Cocycle deformation of operator algebras

Similar documents
DEFORMATION OF OPERATOR ALGEBRAS BY BOREL COCYCLES

arxiv: v2 [math.oa] 26 Nov 2013

Coarse geometry and quantum groups

Exotic Crossed Products and Coaction Functors

Actions of Compact Quantum Groups I

Operator Space Approximation Properties for Group C*-algebras

Positive definite functions on locally compact quantum groups

Almost periodic functionals

J þ in two special cases

Outline. Multipliers and the Fourier algebra. Centralisers continued. Centralisers. Matthew Daws. July 2009

NON-COMPACT QUANTUM GROUPS ARISING FROM HEISENBERG TYPE LIE BIALGEBRAS

Modules over the noncommutative torus, elliptic curves and cochain quantization

Deformation of Kählerian Lie groups

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.oa] 10 Feb 2000

von Neumann algebras, II 1 factors, and their subfactors V.S. Sunder (IMSc, Chennai)

COMPACT QUANTUM METRIC SPACES AND ERGODIC ACTIONS OF COMPACT QUANTUM GROUPS

Representations of a semi-direct product hypergroup

Crossed products of irrational rotation algebras by finite subgroups of SL 2 (Z) are AF

Non separated points in the dual spaces of semi simple Lie groups

arxiv:math/ v2 [math.oa] 20 Oct 2004

Product type actions of compact quantum groups

Fermionic coherent states in infinite dimensions

Operator Algebras II, Homological functors, derived functors, Adams spectral sequence, assembly map and BC for compact quantum groups.

THE K-THEORY OF FREE QUANTUM GROUPS

Noncommutative geometry, quantum symmetries and quantum gravity II

LECTURE 16: LIE GROUPS AND THEIR LIE ALGEBRAS. 1. Lie groups

Kasparov s operator K-theory and applications 4. Lafforgue s approach

On algebraic index theorems. Ryszard Nest. Introduction. The index theorem. Deformation quantization and Gelfand Fuks. Lie algebra theorem

ON SECOND COHOMOLOGY OF DUALS OF COMPACT GROUPS

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.oa] 3 Nov 2005

The Dirac-Ramond operator and vertex algebras

The projectivity of C -algebras and the topology of their spectra

A locally compact quantum group of triangular matrices.

Preliminaries on von Neumann algebras and operator spaces. Magdalena Musat University of Copenhagen. Copenhagen, January 25, 2010

THE NONCOMMUTATIVE TORUS

COUNTEREXAMPLES TO THE COARSE BAUM-CONNES CONJECTURE. Nigel Higson. Unpublished Note, 1999

Noncommutative geometry and quantum field theory

Primitivity and unital full free product of residually finite dimensional C*-algebras

The Dirac operator on quantum SU(2)

LECTURE 11: SYMPLECTIC TORIC MANIFOLDS. Contents 1. Symplectic toric manifolds 1 2. Delzant s theorem 4 3. Symplectic cut 8

June 2014 Written Certification Exam. Algebra

On Some Local Operator Space Properties

QUATERNIONS AND ROTATIONS

THE EULER CHARACTERISTIC OF A LIE GROUP

T-duality & noncommutative geometry

arxiv: v1 [math.kt] 31 Mar 2011

Unbounded operators in the context of C -algebras

Kirillov Theory. TCU GAGA Seminar. Ruth Gornet. January University of Texas at Arlington

Noncommutative Poisson Boundaries

QUANTUM FIELD THEORY: THE WIGHTMAN AXIOMS AND THE HAAG-KASTLER AXIOMS

Graded modules over classical simple Lie algebras

7th focused semester on Quantum Groups

Acta Mathematica Academiae Paedagogicae Nyíregyháziensis 24 (2008), ISSN

MATRICIAL STRUCTURE OF THE HAAGERUP L p -SPACES (WORK IN PROGRESS) and describe the matricial structure of these spaces. Note that we consider the

A Crash Course in Topological Groups

10. The subgroup subalgebra correspondence. Homogeneous spaces.

GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION

p-operator Spaces Zhong-Jin Ruan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign GPOTS 2008 June 18-22, 2008

Cartan MASAs and Exact Sequences of Inverse Semigroups

Cartan sub-c*-algebras in C*-algebras

Towers of algebras categorify the Heisenberg double

CATEGORICAL DUALITY FOR YETTER DRINFELD ALGEBRAS

William Arveson Department of Mathematics University of California Berkeley CA 94720, USA. 29 February, 2000

Quadratic reciprocity (after Weil) 1. Standard set-up and Poisson summation

EXPANDERS, EXACT CROSSED PRODUCTS, AND THE BAUM-CONNES CONJECTURE. 1. Introduction

QUANTIZATION VIA DIFFERENTIAL OPERATORS ON STACKS

Bundles over quantum weighted projective spaces

Topics in Representation Theory: Roots and Weights

Overview of Atiyah-Singer Index Theory

Math 121 Homework 5: Notes on Selected Problems

Observables in the GBF

Quantizations of some Poisson Lie groups: The bicrossed product construction

Categorical techniques for NC geometry and gravity

A COMMENT ON FREE GROUP FACTORS

Fiberwise two-sided multiplications on homogeneous C*-algebras

On the classification and modular extendability of E 0 -semigroups on factors Joint work with Daniel Markiewicz

Universität des Saarlandes. Fachrichtung 6.1 Mathematik

Lecture 11: Clifford algebras

arxiv: v1 [math.kt] 23 Feb 2009

On the Baum-Connes conjecture for Gromov monster groups

Totally disconnected locally compact groups and operator algebras

FLABBY STRICT DEFORMATION QUANTIZATIONS AND K-GROUPS

Introduction to random walks on noncommutative spaces

Categories and Quantum Informatics

Many of the exercises are taken from the books referred at the end of the document.

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.fa] 7 Feb 2007

Quadratic reciprocity (after Weil) 1. Standard set-up and Poisson summation

C -algebras associated to dilation matrices

Geometric Structure and the Local Langlands Conjecture

A new class of pseudodifferential operators with mixed homogenities

K-theory for the C -algebras of the solvable Baumslag-Solitar groups

Quantizations and classical non-commutative non-associative algebras

Turbulence, representations, and trace-preserving actions

Quantum Symmetries of the Twisted Tensor Products of C -Algebras

Master Algèbre géométrie et théorie des nombres Final exam of differential geometry Lecture notes allowed

The operator algebra approach to quantum groups

C*-Algebras and Group Representations

Factorization of unitary representations of adele groups Paul Garrett garrett/

A noncommutative Amir-Cambern Theorem

Transcendental Numbers and Hopf Algebras

Transcription:

Cocycle deformation of operator algebras Sergey Neshveyev (Joint work with J. Bhowmick, A. Sangha and L.Tuset) UiO June 29, 2013 S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 1 / 21

Cocycle deformation Assume Γ is a discrete group, A = s Γ A s is a Γ-graded algebra, and Ω is a C -valued 2-cocycle on Γ, so Ω(s, t)ω(st, u) = Ω(t, u)ω(s, tu). Then we can define a new product on A by a s a t = Ω(s, t) 1 a s a t. We want to generalize this construction to the analytic setting, replacing A by a C -algebra and Γ by an arbitrary locally compact (quantum) group. S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 2 / 21

In which generality should we work? If A is a C -algebra and Γ is a locally compact group, an analogue of Γ-grading is a coaction of Γ on A. If G is a of locally compact group, then an action of G on a C -algebra can be thought of as a grading on A by the dual of G. It is natural to try to cover at least these two cases. For abelian group actions are in bijection with coactions of the dual. The deformation for actions/coactions of R d was defined by Rieffel, the particular case of actions of T d /coactions of Z d was defined by Connes and Landi, and both constructions have been since studied by many authors. S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 3 / 21

In which generality should we work? If A is a C -algebra and Γ is a locally compact group, an analogue of Γ-grading is a coaction of Γ on A. If G is a of locally compact group, then an action of G on a C -algebra can be thought of as a grading on A by the dual of G. It is natural to try to cover at least these two cases. For abelian group actions are in bijection with coactions of the dual. The deformation for actions/coactions of R d was defined by Rieffel, the particular case of actions of T d /coactions of Z d was defined by Connes and Landi, and both constructions have been since studied by many authors. S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 3 / 21

In which generality should we work? If A is a C -algebra and Γ is a locally compact group, an analogue of Γ-grading is a coaction of Γ on A. If G is a of locally compact group, then an action of G on a C -algebra can be thought of as a grading on A by the dual of G. It is natural to try to cover at least these two cases. For abelian group actions are in bijection with coactions of the dual. The deformation for actions/coactions of R d was defined by Rieffel, the particular case of actions of T d /coactions of Z d was defined by Connes and Landi, and both constructions have been since studied by many authors. S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 3 / 21

For finite group actions the construction of a new product is also well-known. More generally, assume (H, ˆ ) is a Hopf algebra, A is an algebra and H A A, x a x a, is an action of H making A a left H-module algebra. An invertible element Ω H H is called a 2-cocycle if (Ω 1)( ˆ ι)(ω) = (1 Ω)(ι ˆ )(Ω). Then a new product on A can be defined by a b = m(ω 1 (a b)), where m : A A A is the original product. S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 4 / 21

For finite group actions the construction of a new product is also well-known. More generally, assume (H, ˆ ) is a Hopf algebra, A is an algebra and H A A, x a x a, is an action of H making A a left H-module algebra. An invertible element Ω H H is called a 2-cocycle if (Ω 1)( ˆ ι)(ω) = (1 Ω)(ι ˆ )(Ω). Then a new product on A can be defined by a b = m(ω 1 (a b)), where m : A A A is the original product. S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 4 / 21

Denote by A Ω the algebra A with new product. The algebra A Ω is a module algebra over the new Hopf algebra H Ω such that H Ω = H as algebras, while the new coproduct on H Ω is defined by ˆ Ω (x) = Ω ˆ (x)ω 1. If H is the group algebra of a finite group G, there may exist cocycles that cannot be induced from abelian subgroups and are such that the Hopf algebra H Ω is neither commutative nor cocommutative (the simplest example is G = D 8 Z/2Z.) Since we need H Ω to recover back A from A Ω, we see that even if we are interested only in actions and coactions of finite groups, this is too little for a good theory. S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 5 / 21

Denote by A Ω the algebra A with new product. The algebra A Ω is a module algebra over the new Hopf algebra H Ω such that H Ω = H as algebras, while the new coproduct on H Ω is defined by ˆ Ω (x) = Ω ˆ (x)ω 1. If H is the group algebra of a finite group G, there may exist cocycles that cannot be induced from abelian subgroups and are such that the Hopf algebra H Ω is neither commutative nor cocommutative (the simplest example is G = D 8 Z/2Z.) Since we need H Ω to recover back A from A Ω, we see that even if we are interested only in actions and coactions of finite groups, this is too little for a good theory. S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 5 / 21

Setup Assume G is a locally compact quantum group, so we are given a von Neumann algebra L (G) together with a coassociative normal unital injective -homomorphism : L (G) L (G) L (G) such that there exist left and right invariant n.s.f. weights. A unitary dual 2-cocycle on G is a unitary Ω L (Ĝ) L (Ĝ) such that (Ω 1)( ˆ ι)(ω) = (1 Ω)(ι ˆ )(Ω). Assume we have a continuous left action of G on a C -algebra A, so we are given an injective -homomorphism α: A M(C 0 (G) A) such that ( ι)α = (ι α)α and such that (C 0 (G) 1)α(A) is dense in C 0 (G) A. We then want to define a deformation A Ω of A. Our approach is motivated by the work of Kasprzak for abelian locally compact groups G and continuous cocycles. S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 6 / 21

Setup Assume G is a locally compact quantum group, so we are given a von Neumann algebra L (G) together with a coassociative normal unital injective -homomorphism : L (G) L (G) L (G) such that there exist left and right invariant n.s.f. weights. A unitary dual 2-cocycle on G is a unitary Ω L (Ĝ) L (Ĝ) such that (Ω 1)( ˆ ι)(ω) = (1 Ω)(ι ˆ )(Ω). Assume we have a continuous left action of G on a C -algebra A, so we are given an injective -homomorphism α: A M(C 0 (G) A) such that ( ι)α = (ι α)α and such that (C 0 (G) 1)α(A) is dense in C 0 (G) A. We then want to define a deformation A Ω of A. Our approach is motivated by the work of Kasprzak for abelian locally compact groups G and continuous cocycles. S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 6 / 21

Setup Assume G is a locally compact quantum group, so we are given a von Neumann algebra L (G) together with a coassociative normal unital injective -homomorphism : L (G) L (G) L (G) such that there exist left and right invariant n.s.f. weights. A unitary dual 2-cocycle on G is a unitary Ω L (Ĝ) L (Ĝ) such that (Ω 1)( ˆ ι)(ω) = (1 Ω)(ι ˆ )(Ω). Assume we have a continuous left action of G on a C -algebra A, so we are given an injective -homomorphism α: A M(C 0 (G) A) such that ( ι)α = (ι α)α and such that (C 0 (G) 1)α(A) is dense in C 0 (G) A. We then want to define a deformation A Ω of A. Our approach is motivated by the work of Kasprzak for abelian locally compact groups G and continuous cocycles. S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 6 / 21

Setup Assume G is a locally compact quantum group, so we are given a von Neumann algebra L (G) together with a coassociative normal unital injective -homomorphism : L (G) L (G) L (G) such that there exist left and right invariant n.s.f. weights. A unitary dual 2-cocycle on G is a unitary Ω L (Ĝ) L (Ĝ) such that (Ω 1)( ˆ ι)(ω) = (1 Ω)(ι ˆ )(Ω). Assume we have a continuous left action of G on a C -algebra A, so we are given an injective -homomorphism α: A M(C 0 (G) A) such that ( ι)α = (ι α)α and such that (C 0 (G) 1)α(A) is dense in C 0 (G) A. We then want to define a deformation A Ω of A. Our approach is motivated by the work of Kasprzak for abelian locally compact groups G and continuous cocycles. S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 6 / 21

Deformation of C 0 (G) Consider the Fourier algebra A(G) C 0 (G). Identifying A(G) with L (Ĝ), define a new product on A(G) by a b = (a b)( ˆ ( )Ω ). In general, there is no natural involution on (A(G), ). Consider the multiplicative unitary Ŵ B(L 2 (G) L 2 (G)) of Ĝ. (If G is a group, then (Ŵ ξ)(s, t) = ξ(ts, t).) Then the cocycle identity can be written as ( ˆ ι)(ŵ Ω )Ω 12 = (Ŵ Ω ) 13 (Ŵ Ω ) 23. This shows that the formula π Ω (a) = (a ι)(ŵ Ω ) defines a representation of (A(G), ) on L 2 (G). S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 7 / 21

Deformation of C 0 (G) Consider the Fourier algebra A(G) C 0 (G). Identifying A(G) with L (Ĝ), define a new product on A(G) by a b = (a b)( ˆ ( )Ω ). In general, there is no natural involution on (A(G), ). Consider the multiplicative unitary Ŵ B(L 2 (G) L 2 (G)) of Ĝ. (If G is a group, then (Ŵ ξ)(s, t) = ξ(ts, t).) Then the cocycle identity can be written as ( ˆ ι)(ŵ Ω )Ω 12 = (Ŵ Ω ) 13 (Ŵ Ω ) 23. This shows that the formula π Ω (a) = (a ι)(ŵ Ω ) defines a representation of (A(G), ) on L 2 (G). S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 7 / 21

Denote by K the algebra K(L 2 (G)) of compact operators on L 2 (G). Theorem (Enock, De Commer) The norm closure of the algebra π Ω (A(G)) B(L 2 (G)) is a C -algebra C r (Ĝ; Ω). Furthermore, Ŵ Ω M(K C r (Ĝ; Ω)). The result is not difficult to prove for regular quantum groups, which covers most known examples of cocycles. We consider the C -algebras C r (Ĝ; Ω) as the deformations C 0(G) Ω of C 0 (G) with respect to the left action by translations of G on C 0 (G). For compact groups, the C -algebras C r (Ĝ; Ω) were introduced by Landstad and Wassermann around 1980. S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 8 / 21

Denote by K the algebra K(L 2 (G)) of compact operators on L 2 (G). Theorem (Enock, De Commer) The norm closure of the algebra π Ω (A(G)) B(L 2 (G)) is a C -algebra C r (Ĝ; Ω). Furthermore, Ŵ Ω M(K C r (Ĝ; Ω)). The result is not difficult to prove for regular quantum groups, which covers most known examples of cocycles. We consider the C -algebras C r (Ĝ; Ω) as the deformations C 0(G) Ω of C 0 (G) with respect to the left action by translations of G on C 0 (G). For compact groups, the C -algebras C r (Ĝ; Ω) were introduced by Landstad and Wassermann around 1980. S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 8 / 21

Denote by K the algebra K(L 2 (G)) of compact operators on L 2 (G). Theorem (Enock, De Commer) The norm closure of the algebra π Ω (A(G)) B(L 2 (G)) is a C -algebra C r (Ĝ; Ω). Furthermore, Ŵ Ω M(K C r (Ĝ; Ω)). The result is not difficult to prove for regular quantum groups, which covers most known examples of cocycles. We consider the C -algebras C r (Ĝ; Ω) as the deformations C 0(G) Ω of C 0 (G) with respect to the left action by translations of G on C 0 (G). For compact groups, the C -algebras C r (Ĝ; Ω) were introduced by Landstad and Wassermann around 1980. S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 8 / 21

Denote by K the algebra K(L 2 (G)) of compact operators on L 2 (G). Theorem (Enock, De Commer) The norm closure of the algebra π Ω (A(G)) B(L 2 (G)) is a C -algebra C r (Ĝ; Ω). Furthermore, Ŵ Ω M(K C r (Ĝ; Ω)). The result is not difficult to prove for regular quantum groups, which covers most known examples of cocycles. We consider the C -algebras C r (Ĝ; Ω) as the deformations C 0(G) Ω of C 0 (G) with respect to the left action by translations of G on C 0 (G). For compact groups, the C -algebras C r (Ĝ; Ω) were introduced by Landstad and Wassermann around 1980. S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 8 / 21

Quantization maps By a result of De Commer, the von Neumann algebra L (Ĝ) with the new coproduct ˆ Ω = Ω ˆ ( )Ω defines the dual of a locally compact quantum group G Ω. We have (Ŵ Ω Ω) 23 Ŵ 12 (Ŵ Ω Ω) 23 = (Ŵ Ω ) 12 (Ŵ Ω Ω) 13. (For group duals this is a known identity proving quasi-equivalence of the regular representation λ and of λ Ω λ Ω for a cocycle Ω.) This allows us to define, for ν K = B(L 2 (G)), maps T ν : C 0 (G) C r (Ĝ; Ω), T ν (x) = (ι ν)(ŵ Ω Ω(x 1)(Ŵ Ω Ω) ). It can be shown that the images of T ν span a dense subspace of C r (Ĝ; Ω). S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 9 / 21

Quantization maps By a result of De Commer, the von Neumann algebra L (Ĝ) with the new coproduct ˆ Ω = Ω ˆ ( )Ω defines the dual of a locally compact quantum group G Ω. We have (Ŵ Ω Ω) 23 Ŵ 12 (Ŵ Ω Ω) 23 = (Ŵ Ω ) 12 (Ŵ Ω Ω) 13. (For group duals this is a known identity proving quasi-equivalence of the regular representation λ and of λ Ω λ Ω for a cocycle Ω.) This allows us to define, for ν K = B(L 2 (G)), maps T ν : C 0 (G) C r (Ĝ; Ω), T ν (x) = (ι ν)(ŵ Ω Ω(x 1)(Ŵ Ω Ω) ). It can be shown that the images of T ν span a dense subspace of C r (Ĝ; Ω). S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 9 / 21

Deformed algebra For an arbitrary continuous action α: A M(C 0 (G) A) we define A Ω M(C r (Ĝ; Ω) A) as the C -algebra generated by elements of the form for all ν K and a A. (T ν ι)α(a), (For A = C 0 (G) and α = the ends meet: we have an isomorphism C 0 (G) Ω = C r (Ĝ; Ω) mapping (T ν ι) (a) into T ν (a).) S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 10 / 21

Examples 1. Assume G is the dual of a discrete group Γ, so Ω is a T-valued 2-cocycle on Γ. Then C r (Γ; Ω) is generated by the operators λ Ω s = λ s Ω(s, ) on l 2 (Γ), satisfying λ Ω st = Ω(s, t)λ Ω s λ Ω t. The maps T ν are T ν (λ s ) = ν(λ Ω s )λ Ω s. Given an action of G, that is, a coaction α: A C r (Γ) A of Γ, we see that A Ω is generated by elements λ Ω s a s, where α(a s ) = λ s a s. This is exactly how Connes-Landi define θ-deformations for Γ = Z n, and, more recently, Yamashita defines deformations for arbitrary discrete Γ. S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 11 / 21

Examples 1. Assume G is the dual of a discrete group Γ, so Ω is a T-valued 2-cocycle on Γ. Then C r (Γ; Ω) is generated by the operators λ Ω s = λ s Ω(s, ) on l 2 (Γ), satisfying λ Ω st = Ω(s, t)λ Ω s λ Ω t. The maps T ν are T ν (λ s ) = ν(λ Ω s )λ Ω s. Given an action of G, that is, a coaction α: A C r (Γ) A of Γ, we see that A Ω is generated by elements λ Ω s a s, where α(a s ) = λ s a s. This is exactly how Connes-Landi define θ-deformations for Γ = Z n, and, more recently, Yamashita defines deformations for arbitrary discrete Γ. S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 11 / 21

2. Assume we have a continuous left action γ of Ĝ op on a C -algebra B. We can define a (reduced) twisted crossed product by Ĝ op γ,ω B = [(JĴC r (Ĝ; Ω)ĴJ 1)α(B)], where the brackets denote the norm closure. Consider the C -algebra A = Ĝ op γ B equipped with the dual action α = ˆγ of G. Then it can be shown that that there exists a canonical isomorphism A Ω = Ĝ op γ,ω B. S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 12 / 21

2. Assume we have a continuous left action γ of Ĝ op on a C -algebra B. We can define a (reduced) twisted crossed product by Ĝ op γ,ω B = [(JĴC r (Ĝ; Ω)ĴJ 1)α(B)], where the brackets denote the norm closure. Consider the C -algebra A = Ĝ op γ B equipped with the dual action α = ˆγ of G. Then it can be shown that that there exists a canonical isomorphism A Ω = Ĝ op γ,ω B. S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 12 / 21

3. Assume G is a locally compact quantum group. The left and right action of G by translations on itself define a left action of G G op on C 0 (G). Consider the dual cocycle Ω (Ĵ Ĵ)Ω(Ĵ Ĵ) on G G op. Then it can be shown that the deformation of C 0 (G) with respect to the action of G G op and the above cocycle is canonically isomorphic to C 0 (G Ω ). S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 13 / 21

4. Consider G = V = R 2n. Fix a Euclidean norm and an orthogonal complex structure J on V. Identify ˆV with V using the pairing e i x,y, fix a deformation parameter h > 0 and consider the 2-cocycle Ω h (x, y) = e ih 2 x,jy on ˆV = V. Consider the normal state ν h on B(L 2 (V )) defined by the function ξ h (x) = ( ) h n/2 e h 4 x 2. 2π We then have ν h (λ Ω h x ) = ν h (λ Ω h x ) = e h 4 x 2. It can be shown that the elements (T νh ι)α(a), for all a A, span a dense subspace A Ωh. S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 14 / 21

4. Consider G = V = R 2n. Fix a Euclidean norm and an orthogonal complex structure J on V. Identify ˆV with V using the pairing e i x,y, fix a deformation parameter h > 0 and consider the 2-cocycle Ω h (x, y) = e ih 2 x,jy on ˆV = V. Consider the normal state ν h on B(L 2 (V )) defined by the function ξ h (x) = ( ) h n/2 e h 4 x 2. 2π We then have ν h (λ Ω h x ) = ν h (λ Ω h x ) = e h 4 x 2. It can be shown that the elements (T νh ι)α(a), for all a A, span a dense subspace A Ωh. S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 14 / 21

4. Consider G = V = R 2n. Fix a Euclidean norm and an orthogonal complex structure J on V. Identify ˆV with V using the pairing e i x,y, fix a deformation parameter h > 0 and consider the 2-cocycle Ω h (x, y) = e ih 2 x,jy on ˆV = V. Consider the normal state ν h on B(L 2 (V )) defined by the function ξ h (x) = ( ) h n/2 e h 4 x 2. 2π We then have ν h (λ Ω h x ) = ν h (λ Ω h x ) = e h 4 x 2. It can be shown that the elements (T νh ι)α(a), for all a A, span a dense subspace A Ωh. S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 14 / 21

On the other hand, Rieffel defines a deformation A h of A by a h b = 1 (πh) 2n α x (a)α y (b)e 2i h x,jy dx dy V V for smooth a, b A A, where the integral is understood as an oscillatory integral. The norm is defined by first defining a norm on C0 (V ) h and then identifying (A, h ) with the subalgebra α(a ) M(C 0 (V ) h A). We have a canonical isomorphism C 0 (V ) h = C (V ; Ω h ), so A h and A Ωh can be considered as subalgebras of M(C (V ; Ω h ) A). Then A h = A Ωh. Furthermore, our favorite quantization map (T νh ι)α: A A Ωh coincides with the map Φ h : A A h, Φ h (a) = 1 (πh) n e 1 h x 2 α x (a)dx, studied by Waldmann and his collaborators. V S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 15 / 21

On the other hand, Rieffel defines a deformation A h of A by a h b = 1 (πh) 2n α x (a)α y (b)e 2i h x,jy dx dy V V for smooth a, b A A, where the integral is understood as an oscillatory integral. The norm is defined by first defining a norm on C0 (V ) h and then identifying (A, h ) with the subalgebra α(a ) M(C 0 (V ) h A). We have a canonical isomorphism C 0 (V ) h = C (V ; Ω h ), so A h and A Ωh can be considered as subalgebras of M(C (V ; Ω h ) A). Then A h = A Ωh. Furthermore, our favorite quantization map (T νh ι)α: A A Ωh coincides with the map Φ h : A A h, Φ h (a) = 1 (πh) n e 1 h x 2 α x (a)dx, studied by Waldmann and his collaborators. V S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 15 / 21

5. Consider the group G diffeomorphic to R 2n+2, with the group law (a, v, t)(a, v, t ) = (a + a, e a v + v, e 2a t + t + 1 2 e a ω 0 (v, v )), where ω 0 (v, v ) = n i=1 (v iv i+d v i+dv i ) is the standard symplectic form on R 2n. Bieliavsky and Gayral have shown that for every θ > 0 there exists a unitary cocycle Ω θ on the dual of G defined by Ω θ = K θ (x, y)λ x λ y dx dy, G G where { } 4 2i K θ (x, y) = A(x, y) exp S(x, y), (πθ) 2n+2 θ A(x, x ) = ( cosh(a) cosh(a ) cosh(a a ) ) n ( cosh(2a) cosh(2a ) cosh(2a 2a ) ) 1/2, S(x, x ) = sinh(2a)t sinh(2a )t + cosh(a) cosh(a )ω 0 (v, v ). S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 16 / 21

Deformed action Return to the general case. Assume the deformed quantum group G Ω is regular. Then the formula α Ω (x) = (W Ω ) 12(1 x)(w Ω ) 12 defines a continuous left action of G Ω on A Ω M(C r (Ĝ; Ω) A). The action α Ω might be well-defined without regularity assumptions. For example, we always have an action of G Ω on C 0 (G) Ω = C r (Ĝ; Ω). S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 17 / 21

Theorem Assume that G Ω is regular, the map x Ω 21 ˆα(x)Ω 21 defines a continuous action of (Ĝ Ω ) op on G α A and W Ω 1 M(C 0 (G Ω ) (G α A)). Then A Ω M(G α A), and this inclusion, together with C 0 (Ĝ Ω ) M(G α A), defines an isomorphism G α A = G Ω αω A Ω. For Hopf algebras this isomorphism was observed by Majid and others in the 90s. For abelian locally compact groups G and continuous cocycles on Ĝ it was first used by Kasprzak to define deformations of C -algebras. S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 18 / 21

Theorem Assume that G Ω is regular, the map x Ω 21 ˆα(x)Ω 21 defines a continuous action of (Ĝ Ω ) op on G α A and W Ω 1 M(C 0 (G Ω ) (G α A)). Then A Ω M(G α A), and this inclusion, together with C 0 (Ĝ Ω ) M(G α A), defines an isomorphism G α A = G Ω αω A Ω. For Hopf algebras this isomorphism was observed by Majid and others in the 90s. For abelian locally compact groups G and continuous cocycles on Ĝ it was first used by Kasprzak to define deformations of C -algebras. S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 18 / 21

Induced cocycles Assume G 1 is a closed quantum subgroup of G, so we have a normal unital injective -homomorphism ˆπ : L (Ĝ1) L (Ĝ) respecting comultiplications, and Ω 1 L (Ĝ 1 ) L (Ĝ 1 ) is a unitary dual 2-cocycle on G 1. We can induce it to a dual cocycle Ω on G, namely, define Ω = (ˆπ ˆπ)(Ω 1 ). Given a continuous action α of G on A, by restriction we get a continuous action α 1 of G 1 on A. We can then consider the deformations A Ω with respect to α and A Ω1 with respect to α 1. Theorem We have a canonical isomorphism A Ω = AΩ1. S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 19 / 21

Induced cocycles Assume G 1 is a closed quantum subgroup of G, so we have a normal unital injective -homomorphism ˆπ : L (Ĝ1) L (Ĝ) respecting comultiplications, and Ω 1 L (Ĝ 1 ) L (Ĝ 1 ) is a unitary dual 2-cocycle on G 1. We can induce it to a dual cocycle Ω on G, namely, define Ω = (ˆπ ˆπ)(Ω 1 ). Given a continuous action α of G on A, by restriction we get a continuous action α 1 of G 1 on A. We can then consider the deformations A Ω with respect to α and A Ω1 with respect to α 1. Theorem We have a canonical isomorphism A Ω = AΩ1. S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 19 / 21

Regular cocycles The right action by translations of G on C 0 (G) defines a continuous right action β : C 0 (G) Ω M(C 0 (G) Ω C 0 (G)). Definition We say that Ω is regular if C 0 (G) Ω β G is isomorphic to the algebra of compact operators on a Hilbert space. Easy cases of regularity: a) Ĝ is a genuine group; b) G is compact. If G is a group, regularity is closely related to the question whether the action of G on C 0 (G) Ω is proper in appropriate sense. S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 20 / 21

Regular cocycles The right action by translations of G on C 0 (G) defines a continuous right action β : C 0 (G) Ω M(C 0 (G) Ω C 0 (G)). Definition We say that Ω is regular if C 0 (G) Ω β G is isomorphic to the algebra of compact operators on a Hilbert space. Easy cases of regularity: a) Ĝ is a genuine group; b) G is compact. If G is a group, regularity is closely related to the question whether the action of G on C 0 (G) Ω is proper in appropriate sense. S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 20 / 21

Theorem Assume Ω is a regular cocycle. Then A Ω = [(T ν ι)α(a) ν K ] and K A Ω = Ĝ op ˆα,Ω G α A, and the last isomorphism maps K 1 onto Ĝ op ˆ op,ω C 0(Ĝ). If G is dual to a locally compact group Γ, then by the Packer-Raeburn stabilization trick we get K K A Ω = Γ Ad ρ Ω ˆα (K (ˆΓ α A)). This implies, for example, that if Γ satisfies the strong Baum-Connes conjecture and Ω is homotopic to the trivial cocycle, then A Ω is KK-equivalent to A. S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 21 / 21

Theorem Assume Ω is a regular cocycle. Then A Ω = [(T ν ι)α(a) ν K ] and K A Ω = Ĝ op ˆα,Ω G α A, and the last isomorphism maps K 1 onto Ĝ op ˆ op,ω C 0(Ĝ). If G is dual to a locally compact group Γ, then by the Packer-Raeburn stabilization trick we get K K A Ω = Γ Ad ρ Ω ˆα (K (ˆΓ α A)). This implies, for example, that if Γ satisfies the strong Baum-Connes conjecture and Ω is homotopic to the trivial cocycle, then A Ω is KK-equivalent to A. S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 21 / 21

Theorem Assume Ω is a regular cocycle. Then A Ω = [(T ν ι)α(a) ν K ] and K A Ω = Ĝ op ˆα,Ω G α A, and the last isomorphism maps K 1 onto Ĝ op ˆ op,ω C 0(Ĝ). If G is dual to a locally compact group Γ, then by the Packer-Raeburn stabilization trick we get K K A Ω = Γ Ad ρ Ω ˆα (K (ˆΓ α A)). This implies, for example, that if Γ satisfies the strong Baum-Connes conjecture and Ω is homotopic to the trivial cocycle, then A Ω is KK-equivalent to A. S. Neshveyev (UiO) Alba Iulia (AMS-RMS) June 29, 2013 21 / 21