Chapter 5 Reliability of Systems

Similar documents
Chapter 9 Part II Maintainability

CHAPTER 10 RELIABILITY

Quiz #2 A Mighty Fine Review

EE 445 / 850: Final Examination

Engineering Risk Benefit Analysis

Modeling and Simulation of Communication Systems and Networks Chapter 1. Reliability

Chapter 5. System Reliability and Reliability Prediction.

Reliability Engineering I

Reliable Computing I

Chapter 7 Physical Reliability Models

Statistical Quality Control IE 3255 Spring 2005 Solution HomeWork #2

The random counting variable. Barbara Russo

Fundamentals of Reliability Engineering and Applications

Non-observable failure progression

Signal Handling & Processing

Chapter 18 Section 8.5 Fault Trees Analysis (FTA) Don t get caught out on a limb of your fault tree.

System Simulation Part II: Mathematical and Statistical Models Chapter 5: Statistical Models

IoT Network Quality/Reliability

Why fault tolerant system?

ELE 491 Senior Design Project Proposal

Chapter 15. System Reliability Concepts and Methods. William Q. Meeker and Luis A. Escobar Iowa State University and Louisiana State University

Markov Reliability and Availability Analysis. Markov Processes

Reliability of Safety-Critical Systems 5.1 Reliability Quantification with RBDs

Time-varying failure rate for system reliability analysis in large-scale railway risk assessment simulation

DESIGN OF PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULING MODEL FOR DETERIORATING SYSTEMS

Reliability and Availability Simulation. Krige Visser, Professor, University of Pretoria, South Africa

Reliability analysis of systems and lattice polynomial description

Concept of Reliability

(QALT): Data Analysis and Test Design

Chapter 6. a. Open Circuit. Only if both resistors fail open-circuit, i.e. they are in parallel.

QUESTION 6 (16 Marks) A continuous random variable X has a Weibull distribution if it has a probability distribution function given by

We are IntechOpen, the first native scientific publisher of Open Access books. International authors and editors. Our authors are among the TOP 1%

B.H. Far

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering. Fault Tolerant Computing ECE 655

Maintenance free operating period an alternative measure to MTBF and failure rate for specifying reliability?

System Simulation Part II: Mathematical and Statistical Models Chapter 5: Statistical Models

Slides 8: Statistical Models in Simulation

Quantitative evaluation of Dependability

Failure rate in the continuous sense. Figure. Exponential failure density functions [f(t)] 1

STAT 509 Section 3.4: Continuous Distributions. Probability distributions are used a bit differently for continuous r.v. s than for discrete r.v. s.

Monte Carlo Simulation for Reliability and Availability analyses

Computer Science, Informatik 4 Communication and Distributed Systems. Simulation. Discrete-Event System Simulation. Dr.

Chapter 5. Statistical Models in Simulations 5.1. Prof. Dr. Mesut Güneş Ch. 5 Statistical Models in Simulations

Math Spring Practice for the Second Exam.

Part 3: Fault-tolerance and Modeling

Module 4-2 Methods of Quantitative Reliability Analysis

Practical Applications of Reliability Theory

Cyber Physical Power Systems Power in Communications

Availability. M(t) = 1 - e -mt

SUPPLEMENT TO CHAPTER

Dependable Computer Systems

Chapter 2 - Survival Models

Chapter Learning Objectives. Probability Distributions and Probability Density Functions. Continuous Random Variables

The exponential distribution and the Poisson process

Reliability analysis of power systems EI2452. Lifetime analysis 7 May 2015

B.H. Far

MFE634. Reliability Analysis. Group 5. Xiangyu Luo Ameya Palekar Krutin Parashuram Patil Chao Sa

Terminology and Concepts

STAT/MATH 395 A - PROBABILITY II UW Winter Quarter Moment functions. x r p X (x) (1) E[X r ] = x r f X (x) dx (2) (x E[X]) r p X (x) (3)

A Probability Primer. A random walk down a probabilistic path leading to some stochastic thoughts on chance events and uncertain outcomes.

Semiconductor Technologies

Variability within multi-component systems. Bayesian inference in probabilistic risk assessment The current state of the art

MAS113 Introduction to Probability and Statistics. Proofs of theorems

COMPARISON OF RELATIVE RISK FUNCTIONS OF THE RAYLEIGH DISTRIBUTION UNDER TYPE-II CENSORED SAMPLES: BAYESIAN APPROACH *

applications of integration 2

Chapter 2. 1 From Equation 2.10: P(A 1 F) ˆ P(A 1)P(F A 1 ) S i P(F A i )P(A i ) The denominator is

Combinational Techniques for Reliability Modeling

CHAPTER 3 ANALYSIS OF RELIABILITY AND PROBABILITY MEASURES

Fault-Tolerant Computing

1. Reliability and survival - basic concepts

b. ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 5. Independence: Two events (A & B) are independent if one of the conditions listed below is satisfied; ( ) ( ) ( )

Maintenance Modeling and Optimization. J.J. Arts. Beta Working Paper series 526

MAS113 Introduction to Probability and Statistics. Proofs of theorems

CHAPTER 3 MATHEMATICAL AND SIMULATION TOOLS FOR MANET ANALYSIS

Transient Behavior of

Asymptotic Confidence Limits for a Repairable System with Standbys Subject to Switching Failures

Unit 10: Planning Life Tests

Reliability Analysis of Moog Ultrasonic Air Bubble Detectors

ECE 510 Lecture 6 Confidence Limits. Scott Johnson Glenn Shirley

Friis Transmission Equation and Radar Range Equation 8.1 Friis Transmission Equation

Slides 5: Random Number Extensions

Reliability of Technical Systems

A STUDY OF ASYMPTOTIC AVAILABILITY MODELING FOR A FAILURE AND A REPAIR RATES FOLLOWING A WEIBULL DISTRIBUTION

Chapter 9. Bootstrap Confidence Intervals. William Q. Meeker and Luis A. Escobar Iowa State University and Louisiana State University

Basics of Monte Carlo Simulations: practical exercises

CS 1538: Introduction to Simulation Homework 1

Estimation of reliability parameters from Experimental data (Parte 2) Prof. Enrico Zio

Parametric Failures in COTS Capacitors

Ching-Han Hsu, BMES, National Tsing Hua University c 2015 by Ching-Han Hsu, Ph.D., BMIR Lab. = a + b 2. b a. x a b a = 12

B.H. Far

Contents. Introduction Field Return Rate Estimation Process Used Parameters

Example: sending one bit of information across noisy channel. Effects of the noise: flip the bit with probability p.

System Reliability Simulation and Optimization by Component Reliability Allocation

Chapter 2. Poisson Processes. Prof. Shun-Ren Yang Department of Computer Science, National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan

Stat 475 Life Contingencies I. Chapter 2: Survival models

Software Reliability & Testing

Chapter 4 Parametric Families of Lifetime Distributions

Review of Probabilities and Basic Statistics

Lecture 7. Poisson and lifetime processes in risk analysis

3 Modeling Process Quality

Transcription:

Chapter 5 Reliability of Systems Hey! Can you tell us how to analyze complex systems? Serial Configuration Parallel Configuration Combined Series-Parallel C. Ebeling, Intro to Reliability & Maintainability Engineering, Chapter 5 2 nd ed. Waveland Press, Inc. Copyright 2010 1

Serial Configuration Reliability Block Diagram E 1 = the event, component 1 does not fail, and E 2 = the event, component 2 does not fail, then P{E 1 } = R 1 and P{E 2 } = R 2 where R 1 = the reliability of component 1, and R 2 = the reliability of component 2. Therefore assuming independence: R s = P{E 1 E 2 } = P{E 1 } P{E 2 } = R 1 R 2 Chapter 5 2

Multiple Components in Series Generalizing to n mutually independent components in series; R s (t) = R 1 (t) x R 2 (t) x... x R n (t) and R s (t) min {R 1 (t), R 2 (t),..., R n (t)} Chapter 5 3

Component Count vs. System Reliability Component Number of Components Reliability 10 100 1000.900.3487. 266x10-4. 1748x10-45.950.5987.00592. 5292x10-22.990.9044.3660. 443x10-4.999.9900.9048.3677 System Reliability Chapter 5 4

Constant Failure Rate Components n λi t n n - t - t R s(t) = R() t = i e = e i=1 = λi λs e i=1 i=1 where λ s = λ i n i=1 Chapter 5 5

Weibull Components R s(t) = n e F H G i=1 n F H t Iβi - = e i=1 θi K J t θi I K βi λ (t) = e - n β t I i HG θ i K J i=1 F e - L NM n i=1 β θ n β t I i HG θ i K J i=1 F i i F HG t θ i I K J β i -1 O QP = n F i t i H G β I -1 i i K J θ θ i=1 β Chapter 5 6

Components in Series - Example A communications satellite consists of the following components: Probability Shape Characteristic Component Distribution Parameter life Power unit Weibull 2.7 43,800 hr. Receiver Weibull 1.4 75,000 hr. Transmitter Weibull 1.8 68,000 hr. Antennae Exponential MTTF = 100,000 hr. Chapter 5 7

λ S () t Components in Series - Example 17.. 4. 8 27. t 14. t 18. t 1 43800, 43800, 75000, 75000, 68000, 68000, 100000, = F H G I K J + F H G I K J + F H G I K J + R () t e e e e s 27. 1.4 1.8 t t t t 43, 800 75, 000 68, 000 100, 000 = F H G I K J F H G I K J F H G I K J 17, 520 27. 1.4 1.8 17, 520 17, 520 F H G I K J F H G I K J F H G I K J 17, 520 R (, ) 43, 800 75, 000 68, 000 100, 000 s 17 520 = e e e e =. 62 Chapter 5 8

Class Exercise The failure distribution of the main landing gear of a commercial airliner is Weibull with a shape parameter of 1.6 and a characteristic life of 10,000 landings. The nose gear also has a Weibull distribution with a shape parameter of.90 and a characteristic life of 15000 landings. What is the reliability of the landing gear system if the system is to be overhauled after 1000 landings? Chapter 5 9

Class Exercise - solution 1000 1000, 15, 000 10 000 R( 1000) e e 1.6. 9 (. 975) (. 916). 893 = F H G I K J F H G I K J = = Animated Chapter 5 10

Parallel Configuration R s =P{E1 E2} = 1 - P{(E1 E2) c } R 1 R 2 =1-P{E1 c E2 c } =1-P{E1 c }P{E2 c } = 1 - (1-R 1 ) (1-R 2 ) R n where E1 = event, component 1 does not fail E2 = event, component 2 does not fail, and Pr{E1} = R 1 and Pr{E2} = R 2 The probability at least one component does not fail! Chapter 5 11

Parallel Configuration - Generalization R s n i= 1 [ R ] i (t) = 1-1- (t) R s (t) >= max {R 1 (t), R 2 (t),, R n (t)} Animated Chapter 5 12

Parallel Configuration - CFR Model R s n (t) = 1-1- - it e λ i= 1 Chapter 5 13

For n = 2: s Parallel Configuration 2-component CFR Model n - λ t s 1 i= 1 1- e i R (t) = - -λ t -λ t R (t) = 1 - (1 - e 1 )(1 - e 2 ) -λ t -λ t -( λ + λ )t = e + e - e 1 2 1 2 z z z z -λ1t -λ 2t -( λ MTTF = R (t)dt = e dt + e dt - 1+ λ 2 )t e dt 0 s 0 0 0 = 1 + 1 1 - λ 1 λ + 2 λ1 λ2 Chapter 5 14

Parallel Configuration - Weibull Model L i n t 1 1 s i= 1 N M F O P H G I Β K J θ Q R (t) = - - e i If n identical Weibull components are in parallel: R (t) = - s L NM t 1 1 F H G I Β K J θ - e O QP n Chapter 5 15

Parallel Configuration - Example A circuit breaker has a Weibull failure distribution (against a power surge) with beta equal to.75 and a characteristic life of 12 years. 1 12 F H G I K J. 75 R() 1 = e =. 856 Determine the one year reliability if two identical circuit breakers are redundant. Chapter 5 16

Parallel Configuration Example Solution Two redundant breakers have a reliability function of: Rt () L = 1 NM 1 e F t H G I K J 12 O. 75 QP 2 L = NM F 1 H G I K J O. 75 P Q 12 2 R() 1 1 1 e P = 1 ( 1. 856) =. 979 2 Question: how are two redundant circuit breakers physically configured? Chapter 5 17

Combined Series - Parallel Systems R 1 R 2 R 3 R 6 R 4 R 5 Chapter 5 18

Combined Series - Parallel Systems A B R 1 R 2 R 3 R 6 C R 4 R 5 Chapter 5 19

Combined Series - Parallel Systems A R 1 R 2 R A = [ 1 - (1 - R 1 ) (1 - R 2 )] Chapter 5 20

Combined Series - Parallel Systems A R A = [ 1 - (1 - R 1 ) (1 - R 2 )] R 1 R 2 A B R 1 R B = R A R 3 R 3 R 2 Chapter 5 21

Combined Series - Parallel Systems C R C = R 4 R 5 R 4 R 5 R B R 6 R C R s = [1 - (1 - R B ) (1 - R c ) ] R 6 Chapter 5 22

High Level Redundancy R high = 1 - (1-R 2 ) 2 = 1 - [1-2 R 2 +R 4 ] = 2R 2 -R 4 Animated Chapter 5 23

Low Level Redundancy R LOW = [1-(1-R) 2 ] 2 = [1-(1-2R+R 2 )] 2 = (2R-R 2 ) 2 Chapter 5 24

High vs Low Level Redundancy R low -R high =(2R-R 2 ) 2 -(2R 2 -R 4 ) =R 2 (2-R) 2 -R 2 (2 - R 2 ) =R 2 [4-4R+R 2-2+R 2 ] =2R 2 [R 2-2R+1]=2R 2 (R - 1) 2 0 Chapter 5 25

k-out-of-n Redundancy Let n = the number of redundant, identical and independent components each having a reliability of R. Let X = a random variable, the number of components (out of n components) operating. Then F n Pr{ X = x} = P(x) = H G I K J R x(1- R ) x n-x If k (<= n) components must operate for the system to operate: R = s N x = K P(x) Chapter 5 26

k-out-of-n Redundancy Exponential Distribution R (t) = s N N - xt x=k F H G I K J λ 1 -λt x e -e N-x z MTTF = R (t)dt = 1 N 1 0 s x=k λ x Chapter 5 27

A Very Good Example Out of the 12 identical AC generators on the C-5 aircraft, at least 9 of them must be operating in order for the aircraft to complete its mission. Failures are known to follow an exponential distribution with a mean of 100 operating hours. What is the reliability of the generator system over a 10 hour mission? Find the MTTF. Chapter 5 28

A Very Good Solution Let T i = time to failure of the i th generator 10/100 Pr{ Ti 10} = e =.9048 R 12.9048 x [ 1.9048 ] 12 -x (t) = - =.9782 x 12 s x= 9 M TTF 12 1 = 100 = 38.53 hours x x = 9 Chapter 5 29

Complex Configurations a. linked network: A B E C D Chapter 5 30

Decomposition Approach (b) Component E does not fail, R E : A C B D R (b) = [1-(1-R A )(1-R B )][1-(1-R C )(1-R D )] Chapter 5 31

Decomposition Approach (c ) Component E fails (1-R E ): A C B D R (c) = 1-(1-R A R C ) (1-R B R D ) Chapter 5 32

Decomposition Approach R S = R E R (b) + (1 - R E ) R (c ) if R A = R B =.9, R C = R D =.95, and R E =.80, then R (b) = [1-(1-.9) 2 ] [1-(1-.95) 2 ] =.99 x.9975 =.9875 R (c ) = 1 - [1-(.9) (.95)] 2 =.978975 R s =.8 (.9875) + (1-.8) (.978975) =.9858 Chapter 5 33

Enumeration Method S = success; F = failure A B C D E System Probability S S S S S S.58482 F S S S S S.06498 S F S S S S.06498 S S F S S S.03078 S S S F S S.03078 S S S S F S.146205 F F S S S F S F F S S S.00342 S S F F S F S S S F F S.007695 TOTAL.9858 Chapter 5 34

Example Automotive Braking System WC1 BP1 M C WC2 WC3 WC4 BP2 BP3 BP4 Chapter 5 35

WC1 BP1 M C WC2 WC3 BP2 BP3 Case I. BP3 fails and BP4 is operational. 1. P I = [1 - R(BP)] R(BP) 2. R f = R(M){1 - [1 - R(WC) R(BP)] 2 [1 - R(WC)]}. 3. R{mechanical} = R(C) 4. These two subsystems operate in parallel, therefore, R I =1-[1-R f ] [1 - R(C)]. Case II. BP4 fails and BP3 is operational. Then P II = P I and R II = R I (by symmetry of the network and assuming identical reliabilities) WC4 Chapter 5 36

WC1 BP1 WC2 BP2 M WC3 BP3 Case III. BP3 and BP4 have failed. C WC4 BP4 1. P III = [1 - R(BP)] 2 2. Cable system has failed. 3. R III = R(M) {1 - [1 - R(WC) R(BP)] 2 } Chapter 5 37

WC1 BP1 WC2 BP2 M WC3 C WC4 Case IV. Both BP3 and BP4 are operational. 1. P IV = [R(BP)] 2 2. R f = R(M){1 - [1 - R(WC) R(BP)]2 [1 - R(WC)]2}. 3. R{cable system} = R(C) 4. R IV = 1 - [1 - Rf] [1 - R(C)] The overall system reliability can now be found from: R S =P I R I +P II R II +P III R III +P IV R IV Chapter 5 38

A Common Everyday Reliability Block Diagram to Solve R A =.8 R D =.95 R E =.7 R B =.9 R C =.9 R F =.8 Help! Where can I find a common everyday reliability block diagram? Chapter 5 39

A Common Everyday Reliability Block Diagram solved R A =.8 R D =.95 R E =.7 R B =.9 R C =.9.81 R F =.8 1-(1-.7)(1-.8) =.94 1-(1-.8)(1-.81) =.962 R s = (.962) (.95) (.94) =.859066

Summary Series Configuration Parallel Configuration Combined Series-Parallel Configuration High / Low Level Redundancy K out-of-n Redundancy Complex Configurations linked networks Chapter 5 41