Structures in tangent categories

Similar documents
Differential structure, tangent structure, and SDG

CLASSIFYING TANGENT STRUCTURES USING WEIL ALGEBRAS

Homological Algebra and Differential Linear Logic

An Introduction to the Stolz-Teichner Program

QUANTIZATION VIA DIFFERENTIAL OPERATORS ON STACKS

Lie groupoids and Lie algebroids

Atiyah classes and homotopy algebras

BRIAN OSSERMAN. , let t be a coordinate for the line, and take θ = d. A differential form ω may be written as g(t)dt,

arxiv: v1 [math.dg] 26 Jun 2015

Categorical techniques for NC geometry and gravity

Outline of Synthetic Differential Geometry F. William Lawvere

The generally covariant locality principle and an extension to gauge symmetries

Lie 2-algebras and Higher Gauge Theory. Danny Stevenson Department of Mathematics University of California, Riverside

Supercategories. Urs July 5, Odd flows and supercategories 4. 4 Braided monoidal supercategories 7

Derivations and differentials

SOME PROBLEMS AND RESULTS IN SYNTHETIC FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS

Geometry 9: Serre-Swan theorem

LECTURE 3 MATH 261A. Office hours are now settled to be after class on Thursdays from 12 : 30 2 in Evans 815, or still by appointment.

Vector Bundles on Algebraic Varieties

EXERCISES IN POISSON GEOMETRY

Connections for noncommutative tori

Three Descriptions of the Cohomology of Bun G (X) (Lecture 4)

Introduction to Chiral Algebras

LOOP GROUPS AND CATEGORIFIED GEOMETRY. Notes for talk at Streetfest. (joint work with John Baez, Alissa Crans and Urs Schreiber)

Topos Theory. Lectures 17-20: The interpretation of logic in categories. Olivia Caramello. Topos Theory. Olivia Caramello.

Math 535a Homework 5

Loos Symmetric Cones. Jimmie Lawson Louisiana State University. July, 2018

Dual Adjunctions Between Algebras and Coalgebras

Representing Representations up to Homotopy

Solvable Lie groups and the shear construction

IndCoh Seminar: Ind-coherent sheaves I

sset(x, Y ) n = sset(x [n], Y ).

class # MATH 7711, AUTUMN 2017 M-W-F 3:00 p.m., BE 128 A DAY-BY-DAY LIST OF TOPICS

DERIVED HAMILTONIAN REDUCTION

MILNOR SEMINAR: DIFFERENTIAL FORMS AND CHERN CLASSES

1 Categorical Background

CHARACTERISTIC CLASSES

Hochschild homology and Grothendieck Duality

9. The Lie group Lie algebra correspondence

1 Introduction: connections and fiber bundles

1 Differentiable manifolds and smooth maps

What are stacks and why should you care?

About Lie Groups. timothy e. goldberg. October 6, Lie Groups Beginning Details The Exponential Map and Useful Curves...

The Hitchin map, local to global

Mapping class groups of surfaces and quantization

DEFINITIONS: OPERADS, ALGEBRAS AND MODULES. Let S be a symmetric monoidal category with product and unit object κ.

Comparison for infinitesimal automorphisms. of parabolic geometries

Classification of definable groupoids and Zariski geometries

DEFINITION OF ABELIAN VARIETIES AND THE THEOREM OF THE CUBE

Groupoid Representation Theory

WEYL STRUCTURES FOR PARABOLIC GEOMETRIES

THE NEWLANDER-NIRENBERG THEOREM. GL. The frame bundle F GL is given by x M Fx

NOTES ON ATIYAH S TQFT S

Direct Limits. Mathematics 683, Fall 2013

Quaternionic Complexes

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.dg] 1 Nov 1996

Cohomology jump loci of local systems

The Kervaire Invariant One Problem, Talk 0 (Introduction) Independent University of Moscow, Fall semester 2016

We then have an analogous theorem. Theorem 1.2.

Math 231b Lecture 16. G. Quick

Category Theory. Categories. Definition.

j Despite the notation, h is not the pull-back by a smooth map! In particular,

1. Algebraic vector bundles. Affine Varieties

ALEXEY V. GAVRILOV. I p (v) : T p M T Expp vm the operator of parallel transport along the geodesic γ v. Let E p be the map

What s category theory, anyway? Dedicated to the memory of Dietmar Schumacher ( )

ON COSTELLO S CONSTRUCTION OF THE WITTEN GENUS: L SPACES AND DG-MANIFOLDS

Workshop on Supergeometry and Applications. Invited lecturers. Topics. Organizers. Sponsors

Serre A -functors. Oleksandr Manzyuk. joint work with Volodymyr Lyubashenko. math.ct/ Notation. 1. Preliminaries on A -categories

Symmetries of Parabolic Geometries

On the Twisted KK-Theory and Positive Scalar Curvature Problem

A users guide to K-theory

Duality, Residues, Fundamental class

CATEGORICAL GROTHENDIECK RINGS AND PICARD GROUPS. Contents. 1. The ring K(R) and the group Pic(R)

General Relativity: Curvature and torsion of a connection

Representations and Linear Actions

On 2-Representations and 2-Vector Bundles

ARCHIVUM MATHEMATICUM (BRNO) Tomus 42 (2006), Supplement,

Braid group actions on categories of coherent sheaves

Categories and Modules

Lecture 5. vector bundles, gauge theory

Effective Constraints

Notes on p-divisible Groups

Categorical models of homotopy type theory

p,q H (X), H (Y ) ), where the index p has the same meaning as the

THEp 1 -CENTRALEXTENSIONOF THE MAPPING CLASS GROUP OF ORIENTABLE SURFACES

D-manifolds and derived differential geometry

arxiv: v2 [math.ct] 31 Oct 2018

University of Oxford, Michaelis November 16, Categorical Semantics and Topos Theory Homotopy type theor

Analysis and Enriched Category Theory

Math 248B. Applications of base change for coherent cohomology

A categorical model for a quantum circuit description language

Homology and Cohomology of Stacks (Lecture 7)

MODULI TOPOLOGY. 1. Grothendieck Topology

Patrick Iglesias-Zemmour

Derived Algebraic Geometry III: Commutative Algebra

CANONICAL CONNECTIONS. by Ken-Hsien Chuang B.S., National Yang-Ming University, 2000 M.S., Brandeis University, 2003

2-DIMENSIONAL TOPOLOGICAL QUANTUM FIELD THEORIES AND FROBENIUS ALGEBRAS. Contents 1. The main theorem 1

Lie algebra cohomology

Background on c-projective geometry

Tangent Categories. David M. Roberts, Urs Schreiber and Todd Trimble. September 5, 2007

Transcription:

Structures in tangent categories Geoff Cruttwell Mount Allison University (joint work with Robin Cockett) Category Theory 2014 Cambridge, UK, June 30th, 2014

Outline What are tangent categories? Definitions: intuitive and more precise. Examples. What can one do within a tangent category? Vector fields and their Lie bracket. Vector spaces. Vector bundles. Differential forms. Connections on a vector bundle.

Tangent categories (intuitively) Definition (Rosický 1984, modified Cockett/Cruttwell 2013) (Intuitively) A tangent category consists of a category X, which has, for each object M, an associated bundle over M, called TM, with the following properties: each TM is an additive bundle over M, in a natural way; each TM is a vector bundle over M, in a natural way; T preserves the structure of each bundle TM in a natural way.

Tangent categories (more precisely) Definition More specifically, this means we have a functor T : X X, with: (projection) a natural transformation p : T I ; (addition and zeroes) natural transformations + : T 2 T and 0 : I T ; (vertical lift) a natural transformation l : T T 2 satisfying a certain universality property; (canonical flip) a natural transformation c : T 2 T 2 ; a number of coherence axioms.

Tangent category examples (i) The canonical example: finite dimensional smooth manifolds. (ii) Convenient manifolds (with the kinematic tangent bundle). (iii) Any Cartesian differential category. (iv) The infinitesimally linear objects in a model of synthetic differential geometry. (v) Commutative ri(n)gs and its opposite (and other associated categories in algebraic geometry). (vi) The category of C- rings. (vii) (Lack/Leung) A category of Weyl algebras. (viii) (Rosický) If X has tangent structure, then so does each slice X/M.

Vector fields and their Lie bracket Definition If (X, T ) is a tangent category with an object M X, a vector field on M is a map M v TM with pv = 1. If X has negation, given two vector fields v 1, v 2 : M TM, Rosický showed how to use the universal property of vertical lift to define the Lie bracket vector field [v 1, v 2 ] : M TM so that the Jacobi identity is satisfied. [v 1, [v 2, v 3 ] + [v 3, [v 1, v 2 ]] + [v 2, [v 3, v 1 ]] = 0

Vector Spaces/Differential objects Vector spaces in tangent categories are represented by objects whose tangent bundle is trivial: Definition A differential object in a tangent category consists of a commutative monoid (A, σ, ζ) with a map ˆp : TA A such that A ˆp TA p A is a product diagram, so that TA = A A (as well as some additional coherence axioms). R n s in the category of smooth manifolds. The pullback of p : TM M along a point of M. If T is representable with representing object D, get an associated ring R which is differential (thus satisfying the Kock-lawvere axiom).

Vector/Differential bundles (intuition) In general: a group bundle is a group in X/M; a vector bundle is a vector space in X/M; so a differential bundle should be a differential object in the canonical tangent category structure on X/M.

Vector/Differential bundles (more precisely) Definition A differential bundle in a tangent category consists of an additive bundle q : E M with a map λ : E TE so that q : E M becomes a differential object in the slice tangent category X/M. (i) If A is a differential object, then for each object M, π 2 : A M M is a differential bundle. (ii) For each object M, p : TM M is a differential bundle. (iii) The pullback of a differential bundle q : E M along any map f : X M is a differential bundle. (iv) If q : E M is a differential bundle, T (q) : TE TM is also.

Linear maps between differential bundles A morphism of differential bundles between differential bundles (q : E M), (q : E M ) is simply a pair of maps f : E E, g : M M making the obvious diagram commute. A morphism of differential bundles (f, g) is linear if it also preserves the lift, that is, E f E λ T (E) T (f ) λ T (E ) commutes. Note: this does correspond to the ordinary definition of linear morphisms between vector bundles in the canonical example.

(Vector-valued) Differential forms Definition If M is an object of X and q : E M a differential bundle, a E-valued differential n-form on M consists of a map ω : T n M E which is linear in each variable and alternating. In the case when the differential bundle is of the form π 2 : A M M for some differential object A, these are ordinary differential forms - in particular in the canonical example, when A = R.

Connections (intuitively) Intuitive idea: can move tangent vectors between different tangent spaces. Moving a tangent vector around a closed curve measures the curvature of the space. Connections have been expressed in many different ways: as a horizontal subspace ; as a connection map ; as a notion of parallel tranport ; as a covariant derivative. Quoting Michael Spivak: I personally feel that the next person to propose a new definition of a connection should be summarily executed.

Two fundamental maps A differential bundle has two key maps involving TE whose composite is the zero map: E 88888888888 TE λ Tq,p 8 TM M E

Horizontal lift A connection consists of a linear section of H of Tq, p called the horizontal lift... E 88888888888 TE H λ Tq,p 8 TM M E

Connector which in addition has a linear retraction K of λ called the connector: E 88888888888 TE K H λ Tq,p 8 TM M E

Connection definition that satisfies the equations KH = 0 and (λk 0p) + H Tq, p = 1 TE. E 88888888888 TE K H λ Tq,p 8 TM M E

Simple example Any differential object A is a differential bundle over 1 and these have a canonical connection given by: K : TA A by K(v, a) := v and H : A TA by H(a) := (0, a).

K from H and vice versa Suppose (X, T) is a tangent category with negation and (q, λ) is a differential bundle. Proposition If H is a linear section of T (q), p, then q can be given the structure of a connection with horizontal lift H. Proposition If K is a linear retract of λ, and q has at least one section J of T (q), p, then q can be given the structure of a connection with connector K.

Flat connections The definition of a connection being flat in the literature is quite complicated, but by using the map c we can make a very simple definition: Definition Say that a connection is flat if ct (K)K = T (K)K. One can show this is equivalent to the standard definition (involving curvature) in the canonical example.

Affine and torsion-free connections Torsion-free connections are connections on the tangent bundle for which the movement of tangent vectors does not twist. Again there is a simple definition of this in our setting: Definition When the connection is on a tangent bundle p : TM M, the connection is called affine. Say an affine connection is torsion-free if ck = K. This again is again equivalent to the usual definition (involving the Lie bracket) in the canonical example.

Conclusions Most categories related to differential or algebraic geometry are tangent categories. The following are well-defined notions in any tangent category: vector fields, the Lie bracket, vector spaces and bundles, differential forms, and connections. The definitions of differential object and bundle shed light on the nature of vector spaces and bundles in differential geometry. The definition of connections, as well as their properties of being torsion-free and affine, shed light on connections in differential geometry.

References References: Cockett, R. and Cruttwell, G. Differential structure, tangent structure, and SDG. Applied Categorical Structures, Vol. 22 (2), pg. 331 417, 2014. Rosický, J. Abstract tangent functors. Diagrammes, 12, Exp. No. 3, 1984.