II. FOURIER TRANSFORM ON L 1 (R)

Similar documents
1 Fourier Integrals on L 2 (R) and L 1 (R).

TOOLS FROM HARMONIC ANALYSIS

TOPICS IN FOURIER ANALYSIS-III. Contents

Math 172 Problem Set 5 Solutions

Indeed, the family is still orthogonal if we consider a complex valued inner product ( or an inner product on complex vector space)

Bernstein s inequality and Nikolsky s inequality for R d

Fourier Series. 1. Review of Linear Algebra

Math 205b Homework 2 Solutions

Reminder Notes for the Course on Distribution Theory

MATH 6337 Second Midterm April 1, 2014

MATH 6337: Homework 8 Solutions

Marcinkiewicz Interpolation Theorem by Daniel Baczkowski

FOURIER TRANSFORMS. 1. Fourier series 1.1. The trigonometric system. The sequence of functions

Fall f(x)g(x) dx. The starting place for the theory of Fourier series is that the family of functions {e inx } n= is orthonormal, that is

Math 172 Problem Set 8 Solutions

Lecture 4: Fourier Transforms.

CHAPTER VI APPLICATIONS TO ANALYSIS

1 Fourier Integrals of finite measures.

Fourier Series. ,..., e ixn ). Conversely, each 2π-periodic function φ : R n C induces a unique φ : T n C for which φ(e ix 1

ABSTRACT MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES FOR THE ANALYSIS OF PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS. Kevin K. Tran. April 2018

Folland: Real Analysis, Chapter 8 Sébastien Picard

be the set of complex valued 2π-periodic functions f on R such that

FOURIER ANALYSIS & METHODS

SOLUTIONS OF SELECTED PROBLEMS

8 Singular Integral Operators and L p -Regularity Theory

MAT 771 FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS HOMEWORK 3. (1) Let V be the vector space of all bounded or unbounded sequences of complex numbers.

Fourier Transform & Sobolev Spaces

THE RESTRICTION PROBLEM AND THE TOMAS-STEIN THEOREM

Advanced Analysis Qualifying Examination Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Massachusetts. Tuesday, January 16th, 2018

18.3 The Fourier Transform

V. SUBSPACES AND ORTHOGONAL PROJECTION

NAME: MATH 172: Lebesgue Integration and Fourier Analysis (winter 2012) Final exam. Wednesday, March 21, time: 2.5h

Let R be the line parameterized by x. Let f be a complex function on R that is integrable. The Fourier transform ˆf = F f is. e ikx f(x) dx. (1.

Average theorem, Restriction theorem and Strichartz estimates

MATH MEASURE THEORY AND FOURIER ANALYSIS. Contents

Sobolev spaces. May 18

u t = u p (t)q(x) = p(t) q(x) p (t) p(t) for some λ. = λ = q(x) q(x)

EXPOSITORY NOTES ON DISTRIBUTION THEORY, FALL 2018

Outline of Fourier Series: Math 201B

5. Fourier transformation of distributions

Real Analysis Chapter 8 Solutions Jonathan Conder. = lim n. = lim. f(z) dz dy. m(b r (y)) B r(y) f(z + x y) dz. B r(y) τ y x f(z) f(z) dz

1 Review of di erential calculus

A Brief Analysis of Central Limit Theorem. SIAM Chapter Florida State University

TOPICS IN FOURIER ANALYSIS-IV. Contents

Tools from Lebesgue integration

17 The functional equation

Heisenberg s inequality

1.5 Approximate Identities

Real Analysis Problems

Math 115 ( ) Yum-Tong Siu 1. Derivation of the Poisson Kernel by Fourier Series and Convolution

Singular Integrals. 1 Calderon-Zygmund decomposition

REAL ANALYSIS I HOMEWORK 4

Real Analysis: Homework # 12 Fall Professor: Sinan Gunturk Fall Term 2008

Solutions: Problem Set 4 Math 201B, Winter 2007

Expository Notes on Introduction to Harmonic Analysis

Approximation Theorems and Convolutions

the convolution of f and g) given by

Partial Differential Equations

Metric Spaces. Exercises Fall 2017 Lecturer: Viveka Erlandsson. Written by M.van den Berg

Errata Applied Analysis

n 1 f = f m, m=0 n 1 k=0 Note that if n = 2, we essentially get example (i) (but for complex functions).

Introduction to Harmonic Analysis

18.175: Lecture 15 Characteristic functions and central limit theorem

3: THE SHANNON SAMPLING THEOREM

Constructing Approximations to Functions

Math 5440 Problem Set 6 Solutions

Rotated Corners in the Integer Lattice

Introduction to Harmonic Analysis

FOURIER SERIES, HAAR WAVELETS AND FAST FOURIER TRANSFORM

We denote the space of distributions on Ω by D ( Ω) 2.

MATH 5640: Fourier Series

d(x n, x) d(x n, x nk ) + d(x nk, x) where we chose any fixed k > N

Advanced Real Analysis

The Hilbert transform

Introduction to Harmonic Analysis

Differentiation and function spaces

4 Riesz Kernels. Since the functions k i (ξ) = ξ i. are bounded functions it is clear that R

Characterization of Distributional Point Values of Tempered Distribution and Pointwise Fourier Inversion Formula

Real Analysis, October 1977

arxiv: v3 [math.fa] 6 Oct 2016

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

sech(ax) = 1 ch(x) = 2 e x + e x (10) cos(a) cos(b) = 2 sin( 1 2 (a + b)) sin( 1 2

Course 212: Academic Year Section 1: Metric Spaces

Linear Independence of Finite Gabor Systems

APPLICATIONS OF DIFFERENTIABILITY IN R n.

Chapter 9. Parabolic Equations. 9.1 Introduction. 9.2 Some Results from Functional Analysis

1.3.1 Definition and Basic Properties of Convolution

CHAPTER II HILBERT SPACES

With an Emphasis on Uncertainty Principles. Cameron LaVigne

f (x)e inx dx 2π π for 2π period functions. Now take we can take an arbitrary interval, then our dense exponentials are 1 2π e(inπx)/a.

Starting from Heat Equation

1/12/05: sec 3.1 and my article: How good is the Lebesgue measure?, Math. Intelligencer 11(2) (1989),

2) Let X be a compact space. Prove that the space C(X) of continuous real-valued functions is a complete metric space.

f(f 1 (B)) B f(f 1 (B)) = B B f(s) f 1 (f(a)) A f 1 (f(a)) = A f : S T 若敘述為真則證明之, 反之則必須給反例 (Q, ) y > 1 y 1/n y t > 1 n > (y 1)/(t 1) y 1/n < t

MATH FALL 2014

Part II Probability and Measure

The uniform uncertainty principle and compressed sensing Harmonic analysis and related topics, Seville December 5, 2008

ZETA FUNCTIONS ATTACHED TO PREHOMOGENEOUS VECTOR SPACES. Disc(g x) = (det g) 2 Disc x. Stab(x) 1 Disc(x) s. Aut R 1 Disc R s

A List of Problems in Real Analysis

Vectors in Function Spaces

Transcription:

II. FOURIER TRANSFORM ON L 1 (R) In this chapter we will discuss the Fourier transform of Lebesgue integrable functions defined on R. To fix the notation, we denote L 1 (R) = {f : R C f(t) dt < }. The norm L 1 (R) on L 1 (R) is defined as f L 1 (R) = f(t) dt. For convenience, we usually write 1 in stead of L 1 (R). It can be checked that L 1 (R) satisfies conditions in Definition 2 of last Chapter, hence it is indeed a norm. Similarly to the case of L 2 ([ π, π]), we can define Cauchy Sequence in L 1 (R) and Convergence of sequence of functions in L 1 (R). We will let the reader to work out the details of these definition. Also similar to L 2 ([ π, π]), every Cauchy sequence in L 1 (R) converges to some function in L 1 (R), though this is a fact beyond the scope of our course. Definition 1. For any function f L 1 (R), we define F(f)(ξ) = f(x)e iξx dx. For any function f L 1 (R), F(f) is a well defined function, since for any ξ R, f(x)e iξx dx f(x)e iξx dx = f(x) dx. The function F(f) is called the Fourier transform of f. often write ˆf is stead of F(f). For convenience, we Theorem 1. Let f, g L 1 (R). Then (a) (f + g)(ξ) = ˆf(ξ) + ĝ(ξ). (b) For any c C, (cf)(ξ) = c ˆ (f)(ξ). 1 Typeset by AMS-TEX

2 II. FOURIER TRANSFORM ON L 1 (R) (c) Let f be the complex conjugate of f, then f(ξ) = ˆf( ξ). (d) For any fixed real number y, let function f y be defined as f y (x) = f(x y), then ˆf y (ξ) = ˆf(ξ)e iξy. (e) For any fixed real number λ > 0, let function ϕ be defined as ϕ(x) = λf(λx), then ˆϕ(ξ) = ˆf( ξ λ ). Remark The theorem above contains some of the most frequently used properties of Fourier transform. The proof is routine, we leave the details for the reader. Less used, is the fact that the Fourier transform of any f L 1 (R) is a bounded uniformly continuous function. To show this fact, we need some big theorem in the theory of Lebesque integration. Lebesque Dominant Convergence Theorem. Let f, g L 1 (R). Suppose that the sequence {f n } n=1 L 1 (R) satisfies the following two conditions: (a) f n (x) g(x) for every n N and almost every x R. (b)for almost every x R, lim n f n (x) = f(x). Then lim n f n(x)dx = f(x)dx. Theorem 2. Let f L 1 (R). Then (a) ˆf(ξ) f 1 for any ξ R. (b) ˆf is uniformly continuous on R. Proof. (a) We compute ˆf(ξ) = f(x)e iξx dx f(x)e iξx dx = f(x) dx = f 1. (b) For any real number η, ξ, let us look at ˆf(ξ + η) ˆf(ξ), and hope that for any ε > 0, we can find a δ > 0 independent of ξ, such that for any η < δ, and any ξ, we always have ˆf(ξ + η) ˆf(ξ) < ε. We compute ˆf(ξ + η) ˆf(ξ) = f(x)e iξ+ηx f(x)e iξx dx = f(x)e iξ+ηx f(x)e iξx dx f(x) e ηx 1 dx. Since the right-hand side above is a function with variable η, we only need to show that lim η 0 f(x) e ηx 1 dx = 0. Thus it is enough to show that for any sequence {η n } n=1 with lim n η n = 0, lim n f(x) e η nx 1 dx = 0.

II. FOURIER TRANSFORM ON L 1 (R) 3 Now Lebesque Dominant Convergence Theorem comes into play, since for any such {η n } n=1, clearly lim n f(x) e η nx 1 = 0 for any x R. Also f(x) e η nx 1 2 f(x) and certainly 2 f(x) L 1 (R) since f(x) L 1 (R). It then follows that lim n f(x) e η nx 1 dx = 0. Next we introduce the concept of convolution of two functions f, g L 1 (R), we need Fubini s Theorem. The following is a not quite correct version of this theorem. But is will do for our course. Fubini s Theorem. Suppose { f(x, y) dx}dy <. Then for almost every fixed x R, f(x, y) L 1 (R) as a function in y; For almost every fixed y R, f(x, y) L 1 (R) as a function in x. Furthermore, { f(x, y)dx}dy = { f(x, y)dy}dx. Remark Suppose f, g L 1 (R), then for every fixed y, f(x y)g(y) is the product of the function f(x y) L 1 (R) with a constant g(y), thus for fixed y, f(x y)g(y) L 1 (R) (as a function in x). So f(x y)g(y) dx is well defined for each fixed y, namely it is a function of y. Now let us integrate: { f(x y)g(y) dx}dy = g(y) { f(x y) dx}dy = g(y) { f(x) dx}dy = g(y) f 1 dy = f 1 g 1 <. Now according to Fubini s theorem, for almost every x, f(x y)g(y) L 1 (R) as a function of y, hence f(x y)g(y)dy is well defined. We denote h(x) = f(x y)g(y)dy, and we will try to prove that h L1 (R). Indeed, h(x) dx = = { f(x y)g(y)dy dx f(x y)g(y) dx}dy = f 1 g 1 <. { f(x y)g(y) dy}dx The second to the last equal sign above is a consequence of Fubini s theorem. Usually we use f g to denote the function h above. Definition 2. Let f, g L 1 (R). Then f g(x) = f(x y)g(y)dy is well defined and f g L 1 (R). We call f g the convolution of f and g. We list a few basic properties of convolution.

4 II. FOURIER TRANSFORM ON L 1 (R) Theorem 3. Let f, g L 1 (R). Then (a) f g = g f. (b) f g(ξ) = ˆf(ξ) ĝ(ξ). The proof of this theorem is routine with the aid of Fubini s theorem. We leave it to the reader. Next we introduce the Inverse Fourier transform. Definition 3. Let f L 1 (R) be a function such that ˆf L 1 (R). Then Inverse Fourier transform of ˆf is defined as F 1 ( ˆf)(x) = 1 2π ˆf(ξ)e ixξ dξ. Our main goal in this chapter is to prove the fact that under certain conditions, we can take Inverse Fourier transform of ˆf to get back to function f, but Not Always! First, let us introduce a special class of functions in L 1 (R). Definition 4. The function e x2 is called the Gaussian function. For any α > 0, denote G α (x) = 1 2 πα e x 2 4α. We call the collection of G α s the Gaussian family. Remark Using the fact that G(x) = π, it can be checked that each function in the Gaussian family is in L 1 (R). In order to find the Fourier transform of these functions, we rely on the following facts which can be obtained through computations not too lengthy, and it is left to the reader. Lemma 1. For any a > 0, π e ax2 e iξx dx = a e ξ 2 4a. Lemma 2. For any α > 0, let G α be defined above. Ĝ α (ξ) = e αξ2. Then G α(x)dx = 1, Relying on these two lemmas and some more trivial facts about Gaussian family, we reach the following two important technical results. We will only prove the first of two propositions below since the second one involves only simple computation. Proposition 1. Let f L 1 (R). f(x) is continuous at x = t. Then lim α 0 +(f G α)(t) = f(t).

II. FOURIER TRANSFORM ON L 1 (R) 5 Proof. We want to show that for any ε > 0, there is a δ > 0, such that for any 0 < α < δ, we always have (f G α )(t) f(t) < ε. = Since G α(x)dx = 1, we see that for any α > 0, (f G α )(t) f(t) f(t x)g α (x)dx f(t)g α (x)dx = (f(t x) f(t))g α (x)dx. Because f(x) is continuous at x = t, so for this ε > 0, there exists η > 0, such that for all x < η, we have f(t x) f(t) < 1 3ε. Thus, for any α > 0, (f G α )(t) f(t) η η η η f(t x) f(t) G α (x)dx+ f(t x) f(t) G α (x)dx f(t x) f(t) G α (x)dx+ f(t x) G α (x)dx+ f(t) G α (x)dx 1 3 ε + max G α(x) f(t x) dx+ f(t) G α (x)dx 1 3 ε + G α(η) f 1 + f(t) G 1 (x)dx. x > η α With η fixed, now it should be easy to choose a desirable δ. We will let the reader to finish the proof. Proposition 2. Let f, g L 1 (R). Then f(x)ĝ(x)dx = ˆf(x)g(x)dx. We need one more technical lemma before the major theorem of the chapter. The proof of following lemma, like that of above proposition, is only computations and we leave it for the reader. Lemma 3. For fixed t R and α > 0, define g t,α (y) = 1 2π eiyt e αy2, then ĝ t,α (x) = G α (t x). Finally, the main theorem of this chapter. Theorem 4. Let f L 1 (R) be a function such that ˆf L 1 (R). If f(x) is continuous at x = t. Then f(t) = (F 1 ˆf)(t).

6 II. FOURIER TRANSFORM ON L 1 (R) Proof. Note that by Proposition 1, f(t) = lim α 0 +(f G α )(t). So we only need to show (F 1 ˆf)(t) = lim α 0 +(f G α)(t). Now by Theorem 3, Lemma 3, Proposition 2, and the definition of the function g x,α, in that order we have (f G α )(t) = = f(x)g α (t x)dx = ˆf(x)g t,α (x)dx = 1 2π f(x)ĝ t,α (x)dx ˆf(x)e ixt e αx2 dx. So the reach our goal, it is enough to show that for any sequence {α n } n=1 of positive numbers with lim n α n = 0, lim n 1 2π ˆf(x)e ixt e α nx 2 dx = 1 2π ˆf(x)e ixt dx. Now Lebesque Dominant Convergence Theorem comes to rescue. Indeed, since for almost all x, lim ˆf(x)e ixt e α nx 2 = ˆf(x)e ixt. n Also for almost all x, ˆf(x)e ixt e α nx 2 conclusion follows. ˆf(x) and ˆf(x) L 1 (R), the