IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet

Similar documents
EFFICACY OF TERRACYTE PRO ON LIVERWORT

IR-4 ORNAMENTAL DATA REPORTING FORM

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet

Southern Illinois University. General Trial Information. Trial Location. Personnel. Pest Description. Maintenance.

FN15Nostoc. Objective: to determine the effectiveness of different herbicides on Nostoc in gravel in container nurseries.

Southern Illinois University Plexus with Fomesafen Herbicides.

Liverwort Control in Containerized Ornamentals.

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Trial Report

Evaluation of Quinoclamine and Diuron for Postemergence Control of Liverwort (c)

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Form

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Form

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Form

The Safety and Efficacy of Slow Release Diuron.

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Liverwort Efficacy Study Authors: Kathleen Hester, Ely Vea, and Cristi L. Palmer Date: May 20, 2011

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet

YELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL IN ONION AFTER THREE YEARS OF CORN HERBICIDES

Liverwort Control in Nurseries

Soybean Agronomy and Host Plant Resistance Beaumont, TX 2009

3. Potato / HARS / CPB Systemic Trial

University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension Service

Smart Water Application Technologies (SWAT)

MISSISSIPPI SOYBEAN PROMOTION BOARD PROJECT NO FINAL REPORT

Evaluation of Contact and Residual Activity of Selected Insecticides for Control of Rice Stink Bug. Beaumont, TX

EARLY POST-EMERGENT CONTROL OF SMOOTH CRABGRASS AND THIN PASPALUM WITH TANK-MIXES OF VARIOUS HERBICIDES.

those in Arizona. This period would extend through the fall equinox (September 23, 1993). Thus, pending variation due to cloudiness, total light flux

2006 Concise TM Efficacy Trial on Petunia and Marigold. Dr. James Gibson University of Florida WFREC Milton, Florida

Trial 1: Weed control in established grapes

Evaluation of Herbicide Carryover Sub-Surface Drip Irrigated Tomato. Kurt Hembree and Tom Turini Farm Advisors, UCCE Fresno County

Site Information William H. Daniel Research and Diagnostic Center Starks-Fincastle silt loam Soil ph: 7.2. Preemergent and 1 to 2 tiller

YELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL IN CORN AND DRY BEAN CROPS

Controlling Sedges in Landscape Plantings. Joseph C. Neal, Extension Specialist, Weed Management Department of Horticultural Science

Range Cattle Research and Education Center January CLIMATOLOGICAL REPORT 2012 Range Cattle Research and Education Center.

CLIMATOLOGICAL REPORT 2002

EVALUATiON OF YUKON HERBICIDE RATES FOR YELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL IN CORN GROWN IN ROTATIONS FOLLOWED BY ONION

ALS-Resistant Kochia Management in a Corn - Sugarbeet Rotation 2005 to 2006 and 2007 to Robert Wilson

Alion, Sencor, and Sharpen for Preemergence Kochia Control in an Abandoned Alfalfa Field

DICAMBA 2018: HOPE MEETS REALITY

Second year harvest. AGRONOVA-field trials

temperature. March ended unseasonably warm but was followed by an extended cold

Evaluation of Chlormequat and Daminozide Products on Greenhouse Crops

Center for Applied Horticultural Research (CfAHR) Research Report. Lucia Villavicencio 1. Prepared for: Fine Americas, Inc.

Range Cattle Research and Education Center January CLIMATOLOGICAL REPORT 2016 Range Cattle Research and Education Center.

EFFECTS OF HEATING AND FREEZING ON TRANSLUCENT SCALE IN ONION BULBS

... SPRAY SYSTEMS FOR TURFGRASSES: CALIBRATING SPRAYERS AND MIXING PESTICIDES. C. L. Murdoch. RESEARCH EX;fEr1"SION SERIES 066

The Climate of Bryan County

Diagnosing Suspected Off-target Herbicide Damage to Grape

Evaluation of Insecticides for Control of Insect Pests in an MG VII Soybean Beaumont, TX 2009 Soybean Nursery North No. 4

2018 // Potato // HARS // CPB Systemic Trial Pg. 1

Soybean Insecticide Screening Test 1 Field north of TRIA house Beaumont, TX 2014 I II III IV

How to Maximize Preemergence Herbicide Performance for Summer Annual Weeds

2014 Ryan Lawn and Tree Overseeding Evaluation. University of Nebraska-Lincoln & Kansas State University. Zac Reicher, Jared Hoyle, and Matt Sousek

First year harvest. AGRONOVA-field trials

Effect of 1-MCP on Water Relations Parameters of Well-Watered and Water-Stressed Cotton Plants

The Climate of Marshall County

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Acetic Acid Crop Safety

Herbicide Drift: Cause, Effect on Crops, and Management. James L. Griffin School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil

Process Recommendations for Drift Reduction Technology Studies

Cultural practices improve color, size of Crimson Seedless. Nick Dokoozlian o Don Luvisi o Mike Moriyama o Peggy Schrader

PAGE #1 TRIAL # US 241/15/ : USPPWVAL* VC-2 11/12/2015 APPLICATIONS

PAGE #1 TRIAL # US 127/14/ : UCBAYSYS* AS /19/2014 APPLICATIONS

Vermont Soil Climate Analysis Network (SCAN) sites at Lye Brook and Mount Mansfield

The Climate of Kiowa County

The Climate of Payne County

The Climate of Murray County

Weeds, Weed Control and PGRs Ronald N. Calhoun and Aaron D. Hathaway Department of Crop and Soil Sciences Michigan State University

Trial Report: Slicing Cucumber Variety Evaluation Spring 2014

NURSERY GREENHOUSE FRUIT AND VEGETABLE PRODUCTION

YELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL IN LIBERTY AND ROUNDUP RESISTANT SUGAR BEETS

Creeping Bentgrass Phytotoxicity and Control Evaluation of Lawn Height Midnight Kentucky Bluegrass

T.W. Gannon and F. H. Yelverton North Carolina State University Department of Crop Science

The Climate of Grady County

Using Transline Herbicide to Control Invasive Plants

The Climate of Pontotoc County

Evaluation of Fall Application of Dual Magnum for Control of Yellow Nutsedge in Onions Grown on Muck Soils

Impact of Tobacco Thrips on Cowpea

Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459 modified) Hydromulch 2000 over Sandy Loam

Weed Control Studies in Onions Focus on 2007 Yellow Nutsedge Trials. Richard Smith Vegetable Crop and Weed Science Farm Advisor, Monterey County

PAGE #1 TRIAL # US 152/14/ : UCENLSYS* VC-2 11/19/2014 APPLICATIONS

Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459) East Coast Erosion Blanket ECC-2B, Double Net Coconut Fiber Blanket over Sandy Loam

The Climate of Seminole County

The Climate of Haskell County

2016 Cotton Defoliation and Harvest Aid Guide 1

2,4-D LV Ester 680. Herbicide PRODUCT SPECIFIC SPRAY DRIFT GUIDELINES APVMA PERMIT Adama PART 1 - PRELIMINARIES

Innovative Sustainable Technology

The Climate of Texas County

Sensing Strategies and Software Tools to Help Farmers Adapt to a Changing Climate

Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459 modified) Flexterra Ultra over Sandy Loam

West Henrico Co. - Glen Allen Weather Center N W. - Koontz

2014 Progress Report

Bermudagrass Off-type Assessment. consulting sales staffing support

% control June 2005 Aminopyralid Aminopyralid Aminopyralid Picloram

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE COMPLIANCE TEST REPORT

Flower Species as a Supplemental Source of Pollen for Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) in Late Summer Cropping Systems

Corey V. Ransom, Charles A. Rice, and Joey K. Ishida Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, OR, 2004.

Biology and Management of Amur honeysuckle (Lonicera maackii) R.J. Smeda, S.A. Riley

Weed Management Research Update

Jackson County 2013 Weather Data

AGRONOMIC POTENTIAL AND LIMITATIONS OF USING PRECIPITATED CALCIUM CARBONATE IN THE HIGH PLAINS

Avoiding Stink Bug Damage and Flat Pod Syndrome in Soybean with a MGVI Cultivar and Planting Date Beaumont, TX 2005

Transcription:

20110512d.pdf IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet Researcher(s) Ed/Ray Beste/Frank Affiliation: USDA-ARS Salisbury Facility 27664 Nanticoke Rd. Salisbury MD 21801 PhoneNumber: (410) 742-8788 Email: ebeste@umd.edu Trial: 2010 MD ProjectTitle: Liverwort Efficacy Protocol #: 10-003 PR# Research Target Crop/Plant Product EPA Reg. # Production Site Status 29643 Liverwort Boxwood, Japanese Scythe 53219-7 Greenhouse C Marchantia Buxus microphylla Pelargonic acid Dow AgroScie

Investigators (Name, Address, Phone#, e-mail, etc) Location of Trial TRIAL TYPE: (field, container, greenhouse, etc) C. Edward Beste J. Ray Frank U. of Maryland 6916 Boyers Mill Road LESREC Salisbury Facility New Market, MD 21774 27664 Nanticoke Road (301) 898-5332 Salisbury, MD 21801 jrayfrank@comcast.net (410) 742-8780 ebeste@umd.edu Marshalls' Riverbank Nurseries 27573 Pemberton Drive, Salisbury, MD (410) 677-0900 www.mrnurseries.com - PF-18 Hoophouse Field Container Chemical - Common Name Pelargonic Acid - Formulation 57%, 4.2 lb Pelargonic Acid/gal - Lot Number ------ - Product Scythe - EPA Registration Number 62719-529 - Manufacturer Dow Agrosciences LLC USE INFORMATION - Plant Common Name Littleleaf Boxwood - Plant Scientific Name Buxus microphylla Siebold & Zucc. v. 'Winter Gem' - Pest(s) / Pathogen(s) / Weed(s) Weeds Potting Mix: 75% Carolina Pine Bark and 25% Pacific Pine Bark (Aged) % Sand % Silt % Clay % OM ph -- -- -- Rooted Cuttings: Summer 2008 Emergence: N/A Transplanting: May 19,2009 Enter each SPACING for: Pot: Pot to Pot Rows: N/A Enter each SIZE for: Pot: 3 gallon (AMK 1200) Amerikan Plot: N/A Experimental Design: Randomized complete block with 2 sub samples per replication. Number of Reps: 5 reps (Total of 10 containers per treatment) Page 1 of 7

APPLICATION PARAMETERS 1 Application Type: Ground, directed spray under the plants onto the growing media surface in the pot. Number of One: The application of Scythe (57% pelargonic acid as 4.2 lb pelargonic acid/gal) Applications: was on March 5, 2010 Application Type: Backpack, CO2 propellant, one nozzle wand handheld, wand was bent to provide a vertical downward single nozzle which was moved around the plant to apply a hollow cone spray application onto the pot surface and under the plant foliage. The nozzle travel time to encircle the pot was 1 second per pass with two passes in 2 secs required for 100 gpa. Nozzle Type/Size: Hollow cone TXVS3 tip, SS, 80 degree spray angle, TeeJet brand, 100 mesh screen check valve strainers. Nozzle Pressure: 03-04-10: 23 psi measured (low side gauge of CO2 pressure regulator = 30 psi) Delivery Rate: 03-04-10: Spray boom discharge = 76 ml/30 sec. or 2.5 ml/sec. The pot surface area of a 10.25 inch diameter pot was 82.5 sq in. or 0.573 sq ft. An application volume of 100 gpa is equal to 8.69 ml/sq ft; therefore, 5.0 ml dilute spray solution applied to pot surface equaled 100 gpa. The nozzle tip was 4-5 inch height above the pot surface to apply a uniform treatment from the pot edge to the base of the plant (5 inch distance) in a one second pass time around the pot as two complete circular passes for a 2 sec discharge. Calibration Dates: 03-04-10: APPLICATION SUMMARY APPLICATION DATE RATES Growth Stage 03-05-2010, 11:20 11:25 am Air Temp: 42F RH = 53% Cloud cover: 100% Wind direction: none Because the application was made inside a white plastic film (translucent) covered bow house. Treatment No. 1: untreated Treatment No. 2: The test substance, Scythe 4.2 EC was measured as an aliquot of 50 ml and added to 1,000ml of water (5% v/v) and mixed. The concentration of Scythe product was 189ml /gal or 6.4 fl oz /gal. Application of the dilute solution at 100 gal/acre (378.5 liter/acre) broadcast 640 fl oz Tower product per acre (5 gal Scythe/A) or 21 lb pelargonic acid per acre. Surfactant or additive was not used. Treatment No. 3: None Treatment No. 4: None Leaf surfaces were dry. Spray dilutions prepared 03-05-10 NOTE: Irrigation of 0.5 inch was applied 4 days after treatment application. Boxwood plants were transplanted in May 2009 and had been pruned prior to application. Plants were dormant at the time of treatment. Pruned stems and leaves were removed from the growing media surface and liverwort growth was not disturbed. Liverwort gemma cups were developing on the plant surface. NOTE: Plastic cover was removed from the bow house on March 15, 2010. The study was irrigated three times with 0.5 inch water applied each time during the 24 day period from February19 to March 15, 2010. 1 RAINFALL/IRRIGATION RECORDS: The Salisbury Facility weather station is located 2 mile NNE of the study site. Irrigation was recorded at the study site. Irrigation and rainfall for the field container study are provided. The daily maximum and minimum temperatures and rainfall for the period of this study are also presented. Complete climatologic data on wind, dew, humidity, soil temperature and solar radiation are available. Page 2 of 7

Temperature and Rainfall Information February May 2010 University of Maryland - Salisbury Facility 27664 Nanticoke Road, Salisbury, MD 21801 February March April May DAY F Rain F Rain F Rain F Rain Min Max Inch Min Max Inch Min Max Inch Min Max Inch 1 3.386 37.99 0.11 34.12 48.33 0 39.64 72.7 0 60.78 86.7 0 2 11.08 40.35 0.19 31.17 41.9 0.25 43.54 69.28 0 69.71 85.3 0 3 28.23 40.33 0.16 33.21 38.98 0.38 43.53 71.5 0 69.71 81.2 0 4 24.56 37.56 0 34 45.39 0 48.88 76.7 0 61.38 82.6 0 5 26.66 36.64 0.45 32.92 46 0 46.78 80.6 0 51.41 83 0 6 16.61 33.27 1.22 29.97 48.8 0 55.06 86.9 0 62.64 86.6 0 7 13.38 29.15 0.41 30.04 55.9 0 66.28 87 0 51.17 76.3 0 8 15.73 31.27 0.02 28.11 58.41 0 67.12 80.7 0 58.73 84.9 0 9 8.08 40.76 0.59 29.6 63.75 0 48.22 68.45 0.69 46.48 61.72 0 10 20.39 34.89 0.26 35.37 66.22 0 37.84 61.96 0 39.04 62.07 0 11 25.76 37.62 0.03 48.56 63.05 0.04 45.9 72.5 0 38.93 59.38 0.1 12 22.57 36.3 0 44.48 52.23 1.27 45.76 71.1 0 50.43 79.2 0.03 13 23.66 31.02 0 45.75 52.17 1.05 41.75 57.23 0.1 48.71 65.79 0 14 20.23 39.2 0 42.26 55.54 0.03 36.09 61.89 0 52.84 83.5 0 15 12 41.84 0.01 41.19 46.6 0.27 36.82 69.05 0 55.84 76.6 0 16 25.56 36.14 0.01 35.55 58.83 0 54.17 84.3 0 54.59 73.4 0.01 17 24.98 35 0 31.89 64.95 0 44.02 68.32 0.01 50.75 62.1 0.24 18 30.26 42.92 0 32.61 67.42 0 34.72 56.2 0 49.36 55.53 1.26 19 32.55 43.23 0 33.7 70.6 0 39.4 63.81 0 50.26 66.76 0 20 27.97 44.31 0 41.39 75.3 0 36.4 67.3 0 48.82 77.5 0 21 29.43 48.49 0 49.19 73.1 0 47.09 62.93 0.07 50.39 85.3 0 22 29.72 42.92 0.09 49.78 64.72 0.06 48.58 70.4 0.01 57.34 77.1 0 23 35.12 39.76 0.43 45.33 53.37 0 48.71 69.52 0 57.99 75.4 0.52 24 31.94 44.25 0.19 44.14 63.69 0 42.94 66.28 0 54.15 76.3 0 25 31.22 40.53 0.14 40.18 72 0.01 51.28 74.8 0.29 55.71 76.9 0 26 30.93 37.29 0 38.19 58.55 0.88 50.66 60.28 0.13 51.71 85.2 0 27 32.19 44.07 0 30.09 46.23 0 45.81 64.72 0.08 56.62 85.4 0.22 28 28.77 43.54 0 30.87 62.13 0.06 35.55 58.01 0 56.68 75.5 0.28 29 3.386 37.99 0.11 48.01 57.89 1.96 40.66 67.66 0 61.32 79.1 0 30 11.08 40.35 0.19 42.21 51.22 0.16 46.42 78.8 0 62.25 86.4 0 31 44.81 67 0 62.62 89.1 0 Sum 4.31 6.42 1.38 2.66 Avg. 23.7 38.95 37.8 57.44 45.7 70.03 54.52 76.43 10 yr 27.9 46.2 35.3 55.5 44.7 66.4 52.7 74.2 Avg. 2.5 3.2 3.3 3.6 OBSERVATION TIME: MIDNIGHT TO MIDNIGHT Aspirated sensor for air temperature and humidity. Weather Station Location: N 38 22.474, W 075 39.461 Page 3 of 7

OTHER PESTICIDES, FERTILIZER, LIME AND ADJUVANTS USED: PRODUCT AMOUNT DATE 1) Slow Release fertilizer pellets 6 lb/cubic yard 5-18-09 2) lime, dolomitic, pulverized 5.5 lb./cubic yard 5-18-09 3) Rout Herbicide (oxyflurofen 2% + oryzalin 1%) 100 lb/a 5-22-09 4) Major and minor nutrients As needed Summer 5) No other pesticides were applied during the study. NARRATIVE SUMMARY OF METHODS AND RESULTS: A single spray application of Pelargonic Acid (4.2EC) Scythe was made under the foliage of Littleleaf Boxwood (Buxus microphylla Siebold. & Zucc v. 'Winter Gem') grown in field containers. The directed spray application of Scythe, 5%v/v dilution was made on March 5, 2010, using a CO 2 powered boom sprayer with a single nozzle. The percent weed cover in the untreated control containers was 70% Liverworts (Marchantia species). At the time of the application, containers treated at the X rate had 38% Liverwort cover. NOTE: The containers available to continue these studies had a reduced Liverwort population compared to the untreated control because all available containers had been selected for uniform high populations in the studies treated on February 19, 2010. Applications in this Study No. 12 were applied March 5, 2010 or 14 days after the previous nine studies. Therefore; Liverwort control is reported as the percent reduction of pot cover in the following discussion. The untreated control of 02-19-10 was used for this study. On March 10, 2010, five days after the application, the untreated control containers had a Liverwort cover of 69% which was a 1% decrease or unchanged; however, Scythe at the 5% v/v rate reduced Liverwort cover from 38% to 6% or an 84% reduction of Liverwort cover. At trial's end, April 28, 2010, the untreated control containers had 62% Liverwort cover which was an 11% reduction (54 days after treatment) probably due to increased sunlight and temperatures; whereas, Scythe at the X rate caused a 58% reduction of Liverwort cover. The increase in Liverwort cover from March 10 (6% cover) to April 28 (16% cover) indicated regrowth of Liverwort which did not occur with Scythe, 10%v/v in another 2010 study (Study 4) in Maryland. No significant phytotoxicity or differences in height x width were observed during the trial. No reduction in marketability of the Littleleaf Boxwoods was observed. Protocol Deviations: 1) Irrigation was not applied after Scythe applications as per the protocol, because the grower irrigation schedule was followed. GOOD RESEARCH PRACTICE STATEMENT: I acknowledge that I have read and followed the IR-4 Research protocol and completed this trial following good agricultural practice, or reported any deviations. SIGNATURE PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: Date Completed: October 5, 2010 Page 4 of 7

Figure 1: PR 29643A (Study No. 12) - Untreated control with Liverwort (Marchantia sp.) on the pot surface with Littleleaf Boxwood (Buxus microphylla Siebold & Zucc V.'Winter Gem'). Date: March 3, 2010 NOTE: A photograph of the treatment was not obtained. Page 5 of 7

IR-4 ORNAMENTAL DATA REPORTING FORM Study No. 12 - PR29643: LIVERWORT / Scythe Herbicide (pelargonic acid) Description PHYTO PHYTO PHYTO PHYTO PHYTO Height Width H X W Height Rating Date 3/3/10 3/10/10 3/17/10 3/31/10 4/28/10 2/19/10 2/19/10 2/19/10 4/28/10 Rating Unit 0-10** 0-10 0-10 0-10 0-10 cm*** cm sq cm cm Number of Subsamples 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 T1 Trt Treatment* Rate No. Name Rate Unit 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 Untreated Control 0 % v/v 1.3 b 1.8 a 1.7 b 1.3 a 0.9 a 18.8 a 21.2 a 400.9 a 21.8 a 2 Scythe (53% pelargonic acid) 5 % v/v 1.9 a 2.4 a 2.7 a 2.1 a 0.8 a 18.6 a 20.8 a 390.1 a 21.8 a LSD (P=.05) 0.52 0.68 0.98 1.04 0.52 1.13 2.54 30.62 3.59 Standard Deviation 0.30 0.39 0.56 0.59 0.30 0.64 1.44 17.44 2.05 CV 18.49 18.44 25.41 34.8 34.8 3.43 6.88 4.41 9.39 Bartlett's X2 0.017 0.154 2.687 0.017 0.656 0.139 5.908 0.812 0.253 P(Bartlett's X2) 0.897 0.695 0.101 0.897 0.418 0.709 0.015* 0.368 0.615 Replicate F 3.286 2.333 0.680 0.071 1.857 12.030 1.826 17.916 0.170 Replicate Prob(F) 0.1379 0.2160 0.6411 0.9873 0.2818 0.0168 0.2870 0.0081 0.9427 Treatment F 10.286 6.000 8.000 4.571 0.286 0.242 0.192 0.959 0.000 Treatment Prob(F) 0.0327 0.0705 0.0474 0.0993 0.6213 0.6483 0.6842 0.3830 1.0000 Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, Student-Newman-Keuls) Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL. * Spray Volume 100 gal per acre. Directed spray treatments were applied on March 5, 2010 **PHYTO Rating: The scale of 0 to 10 indicated foliar symptoms such as necrosis, chlorosis, abnormal growth or injury. On the rating scale, zero (0) indicated no effect on the plant and 10 rating indicated a dead plant. *** Plant size measurements were reported in cm width and height and the product of height X width as square centimeters for a two dimensional plant size. Description Width H X W Liverwort Liverwort Liverwort Liverwort Liverwort Rating Date 4/28/10 4/28/10 3/3/10 3/10/10 3/17/10 3/31/10 4/28/10 Rating Unit cm*** sq cm % cover 1 % cover % cover % cover % cover Number of Subsamples 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 T2 Trt Treatment* Rate No. Name Rate Unit 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 Untreated Control 0 % v/v 28.0 a 611 a 70 a 69 a 73 a 79 a 62 a Scythe (53% pelargonic 2 5 % v/v 28.0 a 608 a 38 b 6 b 8 b 11 b 16 b acid) LSD (P=.05) 4.50 156.3 11.3 6.8 6.0 9.9 18.4 Standard Deviation 2.56 89.0 6.4 3.9 3.4 5.6 10.5 CV 9.15 14.6 11.89 10.4 8.45 12.69 26.93 Bartlett's X2 0.0 0.048 0.828 0.355 1.595 1.187 2.883 P(Bartlett's X2). 0.827 0.363 0.551 0.207 0.276 0.09 Replicate F 1.019 0.479 0.091 2.333 4.243 2.922 0.983 Replicate Prob(F) 0.4929 0.7531 0.9803 0.2160 0.0952 0.1619 0.5064 Treatment F 0.000 0.003 62.061 672.042 899.514 362.667 47.955 Treatment Prob(F) 1.0000 0.9614 0.0014 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0023 Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, Student-Newman-Keuls) Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL. * Spray Volume 100 gal per acre. Directed spray treatments were applied on March 5, 2010 *** Plant size measurements were reported in cm width and height and the product of height X width as square centimeters for a two dimensional plant size. 1 Pot cover is the percent of the surface of the pot covered by Liverwort. : T1 = [C6]*[C7] and T2 = [C9]*[C10] Page 6 of 7

Study No. 12 - PR29643: LIVERWORT / Scythe Herbicide (pelargonic acid) Description PHYTO PHYTO PHYTO PHYTO PHYTO Height Width H X W Rating Date 3/3/10 3/10/10 3/17/10 3/31/10 4/28/10 2/19/10 2/19/10 2/19/10 Rating Unit 0-10 0-10 0-10 0-10 0-10 cm cm sq cm Number of Subsamples 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 T1 Trt Treatment Rate No. Name Rate Unit Plot 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 Untreated Control 0 % v/v 101 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.5 20.5 20.5 421.5 203 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 17.5 21.0 376.5 302 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 21.0 22.0 462.0 401 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.0 17.5 21.5 377.0 502 1.0 2.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 17.5 21.0 367.5 2 Scythe (53% pelargonic acid) Mean = 1.3 1.8 1.7 1.3 0.9 18.8 21.2 400.9 5 % v/v 102 1.5 2.0 2.0 1.5 0.5 20.0 21.0 421.0 201 2.5 2.0 2.0 2.5 0.5 18.0 20.0 359.0 303 1.5 2.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 20.0 24.0 488.0 402 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 16.5 21.5 353.5 503 2.0 3.0 3.5 2.5 1.0 18.5 17.5 329.0 Mean = 1.9 2.4 2.7 2.1 0.8 18.6 20.8 390.1 Description Height Width H X W Liverwort Liverwort Liverwort Liverwort Liverwort Rating Date 4/28/10 4/28/10 4/28/10 3/3/10 3/10/10 3/17/10 3/31/10 4/28/10 Rating Unit cm cm sq cm % cover % cover % cover % cover % cover Number of Subsamples 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 T2 Trt Treatment Rate No. Name Rate Unit Plot 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 Untreated Control 0 % v/v 101 23.0 28.5 643 70 65 70 70 55 203 21.5 29.0 634 70 70 70 80 70 302 24.0 27.5 662 70 70 70 80 63 401 21.0 31.0 651 75 65 75 78 60 502 19.5 24.0 468 65 75 78 85 63 2 Scythe (53% pelargonic acid) Mean = 21.8 28.0 611 70 69 73 79 62 5 % v/v 102 22.0 32.5 715 40 0 3 8 18 201 21.5 27.5 582 35 5 8 8 15 303 20.5 27.0 554 40 0 5 3 0 402 21.0 26.0 544 30 10 5 8 10 503 24.0 27.0 648 45 13 20 28 38 Mean = 21.8 28.0 608 38 6 8 11 16 T1 = [C6]*[C7] T2 = [C9]*[C10] Page 7 of 7