QUARKNET ANNUAL REPORT 2017 UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE, KNOXVILLE S. GOLLAPINNI, K. GUNTHOTI September 24, 2017

Similar documents
PHY 599: How it is usually done

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 5 Nov 2015

PMT Signal Attenuation and Baryon Number Violation Background Studies. By: Nadine Ayoub Nevis Laboratories, Columbia University August 5, 2011

Measurement of Muon Momentum Using Multiple Coulomb Scattering for the MicroBooNE Experiment

Understanding Misclassification in a Five Particle CNN Jonathan Karp 8/04/2016

PoS(ICHEP2016)293. The LArIAT experiment and the charged pion total interaction cross section results on liquid argon. Animesh Chatterjee

The US Liquid Argon Time Projection Chamber (LArTPC) experiments

Spacal alignment and calibration

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 17 Nov 2014

Neutrino Oscillations Physics at DUNE

MEASURING THE LIFETIME OF THE MUON

Cosmic Muon Shower Study with QuarkNet

Liquid Argon TPCs for future neutrino oscillation experiments

The Short Baseline Neutrino Program at Fermilab

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 26 Jul 2011

- ICARUS status and near future

PoS(EPS-HEP2017)074. Darkside Status and Prospects. Charles Jeff Martoff Temple University

Purdue QuarkNetWorkshop 2012

A Demonstration of Light Guides for Light Detection in Liquid Argon TPCs

Neutrino Scattering in Liquid Argon TPC Detectors

9/27 JUNE 2003 SUMMER STAGE PARTICLES REVELATION THROUGH CERENKOV AND SCINTILLATION COUNTER AND THE CEBAF EXPERIMENT

Jonathan Asaadi Syracuse University

Cosmic Ray Detector Software

Measuring Cosmic Ray Muon Decay Constant and Flux

Measurements of Liquid Scintillator Light Yield for Future Neutrino Experiments

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 23 Oct 2007

Search for a diffuse cosmic neutrino flux with ANTARES using track and cascade events

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

Design, Construction, Operation, and Simulation of a Radioactivity Assay Chamber

PoS(EPS-HEP2015)361. Education and Outreach Activities in Astroparticle Physics offered by Netzwerk Teilchenwelt

Rice University Physics 332 LIFETIME OF THE MUON I. INTRODUCTION...2! II. MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES...3! III. ANALYSIS PROCEDURES...7!

PERFORMANCE OF THE ATLAS LIQUID ARGON FORWARD CALORIMETER IN BEAM TESTS

Radioactivity and Ionizing Radiation

Radiation Detector 2016/17 (SPA6309)

Experimental results from ARGONTUBE, a 5 m long drift LAr TPC

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland. Commissioning of the CMS Detector

HiSPARC Detector - Detector Station

PoS(EPS-HEP2015)232. Performance of a 1 m 2 Micromegas Detector Using Argon and Neon based Drift Gases

MicroBooNE: PMT Signal Attenuation and Baryon Number Violation Background Studies. Nadine Ayoub Nevis Laboratories, Columbia University

Dark Matter Detection and PMT Base Optimization

Appendix A2. Particle Accelerators and Detectors The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in Geneva, Switzerland on the Border of France.

PARTICLES REVELATION THROUGH SCINTILLATION COUNTER

Particle Physics (concise summary) QuarkNet summer workshop June 24-28, 2013

PHYS 3446 Lecture #12

Bari Osmanov, University of Florida. OscSNS - proposal for neutrino experiment at ORNL SNS facility

1. The ICARUS T600 detector

LAAPD Performance Measurements in Liquid Xenon

LARGE UNDERGROUND XENON

Developing and Testing a Convolutional Neural Network for Multi-Particle Neutrino Interaction Identification

The Factors That Limit Time Resolution for Photon Detection in Large Cherenkov Detectors

Measurement of Muon Lifetime

Particle Energy Loss in Matter

David Caratelli & Angela Fava1

Educational cosmic ray experiments with Geiger counters

Temperature Dependence Calibration and Correction of the DAMPE BGO Electromagnetic Calorimeter

Precision Calibration of Large Area Micromegas Detectors Using Cosmic Muons

He-3 Neutron Detectors

Activities at the Laboratory of the Nuclear Engineering Department of the Polytechnic University of Valencia

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 3 Feb 2011

Signals in Particle Detectors (1/2?)

Calibration of the Modular Neutron Array (MoNA)

The ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter: Construction, Integration, Commissioning Ph. Schwemling on behalf of the ATLAS LAr Group

ω γ Neutral Current Single Photon Production (NCγ) Outline 1. Oscillation physics 2. NOMAD 3. T2K/MINERvA 4. MicroBooNE 5. MiniBooNE+ 6.

The HARP Experiment. G. Vidal-Sitjes (INFN-Ferrara) on behalf of the HARP Collaboration

The GERmanium Detector Array

MINOS. Physics Program and Construction Status. Karol Lang The University of Texas at Austin. YITP: Neutrinos and Implications for Physics Beyond

Catching Rays Muon Science with Probeware - Bernhard Beck-Winchatz and David Jabon

The International Cosmic Day An Outreach Event for Astroparticle Physics

PHYS 5326 Lecture #2. Wednesday, Jan. 24, 2007 Dr. Jae Yu. Wednesday, Jan. 24, 2007 PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu

Beam Dump Experiments at JLab and SLAC

Neutrino Oscilla8ons

Particle Energy Loss in Matter

LAB 2 1. Measurement of 2. Binomial Distribution

THE GEIGER-MULLER TUBE AND THE STATISTICS OF RADIOACTIVITY

Mass of the electron m 0

Monte Carlo simulations of a first prototype micropattern gas detector system used for muon tomography

Tracking properties of the ATLAS Transition Radiation Tracker (TRT)

Scintillation Detector

Supernova Neutrino Physics with XENON1T and Beyond

Rate Dependency Study on Gas Electron Multiplier Gain

ATLAS New Small Wheel Phase I Upgrade: Detector and Electronics Performance Analysis

Cherenkov Detector. Cosmic Rays Cherenkov Detector. Lodovico Lappetito. CherenkovDetector_ENG - 28/04/2016 Pag. 1

STATUS OF ATLAS TILE CALORIMETER AND STUDY OF MUON INTERACTIONS. 1 Brief Description of the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter

Neutrino Detectors for future facilities - III

The ICARUS Project FRONTIERS IN CONTEMPORARY PHYSICS II. Vanderbilt University, March 5-10, Sergio Navas (ETH Zürich) " Atmospheric neutrinos

Measuring Keepers S E S S I O N 1. 5 A

MiniBooNE Progress and Little Muon Counter Overview

Neutron Structure Functions and a Radial Time Projection Chamber

08 - Miscellaneous and historical detectors

Gamma and X-Ray Detection

Measuring the neutrino mass hierarchy with atmospheric neutrinos in IceCube(-Gen2)

Study of the Neutron Detection Efficiency of the CLAS12 Detector. Keegan Sherman

Scintillation Detectors

DETECTORS. I. Charged Particle Detectors

Scintillation Detectors

Measuring Neutrino Proper0es with Liquid Argon TPCs

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 22 Dec 2013

So, you want to build a neutrino detector?

Chapter Seven (Nuclear Detectors)

The Physics of Particle Detectors

Transcription:

QUARKNET ANNUAL REPORT 2017 UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE, KNOXVILLE S. GOLLAPINNI, K. GUNTHOTI September 24, 2017 The summer 2017 is the first year for QuarkNet at UTK. Two teachers, Tommy Eggleston (West High Science teacher) and Erica Johnson (Halls High School Science teacher) were part of the QuarkNet program. There were two main goals the UTK center wanted to achieve: 1. Cosmic ray studies with the QuarkNet Cosmic Ray Muon Detector 2. Analysis of data from the MicroBooNE neutrino experiment leading to the planned International Neutrino Master Class Program Both teachers performed exceptionally well during their internship period and will take leading roles moving forward. Cosmic ray muon studies with the CRMD: We received the QuarkNet CRMD kit in June and after the CRMD training workshop given by the QuarkNet fellow at UTK, the two teachers started operating the detector. Building the cosmic ray detector provided good hardware experience to the two teachers and taught them the basic elements that make a particle physics experiment. Among the first things, the first goal was to calibrate the detector by plateauing the Photomultiplier Tubes (PMTs). Although the teachers were given the settings for counts per minute at which the PMTs are expected to saturate, the teachers were instructed to perform the full calibration procedure to understand how calibration is typically done in experiments. Both teachers went through the calibration instructions available on the QuarkNet website and prepared their own documentation for calibration. The images above show the selected calibration points from the full calibration studies done by the teachers and the resulting performance plot for all 4 channels. After the initial calibration, both teachers focused on measuring different properties of cosmic rays. Tommy Eggleston focused on measuring muon time of flight where as Erica Johnson focused on measuring the muon lifetime. The images below show the experimental setup by Johnson to measure muon lifetime. Johnson measured a lifetime of 2.35 microseconds with an error of 0.36 microseconds while the expected lifetime is 2.2 microseconds. Johnson then proceeded to explore the parameters that might effect the accuracy of this measurement. These parameters included chosen bin width, number of bins and the gate width. She changed these parameters and monitored how they affected the lifetime value and the background counts. For a particular set of parameters, the best value measured by Johnson was 2.20+/-0.14 micro seconds.

For the time of flight studies, Eggleston employed several stacked plate arrangements to create varying separations and calculated the time of flight value for each arrangement using the E-lab software. The images below show two such experimental arrangements employed by Eggleston and also the results of the cosmic muon flux study done by Eggleston to monitor the flux variation over a range of two days. Based on the data collected for 15 different arrangements, Eggleston constructed a scatter plot of the time of flight and the plate separation. See the first plot on the next page. The slope of the straight line of best fit of the data points represented the reciprocal of the average speed of the cosmic ray muons. The average speed from the data was measured to be (2.78+/-0.146)E8 which falls within 7% of the accepted value for the muon speed. The R 2 value for the scatter plots was found to significantly stronger (0.891) which gives confidence in the fit used.

Data analysis with the MicroBooNE experiment: The MicroBooNE experiment is built to explore the properties of neutrinos. Neutrinos are one of the fundamental particles and are second most abundant in the universe. Neutrinos hold clues to some of the most profound questions in the universe such as the observed matter dominant universe. Another actively pursued questions in neutrino physics is whether there are more than three flavors of neutrinos. The MicroBooNE experiment at Fermilab is aimed at answering this question. Since neutrinos cannot be directly detected as they are neutral, we study them through their interactions with other particles. MicroBooNE uses the innovative Liquid Argon Time Projection Chamber (LArTPC) technology to study neutrinos. This detector is placed in a large tank of liquid argon. Neutrino interactions with argon produce charged particles that ionize argon producing ionization electrons that drift towards the anode in the applied electric field. These electrons register as signals on the anode wire planes, which can later be used to reconstruct charged particle tracks. The images above show the MicroBooNE cryostat being lowered into the experimental hall (left) and one of the first neutrino interaction events observed in MicroBooNE (right). As a first step, a few lecture/discussion sessions were held to teach the teachers about basics of neutrinos, MicroBooNE

experiment and how the liquid argon time projection technology works, along with what techniques experimentalists use to detect neutrino interactions. To help teachers get familiar with neutrino interaction topologies in liquid argon, two practice exercises were conducted where teachers were given 20 event displays in each session and are asked to identify the various particles (tracks) shown in the event displays and form a summary table listing what type of particles were identified. This exercise helped the teachers greatly to both understand how we reconstruct neutrino events and how to identify various particles and their topologies. After this initial step, the next step was to identify and implement a event display that is suitable for high school teachers/students to perform data analysis visually without having to use any coding. The ARGO event display (http://argo-microboone.fnal.gov) developed by Prof. Nathaniel Tagg (MicroBooNE collaborator) was identified as the most suitable browser based event display that can be used by teachers. In collaboration with Prof. Tagg, both teachers explored various features of the ARGO event display and gave extensive feedback to further tune it so it is more suitable for high school students. This process is still ongoing. But, both teachers performed a small physics task with the version of the display that was available at the time. The goal was to measure the velocity of drifting signal ionization electrons and also to calculate the purity of the liquid argon. To make both of these measurements, tracks that cross the detector from anode to cathode, or crossing tracks are required. Based on the information available in the display for the distance covered by tracks in the drift direction (see the image below), and the total drift time to reach the anode plane, based on two clean muon tracks, the teachers were able to calculate a drift velocity of 116 cm/micro-second. The expected value for the drift velocity is 114 cm/microsecond. For the purity of argon measurement, again crossing tracks are selected. To measure purity, the simplest method to compare the charge at the beginning and end of the tracks was adopted. The difference in the deposited charge between the two points gives an estimate of the charge loss due to presence of impurities in argon. Tagg provided a tool (see the image below) that lets the users to select a region of space on the track and obtain information on averaged charge and time in that region. Knowing the directionality of tracks is important for this measurement since we need to identify the beginning and end of track. Implementing the directionality in the display is currently being worked on. With the tools available at the time, both Johnson and Eggleston went on to measure the liquid argon

purity using cosmic muon data from MicroBooNE and observed a electron lifetime value of 8 ms. The electron lifetime value gives a handle on understanding how much charge attenuation happened in the detector and is generally inversely proportional to the impurity contamination in the liquid argon. The 8 ms lifetime measurement by the teachers indicates a signal loss less than 30%. More follow up work will be done on both these data analysis studies. Ultimately the goal is to take the experience gained from Johnson and Eggleston and implement it in the International Neutrino Maser Class that is currently being planned for various Fermilab liquid argon experiments.