Computing Global Characters

Similar documents
Computing the Unitary Dual. Jeffrey Adams, David Vogan, Peter Trapa and Marc van Leeuwen

Lecture 5: Admissible Representations in the Atlas Framework

Primitive Ideals and Unitarity

Dirac Cohomology, Orbit Method and Unipotent Representations

SPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS

Endoscopic character relations for the metaplectic group

Gelfand Pairs and Invariant Distributions

0 A. ... A j GL nj (F q ), 1 j r

Discrete Series and Characters of the Component Group

Tempered endoscopy for real groups III: inversion of transfer and L-packet structure

ARCHIMEDEAN ASPECTS OF SIEGEL MODULAR FORMS OF DEGREE 2

ON THE MAXIMAL PRIMITIVE IDEAL CORRESPONDING TO THE MODEL NILPOTENT ORBIT

On elliptic factors in real endoscopic transfer I

1 Introduction. 2 Background. October 9, 2002

Fundamental Lemma and Hitchin Fibration

On Minuscule Representations and the Principal SL 2. Benedict H. Gross

Weyl Group Representations and Unitarity of Spherical Representations.

arxiv: v2 [math.rt] 8 Jun 2018

LECTURE 3: TENSORING WITH FINITE DIMENSIONAL MODULES IN CATEGORY O

Branching rules of unitary representations: Examples and applications to automorphic forms.

Highest-weight Theory: Verma Modules

Fourier Coefficients and Automorphic Discrete Spectrum of Classical Groups. Dihua Jiang University of Minnesota

IVAN LOSEV. Lemma 1.1. (λ) O. Proof. (λ) is generated by a single vector, v λ. We have the weight decomposition (λ) =

Representation Theory and Orbital Varieties. Thomas Pietraho Bowdoin College

Kazhdan s orthogonality conjecture for real reductive groups

The Contragredient. Spherical Unitary Dual for Complex Classical Groups

Duality for Nonlinear Simply Laced Groups

A Langlands classification for unitary representations

(E.-W. Zink, with A. Silberger)

A NOTE ON REAL ENDOSCOPIC TRANSFER AND PSEUDO-COEFFICIENTS

Spin norm: combinatorics and representations

Notes on the Hermitian Dual

THE CENTRALIZER OF K IN U(g) C(p) FOR THE GROUP SO e (4,1) Ana Prlić University of Zagreb, Croatia

A relative version of Kostant s theorem

Lecture 4: LS Cells, Twisted Induction, and Duality

TEMPERED ENDOSCOPY FOR REAL GROUPS III: INVERSION OF TRANSFER AND L-PACKET STRUCTURE

The Omega-Regular Unitary Dual of the Metaplectic Group of Rank 2

Geometric Structure and the Local Langlands Conjecture

Functoriality and the trace formula

A PIERI RULE FOR HERMITIAN SYMMETRIC PAIRS. Thomas J. Enright, Markus Hunziker and Nolan R. Wallach

On Cuspidal Spectrum of Classical Groups

STABILITY AND ENDOSCOPY: INFORMAL MOTIVATION. James Arthur University of Toronto

ALGEBRAIC GROUPS J. WARNER

A CHARACTERIZATION OF DYNKIN ELEMENTS

REPRESENTATION THEORY. WEEK 4

Representations Are Everywhere

UNITARY DUAL OF GL(n) AT ARCHIMEDEAN PLACES AND GLOBAL JACQUET-LANGLANDS CORRESPONDENCE

Parameters for Representations of Real Groups Atlas Workshop, July 2004 updated for Workshop, July 2005

Tempered Endoscopy for Real Groups II: spectral transfer factors

THE LOCAL LANGLANDS CONJECTURE. David A. Vogan, Jr.

CHARACTER SHEAVES ON UNIPOTENT GROUPS IN CHARACTERISTIC p > 0. Mitya Boyarchenko Vladimir Drinfeld. University of Chicago

CHARACTER SHEAVES ON UNIPOTENT GROUPS IN CHARACTERISTIC p > 0. Mitya Boyarchenko Vladimir Drinfeld. University of Chicago

Hermitian and Unitary Representations for Affine Hecke Algebras

C*-Algebras and Group Representations

The Langlands Classification and Irreducible Characters for Real Reductive Groups

Notes on Green functions

Invariant Distributions and Gelfand Pairs

Reducibility of generic unipotent standard modules

A partition of the set of enhanced Langlands parameters of a reductive p-adic group

Extended groups and representation theory

The Langlands Classification and Irreducible Characters for Real Reductive Groups JEFFREY ADAMS DAN BARBASCH DAVID A. VOGAN, JR.

Associated varieties for real reductive groups

SPHERICAL UNITARY DUAL FOR COMPLEX CLASSICAL GROUPS

A PROOF OF BOREL-WEIL-BOTT THEOREM

On the geometric Langlands duality

The Lusztig-Vogan Bijection in the Case of the Trivial Representation

Tempered spectral transfer in the twisted endoscopy of real groups

LECTURE 10: KAZHDAN-LUSZTIG BASIS AND CATEGORIES O

BRANCHING LAWS FOR SOME UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS OF SL(4,R)

Category O and its basic properties

THREE CASES AN EXAMPLE: THE ALTERNATING GROUP A 5

Local systems on nilpotent orbits and weighted Dynkin diagrams

On the non-semisimple contributions to Selberg zeta functions

16.2. Definition. Let N be the set of all nilpotent elements in g. Define N

Subsystems, Nilpotent Orbits, and Weyl Group Representations

Langlands parameters and finite-dimensional representations

RIMS. Ibukiyama Zhuravlev. B.Heim

Margulis Superrigidity I & II

About polynomiality of the Poisson semicentre for parabolic subalgebras

ON DEGENERATION OF THE SPECTRAL SEQUENCE FOR THE COMPOSITION OF ZUCKERMAN FUNCTORS

Finite Subgroups of Gl 2 (C) and Universal Deformation Rings

Multiplicity free actions of simple algebraic groups

Report on the Trace Formula

Results from MathSciNet: Mathematical Reviews on the Web c Copyright American Mathematical Society 1998

PART I: GEOMETRY OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS

Marko Tadić. Introduction Let F be a p-adic field. The normalized absolute value on F will be denoted by F. Denote by ν : GL(n, F ) R the character

On the singular elements of a semisimple Lie algebra and the generalized Amitsur-Levitski Theorem

Characters of the Negative Level Highest-Weight Modules for Affine Lie Algebras

Chow rings of Complex Algebraic Groups

RICHARDSON ORBITS FOR REAL CLASSICAL GROUPS PETER E. TRAPA Abstract. For classical real Lie groups, we compute the annihilators and associated varieti

CHAPTER 6. Representations of compact groups

Cuspidality and Hecke algebras for Langlands parameters

Math 249B. Geometric Bruhat decomposition

Intersection of stable and unstable manifolds for invariant Morse functions

Classification of Discrete Series by Minimal K type

BIRTHING OPERS SAM RASKIN

Whittaker models and Fourier coeffi cients of automorphic forms

Discrete Series Representations of Unipotent p-adic Groups

A GEOMETRIC JACQUET FUNCTOR

Jacquet modules and induced representations

Transcription:

Computing Global Characters www.liegroups.org/papers

Computing Global Characters www.liegroups.org/papers π: irreducible admissible representation of G

Computing Global Characters www.liegroups.org/papers π: irreducible admissible representation of G Problem: Compute the (distribution) character θ π of π

Computing Global Characters www.liegroups.org/papers π: irreducible admissible representation of G Problem: Compute the (distribution) character θ π of π Harish-Chandra: function on the regular semisimple set

Computing Global Characters www.liegroups.org/papers π: irreducible admissible representation of G Problem: Compute the (distribution) character θ π of π Harish-Chandra: function on the regular semisimple set Roughly: fix H, θ π (g) = a(π,w)e wλ (g) (g)

Computing Global Characters www.liegroups.org/papers π: irreducible admissible representation of G Problem: Compute the (distribution) character θ π of π Harish-Chandra: function on the regular semisimple set Roughly: fix H, θ π (g) = a(π,w)e wλ (g) (g) Problem: Compute a(π, w)

Why?

θ π determines π Why?

Why? θ π determines π - e.g., how do you tell when two representations are isomorphic?

Why? θ π determines π - e.g., how do you tell when two representations are isomorphic? Applications: the Langlands program, lifting, base change,...

Why? θ π determines π - e.g., how do you tell when two representations are isomorphic? Applications: the Langlands program, lifting, base change,... Stability Application: Given a unipotent Arthur paramter Ψ, compute the Arthur packet Π ψ.

Why? θ π determines π - e.g., how do you tell when two representations are isomorphic? Applications: the Langlands program, lifting, base change,... Stability Application: Given a unipotent Arthur paramter Ψ, compute the Arthur packet Π ψ. Need to compute: AV(π) (a set of real nilpotent orbits)

Why? θ π determines π - e.g., how do you tell when two representations are isomorphic? Applications: the Langlands program, lifting, base change,... Stability Application: Given a unipotent Arthur paramter Ψ, compute the Arthur packet Π ψ. Need to compute: AV(π) (a set of real nilpotent orbits) (not just AV(Ann(π)) (a single complex nilpotent orbit))

Why? θ π determines π - e.g., how do you tell when two representations are isomorphic? Applications: the Langlands program, lifting, base change,... Stability Application: Given a unipotent Arthur paramter Ψ, compute the Arthur packet Π ψ. Need to compute: AV(π) (a set of real nilpotent orbits) (not just AV(Ann(π)) (a single complex nilpotent orbit)) Not known...

Why? θ π determines π - e.g., how do you tell when two representations are isomorphic? Applications: the Langlands program, lifting, base change,... Stability Application: Given a unipotent Arthur paramter Ψ, compute the Arthur packet Π ψ. Need to compute: AV(π) (a set of real nilpotent orbits) (not just AV(Ann(π)) (a single complex nilpotent orbit)) Not known... use character theory to get some information (see www.liegroups.org/tables/unipotent)

Theme: When can you encapsulate very complicated objects with surprisingly little data?

Theme: When can you encapsulate very complicated objects with surprisingly little data? Example: Reductive groups of rank m, and semisimple rank n:

Theme: When can you encapsulate very complicated objects with surprisingly little data? Example: Reductive groups of rank m, and semisimple rank n: pair of m n integral matrices (A,B)

Theme: When can you encapsulate very complicated objects with surprisingly little data? Example: Reductive groups of rank m, and semisimple rank n: pair of m n integral matrices (A,B) such that A B t is a Cartan matrix

Theme: When can you encapsulate very complicated objects with surprisingly little data? Example: Reductive groups of rank m, and semisimple rank n: pair of m n integral matrices (A,B) such that A B t is a Cartan matrix (A,B) (g t A,Bg 1 ) for g GL(m,Z)

Example: Here is complete information about representations of SL(2, R), including their characters. block: block 0(0,1): 0 [i1] 1 (2,*) 0 e 1(1,1): 0 [i1] 0 (2,*) 0 e 2(2,0): 1 [r1] 2 (0,1) 1 1 block: klbasis 0: 0: 1 1: 1: 1 2: 0: 1 1: 1 2: 1 5 nonzero polynomials, and 0 zero polynomials, at 5 Bruhat-comparable pairs.

History Inducted character formula, focus on the discrete series

History Inducted character formula, focus on the discrete series Harish-Chandra: compact Cartan subgroup T, Λ character of T ρ (later)

History Inducted character formula, focus on the discrete series Harish-Chandra: compact Cartan subgroup T, Λ character of T ρ (later) D( g) = (1 e α (g))e ρ ( g)

History Inducted character formula, focus on the discrete series Harish-Chandra: compact Cartan subgroup T, Λ character of T ρ (later) D( g) = (1 e α (g))e ρ ( g) unique irreducible representation π = π(λ) satisfying: sgn(w)(wλ)( g) θ π (g) = D( g) Question: Formula for θ π on other Cartans?

History Inducted character formula, focus on the discrete series Harish-Chandra: compact Cartan subgroup T, Λ character of T ρ (later) D( g) = (1 e α (g))e ρ ( g) unique irreducible representation π = π(λ) satisfying: sgn(w)(wλ)( g) θ π (g) = D( g) Question: Formula for θ π on other Cartans? notoriously difficult

History Inducted character formula, focus on the discrete series Harish-Chandra: compact Cartan subgroup T, Λ character of T ρ (later) D( g) = (1 e α (g))e ρ ( g) unique irreducible representation π = π(λ) satisfying: sgn(w)(wλ)( g) θ π (g) = D( g) Question: Formula for θ π on other Cartans? notoriously difficult Herb:

History Inducted character formula, focus on the discrete series Harish-Chandra: compact Cartan subgroup T, Λ character of T ρ (later) D( g) = (1 e α (g))e ρ ( g) unique irreducible representation π = π(λ) satisfying: sgn(w)(wλ)( g) θ π (g) = D( g) Question: Formula for θ π on other Cartans? notoriously difficult Herb: (1) Stable sums of discrete series (two-structures)

History Inducted character formula, focus on the discrete series Harish-Chandra: compact Cartan subgroup T, Λ character of T ρ (later) D( g) = (1 e α (g))e ρ ( g) unique irreducible representation π = π(λ) satisfying: sgn(w)(wλ)( g) θ π (g) = D( g) Question: Formula for θ π on other Cartans? notoriously difficult Herb: (1) Stable sums of discrete series (two-structures) (2) Endoscopy

History Inducted character formula, focus on the discrete series Harish-Chandra: compact Cartan subgroup T, Λ character of T ρ (later) D( g) = (1 e α (g))e ρ ( g) unique irreducible representation π = π(λ) satisfying: sgn(w)(wλ)( g) θ π (g) = D( g) Question: Formula for θ π on other Cartans? notoriously difficult Herb: (1) Stable sums of discrete series (two-structures) (2) Endoscopy Other approaches (Schmid, Goresky-Kottwitz-MacPherson, Zuckerman,...)

Alternative Approach: All representations at once, using KLV polynomials

Alternative Approach: All representations at once, using KLV polynomials (atlas software)

Alternative Approach: All representations at once, using KLV polynomials (atlas software) Assume regular infinitesimal character λ

Alternative Approach: All representations at once, using KLV polynomials (atlas software) Assume regular infinitesimal character λ Theorem: Π(G,λ) = {(H,Λ) Λ Ĥ(R) ρ,dλ λ}/g(r)

Alternative Approach: All representations at once, using KLV polynomials (atlas software) Assume regular infinitesimal character λ Theorem: (H,Λ) Π(G,λ) = {(H,Λ) Λ Ĥ(R) ρ,dλ λ}/g(r) { I(H, Λ) standard (induced) module π(h, Λ) irreducible Langlands quotient

Fix H, +,

Fix H, +,ρ = 1 2 + α,h ρ

Fix H, +,ρ = 1 2 + α,h ρ D( +, g) = (1 e α (g))e ρ ( g) ( g H(R) ρ )

Fix H, +,ρ = 1 2 + α,h ρ D( +, g) = (1 e α (g))e ρ ( g) ( g H(R) ρ ) H(R) + = {g H e α (g) > 1 (α real)}

Fix H, +,ρ = 1 2 + α,h ρ D( +, g) = (1 e α (g))e ρ ( g) ( g H(R) ρ ) H(R) + = {g H e α (g) > 1 (α real)} θ π (h) = a(π, +,Λ)Λ( g) D( +, g) (g H(R) + )

Fix H, +,ρ = 1 2 + α,h ρ D( +, g) = (1 e α (g))e ρ ( g) ( g H(R) ρ ) H(R) + = {g H e α (g) > 1 (α real)} θ π (h) = a(π, +,Λ)Λ( g) D( +, g) (g H(R) + ) (drop + )

Harish-Chandra s character formula for discrete series + induced character formula :

Harish-Chandra s character formula for discrete series + induced character formula : Proposition: Formula for θ I(H,Λ) on H(R): W θ I(H,Λ) (h) = R sgn(w)(wλ)(h) (h H(R) + ) D(h) W R = W(G(R),H(R)) W(G,H)

Harish-Chandra s character formula for discrete series + induced character formula : Proposition: Formula for θ I(H,Λ) on H(R): W θ I(H,Λ) (h) = R sgn(w)(wλ)(h) (h H(R) + ) D(h) W R = W(G(R),H(R)) W(G,H) Sue me:

Harish-Chandra s character formula for discrete series + induced character formula : Proposition: Formula for θ I(H,Λ) on H(R): W θ I(H,Λ) (h) = R sgn(w)(wλ)(h) (h H(R) + ) D(h) W R = W(G(R),H(R)) W(G,H) Sue me: I m surpressing an irksome sign

Harish-Chandra s character formula for discrete series + induced character formula : Proposition: Formula for θ I(H,Λ) on H(R): W θ I(H,Λ) (h) = R sgn(w)(wλ)(h) (h H(R) + ) D(h) W R = W(G(R),H(R)) W(G,H) Sue me: I m surpressing an irksome sign Corollary: Γ Ĥ(R) ρ: a(i(h,λ),γ) = { ±1 Γ = wλ 0 otherwise

Question: Formula for θ I(H,Λ) on other Cartan subgroups?

Question: Formula for θ I(H,Λ) on other Cartan subgroups? Theory of leading terms (growth of matrix coefficients):

Question: Formula for θ I(H,Λ) on other Cartan subgroups? Theory of leading terms (growth of matrix coefficients): If (*) Re dλ,α 0 for all α + then Λ occurs in I(H,Λ) and the character formula for no other standard module:

Question: Formula for θ I(H,Λ) on other Cartan subgroups? Theory of leading terms (growth of matrix coefficients): If (*) Re dλ,α 0 for all α + then Λ occurs in I(H,Λ) and the character formula for no other standard module: Theorem: Fix (H, Λ) satisfying (*): { a(i(h,λ ±1 (H,Λ) (H,Λ ) ),Λ) = 0 otherwise

{π(h,λ)} and {I(H,Λ)} are both bases of the Grothendieck group

{π(h,λ)} and {I(H,Λ)} are both bases of the Grothendieck group I = m(i,π)i

{π(h,λ)} and {I(H,Λ)} are both bases of the Grothendieck group I = m(i,π)i(multiplicity formula)

{π(h,λ)} and {I(H,Λ)} are both bases of the Grothendieck group I = m(i,π)i(multiplicity formula) π = M(I,π)I (character formula)

{π(h,λ)} and {I(H,Λ)} are both bases of the Grothendieck group I = m(i,π)i(multiplicity formula) π = M(I,π)I (character formula) This is precisely what is computed by the Kazhdan-Lustig-Vogan polynomials (the klbasis command)

Corollary: Assuming (*), a(π,λ) = ±M(I(H,Λ),π)

Corollary: Assuming (*), a(π,λ) = ±M(I(H,Λ),π) = ±P I,π (1) (KLV polynomial)

Corollary: Assuming (*), a(π,λ) = ±M(I(H,Λ),π) = ±P I,π (1) (KLV polynomial) General Λ: use coherent continuation (wgraph command)

Corollary: Assuming (*), a(π,λ) = ±M(I(H,Λ),π) = ±P I,π (1) (KLV polynomial) General Λ: use coherent continuation (wgraph command) a(π,w Λ) = ±M(I(H,Λ),w 1 π)

Corollary: Assuming (*), a(π,λ) = ±M(I(H,Λ),π) = ±P I,π (1) (KLV polynomial) General Λ: use coherent continuation (wgraph command) a(π,w Λ) = ±M(I(H,Λ),w 1 π) Conclusion: KLV-polynomials explicit formulas for all a(π, Λ)

Example: Sp(4, R) 0( 0,6): 0 [i1,i1] 1 2 ( 4, *) ( 5, *) 0 e 1( 1,6): 0 [i1,i1] 0 3 ( 4, *) ( 6, *) 0 e 2( 2,6): 0 [ic,i1] 2 0 ( *, *) ( 5, *) 0 e 3( 3,6): 0 [ic,i1] 3 1 ( *, *) ( 6, *) 0 e 4( 4,5): 1 [r1,c+] 4 9 ( 0, 1) ( *, *) 1 1 5( 5,4): 1 [C+,r1] 7 5 ( *, *) ( 0, 2) 2 2 6( 6,4): 1 [C+,r1] 8 6 ( *, *) ( 1, 3) 2 2 7( 7,3): 2 [C-,i1] 5 8 ( *, *) (10, *) 2 1,2,1 8( 8,3): 2 [C-,i1] 6 7 ( *, *) (10, *) 2 1,2,1 9( 9,2): 2 [i2,c-] 9 4 (10,11) ( *, *) 1 2,1,2 10(10,0): 3 [r2,r1] 11 10 ( 9, *) ( 7, 8) 3 2,1,2,1 11(10,1): 3 [r2,rn] 10 11 ( 9, *) ( *, *) 3 2,1,2,1

0: 0: 1 9: 0: 1 1: 1 1: 1: 1 2: 1 3: 1 2: 2: 1 4: 1 5: 1 3: 3: 1 6: 1 9: 1 4: 0: 1 1: 1 10: 0: 1 4: 1 1: 1 2: 1 5: 0: 1 3: 1 2: 1 4: 1 5: 1 5: 1 6: 1 6: 1: 1 7: 1 3: 1 8: 1 6: 1 9: 1 10: 1 7: 0: 1 1: 1 11: 2: q 2: 1 3: q 4: 1 9: 1 5: 1 11: 1 7: 1 8: 0: 1 1: 1 3: 1 4: 1 6: 1 8: 1

R R : Irreducible Modules π (2,1) (1, 2) (2, 1) ( 1, 2) (1, 2) ( 2, 1) ( 1, 2) ( 2, 1) π(0) 1,1 1,0 0,1 π(1) 1,1 1,0 0,1 π(2) 1, 0 1, 0 π(3) 1, 0 1, 0 π(4) 1,1-1,-1-1,1 1,-1 π(5) 1,0-1,0-1,0 1,0 π(6) 1,0-1,0-1,0 1,0 π(7) 1,0-1,0-1,0 1,0 1,0-1,0 π(8) 1,0-1,0-1,0 1,0 1,0-1,0 π(9) 1,1-1,-1-1,1 2,0 1,-1-2,0 π(10) 1,0-1,0-1,0 1,0 1,0-1,0-1,0 1,0 π(11) 0,1 0,-1 0,1 1,0 0,-1-1,0-1,0 1,0