arxiv:hep-ex/ v1 30 Sep 1997

Similar documents
Discovery potential for SUGRA/SUSY at CMS

Early SUSY Searches in Events with Leptons with the ATLAS-Detector

SUSY Phenomenology & Experimental searches

Search for SUperSYmmetry SUSY

CMS. Saeid Paktinat. On behalf of the CMS Collaborations. (IPM, Tehran)

Physics at the Tevatron. Lecture IV

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 17 Apr 2000

Discovery Physics at the Large Hadron Collider

Outline: Introduction Search for new Physics Model driven Signature based General searches. Search for new Physics at CDF

Search for squarks and gluinos with the ATLAS detector. Jeanette Lorenz (LMU München)

Supersymmetry at the LHC

Supersymmetry at the LHC: Searches, Discovery Windows, and Expected Signatures

P. Sphicas/SSI2001. Standard Model Higgs

Study of supersymmetric tau final states with Atlas at LHC: discovery prospects and endpoint determination

Probing SUSY Dark Matter at the LHC

Searching for the Higgs at the LHC

Neutralino spin measurement with ATLAS detector at LHC

Inclusive searches in ATLAS: How can we discover SUSY in 2009

Search for top squark pair production and decay in four bodies, with two leptons in the final state, at the ATLAS Experiment with LHC Run2 data

ATLAS-CONF October 15, 2010

LHC signals for SUSY discovery and measurements

arxiv:hep-ex/ v1 15 Jun 2006

14th Lomonosov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics Moscow, 24 August 2009

S.Abdullin ITEP. July 8, 2003 S.Abdullin (UMD) LHC SUSY Potential 1

Lecture 18 - Beyond the Standard Model

Beyond the SM: SUSY. Marina Cobal University of Udine

Recent Results on New Phenomena and Higgs Searches at DZERO

Hadronic Search for SUSY with MT2 variable

Measuring Relic Density at the LHC

arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 29 Dec 2017 SUSY (ATLAS) André Sopczak on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration

Probing Supersymmetric Connection with Dark Matter

Probing the Connection Between Supersymmetry and Dark Matter

Searches for electroweak production of supersymmetric gauginos and sleptons with the ATLAS detector

Dark Matter Experiments and Searches

A Simulated Study Of The Potential For The Discovery of the Supersymmetric Sbottom Squark at the ATLAS Experiment

Search for Supersymmetry at LHC

Physics at the TeV Scale Discovery Prospects Using the ATLAS Detector at the LHC

Search for Charginos and Neutralinos with the DØ Detector

The search for missing energy events at the LHC and implications for dark matter search (ATLAS and CMS)

Kaluza-Klein Theories - basic idea. Fig. from B. Greene, 00

SUSY at Accelerators (other than the LHC)

SUSY at Accelerators (other than the LHC)

Search for Supersymmetry at CMS in all-hadronic final states

Higgs Searches at CMS

SUSY searches at LHC and HL-LHC perspectives

LHC Capability for Dark Matter

What the LHC Will Teach Us About Low Energy Supersymmetry

Searches for New Phenomena with Lepton Final States at the Tevatron

Cosmology at the LHC

Searches for Natural SUSY with RPV. Andrey Katz. C. Brust, AK, R. Sundrum, Z. Han, AK, M. Son, B. Tweedie, 1210.XXXX. Harvard University

Taller de Altas Energías Michael Holzbock September 7, LMU Munich

Slepton, Charginos and Neutralinos at the LHC

Physics at Hadron Colliders

Search for R-parity violating Supersymmetry. III Phys. Inst. A, RWTH Aachen

Stau Pair Production At The ILC Tohoku University Senior Presentation Tran Vuong Tung

Early SUSY searches at the LHC

SUSY Search Strategies at Atlas and CMS

Higgs Signals and Implications for MSSM

SUSY Searches at the TEVATRON

Searches for Physics Beyond the Standard Model at the Tevatron

PoS(EPS-HEP 2013)215. WW, WZ, and ZZ production at CMS. Jordi DUARTE CAMPDERROS (on behalf of CMS collaboration)

Search for Pair Production of Stop Quarks Mimicking Top Event Signatures

LHC and Dark Matter 07/23/10. Bhaskar Dutta Texas A&M University

Szuperszimmetria keresése az LHC-nál

Phenomenology of new neutral gauge bosons in an extended MSSM

VBF SM Higgs boson searches with ATLAS

Physics at e + e - Linear Colliders. 4. Supersymmetric particles. M. E. Peskin March, 2002

Testing the Standard Model and Search for New Physics with CMS at LHC

SUSY Searches at CMS in the Fully Hadronic Channel

Searches at LEP. Ivo van Vulpen CERN. On behalf of the LEP collaborations. Moriond Electroweak 2004

Higgs Boson in Lepton Decay Modes at the CMS Experiment

LHC Results in Majid Hashemi IPM, Tehran Wednesday, 11 th May 2011

Introduction to SUSY. Giacomo Polesello. INFN, Sezione di Pavia

Discovery potential of the SM Higgs with ATLAS

Detection of SUSY Signals in Stau-Neutralino

Searching for Supersymmetry at the LHC David Stuart, University of California, Santa Barbara. CMS SUSY Search, D. Stuart, June 2011, Lisbon!

Search for Dark Matter in the mono-x* final states with ATLAS

Overall CMS SUSY search strategy

Interconnection between Particle Physics and Cosmology at the LHC

SUPERSYMMETRY AT THE LHC

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 17 Sep 2018

FIRST SCHOOL ON LHC PHYSICS

Search for Resonant Slepton Production with DØ

Searches for new physics at ATLAS

The HL-LHC physics program

Dark matter searches and prospects at the ATLAS experiment

CMS Searches for SUSY in Final States with Taus. Alfredo Gurrola (Vanderbilt) on behalf of the CMS Collaboration

sin(2θ ) t 1 χ o o o

Chapter 4 Supersymmetry

CMS Searches for New Physics

Non-Standard Higgs Decays

Lecture 4 - Beyond the Standard Model (SUSY)

DM & SUSY Direct Search at ILC. Tomohiko Tanabe (U. Tokyo) December 8, 2015 Tokusui Workshop 2015, KEK

Top Quark Physics at the LHC

Recent searches for new particles using 13 TeV data with ATLAS at the LHC

SUSY searches with ATLAS

Is SUSY still alive? Dmitri Kazakov JINR

Search for Resonant Slepton Production with the DØ-Experiment

Determination of Non-Universal Supergravity Models at the LHC

HIGGS Bosons at the LHC

Transcription:

CMS CR 997/0 SEARCHES FOR SUSY AT LHC arxiv:hep-ex/970903v 30 Sep 997 For the CMS Collaboration Avtandyl Kharchilava Institute of Physics, Georgian Academy of Sciences, Tbilisi ABSTRACT One of the main motivations of experiments at the LHC is to search for SUSY particles. The talk is based on recent analyses, performed by CMS Collaboration, within the framework of the Supergravity motivated minimal SUSY extension of the Standard Model. The emphasis is put on leptonic channels. The strategies for obtaining experimental signatures for strongly and weakly interacting sparticles productions, as well as examples of determination of SUSY masses and model parameters are discussed. The domain of parameter space where SUSY can be discovered is investigated. Results show, that if SUSY is of relevance at Electro-Weak scale it could hardly escape detection at LHC. Presented at XXXII Rencontres de Moriond: QCD and High Energy Hadronic Interactions, Les Arcs, Savoie, France, March -9, 997 E-mail: Avto.Kharchilava@cern.ch

. Introduction The Standard Model (SM), despite its phenomenological successes, is most likely a low energy effective theory of spin-/ matter fermions interacting via spin- gauge bosons. A good candidate for the new physics beyond the SM is the Supersymmetry (SUSY). In the minimal version it doubles the number of known particles, introducing scalar (fermion) partners to ordinary fermions (bosons) with the same couplings. These provide cancellation of divergences in the radiative corrections of the SM, but necessarily, the masses of super-partners should be of the order of Electro-Weak (EW) scale, i.e. < TeV. As a framework we have chosen the minimal Supergravity (msugra), which is the most fully investigated model [], where only five extra parameters need to be specified: the universal scalar(m 0 ), gaugino(m / )massesandtrilinearterm(a 0 )which arefixedatthegaugecoupling unification scale; the ratio of the vacuum expectation values of the two Higgs fields (tanβ) and the sign of the Higgsino mixing parameter (sign(µ)). Sparticle masses and couplings at the EW scale are then evolved via the renormalization group equations. Obtained SUSY mass spectrum is dependent most strongly on m 0 and m /. In the following we limit ourselves to the choice of tanβ =, A 0 = 0 and µ < 0. Fig. shows the isomass contours for gluinos ( g), charginos ( χ ± ), neutralinos ( χ 0 ), sleptons ( l) in (m 0, m / ) parameter space. In R-parity conserving SUSY models sparticles are produced in pairs and a stable Lightest Supersymmetric Particle (LSP;which isthe χ 0 in msugra) appearsattheend ofeachsparticle decay chain. It is weakly interacting and escapes detection thus leading to a classical ET miss signature. Due to the escaping LSP s the masses of sparticles cannot be reconstructed explicitly. Usually, one characterizes the SUSY signal significance (S) by an excess of events (N S ) over the SM background expectation (N B ): S = N S / N S +N B. In some cases, the background to a particular SUSY channel is SUSY itself. The goal of the current analysis is to evaluate the domain of (m 0, m / ) parameter space in which SUSY can be discovered, estimate the reach in gluino, squark, slepton, chargino, neutralino masses in various channels, develop methods to determine SUSY masses and model parameters, understand the instrumental limiting factors and contribute to detector optimization before the design is frozen []. In the following the SM backgrounds are generated with PYTHIA and msugra processes with ISAJET. The CMS detector performances are parameterized on the basis of detailed simulations [3].. Gluino/Squark Production At LHC energies, the total SUSY particles production cross-section are largely dominated by strongly interacting sparticles. Thus a typical high mass SUSY signal has squarks and/or gluinos which decay through a number of steps to quarks, gluons, charginos, neutralinos, W, Z, Higgses and ultimately to a stable χ 0. For instance, the branching ratios of g, q decays into χ± ( χ 0 ) are complementary in (m 0, m / ) parameter space and exceed 30 50%. Furthermore, at values of m 0, m / > 00 GeV the decays χ ± W ± χ 0 are dominant, giving an isolated lepton (µ or e from W) in about 0% of cases. In the region of m 0, m / < 00 GeV the leptonic branching ratios are even higher (here, also B( χ 0 l + l +invisible) may reach 0 0% being an additional important source of isolated leptons). The final state has thus a number of hard jets, missing energy ( χ 0 + neutrinos) and a variable number of leptons, depending on the decay chain. The SM backgrounds considered are: t t, W+jets, Z+jets, WW, ZZ, ZW, Zb b, QCD ( processes, including b b).

The following kinematical variables are the most useful ones for the SM backgrounds suppression: leptonp l T, jetej T, ET miss, scalar transverseenergysumet sum = p l T + ET+E j T miss and Circularity. Depending on the msugra domain under study and the final state topology, the cut values are optimized and are typically: p l T > 0 50 GeV, E j T > 50 50 GeV, ET miss > 00 GeV, ET sum > 00 GeV and C > 0.. Fig. shows the 5σ g/ q discovery contours in various final states with at least two jets, ET miss > 00 GeV and with one lepton (l), two leptons of opposite sign (l OS), two leptons of same sign (l SS), etc. [4]. Clearly, at an integrated luminosity of L int = 0 5 pb the gluino/squark masses up to.5 TeV can be probed. The corresponding reach in the χ 0 mass is 350 GeV. This result is of particular importance as the χ 0 could be a good candidate for cold dark matter of the Universe. The upper limit on neutralino relic density corresponds to Ωh = contour (see Fig.) [5], which is fully contained in the explorable domain. th. excl. Baer, Chen, Munroe, Paige, Tata χ ± () χ 0 (00) g (000) m /, GeV 00 000 g () l q (000) L dt = 00 fb - A 0 = 0, tanβ =, µ < 0 q () m / (GeV) 00 00 R (90) R (00) H (90) H (80) R () χ ± (90) χ 0 (00) tanβ= µ 0; A 0 = 0 v χ ±,χ0 (00) g () χ 0 (50) χ ±,χ 0 (00) exp. excl. 0 00 800 000 m 0 (GeV) Figure : Sparticles isomass contours in (m 0, m / ) parameter space of msugra. D_D_89n 800 00 4l Ωh 0.5 0.5.0 3l 5l l OS q (000) l SS g () g (000) g (000) g () 0 0 00 800 000 00 800 000 m 0, GeV Figure : Explorable domain of (m 0, m / ) parameter space in n l+m jets + ET miss final states at L int = 0 5 pb. q () 3. Slepton Production Slepton pairs produced in a Drell-Yan process and decaying leptonically lead to the final states characterized by two hard, same-flavor, opposite-sign isolated leptons, ET miss and no jet activity, except from the initial state radiation. The issue here is to understand and keep under control the SM and internal SUSY backgrounds in the many processes involved. The following SM processes may contribute to leptons final state: WW, WZ, t t, Wtb, ττ, b b. A typical set of cuts allowing to extract the signal is: isolated leptons of p l T > 30 GeV, Emiss T > 80 GeV, veto on jets with E j T > 30 GeV in η < 4, relative azimuthal angle between the leptons and ET miss > 60 [6]. Depending on msugra domain under study the cuts are optimized. The dominant backgrounds are: reducible t t and irreducible WW, χ ± χ. Other SUSY backgrounds are largely reduced by vetoing the central jets. Fig.3 shows msugra points for which the slepton signal visibility has been investigated in the l+no jets+et miss final states along with a 5σ significance contour for an integrated luminosity of L int = 0 5 pb. The slepton mass domain that can be explored extends up to GeV.

4. Chargino-Neutralino Pair Production There are different reactions (8 χ ± ı χ 0 j, 3 χ± ı χ j and 0 χ 0 ı χ0 j ; ı =, ; j = 4) for chargino-neutralino pair production via Drell-Yan processes, among which χ ± χ 0 production has the largest cross-section. The easiest way to extract the signal is to exploit χ ± χ 0 leptonic decaysresultingtothe3l+nojets+et miss final states. The SM backgrounds considered are: WZ, ZZ, t t, Wtb, Zb b, b b. The SUSY processes, that may lead to 3 leptons in final states are also taken into account: strong production ( g g, g q, q q), associated production ( g χ, q χ), charginoneutralino pair production ( χ χ, other than χ ± χ 0 ) and slepton pair production ( l l, l ν, ν ν). The SUSY background is dominated by strong production, but the jet veto requirement is very efficient in reducing g/ q events which in their cascade decays produce many jets. The typical set of cuts to extract the signal is: 3 isolated leptons with p l T > 5 GeV; veto on jets with E j T > 5 GeV in η < 3.5; a Z mass window cut M Z 0 GeV < M l + l < M Z+0 GeV, which significantly reduces the dominant SM WZ contribution. The signal observability contours at various integrated luminosities are shown in Fig.4 [7]. At low integrated luminosity, L int = 0 4 pb, the direct production of χ ± χ 0 can be extracted uptom / < 50GeVforallm 0. Afurtherincrease ofluminosity uptol int = 0 5 pb extends the explorable region only by about 0 0 GeV for m 0 > 0 GeV because of χ 0 l+ l χ 0 3-body decays are overtaken by spoiler modes χ 0 h χ0, Z χ0, which are now kinematically allowed. However, for m 0 < 0 GeV the gain in parameter space is much larger, up to m / < 40 GeV, due to χ 0 l + l R,L l + l χ 0 -body decays. m / (GeV) LEP Tevatron 00 9.3 σ (0.35) 8. σ (0.8) 8. σ (0.33) 0.3 σ 8.5 σ (0.9) (0.34) 00 7 σ (0.35) 6 σ (.) TH TH 5.4 σ (.3).8 σ (.4) 6.5 σ (0.9).5 σ (.3) EX 6. σ (0.8) 4. σ (0.8) 5.6 σ (.) 5. σ () Ωh = 5.4 σ (.) 0 00 00 m 0 (GeV) 4. σ (0.56) 6.7 σ (.6) 3.3 σ (0.6) 3. σ (0.56) Points investigated, significance nσ (S/B) CMS reach at 0 5 pb - 5. σ (0.9) 4.9 σ (0.8) Figure 3: Explorable domain of (m 0, m / ) parameter space in slepton searches. D_D_745n m / (GeV) 450 350 50 00 50 00 50 TH Ω h : 0.5 0.4 0 3 pb - tanβ =, A 0 = 0, µ < 0 0 4 pb - 00 800 000 00 800 000 m 0 (GeV) EX 0 5 pb - Figure 4: 5σ significance contours at various luminosities for Chargino-Neutralino direct production. D_D_995n 5. Search for the Next-to-Lightest Neutralino The kinematical feature of χ 0 leptonic decays which can be exploited is the l+ l invariant mass spectrum with its characteristic edge, as shown in Fig.5 for a representative msugra point. In cascade decays of gluinos and squarks the production of χ 0 is so abundant, that an edge in the dilepton mass spectrum can be observed in a significant part of (m 0, m / ) plane. Fig.6 shows the cross-section times branching ratio into leptons for χ 0 inclusive production. The SM background can be easily suppressed, e.g. requiring a third lepton or/and ET miss, and with L int = 0 5 pb a detectable edge is seen as long as σ B > 0 pb [8].

There are domains of parameter space when both - and 3-body decays co-exist (or where both modes, χ 0 l+ l R and l + l L are present). For example, in Fig.7 the first edge at M max l + l = 5 GeV corresponds to χ 0 l+ l R decays, while the second edge at M max l + l = 69 GeV to χ 0 l + l χ 0 ones. In 3-bodydecays, the kinematical upper limit ofthe dilepton mass spectrum is Ml max + l = M χ 0 M χ 0 M χ 0, as in msugra M χ 0 M χ 0, thus providing the determination of the χ 0 mass. Whether an edge corresponds to a - or 3-body decays can be deduced from the decay kinematics, e.g. lepton p T -asymmetry A = (p max T p min T )/(p max T + p min T ). This is illustrated in Fig.8, where several dotted histograms are obtained assuming, that the first edge in Fig.7 is due to the 3-body decays with M χ 0 M χ 0 = 5 GeV. m SUGRA parameters m 0 = 00 GeV, m / = 00 GeV, tanβ =, A 0 = 0, µ < 0 00 msugra parameters: tanβ =, A 0 = 0, µ < 0 90 M (χ 0 ) = 97 GeV L int = 0 pb - 80 M (χ 0 ) = 45 GeV p > 5 GeV, IηI <.4 T EVENTS / GeV 70 60 50 40 30 SUSY + SM Isol: no tracks with p > GeV, in R < 0.3 T σ B(χ 0 l + l - + inv.), pb 0 3 0 0 0-0 - 0 0 0 0 40 60 80 00 0 40 60 M + - (GeV) Figure 5: l + l mass spectrum in 3-lepton final states. SM m 0 =00 GeV, m / =50 GeV, tanβ=, A 0 =0, µ<0 0 4 M(χ 0 ) = 35 GeV M(l R ) = 0 GeV M(χ 0 ) = 65 GeV msugra parameters 00 00 700 800 900 000 00 800 000 00 800 000 Figure 6: χ 0 inclusive production cross-section times branching ratio into leptons. 700 3-body decays Observed 0 3 SUSY + SM 00 0 SM 0 0 40 60 80 00 00 0 0 0. 0. 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 Figure 7: l + l mass spectrum in 3-lepton final states. Figure 8: Leptons p T asymmetry distributions in 3- and -body decays of χ 0.

(M χ 0 M l )(M l In -body decays the kinematical upper limit of the dilepton mass spectrum is Ml max + l = M χ i.e. it is sensitive also to the slepton mass, which can be de- 0 )/M l, termined in the following way: i) assume M χ 0 = M χ 0, ii) generate samples of χ 0 -body sequential decays for various M χ 0 (M l); note, that the slepton mass is constrained to provide the observed position of an edge, iii) ambiguity is then resolved statistically, by means of, e.g. a χ -test of the shape of the lepton p T -asymmetry distributions. For the msugra point (m 0 = 00 GeV, m / = 50 GeV) this procedure provides the following precisions on masses: δm χ 0 < 5 GeV, δm l < 0 GeV. The use of both edges yields δm χ 0, l < GeV. Note, that the Z peak seen in Fig.5, 7 serves as an overall calibration signal; it allows to control the mass scale as well as the production cross-section. 6. Conclusions At LHC/CMS SUSY will reveal itself easily by an excess of events over SM expectations in a number of characteristic signatures: The n l+m jets+et miss final states provide the maximal reach for SUSY via production of the strongly interacting sparticles. g and q masses can be probed up to.5 TeV. The explorable χ 0 mass extends up to 350 GeV. Thel+nojets+ET miss final states give access to slepton pair production. The explorable slepton mass range would extend up to GeV. The 3l+no jets+et miss is the final state in which direct χ ± χ 0 production in a Drell-Yan process should be looked for. The l + l + l ± /ET miss final states, with relatively modest demands on detector performance, maywellbethefirstchannelinwhich SUSYwouldrevealitselfthrough χ 0 inclusive production with subsequent decays directly or via sleptons into l + l χ 0. Characteristic dilepton invariant mass spectrum with a spectacular edge could provide a good handle to determine the sparticle masses. What can be measured depends on a scenario Nature has chosen, but if SUSY is of relevance at EW scale it could hardly escape detection at LHC/CMS. Acknowledgments I am thankful to my colleagues from the CMS/SUSY working group led by Dr. Daniel Denegri. Special thanks to the organizers of the Moriond 97 for the support. References [] H. Baer et al., FSU-HEP-95040, CERN-PPE/95-45 and references therein. [] SUSY Studies in CMS, in LHCC SUSY Workshop, CERN, October 9 30, 996; CMS Document 996-49. Copies of transparencies are also available on WEB under http://www.cern.ch/committees/lhcc/susy96.html [3] S. Abdullin, A. Khanov and N. Stepanov, CMSJET, CMS TN/94-80. [4] S. Abdullin, CMS TN/96-095. [5] H. Baer and M. Brhlik, Phys. Rev. D53 (996) 597. [6] D. Denegri, L. Rurua and N. Stepanov, CMS TN/96-59. [7] I. Iashvili, A. Kharchilava and K. Mazumdar, CMS NOTE 997/007. [8] A. Kharchilava in []; I. Iashvili and A. Kharchilava, CMS NOTE 997/065.