Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research Vol. 0, No. 4, Winter 203, p. 68-689 68-689. 39 4 0 (PSM) (PGPR) (N 80 ) 2-89/2/ : 9/6/6 : (PSM) (PGPR). 388 Pseudomonas fluorescens or Psu+Bacillus subtilis ) 2 ) Azp + Psu + ) (Azotobacter brasilense or Azt+Azospirillum lipoferum or Azp ) (or BAC. ( 20 60 0) ( 50 75 0) ((BAC... 75. 50 (r=0/85 ). (r=0/69 ) (r=0/56 ) (r=0/68 ) (r=0/73 )... :.(20).(3).(9).(28) - (Email: hadisbahari@yahoo.com : -) -2
39 4 0 682 (... ) (6).(29 2 4)..(9). 39 36 4 4 53. 388.. 2 ) ) ( ) ( 50 75. ( 20 60. N 80... 2..(32).(24 2).(5).(23)...(3 4).(27 9) (PGPR).(3) 2 (PSM).(33) Pseudomonas (5) fluorescens... -Plant growth promoting rhizobactria (PGPR) 2-Phosphate solubilizing microorganism (PSM)
683... (PGPR) - () 54/2 28/8 7 ) ( 380 6/88 () 0/4 4 7/08 ( ) 3/36 (CFU/ml) 0 8 0 8 0 8-2 Azotobacter brasilense, Azospirillum lipoferum Pseudomonas fluorescens, Bacillus subtili Azospirillum, Pseudomona, Bacillus 2.(.(3 ) (P 0/05) ( 4/00) 75 75 50.(2 ). (26).(2) (34)..(32).(3 ) 0 0/08 30 28. ( 0 ). 20 60. ) (. 24 75. SAS Institute, ) SAS9. ANOVA (LSD) (997..(3 ) (P 0/05) ( 3/24) 60. 20 ) ( 2/76) - Least significant difference
39 4 0 684 ( ) -3 98/6 63/4 46/5 /8 /6 5/8 4/26 9/90 /4 20/8 50/3 29/4 3/06 2/04 3/ 2/09 6/65 4/0 42/5 49/9 48/7 6/9 8/4 2/4 2/9 2/6 9/84 3/4 30/6 8/73 0/5 0/3 0/77 0/2 0/54 8/7 3/82 3/6 /93 0/06 0/04 0/4 0/04 0/3 0/3 3/2 4/0 2/58 0/35 0/9 0/22 0/9 0/5 2/9 3 2 2 6 6 4 2 72 (A) (B) (C) A B A C B C A B C 5 () -2 (LSD 0/05 =0/37) LSD ) ( ) (LSD 0/05 =0/8) - LSD ).(4 ) (0) - (25). (7). ( ) 4/69 50 ( ) 5/70 ( ).(4 ).(4 ) 20. 8/6 7/3 /9 5/2
685... (PGPR) -4 ( ) ( ) 35/b 36/3ab 37/8a 35/3b /9 36/2ab 37/3a 34/9b /6 34/9b 37/2a 36/4ab /6 7/48c 8/53b 9/6a 8/63b 0/4 7/39b 8/93a 9/04a 0/35 7/88b 8/7a 8/76a 0/35 4/84b 5/42a 5/68a 5/58a 0/3 4/69c 5/57b 5/7a 0/26 5/2b 5/46a 5/56a 0/26 2 ( 5) LSD 75 50 ( 5) LSD 60 20 ( 5). 5 (LSD). LSD LSD LSD.(3 8) (3 ).(22). 50 20. (3 ) (4 )... 75. 60 (3 ). (4 ). 22/5..(3).(8)
39 4 0 686. (7 ).(6 ) 20 60. =/2) -4 (LSD 0/05 LSD ).(3 ) 75 5.(4 ). 20 60. (9/6)..(5 ). (7/5) ()...(7) -5 (LSD 0/05 =/3) LSD ).(8 ) 2. ( ).(4) -3 =/2) (LSD 0/05 LSD ) (P 0/05) (P 0/0). 75 50
687... (PGPR). (r=0/56 ) 0/05=/7) -8 (LSD LSD ) -6 (LSD 0/05 =/4) LSD ) ( ). -7 (LSD 0/05 =/4) LSD ) (5 ). (r=0/85 ) 0/23 (n=08) -5 0/9-0/7 0/56 0/85 0/69 0/68 0/25 0/5 0/6 0/0 0/73 0/56 0/72 0/37 5
39 4 0 688.380.... -.59-56 :()3..32-.386..... -2. 5.367-376 :(2)38..386.... -3.69-53 :()5...388...... -4.5-4 :()7...385....... -5.43-34 :(20)...388....... -6.40-33 :()....388..... -7.36-359.. 2-24...388...... -8.76-75.. 2-24....386..... -9.47.. 25-26.389......65-76 :(2)24...389...... -0.80-65 :(2)3..604 - Alamri, S. A. and Y. S., Mostafa. 2009. Effect of nitrogen supply and Azospirillum brasilense SP-248 on the response of wheat to seawater irrigation. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 6: 0-07. 2- Behl, R. K., H.Sharma, V. Kumar, and K. P. Singh. 2003. Effect of duel inoculation of V A micorrhyza and Azotobacter chroococcum on above flag leaf characters in wheat. Agronomy and Soil Science. 49(): 25-3. 3- Chen, Y.P., P. D., Rekha, A. B. Arun, F. T., Shen, W. A Lai, and C. Young. 2005. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria from subtropical soil and their tricalcium phosphate solubilizing abilities. Department of Soil and Environmental Sciences, National Chung Hsing University. Applied Soil Ecology. 34(): 33-4. 4- Cherr, C. M., J. M. S. Scholberg, and R. Mcsorlery. 2006. Green manure approaches to crop production. Agronomy Journal. 98: 302-39. 5- Diaz, M., M.Virginia, and F. Canigia. 2009. Field performance of a liquid formulation of Azospirillum brasilensilense on dryland wheat productivity. European Journal of Soil Biology. 45(): 3-. 6- Freitas, J.R.de., M.R., Banerjee, and J.J. Germide, 997. Phosphate-solubilizing rhizobacteria enhance the growth and yield but not phosphorus uptake of canola (Brassica napus L.). Biological Fertilizer Soils. 24: 358-364. 7- Gilick, B. R., D. Penrose, and M. Wenbo. 200. Bacteria promotion of plant growth. Biotechnology Advances. 9: 35-38. 8- Jha, B., M. C., Thakur, I., Gontia, V. Albrecht, M. Stoffels, and H. Hartman. 2009. Isolation, partial dentification and application of diazotrophic rhizobacteria from traditional Indian rice cultivars. European Journal of Soil Biology. 45: 62-72..
689... (PGPR) 9- Kapulnik, Y., Y. Okon and Y. Henis. 2007. Changes in root morphology of wheat caused by Azospirillum inoculation. Microbiology. 3: 88-887. 20- Kumuta, K., Sempaualan, J. and Krishnan, P.S. 2004. Effect of insoluble phosphate and dual inoculation on soybean. In: Kannaryan, S., Kumar, K., Gouidarajan, K. (eds), Biofertilizers. pp: 354-358. 2- Naiman, A. D., A. Latronico, and G. Salamon. 2009. Inoculation of wheat Azospirillum brasilense and Peseudomonas fluorescens: Impact on the production and culturable rhizosphere microflora. 2009. European Journal of Soil Biology. 45: 44-5 22- Nikolay, S., A. Strigul, and V. Kravchenco. 2006. Mathematical modeling of PGPR inoculation into the rhizosphere. Enviromental Modeling and Software. 2: 58-7. 23- Oliveira, C. A., Alves, M. C. Marriel, I. E. Gomes, E. A. Scotti, M. R. Carneiro, N. P. Guimaraes, C.T. Schaffert R. E and Sa, N. M. 2008. Phosphate solubilizing microorganisms isolated from rhizosphere of maize cultivated in an oxisol of the Brazilian Cerrado Biome. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 3: -6. 24- Pamella, A.C., Steven, S.H., 982. Inorganic phosphate solubilization by rhizospher in a zostera marine community. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 28: 605-60. 25- Patidar, M. 200. Integrated nutrient management in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and its resideul effect on wheat (Triticum aestivum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 7(9): 587-590. 26- Piromyou, P., Buranabanyat, B., Tantasawat, P., Tillabutr P, and Teaumroong., N. 20. Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) inoculation on microbial community structure in rhizosphere of forage corn cultivated in Thailand. European Journal of Soil Biology. 47: 44-54. 27- Roberts, T. L. 2008. Improving nutrient use efficiency. Turkish Journal Agriculture and Forestry Sciences. 32: 77-82. 28- Roesi, D., Gaur, R., Johri, B. N., Imfeld, G., Sharma, S., Kawaljeet K, and Aragno, M. 2006. Plant growth stage, fertilizer management and bio-inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria affect the rhizobacteria community structure in rainfed wheat fields. Soil. Biological Biochemistry. 38: -20. 29- SAS Institute. 997. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6.2. SAS Institute, Inc., NC. 30- Turan, M., Ataoglu, N and Sahin, F. 2006. Evaluation of the capacity of phosphate solubilizing bacteria and fungi on different forms of phosphorus in liquid culture. Sustainable Agricultural. 28: 99-08. 3- Wagar, A., B. Shahrna, Z. A. Zahir and M. Arshad. 2004. Icolation with Acc deaminase containing rhizobacteria for improving growth and yield of wheat. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research. 4: 9-24. 32- Wu, B., S. C. Caob, Z. H. Lib, Z. G Cheunga, and K. C. Wonga. 2005. Effects of bioferilizer containing N-fixr, P and K solubilizer and AM fungi on maize growth. Geoderma. 25: 55-62. 33- Zahir, Z. A, U. Chani, M. Naveed, S.M. Nadeem, H. N., Asghar. 2009. Comparative effectiveness of Psedomonas and Serratia Sp. Containing ACC-deaminase for improving growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under salt-stressed conditions. Archives of Microbiology Journal. 9: 45-424.