGE (1/4) Book p. 124 to 126 + Ref. [5] 2 particles at rest or travelling β r Courtesy K. Schindl Many charged particles travelling in an unbunched beam with circular cross-section Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 24/40

SPACE CHARGE (2/4) Quadrupole (F-type) Uniform Gaussian Proton Beam Focusing Linear Defocusing Linear Defocusing Non-Linear Courtesy K. Schindl Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 25/40

SPACE CHARGE (3/4) INCOHERENT (single-particle) tunes Low-intensity 2D tune footprint working point 3D tune footprint Q 64.3086 64.3088 64.309 64.3092 64.3094 64.3096 64.3098 59.3198 Small-amplitude particles = N Δ0 b 2 norm βr γ r ε rms 59.3196 59.3194 59.3192 59.3188 59.3186 Q y Large-amplitude 59.319 particles Linear space - charge tune shift Q 64.3086 64.3088 64.309 64.3092 64.3094 64.3096 64.3098 59.3198 59.3196 59.3194 59.3192 59.319 Large- 59.3188 (synchrotron) amplitude 59.3186 particles Q yy Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 26/40

SPACE CHARGE (4/4) Qy Q vy 6.2 6.1 5.9 6.1 6.2 5.9 Q Q y Case 1 6.16 6.24 Q Q h Horizontal bunch profile + Gaussian fit 800 600 Qy Q vy 6.2 6.1 Q 400 Case 3 200 6.11 Qy 6.24-40 -20 20 40 [mm] 5.9 6.1 6.2 5.9 Q Q h σ 2 ( ) ε σ β Emittance blow-up Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 27/40

LONGITUDINAL BEAM DYNAMICS (1/8) The electric field is used to accelerate or decelerate the particles, and is produced by one or more RF (Radio-Frequency) CAVITIES r [m] Book p. 58 to 73 + Ref. [5] e - s [m] Courtesy L. Rinolfi Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 28/40

2 ferrite loaded cylinders that permit the cavity to be tuned LONGITUDINAL BEAM DYNAMICS (2/8) 10 MHz RF cavity in Straight Section (SS) 11 of the PS For the acceleration Accelerating gap Final power amplifier Si 200 MHz in SS6 RF gymnastics 13 MHz in SS92 40 MHz in SS78 80 MHz in SS13 World Radio Geneva: 88.4 MHz Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 29/40

LONGITUDINAL BEAM DYNAMICS (3/8) TRANSITION ENERGY: The increase of energy has 2 contradictory effects An increase of the particle s velocity An increase of the length of the particle s trajectory According to the variations of these 2 parameters, the revolution frequency evolves differently Below transition energy: The velocity increases faster than the length The revolution frequency increases Above transition energy: It is the opposite case The revolution frequency decreases At transition energy: The variation of the velocity is compensated by the variation of the trajectory A variation of energy does not modify the frequency Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 30/40

LONGITUDINAL BEAM DYNAMICS (4/8) Sinusoidal voltage applied V V sinφ ( t) ΔE = e Vˆ φ 1 RF sin RF BUNCHED beam in a stationary BUCKET V RF 1 ˆ ω hω = RF RF RF rev ΔE Harmonic number SYNCHROTRON OSCILLATION (here, below transition) = φ RF Vˆ RF φ 1RF TUNE Q z (<< 1) Harmonic oscillator for the small amplitudes φ RF = ω RF RF ω RF t Synchronous particle Courtesy L. Rinolfi Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 31/40

LONGITUDINAL BEAM DYNAMICS (5/8) Synchrotron oscillation during acceleration (below transition) φ Above transition, the stable phase is 1 = φs π φs Synchronous phase 0 V RF Vˆ RF φ RF Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 32/40 Courtesy L. Rinolfi

LONGITUDINAL BEAM DYNAMICS (6/8) V RF Courtesy L. Rinolfi φ RF SEPARATRIX = Limit between the stable and unstable regions Determines the RF BUCKET Accelerating bucket The number of buckets is given by h φ RF Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 33/40

LONGITUDINAL BEAM DYNAMICS (7/8) ( ) 2 t + ω ( ) = 0 τ t s τ : Equation of a harmonic oscillator ω s t = time interval between the passage of the synchronous particle and the particle under consideration = η cosφ Vˆ 2π β 2 r s RF h ω rev ( E / e) η = γ 2 tr = momentum compaction factor a p γ 2 = ( ΔT / T0 )/( Δp / p0) Qz = ωs ω rev : Synchrotron tune Slip factor (sometimes defined with a negative sign ) Number of synchrotron oscillations per machine revolution Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 34/40

LONGITUDINAL BEAM DYNAMICS (8/8) Longitudinal bunch profile Projection Surface = Longitudinal EMITTANCE of the bunch = ε L [ev.s] [MeV] Projection Longitudinal energy profile Surface = Longitudinal ACCEPTANCE of the bucket [ns] Courtesy S. Hancock Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 35/40

SOLUTION OF THE TRANSVERSE PROBLEM (1/2) Doubling the peak luminosity î Increasing the intensity (per bunch) by 2, i.e. by ~ 40% î The space charge tune spread is increased by 40% (assuming the same transverse emittance) Losses are observed and reduced by tuning the working point î The space charge tune spread can be placed in a better position in the tune diagram where it overlaps less dangerous resonances The losses did not disappear completely î See net (real) picture. One has either to reduce the density N b / e n or compensate the resonances if one wants to suppress these losses The transverse emittances still have to be checked î Because, as seen before, some resonances can lead to emittance blow-up and emittance blow-up leads to less luminosity Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 36/40

protons per pulse SOLUTION OF THE TRANSVERSE PROBLEM (2/2) LHC beam in the PS PS magnetic field for the LHC beam 1 Tesla = 10 4 Gauss 10 LOSSES! 14000 INTENSITY [10 12 ppp] 8 6 4 2 2 nd Injection (1370) 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 B [Gauss] 0 0 150 650 1150 1650 2150 1 st Injection (170) TIME IN THE CYCLE [ms] Ejection (2395) Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 37/40

SOLUTION OF THE LONGITUDINAL PROBLEM 1) Are the 1020 Gauss OK? - This is the very important formula of the beam rigidity which has to be used here. It is given by B [ T] ρ [m] = 3.3356 p[gev/c]. The numerical application yields B = 1020 Gauss. The value given is good and therefore this is the RF voltage which is not the good one. Why? If the longitudinal emittance of the beam sent to the SPS is too large and the RF voltage at PS injection is not the good one, it means that the blow-up of the longitudinal emittance is due to a longitudinal mismatch between the PSB and the PS 2) We know that the 60 kv is not the good value. What is the good one? - In a stationary bucket (as it is the case in the PS at injection), the synchronous phase below transition energy is Φ s = 0. Therefore, the bucket (half) height ΔEma is given by the formula with F = 2. Concerning the bucket (half) length Δ tma, it is also given by the formula with ˆ φ = π in a stationary bucket. - The longitudinal matching condition between the PSB and PS is given by ΔE Δt ma ma PS = ΔE Δt ma ma PSB. As the beam energy is the same at etraction of the PSB and injection in the PS, this leads to Vˆ PS RF = Vˆ PSB RF η η PS PSB h h PSB PS R R PS PSB 2. The numerical application gives ˆ PS V RF = 25 kv. The RF voltage should therefore be 25 kv and not 60 kv. With 60 kv the beam coming from the PSB is not matched longitudinally. It will start to oscillate in the RF bucket finding after some time a new matching condition but with a larger longitudinal emittance, as observed by the SPS operator Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 38/40

SYNCHROTRON RADIATION (1/2) Book p. 111 to 122 Power radiated by a particle (due to bending) P = q 2 c 4 β E 4 2 4 6 π ε 0 ρ E0 Curvature radius of the dipoles Particle total energy Particle rest energy Energy radiated in one ring revolution U = Average (over the ring circumference) power radiation Revolution period 0 2 3 4 q β E 3 ε E ρ 0 4 0 P av = U T 0 0 Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 39/40

SYNCHROTRON RADIATION (2/2) r [m] p 0 [GeV/c] U 0 LEP 3096.175 104 3.3 GeV LHC 2803.95 7000 6.7 kev The RF system had therefore to compensate for an energy lost of ~3% of the total beam energy per turn! The total average (over the ring circumference) power radiation (per beam) is 3.9 kw (2808 bunches of 1.15 10 11 protons) Elias Métral, PBL course: summary, Lund, Sweden, 19-23/03/07 40/40