Experimental Ecology and Geobotany Study of the water-beetles communities of the Po plain

Similar documents
Experimental Ecology and Geobotany A rapid methodology for the survey of Floristic Cartography quadrants in the Po Plain (North-Italy)

Problemi e strategie di conservazione della Biodiversità: Parchi, Natura 2000 e Rete Ecologica Nazionale

Advanced Placement Biology Union City High School Summer Assignment 2011 Ecology Short Answer Questions

AP Environmental Science I. Unit 1-2: Biodiversity & Evolution

Most natural ecosystems are in a state of equilibrium. This means that their biotic and abiotic features remain relatively constant over time.

Climate Change. Unit 3

Ecological Succession

PP-ICON - Plant-Pollinator Integrated CONservation approach: a demonstrative proposal LIFE09 NAT/IT/000212

Reference status and WFD assessment of river macrophytes in Flanders (Belgium)

Integrative Biology 200 "PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGENETICS" Spring 2018 University of California, Berkeley

UNIT 5. ECOSYSTEMS. Biocenosis Biotope Biotic factors Abiotic factors

International Conference Analysis and Management of Changing Risks for Natural Hazards November 2014 l Padua, Italy

Georgia Performance Standards for Urban Watch Restoration Field Trips

Spheres of Life. Ecology. Chapter 52. Impact of Ecology as a Science. Ecology. Biotic Factors Competitors Predators / Parasites Food sources

Warm Up Name the 5 different types of fossils

History of life on Earth Mass Extinctions.

SGCEP SCIE 1121 Environmental Science Spring 2012 Section Steve Thompson:

ENVE203 Environmental Engineering Ecology (Nov 05, 2012)

Survey of Invertebrate Species in Vernal Ponds at UNDERC. Joseph Lucero. 447 Knott Hall. University of Notre Dame

Foretelling a major meltdown

TAYLOR POLYNOMIALS DARYL DEFORD

Walking across a snowy field or mountain, you might not notice many living things. But if you dig into the snow, you ll find a lot of life!

Insect Success. Insects are one of the most successful groups of living organisms on earth

Biogeography. An ecological and evolutionary approach SEVENTH EDITION. C. Barry Cox MA, PhD, DSc and Peter D. Moore PhD

Population Ecology and the Distribution of Organisms. Essential Knowledge Objectives 2.D.1 (a-c), 4.A.5 (c), 4.A.6 (e)

Question #1: What are some ways that you think the climate may have changed in the area where you live over the past million years?

Butterfly Monitoring at North Dam Meadows, Hanningfield.

Ecological Succession

Resolution XIII.23. Wetlands in the Arctic and sub-arctic

Ecosystems. 1. Population Interactions 2. Energy Flow 3. Material Cycle

Community Ecology Bio 147/247. Human Impacts 1: The Ecology of Biological Invasions

Activity 2 Changes Close to Home

UNIT 5: ECOLOGY Chapter 15: The Biosphere

Drying inland seas probably helped kill Australia s megafauna

Our Lady Immaculate Catholic Primary School History and Geography Curriculum Map Would the Bog Baby survive in Liverpool?

Ch 5. Evolution, Biodiversity, and Population Ecology. Part 1: Foundations of Environmental Science

Studies on adaptation capacity of Carpathian ecosystems/landscape to climate change

Global warming and the change of butterfly distributions: a new opportunity for species diversity or a severe threat (Lepidoptera)?

Vanishing Species 5.1. Before You Read. Read to Learn. Biological Diversity. Section. What do biodiversity studies tell us?

COMPUTER METHODS AND MODELING IN GEOLOGY THE GLOBAL PHOSPHORUS CYCLE

CHAPTER 6 & 7 VOCABULARY

Topic 5: Mechanisms of influence: Species range shi s. Climate Change Ecology Geography 404 Jeff Hicke

EXTINCTION CALCULATING RATES OF ORIGINATION AND EXTINCTION. α = origination rate Ω = extinction rate

Chapter 52 An Introduction to Ecology and the Biosphere

World Geography Chapter 3

Multivariate Statistics 101. Ordination (PCA, NMDS, CA) Cluster Analysis (UPGMA, Ward s) Canonical Correspondence Analysis

Stream Study LIFE SCIENCE STANDARDS. LEVELS K-4 LEVELS 5-8 LEVELS 9-12 Characteristics of organisms

Interregional Cooperation in the Apennines

Fish Passage and Abundance around Grade Control Structures on Incised Streams in Western Iowa

Biocultural Diversity. An introduction

Ecosystems and Communities

Geospatial technology for land cover analysis

Don t like the weather? Wait ten minutes. has been a phrase used by many in the Great

Community Stability. Ecological Succession

WHAT IS BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY?

Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines

Chapter Introduction. Earth. Change. Chapter Wrap-Up

Phanerozoic Diversity and Mass Extinctions

IMPACTS OF A WARMING ARCTIC

Lab 2 The reinvasion of flowering plants into aquatic habitats

Overview. How many species are there? Major patterns of diversity Causes of these patterns Conserving biodiversity

Lecture 8. The Holocene and Recent Climate Change

Climatic and Ecological Conditions in the Klamath Basin of Southern Oregon and Northern California: Projections for the Future

The Arctic A Barometer for Global Climate Change. 4 June 2008 at 1:15 3:00 PM Trusteeship Council

BIODIVERSITY IN LEAF LITTER

Physics 6A Lab Experiment 6

Prentice Hall Science Explorer 2005, The Nature of Science and Technology (Book P) Correlated to: Indiana Academic Standards for Science (Grade 6)

ESS 431 Principles of Glaciology ESS 505 The Cryosphere

THE RED BOOK OF PLANTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA

Physics 10 Spring Final Exam: You are a Turtle. Name:

ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS OF INVASIVE SPECIES. on Native Species and Ecosystems

Northern New England Climate: Past, Present, and Future. Basic Concepts

Section 8. North American Biomes. What Do You See? Think About It. Investigate. Learning Outcomes

1. Origins of Geography

Chapter 6, Part Colonizers arriving in North America found extremely landscapes. It looked different to region showing great.

Observed changes in climate and their effects

The Living World Continued: Populations and Communities

Non-independence in Statistical Tests for Discrete Cross-species Data

Bright blue marble floating in space. Biomes & Ecology

Thursday, April 27, 17

What determines: 1) Species distributions? 2) Species diversity? Patterns and processes

Witchampton CofE First School Geography Curriculum Map

ESCI 1 Lab #2: Plant Communities and extinction

Groups of organisms living close enough together for interactions to occur.

In 1831 people thought:

Landscape evolution. An Anthropic landscape is the landscape modified by humans for their activities and life

The study of insect species diversity and modern approaches

SPRING GROVE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNED INSTRUCTION. Course Title: Wildlife Studies Length of Course: 30 Cycles

DO STRATWARMS AFFECT 160M PROPAGATION? A Look at the North America to Europe Path

Comparison of flowering plant diversity and insect diversity at varying elevations across Dominica, West Indies. By Brent Goebel

Chapter 6 Population and Community Ecology

EQ: Discuss main geographic landforms of the U.S. & Canada and examine varied landforms in relation to their lifestyles.

Ecology 312 SI STEVEN F. Last Session: Aquatic Biomes, Review This Session: Plate Tectonics, Lecture Quiz 2

Zoological Systematics & Taxonomy

Earth History. What is the Earth s time scale? Geological time Scale. Pre-Cambrian. FOUR Eras

Physics 6A Lab Experiment 6

Infaunal communities in Baltic infralittoral muddy sediment not dominated by bivalves

THE DEGENERATION OF CARDON POPULATIONS IN BAJA CALIFORNIA SUR, MEXICO

Weathering and Erosion

Natural Vegetation and Wildlife

Transcription:

Scientifica Acta 2, No. 2, 75 79 (2008) Experimental Ecology and Geobotany Study of the water-beetles communities of the Po plain Paolo Mazzoldi Dipartimento di Ecologia del Territorio, Università di Pavia, Via S. Epifanio 14, 27100 Pavia, Italy paolo.mazzoldi@fastwebnet.it The situation of the water-beetles communities of the Po plain was investigated and compared with the situation in the past. The results show a marked fall in biodiversity, due in some cases to the arrival of the introduced species Procambarus clarkii (Girard, 1852) but in other cases to other factors, which are probably global warming and water pollution. 1 Introduction The original objective of this research was to study the water beetles communities in order to identify the characters of their composition relative to ecological variables, in view of a possible use of these communities as indicators of the conditions of lentic habitats: that is I hoped to develop a method for the assessment of the quality of marshy areas comparable to the methods existing for lotic habitats, such as for instance the EBI (Extended Biotic Index). To that end I had identified a number of lentic habitats of the Po plain, some of which I had already sampled in the 1980 s and were chosen because they were characterized by very rich water beetles communities, and some not yet sampled. Unluckily, the research could not be carried out according to this plan, because the first samplings revealed a disastrous situation of the water beetles communities, even in the biotopes which had been chosen for their supposed richness of water beetle fauna: in fact, many of the communities which I planned to study had practically disappeared. Therefore, I was forced to modify my original project and as a consequence the present work is composed of two parts: in the first part, I have tried to achieve my original objective, that is to identify the characteristics of a water beetle community in an environment still in good ecological conditions, using only the data found in the literature or the results of samplings carried out in the past, before the present collapse of the communities. The result, I fear, will only have an historical value, since in the present condition of the lentic habitats of the Po plain it is very difficult to imagine that the knowledge so acquired will ever be used to evaluate the conditions of environments which by now are profoundly and probably irreversibly altered relative to their original condition. In the second part of the work I have tried instead to describe the process by which this collapse took place and to identify the possible causes. For this purpose I considered mainly the environments of the Po plain (and some not strictly in the plain, but very close to it and with similar ecological conditions) in which samplings had been carried out in the past, before the collapse of the communities, and whose data were available in the literature or known to me although not yet published, so that I could compare those data with the results of the samplings which I carried out during this research (which spans the years 2006-2008). 2 Materials and methods As already mentioned in the introduction, the paper is based on the study of a number of biotopes of the Po plain, which had already been studied in the past. I chose all the biotopes which I could find, that is: Torbiere di Iseo-Provaglio (Ravizza 1972), Torbiera di Marcaria and Lanca di Le Bine (Mazzoldi 1987), Garzaia di Valenza Po (Della Beffa et al., 1982), Lago di Sartirana Briantea (Brivio 1970). Some of these (Torbiere di Iseo-Provaglio and Lago di Sartirana Briantea) are not strictly in the Po plain because they are really situated in the morainic belt souh of the North-italian lakes, but they are very close to the plain, at

76 Scientifica Acta 2, No. 2 (2008) the same altitude and enjoy similar climatic and ecological conditions, so their faunas are comparable to those of the plain. I also sampled personally a number of the above mentioned biotopes and some others, not yet sampled or sampled but not yet published (Lanca di Abbadia Lariana, Pian di Spagna). The sampling was carried out with a standard net for water beetles, sampling along 2 m of shore for about 1 hour. It was originally planned to consider all the water beetles, but in consideration of the fact that I have to base most of the study on past data, I have decided to limit the study to the group Hydradephaga (comprising, in the study area, the three families Haliplidae, Gyrinidae & Dytiscidae) because only for this group there are enough data for comparisons in the literature. 3 The original water beetle faunas of the Po plain The first step in the study has been an evaluation and comparison of the original water beetles communities based on the data found in the literature of the years 1970 s and 1980 s. For this purpose I have used the data of the above mentioned biotopes and the data derived from the sampling of the marshy area of Pian di Spagna (Sondrio, Lombardy); this environment is not in the Po plain, since it is at the northern tip of lake Como, but is placed at about the same altitude than the plain and it had been sampled by me in 1991, so a comparison with the present situation was possible. It was of course necessary to choose the parameters to be evaluated, and it seemed logical to choose a measure of biodiversity, since it is intuitive that environments in good ecological conditions should have richer and more complex communities than degraded environments. To evaluate biodiversity many methods and indexes are available, but, since I had to evaluate environments which I could not sample myself on the basis of samples collected by different authors with different methods, it was necessary to choose indexes and methods which were sensible as little as possible to the disparity of sampling methods. A first very simple index is the number of species of a community. The problem with this index is that one should reach a reasonable degree of certainty that all the species of the community have been included in the sample, which is not easy to achieve, especially with certain taxa. A number of methods have been therefore devised in order to estimate if this result has been achieved (Magurran, 2004). Luckily, as far as water beetles are concerned, this problem is less serious than in other groups, for the following reasons: a) water beetles are generally confined to a limited space, not only because they are obviously restricted to aquatic environments, but also because within such environments water beetles are generally only found in a very narrow (often not wider than 1 m) belt of low water with aquatic vegetation along the shore. Therefore sampling inside this limited space it is not too difficult to collect all the species, although the very rare ones may escape (but usually replication of sampling solves the problem); b) the adult stage of water beetles is pretty long compared to other groups of insects, and usually 2-3 samples adequately spaced in the period spring-summer are enough to catch all or almost all the species. The following table gives the number of species of Hydradephaga in the biotopes considered (the years refer to the date of sampling): Number of Species Year/s of sampling Le Bine 31 1984-1985 Marcaria 31 1985-1986 Valenza Po 33 before 1982 (not indicated) Sartirana 26 1953-1960 Iseo 26 1971-1972 Pian di Spagna 27 1991 The table immediately shows two facts: a) all the biotopes were very rich in species (values between 26 and 33 place them amid the richest Italian biotopes); b) the three biotopes situated in the middle of

Scientifica Acta 2, No. 2 (2008) 77 Fig. 1: The dendrogram based on presence/absence of species (P= Pian di Spagna; M=Marcaria; B=Le Bine; V=Valenza Po; S=Sartirana; I=Iseo). Fig. 2: the fall in number of species and number of specimens from 1985 to 2008. the plain (Le Bine, Marcaria and Valenza Po) are slightly richer than those situated in the morainic belt (Sartirana, Iseo) or in the mountain belt (Pian di Spagna). Afterwards, a comparison between the composition of the 6 environments was carried out using cluster analysis. A matrix of presence/absence data for all the species and biotopes was compiled, and from it a dissimilarity matrix was computed using the Euclidean distance between the biotopes; this was used for the analysis. Fig. 1 shows the resulting dendrogram. It is interesting to note that the dendrogram puts the three environments of the plain (Valenza Po, Marcaria, Le Bine) into one group and the three ones of the morainic and mountain belt (Iseo, Sartirana, Pian di Spagna) into another. 4 The collapse of the populations of water beetles What is written above describes the situation as it used to be, but as I already mentioned, the present situation is very different. The situation in Marcaria clearly exemplifies this. The diagram in Fig.2 shows the fall in number of species and number of specimens from 1985 to 2008. Since the first thing that I noticed when I began sampling at Marcaria in 2006 was the presence (in great quantity, 30-40 specimens per sampling) of the introduced crayfish Procambarus clarkii, and the disastrous effects that this species exercises on the indigenous communities are well known (Pederzani & Fabbri 2006, Geiger et al. 2005, Rodríguez et al. 2005), it was natural to attribute the collapse of the communities to its action. But a more careful consideration of all the data available showed that Procambarus, while surely important, is not the only factor involved. First of all, the data available indicate that at Marcaria the population of water beetles were declining before the arrival of the crayfish: at the turn of the century (when the crayfish had not yet arrived) the species were almost all still present, but the numbers of specimens had already strongly fallen (M. Toledo,

78 Scientifica Acta 2, No. 2 (2008) Fig. 3: The evolution of the number of species and specimens in Torbiere di Iseo (left) and Pian di Spagna (right). personal communication). Second, comparison of the old data relative to Torbiere di Iseo and Pian di Spagna and the data collected during the present study, shows that in those two biotopes (which are still free from Procambarus), the populations of water beetles are also declining. Fig. 2 shows the trend of specimens and species collected in 1972 and 2007-2008 for Iseo and the analogous trend for the years 1991 and 2007-2008 for Pian di Spagna. The decline in both number of specimens and species is evident, especially for Iseo. Pian di Spagna appears to be still in relatively good condition, but it seems that the number of species present is being gradually eroded. It is difficult to identify the cause of this decline, which is probably due to various factors acting simultaneously. Global warming might be involved in the disappearance of some species, for instance the disappearance of the two Gyrinid species (Gyrinus suffriani Scriba, 1855 and Gyrinus paykulli Ochs, 1927)from Torbiere di Iseo. In fact, they seem to have disappeared between 1980 and 2000, just when the warming was accelerating; since these two species, and in particular Gyrinus paykulli Ochs, 1927, in Italy were clearly a glacial relict (in central Europe they are still widespread) it is not impossible to imagine that even a small increase in temperature might have wiped them out. On the other hand, Gyrinus substriatus Stephens, 1828 seems to have disappeared from Pian di Spagna, and this is a species common (or at least, which used to be common) all over Italy. And there remains the mistery of Porhydrus lineatus (Fabricius, 1775), which seems to have disappeared from the whole Po plain in the last ten years of the past century. This is a species which used to be very abundant in the biotopes of the Po plain, sometimes collected in hundreds of specimens. Possibly polluting substances are also involved, although chemical analysis relative to the most common parameters did not show any particular abnormality for the environments investigated. 5 Conclusion The water beetle faunas of the lentic environments of the Po plain were investigated. These environmeents used to have a rich waterbeetle fauna, richer than that of the biotopes situated in the morainic belt or more to the north amid the mountains. Today, unluckily. these faunas are declining, in some cases dramatically, as in the case of the biotopes in the central area of the plain where the arrival of the introduced crayfish Procambarus clarkii has dealt the water beetle communities a final blow, but also in places where the crayfish has not yet arrived. It is difficult to identify the causes because various factors are probably at work simultaneously, but the main suspects are water pollution and global warming. References [1] C. Brivio, Memorie della Società Entomologica Italiana 49, 103 (1970). [2] G. Della Beffa, M. Meregalli, M. Novelli, P. L. Scaramozzino, Rivista Piemontese di Storia Naturale 3, 127 (1982). [3] W. Geiger, P. Alcorlo, A. Baltanás, C. Montes, Biological Invasions 7, 49 (2005).

Scientifica Acta 2, No. 2 (2008) 79 [4] A. E. Magurran, Measuring biogical diversity (Blackwell Publishing, 2004) pp. 1-256. [5] P. Mazzoldi, Natura Bresciana, Annuario del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Brescia 23, 183(1986). [6] F. Pederzani, R. Fabbri, Quaderno di Studi e Notizie di Storia Naturale della Romagna 23, 199 (2006). [7] C. F. Rodríguez, E. Bécares, M. Fernández-Aláez, C. Fernández-Aláez, Biological Invasions 7, 75 (2005). [8] C. Ravizza, Bollettino della Società Entomologica Italiana 104(8), 137(1972).