Measurement of emittance with the MICE scintillating fibre trackers

Similar documents
Emittance Measurement in the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment

Measurement of emittance in the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment

PoS(EPS-HEP2015)522. The status of MICE Step IV

MICE: The Trackers and Magnets

MEASUREMENT OF PHASE SPACE DENSITY EVOLUTION IN MICE

PoS(NuFact2017)099. Measurement of Phase Space Density Evolution in MICE. François Drielsma. MICE Collaboration

Ionization Cooling Demonstration

Measurements of the Multiple Coulomb Scattering of Muons by MICE

RECENT RESULTS FROM MICE ON MULTIPLE COULOMB SCATTERING AND ENERGY LOSS

Demonstrating 6D Cooling. Guggenheim Channel Simulations

Recent results from MICE on multiple Coulomb scattering and energy loss

Recent results from MICE on multiple Coulomb scattering and energy loss

State Machine Operation of the MICE Cooling Channel

High Precision Track Reconstruction and First Emittance Measurements in the MICE Step IV Cooling Channel

Measurement of the pion contamination in the MICE beam

The Reconstruction Software for the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Trackers

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Polyethylene Wedge Absorber in MICE

WEDGE ABSORBER DESIGN FOR THE MUON IONISATION COOLING EXPERIMENT

PoS(EPS-HEP2017)238. Experimental limiting factors for the next generation

arxiv: v4 [physics.acc-ph] 12 Jun 2018

arxiv:hep-ex/ v1 19 Jun 2004

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland. First Physics at CMS

Validation of Geant4 Physics Models Using Collision Data from the LHC

NA62: Ultra-Rare Kaon Decays

PoS(ICHEP2016)293. The LArIAT experiment and the charged pion total interaction cross section results on liquid argon. Animesh Chatterjee

MuSIC- RCNP at Osaka University

Analysis of muon and electron neutrino charged current interactions in the T2K near detectors

MICE-NOTE-DET-388. Geant4 Simulation of the EMR Detector Response Study

arxiv:hep-ex/ v1 15 Oct 2004

Full-Acceptance Detector Integration at MEIC

Superconducting Magnet with a Minimal Steel Yoke for the Future Circular Collider Detector

Compact Muon Production and Collection Scheme for High- Energy Physics Experiments

Pros and Cons of the Acceleration Scheme (NF-IDS)

Muon reconstruction performance in ATLAS at Run-2

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 1 Sep 2009

The HARP Experiment. G. Vidal-Sitjes (INFN-Ferrara) on behalf of the HARP Collaboration

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF FUTURE MUON COLLIDER*

Polarized muon decay asymmetry measurement: status and challenges

PoS(HCP2009)042. Status of the ALICE Experiment. Werner Riegler. For the ALICE Collaboration. CERN

IPBI-TN June 30, 2004

6 Bunch Compressor and Transfer to Main Linac

Theory English (Official)

Non-collision Background Monitoring Using the Semi-Conductor Tracker of ATLAS at LHC

Update on MOMENT s Target Station Studies

The High-Power-Target System of a Muon Collider or Neutrino Factory

Recent results at the -meson region from the CMD-3 detector at the VEPP-2000 collider

Tools of Particle Physics I Accelerators

New Limits on Heavy Neutrino from NA62

New Hadroproduction results from the HARP/PS214 experiment at CERN PS

Beam at the Paul Scherrer Institut

The Compact Muon Beam Line

Search for an electric dipole moment with polarized beams in storage rings

Muon Front-End without Cooling

OPTIMIZED CAPTURE MECHANISM FOR A MUON COLLIDER/ NEUTRINO FACTORY TARGET SYSTEM. HISHAM SAYED 1 X. Ding 2, H. Kirk 1, K.

PoS(NOW2016)003. T2K oscillation results. Lorenzo Magaletti. INFN Sezione di Bari

The Reconstruction Software for the MICE Scintillating Fibre Trackers

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland. Commissioning of the CMS Detector

Neutrinos Induced Pion Production in MINERvA

Time-like Compton Scattering with transversely polarized target

High-energy Gamma Rays detection with the AMS-02 electromagnetic calorimeter. F. Pilo for the AMS-02 ECAL Group INFN Sezione di Pisa, Italy

ELIC: A High Luminosity And Efficient Spin Manipulation Electron-Light Ion Collider Based At CEBAF

C A SPECTROMETER FOR MEASURING INELASTIC SECONDARIES FROM 200 GeV Ie, p-p COLLISIONS. T. O. White National Accelerator Laboratory

First neutrino beam and cosmic tracks. GDR neutrino

NEW TECHNOLOGY IN HYDROGEN ABSORBERS FOR MUON COOLING CHANNELS

The Mu2e Transport Solenoid

SLS at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland

HERMES at HERA: Quark-Gluon Spin Structure of the Nucleon

HELICAL COOLING CHANNEL PROGRESS*

Tracking at the LHC. Pippa Wells, CERN

Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes. Design Studies of Positron Collection for the NLC

The reaction p(e,e'p)π 0 to calibrate the Forward and the Large Angle Electromagnetic Shower Calorimeters

EP228 Particle Physics

The SHiP experiment. Colloquia: IFAE A. Paoloni( ) on behalf of the SHiP Collaboration. 1. Introduction

PoS(TIPP2014)093. Performance study of the TOP counter with the 2 GeV/c positron beam at LEPS. K. Matsuoka, For the Belle II PID group

Electromagnetic Calorimeter Calibration: Getting Rid of the Trash

Stathes D. Paganis Nevis Laboratories, Columbia University, Irvington NY, 10533, USA (On behalf of the ZEUS Collaboration)

Chapter 6.2: space based cosmic ray experiments. A. Zech, Instrumentation in High Energy Astrophysics

Particle Energy Loss in Matter

Compressor Lattice Design for SPL Beam

COMET muon conversion experiment in J-PARC

Hadron identification study at the CEPC

PIP-II Injector Test s Low Energy Beam Transport: Commissioning and Selected Measurements

Results and Status from HARP and MIPP

The MUon proton Scattering Experiment (MUSE) at the Paul Scherrer Institute

PoS(ICHEP2016)552. The Mu3e Experiment at PSI. Alessandro Bravar University of Geneva

Time-like Compton Scattering with transversely polarized target

CLAS12 at Jefferson Lab

Muon to Electron Conversion: Experimental Status in Japan and the US

Constraining the T2K Neutrino Flux Prediction with 2009 NA61/SHINE Replica-Target Data arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 1 Apr 2018

Tertiary particle production and target optimization of the H2 beam line in

Threshold photoproduction of J/y with the GlueX experiment. Lubomir Pentchev Jefferson Lab for the GlueX collaboration

HARP a hadron production experiment. Emilio Radicioni, INFN for the HARP collaboration

Kaon Identification at NA62. Institute of Physics Particle, Astroparticle, and Nuclear Physics groups Conference 2015

The Detector Design of the Jefferson Lab EIC

Recent Results from Alysia Marino, University of Colorado at Boulder Neutrino Flux Workshop, University of Pittsburgh, Dec 6 8,2012

Results from HARP. Malcolm Ellis On behalf of the HARP collaboration DPF Meeting Riverside, August 2004

Muon commissioning and Exclusive B production at CMS with the first LHC data

OPTIMIZATION OF COMPENSATION CHICANES IN THE LCLS-II BEAM DELIVERY SYSTEM

Particle Identification: Computer reconstruction of a UA1 event with an identified electron as a candidate for a W >eν event

Transcription:

Measurement of emittance with the MICE scintillating fibre trackers F. Drielsma on behalf of the MICE collaboration Department of Nuclear and Particle Physics, University of Geneva, 24 Quai Ernest-Ansermet, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland The Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) collaboration will demonstrate the feasibility of ionization cooling, the technique by which it is proposed to cool the muon beam at a future neutrino factory or muon collider. The muon beam emittance is measured on a particle-by-particle basis. Measurements are made before and after the cooling cell using a high precision scintillating-fibre tracker in a solenoid magnetic field. A pure muon sample is selected using a particle identification system that can reject pions and electrons efficiently. The emittance of the MICE Muon Beam has been measured for the first time with the scintillating-fibre tracking system using the October 215 commissioning data. The performance of the tracking and the analysis techniques required for this precision measurement are shown. The two spectrometers were powered together with the focus coil module in July 216 and muon tracks were measured up and downstream of the cooling cell. The expected emittance change to be observed for a specific lattice in the ongoing MICE Step IV is summarized. 1 Introduction Intense muon sources are required for a future Neutrino Factory or Muon Collider 1,2. At production, muons occupy a large phase-space volume (emittance), which makes them difficult to accelerate and store. Therefore, the emittance of the muon beams must be reduced, i.e the muons must be cooled, to maximise the muon flux delivered to the accelerator. Conventional cooling techniques applied to muon beams 3 would leave almost no muons to be accelerated since the muon lifetime is short (τµ 2.2 µs). Almost a factor of a million in 6D muon cooling has been achieved in a simulation 4 which shows that the ionization-cooling effect builds quickly enough to deliver the flux and emittance required by the Neutrino Factory and the Muon Collider. The rate of change in normalised emittance when passing through an absorber can be approximated by the following cooling equation dεn εn deµ β (.14)2 ' 2 + 3. ds β Eµ ds 2β Eµ mµ X (1) The cooling equation shows that low-z materials are preferred as they have a longer radiation length, X. The MICE collaboration will study the cooling equation in detail to demonstrate the feasibility of this technique 5. It will investigate LiH and liquid H2 absorbers as well as several input normalised emittance, N, magnetic lattices, β, and muon energy, Eµ.

MICE Muon Beam (MMB) Time-of-flight hodoscope 1 (ToF ) Variable thickness high-z diffuser Upstream spectrometer module Absorber/focus-coil module Downstream spectrometer module 7th February 215 Electron Muon Ranger (EMR) MICE Cherenkov counters (CKOV) ToF 1 Liquid-hydrogen absorber Scintillating-fibre trackers Pre-shower (KL) ToF 2 Figure 1 Schematics of the MICE experiment at present. The muons produced in the MICE Muon Beam line first pass through the upstream particle identification (PID) apparatus, are sampled up and downstream of the absorber by scintillating fibre trackers before being dumped in the downstream PID section. A schematic of the MICE experiment is shown in figure 1. The MICE Muon Beamline operates on the ISIS proton synchrotron at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory. A titanium target 6 samples the ISIS proton beam. The muons, product of the pion decays, are momentum selected by a pair of dipoles and transported by two triplets of quadrupoles. The resultant beam is propagated through time-of-flight counters, TOF and TOF1, and Cherenkov detectors, Ckov, to the cooling cell. The variable-thickness brass and tungsten diffuser allows tuning of the input emittance before the muons are measured in the upstream spectrometer solenoid using a scintillating-fibre tracker. The beam then passes through low-z absorbers prior to being remeasured in the downstream tracker. Upon exiting the cooling cell the beam is incident upon the final time-of-flight detector, TOF2, a pre-shower detector, KL, and a fully active trackercalorimeter, the Electron-Muon Ranger, EMR 7. 2 Single-particle measurement MICE is a single-particle experiment. The emittance reduction is reconstructed by measuring the phase-space vector (x, y, p x, p y, p z ) of each individual muon before and after going through the absorber. Tracks are accumulated into a beam ensemble during the analysis process to measure the change in normalised emittance. The single-particle nature allows for global track matching throughout the experiment, i.e. the ability to associate a trace measured in the upstream tracker with one in the downstream tracker but also with the PID detectors. Figure 2 shows the a two dimensional projection of 25 simulated muon trajectories going through the MICE experiment. Figure 2 Sample of 25 simulated virtual muon trajectories in the MICE. A tight focus, i.e. low β, can be clearly observed at the level of the absorber to minimize the heating term of the cooling equation. Two identical scintillating-fibre trackers are symmetrically arranged about the absorber in uniform 4T fields. They each consist of five stations that sample the position of the muon track with 661 ± 2 µm accuracy 8. Particles were measured in the upstream tracking detector during a 4 T commissioning run in October 215. The normalised transverse emittance of the set of accepted muons is reported in this paper.

3 Sample selection The MICE Muon Beamline delivers a high purity beam with less than 1.4 % pion contamination 9. The flight time between the first two time-of-flight hodoscopes (TOF and TOF1) is used to remove other contamination sources such as decay positrons from the final sample. In this measurement, muons with a flight time contained between 27 and 32 ns are accepted. The time-of-flight distribution of the final sample is shown in figure 3. Provided with the position measurements in the five upstream tracker stations, a Kalman filter fits a single helical track to each muon trajectory, accounting for multiple scattering and energy loss in the scintillating material. The result provides the best estimate of the particle position and momentum in the station closest to the absorber 1 (reference plane). The time-of-flight between TOF and TOF1 is represented as a function of the total momentum reconstructed in the tracker in figure 4. The dotted line represents the ideal time-of-flight of a muon that underwent the Bethe-Bloch most probable momentum loss between entering TOF1 and reaching the tracker reference plane. 1 8 MICE Preliminary ISIS Cycle 215/2 Time-of-flight Entries 1976 Mean 28.4 RMS.6147 Time of flight (ns) 34 32 MICE Preliminary ISIS Cycle 215/2 12 1 6 3 8 6 4 28 4 2 26 2 24 26 28 3 32 34 Time of flight (ns) 24 1 12 14 16 18 2 22 24 26 28 3 P at Tracker (MeV/c) Figure 3 Time-of-flight distribution between TOF and TOF1 of the final muon sample. Figure 4 Time-of-flight distribution between TOF and TOF1 as a function of the total momentum measured in the upstream tracker 4 Poincaré sections In this analysis, a Poincaré section is a lower-dimensional subspace of the phase-space. The final sample of muons occupy a certain region of the phase-space of which two dimensional subspaces can be represented for simplicity. Figure 5 shows the (x, y), (x, p x ) and (y, p y ) sections. y (mm) 15 MICE Preliminary ISIS Cycle 215/2 1 5 5 1 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 Px (MeV/c) 1 MICE Preliminary ISIS Cycle 215/2 8 6 4 2 2 4 6 8 25 2 15 1 5 Py (MeV/c) 1 MICE Preliminary ISIS Cycle 215/2 8 6 4 2 2 4 6 8 22 2 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 15 15 1 5 5 1 15 x (mm) 1 15 1 5 5 1 15 x (mm) 1 15 1 5 5 1 15 y (mm) Figure 5 Left to right: (x, y), (x, p x) and (y, p y) Poincaré sections of the phase-space of muons. Due to the large aperture dipoles used to momentum select the muon distribution, the selected muons sample contains dispersion in the horizontal plane. The sample shows a large

momentum spread, σ pz 25.7 MeV/c, for a mean longitudinal momentum, p z = 195.4 MeV/c. The emittance of the whole particle sample does not accurately represent the volume occupied by the particles the phase-space, as muons with different longitudinal momenta occupy different regions of the transverse phase-space. To remove the effect of the dispersion, the particle sample was pieced out in momentum-coherent 8 MeV/c bins. 5 Emittance The transverse normalised emittance was calculated for each 8 MeV/c bin as ɛ N = 1 m µ 4 det Σ, (2) with m µ the muon mass and Σ the 4D covariance matrix defined as σ xx σ xy σ xpx σ xpy Σ = σ xy σ yy σ ypx σ ypy σ xpx σ ypx σ pxpx σ pxpy, (3) σ xpy σ ypy σ pxpy σ pypy whose elements, σ αβ, are the sample covariances between phase-space dimensions. The measured transverse normalised emittance is represented for each momentum bin in figure 6. The horizontal error bars represent the limits of each momentum slice while the vertical error bars are purely statistical errors on the measurements. Systematic error studies are under way but preliminary results indicate that that they are small in comparison. The binned emittances are consistent across the range of studied momenta. The mean measured transverse normalised emittance for the whole sample is 3.85 ±.4 mm. Transverse normalised emittance (mm) 4.2 MICE Preliminary ISIS Cycle 215/2 4.1 4 3.9 3.8 3.7 3.6 19 2 21 22 23 24 25 <Pz> (MeV/c) Figure 6 Transverse normalised emittance of 8 MeV/c longitudinal momentum bins. 6 Recent update and short term prospects The two spectrometer solenoids were powered together with the focus coil for the first time in July 216. The beam was sampled up and downstream of the absorber focus coil module with the two trackers in a symmetrical fashion. Analyses of the data are in progress. Figure 7 shows the reconstructed space point up and downstream in every station of both trackers. The stations are ordered from 5 to 1 before the absorber and from 1 to 5 after so that station 1 is always closest to the absorber.

Figure 7 Space point distributions in both trackers. The stations are ordered from the most upstream to the most downstream, i.e. from 5 to 1 upstream and from 1 to 5 downstream. In the short-term, all the cooling channel superconducting magnets will be powered in different lattice configurations to allow for the measurement of transverse normalised emittance reduction at selected input emittances and momenta. A genetic algorithm was used to optimize the magnetic lattice for increased phase-space volume reduction and transmission for each considered input beam 11. Significant transverse normalised emittance reduction is expected to be measured. A typical case would include a 2 MeV/c mean momentum and a 6 mm input emittance setting. The optimal magnetic lattice involves the magnets configured in flip mode, i.e. with the downstream coils in the opposite polarity to the ones upstream, as this configuration provides a tighter focus at the absorber. Figure 8 shows the simulated evolution of the transverse normalised emittance in the MICE Step IV cooling channel for this particular setting and a 65 mm-thick lithium hydride absorber. The rebound downstream of the absorber is due to filamentation and can be dealt with using a more advanced phase-space volume calculation. The simulated reduction going through the absorber is 4.8 % and 2.7 % when comparing the downstream to the upstream reference plane. The simulation ran on a sample of 1 muons and yielded a transmission of 98.8 %. Figure 8 Evolution of the transverse normalised emittance in the MICE Step IV cooling channel for the 6 mm 2 MeV/c beam in the flip mode lattice configuration. The red band shows the position and thickness of the absorber. Blue lines are places at the locations of the ten tracker stations.

7 Conclusions MICE reached a milestone when the upstream scintillating-fibre tracker was immersed in a nominal uniform 4 T field for the first time during the commissioning of the spectrometer solenoid in October 215. The data sample recorded during this period allowed for the phase-space volume of the muon beam to be measured on a particle-by-particle basis using the MICE tracker. The transverse normalised emittance was calculated for eight 8 MeV/c momentum bins for an average of 3.85 ±.4 mm and showed no significant variation across the momentum range. Acknowledgments The work described here was made possible by grants from Department of Energy and National Science Foundation (U.S.A.), the Instituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (Italy), the Science and Technology Facilities Council (U.K.), the European Community under the European Commission Framework Programme 7 (AIDA project, grant agreement no. 26225, TIARA project, grant agreement no. 26195, and EuCARD), the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and the Swiss National Science Foundation, in the framework of the SCOPES programme. We gratefully acknowledge all sources of support. We are also grateful to the staff of the ISIS Department at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory for the reliable operation of ISIS. We acknowledge the use of Grid computing resources deployed and operated by GridPP in the U.K., http://www.gridpp.ac.uk/. References 1. M. Apollonio et al, Nuc. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 229 232, 515 (212) 2. M. Alsharoa et al, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 6, 811 (23). 3. V. Parkhomchuck and A. Skrinsky, Rev. Accel. Sci. Tech. 1 no. 1, 237 (28). 4. D. Stratakis and R. Palmer, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 18, 313 (215) 5. M. Yoshida et al, Nuc. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 149, 94 98 (25) 6. C. N. Booth et al, JINST 8, P36 (213) 7. D. Adams et al, JINST 1, P1212 (215) 8. M. Ellis et al., NIM A 659, 136 153 (211) 9. D. Adams et al, JINST 11, P31 (216) 1. A. Dobbs et al, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 513, 228 (214) 11. A. Liu et al, JACoW 7, IPAC-216-TUPMY6, 1553 1555 (216)