Hamilton s principle and Symmetries

Similar documents
Homework 3. 1 Goldstein Part (a) Theoretical Dynamics September 24, The Hamiltonian is given by

Generalized Coordinates, Lagrangians

Curves in the configuration space Q or in the velocity phase space Ω satisfying the Euler-Lagrange (EL) equations,

HANDOUT #12: THE HAMILTONIAN APPROACH TO MECHANICS

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. Canonical Transformations-1

(Most of the material presented in this chapter is taken from Thornton and Marion, Chap. 7) p j . (5.1) !q j. " d dt = 0 (5.2) !p j . (5.

NIU PHYS 500, Fall 2006 Classical Mechanics Solutions for HW6. Solutions

Classical Mechanics in Hamiltonian Form

Coordinates, phase space, constraints

The Geometry of Euler s equation. Introduction

PHY 5246: Theoretical Dynamics, Fall November 16 th, 2015 Assignment # 11, Solutions. p θ = L θ = mr2 θ, p φ = L θ = mr2 sin 2 θ φ.

Lecture 5. Alexey Boyarsky. October 21, Legendre transformation and the Hamilton equations of motion

m 1 m 2 π/2 θ NATURAL SCIENCES TRIPOS Wednesday 16 January 2013 THEORETICAL PHYSICS I Answers

FINAL EXAM GROUND RULES

Energy and Equations of Motion

Hamilton-Jacobi theory

MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS

Canonical transformations (Lecture 4)

Hamiltonian Field Theory

1 Hamiltonian formalism

Coordinates, phase space, constraints

Hamilton-Jacobi Formulation of A Non-Abelian Yang-Mills Theories

Chapter 1. Principles of Motion in Invariantive Mechanics

PHY411 Lecture notes Part 2

Hamiltonian Solution I

Part II. Classical Dynamics. Year

arxiv:physics/ v1 [physics.class-ph] 3 Apr 2000

An Exactly Solvable 3 Body Problem

Homework 4. Goldstein 9.7. Part (a) Theoretical Dynamics October 01, 2010 (1) P i = F 1. Q i. p i = F 1 (3) q i (5) P i (6)

Physics 342 Lecture 26. Angular Momentum. Lecture 26. Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I

Adding angular momenta

Physics 339 Euler Angles & Free Precession November 2017 Hamilton s Revenge

On complexified quantum mechanics and space-time

Course 241: Advanced Mechanics. Scholarship Questions

Newton s Second Law in a Noncommutative Space

Physics of Continuous media

Non-associative Deformations of Geometry in Double Field Theory

Quantum Field Theory I Examination questions will be composed from those below and from questions in the textbook and previous exams

Non-Commutative Worlds

HAMILTON S PRINCIPLE

15. Hamiltonian Mechanics

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Physics. Final Examination December 17, 2004

Quantization of scalar fields

Chapter 2 Classical Mechanics

Gravity theory on Poisson manifold with R-flux

Euclidean path integral formalism: from quantum mechanics to quantum field theory

EULER-LAGRANGE TO HAMILTON. The goal of these notes is to give one way of getting from the Euler-Lagrange equations to Hamilton s equations.

Canonical Quantization

CE 530 Molecular Simulation

Hamiltonian Dynamics

REVIEW. Hamilton s principle. based on FW-18. Variational statement of mechanics: (for conservative forces) action Equivalent to Newton s laws!

M2A2 Problem Sheet 3 - Hamiltonian Mechanics

Examples of the Dirac approach to dynamics of systems with constraints

Gauge Fixing and Constrained Dynamics in Numerical Relativity

Hamiltonian flow in phase space and Liouville s theorem (Lecture 5)

Appendix to Lecture 2

Path Integral Quantization of the Electromagnetic Field Coupled to A Spinor

Dirac Structures and the Legendre Transformation for Implicit Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Systems

Physical Dynamics (PHY-304)

06. Lagrangian Mechanics II

arxiv:gr-qc/ v2 6 Apr 1999

Hamilton-Jacobi approach to Berezinian singular systems

Second quantization: where quantization and particles come from?

Lecture I: Constrained Hamiltonian systems

The kinetic equation (Lecture 11)

2 Classical Field Theory

Tailoring BKL to Loop Quantum Cosmology

Equivalence of superintegrable systems in two dimensions

Representations of angular momentum

Unimodularity and preservation of measures in nonholonomic mechanics

From quantum to classical statistical mechanics. Polyatomic ideal gas.

Variable-separation theory for the null Hamilton Jacobi equation

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. The Virial Theorem and The Poisson Bracket-1

On singular lagrangians and Dirac s method

The Dirac Field. Physics , Quantum Field Theory. October Michael Dine Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz

Assignment 8. [η j, η k ] = J jk

Balanced models in Geophysical Fluid Dynamics: Hamiltonian formulation, constraints and formal stability

Lecture 4. Alexey Boyarsky. October 6, 2015

EOS 352 Continuum Dynamics Conservation of angular momentum

The Physical Pendulum

Dynamics of Relativistic Particles and EM Fields

The Matrix Representation of a Three-Dimensional Rotation Revisited

arxiv:math-ph/ v1 27 Feb 2007

Solutions to Problems in Goldstein, Classical Mechanics, Second Edition. Chapter 9

M3/4A16 Assessed Coursework 1 Darryl Holm Due in class Thursday November 6, 2008 #1 Eikonal equation from Fermat s principle

The Particle-Field Hamiltonian

(a p (t)e i p x +a (t)e ip x p

GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION

Quantum Theory and Group Representations

Classical Mechanics and Statistical/Thermodynamics. January 2015

Electric and Magnetic Forces in Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Formalism

M. van Berkel DCT

Lecture II: Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity

-state problems and an application to the free particle

Dynamics and Stability application to submerged bodies, vortex streets and vortex-body systems

Perelman s Dilaton. Annibale Magni (TU-Dortmund) April 26, joint work with M. Caldarelli, G. Catino, Z. Djadly and C.

Quantization of Scalar Field

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 23 Mar 1995

Lecture 19 (Nov. 15, 2017)

VECTORS, TENSORS AND INDEX NOTATION

Transcription:

Hamilton s principle and Symmetries Sourendu Gupta TIFR, Mumbai, India Classical Mechanics 2011 August 18, 2011

The Hamiltonian The change in the Lagrangian due to a virtual change of coordinates is dl = k ṗ k dq k +p k d q k. Using this, one can define a function, called the Hamiltonian, H(p k,q k ), by eliminating q k to write [ ] dh = d p k q k L = q k dp k ṗ k dq k. k k Since p k and q k are independent variables, one has Hamilton s equations q k = H and ṗ k = H. p k q k

An example For a single particle moving in a potential, one can write L = 1 2 m ẋ 2 V(x), and p = L ẋ = mẋ. Eliminating ẋ, the Hamiltonian is Hamilton s equations are H = p ẋ L = 1 2m p 2 +V(x). ẋ = 1 p, and ṗ = V(x). m These are exactly the usual equations of motion.

Poisson brackets Take any two functions on phase space, f(q k,p k ) and g(q k,p k ). Then we define the Poisson bracket of these two functions as [f,g] = [ f g g ] f. q k p k q k p k k Clearly, interchanging f and g in the expression on the right changes the sign. So [f,g] = [g,f]. Also, because of this antisymmetry, [f,f] = 0. Clearly, the time derivative of f is given by the expression df dt = k = k [ f q k + f ] ṗ k q k p k [ f H f H q k p k p k q k ] = [f,h]. We have used the EoM to get the second line from the first.

Time independent Hamiltonians are conserved More generally, for any time-dependent function on phase space f(q k,p k,t), one has df dt = f t +[f,h]. It follows trivially that, for the Hamiltonian itself we have the identity dh dt = H t, so that if the Hamiltonian is time independent, then it is conserved. Other identities for the Poisson bracket include the Jacobi identity [[f,g],h]+[[g,h],f]+[[h,f],g] = 0. Problem 11 Prove the Jacobi identity.

Elementary Poisson brackets Since all the q k and p k are independent variables, their derivatives with respect to each other vanish. So we have [q j,q k ] = 0 and [p j,p k ] = 0. Also, [q i,p j ] = [ qi p j p ] j q i = δ ik δ jk = δ ij. q k p k q k p k k k The E0M can be written in the form q i = [q i,h] and ṗ i = [p i,h]. Using the definition of the Poisson bracket, one sees that these reproduce the canonical equations. If some momenta are conserved, then one clearly has H/ q i = 0. The Hamiltonian does not depend on the corresponding coordinates, i.e., we have a symmetry.

Angular momenta rotate vectors We write the components of the angular momentum L = x p using the Levi-Civita tensor as L i = ǫ ijk x j p k. In order to evaluate the Poisson bracket [L i,x j ] we note that for any three functions on phase space, f, g, h, Using this we find [fg,h] = f[g,h]+g[f,h]. [L i,x j ] = ǫ iαβ [x α p β,x j ] = ǫ iαβ {x α [p β,x j ]+p β [x α,x j ]} = ǫ iαβ x α δ βj = ǫ ijk x k. This is the definition of a vector function on phase space. Problem 12 Prove that the momentum p is a vector function on phase space.

Poisson brackets of angular momenta The Poisson bracket of two components can be easily worked out [L i,l j ] = ǫ iαβ ǫ jγδ [x α p β,x γ p δ ]. Using the identity for Poisson brackets of products, we can write [L i,l j ] = ǫ iαβ ǫ jγδ {x α [p β,x γ p δ ]+p β [x α,x γ p δ ]}. Using the identity a second time we can write [L i,l j ] = ǫ iαβ ǫ jγδ {x α x γ [p β,p δ ]+x α p δ [p β,x γ ] +p β x γ [x α,p δ ]+p β p δ [x α,x γ ]} = ǫ iαβ ǫ jγδ { x α p δ δ βγ +p β x γ δ αδ }

The angular momentum is a vector We have the tensor identity ǫ iαβ ǫ jγβ = δ ij δ αγ δ iγ δ jα, where we have used the summation convention repeated indices are summed. Using this we reduce the Poisson bracket [L i,l j ] = ǫ iαβ ǫ jγδ { x α p δ δ βγ +p β x γ δ αδ } = ǫ iαβ ǫ jγβ {x α p γ x γ p α } renaming dummy indices = {δ ij δ αγ δ iγ δ jα } {x α p γ x γ p α } = x i p j x j p i = ǫ ijk L k. This completes the demonstration that the angular momentum itself is a vector.

Keywords and References Keywords Hamiltonian, Hamilton s equations, Poisson bracket, antisymmetry, Jacobi identity, conserved, symmetry, Levi-Civita tensor, vector function References Goldstein, Chapters 8, 9 Landau, Sections 40, 42