Nitrogenase MoFe protein from Clostridium pasteurianum at 1.08 Å resolution: comparison with the Azotobacter vinelandii MoFe protein

Similar documents
Structure and evolution of the spliceosomal peptidyl-prolyl cistrans isomerase Cwc27

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Supplementary figure 1. Comparison of unbound ogm-csf and ogm-csf as captured in the GIF:GM-CSF complex. Alignment of two copies of unbound ovine

The structure of vanadium nitrogenase reveals an unusual bridging ligand

Table 1. Crystallographic data collection, phasing and refinement statistics. Native Hg soaked Mn soaked 1 Mn soaked 2

Esser et al. Crystal Structures of R. sphaeroides bc 1

Structural insights into Aspergillus fumigatus lectin specificity - AFL binding sites are functionally non-equivalent

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Supplementary Figure 1. Aligned sequences of yeast IDH1 (top) and IDH2 (bottom) with isocitrate

Nature Structural & Molecular Biology: doi: /nsmb Supplementary Figure 1

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Experimental and Computational Mutagenesis to Investigate the. Positioning of a General Base within an Enzyme Active Site

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Full wwpdb X-ray Structure Validation Report i

Supporting information to: Time-resolved observation of protein allosteric communication. Sebastian Buchenberg, Florian Sittel and Gerhard Stock 1

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Full wwpdb X-ray Structure Validation Report i

Full wwpdb X-ray Structure Validation Report i

Full wwpdb X-ray Structure Validation Report i

FW 1 CDR 1 FW 2 CDR 2

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. doi: /nature07461

Supplementary Figure 3 a. Structural comparison between the two determined structures for the IL 23:MA12 complex. The overall RMSD between the two

Bacterial protease uses distinct thermodynamic signatures for substrate recognition

Supporting Information

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

What makes a good graphene-binding peptide? Adsorption of amino acids and peptides at aqueous graphene interfaces: Electronic Supplementary

Supplementary Information. The protease GtgE from Salmonella exclusively targets. inactive Rab GTPases

1. What is an ångstrom unit, and why is it used to describe molecular structures?

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

ENZYME MECHANISMS, PROTEASES, STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY

Sensitive NMR Approach for Determining the Binding Mode of Tightly Binding Ligand Molecules to Protein Targets

Full wwpdb X-ray Structure Validation Report i

Electronic Supplementary Information

Supporting Online Material for

Full wwpdb X-ray Structure Validation Report i

Model Mélange. Physical Models of Peptides and Proteins

Time-dependence of key H-bond/electrostatic interaction distances in the sirna5-hago2 complexes... Page S14

Viewing and Analyzing Proteins, Ligands and their Complexes 2

Full wwpdb X-ray Structure Validation Report i

Supplementary Figure 1 Crystal packing of ClR and electron density maps. Crystal packing of type A crystal (a) and type B crystal (b).

Supplementary Information

Supporting Information

Electronic Supplementary Information. A biologically relevant fluorescent probe to assess the binding of ceramide to the CERT transfer protein

Supplementary Information. Viral immunoevasin targeting of a Natural Killer cell receptor family

Supplementary Figure 1. Biochemical and sequence alignment analyses the

Supplementary Information Intrinsic Localized Modes in Proteins

Full wwpdb X-ray Structure Validation Report i

Supplemental Information for: Characterizing the Membrane-Bound State of Cytochrome P450 3A4: Structure, Depth of Insertion and Orientation

Structural insights into energy regulation of light-harvesting complex from spinach CP29

Automated identification of functional dynamic contact networks from X-ray crystallography

Supplementary Information

Exam I Answer Key: Summer 2006, Semester C

NMR study of complexes between low molecular mass inhibitors and the West Nile virus NS2B-NS3 protease

Protein Structure and Visualisation. Introduction to PDB and PyMOL

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURES

Supplementary information for:

Secondary Structure. Bioch/BIMS 503 Lecture 2. Structure and Function of Proteins. Further Reading. Φ, Ψ angles alone determine protein structure

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Supplementary Information

SI Text S1 Solution Scattering Data Collection and Analysis. SI references

Stabilizing the CH2 domain of an Antibody by Engineering in an Enhanced Aromatic Sequon

Supporting Information. UV-induced ligand exchange in MHC class I protein crystals

Diphthamide biosynthesis requires a radical iron-sulfur enzyme. Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA

Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) for Chem. Commun. Unveiling the three- dimensional structure of the green pigment of nitrite- cured meat

Nature Structural & Molecular Biology: doi: /nsmb Supplementary Figure 1

Acta Crystallographica Section F

Structure, mechanism and ensemble formation of the Alkylhydroperoxide Reductase subunits. AhpC and AhpF from Escherichia coli

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Supporting Information

Packing of Secondary Structures

IgE binds asymmetrically to its B cell receptor CD23

Supplementary Information. Broad Spectrum Anti-Influenza Agents by Inhibiting Self- Association of Matrix Protein 1

Plasmid Relevant features Source. W18N_D20N and TrXE-W18N_D20N-anti

Structurale, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, CEA, Grenoble, France

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology: doi: /nsmb.2938

Supplementary Figure 1 Crystal contacts in COP apo structure (PDB code 3S0R)

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology: doi: /nsmb Supplementary Figure 1. Experimental approach for enhancement of unbiased Fo Fc maps.

Three-dimensional structure of a viral genome-delivery portal vertex

Table S1. Overview of used PDZK1 constructs and their binding affinities to peptides. Related to figure 1.

Supplemental Information

Ion Translocation Across Biological Membranes. Janos K. Lanyi University of California, Irvine

Physiochemical Properties of Residues

Supplementary Figure S1. Urea-mediated buffering mechanism of H. pylori. Gastric urea is funneled to a cytoplasmic urease that is presumably attached

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Structural basis for catalytically restrictive dynamics of a high-energy enzyme state

Comparison between Bacteriorhodopsin and Halorhodopsin. Halorhodopsin (HR) and Bacteriorhodopsin (BR) belong to a subfamily of

Central Dogma. modifications genome transcriptome proteome

Acta Cryst. (2014). D70, doi: /s

Basic Principles of Protein Structures

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

6 Discussion. 6.1 Bacterial reaction center X-Ray crystallography of RC mutants

NB-DNJ/GCase-pH 7.4 NB-DNJ+/GCase-pH 7.4 NB-DNJ+/GCase-pH 4.5

Structural characterization of NiV N 0 P in solution and in crystal.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Transcription:

Acta Cryst. (2015). D71, 274-282, doi:10.1107/s1399004714025243 Supporting information Volume 71 (2015) Supporting information for article: Nitrogenase MoFe protein from Clostridium pasteurianum at 1.08 Å resolution: comparison with the Azotobacter vinelandii MoFe protein Li-Mei Zhang, Christine N. Morrison, Jens T. Kaiser and Douglas C. Rees

Supplementary Materials for Nitrogenase MoFe-Protein from Clostridium pasteurianum at 1.08 Å Resolution: Comparison to the Azotobacter vinelandii MoFe-protein Li-Mei Zhang a, Christine N. Morrison a, Jens T. Kaiser a, Douglas C. Rees a,b* a Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, and b Howard Hughes Medical Institute, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA 91125, USA. * Correspondence to Douglas C. Rees: dcrees@caltech.edu, Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, California Institute of Technology, MC 164-96, 1200 E. California Blvd, Pasadena CA 91125, USA. 1

Supplementary Tables Table S1. Polar interactions between residues α386 α408 in the irregularly structured insertion loop of the α-subunit and the rest of the Cp1 structure. A distance cutoff of 4.0 Å was used for this calculation. Insertion Loop Residues α-subunit Residues Distance (Å) Asp α389-od2 Arg α42-ne 2.93 Pro α394-o Asn α191-od1 2.95 Pro α394-o His α187-ne2 3.28 Asp α401-n Lys α276-o 2.9 Lys α404-nz Gly α199-o 2.98 Arg α406-o Tyr α277-o 3.47 Arg α406-n Tyr α277-o 3.04 Arg α406-nh1 Gln α205-oe1 3.37 Arg α406-nh1 Asp α253-o 2.8 Arg α406-nh2 Tyr α277-o 3.45 Insertion Loop Residues β-subunit Residues Distance (Å) Asp α389-od1 Thr β72-og1 3.95 Asn α392-nd2 Glu β73-oe2 3.65 2

Table S2. Comparison of interatomic distances in the FeMo-cofactors of Cp1 and Av1. Bond Distances a (Å) Metal metal Distances a (Å) Cp1 Av1 Cp1 Av1 FE1 S1A 2.31 2.30 FE1 FE2 2.66 2.67 FE1 S2A 2.26 2.27 FE1 FE3 2.67 2.67 FE1 S4A 2.31 2.29 FE1 FE4 2.61 2.66 FE1 SG-Cys α272 2.28 2.27 FE2 FE3 2.68 2.67 FE2 CX 2.01 2.00 FE2 FE4 2.66 2.65 FE2 S1A 2.27 2.26 FE2 FE6 2.58 2.58 FE2 S2A 2.27 2.25 FE3 FE4 2.66 2.64 FE2 S2B 2.22 2.20 FE3 FE7 2.59 2.59 FE3 CX 2.01 1.99 FE4 FE5 2.58 2.61 FE3 S2A 2.29 2.27 FE5 FE6 2.63 2.63 FE3 S4A 2.28 2.25 FE5 FE7 2.63 2.63 FE3 S5A 2.23 2.23 FE6 FE7 2.59 2.60 FE4 CX 1.96* 2.00 Mo1 FE5 2.69 2.73 FE4 S1A 2.30 2.29 Mo1 FE6 2.68 2.67 FE4 S3A 2.23 2.24 Mo1 FE7 2.67 2.68 FE4 S4A 2.31 2.29 FE5 CX 1.98 2.01 FE2 FE5 3.68 3.69 FE5 S1B 2.26 2.27 FE2 FE7 3.69 3.69 FE5 S3A 2.26 2.26 FE3 FE5 3.71 3.71 FE5 S4B 2.24 2.26 FE3 FE6 3.69 3.68 FE6 CX 2.02 2.00 FE4 FE6 3.70 3.72 FE6 S1B 2.23 2.24 FE4 FE7 3.69 3.69 FE6 S2B 2.18 2.17 FE6 S3B 2.23 2.22 FE1 FE5 4.96 5.02 FE7 CX 2.00* 1.99 FE1 FE6 4.98 5.00 FE7 S3B 2.25 2.25 FE1 FE7 4.99 5.00 FE7 S4B 2.23 2.22 Mo1 FE2 5.03 5.03 FE7 S5A 2.20 2.21 Mo1 FE3 5.05 5.05 Mo1 ND1-His α482 2.34* 2.32 Mo1 FE4 5.04 5.09 Mo1 O5-HCA 2.22 2.20 Mo1 O7-HCA 2.18* 2.17 Mo1 S1B 2.35 2.36 Mo1 FE1 6.95 7.00 Mo1 S3B 2.37 2.37 Mo1 S4B 2.35 2.35 3

a The reported distances are the average between the non-crystallographically related pairs of the FeMocofactors in the Av1 and Cp1 structures, respectively. The standard deviations of the averaged distances are all smaller than 0.03 Å unless marked with * for those of 0.03 Å. 4

Table S3. Comparison of the interatomic distances in the P-clusters of Cp1 and Av1. Bond Distances a (Å) Metal metal Distances (Å) Cp1 Av1 Cp1 Av1 Conformation A: P OX form FE1 S1 2.47 2.48 FE1 FE2 2.50 2.53 FE1 S2A 2.30 2.31 FE1 FE3 2.76 2.75 FE1 S3A 2.30 2.29 FE1 FE4 2.63 2.57 FE1 SG-Cys β48 2.36 2.33 FE1 FE5 4.77 4.86 FE2 S1 2.39 2.38 FE1 FE6 5.63 5.85 FE2 S2A 2.33 2.32 FE1 FE7 5.34 5.48 FE2 S4A 2.33 2.32 FE1 FE8 2.87 2.94 FE2 SG-Cys α145 2.32 2.32 FE2 FE3 2.78 2.80 FE3 S2A 2.32 2.30 FE2 FE4 2.62 2.63 FE3 S3A 2.28 2.27 FE2 FE5 5.63 5.78 FE3 S4A 2.33 2.33 FE2 FE6 5.95 6.14 FE3 SG-Cys α53 2.30 2.29 FE2 FE7 6.67 6.80 FE4 S1 2.39 2.36 FE2 FE8 4.34 4.37 FE4 S3A 2.28 2.29 FE3 FE4 2.71 2.72 FE4 S4A 2.32 2.31 FE3 FE5 6.09 6.19 FE4 SG-Cys α79 2.34 2.31 FE3 FE6 7.76 7.98 FE5 N-Cys α79 2.12 2.11 FE3 FE7 7.56 7.71 FE5 S2B 2.19 2.28 FE3 FE8 5.42 5.48 FE5 S4B 2.37 2.31 FE4 FE5 3.60 3.69 FE5 SG-Cys α79 2.37 2.32 FE4 FE6 5.49 5.68 FE6 OG-Ser β141 1.93* 1.91 FE4 FE7 5.45 5.54 FE6 S2B 2.29 2.34 FE4 FE8 3.85 3.82 FE6 S3B 2.33 2.33 FE5 FE6 3.76 3.98 FE6 SG-Cys β106 2.41 2.39 FE5 FE7 2.77 2.83 FE7 S2B 2.30 2.32 FE5 FE8 3.39 3.43 FE7 S3B 2.32 2.33 FE6 FE7 2.76 2.80 FE7 S4B 2.32 2.29 FE6 FE8 3.21 3.30 FE7 SG-Cys β23 2.33 2.37 FE7 FE8 2.69 2.75 FE8 S1 2.36 2.36 FE8 S3B 2.27 2.28 FE8 S4B 2.32 2.32 FE8 SG-Cys β48 2.31 2.32 FE5 S1 a 3.67 3.82 FE6 S1 a 3.65* 3.86 5

Conformation B: P N form FE5 S1 2.58 2.65* FE5 FE1 3.83 3.91 FE5 S2B 2.45 2.43 FE5 FE2 4.63 4.72* FE5 S4B 2.23 2.23 FE5 FE3 5.36 5.48 FE5 SG-Cys α79 2.28 2.27 FE5 FE4 2.89 2.96 FE6 S1 2.53 2.63 FE5 FE6 2.52 2.55* FE6 S2B 2.50 2.52 FE5 FE7 2.75 2.79 FE6 S3B 2.36 2.31 FE5 FE8 2.51 2.49* FE6 SG-Cys β106 2.27 2.26 FE6 FE1 4.55 4.65 FE6 FE2 4.86 4.94 FE6 FE3 6.64 6.75 FE6 FE4 4.43 4.51 FE6 FE7 2.78 2.81 FE6 FE8 2.37 2.34 a The reported distances are the average between the non-crystallographically related pairs of the P-clusters in the Av1 and Cp1 structures, respectively. The standard deviations of the averaged distances are all smaller than 0.03 Å unless marked with * for those ranging from 0.03 to 0.05 Å. b The distances between Fe5/6 and S1 in the P ox conformation are included to show the changes of the distances relative to the P N conformation. 6

Table S4. Estimation of the occupancy number of Fe16 in different Cp1 crystals by analysis of the MAD data. Sample ID 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Protein Source PrepA PrepB PrepB PrepB PrepC PrepC PrepC Resolution Range a (Å) 40-1.42 40-1.40 40-1.12 40-1.30 40-1.45 40-1.55 40-1.65 B-Overall b (Å 2 ) 19.08 19.06 16.29 17.94 18.34 18.24 18.72 Edge Jump c AvgClust Fe d 4.79 (0.33) 4.77 (0.33) 4.36 (0.34) 4.49 (0.31) 4.33 (0.23) 4.32 (0.22) 4.61 (0.31) Fe16 2.37 2.49 2.18 2.44 2.07 2.22 2.15 Fe16/ AvgClust Fe 0.49 0.52 0.50 0.54 0.48 0.51 0.47 ON of Fe16 e 0.35 0.37 0.36 0.37 0.35 0.37 0.33 Electron Density f AvgClust Fe d 5.64 (0.19) 5.65 (0.21) 6.60 (0.20) 5.45 (0.17) 5.69 (0.21) 5.79 (0.19) 5.85 (0.19) Fe16 3.05 3.17 3.5 3.03 2.98 3.02 3.18 Fe16/ AvgClust Fe 0.55 0.56 0.53 0.56 0.52 0.52 0.54 a The resolution range is for the higher resolution reference diffraction data. The highest resolution limits for the anomalous diffraction data collected across Fe K-edge are 1.9 2.1 Å. b The overall B-factor is calculated for all the atoms in the crystallographic structure. c The edge jump is defined by the difference of f'' above and below Fe K-edge (at 7130 ev and 7080 ev respectively, except for Crystal #5-7 for which 7100 ev is used). All the Fe in the P-cluster and the FeMocofactor of Cp1 are used in calculating the averaged edge jump (AveClustFe). d The numbers in parentheses are the standard deviations of the values listed in the same cell. e The occupancy number (ON) of Fe16 is estimated by comparing the ratio of the edge jump of Fe16 to the average of the Fe in the metalloclusters with that of the normalized X-ray absorption spectra of ferrous sulfate heptahydrate to the MoFe-protein. When normalized at 7150 ev, the ratio of the defined edge jump between ferrous sulfate heptahydrate and the MoFe-protein is around 1.4. f Fe5 and Fe6 in the P-cluster are excluded from the average due to the existence of alternative structures with variable occupancy at these two Fe sites. 7

Supplementary Figuures Figure S1. Registry correction to the previously reported Cp1 structure (PDB ID 1MIO) in the long insertion loop of the α-subunit. The Cp1 structure refined at 1.08 Å resolution in the present work is depicted with black bonds, and the 1MIO structure is highlighted in red. The electron density map of the 1.08 Å resolution Cp1 structure is displayed at a contour level of 1.5 σ in paleblue color. The registry error was initiated by mis-placing D412 into K413 residue position, and extends to residue A420. 8

Figure S2. Superposition of the α- and β-subunits of Cp1 and Av1. Cartoon representations of (A) the α-subunits and (B) the β-subunits of Cp1 (red) and Av1 (blue, partially transparent) following superposition of the secondary structures using the program COOT. The α-subunit insertion loop (residues α376 α429) in Cp1 and the β- subunit deletion (relative to residues β2 β47 in the Av1 structure) are highlighted in lemon and green, respectively. The two metalloclusters, the FeMo-cofactor and the P- cluster, are highlighted as sticks. The average root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) of least square fitting for two α- and β-subunits are plotted in C and D, respectively, plotted against the residue number of Cp1. 9

Figure S3. Contacts between the insertion loop and the rest of Cp1. The backbone atoms of the α- and β-subunits are shown as cartoons highlighted in cyan and grey color, respectively, except for the insertion loop (blue). The contacting residues and the two metalloclusters are represented by sticks. Residues in the insertion loop are labeled with red fonts, while other residues are labeled in black. The C atoms are highlighted in light grey color, N in blue, O in red, S in yellow, Fe in orange, and Mo in cyan. 10

Figure S4. The 2Fo-Fc electron density map around the Cp1 P-cluster in two perpendicular views ((A) and (B)). The map is illustrated in light blue color and contoured at 3σ. The P-cluster and coordinated ligand residues are represented by sticks, except for the alterative conformations for Fe5 and Fe6 and the side chain of Ser β141 (corresponding to the reduced P N state) shown as thin lines. Fe5 OX /Fe6 OX and Fe5 N /Fe6 N represent the conformations corresponding to the P OX and P N states, respectively, of the P-cluster. C atoms are highlighted in light grey color, N in blue, O in red, S in yellow, Fe in orange. 11

Figure S5. Helices connecting the mononuclear metal binding (MMB)-site and the two metalloclusters, the FeMo-cofactor and P-cluster. The cartoon representations of the two helices from the α- and β-subunit between the MMB-site and the two metalloclusters are depicted in grey and cyan color, respectively. The hydrogen bonding network between water molecules and indicated residues are represented by black dashed lines. C atoms are highlighted in light grey color, N in blue, O in red, S in yellow, Fe in orange, and Mo in cyan. HCA: homocitrate. 12

Figure S6. Hydrogen bonding network between the P-cluster and the FeMo-cofactor in Cp1. The four helices from the α- and β-subunits are represented as ribbons in gray color. The P-cluster and the FeMo-cofactor and their coordinated residues are highlighted as sticks, together with residues in the four helices participating in the hydrogen bonding network. Water molecules are shown as red spheres. The two water molecules in the conserved water channel are highlighted with red dotted surfaces. The hydrogen bonding network between water molecules and residues are depicted by black dashed lines. C atoms are shown in light grey color, N in blue, O in red, S in yellow, Fe in orange, and Mo in cyan. 13