Multiplicative geometric structures

Similar documents
Lie theory of multiplicative structures.

Quasi-Poisson structures as Dirac structures

Poisson Lie 2-groups and Lie 2-bialgebras

THE MODULAR CLASS OF A LIE ALGEBROID COMORPHISM

Representing Representations up to Homotopy

Atiyah classes and homotopy algebras

On the Van Est homomorphism for Lie groupoids

De Lecomte Roger à Monge Ampère From Lecomte Roger to Monge Ampère

Dirac structures. Henrique Bursztyn, IMPA. Geometry, mechanics and dynamics: the legacy of J. Marsden Fields Institute, July 2012

INTEGRATION OF TWISTED POISSON STRUCTURES ALBERTO S. CATTANEO AND PING XU

LIE ALGEBROIDS AND POISSON GEOMETRY, OLIVETTI SEMINAR NOTES

The Lie bialgebroid of a Poisson-Nijenhuis manifold. Yvette Kosmann-Schwarzbach

Integrating exact Courant Algebroids

EXERCISES IN POISSON GEOMETRY

Lie groupoids, cyclic homology and index theory

VB-groupoids cocycles and their applications to multiplicative structures

T. DRUMMOND, M. JOTZ LEAN, AND C. ORTIZ

Lie groupoids and Lie algebroids

MODULAR VECTOR FIELDS AND BATALIN-VILKOVISKY ALGEBRAS

A Note on Poisson Symmetric Spaces

On the holonomy fibration

Integrability and Associativity

Archivum Mathematicum

Geometrical mechanics on algebroids

PING XU. Research Statement

Homotopy Lie Algebroids

Contact manifolds and generalized complex structures

Geometric structures and Pfaffian groupoids Pure and Applied Differential Geometry - Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

Geometric structures and Pfaffian groupoids Pure and Applied Differential Geometry - Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

Symplectic and Poisson Manifolds

Dynamical systems on Leibniz algebroids

A RESULT ON NIJENHUIS OPERATOR

Constant symplectic 2-groupoids

a p-multivector eld (or simply a vector eld for p = 1) and a section 2 p (M) a p-dierential form (a Pfa form for p = 1). By convention, for p = 0, we

Geometric structures and Pfaffian groupoids Geometry and Algebra of PDEs - Universitetet i Tromsø

Doubled Aspects of Vaisman Algebroid and Gauge Symmetry in Double Field Theory arxiv: v1 [hep-th] 15 Jan 2019

arxiv: v2 [math.dg] 6 Aug 2018

arxiv: v3 [math.sg] 4 Aug 2016

THE MOMENTUM MAP IN POISSON GEOMETRY

Q-ALGEBROIDS AND THEIR COHOMOLOGY. Rajan Amit Mehta

Generalized Contact Structures

arxiv:math/ v2 [math.qa] 21 Nov 2002

UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ Luiz Henrique Pereira Pêgas THE HOCHSCHILD-KOSTANT-ROSENBERG THEOREM FOR SMOOTH MANIFOLDS. Curitiba, 2010.

INTEGRABILITY OF POISSON BRACKETS arxiv:math/ v2 [math.dg] 23 Dec 2003

Generalized complex geometry and topological sigma-models

Poisson CIRM, juin Organisateurs : Jean-Paul Dufour et Yvette Kosmann-Schwarzbach

Generalized complex geometry

POISSON-LIE T-DUALITY AND INTEGRABLE SYSTEMS

The best-known Poisson bracket is perhaps the one defined on the function space of R 2n by: p i. q i

Timothy E. Goldberg 1. INTRODUCTION

Deformations of coisotropic submanifolds in symplectic geometry

In this short note we prove that any Dirac structure can be realized as the push-forward of a presymplectic form via a

The symplectic structure on moduli space (in memory of Andreas Floer)

HAMILTONIAN ACTIONS IN GENERALIZED COMPLEX GEOMETRY

Locally conformal Dirac structures and infinitesimal automorphisms

Lectures on Poisson groupoids

ANNALESDEL INSTITUTFOURIER

R-flux string sigma model and algebroid duality on Lie 3-algebroids

Hamilton-Jacobi theory on Lie algebroids: Applications to nonholonomic mechanics. Manuel de León Institute of Mathematical Sciences CSIC, Spain

arxiv:math.dg/ v2 24 Oct 2002

Nigel Hitchin (Oxford) Poisson 2012 Utrecht. August 2nd 2012

Generalized almost paracontact structures

September 2011 at Varna

A NEW PROOF OF THE EXISTENCE OF HIERARCHIES OF POISSON NIJENHUIS STRUCTURES *

CARTAN HOMOTOPY FORMULAS AND THE GAUSS-MANIN CONNECTION IN CYCLIC HOMOLOGY. Ezra Getzler Department of Mathematics, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

Workshop on higher structures December 2016

Twisted Poisson manifolds and their almost symplectically complete isotropic realizations

From momentum maps and dual pairs to symplectic and Poisson groupoids

Lie bialgebras real Cohomology

arxiv: v1 [math.dg] 3 Jan 2009

A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO DIRAC MANIFOLDS

Chern characters via connections up to homotopy. Marius Crainic. Department of Mathematics, Utrecht University, The Netherlands

NAMBU-LIE GROUP ACTIONS. 1. Introduction

Poisson Manifolds Bihamiltonian Manifolds Bihamiltonian systems as Integrable systems Bihamiltonian structure as tool to find solutions

SYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS, GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION, AND UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS OF LIE GROUPS. 1. Introduction

The modular class of a twisted Poisson structure

Eva Miranda. UPC-Barcelona. (joint with Victor Guillemin and Ana Rita Pires) Zaragoza, February

Homotopy BV algebras, Courant algebroids and String Field Theory

arxiv: v2 [math.cv] 2 Sep 2010

Generalized complex structures on complex 2-tori

THE MAPPING CLASS GROUP ACTS REDUCIBLY ON SU(n)-CHARACTER VARIETIES

INTEGRATING THE NONINTEGRABLE. Alan WEINSTEIN Department of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley, USA

Reduction of Symplectic Lie Algebroids by a Lie Subalgebroid and a Symmetry Lie Group

On the Geometry of Multi-Dirac Structures and Gerstenhaber Algebras

Pfaffian groupoids Lie-Prolongations Spencer Operators Compatible S.O. Maurer-Cartan. Pfaffian groupoids. María Amelia Salazar.

arxiv: v1 [math.qa] 23 Jul 2016

Complexes of Hilbert C -modules

MANIN PAIRS AND MOMENT MAPS

Enveloping algebras of double Poisson-Ore extensions

A lecture on Jacobi manifolds 1

1 Hochschild Cohomology and A : Jeff Hicks

PhD-FSTC The Faculty of Sciences, Technology and Communication DISSERTATION. Defense held on 13/12/2016 in Luxembourg. to obtain the degree of

arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 15 Dec 2016

DIRAC STRUCTURES FROM LIE INTEGRABILITY

COHOMOLOGY OF ARITHMETIC GROUPS AND EISENSTEIN SERIES: AN INTRODUCTION, II

Lie algebroid modules and representations up to homotopy

Quasi, twisted, and all that... in Poisson geometry and Lie algebroid theory

Past Research Sarah Witherspoon

E-Courant Algebroids

SYMPLECTIC LEAVES AND DEFORMATION QUANTIZATION

Transcription:

Multiplicative geometric structures Henrique Bursztyn, IMPA (joint with Thiago Drummond, UFRJ) Workshop on EDS and Lie theory Fields Institute, December 2013

Outline: 1. Motivation: geometry on Lie groupoids 2. Multiplicative structures 3. Infinitesimal/global correspondence 4. Examples and applications

1. Motivation Lie groupoids are often equipped with compatible geometry...

1. Motivation Lie groupoids are often equipped with compatible geometry... functions: f C (G), f (gh) = f (g) + f (h) (1-cocycles)

1. Motivation Lie groupoids are often equipped with compatible geometry... functions: f C (G), f (gh) = f (g) + f (h) (1-cocycles) Vector fields: infinitesimal automorphisms (X gh = l g (X h ) + r h (X g ))

1. Motivation Lie groupoids are often equipped with compatible geometry... functions: f C (G), f (gh) = f (g) + f (h) (1-cocycles) Vector fields: infinitesimal automorphisms (X gh = l g (X h ) + r h (X g )) Poisson-Lie groups: m : G G G Poisson map.

1. Motivation Lie groupoids are often equipped with compatible geometry... functions: f C (G), f (gh) = f (g) + f (h) (1-cocycles) Vector fields: infinitesimal automorphisms (X gh = l g (X h ) + r h (X g )) Poisson-Lie groups: m : G G G Poisson map. Symplectic groupoids: graph(m) G G G Lagrangian submf.

1. Motivation Lie groupoids are often equipped with compatible geometry... functions: f C (G), f (gh) = f (g) + f (h) (1-cocycles) Vector fields: infinitesimal automorphisms (X gh = l g (X h ) + r h (X g )) Poisson-Lie groups: m : G G G Poisson map. Symplectic groupoids: graph(m) G G G Lagrangian submf. Differential forms: ω = p1 ω m ω + p2 ω = 0.

1. Motivation Lie groupoids are often equipped with compatible geometry... functions: f C (G), f (gh) = f (g) + f (h) (1-cocycles) Vector fields: infinitesimal automorphisms (X gh = l g (X h ) + r h (X g )) Poisson-Lie groups: m : G G G Poisson map. Symplectic groupoids: graph(m) G G G Lagrangian submf. Differential forms: ω = p1 ω m ω + p2 ω = 0. Complex Lie groups: m : G G G holomorphic map.

1. Motivation Lie groupoids are often equipped with compatible geometry... functions: f C (G), f (gh) = f (g) + f (h) (1-cocycles) Vector fields: infinitesimal automorphisms (X gh = l g (X h ) + r h (X g )) Poisson-Lie groups: m : G G G Poisson map. Symplectic groupoids: graph(m) G G G Lagrangian submf. Differential forms: ω = p1 ω m ω + p2 ω = 0. Complex Lie groups: m : G G G holomorphic map. Contact structures, distributions, projections (e.g. connections)...

1. Motivation Lie groupoids are often equipped with compatible geometry... functions: f C (G), f (gh) = f (g) + f (h) (1-cocycles) Vector fields: infinitesimal automorphisms (X gh = l g (X h ) + r h (X g )) Poisson-Lie groups: m : G G G Poisson map. Symplectic groupoids: graph(m) G G G Lagrangian submf. Differential forms: ω = p1 ω m ω + p2 ω = 0. Complex Lie groups: m : G G G holomorphic map. Contact structures, distributions, projections (e.g. connections)... Recurrent problem: infinitesimal counterparts, integration...

Some cases have been considered, through different methods...

Some cases have been considered, through different methods... [1] Crainic: Differentiable and algebroid cohomology, van Est isomorphisms, and characteristic classes, Comment. Math. Helv. (2003) [2] Drinfel d: Hamiltonian structures on Lie groups, Lie bialgebras and the geometric meaning of the classical Yang-Baxter equations. Soviet Math. Dokl. (1983). [3] Lu, Weinstein: Poisson Lie groups, dressing transformations, and Bruhat decompositions. J. Differential Geom. (1990). [4] Weinstein: Symplectic groupoids and Poisson manifolds. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (1987). [5] Mackenzie, Xu: Lie bialgebroids and Poisson groupoids. Duke Math. J. (1994), [6] Mackenzie, Xu: Integration of Lie bialgebroids. Topology (2000). [7] B., Crainic, Weinstein, Zhu: Integration of twisted Dirac brackets, Duke Math. J. (2004). [8] B., Cabrera: Multiplicative forms at the infinitesimal level. Math. Ann. (2012). [9] Crainic, Abad: The Weil algebra and Van Est isomorphism. Ann. Inst. Fourier (2011). [10] Laurent, Stienon, Xu: Integration of holomorphic Lie algebroids. Math.Ann. (2009). [11] Iglesias, Laurent, Xu: Universal lifting and quasi-poisson groupoids. JEMS (2012). [12] Crainic, Salazar, Struchiner: Multiplicative forms and Spencer operators.

2. Multiplicative tensors Consider G M, τ Γ( q T G p T G).

2. Multiplicative tensors Consider G M, τ Γ( q T G p T G). T G TM, T G A are Lie groupoids; also their direct sums.

2. Multiplicative tensors Consider G M, τ Γ( q T G p T G). T G TM, T G A are Lie groupoids; also their direct sums. Consider the Lie groupoid G = ( q T G) ( p T G) M = ( q A ) ( p TM).

2. Multiplicative tensors Consider G M, τ Γ( q T G p T G). T G TM, T G A are Lie groupoids; also their direct sums. Consider the Lie groupoid G = ( q T G) ( p T G) M = ( q A ) ( p TM). View τ Γ( q T G p T G) as function τ C (G): (α 1,..., α q, X 1,..., X p ) τ τ(α 1,..., α q, X 1,..., X p ).

2. Multiplicative tensors Consider G M, τ Γ( q T G p T G). T G TM, T G A are Lie groupoids; also their direct sums. Consider the Lie groupoid G = ( q T G) ( p T G) M = ( q A ) ( p TM). View τ Γ( q T G p T G) as function τ C (G): Definition: (α 1,..., α q, X 1,..., X p ) τ τ(α 1,..., α q, X 1,..., X p ). τ is multiplicative if τ C (G) is multiplicative. (1-cocycle)

Infinitesimal description?

Infinitesimal description? For functions: multiplicative f C (G) µ Γ(A ), d A µ = 0.

Infinitesimal description? For functions: multiplicative f C (G) µ Γ(A ), d A µ = 0. Given a Γ(A), L a r f = t (µ(a)).

Infinitesimal description? For functions: multiplicative f C (G) µ Γ(A ), d A µ = 0. Given a Γ(A), L a r f = t (µ(a)). For tensors τ Γ( q T G p T G), want µ : Γ(A) C (M), for a Γ(A). L a r τ = t ( µ(a)),

Infinitesimal description? For functions: multiplicative f C (G) µ Γ(A ), d A µ = 0. Given a Γ(A), L a r f = t (µ(a)). For tensors τ Γ( q T G p T G), want µ : Γ(A) C (M), for a Γ(A). L a r τ = t ( µ(a)), Enough to use particular types of sections a Γ(A)...

Key facts: Information about L a r τ encoded in L a r τ Γ( q T G p T G), i a r τ Γ( q T G p 1 T G), i t ατ Γ( q 1 T G p T G), for a Γ(A), α Ω 1 (M).

Key facts: Information about L a r τ encoded in L a r τ Γ( q T G p T G), i a r τ Γ( q T G p 1 T G), i t ατ Γ( q 1 T G p T G), for a Γ(A), α Ω 1 (M). The map t : C (M) C (G) restricts to Γ( q A p T M) Γ( q T G p T G), χ α χ r t α

As a result of L a r τ = t ( µ(a)), µ completely determined by

As a result of L a r τ = t ( µ(a)), µ completely determined by D : Γ(A) Γ( q A p T M), l : A q A p 1 T M, r : T M q 1 A p T M,

As a result of L a r τ = t ( µ(a)), µ completely determined by D : Γ(A) Γ( q A p T M), l : A q A p 1 T M, r : T M q 1 A p T M, such that L a r τ = t (D(a)), i a r τ = t (l(a)), i t ατ = t (r(α)). Leibniz-like condition: D(fa) = fd(a) + df l(a) a r(α)

As a result of L a r τ = t ( µ(a)), µ completely determined by D : Γ(A) Γ( q A p T M), l : A q A p 1 T M, r : T M q 1 A p T M, such that L a r τ = t (D(a)), i a r τ = t (l(a)), i t ατ = t (r(α)). Leibniz-like condition: D(fa) = fd(a) + df l(a) a r(α) We call (D, l, r) the infinitesimal components of τ.

As a result of L a r τ = t ( µ(a)), µ completely determined by D : Γ(A) Γ( q A p T M), l : A q A p 1 T M, r : T M q 1 A p T M, such that L a r τ = t (D(a)), i a r τ = t (l(a)), i t ατ = t (r(α)). Leibniz-like condition: D(fa) = fd(a) + df l(a) a r(α) We call (D, l, r) the infinitesimal components of τ. How about cocycle equations?

Cocycle equations for (D, r, l): (1) D([a, b]) = a.d(b) b.d(a) (2) l([a, b]) = a.l(b) i ρ(b) D(a) (3) r(l ρ(a) α) = a.r(α) + i ρ (α)d(a) (4) i ρ(a) l(b) = i ρ(b) l(a) (5) i ρ αr(β) = i ρ βr(α) (6) i ρ(a) r(α) = i ρ αl(a).

Cocycle equations for (D, r, l): (1) D([a, b]) = a.d(b) b.d(a) (2) l([a, b]) = a.l(b) i ρ(b) D(a) (3) r(l ρ(a) α) = a.r(α) + i ρ (α)d(a) (4) i ρ(a) l(b) = i ρ(b) l(a) (5) i ρ αr(β) = i ρ βr(α) (6) i ρ(a) r(α) = i ρ αl(a). Here Γ(A) acts on Γ( A T M) via a.(b α) = [a, b] α + b L ρ(a) α

Cocycle equations for (D, r, l): (1) D([a, b]) = a.d(b) b.d(a) (2) l([a, b]) = a.l(b) i ρ(b) D(a) (3) r(l ρ(a) α) = a.r(α) + i ρ (α)d(a) (4) i ρ(a) l(b) = i ρ(b) l(a) (5) i ρ αr(β) = i ρ βr(α) (6) i ρ(a) r(α) = i ρ αl(a). Here Γ(A) acts on Γ( A T M) via a.(b α) = [a, b] α + b L ρ(a) α (Redundancies...)

3. The infinitesimal/global correspondence Let G M be s.s.c., A M its Lie algebroid.

3. The infinitesimal/global correspondence Let G M be s.s.c., A M its Lie algebroid. Theorem: (B., Drummond) 1-1 correspondence between τ Γ( q T G p T G) multiplicative and (D, l, r), where D : Γ(A) Γ( q A p T M), l : A q A p 1 T M, r : T M q 1 A p T M, Leibniz-like condition,

3. The infinitesimal/global correspondence Let G M be s.s.c., A M its Lie algebroid. Theorem: (B., Drummond) 1-1 correspondence between τ Γ( q T G p T G) multiplicative and (D, l, r), where D : Γ(A) Γ( q A p T M), l : A q A p 1 T M, r : T M q 1 A p T M, Leibniz-like condition, satisfying (1) (6).

3. The infinitesimal/global correspondence Let G M be s.s.c., A M its Lie algebroid. Theorem: (B., Drummond) 1-1 correspondence between τ Γ( q T G p T G) multiplicative and (D, l, r), where D : Γ(A) Γ( q A p T M), l : A q A p 1 T M, r : T M q 1 A p T M, Leibniz-like condition, satisfying (1) (6). (more general tensors, coefficients in reps...)

(q, 0): multiplicative multivector fields

(q, 0): multiplicative multivector fields Infinitesimal components become: δ : Γ( A) Γ( +q 1 A), such that δ(ab) = δ(a)b + ( 1) a (q 1) aδ(b) δ([a, b]) = [δa, b] + ( 1) ( a 1)(q 1) [a, δb]

(q, 0): multiplicative multivector fields Infinitesimal components become: δ : Γ( A) Γ( +q 1 A), such that δ(ab) = δ(a)b + ( 1) a (q 1) aδ(b) δ([a, b]) = [δa, b] + ( 1) ( a 1)(q 1) [a, δb] (δ 0 = r, δ 1 = D)

(q, 0): multiplicative multivector fields Infinitesimal components become: δ : Γ( A) Γ( +q 1 A), such that δ(ab) = δ(a)b + ( 1) a (q 1) aδ(b) δ([a, b]) = [δa, b] + ( 1) ( a 1)(q 1) [a, δb] (δ 0 = r, δ 1 = D) E.g. (quasi-)poisson groupoids and (quasi-)lie bialgebroids...

(0, p): multiplicative differential forms

(0, p): multiplicative differential forms Infinitesimal components become: µ : A p 1 T M, ν : A p T M,

(0, p): multiplicative differential forms Infinitesimal components become: µ : A p 1 T M, ν : A p T M, such that i ρ(a) µ(b) = i ρ(b) µ(a), µ([a, b]) = L ρ(a) µ(b) i ρ(b) dµ(a) i ρ(b) ν(a), ν([a, b]) = L ρ(a) ν(b) i ρ(b) dν(a).

(0, p): multiplicative differential forms Infinitesimal components become: µ : A p 1 T M, ν : A p T M, such that i ρ(a) µ(b) = i ρ(b) µ(a), µ([a, b]) = L ρ(a) µ(b) i ρ(b) dµ(a) i ρ(b) ν(a), ν([a, b]) = L ρ(a) ν(b) i ρ(b) dν(a). (µ = l, ν = D dµ)

(0, p): multiplicative differential forms Infinitesimal components become: µ : A p 1 T M, ν : A p T M, such that i ρ(a) µ(b) = i ρ(b) µ(a), µ([a, b]) = L ρ(a) µ(b) i ρ(b) dµ(a) i ρ(b) ν(a), ν([a, b]) = L ρ(a) ν(b) i ρ(b) dν(a). (µ = l, ν = D dµ) E.g. symplectic groupoids and Poisson structures...

(1, p): vector-valued forms Ω(G, T G)

(1, p): vector-valued forms Ω(G, T G) Infinitesimal components become (D, τ A, τ M ), D : Ω (M, A) Ω +p (M, A), τ A : T M A +p 1 T M A, τ M Ω p (M, TM), plus compatibilities...

(1, p): vector-valued forms Ω(G, T G) Infinitesimal components become (D, τ A, τ M ), D : Ω (M, A) Ω +p (M, A), τ A : T M A +p 1 T M A, τ M Ω p (M, TM), plus compatibilities... (D 0 = D, (τ A ) 0 = l, τ M = r )

(1, p): vector-valued forms Ω(G, T G) Infinitesimal components become (D, τ A, τ M ), D : Ω (M, A) Ω +p (M, A), τ A : T M A +p 1 T M A, τ M Ω p (M, TM), plus compatibilities... (D 0 = D, (τ A ) 0 = l, τ M = r ) GLA relative to Frolicher-Nijenhuis bracket on multiplicative Ω (G, T G)...

Particular case p = 1: J : T G T G

Particular case p = 1: J : T G T G Components are (D, J A, J M ), J A : A A, J M : TM TM, D : Γ(A) Γ(T M A).

Particular case p = 1: J : T G T G Components are (D, J A, J M ), J A : A A, J M : TM TM, D : Γ(A) Γ(T M A). Can analyze 1 2 [J, J] = N J Ω 2 (G, T G) infinitesimally...

Particular case p = 1: J : T G T G Components are (D, J A, J M ), J A : A A, J M : TM TM, D : Γ(A) Γ(T M A). Can analyze 1 2 [J, J] = N J Ω 2 (G, T G) infinitesimally... E.g. holomorphic Lie groupoids holomorphic Lie algebroids... complex Lie group: Lie bracket complex bilinear

Particular case p = 1: J : T G T G Components are (D, J A, J M ), J A : A A, J M : TM TM, D : Γ(A) Γ(T M A). Can analyze 1 2 [J, J] = N J Ω 2 (G, T G) infinitesimally... E.g. holomorphic Lie groupoids holomorphic Lie algebroids... complex Lie group: Lie bracket complex bilinear holomorphic vector bundle: flat, partial T 10 -connection

Particular case p = 1: J : T G T G Components are (D, J A, J M ), J A : A A, J M : TM TM, D : Γ(A) Γ(T M A). Can analyze 1 2 [J, J] = N J Ω 2 (G, T G) infinitesimally... E.g. holomorphic Lie groupoids holomorphic Lie algebroids... complex Lie group: Lie bracket complex bilinear holomorphic vector bundle: flat, partial T 10 -connection more: holomorphic symplectic/poisson groupoids, almost product...

Thank you