Lecture Notes Introduction to Cluster Algebra

Similar documents
Q(x n+1,..., x m ) in n independent variables

A SURVEY OF CLUSTER ALGEBRAS

Lecture Notes Introduction to Cluster Algebra

Lecture Notes Introduction to Cluster Algebra

Lecture 2: Cluster complexes and their parametrizations

Introduction to cluster algebras. Andrei Zelevinsky (Northeastern University) MSRI/Evans Lecture, UC Berkeley, October 1, 2012

Lecture Notes Introduction to Cluster Algebra

Again we return to a row of 1 s! Furthermore, all the entries are positive integers.

QUANTUM F -POLYNOMIALS IN THE THEORY OF CLUSTER ALGEBRAS. A dissertation presented by Thao Tran to The Department of Mathematics

Quantum cluster algebras

CLUSTER ALGEBRA ALFREDO NÁJERA CHÁVEZ

(Affine) generalized associahedra, root systems, and cluster algebras

arxiv:math/ v3 [math.rt] 21 Jan 2004

Tropicalizations of Positive Parts of Cluster Algebras The conjectures of Fock and Goncharov David Speyer

SEEDS AND WEIGHTED QUIVERS. 1. Seeds

A finite universal SAGBI basis for the kernel of a derivation. Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 41(4) P.759-P.792

Problem 1. Let f n (x, y), n Z, be the sequence of rational functions in two variables x and y given by the initial conditions.

arxiv: v5 [math.ra] 17 Sep 2013

The Greedy Basis Equals the Theta Basis A Rank Two Haiku

Lecture 3: Tropicalizations of Cluster Algebras Examples David Speyer

Cluster algebras and derived categories

Lecture I: Introduction to Tropical Geometry David Speyer

= 1 2x. x 2 a ) 0 (mod p n ), (x 2 + 2a + a2. x a ) 2

Quiver mutations. Tensor diagrams and cluster algebras

FACTORIAL CLUSTER ALGEBRAS

NONSINGULAR CURVES BRIAN OSSERMAN

Reversely Well-Ordered Valuations on Polynomial Rings in Two Variables

Cluster algebras II: Finite type classification

The geometry of cluster algebras

Hamiltonian Tournaments and Gorenstein Rings

Combinatorics of Theta Bases of Cluster Algebras

arxiv: v2 [math.co] 14 Jun 2018

Skew-symmetric cluster algebras of finite mutation type

Tropical Elliptic Curves and their j-invariant

Bases for Cluster Algebras from Surfaces

Quivers of Period 2. Mariya Sardarli Max Wimberley Heyi Zhu. November 26, 2014

TROPICAL SCHEME THEORY

LECTURE 4: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (F) AND sl 2 (F)

4.4 Noetherian Rings

MATH 205B NOTES 2010 COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA 53

LOG-CANONICAL COORDINATES FOR POISSON BRACKETS AND RATIONAL CHANGES OF COORDINATES

Quantizations of cluster algebras

Weak Separation, Pure Domains and Cluster Distance

The primitive root theorem

Cluster varieties for tree-shaped quivers and their cohomology

Tropical Varieties. Jan Verschelde

MATH 326: RINGS AND MODULES STEFAN GILLE

Lecture 1. (i,j) N 2 kx i y j, and this makes k[x, y]

Assigned homework problems S. L. Kleiman, fall 2008

Polynomials, Ideals, and Gröbner Bases

Definitions. Notations. Injective, Surjective and Bijective. Divides. Cartesian Product. Relations. Equivalence Relations

Algebraic Geometry and Convex Geometry. A. Khovanskii

GROWTH OF RANK 1 VALUATION SEMIGROUPS

Cluster Algebras and Compatible Poisson Structures

The number of simple modules of a cellular algebra

Introduction to cluster algebras. Sergey Fomin

Cluster Algebras. Philipp Lampe

Lecture 2: Gröbner Basis and SAGBI Basis

Noncommutative Discriminants of Quantum Cluster Algebras

Newton-Okounkov bodies, semigroups of integral points, graded algebras and intersection theory

arxiv: v1 [math.ac] 28 Dec 2007

A connection between number theory and linear algebra

2-FRIEZE PATTERNS AND THE CLUSTER STRUCTURE OF THE SPACE OF POLYGONS

DIVISORS ON NONSINGULAR CURVES

(1) is an invertible sheaf on X, which is generated by the global sections

Fall 2014 Commutative Algebra Final Exam (Solution)

CLUSTER ALGEBRA STRUCTURES ON POISSON NILPOTENT ALGEBRAS

CHAPTER 10: POLYNOMIALS (DRAFT)

R-SYSTEMS PAVEL GALASHIN AND PAVLO PYLYAVSKYY

8. Prime Factorization and Primary Decompositions

Pyramids and monomial blowing-ups

LECTURE 11: SOERGEL BIMODULES

Math 210C. The representation ring

Mutations of non-integer quivers: finite mutation type. Anna Felikson

Minimal order semigroups with specified commuting probability

COMBINATORIAL CURVE NEIGHBORHOODS FOR THE AFFINE FLAG MANIFOLD OF TYPE A 1 1

GOLOMB S ARITHMETICAL SEMIGROUP TOPOLOGY AND A SEMIPRIME SUFFICIENCY CONDITION FOR DIRICHLET S THEOREM

The cocycle lattice of binary matroids

THE DIVERGENCE OF THE SPECIAL LINEAR GROUP OVER A FUNCTION RING

A Grassmann Algebra for Matroids

Gröbner Complexes and Tropical Bases

TORIC WEAK FANO VARIETIES ASSOCIATED TO BUILDING SETS

4 Powers of an Element; Cyclic Groups

Another algorithm for nonnegative matrices

Confluence Algebras and Acyclicity of the Koszul Complex

Dimension Quasi-polynomials of Inversive Difference Field Extensions with Weighted Translations

DEPTH OF FACTORS OF SQUARE FREE MONOMIAL IDEALS

p-adic fields Chapter 7

Algebra Homework, Edition 2 9 September 2010

TIGHT CLOSURE IN NON EQUIDIMENSIONAL RINGS ANURAG K. SINGH

Explicit Methods in Algebraic Number Theory

Lecture 1. Toric Varieties: Basics

Unit 13: Polynomials and Exponents

A NEW COMBINATORIAL FORMULA FOR CLUSTER MONOMIALS OF EQUIORIENTED TYPE A QUIVERS

Chapter 2: Linear Independence and Bases

Math 120 HW 9 Solutions

Polynomial Rings. i=0. i=0. n+m. i=0. k=0

IRREDUCIBILITY OF POLYNOMIALS MODULO p VIA NEWTON POLYTOPES. 1. Introduction

POSITIVITY FOR CLUSTER ALGEBRAS FROM SURFACES

Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009

Transcription:

Lecture Notes Introduction to Cluster Algebra Ivan C.H. Ip Update: June 12, 2017 8 Upper Bounds and Lower Bounds In this section, we study the properties of upper bound and lower bound of cluster algebra. We will then identify the coordinate rings of double Bruhat cells with the upper cluster algebra in the next section. We will use the previous notion of cluster algebra with coefficients in P. P is a semifield. The ambient field F = QP(u 1,..., u n ), a seed is a triple S = (x, y, B) such that x = {x 1,..., x n } are the cluster variables, y = (y 1,..., y n ) are elements of P, and B = (b ij ) is skew-symmetrizable n n integer matrix. Remark 8.1. (1) In the original paper, the exchange matrix B is allowed to be only sign-skew-symmetric (i.e. b ij > 0 b ji < 0 and b ij = 0 b ji = 0). However for simplicity, we will assume B is skew-symmetrizable below. (2) In the original paper, it allows more general coefficients p ± 1,..., p± n P such that y i = p+ i, and forgets the semifield operation. p i 8.1 Upper bound Fix an initial seed S = (x, y, B). Let x j be the adjancent cluster to x defined by x j = x {x j } {x j} Recall that the exchange relation is of the form x j x j = P j (x) for some polynomial P j which does not depend on x j. Let ZP[x] = ZP[x 1,..., x n ] Center for the Promotion of Interdisciplinary Education and Research/ Department of Mathematics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Japan Email: ivan.ip@math.kyoto-u.ac.jp 1

ZP[x ± ] = ZP[x ± 1,..., x± n ] be the ring of polynomials and Laurent polynomials in the cluster variables with coefficients in ZP. Definition 8.2. The upper bound associated with the seed S is U(S) = ZP[x ± ] ZP[x ± 1 ] ZP[x± n ] Definition 8.3. A seed S is called coprime if P 1,..., P n is pairwise coprime in ZP[x]. i.e., any common divisor of P i and P j belongs to P. Theorem 8.4. Assume S and S are related by seed mutation and are both coprime. Then U(S) = U(S ) Proof. See the supplementary notes. Definition 8.5. Fix an initial seed S 0. The upper cluster algbera A = A(S 0 ) F is defined by A(S 0 ) := S S 0 U(S) Corollary 8.6. If all seeds mutation equivalent to S 0 are coprime, then U(S) is independent of choice of S, and U(S) = U(S 0 ) = A(S 0 ) Proposition 8.7. For cluster algebra of geometric type, if the m n matrix B of a seed S has full rank, then all seeds mutation equivalent to S are coprime. Proof. It follows from two Lemma: Lemma 8.8. A seed of geometric type is coprime iff no two columns of B is proportional to each other with coefficient being a ratio of two odd integers. Proof. Let B j be the j-th column of B. If B k = ± b a B j for some odd and coprime integers a, b, then P j = L a + M a, P k = L b + M b and L + M is a common factor. Use Newton polytope. Assume P j and P k has a common factor. Then N(P j ) and N(P k ) are parallel, and we must have the form P j = L a + M a, P k = L b + M b for some monomial L, M and some coprime integers a, b. Then it follows from that fact that t a + 1 and t b + 1 have a common factor iff a, b are odd. 2

Lemma 8.9. Matrix mutations preserve the rank of B Proof. Homework Hence Theorem 8.4 and Corollary 8.6 are satisfied for cluster algbra of geometric type if B has full rank. An important class of examples is given by the coordinate rings of double Bruhat cells G u,v in a complex semisimple Lie group G. 8.2 Lower bound Definition 8.10. Lower bound L(S) is given by L(S) = ZP[x 1, x 1,..., x n, x n] = ZP[x, x 1,..., x n ] The cluster algebra A = A(S 0 ) is the union of all lower bounds A(S 0 ) = S S 0 L(S) Corollary 8.11. We have for any seed S S 0 : L(S) A(S 0 ) A(S 0 ) U(S) Note that the middle inclusion A(S 0 ) A(S 0 ) is just the Laurent Phenomenon! 8.3 Acyclic case: Properties of L(S) U(S) We don t need acyclicity for double Bruhat cell. So just skim through the easy proofs! Definition 8.12. Let Γ(S) be the quiver (or diagram) corresponding to the seed S. A seed S is called acyclic if Γ(S) has no oriented cycles. Fact 8.13. For an acyclic seed, one can reindex such that b ij 0 for all i > j. (i.e. flowing through the quiver) Definition 8.14. A monomial in x 1, x 1,..., x n, x n is called standard if it contains no product of the form x j x j. They span L(S) as ZP-module. Theorem 8.15. The standard monomials in x 1, x 1,..., x n, x n are linear independent over ZP iff S is acyclic. In particular, x j x j P j(x) generates all the relations among x 1, x 1,..., x n, x n. Proof. If: 3

Let m Z n, x m := x m1 1...x n mn where x mj j := It is Laurent polynomial in x 1,..., x n. { m x j j m j 0 (x j ) mj m j < 0 Order m lexicographically. ((4, 3, 2) > (4, 3, 1) > (3, 3, 1) etc.) Since b ij 0 for i > j, the lexicographically smallest Laurent monomial that appears in x mj j equals to x mj j times some monomial in x j+1,..., x n. Hence if m < m, then first monomial in x m precedes the one in x m, i.e. they have different leading term = Linear independence. Only if: [Technical, see [ClusterIII]]. If 1 2... l 1 is oriented cycle, then x 1...x l = K {1,...,l} f K (x 1,..., x n ) k K for some polynomials f K ZP[x]. By reducing x i x i on right hand side, we get linear dependence of standard monomials. Theorem 8.16. If S is coprime and acyclic, then L(S) = U(S) Proof. See [ClusterIII, Section 6] for a quite technical 7-page proof. Corollary 8.17. If a cluster algebra possesses a coprime and acyclic seed, then it coincides with the upper cluster algebra. Theorem 8.18. A(S) = L(S) iff S is acyclic. In particular this applies to cluster algberas of finite type. If S is coprime, then we have A = A Hence to summarize, we have coprime acyclic L(S) A A U(S) S A = U(S) L(S) = A L(S) = A = A = U(S) x k 4

8.4 Examples Example 8.19. All rank n 2 cluster algebras is finitely generated, because all seeds are acyclic, hence A = L(S) is finitely generated by x 1, x 1, x 2, x 2. Example 8.20. A skew-symmetrizable cluster algebra of rank 3 is finitely generated iff it has an acyclic seed. Proof. If A has no acyclic seed, one construct a tropical valuation such that for fixed t 0 T 3, for every r Z >0 : ν i (t) 0 for all i and all t T 3 with d(t 0, t) r ν i (t) < 0 for some i and some t T 3 with d(t 0, t) = r + 1 where ν i (t) := ν(x i (t)) and d(t, t ) is the distance between t and t in T 3. Example 8.21. For S corresponding to the Markov quiver, A(S) A(S). Proof. The exchange relation is of the form: x k x k = p k x2 i + p + k x2 j, (i, j, k) = (1, 2, 3), (2, 3, 1), (3, 1, 2) For any valuation, we have ν(x k ) + ν(x k) = min(2ν(x i ), 2ν(x j )) Hence one can construct a tropical valuation such that ν(x) = 1 for any cluster variable x. In particular A becomes a graded algebra under ν with zero-degree component ZP. Then one construct a nonconstant element y U(S) with ν(y) = 0 by y : = p+ 1 p+ 2 x2 1 + p 1 p 2 x2 2 + p + 1 p 2 x2 3 x 1 x 2 ZP[x ± ] ZP[x ± 3 ] = p+ 1 p+ 2 x 1 + p 2 x 1 x 2 ZP[x ± 1 ] = p 1 p 2 x 2 + p + 1 x 2 x 1 ZP[x ± 2 ] Hence y U(S) with ν(y) = 0 and y / A. Example 8.22 (D. Speyer). For S corresponding to B = 3 0 3 0 3 3 3 3 0 the upper cluster algebra is not finitely generated. 5

8.5 Newton Polytope and Tropical Valuation Most part of the proof uses the notion of tropical valuation, which is some kind of degree on A. In particular, if one can find a valuation ν such that ν(x) 0 for all x S A but ν(y) < 0 for some y A, then y is not generated by S (polynomially). Definition 8.23. Let y = y(x 1,..., x n ) be a Laurent polynomial. The Newton polytope N(y) of y is the convex hull in R n of all lattice points m = (m 1,..., m n ) such that the coefficients x m = x m1 1...xmn n is nonzero in y. Example 8.24. Let y = x 3 1 + 1 + x 1 x 2 2 + x 1 x 2 + 1 x 1 + 1 x 1x. Then N(y) looks like: 2 2 We have some easy facts about Newton polytope: Proposition 8.25. Let P, Q be two Laurent polynomials. Then (1) N(P Q) = Minkowski sum N(P )+N(Q) := {x+y R n x N(P ), y N(Q)} (2) N(P +Q) Convex Hull of N(P ) N(Q). Equality holds if P, Q Q sf (x 1,..., x n ) are subtraction-free rational functions. Example 8.26. Let P = L m + M m be a sum of two Laurent monomials. Then N(P ) is a straightline. If P is a factor of P, then N(P ) is also a straightline parallel to N(P ). Definition 8.27. Let A sf A {0} be the set of nonzero elements of A that can P (x) be written as subtraction-free rational expressions (i.e. Q(x) where P and Q has coefficients in Z 0 P). Definition 8.28. A tropical vaulation on A is a map ν : A {0} R 6

satisfying: ν(p) = 0 p ZP (8.1) ν(xy) = ν(x) + ν(y) x, y A {0} (8.2) ν(x + y) min(ν(x), ν(y)) x, y, x + y A {0} (8.3) ν(x + y) = min(ν(x), ν(y)) x, y A sf (8.4) Lemma 8.29. For any cluster x = {x 1,..., x n } of A and any (ν 1,..., ν n ) R n, there is a tropical valuation ν on A such that ν(x i ) = ν i for i = 1,..., n. Proof. Let y A {0}. Then the tropical valuation is defined by ν(y) = min (m 1ν 1 +... + m n ν n ) m=(m 1,...,m n) N(y) When n = 1, ν looks like the lowest degree of a Laurent polynomial. In general, it is the lowest degree in the direction of (ν 1,..., ν n ). Proof of Theorem 8.18. Theorem 8.16 shows that if S is acyclic and coprime, then L(S) = A(S). The coprimality condition can be lifted by using universal coefficients, i.e. considering generic coefficients P, i.e. extending ZP to a bigger coefficient group A, conclude that L(S) = A(S) in A, and restrict the formula back to the case ZP. Only if: Show that if a seed S is not acyclic, then L(S) A. More precisely, if a seed contains 1 2... l 1 let S (0), S (1),..., S (l 1) be the sequence of seeds such that S (0) = S and S (k) is mutation of S (k 1) in the direction of k. Then the cluster variable y such that {y} = x l 1 x l 2 does not belong to L(S). Construct a valuation ν such that ν(x) 0 for x L(S), but ν(y) < 0. Construct by induction on l. For l = 3, set ν 1 = min( b 21, b 31 ), ν 2 = ν 3 = 1, ν i = 0 for i > 3. Then check directly that ν(x i ) 0, ν(x i ) 0 but ν(y) = 1 for y = x 2. For induction, apply the construction to S (1), which then consists of the smaller cycle 2 3... l 2, and check that ν still satisfies the condition we want. References [ClusterIII] A. Berenstein, S. Fomin, A. Zelevinsky, Cluster Algebras III: Upper bounds and double Bruhat cells, Duke Mathematical Journal, 126 (1), (2005): 1-51 7