CE394k.3 - ArcGIS in Water Resources Term Project Update, Fall 2012

Similar documents
HYDROLOGIC AND WATER RESOURCES EVALUATIONS FOR SG. LUI WATERSHED

GAMINGRE 8/1/ of 7

Jackson County 2013 Weather Data

Jackson County 2018 Weather Data 67 Years of Weather Data Recorded at the UF/IFAS Marianna North Florida Research and Education Center

Jackson County 2014 Weather Data

Jackson County 2019 Weather Data 68 Years of Weather Data Recorded at the UF/IFAS Marianna North Florida Research and Education Center

Climate Change and Water Supply Research. Drought Response Workshop October 8, 2013

Climate Change Impact Assessment on Indian Water Resources. Ashvin Gosain, Sandhya Rao, Debajit Basu Ray

MEMORANDUM. Jerry Conrow, Ojai Basin Groundwater Management Agency

National Integrated Drought Information System. Southeast US Pilot for Apalachicola- Flint-Chattahoochee River Basin 20-March-2012

Modeling the Effects of Climate and Land Cover Change in the Stoney Brook Subbasin of the St. Louis River Watershed

National Integrated Drought Information System Southeast US Pilot for Apalachicola- Flint-Chattahoochee River Basin. 22 May 2012

Butte County Drought Task Force December 1, :00 AM noon 202 Mira Loma Drive, Tahoe Room Oroville, CA. Agenda

Chiang Rai Province CC Threat overview AAS1109 Mekong ARCC

REDWOOD VALLEY SUBAREA

Stream Discharge and the Water Budget

The Climate of Grady County

Webinar and Weekly Summary February 15th, 2011

February 10, Mr. Jeff Smith, Chairman Imperial Valley Water Authority E County Road 1000 N Easton, IL Dear Chairman Smith:

2 Precipitation and Evaporation

Sierra Weather and Climate Update

FORECAST-BASED OPERATIONS AT FOLSOM DAM AND LAKE

PRELIMINARY DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES

What is the difference between Weather and Climate?

Variability of Reference Evapotranspiration Across Nebraska

WYANDOTTE MUNICIPAL SERVICES COMMUNITY WIND ENERGY PROJECT WIND RESOUCE SUMMARY

United States Climate

Science Standard 1: Students analyze monthly precipitation and temperature records, displayed in bar charts, collected in metric units (mm).

The Climate of Payne County

The Climate of Kiowa County

2003 Water Year Wrap-Up and Look Ahead

2 Groundwater Basin Monitoring

Winter Season Resource Adequacy Analysis Status Report

3.0 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY

San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Hydrological Conditions Report For April 2014

The Climate of Bryan County

Geostatistical Analysis of Rainfall Temperature and Evaporation Data of Owerri for Ten Years

Supplementary appendix

WHEN IS IT EVER GOING TO RAIN? Table of Average Annual Rainfall and Rainfall For Selected Arizona Cities

The Climate of Pontotoc County

SYSTEM BRIEF DAILY SUMMARY

2 Precipitation and Evaporation

Disentangling Impacts of Climate & Land Use Changes on the Quantity & Quality of River Flows in Southern Ontario

Bushkill Creek 3 rd Street Dam Removal Analysis

The Climate of Seminole County

How are adding integers and subtracting integers related? Work with a partner. Use integer counters to find 4 2. Remove 2 positive counters.

Table 1 - Infiltration Rates

Chapter-3 GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION, CLIMATE AND SOIL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE STUDY SITE

Effects of climate change on landslide frequencies in landslide prone districts in Sri Lanka; Overview

Lower Tuolumne River Accretion (La Grange to Modesto) Estimated daily flows ( ) for the Operations Model Don Pedro Project Relicensing

The Climate of Marshall County

Attachment B to Technical Memorandum No.2. Operations Plan of Ross Valley Detention Basins

MONITORING THE EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON SPRINGS, SEEPS AND OTHER WATER NATIONAL PRESERVE

2015 Summer Readiness. Bulk Power Operations

2018 Annual Review of Availability Assessment Hours

2. PHYSICAL SETTING FINAL GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN. 2.1 Topography. 2.2 Climate

CAVE CLIMATE COMPARISON ACTIVITY BETWEEN THE SURFACE AND THE CAVERN

Climatography of the United States No

Finding Aid for the Collection of Material about the Southern Pacific Railway,

Weather History on the Bishop Paiute Reservation

Q3 10 Sales Tax Rate Report

SYSTEM BRIEF DAILY SUMMARY

Hydrogeology and Simulated Effects of Future Water Use and Drought in the North Fork Red River Alluvial Aquifer: Progress Report

Andrew Lee BEng (Hons) CEng MIStructE FGS FPWS

TILT, DAYLIGHT AND SEASONS WORKSHEET

Illinois State Water Survey Division

GLACIER AND SNOWMELT MODELLING USING SWAT: GANGA BASIN CASE STUDY. INRM Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Regents Earth Science Unit 7: Water Cycle and Climate

Climatography of the United States No

REPORT ON LABOUR FORECASTING FOR CONSTRUCTION

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

The Climate of Murray County

Outage Coordination and Business Practices

Local Ctimatotogical Data Summary White Hall, Illinois

San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Hydrological Conditions Report For March 2016

The Climate of Texas County

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

January 22, Coronado National Forest 300 West Congress Street Tucson, AZ Jim Upchurch, Forest Supervisor. Dear Mr.

Variability and trends in daily minimum and maximum temperatures and in diurnal temperature range in Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia

Investigating Factors that Influence Climate

Agricultural Science Climatology Semester 2, Anne Green / Richard Thompson

What Does It Take to Get Out of Drought?

Public Library Use and Economic Hard Times: Analysis of Recent Data

Integrating Weather Forecasts into Folsom Reservoir Operations

CAMARGO RANCH, llc. CRAIG BUFORD BufordResources.com

ENGINE SERIAL NUMBERS

Climate also has a large influence on how local ecosystems have evolved and how we interact with them.

Proposal to limit Namakan Lake to 1970 Upper Rule Curve for remainder of summer

Final Report. COMET Partner's Project. University of Texas at San Antonio

Changing Hydrology under a Changing Climate for a Coastal Plain Watershed

Long-term Precipitation Trends in Colorado. Nolan Doesken Colorado State Climatologist Presented: Friday, December 12, 2008

A Synoptic Climatology of Heavy Precipitation Events in California

The Climate of Haskell County

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Transcription:

CE394k.3 - ArcGIS in Water Resources Term Project Update, Fall 2012 Project Description: Prepared by Nick Brethorst October 29, 2012 ArcGIS Mapping of the Six Basins Watershed in, CA The Six Basins refers to the region of the cities of, La Verne, Pomona and Upland, and surrounding unincorporated areas of Los Angeles and San Bernardino counties within Southern California. This land mass overlies six interconnected groundwater basins. These basins include Canyon, Upper Heights, Lower Heights, Pomona, Live Oak, and Ganesha Basins. The Six Basins has member agencies that oversee the management of the groundwater within the basin and all have several monitoring and pumping wells. These member agencies include The City of Upland, The City of Pomona, The City of La Verne, Golden State Water Company, Pomona College, Pomona Valley Protection Agency, San Antonio Water Company, and Three Valleys Municipal Water District. Groundwater is beginning to play a much more important role in Southern California's water supply. No mapping of the Six Basins has been conducted using sophisticated programs like ArcGIS, and it would interesting to see how groundwater pumping affects the Six Basins. Project Objective The objective of this term project is to map the Six Basins using ArcGIS and try to determine how the groundwater basins are affected by groundwater pumping. Progress Made Data Collection and Compilation Locate and gather information on all of the pumping wells and static water level monitoring wells within the Six Basins. I spent the last two weeks mostly compiling all of the well information required to execute this project. I have successfully compiled all the important data required for the pumping wells and the static water level monitoring wells within the Six Basins for calendar year 2010. 2010 was the only year that provided a complete year's worth of data and will be used for the project. I have consulted Gonzalo Espinoza frequently to ensure that the data for the static pumping wells and static water level monitoring wells are in the proper format in Excel to upload into ArcGIS. Figure 1 provides a reference map that shows all of the general locations of the pumping wells and static monitoring wells. 1

Pumping Well Data Compilation Figure 1: Six Basins Map I compiled all of the pumping well data for all of the member agencies that pump within the Six Basins. Table 1 provides the member agencies and the number of active pumping wells they own and operate within the Six Basins. Table 1: Number of Active Wells within the Six Basins by Member Agency GSWC La Verne Pomona TVMWD Upland WECWC Number of Active Wells 15 7 10 1 10 6 The data compiled on a monthly basis for the pumping wells included the following: Well Name State Well Number Latitude and Longitude (Decimal Degree) Year and Month Well Ground Surface Elevation (ft) Depth to Well while pumping (ft) Depth to Well when not pumping (ft) Well Depth (ft) Upper Perforated Screen Depth (ft) 2

Lower Perforated Screen Depth (ft) Volume pumped (AF/month) Table 2 provides a snap shot of the pertinent data for one of La Verne's pumping wells by month in 2010. The excel sheets were too extensive to provide in this project update. Please see the attached excel sheets for more information on all the other wells. Table 2: Sample of Pumping Well Data Compiled Well_Name State_Well_ Latitude Longitude DTWPUM DTWS Well_Dept Upper_Screen Lower_Screen YYYYMM GSE_ft Number _degn _degw P_ft TAT_ft h_ft _Depth_ft _Depth_ft Volume_AF 3 34.121353-117.6797 201001 1545 400 365.0 701.0 450.0 690.0 66.2 3 34.121353-117.6797 201002 1545 407 382.0 701.0 450.0 690.0 30.6 3 34.121353-117.6797 201003 1545 414.5 393.4 701.0 450.0 690.0 50.9 3 34.121353-117.6797 201004 1545 422.3 400.1 701.0 450.0 690.0 48.1 3 34.121353-117.6797 201005 1545 430 406.0 701.0 450.0 690.0 64.7 3 34.121353-117.6797 201006 1545 436.6 409.3 701.0 450.0 690.0 62.2 3 34.121353-117.6797 201007 1545 441 412.0 701.0 450.0 690.0 52.6 3 34.121353-117.6797 201008 1545 435.4 420.4 701.0 450.0 690.0 50.2 3 34.121353-117.6797 201009 1545 416 446.0 701.0 450.0 690.0 46.5 3 34.121353-117.6797 201010 1545 435.4 420.4 701.0 450.0 690.0 50.6 3 34.121353-117.6797 201011 1545 446 425.6 701.0 450.0 690.0 47.0 3 34.121353-117.6797 201012 1545 422.4 406.5 701.0 450.0 690.0 46.2 Static Well Data Compilation I compiled all of the static groundwater elevation data for the eight monitoring wells within the Six Basins. The data compiled on a monthly basis included the following: Monitoring Well Name Radio Address Owner Latitude and Longitude (Decimal Degree) Well Ground Surface Elevation (ft) Year and Month Static Groundwater Elevation (ft) Well Address Well Depth (ft) Table 3 provides a snap shot of the pertinent data for one the eight monitoring wells by month in 2010. The Excel sheets were too extensive to provide in this project update. Please see the attached excel sheets for more information on all the other monitoring wells. 3

Table 3: Sample of Static Water Level Data Compiled Monitoring_Well Radio Address Owner Latitude _degn Longitude _degw GSE_ft YYYYMM Static_GW_Elev_ft Well_Address Well_ Depth_ft MW #1 81 Six Basins 34.14162587-117.6876145 1852.8 201001 1568.0 MW #1 81 Six Basins 34.14162587-117.6876145 1852.8 201002 1568.0 MW #1 81 Six Basins 34.14162587-117.6876145 1852.8 201003 1582.0 MW #1 81 Six Basins 34.14162587-117.6876145 1852.8 201004 1614.0 MW #1 81 Six Basins 34.14162587-117.6876145 1852.8 201005 1621.5 MW #1 81 Six Basins 34.14162587-117.6876145 1852.8 201006 1605.5 MW #1 81 Six Basins 34.14162587-117.6876145 1852.8 201007 1591.0 MW #1 81 Six Basins 34.14162587-117.6876145 1852.8 201008 1583.0 MW #1 81 Six Basins 34.14162587-117.6876145 1852.8 201009 1578.0 MW #1 81 Six Basins 34.14162587-117.6876145 1852.8 201010 1575.0 MW #1 81 Six Basins 34.14162587-117.6876145 1852.8 201011 1572.0 MW #1 81 Six Basins 34.14162587-117.6876145 1852.8 201012 1570.0 Geology and Soil Characteristics Boring logs of monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2, and MW-3 were created using AutoCAD and will be used to make a soil profile in ArcGIS. The boring log profiles are included in Figure 2. Figure 2: Boring Profiles of Monitoring Wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-3 4

A soil map that encompasses the Six Basins was found from the USGS Website, shown in Figure 3. The data will be used in ArcGIS to determine soil properties, statistics, and the operating safe yield of the basin. Precipitation Data Figure 3: Soil Characteristics surrounding the Six Basins Precipitation Data was gathered from Three Valleys Municipal Water District at the only rain gage in the Six Basins, located right next to Monitoring Well MW-3. Table 4 provides the precipitation data in the Six Basins. Table 4: Precipitation Data in the Six Basins at MW-3 Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total 2000 0.00 1.37 2.96 1.1 0.2 0.16 0.08 0.01 0.22 1.47 0.01 0.01 7.59 2001 4.55 7.44 0.78 1.48 0.03 0.03 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.04 1.22 0.33 15.97 2002 0.79 0.41 0.27 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 2.90 2.84 7.41 2003 0.01 4.70 4.17 1.18 1.32 0.11 0.06 0.01 0.01 0.20 1.21 1.93 14.91 2004 0.31 5.33 1.07 0.71 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.03 6.45 1.54 4.43 19.92 2005 7.41 9.69 2.21 0.84 0.40 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.38 1.17 0.00 1.24 23.39 2006 1.17 2.66 3.88 3.08 0.49 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.02 0.19 0.61 12.18 2007 0.10 0.10 0.19 0.92 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.26 0.37 1.23 1.42 4.67 2008 11.85 2.22 0.43 0.00 2.66 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.19 2.14 4.47 24.01 2009 0.45 7.04 0.44 0.52 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.44 0.85 5.60 16.53 2010 8.10 5.53 0.87 2.48 0.07 0.02 0 0.00 0.03 1.38 2.15 17.80 38.43 5

Digital Elevation Model A digital elevation model image has been uploaded in GIS. This model was created by merging two images together; one image that displayed the Los Angeles County side of the Six Basins, the second image that displayed the San Bernardino County side of the Six Basins. This will help delineate the Six Basins. The lowest point of the Six Basins is currently being determined to delineate the basin. Figure 4 provides the digital elevation model. Project Execution Steps Remaining Figure 4: Digital Elevation Model of the Six Basins The following steps still need to be taken to meet the Project Objective: Delineate the Six Basins and its six subwatersheds using ArcGIS and various sources. Upload the pumping well, monitoring well, boring data and precipitation data into ArcGIS Determine the operating safe yield (storage capacity) of the Six Basins. Determine the geology and soil characteristics within the Six Basins Determine the precipitation within in the Six Basins Create a cross sectional soil profile of the Six Basins Map and/or model the basin, if possible in ArcGIS, for the following scenarios and make comparisons: a) With pumping the aquifer. b) Without pumping the aquifer. 6