for the darker autunite and the formula

Similar documents
The crystal structure of saleeite, Mg[U02P04h. 10H20

THE TORBERNITE MINERALS AS MODEL COMPOUNDS FOR THE HYDROUS LAYER SILICATES*

X-ray Diffraction. Diffraction. X-ray Generation. X-ray Generation. X-ray Generation. X-ray Spectrum from Tube

CRYSTAL CHEMISTRY OF THE BASIC MANGANESE ARSENATES: III. The CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF EVEITE, Mn 2 (OH) (AsO 4 )

Schematic representation of relation between disorder and scattering

Chapter 2. X-ray X. Diffraction and Reciprocal Lattice. Scattering from Lattices

Applications of X-ray and Neutron Scattering in Biological Sciences: Symmetry in direct and reciprocal space 2012

The effect of isomorphous substitutions on the intensities of (OO1) reflections of mica- and chlorite-type structures.

SOLID STATE 18. Reciprocal Space

Crystals, X-rays and Proteins

STRUCTURES OF MERCURY MERCAPTIDES

PSD '17 -- Xray Lecture 5, 6. Patterson Space, Molecular Replacement and Heavy Atom Isomorphous Replacement

Preliminary investigation of an 8-quinolinol complex of uranium(v1)

Jack D. Dunitz. X-Ray Analysis and the Structure of Organic Molecules VCHP. (2nd Corrected Reprint) $ Verlag Helvetica Chimica Acta, Basel

Crystal Structure SOLID STATE PHYSICS. Lecture 5. A.H. Harker. thelecture thenextlecture. Physics and Astronomy UCL

The X-ray spectra and the structure of the atoms

The ideal fiber pattern exhibits 4-quadrant symmetry. In the ideal pattern the fiber axis is called the meridian, the perpendicular direction is

Further refinement of the goyazite structure

Fro. 2. Fibrous brucite in vein of chrysotile asbestos, Asbestos, Quebec. Pr,ern I. Frc. 1. Photograph of fibrous brucite from Asbestos, Quebec.

The Crystal Structure of Sodium Pentafluorodistannate(II), NaSn2Fs*

ABERNATHYITE, A NEW URANIUM MINERAL OF THE METATORBERNITE GROUP*

The crystal structure of BiOCI

General theory of diffraction

XVI. The Crystal Structure of Benitoite, BaTiSia09.

Department' of Inorganic Chemistry, Technical University, Budapest Received Apdl 15, 1972 Presented by dr. J. NAGY. Introduction

Physical Chemistry Analyzing a Crystal Structure and the Diffraction Pattern Virginia B. Pett The College of Wooster

Overview - Macromolecular Crystallography

Fast, Intuitive Structure Determination IV: Space Group Determination and Structure Solution

Structure Report for J. Reibenspies

X-RAY INVESTIGATION OF FBRRIERITE, A ZEOLITE. Lroyp W. Sr,tpros, (Jniaersity of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon. Ansrnect

PX-CBMSO Course (2) of Symmetry

Handout 13 Interpreting your results. What to make of your atomic coordinates, bond distances and angles

C. C. WILSON. ISIS Facility, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon OX 11 OQX, UK

DETERMINATION OF THE CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF LIROCONITE CU2A1[As04] (OH)4.4H20 R. V. Kolesova and E. G. Fesenko

Protein crystallography. Garry Taylor

Supplementary Material for. Herapathite

The crystal and molecular structure of thioformaldehyde trimer

X-ray determination of centrosymmetry in three felspars. 1

Chapter 3. The structure of crystalline solids 3.1. Crystal structures

Solid State Spectroscopy Problem Set 7

THERMAL TRANSFORMATIONS OF PYROPHYLLITE AND TALC AS REVEALED BY X-RAY AND ELECTRON DIFFRACTION STUDIES*

Phase identification and structure determination from multiphasic crystalline powder samples by rotation electron diffraction

Scattering by two Electrons

Crystal lattice Real Space. Reflections Reciprocal Space. I. Solving Phases II. Model Building for CHEM 645. Purified Protein. Build model.

Crystals! Table of Contents. Vocabulary 2. Word Search 6. What is a Crystal? 7. Atoms, Ions, Molecules. and the Unit Cell 13.

Axial Ratios, Parameters, Miller Indices

THE CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF a-stc, TYPE VI. LBwrs S. RalrsoBr.r., Mineralogical Laboratory, (Jni.aersity of Mich'igan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

The structure of liquids and glasses. The lattice and unit cell in 1D. The structure of crystalline materials. Describing condensed phase structures

Cages on a plane: a structural matrix for molecular 'sheets'

THE CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF IODOFORM. M. L. HucerNs enn B. A. Nonrn, Stanford Uniaersity.

Basic Crystallography Part 1. Theory and Practice of X-ray Crystal Structure Determination

Crystallographic Symmetry. Jeremy Karl Cockcroft

Determining Protein Structure BIBC 100

Dehydration processes in the meta-autunite group minerals meta-autunite, metasaléeite, and metatorbernite

What use is Reciprocal Space? An Introduction

Analytical Methods for Materials

X-ray Data Collection. Bio5325 Spring 2006

Characteristics and Structure of Matter Perry Sprawls, Ph.D.

Courtesy of Ray Withers Electron Diffraction and the Structural Characterization of Modulated and Aperiodic Structures

Scattering Lecture. February 24, 2014

the crystal structure of aravaipaite.

THE CONTRIBUTIONS WHICH HAVE

Direct Method. Very few protein diffraction data meet the 2nd condition

4. Other diffraction techniques

How to study minerals?!

What is the Phase Problem? Overview of the Phase Problem. Phases. 201 Phases. Diffraction vector for a Bragg spot. In General for Any Atom (x, y, z)

An accurate determination of the crystal structure of triclinic potassium dichromate, K, Cr, 0,

SOLID STATE 9. Determination of Crystal Structures

Spectroscopy: The Study of Squiggly Lines. Reflectance spectroscopy: light absorbed at specific wavelengths corresponding to energy level transi8ons

The crystal structure of kilchoanite, Ca6(SiO 4)(Si30lO)' with some comments on related phases

IRREVERSIBLE DEHYDRATION IN MONTMORILLONITE

Gobbinsite, a new zeolite mineral from Co. Antrim, N. Ireland

XRD Intensity Calculations -Example FCC Cu (centric)


Handout 7 Reciprocal Space

The luminescence of diamond-i

Crystallography past, present and future

disordered, ordered and coherent with the substrate, and ordered but incoherent with the substrate.

Phase problem: Determining an initial phase angle α hkl for each recorded reflection. 1 ρ(x,y,z) = F hkl cos 2π (hx+ky+ lz - α hkl ) V h k l

X-rays. X-ray Radiography - absorption is a function of Z and density. X-ray crystallography. X-ray spectrometry

X-ray diffraction is a non-invasive method for determining many types of

Structure of Crystalline Solids

Crystallography Reading: Warren, Chapters 2.1, 2.2, 2.6, 8 Surface symmetry: Can be a clue to underlying structure. Examples:

X-ray powder data for idoerase

Data Collection. Overview. Methods. Counter Methods. Crystal Quality with -Scans

- A general combined symmetry operation, can be symbolized by β t. (SEITZ operator)

NANO 703-Notes. Chapter 21: Using CBED

Stephen F. Nelsen, Asgeir E. Konradsson, Rustem F. Ismagilov, Ilia A. Guzei N N

AP5301/ Name the major parts of an optical microscope and state their functions.

THE UNIT CELL AND SPACE GROUP OF LINDGRENITE Wrr-uau H. Bnnxrs, National' Research Council', Ottawa, Ontar'io, Canada'

CONTRIBUTED PAPERS DETERMINATION OF A DIFFICULT STRUCTURE: A CASE OF STRONG CORRELATIONS BETWEEN PARAMETERS R. KURODA

New lithium-ion conducting perovskite oxides related to (Li, La)TiO 3

The CB[n] Family: Prime Components for Self-Sorting Systems Supporting Information

Transmission Electron Microscopy

HYDROUS URANIUM MOLYBDATE IN MARYSVALE ORE*

Rigid body Rigid body approach

Supplementary Information

About Earth Materials

Surface Sensitivity & Surface Specificity

Crystal structures and crystal chemistry of the uranyl oxide hydrates becquerelite, billietite, and protasite

Transcription:

MINERALOGICAL NOTES TIIE AMERICAN MINERALOGIST, VOL. 48, NOVEMBER-DECEMBER, 1963 THE CRYSTALLOGRAPHY OF META-AUTUNITE (I)1 M.lr.cor.rt Ross, [/. S. Geological Suraey, Washington 25, D. C. INrnolucrroN The exact unit-cell size and space-group symmetry of meta-autunite (I), Ca(UOrPOn)r.nH2O, have been in dispute for some time, for example, see Takano (1961), Donnay and Donnay (1955), Makarov and Ivanov (1960) and Volborth (1959). In this paper data are presented in an attempt to give a more complete answer to these crystallographic questions. There appear to be three hydration states for autunite. Autunite is the fully hydrated phase, meta-autunite (I) is in the next lower hydration state, and meta-autunite (II) (not found occurring naturally) is in the lowest hydration state. The exact number and positions of the water molecuies in the autunites are not known. The material examined here is from the Daybreak mine, Mt. Spokane, Washington and is similar to that studied by Leo (1960). The autunite and meta-autunite (I) crystals from Mt. Spackane vary in color from Iight to very dark green, almost black. Leo found the Ua+ content of the darker crystals to be higher than that of the lighter crystals. The darker phase also had higher indices of refraction and a higher density than the lighter phase. Leo gives the formula (Ca, Sr, U'+)o nr(uo.)r 16-1 s6(por)z.oo 9.77HzO for the darker autunite and the formula (Ca, Sr, Ua+)o sg(uor)r su(pon), 6s.10.64H2O for the lighter autunite. Although an attempt was made to maintain the autunite crystals in the fully hydrated state prior chemical analysis there was probably some dehydration to meta-autunite (I). For other pertinent data on the chemical and physical properties of autunite and meta-autunite (I) from Mt. Spokane the reader is referred to Leo's paper. Expn,trl.elttAl WoRK Both light and dark green, nearly black meta-autunite (I) crystals were examined by Buerger precession techniques. Many small crystals were photographed and only those which gave unusualiy sharp Bragg reflections were selected for a complete study. Zirconium-filtered molybdenum radiation (Ka:0.7107 A) was used for most photographs. Buerger pre- I Publication authorized by the Director, U. S. Geological Survey.

1390 MINERALOGICAL NOTES TaBLn 1 UNrr-CBr,r. Dere ron MBra-AuruNrrr (I), Ca(UOsPOr)z.nHrO Unit cell o (A), (A) Laue group Space group V (A) Pseudo-unit cell a'(a) c'(a) Pseudo-space group Density (calc.) Density (obs.) Z 9:t Forms Locality Present studlrl t9.78+0.02 16.92+0.03 4fmmm P4122 6620 6.99 8.46 P4/nmm 3.53 g/cm3 3 3.45-3. 5.5 g/cm3 a l6 1.579-1.5861 11101,10011 Mt. Spokane, Washington Donnay and Donnal' (1ess) I'etragonal 19.82 849 4/mmm P4f mrnmz 3335 70r 8.49 P4/nmm 3 503 3.48 8 Lauter, Saxony I Size and color of crystals examined are: a) black, 0.05 by 0.20 by 0 35 mm, b) light green, 0.03 by 0 20 by 0.42 mm. Both crystals gave identical unit-cell data with a:19.78 and c:16.92 A. 2 or P422, P4mm, P42m, P4m2. 3 for 6HzO. I Leo (1960) cession photographs of the hk0, hk1, hk2, hk4, hk6, hhl, h(hf4)1, and h (h+8)l reciprocal lattice nets were nade. Exposure times were approximately 80 hours. The unit-celi data found in the present study are corrpared in Table 1 to those given by Donnay and Donnay (1955) for metaautunite (I) from Lauter, Saxony (U. S. National Museum Nos. 1342, 5675). Prior to the study by Donnay and Donnay most workers recognized only the pseudo-cell with a:7.o A and c:8.5 A. tte pseudo-cell is rotated t[5o about the c-axis with respect to the true cell. All r-ray photographs show 4f mmm. Laue symmetry. The following condition limiting the possible reflections was observed: 001:l :2n

MINERALOGICAL NOTES 1391 lx l-') Ur i- I 1* D / * a -<- 5 Frc. 1. &fto Buerger precession photograph taken with zirconium-fi.ltered molybdenum radiation of meta-autunite (I) from Mt. Spokane, Washington. showing weak supe-rlattice reflections. The subscript (s) refers to the axes of the pseudo-celi with a: b:6.99 A. The space group is thrs P4222. The pseudo-cell with a:6.99 A and c:8.46 A shows the following condition limiting the possible reflections: hk0:h*k:2n. The space group for the pseudo-cell is P4/nmm. Figure l shows a Buerger precession photograph of the hko reciprocal lattice net of metaautunite (I). The weak super-lattice reflections are apparent. The fact that Donnay and Donnay also observed these weak reflections on a sample from a difierent locality indicates that the large o-dimension of 19.8 A is typical of this mineral. The only disagreement with the data of Donnay and Donnay is that the present study indicates a doubling of the c-dimension. This doubling is indicated by extremely weak spots appearing in the hk1 photographs. Films made with copper radiation show the presence of the 221,44I,881,041,081, O.t2.1,26I,481, and 4.12.1 reflections. Films made with molybdenum radiation show the presence of the 441, 481, 4.20.1, 4.28.1,8.16.1, 8.24.L, 12.20.t, 12.24.1, and 16.20.1 reflections.

1392 MINERALOGICAL NOTES Tna AuruNrro SrnucrunB Pnosr,BN[ The identity of the unit-cell parameters of the light- and dark-green crystals indicates that Ua+ does not enter the meta-autunite (I) structure. The strongest line of uraninite was observed in r-ray powder patterns of the black autunite crystals (Leo, 1960, p. 115). It is probable, as Leo suggests in his paper, that the UOr in the chemical analyses is due to finely disseminated particles of uraninite. These particles probably cause the darkening of the autunite crystals. Takano (1961) has suggested that the large cell found by Donnay and Donay (1955) is incorrect and that a pseudo-cell with a--6.972 A, and c:8.17 A is actually the correct one. Takano obtained his data with a diffractometer (and Weissenberg camera?) using copper radiation. Such techniques cannot be expected to pick up the very weak reflections that indicate a larger unit cell. Makarov and Ivanov (1960) have attempted to solve the structure of meta-autunite (I) on the basis of the sub-cell. These workers collected Okl and hko intensity data with rotation techniques using copper radiation. The choice of an incorrect space group by Makarov and Ivanov forced them to propose a structural model in which one calcium atom must be distributed over two positions (2c) and six water molecules over eight positions (87) of space group P4f nmm. Their structure, based on an electron density map projected on (100) confirms Beintema's (1938) proposed structure for the (UO2PO+)""- Iayers, but their proposal for the positions of the interlayer calcium and water molecules cannot be considered correct. By calculating Fourier projections in the incorrect space group, they have forced a false statistical distribution of these atoms. The difficulty encountered by various workers in the study of the minerals of the autunite group is due to the fact that the large contribution of the heavy uranium atoms to the observed intensities tends to obscure the contributions of the light oxygen atoms and cations. Also, for compounds which contain heavy elements such as uranium, c-ray absorption errors will generally be large, particularly if copper radiation is used. The absorption of r-rays will tend to further obscure the contributions of the light atoms to the reflections. The uranium atoms in the autunite type structures usually occupy special positions, and consequently, will contribute scattering intensity only to certain special classes of reflections corresponding to a pseudocell. In such cases the true cell and symmetry can be deduced only by taking into account the other classes of very weak reflections. Because it is the light oxygen atoms that determine the principles of coordination, bonding, and packing in these structures, these weak reflections may

MINERALOGICAL NOTES 1393 play a crucial role in the crystal structure analysis. An attempt to propose a structure based on the pseudo-cell on the assumption that the true structure is a minor distortion of it will probably lead to anomalous results. The need for careful attention to the weak classes of reflections has been demonstrated by Ross and Evans (1962), and Ross (1962) in their study of the crystal structures of the autunite-like compounds K(LIOzAsO+).SUrO (abernathyite), NHn(UO2AsOa).3H2O, K(HaO) (UOzAsOa)r. 6H2O, and Cu(UOzPOa)2. 8HrO (meta-torbernite). In order to ensure the determination of the correct crystallography by recording the very weak ;r-ray reflections, the following procedures have been found to be most essential: (1) very small, well crystallized single crystals are studied, (2) photographs are taken with molyebdnum radiation using long exposure times (50 to 200 hours), (3) the Buerger precession camera is used for it gives the clearest and most easily interpretable photographs, and (4) precession photographs are taken especially of the reciprocal lattice net planes parallel to the flattened {001} form of the thin crystal plates (for example, hk0, hk1, etc.) so as to minimize the absorption errors (Donnay and Donnay, 1955). RelnnBncrs BnrNrnue, J. (1938) On the composition and the crystallography of autunite and the meta-autunites Rec. trataur ch,im. Pays-Bas 57, 155-175. DorlNlv, G.rlnrnr.r.n auo J. D. H. Douwav (1955) Contribution to the crystallography of uranium minerals. U. S. Geol. Su.rley Rept. TEI-507. Lno, G. W. (1960) Autunite from Mt. Spokane, Washington. Am. Mineral. 45,99-728. Mer,tnov, E. S eno V. I Ive.Nov (1960) Crystal structure of meta-autunite, Ca(UOi)z(POr)z'6HzO. Dohlad.y Ahad. Nauk S,S,SR, 132, 673-676 (in Russian). Rcss, Mnrcolu (1962) The crystallography, crystal structure, and crystal chemistry of various minerals and compounds belonging to the torbernite mineral group. Ph D. Thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. --- AUD H. T. Evaxs, Jn. (1962) The crystal structures and crystal chemistry of various members of the metatorbernite group (a"bs.). Am. Mineral. 47, p. 202. 'l'.rxano, Yu<ro (1961) X-ray study of autunite. Am. Mi.nerol. 46, 812-822. Vor.lontrr, A. (1959) Strontian meta-autunite from the Daybreak mine, Mt. Spokane, Washington. Am. Mineral. 4, 702-771.