Dr. Karl-Remeis Sternwarte Bamberg Astronomical Institute of the Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics (ECAP) Ingo Kreykenbohm, Laura Barragán, Jörn Wilms, Richard. E. Rothschild, Slawomir Suchy, Katja Pottschmidt 2010 January 21
Contents 1 HMXB History Instruments Observation & Data 2 3 Results & Discussion Outlook
High Mass X-ray Binaries HMXB History Instruments Observation & Data two stars in orbit: early type star and compact object in this case: neutron star X-rays produced through accretion of the stellar wind accreted matter channeled by strong magnetic eld onto neutron star surface strong graviation, extreme magnetic elds, extreme physics! Illustration: ESA (C. Carreau)
Accretion column HMXB History Instruments Observation & Data Becker & Wol (2005)
Accretion column HMXB History Instruments Observation & Data Mészáros (1984)
History HMXB History Instruments Observation & Data Detection rst detected with Uhuru in 1974 (Giacconi et al., 1974) as 3U 1912+07 also known as X1908+075 4.4 d orbit detected with RXTE ASM in 2000 (Wen et al., 2000) 650 s pulse period detected with RXTE PCA (Levine et al., 2004) companion identied in infrared as OB star with M = 931 M (Morel & Grosdidier, 2005).
Orbital variation HMXB History Instruments Observation & Data 4U 1909+07 shows strong orbital variability the N H value rises by a factor of 3 explainable by standard wind models resulting inclination 54 i 70 Levine et al. (2004)
Hard X-ray Image HMXB History Instruments Observation & Data
HMXB History Instruments Observation & Data Rossi X-ray Explorer (RXTE) launched in Dec 1995 small mission with 3 instruments: Porpotional Chamber Array (PCA): 260 kev High Energy X-ray Experiment (HEXTE): 15250 kev All Sky Monitor (ASM): 2.510 kev no imaging capabilities, but high time resultion ( µs) HEXTE A B Rossi X-ray Explorer PCA (1 of 5) ASM
HMXB History Instruments Observation & Data INTEGRAL launched in Oct 2002 3 X-ray instruments: JEM-X: 335 kev IBIS with ISGRI and PICsIT: 15 kev 10 MeV SPI: 20 kev 8 MeV coded mask instruments, imaging of the hard X-ray sky
Data HMXB History Instruments Observation & Data RXTE only short observations in 2000 and longer observations in 2004 previously analyzed by Levine et al. (2004), but without phase resolved spectral analysis overall 180 ksec data with average countrate 50 cps INTEGRAL no pointed observation (yet) 4U 1909+07 lies in ISGRI's FoV when observing GRS 1915+105 6.6 Msec data with 2.4 cps used rst 100 days block for spectral analysis only
HMXB History Instruments Observation & Data Extraction RXTE using standard HEASARC software v. 6.6 extracted PCA lightcurves with 1 sec resolution extracted PCA and HEXTE spectra INTEGRAL using OSA 7.0 extraced ISGRI lightcurve with 20 sec resolution, using ii_light extracted ISGRI spectrum
3 days average lightcurve 5 Counrate 20 40keV [cps] 4 3 2 1 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Year
Pulse period search INTEGRAL data provides good sampling between 20032008 RXTE measurements in 2000 and 2003 stable pulse prole only after folding at least 500 pulses Cts/sec 10 0 10 20 30 6 10 4 6.1 10 4 6.2 10 4 6.3 10 4 6.4 10 4 6.5 10 4 6.6 10 4 Time in sec since MJD 52704
Pulse period evolution 605.0 604.8 604.6 Period [s] 604.4 604.2 604.0 603.8 603.6 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Year
Pulse period evolution 605.0 604.8 604.6 Period [s] 604.4 604.2 604.0 603.8 603.6 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Year
Pulse period evolution evolution could be torque reversal, as seen in 4U 1907+09 (Fritz et al., 2006) but also consistend with random walk Random Walk? easy test proposed by de Kool & Anzer (1993) plot pulse period evolution in log δω log δt space perfect random walk shows powerlaw with index 0.5
Pulse period evolution log δ ω [2π Hz] 6.5 6 5.5 5 6.5 7 7.5 log δ t [sec]
Pulseproles average 3.717 kev pulseprole shows two-peaked shape (Levine et al., 2004). pulses are separated by deep minimum Norm. Counts 0.8 1 1.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 Phase
Pulseproles Norm. Counts 0.8 1 1.2 2.9 3.7 kev 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Phase
Pulseproles Norm. Counts 0.8 1 1.2 3.7 4.5 kev 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Phase
Pulseproles Norm. Counts 0.8 1 1.2 4.5 5.3 kev 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Phase
Pulseproles Norm. Counts 0.8 1 1.2 5.7 6.6 kev 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Phase
Pulseproles Norm. Counts 0.8 1 1.2 6.6 7.8 kev 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Phase
Pulseproles Norm. Counts 0.8 1 1.2 8.2 9.5 kev 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Phase
Pulseproles Norm. Counts 0.8 1 1.2 9.9 11.1 kev 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Phase
Pulseproles Norm. Counts 0.8 1 1.2 11.6 12.8 kev 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Phase
Pulseproles Norm. Counts 0.8 1 1.2 13.2 14.5 kev 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Phase
Pulseproles Norm. Counts 0.8 1 1.2 14.9 16.2 kev 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Phase
Pulseproles Norm. Counts 1 1.5 2 INTEGRAL 20 40keV 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Phase
Landscape Pulseproles 50 Energy [kev] 20 10 5 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 Pulse phase 0.8 1
RXTE PCA, HEXTE, and INTEGRAL ISGRI t simultaneously cuto powerlaw with photoabsorption and iron line additionally black body to model soft excess no evidence for a Cyclotron Resonance Scattering Feature (CRSF) χ 2 1.01 for cutoffpl + red bbody χ norm. counts/sec/kev a) 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 10 5 4 b) 2 0 2 4 10 100 Channel Energy [kev]
Phase resolved spectrum phase resolved analysis only for RXTE data analysis performed in 7 phasebins χ 2 in all bins 1.4 red 1.8 Countrate [cps] 1.6 1.4 1.2 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Phase
Powerlaw parameters cps Γ E fold [kev] 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 20 18 16 14 12 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Phase
Soft components cps 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 N H A BB 10 3 kt [kev] 11 10 9 8 7 6 1.5 1.0 0.5 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Phase
Iron line cps σ Fe E Fe 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 6.55 6.50 6.45 6.40 6.35 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Phase
Results Results & Discussion Outlook Pulse period changes compatible with a random walk no stable accretion disk (Ghosh & Lamb, 1979) Spectra show no evidence for a CRSF strong magnetic eld still possible, as CRSFs can be missed due to various eects (Schönherr et al., 2007) Pulsed ux indicates strong magnetic eld
Results Results & Discussion Outlook Pulse proles shows two peaked structure orignating from the two magnetic poles? dierent spectral parameters in the two peaks dierent environment above the two poles?
Results Results & Discussion Outlook Maybe accretion column above one pole is colder and consequently can not Comptonize photons to hard X-rays change in E fold explainable
Outlook Results & Discussion Outlook archival Chandra data are currently analyzed more observations with dierent satellites necessary especially soft energy range to study the iron complex in the hard X-rays: more thorough search for CRSF Further reading: F. Fürst et al, Proceedings of the 2009 Fermi Symposium, astro-ph:0912.3702a and soon publication in A&A
Becker P.A., Wol M.T., 2005, Astrophys. J., Lett. 621, L45 de Kool M., Anzer U., 1993, MNRAS 262, 726 Fritz S., Kreykenbohm I., Wilms J., et al., 2006, A&A 458, 885 Ghosh P., Lamb F.K., 1979, ApJ 234, 296 Giacconi R., Murray S., Gursky H., et al., 1974, A&AS 27, 37 Levine A.M., Rappaport S., Remillard R., Savcheva A., 2004, ApJ 617, 1284 Mészáros P., 1984, Space Sci. Rev. 38, 325 Morel T., Grosdidier Y., 2005, MNRAS 356, 665 Schönherr G., Wilms J., Kretschmar P., et al., 2007, A&A 472, 353 Wen L., Remillard R.A., Bradt H.V., 2000, ApJ 532, 1119
1A 1118 1.1 1.0 1A1118 61 Normalized counts 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 XIS PIN 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Pulse Phase S. Suchy, priv. comm.