Homework 3 due Friday, April 26. A couple of examples where the averaging principle from last time can be done analytically.

Similar documents
Homework 4 will be posted tonight, due Wednesday, May 8.

Continuum Limit of Forward Kolmogorov Equation Friday, March 06, :04 PM

First Passage Time Calculations

Langevin Equation Model for Brownian Motion

Let's transfer our results for conditional probability for events into conditional probabilities for random variables.

Eulerian (Probability-Based) Approach

NPTEL

Stochastic Integration (Simple Version)

Homework 3 due Monday, November 19 at 5 PM. Hint added to Problem 2.2.

FDST Markov Chain Models

Examples of Countable State Markov Chains Thursday, October 16, :12 PM

Handbook of Stochastic Methods

Mathematical Framework for Stochastic Processes

Introduction to asymptotic techniques for stochastic systems with multiple time-scales

Numerical methods in molecular dynamics and multiscale problems

STOCHASTIC PROCESSES IN PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY

Multiscale Analysis of Many Particle Systems with Dynamical Control

Transience: Whereas a finite closed communication class must be recurrent, an infinite closed communication class can be transient:

Weierstrass Products and More on Analytic Continuation

Handbook of Stochastic Methods

Nested Stochastic Simulation Algorithm for Chemical Kinetic Systems with Disparate Rates. Abstract

So in terms of conditional probability densities, we have by differentiating this relationship:

5 Applying the Fokker-Planck equation

Different approaches to model wind speed based on stochastic differential equations

The Smoluchowski-Kramers Approximation: What model describes a Brownian particle?

Birth-death chain models (countable state)

SOME ISSUES OF TURBULENCE

Fokker-Planck Equation with Detailed Balance

Effective dynamics for the (overdamped) Langevin equation

Energy is always partitioned into the maximum number of states possible.

Homogenization with stochastic differential equations

Effective dynamics of many-particle systems with dynamical constraint

Table of Contents [ntc]

Local vs. Nonlocal Diffusions A Tale of Two Laplacians

MITOCW ocw feb k

Once Upon A Time, There Was A Certain Ludwig

Homework 2 due Friday, October 11 at 5 PM.

18.02SC Multivariable Calculus, Fall 2010 Transcript Recitation 34, Integration in Polar Coordinates

Definitions. Notations. Injective, Surjective and Bijective. Divides. Cartesian Product. Relations. Equivalence Relations

If we want to analyze experimental or simulated data we might encounter the following tasks:

Control Theory in Physics and other Fields of Science

Classification of Countable State Markov Chains

Lecture 12: Detailed balance and Eigenfunction methods

EQUATION LANGEVIN. Physics, Chemistry and Electrical Engineering. World Scientific. With Applications to Stochastic Problems in. William T.

M4A42 APPLIED STOCHASTIC PROCESSES

Dynamics of a mass-spring-pendulum system with vastly different frequencies

Discrete solid-on-solid models

EFT Beyond the Horizon: Stochastic Inflation and How Primordial Quantum Fluctuations Go Classical

Functional RG for disordered elastic systems: what is it? what is it useful for?

Lecture 12: Detailed balance and Eigenfunction methods

Dynamical systems with Gaussian and Levy noise: analytical and stochastic approaches

The correlation between stochastic resonance and the average phase-synchronization time of a bistable system driven by colour-correlated noises

Mathematical Foundations of Finite State Discrete Time Markov Chains

Finite temperature analysis of stochastic networks

PHYS 352. Noise. Noise. fluctuations in voltage (or current) about zero average voltage = 0 average V 2 is not zero

Stochastic differential equations in neuroscience

Study of Pre-equilibrium Fission Based on Diffusion Model

Active Matter Lectures for the 2011 ICTP School on Mathematics and Physics of Soft and Biological Matter Lecture 3: Hydrodynamics of SP Hard Rods

As you enter... (Write down the learning objective, the question and your answer.) What do you think it means for a reaction to occur spontaneously?

Hypocoercivity and Sensitivity Analysis in Kinetic Equations and Uncertainty Quantification October 2 nd 5 th

Representation of Markov chains. Stochastic stability AIMS 2014

General Physics - E&M (PHY 1308) - Lecture Notes. General Physics - E&M (PHY 1308) Lecture Notes

MITOCW 6. Standing Waves Part I

Introduction to Computer Simulations of Soft Matter Methodologies and Applications Boulder July, 19-20, 2012

2012 NCTS Workshop on Dynamical Systems

Appendix C extra - Concepts of statistical physics Cextra1-1

Physics 562: Statistical Mechanics Spring 2003, James P. Sethna Homework 5, due Wednesday, April 2 Latest revision: April 4, 2003, 8:53 am

Note that. No office hours on Monday October 15 or Wednesday October 17. No class Tuesday October 16

MITOCW ocw f99-lec09_300k

CSE 559A: Computer Vision

Statistical Mechanics

Beams III -- Shear Stress: 1

This is a Gaussian probability centered around m = 0 (the most probable and mean position is the origin) and the mean square displacement m 2 = n,or

I will post Homework 1 soon, probably over the weekend, due Friday, September 30.

Childrens game Up The River. Each player has three boats; throw a non-standard die, choose one boat to advance. At end of round, every boat is moved

Physics 111. Lecture 39 (Walker: 17.6, 18.2) Latent Heat Internal Energy First Law of Thermodynamics May 8, Latent Heats

CSE 559A: Computer Vision Tomorrow Zhihao's Office Hours back in Jolley 309: 10:30am-Noon

Diffusion in the cell

MD Thermodynamics. Lecture 12 3/26/18. Harvard SEAS AP 275 Atomistic Modeling of Materials Boris Kozinsky

Linear Response and Onsager Reciprocal Relations

Lecture 14: Advanced Conformational Sampling

New Physical Principle for Monte-Carlo simulations

The dynamics of small particles whose size is roughly 1 µmt or. smaller, in a fluid at room temperature, is extremely erratic, and is

Der SPP 1167-PQP und die stochastische Wettervorhersage

Langevin Methods. Burkhard Dünweg Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research Ackermannweg 10 D Mainz Germany

Sliding Modes in Control and Optimization

Chemistry 451. Prerequisites: CHEM 013, MATH 141, PHYS 202 or PHYS 212. Prof. Mueller/Sykes Chemistry 451 Spring 2004 Lecture 1-1

Instructor (Brad Osgood)

Brief review of Quantum Mechanics (QM)

February 20, Week 6. Homework #4, Due tonight. Mastering Physics: 9 problems from chapters 1 and 3 Written Question: 3.56

Computational Physics. J. M. Thijssen

COARSE-GRAINING AND THERMODYNAMICS IN FAR-FROM-EQUILIBRIUM SYSTEMS

macroscopic view (phenomenological) microscopic view (atomistic) computing reaction rate rate of reactions experiments thermodynamics

Stochastic2010 Page 1

16. Working with the Langevin and Fokker-Planck equations

Introduction to Stochastic SIR Model

Cellular Systems Biology or Biological Network Analysis

Lecture 2. When we studied dimensional analysis in the last lecture, I defined speed. The average speed for a traveling object is quite simply

if we factor non-zero factors out of rows, we factor the same factors out of the determinants.

MITOCW watch?v=fxlzy2l1-4w

Transcription:

Stochastic Averaging Examples Tuesday, April 23, 2013 2:01 PM Homework 3 due Friday, April 26. A couple of examples where the averaging principle from last time can be done analytically. Based on the alternative nondimensionalization of the Langevin equation (Klein- Kramers equation) from last time, we are set up for the averaging theorem through the following identification of variables: Now applying the averaging theorem, we first want to solve for the quasi-equilibrium distribution of the fast variable, given the slow variable: AppSDE13 Page 1

We note this is the same PDE that we've encountered before when we did the reduction to Smoluchowski dynamics; the solution is: The only difference is we can specify completely the function c(x') because we now have a conditional probability density for V', not a joint probability density. This quasi-equilibrium distribution should always be completely specified (no free constants). But what we see here, that is not always the case (see the next example), is that the quasi-equilibrium distribution for the fast variable V' is in fact independent of the slow variable X'. AppSDE13 Page 2

Now we average the drift coefficient in the slow equation against this quasiequilibrium probability density for the fast variable. So the averaging theory tells me that: This says that on this nondimensionalized time scale of order 1, the position isn't changing, to leading order. This is a classic symptom of a bad nondimensionalization choice. If one gets results that blow up in the perturbation theory, then probably the reference time scale was chosen too large, so that "the action was jumped over." If one gets boring or trivial results, then the reference time scale was likely chosen to be too short, so that the action didn't start yet. For our Langevin equation example: AppSDE13 Page 3

The ratio of the reference time scale in this alternative nondimensionalization to the reference time scale in the good nondimensionalization was The good nondimensionalization is therefore equivalent to rescaling time in the alternative nondimensionalization by That would put the equation in a form that isn't suitable for the averaging theorem. But there are other slow-fast theorems that you can find in Arnold, "Hasselmann's Program Revisited: The Analysis of Stochasticity in Deterministic Climate Models" E, Liu, and Vanden-Eijnden, "Analysis of Multiscale Methods for Stochastic Differential Equations" Liu, "Strong Convergence of Principle of Averaging for Multiscale Stochsatic Dynamical Systems" or compute a perturbation theory from scratch like we did. Let's consider a prototype model for overdamped stochastic dynamics (Smoluchowski dynamics) in a potential: These variables should be thought of as nondimensionalized. intelligently nondimensionalized potential energy The noise term on the slow variables could be thermal, but we've made it more general; noise coefficient AppSDE13 Page 4

The noise term on the slow variables could be thermal, but we've made it more general; noise coefficient The idea of this system is that one has taken a given complex system, identified "slow modes" and "fast modes," whose time scales are well separated (by a factor of Write differential equations for these slow and fast variables, nondimensionalize. For example, think in molecular dynamics of: Translation, rotation, large collective modes as slow Bond vibrations as fast Often one deals with systems where order parameters are invoked; these are typically what one thinks of as slow variables. Or one can think more simply of motion of a particle in a potential in multiple dimensions where the potential is steeper in some directions than others (before nondimensionalization.) First we solve the stationary Fokker-Planck equation for the fast variables to get the quasi-equilibrium distribution. Solve by integrating: We conclude: AppSDE13 Page 5

We conclude: Now one argues that in fact if the right hand size is not zero, one would not get a normalizable probability density. Easy to show for a constant right hand side. Wave hands about the absence of curl (appeal to some uniqueness theorem about elliptic operators on unbounded domains; I haven't found a precise reference yet) AppSDE13 Page 6

Normalization condition determines: In dimensional variables, this would appear as: This looks like a partition function in terms of the fast y variables, for a given value of the slow x variable. And we see that the conditional probability density for the y variable has the form of the canonical distribution with respect to the fast y variable, for a given value of the slow x variable. Now what is the averaged dynamics for the slow variables X? AppSDE13 Page 7

So our slow variable dynamics can (in nondimensional variables again) be approximated as follows: AppSDE13 Page 8

AppSDE13 Page 9 At least for overdamped, thermally forced physical systems, the effective (averaged) dynamics for slow variables, with the behavior of the coupled fast variables averaged out, is governed by a drift that is proportional to minus the gradient of the free energy (of the fast variables relative to the slow variables.) This kind of picture is common in theoretical physics, and we have simply showed how one can arrive at such descriptions (flow down the free energy) in terms of systematic averaging.