agree w/input bond => + sign disagree w/input bond => - sign

Similar documents
Time Response Analysis (Part II)

Second Order Systems

Dr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Review

Dynamic circuits: Frequency domain analysis

Course Summary. The course cannot be summarized in one lecture.

MAS107 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering Dynamics and Control II Fall 2007

Control System. Contents

8.1.6 Quadratic pole response: resonance

Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!

Time Response of Systems

Control of Manufacturing Processes

Control Systems I. Lecture 6: Poles and Zeros. Readings: Emilio Frazzoli. Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich

Radar Dish. Armature controlled dc motor. Inside. θ r input. Outside. θ D output. θ m. Gearbox. Control Transmitter. Control. θ D.

Discrete Systems. Step response and pole locations. Mark Cannon. Hilary Term Lecture

Professional Portfolio Selection Techniques: From Markowitz to Innovative Engineering

Raktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 632: Design of Advance Flight Control System. Preliminaries

AN INTRODUCTION TO THE CONTROL THEORY

This homework will not be collected or graded. It is intended to help you practice for the final exam. Solutions will be posted.

STABILITY. Have looked at modeling dynamic systems using differential equations. and used the Laplace transform to help find step and impulse

APPLICATIONS FOR ROBOTICS

Task 1 (24%): PID-control, the SIMC method

Analysis and Design of Control Systems in the Time Domain

Laplace Transform Part 1: Introduction (I&N Chap 13)

Dr. Ian R. Manchester

Last week: analysis of pinion-rack w velocity feedback

Laplace Transforms and use in Automatic Control

Lecture 5: Linear Systems. Transfer functions. Frequency Domain Analysis. Basic Control Design.

Frequency Response of Linear Time Invariant Systems

GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL of ELECTRICAL & COMPUTER ENGINEERING FINAL EXAM. COURSE: ECE 3084A (Prof. Michaels)

Homework 7 - Solutions

School of Engineering Faculty of Built Environment, Engineering, Technology & Design

EE C128 / ME C134 Final Exam Fall 2014

Raktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles. Frequency Response-Design Method

Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises

Step Response Analysis. Frequency Response, Relation Between Model Descriptions

Chapter 2 SDOF Vibration Control 2.1 Transfer Function

GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL of ELECTRICAL & COMPUTER ENGINEERING FINAL EXAM. COURSE: ECE 3084A (Prof. Michaels)

Introduction & Laplace Transforms Lectures 1 & 2

Math 215/255 Final Exam (Dec 2005)

20.6. Transfer Functions. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes

Frequency methods for the analysis of feedback systems. Lecture 6. Loop analysis of feedback systems. Nyquist approach to study stability

Video 6.1 Vijay Kumar and Ani Hsieh

Introduction to Root Locus. What is root locus?

Dynamic Response. Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu. Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Izmir Institute of Technology.

EECS C128/ ME C134 Final Thu. May 14, pm. Closed book. One page, 2 sides of formula sheets. No calculators.

Frequency Response Analysis

ECE 388 Automatic Control

LTI Systems (Continuous & Discrete) - Basics

Controls Problems for Qualifying Exam - Spring 2014

Sinusoidal Forcing of a First-Order Process. / τ

Control for. Maarten Steinbuch Dept. Mechanical Engineering Control Systems Technology Group TU/e

( ) Frequency Response Analysis. Sinusoidal Forcing of a First-Order Process. Chapter 13. ( ) sin ω () (

Control of Manufacturing Processes

z Transform System Analysis

FATIMA MICHAEL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY

Plan of the Lecture. Goal: wrap up lead and lag control; start looking at frequency response as an alternative methodology for control systems design.

ECE Circuit Theory. Final Examination. December 5, 2008

GATE EE Topic wise Questions SIGNALS & SYSTEMS

Frequency domain analysis

Performance of Feedback Control Systems

R. W. Erickson. Department of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering University of Colorado, Boulder

ROOT LOCUS. Consider the system. Root locus presents the poles of the closed-loop system when the gain K changes from 0 to. H(s) H ( s) = ( s)

Systems Analysis and Control

Exercise 8: Level Control and PID Tuning. CHEM-E7140 Process Automation

Video 5.1 Vijay Kumar and Ani Hsieh

Dr Ian R. Manchester

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL

(b) A unity feedback system is characterized by the transfer function. Design a suitable compensator to meet the following specifications:

Exam. 135 minutes + 15 minutes reading time

Control Systems I. Lecture 4: Diagonalization, Modal Analysis, Intro to Feedback. Readings: Emilio Frazzoli

EE/ME/AE324: Dynamical Systems. Chapter 7: Transform Solutions of Linear Models

ECEN 605 LINEAR SYSTEMS. Lecture 20 Characteristics of Feedback Control Systems II Feedback and Stability 1/27

EE451/551: Digital Control. Chapter 3: Modeling of Digital Control Systems

First and Second Order Circuits. Claudio Talarico, Gonzaga University Spring 2015

CDS 101/110: Lecture 3.1 Linear Systems

1 Controller Optimization according to the Modulus Optimum

100 (s + 10) (s + 100) e 0.5s. s 100 (s + 10) (s + 100). G(s) =

Often, in this class, we will analyze a closed-loop feedback control system, and end up with an equation of the form

R a) Compare open loop and closed loop control systems. b) Clearly bring out, from basics, Force-current and Force-Voltage analogies.

Control Systems. EC / EE / IN. For

2.161 Signal Processing: Continuous and Discrete Fall 2008

Problem Weight Score Total 100

Radar Dish. Armature controlled dc motor. Inside. θ r input. Outside. θ D output. θ m. Gearbox. Control Transmitter. Control. θ D.

First-Order Low-Pass Filter

R10 JNTUWORLD B 1 M 1 K 2 M 2. f(t) Figure 1

Lecture 25: Tue Nov 27, 2018

1 (s + 3)(s + 2)(s + a) G(s) = C(s) = K P + K I

Linear State Feedback Controller Design

Stability. X(s) Y(s) = (s + 2) 2 (s 2) System has 2 poles: points where Y(s) -> at s = +2 and s = -2. Y(s) 8X(s) G 1 G 2

EE C128 / ME C134 Midterm Fall 2014

Dynamic Behavior. Chapter 5

Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!

ME 132, Fall 2015, Quiz # 2

Vibrations Qualifying Exam Study Material

MATH 251 Examination II April 7, 2014 FORM A. Name: Student Number: Section:

Course roadmap. Step response for 2nd-order system. Step response for 2nd-order system

MODELING OF CONTROL SYSTEMS

Chapter 8: Frequency Domain Analysis

Control Systems I. Lecture 5: Transfer Functions. Readings: Emilio Frazzoli. Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich

Transcription:

1 ME 344 REVIEW FOR FINAL EXAM LOCATION: CPE 2.204 M. D. BRYANT DATE: Wednesday, May 7, 2008 9-noon Finals week office hours: May 6, 4-7 pm Permitted at final exam: 1 sheet of formulas & calculator I. Physical systems to bond graph Mechanical translational & rotational free body diagrams series elements: 0 parallel elements: 1 electrical series elements: 1 parallel elements: 0 fluidic II. Power P = ef III. Energy E = P dt = ef dt IV. Bond graph elements resistance: R energy storage: C and I links between domains: GY: effort to flow, flow to effort TF: effort to effort, flow to flow sources: effort: Se flow: Sf junctions 0: common effort, balance of flows 1: common flow, balance of efforts power flows: arrows indicate positive direction causality assignment via rules of cookbook approach integral (desired for energy storage elements) independent energy storage (IESE) # IESE determines system order derivative (may be forced on some ESE) dependent or linked devices state equations # St Eqns = # IESE extract from bond graph start with IESE usually revolves around junctions 0 => sum flows and/or common effort 1 => sum efforts and/or common flow input bond contribution ALWAYS on LHS causal stroke /arrow touching only applies to balances

agree w/input bond => + sign disagree w/input bond => - sign 2 V. System response Definition of solution: function that renders the differential equation(s) an identity devoid of derivatives Also satisfies initial conditions linear system x = A x + u homogeneous postulate x i homogeneous = a e λ i t substitute into eqn, get & solve characteristic equation [λ i I - A]a = 0 get eigenvalues λ i back substitute λ i [λ i I - A]a i = 0 solve eigenvectors a i = [a ii ] particular soln: u(t) = Uo us(t) step function: us(t) Note: u(t) = U o e st us(t) step, s = 0 growing exponential, s = σ > 0 decaying exponential, s = σ < 0 oscillatory, s = jω sin ωt, take Im parts cos ωt, take Re parts exp.grow/decay oscillation, s = σ + j ω sin ωt, take Im parts cos ωt, take Re parts variation of parameters integration technique n complete x complete = x particular + x i homogeneous i=1

initial conditions apply to complete solution x complete determine arbitrary constants 1st order system " x + x = h(t) general approach (integrate equations) time constant τ 2nd order system natural frequency ω n damping ratio ζ x + 2"# n x + # 2 n x = f (t) damped natural frequency ω d = ω n 1 - ζ 2 ONLY IF 0 ζ < 1 higher order system 3 VI. Superposition for multiple input excitation functions linear system multi-inputs fi(t) multiple outputs x i p Ν complete particular xp = x i p i=1 VII. Stability eigenvalues IF EVEN ONE Re(λ i ) > 0, e λt becomes large => UNSTABLE all Re(λ i ) < 0, stable stable but oscillatory: Re(λ i ) < 0 but Im(λ i ) 0 VIII. Transfer functions ratio: (specified) output to (specified) input basis: f(t) = F(s) e st input, x(t) = X(s) e st output derive transfer function G(s) = X(s)/F(s) substitute x(t) = X(s) e st, f(t) = F(s) e st ordinary diff eqn, solve for X(s)/F(s) state equations, Cramer's rule for X(s) Laplace transform F(s) = L{ f (t);t " s} = $ % f (t)e #st dt, Apply to Diff. Eq. with input f(t), output x(t) Solve for function G(s) = X(s)/F(s) Inverse Laplace (tables used backwards) => x(t) differential equation(s) from transfer: s = d/dt t= 0

characteristic equation from denominator 4 poles = eigenvalues (s poles transfer ) zeroes from numerator (s zeroes transfer 0) Block Diagrams n Blocks Cascaded, total = product: G = G 1 G 2 G n Summing junctions Total transfer function from block diagram IX. Bode plots Directly from measured sinusoidal data Transfer function G(s) G(jω) = G(s) s = jω Bode (vs. log 10 ω) magnitude: MdB = 20 log 10 M(ω), M(ω) = G(jω) 1st breaks 20 db/dec @ ω = 1/τ 2nd breaks 40 db/dec @ ω = ω n zeroes move MdB up/ poles move MdB down phase: φ(ω) = arg G(jω) 1st through 90, 45 @ ω = 1/τ 2nd through 180, 90 @ ω = ω n zeroes => positive, poles => negative steady state response to A sin ωοt: A M(ωο) sin[ωοt + φ(ωο)] read M(ωο) and φ(ωο) from Bode plot X. Multiport storage elements C device I device energy E = E(q) = V q (q), e i = energy E = E(p) = T p (p), f i = V q q i T p p i XI. Control Systems Goal: output tracks input Feedback: reduces effects of disturbances PID controllers definitions plant controller feedback closed loop transfer function

G cl (s) = X(s) R(s) = G(s) 1+ G(s)H (s) 5 system response / step, sinusoid, etc. stability from denominator s charac. eqn. P, D, I action and effects disturbances steady state error