φ µ = g µν φ ν. p µ = 1g 1 4 φ µg 1 4,

Similar documents
Geometry and Physics. Amer Iqbal. March 4, 2010

where P a is a projector to the eigenspace of A corresponding to a. 4. Time evolution of states is governed by the Schrödinger equation

Attempts at relativistic QM

The Dirac Equation. Topic 3 Spinors, Fermion Fields, Dirac Fields Lecture 13

Lecture A2. conformal field theory

Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanics and Geometry by Nicholas Mee of Trinity College, Cambridge. October 1989

The Klein-Gordon equation

Second quantization: where quantization and particles come from?

1 Mathematical preliminaries

The Dirac Field. Physics , Quantum Field Theory. October Michael Dine Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz

The Dirac-Ramond operator and vertex algebras

NONINTEGER FLUXES, DOLBEAULT COMPLEXES, AND SUPERSYMMETRIC QUANTUM MECHANICS. based on [ ] and [ ] Hannover, August 1, 2011

A Note On The Chern-Simons And Kodama Wavefunctions

t, H = 0, E = H E = 4πρ, H df = 0, δf = 4πJ.

Tutorial 5 Clifford Algebra and so(n)

Chern-Simons gauge theory The Chern-Simons (CS) gauge theory in three dimensions is defined by the action,

Lecture 8: 1-loop closed string vacuum amplitude

e θ 1 4 [σ 1,σ 2 ] = e i θ 2 σ 3

HIGHER SPIN PROBLEM IN FIELD THEORY

Lecture 10. The Dirac equation. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics

Introduction to supersymmetry

The quantum state as a vector

MILNOR SEMINAR: DIFFERENTIAL FORMS AND CHERN CLASSES

1 Quantum fields in Minkowski spacetime

Construction of spinors in various dimensions

Path integrals for fermions and supersymmetric quantum mechanics

3 Quantization of the Dirac equation

Quantum Field Theory

Quantum Field Theory

LSZ reduction for spin-1/2 particles

REVIEW REVIEW. A guess for a suitable initial state: Similarly, let s consider a final state: Summary of free theory:

Quantum Physics 2006/07

Modern Geometric Structures and Fields

Heisenberg-Euler effective lagrangians

Spectral action, scale anomaly. and the Higgs-Dilaton potential

SUSY Breaking in Gauge Theories

arxiv:gr-qc/ v1 11 Oct 1999

Lorentz-covariant spectrum of single-particle states and their field theory Physics 230A, Spring 2007, Hitoshi Murayama

Generalized complex geometry and topological sigma-models

221B Lecture Notes Quantum Field Theory II (Fermi Systems)

Quantum Field Theory

General-relativistic quantum theory of the electron

Physics 129 LECTURE 6 January 23, Particle Physics Symmetries (Perkins Chapter 3)

221B Lecture Notes Quantum Field Theory II (Fermi Systems)

Chern-Simons Theory and Its Applications. The 10 th Summer Institute for Theoretical Physics Ki-Myeong Lee

Quantum Theory and Group Representations

Classical field theory 2012 (NS-364B) Feynman propagator

The Klein-Gordon Equation Meets the Cauchy Horizon

Non-Relativistic Quantum Mechanics as a Gauge Theory

Lecture 4 - Relativistic wave equations. Relativistic wave equations must satisfy several general postulates. These are;

Chapter 2 The Group U(1) and its Representations

Disclaimer. [disclaimer]

The Dirac equation. L= i ψ(x)[ 1 2 2

Donoghue, Golowich, Holstein Chapter 4, 6

1 Infinite-Dimensional Vector Spaces

GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION

Topological reduction of supersymmetric gauge theories and S-duality

Projektarbeit. Supersymmetric Landau-Ginzburg model

Physics 557 Lecture 5

th Aegean Summer School / Paros Minás Tsoukalás (CECs-Valdivia)

Lecture I: Constrained Hamiltonian systems

Spontaneous breaking of supersymmetry

Extending the 4 4 Darbyshire Operator Using n-dimensional Dirac Matrices

Quantum Fields in Curved Spacetime

1 Quantum field theory and Green s function

3 Symmetry Protected Topological Phase

Lecture 5. Hartree-Fock Theory. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics

2 Canonical quantization

The 3 dimensional Schrödinger Equation

Properties of the boundary rg flow

RIEMANN-ROCH, HEAT KERNELS, AND SUPERSYMMETRY

Pion Lifetime. A. George January 18, 2012

129 Lecture Notes More on Dirac Equation

4 Matrix product states

Quantization of scalar fields

Generalized N = 1 orientifold compactifications

Physics 772 Peskin and Schroeder Problem 3.4.! R R (!,! ) = 1 ı!!

Quantum mechanics in one hour

PHY 396 K. Problem set #5. Due October 9, 2008.

Index theory on manifolds with corners: Generalized Gauss-Bonnet formulas

Symmetries, Groups Theory and Lie Algebras in Physics

SECOND QUANTIZATION. Lecture notes with course Quantum Theory

k=0 /D : S + S /D = K 1 2 (3.5) consistently with the relation (1.75) and the Riemann-Roch-Hirzebruch-Atiyah-Singer index formula

Finite temperature form factors in the free Majorana theory

The Hamiltonian operator and states

The Spectral Action and the Standard Model

Integrable Spin Systems From Four Dimensions

Quantum Field Theory III

Week 11 Reading material from the books

Mathematical Research Letters 2, (1995) A VANISHING THEOREM FOR SEIBERG-WITTEN INVARIANTS. Shuguang Wang

Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom

Dirac Equation. Chapter 1

NILPOTENT QUANTUM MECHANICS AND SUSY

Quantization of Scalar Field

Geometric Quantization

The Dirac Propagator From Pseudoclassical Mechanics

Abelian and non-abelian Hopfions in all odd dimensions

GRAPH QUANTUM MECHANICS

Einstein-Hilbert action on Connes-Landi noncommutative manifolds

Relativistic Waves and Quantum Fields

Transcription:

Lecture 8 supersymmetry and index theorems bosonic sigma model Let us consider a dynamical system describing a motion of a particle in a Riemannian manifold M. The motion is a map φ : R M. By choosing coordinates (φ µ ) µ=1,...,n on M, we can write the Lagrangian, L = 1 2 g µν(φ) φ µ φν, where g µν is the metric on M and φ = dφ/dt. Note that this is independent of the choice of coordinates. The momentum conjugate to φ µ is given by p µ = L φ µ = g µν φ ν. The Hamiltonian is then, H = p µ φµ L = 1 2 gµν p µ p ν. To quantize this system, we consider the Hilbert space consisting of square integrable functions Ψ(φ) over M. We can then define the inner product, (Ψ 1,Ψ 2 ) = d n φ g Ψ 1 Ψ 2. The multiplication of the coordinates φ µ defines hermitian operators. We can also define the momentum components p µ as hermitian operators as so that p µ = 1g 1 4 φ µg 1 4, [φ µ,p ν ] = 1δ µ ν. Similarly, there is some operator ordering ambiguity in defining the quantum version of the H. Requiring invariance under coordiante change, we use H = 1 ( 1 2 g φ µ g µν g ) φ ν. This is nothing but the (minus of) Laplace operator on M. The Hamiltonian H can be used to write the Schrödinger equation, which can be formally integrated as i t Ψ = HΨ, Ψ(t) = e ith Ψ(t = 0). 1

For our purpose, it is often convenient to analytically continue the time variable t to pure imaginary value t = iτ with τ R. Thus, Ψ(φ,τ) = e τh Ψ(φ,τ = 0). We can introduce the heat kernel G(φ 1,φ 2 ;τ) to express this as Ψ(φ 1,τ) = d n φ 2 G(φ 1,φ 2 ;τ)ψ(φ 2 ). The heat kernel obeys the Schrödinger equation (or more precisely the diffusion equation), with the initial condition, τ G = HG G(φ 1,φ 2 ;τ = 0) = δ(φ 1 φ 2 ). To understand the energy spectrum {ǫ 0,ǫ 1,...} of the Hamiltonian, it is useful if we can evaluate tre τh as it gives, tre τh = e τǫ i, where tr is over the Hilbert space (i.e. the space of square integrable functions over M). Using the heat kernel, we can write it as tre τh = d n φg(φ,φ;τ). i=0 In the Feynman path integral formulation of quantum mechanics, the heat kernel G(φ,φ ;τ) is expressed as ( τ ) G(φ 1,φ 2 ;τ) = Dφexp dτ L( φ(τ ),φ(τ )). φ(τ)=φ 1 ;φ(0)=φ 2 0 Combining this with the above expression for tre τh, we find that tre τh = Dφe τ 0 dτ L. supersymmetric sigma-model φ(τ)=φ(0) We introduce fermionic coordinates ψ µ for the tangent space T φ M at φ. The Lagrangian L = 1 ( ) 2 g µν φ 1 µ φν + 2 g µν ψ d µ dt ψν +Γ ν φ ρσ ρ ψ σ + 1 4 R µνρσψ µ ψ ν ψρ ψσ. (1) As I advertised earlier, the Hilbert space is the space of differential forms Ω(M) (we require them to be integrable with respect to the inner product on Ω(M)). The fermions obey the anti-commutation relations, {ψ µ,ψ ν } = 0, { ψ µ, ψ ν } = 0, {ψ µ, ψ ν } = g µν. 2

The vacuum 0 in the ferimion Fock space is annihilated by all the ψ s. We identify it as the 0-form. Other forms are generated by multiplying ψ s, as ψ µ 0, ψ µ ψν 0,... ThesuperchargesQ, Q areidentified with the exterior derivative operator dand its conjugate δ d, so that H = {Q, Q} gives the Laplace-Beltrami operator. Witten index Let F be the operator that counts the degree of forms. We can also call it as the fermion number. We can use it to define the fermion number parity ( 1) F, which gives +1 for bosonic states (even forms) and 1 for fermoinic states (odd forms). Note that ( 1) F Q = Q( 1) F and similarly for Q. Since Q and Q commute with H, it maps a bosonic energy eigenstate to a fermionic energy eigenstate and vice versa. Moreover, since H = {Q, Q}, the map is bijection (one-to-one and onto) for states with non-zero energies. The situation is different for states with H = 0; the numbers of bosonic and fermionic states may be different. The difference is called the Witten index. The Witten index is a convenient quantity since it is invariant under continous deformations of the system, provided that the spectrum does not contain continuous bands. For the supersymmetric sigma model we are discussing, the Witten index is given by tr( 1) F e βh = n ( 1) p b p = χ(m). p=0 Grassmannian integral Let us evaluate χ(m) using the Feynman path integral. To do so, we need to formulate the path integral for the fermionic variables ψ, ψ. This is done by introducing Grassmannian numbers. AGrassmanniannumberθ isnilpotent θ 2 = 0, andits integral isdefinedlikeadifferentiation, dθ1 = 0, dθθ = 1. More generally, if we have a function f(θ) = a+bθ, wehre a and b are ordinary numbers (since θ 2 = 0, the most general function is a linear function), we have dθf(θ) = b. A nice thing about this definition is that we can perform the integration by parts, dθ θ f(θ) = dθb = 0. Similarly, we an show that dθf(θ) θ g(θ) = ± [ ] dθ θ f(θ) g(θ), where the sign on the right-hand side depends on whether bθ = θb (choose +) or bθ = θb (choose ). 3

Question 1: For a bosonic variable x, achange of variables x y with x = f(y) transforms an integral as dxg(x) = dy f (y) G(f(y)). Show that, for a Grassmannian variable θ, a change of variables θ ρ with θ = f(ρ) gives dθg(θ) = dρ 1 f (ρ) G(f(ρ)). This definition fits well with the interpretation of the supersymmetric sigma-model in terms of differential forms. Consider the top form ω Ω n (M). We can write the integral of ω over M as, ω = d n φd n ψωµ1 µ 2...µ n (φ) ψ µ 1 ψµ2 ψ µn. M Question 2: Use the result of Question 1 to show that the right-hand side of the above is independent of the choice of coordinates φ µ. Gauss-Bonnet theorem Now we are ready to evaluate the Witten index tr( 1) F e βh using the Feynman path integral. As in the computation tre βh in the case of the bosonic sigma-model, we consider a sum over periodic paths, but now in TM not in M. It is important to note that we require periodic boundary condtion for ψ and ψ as τ τ + β because of the insertion of ( 1) F. To see this, let us look at the following quantity, tr( 1) F e βh Oψ(0) for some operator O. By using the cyclicity of the trace, we see that this is equal to tr( 1) F e βh ψ(β)o, where the minus sign comes from the exchange of ψ with ( 1) F. However, we should also note that O must be a fermionic operator otherwise the trace would vanish. Thus, we get an extra minus sign when we exchange ψ and O. The end result is that ψ(0) = ψ(β) in the trace. Now we are ready to evaluate the path integral, with periodic boundary conditions for both φ and ψ, ψ. The main idea is use of the fact that the answer is independent of β and look at the limit of β 0+. Define t = βτ keeping the periodicity of τ to be 1. Rescale ψ β 1/4 ψ, and we obtain, The action is then S = β = L = 1 2β 2g µν φ µ φν + 1 0 1 0 dτl 1 g µν ψµ 2β 3 2 [ 1 dτ 2β g µν φ µ φν + 1 g µν ψµ 2β 1 2 ( ) d dt ψν +Γ ν φ ρσ ρ ψ σ + 1 4β R µνρσψ µ ψ ν ψρ ψσ. ( ) d dt ψν +Γ ν φ ρσ ρ ψ σ + 1 ] 4 R µνρσψ µ ψ ν ψρ ψσ. (2) In the limit of β 0, the only configurations that can contribute to the path integral are are those with φ and ψ being constant since any non-constant configuration would make the action 4

infinite in the limit. Thus, the path integral reduces to an integral over constant φ and ψ as, d tr( 1) f e βh n φd n ψd n ψ = (2π) n/2 e 1 4 Rµνρσψµ ψ ν ψ ρ ψ σ. This would be 0 if n = dimm is odd. If n = 2m, we can evaluate the Grassmannian integral to find = ( 1)m 2 2m m!π m d n φ gǫ µ 1ν 1 µ mν n ǫ ρ 1σ 1 ρ mσ m R µ1 ν 1 ρ 1 σ 1 R µmν mρ mσ m. This gives a path integral proof of the Gauss-Bonnet theorem. Morse theory We can also turn on a potential h(φ) in a supersymmetric way, L = 1 h h gµν 2 φ µ φ ν 1 2 2 h φ µ φ νψµ ψ ν. In this case, the path integral localizes at teh minima of h/ φ 2, namely at h/ φ µ = 0. By using a scaling argument similar to the one in the above, we find tr( 1) F e βh = ( 1) #(negative eigenvalues of 2h). φ 0 : h(φ 0 )=0 In fact, to the leading order in the expansion, we find { } b p = dimh p h (M) = # φ 0 : = 0, #(negative eigenvalues) = p. φ µ This can be refined by incorporating instanton corrections. Dirac operator In the supersymmetric sigma-model discussed in the above, there are two supercharges Q and Q. We can reduce the amount of supersymmetry by half, by setting ψ = ψ. In this case, we have only Q = Q. The Lagrangian is simplified as L = 1 2 g µν φ 1 µ φν + 2 g µνψ µ D t ψ ν. The quantization gives the anti-commutatition relation, {ψ µ,ψ ν } = g µν. This is the Clifford algebra. It is known that the Clifford algebra has a unique non-trivial irreducible representation and that is the representation in terms of the Dirac matrices γ µ. Thus, the Hilbert space of this model is the space of spinor fields on M. In this case, Q = γ µ D µ. The Witten index in this case is called the Dirac genus. The sigma-model path integral shows that it is given by the  polynomial, ind(γ µ D µ ) = Â, 5 M

where  = m i=1 x i /2 sinh(x i /2), and x i are eigenvalues of the Riemann curvature (i = 1,...,m;dimM = 2m). Dolbeault index If M is a Kähler manifold, we can double the number of supercharges,,,,. The arithmetic genus of the manifold is defined by index( ) = q ( 1) q dimh (0,q) (M). The path integral computation is exactly the same as that for the Dirac genus, and it relates the index to the Todd class, td(m) = x i 1 e x. i i These index theorems are interesting in that they relate global quantitizes such as the Euler characteristic to integrals of curvatures (local quantities). 6