Pipeline Fatigue Assessment

Similar documents
PVP STATISTICAL APPROACH OF STRESS CONCENTRATION FACTOR (SCF) WITHIN PIPELINE GIRTH WELDS ECA

A damage-based condensation method to condense wave bins for tendon fatigue analysis

Fatigue Reliability and Calibration of Fatigue Design Factors for Offshore Wind Turbines

EN 8673 Subsea Pipeline Engineering Lecture 10 Winter 2009

Flexible Mechanical Elements

A USER-FRIENDLY TOOL FOR FATIGUE ASSESSMENT OF STEEL STRUCTURES ACCORDING TO EUROCODE 3

Volume 2 Fatigue Theory Reference Manual

ARTICLE A-8000 STRESSES IN PERFORATED FLAT PLATES

Experiment and Finite Analysis on Resonant Bending Fatigue of Marine Risers

Variation of Stress Range Due to Variation in Sea States An Overview of Simplified Method of Fatigue Analysis of Fixed Jacket Offshore Structure

TECHNICAL REPORT BALLTEC LTD. FINITE ELEMENT ANAYLSIS AND FATIGUE ASSESSMENT OF KN ANCHOR CONNECTOR REPORT NO REVISION NO.

Faculty of Science and Technology MASTER S THESIS. Author: Jeron Maheswaran

Stress Concentrations, Fatigue, Fracture

ScienceDirect. Fatigue life from sine-on-random excitations

Two Tier projects for students in ME 160 class

International Construction Consulting, LLC

Proceedings of the ASME 27th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering OMAE2008 June 15-20, 2008, Estoril, Portugal

Fatigue Modeling of Large Composite Wind Turbine Blades

Optimized PSD Envelope for Nonstationary Vibration Revision A

MAGNETIC FLUX LEAKAGE INVESTIGATION OF INTERACTING DEFECTS: COMPETITIVE EFFECTS OF STRESS CONCENTRATION AND MAGNETIC SHIELDING

Engineering Tripos Part IB. Part IB Paper 8: - ELECTIVE (2)

Rapid Earthquake Loss Assessment: Stochastic Modelling and an Example of Cyclic Fatigue Damage from Christchurch, New Zealand

NAME: Given Formulae: Law of Cosines: Law of Sines:

Load Determination. Fatigue Life Predictions Infinite Life, Stress Life, Strain Life

Hydraulic Design Of Polyethylene Pipes

Task 1 - Material Testing of Bionax Pipe and Joints

The Experiment Study for Fatigue Strength of Bogie Frame of Beijing Subway Vehicle Under Overload Situation

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 80 (2015 )

APPENDIX H: HMLT FATIGUE LIFE EVALUATION. (Proposed Specification Appendix) H-1

TOWARDS A VALIDATED PIPELINE DENT INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT MODEL

Towards The. Design of Super Columns. Prof. AbdulQader Najmi

ME 323 Examination #2 April 11, 2018

411 Steel Couplings. 411 Steel Couplings--Standard Length Sleeves 1/2 thru 12 Steel Pipe Sizes. Sleeve Thk. X Lgth. In.

Solid Mechanics Homework Answers

IDE 110 Mechanics of Materials Spring 2006 Final Examination FOR GRADING ONLY

GOAL-BASED NEW SHIP CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS General principles for structural standards MSC 80/6/6

TMHL TMHL (Del I, teori; 1 p.) SOLUTION I. II.. III. Fig. 1.1

Numerical and experimental study of the fatigue of threaded pipe couplings

MIL-HDBK-5H 1 December 1998

This guide is made for non-experienced FEA users. It provides basic knowledge needed to start your fatigue calculations quickly.

For ASME Committee use only.

Stress-Strain Behavior

Problem d d d B C E D. 0.8d. Additional lecturebook examples 29 ME 323

Review of the Master SN Neuber Rule in the ASME Division 2 Rewrite Project

Frequency Based Fatigue

RECENT INNOVATIONS IN PIPELINE SEAM WELD INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT

Kul Aircraft Structural Design (4 cr) Fatigue Analyses

Fundamentals of Durability. Unrestricted Siemens AG 2013 All rights reserved. Siemens PLM Software

Unified Quiz M4 May 7, 2008 M - PORTION

Predicting Fatigue Life with ANSYS Workbench

Effect of Stress Concentration on Magnetic Flux Leakage Signals from Blind-Hole Defects in Stressed Pipeline Steel

Chapter 10 1" 2 4" 1 = MPa mm. 201 = kpsi (0.105) S sy = 0.45(278.7) = kpsi D = = in. C = D d = = 10.

Fatigue Sensitivity Analysis of Offshore Wind Turbine Structures

[5] Stress and Strain

Power output: 6 750kW=4500kW Location: Top of Taikoyama, Kyoto prefecture, Japan. Terrain condition: Complex mountainous area

Table 6, replace the Key with: Table 6, change SBX 151 for dimension G, from: 5.59 mm to 5.56 mm mm to mm

Fatigue estimation for beam structures using BS5400

Telecommunications Pipe

A Fixed Platform Topside Piping System Strength Analysis Under Dynamic Pigging/Slugging Loads

APPENDIX B ABBREVIATIONS, SYMBOLS AND CONVERSION FACTORS Abbreviations

Examination in Damage Mechanics and Life Analysis (TMHL61) LiTH Part 1

An Acoustic Emission Approach to Assess Remaining Useful Life of Aging Structures under Fatigue Loading

Load and Stress Spectrum Generation

NTNU Faculty of Engineering Science and Technology Department of Marine Technology TMR 4195 DESIGN OF OFFSHORE STRUCTURES

APPENDIX H CONVERSION FACTORS

OMAE OMAE INCORPORATING THE HIGHER HARMONICS IN VIV FATIGUE PREDICTIONS

NONLINEAR RANDOM DISPLACEMENT AND FATIGUE ESTIMATES USING PDF TRANSFORMATIONS

6.4 A cylindrical specimen of a titanium alloy having an elastic modulus of 107 GPa ( psi) and

Analysis of a Wave Energy Converter with a Particular Focus on the Effects of Power Take-Off Forces on the Structural Responses

National yams May Pet-B2, Nahiral Gas Engineering. 3 hours duration NOTES:

Fatigue Reliability and Effective Turbulence Models in Wind Farms

ASME SECTION III STRESS ANALYSIS OF A HEAT EXCHANGER TUBESHEET WITH A MISDRILLED HOLE AND IRREGULAR OR THIN LIGAMENTS

Appendix. A 1 Properties of areas.* *Symbols used are: A = area I = moment of inertia S = Section modulus

Gas Shale Hydraulic Fracturing, Enhancement. Ahmad Ghassemi

ASME 2013 IDETC/CIE 2013 Paper number: DETC A DESIGN ORIENTED RELIABILITY METHODOLOGY FOR FATIGUE LIFE UNDER STOCHASTIC LOADINGS

Fatigue Problems Solution

American Earthquake Joint System for Resistance to Earthquake-Induced Ground Deformation

Samantha Ramirez, MSE. Stress. The intensity of the internal force acting on a specific plane (area) passing through a point. F 2

Tensile Properties of Ag Alloy Clad Bi-2212 Round Wires

The 10 th international Energy Conference (IEC 2014)

Endurance Strength Pg 274

AMPLIFICATION OF GROUND STRAIN IN IRREGULAR SURFACE LAYERS DURING STRONG GROUND MOTION

CHAPTER 9 FAILURE PROBLEM SOLUTIONS

A Comparative Study on Fatigue Damage using a Wave Load Sequence Model

RESIDUAL CHARACTERISTIC OF BENDING MOMENT ON REPEATED FOLDING MOTION OF COATED PAPERBOARD CREASED BY ROUND-EDGE KNIFE

Analysis Handbook. Metal Fatigue. for Computer-Aided Engineering. Barkey. Yung-Li Lee. Practical Problem-Solving Techniques. Hong-Tae Kang. Mark E.

Fatigue Life Analysis of an Oil Injector of a Diesel Engine

STANDARD SAMPLE. Reduced section " Diameter. Diameter. 2" Gauge length. Radius

N = Shear stress / Shear strain

HIGHWALL STABILITY DUE TO GROUND VIBRATIONS FROM BLASTING. Dr. Kyle A. Perry Dr. Kot F. Unrug Kevin Harris Michael Raffaldi

Long term ageing of polypropylene foam. The results of testing performed after 18 years of exposure in a subsea environment

Reciprocal of the initial shear stiffness of the interface K si under initial loading; reciprocal of the initial tangent modulus E i of the soil

FEA A Guide to Good Practice. What to expect when you re expecting FEA A guide to good practice

A new Method to determine Stress Cycle Histograms of Structures under Gusty Wind Load

RELIABILITY OF BURIED PIPELINES WITH CORROSION DEFECTS UNDER VARYING BOUNDARY CONDITIONS

Structural Reliability Assessment of a 4MW Offshore Wind Turbine

Momentum Balances & Quadratic Equations

ASME V&V Authors: Marcus Gamino Samuel Abankwa Ricardo Silva Edwin Johnson Michael Fisher

Series 7500 Formed Metal Bellows Catalog 974C

Numerical methods of multiaxial fatigue life prediction for elastomers under variable amplitude loadings

Transcription:

Pipeline Fatigue Assessment The purpose of this MathCAD sheet is to calculate cumulative pipeline fatigue damage using the well defined 'rainflow counting' process. The algorithms herein use pipeline variable stresses (as consequence of internal pressure and temperature variations) and uses the Rainflow counting method to determine the stress cycle ranges and the number of cycles per stress range. This will then allow the prediction of pipeline fatigue life. The rainflow counting routine used herein is that which is taken from Downing, S. D. and Socie, D. F., 'Simple Rainflow Counting Algortihms', International Journal of Fatigue, Vol 4, No. 1, January 1982. Algorithm one (of Downing et al) was made use of in this sheet. The calculation is performed in three discrete steps as follows: 1. 2. Sorting of the data in order to start and end with a maximum peak, and filter for peaks and valleys. The sorting is a necessary pre-conditioning step. Rainflow cycle counting; the data are then rearranged and filtered to provide an array of cyclic and mean values for each cycle. In addition, the array is also set to contain the maximum cyclic and corresponding mean for the entire data array. The data can also be factored for wall losses on account of corrosion. Summary Details Name of Asset UKCS Pipeline Operator UKCS Operator Designation 36-Inch Main Oil Export Pipeline Assessment Case Description Rainflow Counting Method: Operating Hoop Stresses This sheet calculates the pipeline fatigue life based on operational pressures (hoop stresses) Units Definitions deg C K BBL 42 gal BBLD BBL day 1 SCF ft 3 SCFD SCF day 1 MMSCFD 1 6 SCFD SCM m 3 SCMD SCM day 1 Author: KL Consulting (UK) Limited Page 1 of 6 Date: 7/7/214

Pipeline Operating Pressure Data Input Pipeline Operating Pressure History DATA Pressures.xlsx Assign Time Record t r DATA s Assign Pressure Record P r DATA 1 psi Duration of Time Record n period max( t r ) Average Operating Pressure μ p mean( P r ) Standard Deviation Operating Press σ p stdev( P r ) Maximum Operating Pressure P max max( P r ) n period = 3.966 yr μ p = 245.284 psi σ p = 123.383 psi P max = 1.46 1 3 psi 1.5 1 3 Operating Pressure (psi) 1 1 3 5 1 2 3 4 Time (Years) Hoop Stress Data Pipeline Outside Diameter D s 36 in Nominal Wall Thickness t nom 18.1 mm Author: KL Consulting (UK) Limited Page 2 of 6 Date: 7/7/214

Cumulative Corrosion at COP (Estimated) C loss 5.5 mm Estimated Wall Thickness at COP t wall t nom C loss t wall = 12.6 mm Number of Data Points k length( P r ) Data Range j.. k 1 P rj D s Operational Hoop Stresses σ hj 2 t wall Operational Hoop Stress (MPa) 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 Time (Years) Material of Construction API 5L X52 Youngs Modulus E 27 GPa Average Hoop Stress (Normal Operating) μ h mean( σ h ) μ h = 61.365 MPa Lambda (Eqn D.8-13 DNV-RP-C23) 12 μ h λ λ = 4.734 m 1 2 E t wall Length Parameter (in D.8-12 DNV-RP-C23) π D s l f 8 l f = 359.84 mm Author: KL Consulting (UK) Limited Page 3 of 6 Date: 7/7/214

Rainflow Counting of Time-Record and Fatigue Life Estimate The analysis below makes use of the above routines to calculate the range and mean stresses of the above time-record of data. These data may then be used with the material S-N data in order to calculate the fatigue life of the pipeline. Vector of Stresses σ σ h MPa Peak and Valley of Sorted Data y PVF( σ) Rainflow Counting y rfc RFC( y) Define Stress Range (MPa) S y rfc MPa 1 Define Mean Stress (MPa) S mean y rfc MPa S Define Maximum Stress (MPa) S max S mean + 2 ( ) Length of Column Vector b length S mean Define Range (for Matrix Values) n.. b 1 S-N Curve F1 (with Cathodic Protection) Intercept with Log N Axis loga 1 11.299 Characteristic Fatigue Strength Constant for LHS of Curve Inverse Slope of Left-Hand of Bi-linear Curve Inverse Slope of Right-Hand of Bi-linear Curve loga 1 a 1 1 m 1 3 m 2 5 No of Cycles Where Slope Change Occurs Stress Value at SN Curve Intersection N s 1 6 a 1 log N s m 1 S si 1 MPa SsI = 58.389 MPa Author: KL Consulting (UK) Limited Page 4 of 6 Date: 7/7/214

Characteristic Fatigue Strength Constant for RHS of Curve Girth Weld Joint Misalignment (for Calculation of SCF) S si logn s m 2 log + MPa a 2 1 a 2 = 6.787 1 14 ( ) δ m min.15 t nom, 3 mm δ m = 2.715 mm Out of Roundness (Maximum per DNV-OS-F11) D max D min δ OOR_max = D.3 Out of Roundness (for Calculation of SCF) Stress Concentration due to Joint Misalignment (See 2.1.1 DNV-RP-C23) Stress Concentration due to Out-of-Roundness (See D.8-12 DNV-RP-C23) δ OOR D s.3 δ OOR = 27.432 mm 3 δ m t nom SCF circ 1 + exp SCF t nom D circ = 1.391 s 1.5 δ OOR SCF OOR 1 + tanh( λ l t nom λ l f ) SCF OOR = 2.251 f Select Stress Concentration Factor SCF a SCF circ Damage Due to a Single Stress Reversal for Stress Range 'x' (DNV S-N Curve) D( x) x SCF a m 1 MPa if x > S a si 1 x SCF a MPa a 2 m 2 otherwise Fatigue Damage Per Stress Range D fatn D S n Cumulative Fatigue Damage D cum D fatn D cum = 2.386 1 3 n Author: KL Consulting (UK) Limited Page 5 of 6 Date: 7/7/214

D cum Annual Fatigue Damage D ann D n ann = 6.2 1 4 yr 1 period Design Fatigue Factor DFF 6 1 Unfactored Fatigue Life Life unf D ann Life unf = 1.662 1 3 yr Life unf Factored Fatigue Life L f L DFF f = 277.17 yr DNV-OS-F11 Design Fatigue Factor (Section 5, Table 5-11) 15 Stress Range (MPa) 125 1 75 5 25 1 2 3 4 5 RFC Point 4 Mean Stress (MPa) 3 2 1 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 45 5 RFC Point Author: KL Consulting (UK) Limited Page 6 of 6 Date: 7/7/214