HELIOSPHERIC RADIO EMISSIONS

Similar documents
W.R. Webber 1 and D.S. Intriligator 2

ICMES at very large distances

Measurements in Interstellar Space of Galactic Cosmic Ray Isotopes of. Li, Be, B and N, Ne Nuclei Between MeV/nuc by the

Voyager observations of galactic and anomalous cosmic rays in the helioshealth

Temporal and spectral variations of anomalous oxygen nuclei measured by Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 in the outer heliosphere

Correlation between energetic ion enhancements and heliospheric current sheet crossings in the outer heliosphere

The Voyager Journey to the Giant Planets and Interstellar Space

What Voyager cosmic ray data in the outer heliosphere tells us about 10 Be production in the Earth s polar atmosphere in the recent past

Anomalous cosmic rays in the distant heliosphere and the reversal of the Sun s magnetic polarity in Cycle 23

The Sun's Dynamic Influence on the Outer Heliosphere, the Heliosheath, and the Local Interstellar Medium

THE UNFOLDING OF THE SPECTRA OF LOW ENERGY GALACTIC COSMIC RAY H AND HE NUCLEI AS THE VOYAGER 1 SPACECRAFT EXITS THE REGION OF HELIOSPHERIC MODULATION

1. New Mexico State University, Department of Astronomy, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA

The Energetic Particle Populations of the Distant Heliosphere

Caltech, 2 Washington University, 3 Jet Propulsion Laboratory 4. Goddard Space Flight Center

Relation between the solar wind dynamic pressure at Voyager 2 and the energetic particle events at Voyager 1

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 114, A02103, doi: /2008ja013689, 2009

Effects of the solar wind termination shock and heliosheath on the heliospheric modulation of galactic and anomalous Helium

Interstellar Neutral Atoms and Their Journey Through the Heliosphere Elena Moise

THE G INDEX OF INTERPLANETARY SCINTILLATION DATA AND ITS RELATION TO FORBUSH DECREASES DURING and

Plasma properties at the Voyager 1 crossing of the heliopause

W.R. Webber 1 and P.R. Higbie New Mexico State University, Department of Astronomy, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA

A Study of the B/C Ratio Between 10 MeV/nuc and 1 TeV/nuc in. Cosmic Rays Using New Voyager and AMS-2 Data and a Comparison with

COSMIC-RAY ENERGY CHANGES IN THE HELIOSPHERE. II. THE EFFECT ON K-CAPTURE ELECTRON SECONDARIES

Interstellar and Interplanetary Material. HST Astrobiology Workshop: May 5-9, 2002 P.C. Frisch University of Chicago

arxiv: v1 [physics.space-ph] 12 Feb 2015

The Cosmic Ray Boron/Carbon Ratio Measured at Voyager and at AMS-2 from 10 MeV/nuc up to ~1 TeV/nuc and a Comparison With Propagation Calculations

W.R. Webber. New Mexico State University, Astronomy Department, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA

A Multi-ion Model of the Heliosphere with Secondary Charge Exchange

How are the present solar minimum conditions transmitted to the outer heliosphere and heliosheath? John Richardson M.I.T.

Pickup Proton Instabilities and Scattering in the Distant Solar Wind and the Outer Heliosheath: Hybrid Simulations

Multifractal Structures Detected by Voyager 1 at the Heliospheric Boundaries

Confronting Observations and Modeling: The Role of the Interstellar Magnetic Field in Voyager 1 and 2 Asymmetries

Transient shocks beyond the heliopause

Cosmic Rays in the Heliosphere. J. R. Jokipii University of Arizona

Solar wind termination shock and heliosheath effects on the modulation of protons and antiprotons

Space Physics: Recent Advances and Near-term Challenge. Chi Wang. National Space Science Center, CAS

Space Weather at 75 AU

Examination of the Last Large Solar Energetic Particle Events of Solar Cycle 23

W.R. Webber. New Mexico State University, Astronomy Department, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA

magnetic reconnection as the cause of cosmic ray excess from the heliospheric tail

THE OUTER HELIOSPHERE: SOLAR WIND, COSMIC RAY AND VLF RADIO EMISSION VARIATIONS

What do we know about the orientation of the Local Interstellar Magnetic Field?

Effect of CME Events of Geomagnetic Field at Indian Station Alibag and Pondicherry

What is New in the Outer Heliosphere?: Voyager and IBEX

Magnetic Effects Change Our View of the Heliosheath

particle acceleration in reconnection regions and cosmic ray excess from the heliotail

Cosmic-Ray Transport in the Heliosphere

Recent Particle Measurements from Voyagers 1 and 2

When will Voyager 1 and 2 cross the termination shock?

Science Questions from inside 150AU Heliosheath/Heliopause. Merav Opher Boston University

PLASMA FLOWS IN THE HELIOSHEATH ALONG THE VOYAGER 1 AND 2 TRAJECTORIES DUE TO EFFECTS OF THE 11 YR SOLAR CYCLE

W.R. Webber 1, N. Lal 2, E.C. Stone 3, A.C. Cummings 3 and B. Heikkila 2

Confronting Observations and Modeling: The Role of The Interstellar Magnetic Field in Voyager 1 and 2 Asymmetries

Pickup Ion Effect of the Solar Wind Interaction with the Local Interstellar Medium

GALACTIC COSMIC-RAY MODULATION USING A SOLAR MINIMUM MHD HELIOSPHERE: A STOCHASTIC PARTICLE APPROACH

Mesoscale Variations in the Heliospheric Magnetic Field and their Consequences in the Outer Heliosphere

A new mechanism to account for acceleration of the solar wind

L61 1. INTRODUCTION. The Astrophysical Journal, 591:L61 L65, 2003 July 1. Received 2003 January 8; accepted 2003 May 19; published 2003 June 9

Coronal Mass Ejections in the Heliosphere

Lags, hysteresis, and double peaks between cosmic rays and solar activity

THE INTERACTION OF TURBULENCE WITH THE HELIOSPHERIC SHOCK

Space Weather Effects of Coronal Mass Ejection

Survey of the Solar System. The Sun Giant Planets Terrestrial Planets Minor Planets Satellite/Ring Systems

Solar Magnetic Fields Jun 07 UA/NSO Summer School 1

A Time-dependent and Anisotropic Force Field Model For Galactic Cosmic Ray Flux

Interstellar Medium V1

Solar Wind Turbulent Heating by Interstellar Pickup Protons: 2-Component Model

The Solar Wind in the Outer Heliosphere

INTERPLANETARY ASPECTS OF SPACE WEATHER

Cosmic Rays in the Dynamic Heliosphere

In situ Investigations of the Local Interstellar Medium. Science Mission Technology, TRL

PROPAGATION AND EVOLUTION OF ICMES IN THE SOLAR WIND

ICRC Solar activity: minor ion enrichment, particle acceleration and transport, and extreme events

Probing the Edge of the Solar System: Formation of an Unstable Jet-Sheet

A NEW MODEL FOR REALISTIC 3-D SIMULATIONS OF SOLAR ENERGETIC PARTICLE EVENTS

Limitations of the force field equation to describe cosmic ray modulation

ESS 200C. Lectures 6 and 7 The Solar Wind

Heliophysics Shocks. Merav Opher, George Mason University,

Global structure of the out-of-ecliptic solar wind

Radial and Latitudinal Variations of the Energetic Particle Response to ICMEs

Modeling Secondary Neutral Helium in the Heliosphere

The Magnetic Field at the Inner Boundary of the Heliosphere Around Solar Minimum

Observations of an interplanetary slow shock associated with magnetic cloud boundary layer

Cosmic Rays - R. A. Mewaldt - California Institute of Technology

CME linear-fit. 3. Data and Analysis. 1. Abstract

Deformation of ICME and MC on 1 30 AU Seen by Voyager 2 and WIND

X (A.U.) Z (A.U.)

A first step towards proton flux forecasting

Voyager 2 was launched by NASA on. Voyager: Intergalactic Message In A Bottle. Carrying messages to ET from Earth on a gold record

Modern Multi-component Models of the Heliospheric Interface

Kinetic and Small Scale Solar Wind Physics

In-Situ Signatures of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections

Challenges to. Future Outer Heliosphere. and Interstellar Probes. Science. Mission. Technology,

Instrumentation for Interstellar Exploration

Heliospheric Structure: The Bow Wave and the Hydrogen Wall 1

EFFECT OF SOLAR AND INTERPLANETARY DISTURBANCES ON SPACE WEATHER

Dalla, Silvia, Marsh, Michael and Laitinen, Timo Lauri mikael

STRUCTURE ON INTERPLANETARY SHOCK FRONTS: TYPE II RADIO BURST SOURCE REGIONS

Radio Observations and Space Weather Research

Modeling Heliophysics Phenomena with Multi-Scale Fluid-Kinetic Simulation Suite

Transcription:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 TWO RECENT khz OUTER HELIOSPHERIC RADIO EMISSIONS SEEN AT VOYAGER 1 - WHAT ARE THE INTERPLANETARY EVENTS THAT TRIGGER THEM AND WHERE ARE THESE EVENTS WHEN THE RADIO EMISSIONS START? 11 12 13 14 15 W.R. Webber 1 and D.S. Intriligator 2 1. New Mexico State University, Department of Astronomy, Las Cruces, NM, 88003, USA 2. Carmel Research Center, Space Plasma Laboratory, Santa Monica, CA 90406, USA 16

2 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 ABSTRACT We have examined instigating events at the Sun that may be responsible for two of the most recent outer heliospheric khz emissions detected by the University of Iowa plasma wave detector on Voyager 1 starting at 2004.64 and 2006.39, respectively. These interplanetary events have been followed outward from the Sun using plasma and cosmic ray data from Ulysses and Voyagers 1 and 2. For both intervals of khz emissions, events originating near the Sun that turn out to be the most intense events in this 11-year solar cycle as observed by the plasma and cosmic ray variations in the outer heliosphere, reach V1 and V2 which are near the heliospheric termination shock at almost the same time that the two khz radio emissions turn-on. These two events which originate near the Sun about 2003.89 (the 2003 Halloween event) and at 2005.71, are also unusual in that they develop solar wind ram pressure waves in the outer heliosphere with maximum pressures ~6-8 times the average solar wind pressure when they reach the heliospheric termination shock. We believe that this study suggests a possible new paradigm for the origin of these latest khz emissions. This new paradigm is different from the current one describing earlier khz events. It is related to the strength of these pressure waves in the outer heliosphere and involves the arrival of these large pressure waves at the heliospheric termination shock rather than the arrival of a shock at the heliopause as is the current paradigm. 34

3 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 Introduction The khz radio emissions detected by the University of Iowa plasma wave detectors on the Voyager spacecraft have provided a remarkable insight into conditions in the outermost heliosphere. The present paradigm is that these emissions originate when a large shock reaches the outermost boundary of the heliosphere, the heliopause (HP). This interaction then triggers plasma waves in the local interstellar (IS) medium at frequencies just above the local plasma frequency (Gurnett, 1993). To date perhaps 6-10 of these radio events have been observed over three solar 11-year cycles. The first khz emission starting at 1983.84, and another starting at 1992.75 are by far the largest and best documented. The particular shocks and interplanetary disturbances that are believed to be the source of these khz emissions have their origin near the Sun. For the two earlier khz emissions noted above, using an identification near the Sun based on large cosmic ray decreases at the Earth, the travel times to the onset of the khz emission has been determined to be ~415 5 days. These times along with estimates of the speed profile of the shocks with distance from the Sun have allowed estimates of the HP distance in the range 120-160 AU and have served to define the scale size of the heliosphere (Gurnett, et al., 1993). In the most recent solar cycle #23 starting at 1997.5, there have been no really large khz radio emissions like those in cycles 21 and 22, but there have been several smaller ones (Gurnett, Kurth and Stone, 2003; Gurnett, 2007, see Figure 1). Voyagers 1 and 2 (V1 and V2) are now at much larger distances from the Sun; at 2005.0 these distances are ~95 and 76 AU, respectively. As a result they may be used to better determine the characteristics of these interplanetary (IP) shocks at large distances from the Sun as they pass V1 and V2, in some cases near to or beyond the heliospheric termination shock (HTS). From the timing of these shocks as they reach V1 and V2 one is also able to greatly reduce the timing uncertainties as these shocks propagate to the HTS and beyond. In this paper we examine two recent khz emissions reported by the Iowa group. The first had its onset at about 2004.64. The second had its onset at about 2006.39. These emissions are illustrated in Figure 1, provided to us by Gurnett, 2007. Neither of these radio events has been discussed in any detail in the literature although the onset times for the khz emission have been presented in figures discussed by Gurnett, 2007. 64 65

4 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 The Heliospheric khz Emissions with an Onset at 2004.64 These khz emissions have a possible origin near the Sun at the time of the well documented series of events collectively known as the "Halloween" 2003 events (Intriligator, et al., 2005) occurring at about 2003.83 at the Earth. As Gurnett, 2007, note, however, this timing would lead to a total travel time from the Earth to the onset of the khz radiation of only 0.81 years, much shorter than the travel time of ~1.15 years for the earlier large khz events in solar cycles 21 and 22. Let us consider the implications of the "Halloween" 2003 event at the Earth as the possible instigating event for these khz emissions. We have an onset time ~2003.83 at the Earth at which time an exceptionally strong shock was observed and also a Forbush decrease ~26% was seen by the Climax NM. Later at 2003.87 a solar wind speed jump of ~200 km. s -1 to >850 km. s -1 was observed in the plasma detector on Ulysses then at ~5 AU and ~4 N. At V2, then at 73.4 AU, a solar wind speed jump of ~100 km. s -1 to ~560 km. s -1 was observed in the plasma detector at 2004.33 (event #7 in Figure 2). This speed jump at V2 was considered to be due to the passage of the Halloween event beyond V2 (Richardson, et al., 2005). An increase of a factor ~4 was seen in 2-3 MeV protons peaking at 2004.31 and a decrease of >70 MeV particles 10% was also observed by CRS detectors on Voyager 2. These intensity changes have also been attributed to the arrival of the Halloween event at V2 (Webber, et al., 2007). This event, which was one of the largest in solar cycle 23 by all measures, near the Earth, at Ulysses and also in the outer heliosphere at V2, took ~0.50 years to travel from the Earth to V2 implying an average speed ~665 km. s -1 (Intriligator, et al., 2005). At V1 there is a decrease in the >70 MeV rate ~6% at 2004.59, followed by a further decrease ~5% starting at 2004.71. Collectively these decreases mark the arrival of this same shock at V1, then at 92.3 AU and just inside the HTS at 94 AU (Webber, et al., 2007). The time period for the arrival of the Halloween shock at V1 just inside the HTS therefore brackets the time of onset of the khz radio emission at 2004.64. So, in effect, the onset of the khz radio emission for this event coincides very closely with the arrival of the "Halloween" shock at the HTS and at V1 just 2 AU inside the HTS. The Heliospheric khz Radio Emission with an Onset at 2006.39 A potential candidate for the origin of this khz radio event is the intense solar activity observed in September, 2005. In September, 2005, there was a large Forbush decrease of cosmic

5 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 rays of amplitude ~15% seen by the Climax NM, with an onset on September 10th (2005.70). This event was also observed at Ulysses, now at 4.8 AU and -28 S, (in latitudinal alignment with V2) on about September 15th as a large plasma speed jump ~280 km. s -1 to >700 km. s -1. At V2, at 79.0 U, the largest solar wind speed jump yet observed in the outer heliosphere in this solar cycle, ~140 km. s -1 to a maximum solar wind speed of ~520 km. s -1 was observed. This occurred at 2006.17 (Richardson, et al., 2006) (event #10 in Figure 2) and the >70 MeV cosmic ray rate decreased by ~14% at 2006.21 about 0.20 years before the onset of the khz emission (Webber, et al., 2007; Intriligator, et al., 2005). Both the plasma and cosmic ray events at V2 have been ascribed to the September events at the Earth (Richardson, et al., 2006; Webber, et al., 2007). The travel time from the Earth to V2 of 0.48 year leads to an average speed ~760 km. s -1, the highest average speed observed for any event in the outer heliosphere. At V1 at 99.7 AU, and beyond the HTS, a decrease ~5-6% was seen in the >70 MeV rate by the CRS experiment at 2006.51 (Webber, et al., 2007) and is believed to mark the arrival of this event at V1. The onset of the khz radio emission at 2006.39 thus occurs between the arrival of this event at V2 at 79 AU inside the HTS and its arrival at V1 at 99.7 AU outside the HTS. This would again imply a turn-on associated with the shock arrival near the HTS, not the HP. Discussion: The Significance of Outward Propagating Pressure Waves The two khz radio emission intervals discussed here serve to emphasize an under appreciated problem of first identifying the correct instigating event on the Sun and then following it through the heliosphere using Ulysses, V2 and V1 data when possible to determine the time when it reaches a particular point in the heliosphere, for example, the HTS or HP, at which time the khz radio emission first turns on. The real basis for understanding the onset of these khz emissions thus becomes trying to understand what are the most important features of the instigating event that lead to the turn-on of the khz radiation in the 1st place. In this connection we would like to note the significance of large pressure waves that develop during the propagation of the largest IP shocks through the heliosphere (Figure 3). This figure shows the daily average solar wind ram pressures measured at V2 between 2001 and the time it crossed the HTS at 83.7 AU at 2007.66. The two largest pressure waves at V2 in solar cycle 23 occur at the times that the Halloween event and the September 2005 event pass V2. These pressure waves, with peak pressures ~5-10 times the average solar wind pressure, are known to directly and immediately influence the HTS, its

6 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 location and the structure of the heliosheath beyond the HTS, Webber, 2005; Richardson, et al., 2006 (see e.g., Washimi, et al., 2007, for an example of the effect of a pressure wave with ~1.5 times the average solar wind pressure impacting the HTS). Such large pressure waves impacting the HTS may provide the densities beyond the HTS required to produce the observed khz emission. Summary and Conclusions In this paper we have examined the possibilities for the instigating events on the Sun that are responsible for two of the most recent outer heliospheric khz radio emissions that began on 2004.64 and 2006.39 as observed by the Iowa plasma wave detector. In this study we utilize observations of the IP events as they pass V2 and V1 in the outer heliosphere between ~72 and 99 AU. For both of the khz emissions the particular instigating events that reach V1 and V2 which are near the HTS at the time of the turn-on the khz radiation are the two largest in the outer heliosphere in solar cycle 23, in terms of solar wind speed jump (~ shock strength), galactic cosmic ray decreases and magnetic field increase. These two events are also particularly significant for their solar wind ram pressure waves that reach daily average pressures ~6-8 times the normal average solar wind pressure for times ~26 days or more. We plan to further investigate the passage of these instigating events from the Sun to the HTS and HP as well as earlier events using three-dimensional solar wind models (Intriligator, et al., 2008). We, therefore, suggest that for these two most recent khz emissions, strong arguments from both the timing and shock strength point of view can be made for the onset of the radio emission to be coincident with the arrival of the instigating interplanetary disturbances at the HTS rather than the HP. Theories for the origin of this khz radiation in the Heliosheath (e.g., Zank, et al., 1994) need to be re-examined utilizing the much better current understanding of conditions there, following the latest V2 observations at the HTS and beyond. This study should include the effects of the large pressure waves that we identify in this paper and their encounter with the HTS, a topic only recently explored by Washimi, et al., 2007. We note that McNutt, et al., 1988, originally suggested that the onset of the heliospheric radio emissions might be due to the arrival of solar wind disturbances at a hypothesized heliospheric termination shock. Subsequent attempts to explain the radio emissions in terms of large changes in density either in the foreshock region or in the region just beyond the HTS have

7 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 had difficulties in explaining the radio emission at frequencies 2 khz (e.g., Cairns and Zank, 2001) leading eventually to the current paradigm developed earlier by Gurnett (1993) and coworkers involving the heliopause and the presumed higher (electron) densities present there. We should also note that there appear to be at least two types of radio emissions in the 2-5 khz range. One type drifts significantly to higher frequency as a function of time, the other remains at a nearly constant frequency from2.0-2.6 khz. The two events discussed here appear to be of the 1 st type whereas, for example, the two earlier giant khz events in 1981 and 1992, upon which the earlier theories were developed, are mainly the 2 nd type showing little drift. It could be, for example, that the two different types of khz events represent interactions of the outward moving solar disturbance near the HTS in one case and beyond the HP in the other. In any case what the new theories should be is unclear. Certainly the timing relationships of earlier khz radio emissions in solar cycles 21 and 22 need to be re-examined using the plasma and cosmic ray features of various possible instigating events including the development of these pressure pulses as the disturbance propagates outward in the heliosphere past V1 and V2. For example, the impact of these giant ram pressure pulses on the heliosheath beyond the HTS may lead to elevated heliosheath densities perhaps rivaling those found at the HP and beyond. Until such studies are completed it is not appropriate to claim that all khz emissions observed by Voyager, including those observed earlier in solar cycles 21 and 22, have their origin near the HTS. It may be that shocks arriving at both locations can produce the observed khz emission, depending on their specific characteristics and the details of their interaction with the HTS and HP, respectively. Acknowledgments: The authors express their appreciation to the MIT plasma experimenters and the Iowa plasma wave experimenters on Voyager for making their data available on their web-sites and for valuable discussions. The work at the Carmel Research Center was supported by NASA grant NNX08AE40G and by the Carmel Research Center. 184

8 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 References Cairns, I.H. and G.P. Zank, Turn-on of radiation beyond the heliosphere and its propagation into the inner heliosphere, The Outer Heliosphere: The Next Frontier, Editors K. Scherer, et al., Pergamum, 2001 Gurnett, D.A., W.S. Kurth, S.C. Allendorf and R.L. Poynter, Radio emission from the heliopause triggered by an interplanetary shock, Science, 262, 199-203, 1993 Gurnett, D.A., Heliospheric radio emissions, Space Sci. Rev., 72, 243-254, 1995 Gurnett, D.A., W.S. Kurth and E.C. Stone, The return of the heliospheric 2-3 khz radio emission during solar cycle 23, GRL, 30, Issue 23, pp. SSC 8-1, 2209, doi:10.1029/ 2003GL018514. Gurnett, D.A., Private Communications to W.R. Webber and D.S. Intriligator, 2007, 2008 Intriligator, D.S., W. Sun, M. Dryer, C. Fry, C. Deehr, and J. Intriligator, From the Sun to the outer heliosphere: Modeling and analyses of the interplanetary propagation of the October/November (Halloween) 2003 solar events, J. Geophys. Res., 110, A09S10, doi:10.1029/2004ja010939, 2005. Intriligator, D.S., W. Sun, A. Rees, T. Horbury, W.R. Webber, C. Deehr, T. Detman, M. Dryer, and J. Intriligator, Three-dimensional simulations of shock propagation in the heliosphere and beyond, in particle acceleration and transport in the heliosphere and beyond, 7 th Annual International Astrophysical Conference, edited by G. Li, Q. Hu, O. Verkhoglyadova, G. Zank, R. Lin and J. Luhmann, AIP 10399, 375-383, 2008. McNutt, J.R.L., A solar wind trigger for the outer heliospheric radio emissions and the distance to the terminal shock, Geophys. Res. Lett., 15, 1307-1310, 1988 Richardson, J.D., C. Wang, J.C. Kasper and Y. Liu, Propagation of the October/November, 2003 CME s through the heliosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L03503, doi:10.1029/ 2004GL020679, 2005 Richardson, J.D., et al., Source and consequences of a large shock near 79 AU, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L23107, doi:10.1029/2006gl027983, 2006 Richardson, J.D., C. Wang and M. Zhang, Plasma in the outer Heliosphere and the Heliosheath, Physics of the Inner Heliosphere, CP 858, AIP, 110-115, 2006. Washimi, H., G.P. Zank, Q. Hu, T. Tanaka and K. Munakata, A forecast of the heliospheric termination shock position by three-dimensional MHD simulations, ApJ, 670, L139-L142, 2007

9 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 Webber, W.R., An empirical estimate of the heliospheric termination shock location with time with application to the intensity increases of MeV protons seen at Voyager 1 in 2002-2005, J. Geophys. Res., 110, A10103, doi:10.1029/2005ja011209, 2005 Webber, W.R., A.C. Cummings, F.B. McDonald, E.C. Stone, B. Heikilla and N. Lal, Passage of a large interplanetary shock from the inner heliosphere to the heliospheric termination shock and beyond: Its effects on cosmic rays at Voyagers 1 and 2, GRL, 34, 20, L20107, doi: 10.1029/2007GL031339, 2007 Zank, G.P., I.H. Cairns, D.J. Donahue and W.H. Matthews, Radio emission and the heliospheric termination shock, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 14729-14735, 1994 225

10 226 227 228 229 230 231 Figure Captions Figure 1: khz radio emissions observed by V1 (courtesy of D.A. Gurnett, 2007). Figure 2: Daily average solar wind speed measured by the MIT plasma probe on V2. Numbered events indicate the passage of various shocks as discussed in the text. Figure 3: Daily average solar wind pressure measured by MIT plasma probe on V2. Numbered events indicate the passage of various shocks as discussed in the text. 232

11 233 234 235 FIGURE 1

12 236 237 238 239 240