arxiv:hep-th/ v1 27 Jan 2003

Similar documents
Physics 607 Exam 1. ( ) = 1, Γ( z +1) = zγ( z) x n e x2 dx = 1. e x2

This chapter illustrates the idea that all properties of the homogeneous electron gas (HEG) can be calculated from electron density.

Workshop: Approximating energies and wave functions Quantum aspects of physical chemistry

Uniqueness of Weak Solutions to the 3D Ginzburg- Landau Model for Superconductivity

Implicit Integration Henyey Method

Causal Diamonds. M. Aghili, L. Bombelli, B. Pilgrim

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Calculus of Variations II

12. The Hamilton-Jacobi Equation Michael Fowler

Homework & Solution. Contributors. Prof. Lee, Hyun Min. Particle Physics Winter School. Park, Ye

CHAPTER 14 GENERAL PERTURBATION THEORY

Tensor Smooth Length for SPH Modelling of High Speed Impact

Numerical Heat and Mass Transfer

SIO 224. m(r) =(ρ(r),k s (r),µ(r))

Lagrangian Field Theory

σ τ τ τ σ τ τ τ σ Review Chapter Four States of Stress Part Three Review Review

Principles of Food and Bioprocess Engineering (FS 231) Solutions to Example Problems on Heat Transfer

Molecular structure: Diatomic molecules in the rigid rotor and harmonic oscillator approximations Notes on Quantum Mechanics

Inductance Calculation for Conductors of Arbitrary Shape

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Week3, Chapter 4. Position and Displacement. Motion in Two Dimensions. Instantaneous Velocity. Average Velocity

8.592J: Solutions for Assignment 7 Spring 2005

PROPERTIES OF FRACTIONAL EXCLUSION STATISTICS IN INTERACTING PARTICLE SYSTEMS

THE EFFECT OF TORSIONAL RIGIDITY BETWEEN ELEMENTS ON FREE VIBRATIONS OF A TELESCOPIC HYDRAULIC CYLINDER SUBJECTED TO EULER S LOAD

Advanced Quantum Mechanics

Unification Paradigm

Topic 5: Non-Linear Regression

NONLINEAR NATURAL FREQUENCIES OF A TAPERED CANTILEVER BEAM

NUMERICAL DIFFERENTIATION

Integrals and Invariants of Euler-Lagrange Equations

Lecture 6/7 (February 10/12, 2014) DIRAC EQUATION. The non-relativistic Schrödinger equation was obtained by noting that the Hamiltonian 2

DETERMINATION OF TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION FOR ANNULAR FINS WITH TEMPERATURE DEPENDENT THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY BY HPM

Perfect Fluid Cosmological Model in the Frame Work Lyra s Manifold

Quantum Mechanics I Problem set No.1

Quantum Field Theory Homework 5

ON A DETERMINATION OF THE INITIAL FUNCTIONS FROM THE OBSERVED VALUES OF THE BOUNDARY FUNCTIONS FOR THE SECOND-ORDER HYPERBOLIC EQUATION

Chapter 12. Ordinary Differential Equation Boundary Value (BV) Problems

Chat eld, C. and A.J.Collins, Introduction to multivariate analysis. Chapman & Hall, 1980

Transfer Functions. Convenient representation of a linear, dynamic model. A transfer function (TF) relates one input and one output: ( ) system

Irregular vibrations in multi-mass discrete-continuous systems torsionally deformed

HW #6, due Oct Toy Dirac Model, Wick s theorem, LSZ reduction formula. Consider the following quantum mechanics Lagrangian,

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. D Alembert s Principle and The Lagrangian-1

ELASTIC WAVE PROPAGATION IN A CONTINUOUS MEDIUM

Lecture 10. Reading: Notes and Brennan Chapter 5

5.76 Lecture #5 2/07/94 Page 1 of 10 pages. Lecture #5: Atoms: 1e and Alkali. centrifugal term ( +1)

Chapter 5. Solution of System of Linear Equations. Module No. 6. Solution of Inconsistent and Ill Conditioned Systems

3.1 Expectation of Functions of Several Random Variables. )' be a k-dimensional discrete or continuous random vector, with joint PMF p (, E X E X1 E X

LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS. MODULE IX Lecture Multicollinearity

Classical Mechanics ( Particles and Biparticles )

Canonical transformations

Physics 181. Particle Systems

Interconnect Modeling

This model contains two bonds per unit cell (one along the x-direction and the other along y). So we can rewrite the Hamiltonian as:

More metrics on cartesian products

Difference Equations

CHAPTER 5 NUMERICAL EVALUATION OF DYNAMIC RESPONSE

Homework 4. 1 Electromagnetic surface waves (55 pts.) Nano Optics, Fall Semester 2015 Photonics Laboratory, ETH Zürich

The Born-Oppenheimer Approximation

Lecture 5.8 Flux Vector Splitting

Quantum Particle Motion in Physical Space

Electron-Impact Double Ionization of the H 2

The exponential map of GL(N)

Uncertainty in measurements of power and energy on power networks

The equation of motion of a dynamical system is given by a set of differential equations. That is (1)

DECOUPLING THEORY HW2

Spin-rotation coupling of the angularly accelerated rigid body

Professor Terje Haukaas University of British Columbia, Vancouver The Q4 Element

Supplemental document

Lectures - Week 4 Matrix norms, Conditioning, Vector Spaces, Linear Independence, Spanning sets and Basis, Null space and Range of a Matrix

Module 3 LOSSY IMAGE COMPRESSION SYSTEMS. Version 2 ECE IIT, Kharagpur

WAVE PROPAGATION, REFLECTION AND TRANSMISSION IN CURVED BEAMS

DUE: WEDS FEB 21ST 2018

STATIC ANALYSIS OF TWO-LAYERED PIEZOELECTRIC BEAMS WITH IMPERFECT SHEAR CONNECTION

A particle in a state of uniform motion remain in that state of motion unless acted upon by external force.

CHAPTER 10 ROTATIONAL MOTION

In this section is given an overview of the common elasticity models.

Rotational Dynamics. Physics 1425 Lecture 19. Michael Fowler, UVa

THEOREMS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

Chapter Newton s Method

CONDUCTORS AND INSULATORS

Linear Approximation with Regularization and Moving Least Squares

1 Rabi oscillations. Physical Chemistry V Solution II 8 March 2013

Prof. Dr. I. Nasser Phys 630, T Aug-15 One_dimensional_Ising_Model

Lagrange Multipliers. A Somewhat Silly Example. Monday, 25 September 2013

Quantum states of deuterons in palladium

Snce h( q^; q) = hq ~ and h( p^ ; p) = hp, one can wrte ~ h hq hp = hq ~hp ~ (7) the uncertanty relaton for an arbtrary state. The states that mnmze t

arxiv: v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 16 Sep 2013

APPENDIX A Some Linear Algebra

Lecture Notes 7: The Unruh Effect

Projective change between two Special (α, β)- Finsler Metrics

Solution of Equilibrium Equation in Dynamic Analysis. Mode Superposition. Dominik Hauswirth Method of Finite Elements II Page 1

One-sided finite-difference approximations suitable for use with Richardson extrapolation

and Statistical Mechanics Material Properties

A how to guide to second quantization method.

Tensor Analysis. For orthogonal curvilinear coordinates, ˆ ˆ (98) Expanding the derivative, we have, ˆ. h q. . h q h q

Classical Field Theory

Uncertainty and auto-correlation in. Measurement

Lecture Note 3. Eshelby s Inclusion II

A Hybrid Variational Iteration Method for Blasius Equation

Lagrangian Theory. Several-body Systems

LAGRANGIAN MECHANICS

Transcription:

KOBE-TH-- Stablty of Neutral Ferm Balls wth Mult-Flavor Fermons T.Yoshda Department of Physcs, Tokyo Unversty, Hongo 7--, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo -, Japan K.Ogure arxv:hep-th/6v 7 Jan Department of Physcs, Kobe Unversty, Rokkoudacho -, Nada-Ku, Kobe 657-85, Japan J.Arafune Natonal Insttuton for Academc Degrees, Htotsubash --, Chyoda-Ku, Tokyo -848, Japan (Dated: November 6, 8) Abstract A Ferm ball s a knd of non-topologcal solton, whch s thought to arse from the spontaneous breakng of an approxmate Z symmetry and to contrbute to cold dark matter. We consder a smple model n whch fermon felds wth mult-flavors are coupled to a scalar feld through Yukawa couplng, and examne how the number of the fermon flavors affects the stablty of the Ferm ball aganst the fragmentaton. ()We fnd that the Ferm ball s stable aganst the fragmentaton n most cases even n the lowest order thn-wall approxmaton. ()We then fnd that n the other specfc cases, the stablty s margnal n the lowest order thn-wall approxmaton, and the nextto-leadng order correcton determnes the stable regon of the couplng constants; We examne the smplest case where the total fermon number N and the Yukawa couplng constant G of each flavor are common to the flavor, and fnd that the Ferm ball s stable n the lmted regon of the parameters and has the broader regon for the larger number of the flavors. PACS numbers: 5.45.Yv, 95.5.+d

I. INTRODUCTION A Ferm ball [, ], a knd of non-topologcal solton [], s composed of three parts: a false vacuum doman, a doman wall envelopng the doman, and zero-mode fermons [4] confned n the doman wall. The Ferm ball s stablzed owng to the dynamcal balance of the shrnkng force due to the surface energy and the volume energy, and the expandng force due to the Ferm energy. The Ferm ball s thought to be a canddate for one knd of cold dark matter n the present unverse [5]. Macpherson and Campbell ponted out that such stablty holds good only for the sphercal shape of the Ferm ball []. They further showed that the Ferm ball s not stable aganst the deformaton of the sphercal shape, and thus flattens and fragments nto tny Ferm balls. The destablzaton s caused by the volume energy of the Ferm ball. We, however, ponted out that the perturbatve correcton due to the doman wall curvature can stablze the Ferm ball when the volume energy s small enough compared to the curvature effect [6, 7]. In case of a smple model wth a sngle fermon flavor, we found that only n the qute narrow regon of the parameters does the Ferm ball become stable. The purpose of the present paper s to examne how the fermon content of the model affects the stablty of the Ferm ball. As an example, we consder an extended model n whch fermons wth mult-flavors are coupled to a scalar feld through Yukawa couplng. Snce the Paul s excluson prncple does not apply to the dfferent flavors of the fermons, the stable regon of the parameters s expected to broaden. II. STABILITY OF FERMI BALL We consder the followng Lagrangan densty, L = n ( µφ) + Ψ (γ µ µ G φ)ψ U(φ), () = where the scalar potental U(φ) s gven by U(φ) = λ 8 (φ v ) + (φ). () If the quantty (v) ( v) s zero, the Lagrangan densty s nvarant under the Z transformaton, φ φ. There s, however, a small but a fnte quantty (v) ( v) Λ λv 4, where the nvarance s not a strct one.

We consder a sphercal Ferm ball wth the radus R, and assume that the wave functon Ψ and the boson φ are statc and that φ depends only on the radal coordnate r. Let Ψ be the egenfuncton of the total angular momentum squared J, the z component J z and the party P wth the egenvalues of J(J +), M and ( ) J ω/ (ω = ±), respectvely. Then, Ψ s wrtten as Ψ ( x) = r f(r)ym lj (θ,ϕ) g(r)yl M J (θ,ϕ), () where Y M lj and Y M l J = ( σ x/r)y M lj are the sphercal spnors havng the egenvalues J and M, wth J = l + ω/ = l ω/. Substtutng Eq.() nto the Lagrangan L = d x L, we obtan L[φ,ψ ] = dr 4πr ( ) dφ +U(φ) dr + ψ H f ψ, (4) where d H f = σ dr +σ K r +σ G φ, (5) wth K = ω(j + ) and ψ (r) = ( ) f(r) g(r). Snce the Ferm ball s a ground state wth a fxed number of fermons, N = d x Ψ Ψ, (6) we obtan the wave functon ψ and the scalar feld φ by extremzng L ǫ [φ,ψ ] = L[φ,ψ ]+ ( ǫ dr ψ ψ N ), (7) wth the Lagrange multplers ǫ. The energy of the Ferm ball s expressed n terms of the felds as E = dr 4πr ( dφ dr ) +U(φ) + ǫ (8) whereǫ sequaltothefermenergyǫ = dr ψ H f ψ andψ snormalzedas dr ψ ψ =. In order to estmate the energy of the Ferm ball, we take the thn-wall approxmaton and obtan the correcton due to the fnte curvature radus R by the perturbaton wth respect to /R. We expand φ, ψ, and H f n the power of /R, φ = φ +φ + ψ = ψ +ψ + H f = H +H +H +, (9)

where d dr +σ Kw H = σ R +σ G φ H = σ H = σ Kw K R +σ G φ R, () wth w = r R. From δl ǫ /δφ = δl ǫ /δψ =, we obtan the equatons of moton, and H ψ = ǫ ψ () d φ dw = U + G ψ φ φ=φ 4πR σ ψ, () (H ǫ )ψ = (H ǫ )ψ () d dw U φ φ = Rdφ dw + G ψ πr σ ψ. (4) φ=φ Neglectng (φ) n the scalar potental U(φ) for smplcty, we have analytc solutons for φ and ψ, φ (w) = vtanh w (5) ψ (w) = N cosh γ w χ +, (6) where = λ v s the thckness of the doman wall, γ = λ G s the constant[8], N = dw cosh γ w/ s the normalzaton factor, and χ ± s the egenspnor of σ wth the egenvalue ±. We note that the second term of the r.h.s. of Eq.() vanshes. The leadng order of the egenvalue s gven by ǫ = K R, (7) where we take K postve (ω = +). We have solutons for φ and ψ, φ (w) = w dw cosh 4w w cosh w ψ (w) = { } c + (w)χ + +c (w)χ N dw h(w ) cosh w (8), (9) 4

where and v h(w) = Rcosh + w πr 4 KG N w dw w cosh γ w, () c + (w) = { K w cosh γ w dw cosh γ w R } w G dw φ (w ) c (w) = K R coshγ w w w dw w cosh γ w dw w cosh γ w. () Substtutng the solutons nto Eq.(8), we obtan the energy of the Ferm ball, where E s the leadng order contrbuton to the energy, E = E +δe, () E = 8πλ v R + N R and δe s the energy correcton of the order of E ( /R),, () δe = N R +πλv4 dw πλ v R dw cosh 4 w w cosh 4 w w dw cosh 4w w dw h(w ) cosh w + R 4 5R 5 + R N N N 5 N G N dw dw N w w cosh γ w dw w cosh γ w w w dw w cosh γ w w cosh γ w dw cosh 4 w In the above equatons, we use the relatons, dw cosh γ w w w dw cosh w dw h(w ) cosh w. (4) N = = K max J K= M= J = K max (K) = K max (K max +), (5) K= 5

ǫ = K = R R K max(k max +)(K max + ) N R + N (N ). (6) R ()Stablty n the leadng order approxmaton Let us examne the stablty of the Ferm ball wthn the leadng order approxmaton n the /R-expanson. From E / R =, we get the mnmzng radus, and the energy at the radus, R mn = ( N π λ 6v ), (7) we note E / R > at R = R mn. ( E = π λ 6 N ) v. (8) In order to examne the stablty aganst the fragmentaton, we compare two states; a state A n whch a sngle Ferm ball has the fermon number N for -th flavor, and a state B n whch m Ferm balls have the fermon number N (a) each and conserve the total fermon number as m a= N (a) = N for each flavor. States A and B have the energy E A = E (N ) and E B = ae (N (a) ), respectvely. To compare the energy of the two states, we use Mnkowsk s nequalty, ( (N () +N () ) ) ( (N () ) ) ( ) + (N () ), (9) where the equalty s vald only for N () = cn () (c ) wth c beng common for all. Usng the relaton repeatedly, we have ( (N ) ) a ( (N (a) ) ), () where the r.h.s. s equal to the l.h.s. only for N (a) = c (a) N (c (a) and m a= c (a) = ). Ths leads us to the fact that except for the specal case of N (a) = c (a) N, state A has lower energy than that of state B, and thus the Ferm ball s stable aganst the fragmentaton n the leadng order approxmaton. Ths stuaton that the Ferm ball s stable n most cases s characterstc of the case wth mult-flavor of fermons, and qualtatvely dfferent from the case of a sngle flavor [7]. In case of N (a) 6 = c (a) N, the two states have the same energy

n the leadng order approxmaton, and the correcton term δe determnes the stablty of the Ferm ball aganst the fragmentaton. ()Stablty n the next-to-leadng order approxmaton n the specal case N (a) = c (a) N We examne the stablty of the Ferm ball aganst the fragmentaton n the case of N (a) = c (a) N. Substtutng R = R mn nto Eq.(4) yelds δe = C(λ,G,N )v, () where Here, I to I 5 are gven by C(λ,G,N ) = π λ 6( N ) I = I = I () = I 4 () = I 5 () = 6( N ) 48π 5 ( N 5 N I 4 ()) 5λ 7 6( N ) 5 x dx cosh 4 x dx cosh 4 x x x dx cosh γ x x dx cosh γ x x dx cosh γ x + 8π(I I ) λ dx cosh 4 x x x x + 64π( N N I ()) λ ( N ) + 8π( G N N I 5 ()) λ( N ) dx h(x ) cosh x dx cosh γ x dx x x cosh γ x dx x cosh dx cosh 4 x x x. () dx h(x ) cosh x, () wth h(w) rescaled as h(x) = R v h(x) and N as N = N. We compare state A of the sngle Ferm ball and state B of m Ferm balls wth the total fermon number to be conserved for each flavor. States A and B have the energy E A = E (N ) + C(λ,G,N )v and E B = ae (N (a) )+ ac(λ,g,n (a) )v, respectvely. In case of N (a) = c (a) N, we derve ae (N (a) ) = E (N )fromeq.(8) andc(λ,g,n (a) ) = C(λ,G,N )fromeq.(), andthus fnd that state B has the energy E B = E (N ) + mc(λ,g,n )v. Therefore, f C(λ,G,N ) s postve, state A has lower energy than that of the state B by the magntude of the correcton term δe, and the Ferm ball s stable aganst fragmentaton even n the specal case of N (a) = c (a) N. 7

Let us consder the smplfed model to examne how the number of the fermon flavors n affects the stablty of the Ferm ball n case of N (a) = c (a) N. We assume that Ψ belongs to a multplet of the nternal symmetry wth a common Yukawa couplng constant G and also assume that the fermon number s common to the flavor,.e., N = N. Under these assumptons, the coeffcent C s ndependent of N and dependent on λ, G and n from Eq.(). We evaluate Eq.() usng a numercal ntegraton, and obtan the stable regon of theparameterswherec spostve(seefguresand). Thesefguresshowthattheallowed n = G n = n =... λ FIG. : The allowed regons (shadowed) of the scalar self-couplng constant λ and the Yukawa couplng constant G for the Ferm ball to be stable aganst the fragmentaton. We assume that the fermon Ψ ( n) belongs to a multplet and the boson φ to a snglet of the nternal symmetry, and that the fermon number N s common to the flavor as N = N. The fgure shows that the allowed regon broadens as n ncreases. regons of the parameters exst for the Ferm ball to be stable aganst the fragmentaton (the shadowed regons n the fgures). We see n the fgures that the allowed regon broadens as the number of the flavors n ncreases. 8

λ =. n λ =. G FIG. : The allowed regon (shadowed) of the scalar self-couplng constant λ (left) and the Yukawa couplng constant G (rght) for the Ferm ball to be stable. The assumptons are the same as those n Fgure. We see that the allowed regons broaden as n ncreases. III. CONCLUSION We have consdered a model for the Ferm ball n whch the fermons wth mult-flavors Ψ ( n) are coupled to the scalar feld φ and the total fermon number of each -th flavor s fxed as N. We have examned the regon of the parameters for the Ferm ball to be stable aganst fragmentaton, and how the number of the fermon flavors n affects the stablty. We have consdered the thn-wall Ferm ball,.e., the radus R s much larger than the wall thckness. Wehavetakennto account theeffect duetothefntewall thckness bythe perturbaton expanson wth respect to /R. In the leadng order thn-wall approxmaton, we have compared the energy of the ntal state of a sngle Ferm ball and that of the fnal state of fragmented m Ferm balls, wth the total fermon number N of each flavor 9

beng conserved, m a= N (a) = N. We have found that the former s smaller than the latter and thus the Ferm ball s stable aganst fragmentaton, except for the specal case of N (a) = c (a) N wth m a= c (a) =. Ths stuaton that the Ferm ball s stable n most cases s characterstc of the case wth mult-flavor of fermons, and qualtatvely dfferent from the case of a sngle flavor. In the specal case of N (a) = c (a) N, the two states have the same energy n the leadng order approxmaton and the next-to-leadng order correcton term δe determnes the stablty. There we have found that the energy of the ntal state s E +Cv and that of the fragmented states s E +mcv, where v s a symmetry breakng scale and C s a coeffcent dependent on the scalar self-couplng constant λ, the Yukawa couplng constant G and the fermon number N. Ths tells us that even n that case the Ferm ball s stable when C takes a postve value n the parameter regon of λ, G and N. We have consdered the smplfed model n whch a multplet of fermons has a common G and a common N for each flavor. We have found that the allowed regon of the parameters for the Ferm ball to be stable exsts and broadens as the multplet dmenson n ncreases. [] A. L. Macpherson and B. A. Campbell, Phys. Lett. B47 (995) 5. [] J. R. Morrs, Phys. Rev. D59 (999) 5. [] T. D. Lee and Y. Pang, Phys. Rep. (99) 5. [4] For the examples of zero-mode fermons bound n the doman wall, see: G. Dval and M. Shfman, Nucl. Phys. B54 (997) 7 ; M. Sakamoto and M. Tachbana, Phys. Lett. B458 (999). [5] J. Arafune, T. Yoshda, S. Nakamura and K. Ogure, Phys. Rev. D6 () 5. [6] T. Yoshda, K. Ogure and J. Arafune, hep-ph/6, to appear n Phys. Rev. D. [7] K. Ogure, T. Yoshda and J. Arafune, hep-ph/. [8] The constant γ s equal to the squared rato of the thckness of the doman wall to that of the dstrbuton of the fermon confned n the wall, γ = ( /δ f ), where δ f s gven by δ f = λ 4G v.