Asymptotic Safety in the ADM formalism of gravity Frank Saueressig Research Institute for Mathematics, Astrophysics and Particle Physics Radboud University Nijmegen J. Biemans, A. Platania and F. Saueressig, arxiv:1609.04813 J. Biemans, A. Platania and F. Saueressig, arxiv:1702.06539 W. Houthoff, A. Kurov and F. Saueressig, in preparation FRG2017 Heidelberg, March 10th, 2017 p. 1/33
p. 2/33 What s the name of the game? Goal: a consistent quantum field theory describing gravity on all scales
p. 3/33 What s the name of the game? Goal: a consistent quantum field theory describing gravity Nature on all scales
p. 4/33 Asymptotic Safety as a successful quantum theoy (for nature) a) non-gaussian fixed point (NGFP) controls the UV-behavior of the RG-trajectory ensures the absence of UV-divergences
p. 4/33 Asymptotic Safety as a successful quantum theoy (for nature) a) non-gaussian fixed point (NGFP) controls the UV-behavior of the RG-trajectory ensures the absence of UV-divergences b) NGFP has finite-dimensional UV-critical surface S UV fixing the position of a RG-trajectory in S UV experimental determination of relevant parameters required for predictivity
p. 4/33 Asymptotic Safety as a successful quantum theoy (for nature) a) non-gaussian fixed point (NGFP) controls the UV-behavior of the RG-trajectory ensures the absence of UV-divergences b) NGFP has finite-dimensional UV-critical surface S UV fixing the position of a RG-trajectory in S UV experimental determination of relevant parameters required for predictivity c) connection to observable low-energy physics: tests of general relativity (cosmological signatures,...) compatibility with standard model of particle physics at 1 TeV (light fermions, Yukawa couplings, Higgs potential,...)
p. 4/33 Asymptotic Safety as a successful quantum theoy (for nature) a) non-gaussian fixed point (NGFP) controls the UV-behavior of the RG-trajectory ensures the absence of UV-divergences b) NGFP has finite-dimensional UV-critical surface S UV fixing the position of a RG-trajectory in S UV experimental determination of relevant parameters required for predictivity c) connection to observable low-energy physics: tests of general relativity (cosmological signatures,...) compatibility with standard model of particle physics at 1 TeV (light fermions, Yukawa couplings, Higgs potential,...) d) structural demands: background independence, unitarity,... resolution of singularities: (black holes, Landau poles,...)
p. 5/33 The Asymptotic Safety sloganizer Gravity rules!
p. 5/33 The Asymptotic Safety sloganizer Gravity rules! Matter matters!
p. 5/33 The Asymptotic Safety sloganizer Gravity rules! Matter matters! Time matters!
p. 6/33 Perturbative quantization of General Relativity Dynamics of General Relativity governed by Einstein-Hilbert action S EH 1 = d 4 x g [ R+2Λ ] 16πG N Newton s constant G N has negative mass-dimension
p. 6/33 Perturbative quantization of General Relativity Dynamics of General Relativity governed by Einstein-Hilbert action S EH 1 = d 4 x g [ R+2Λ ] 16πG N Newton s constant G N has negative mass-dimension Wilsonian picture of perturbative renormalization: dimensionless coupling constant attracted to GFP (free theory) in UV introduce dimensionless coupling constants g 0.04 g k = k 2 G N, λ k Λk 2 GFP: flow governed by mass-dimension: k k g k =2g +O(g 2 ) k k λ k = 2λ+O(g) 0.02 GFP 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.04 Λ
p. 6/33 Perturbative quantization of General Relativity Dynamics of General Relativity governed by Einstein-Hilbert action S EH 1 = d 4 x g [ R+2Λ ] 16πG N Newton s constant G N has negative mass-dimension Wilsonian picture of perturbative renormalization: dimensionless coupling constant attracted to GFP (free theory) in UV introduce dimensionless coupling constants g 0.04 g k = k 2 G N, λ k Λk 2 GFP: flow governed by mass-dimension: k k g k =2g +O(g 2 ) k k λ k = 2λ+O(g) 0.02 GFP 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.04 Λ General Relativity is not asymptotically free
p. 7/33 Quantizing general relativity [M. H. Goroff and A. Sagnotti, Phys. Lett. B160 (1985) 81] [A. E. M. van de Ven, Nucl. Phys. B378 (1992) 309] quantizing the Einstein-Hilbert action S = 1 16πG d 4 x gr has a two-loop divergence = hallmark of perturbative non-renormalizability S div = 1 ǫ 209 2880 1 (16π 2 ) 2 d 4 x gc µν ρσ C ρσ αβ C αβ µν.
Quantizing general relativity [M. H. Goroff and A. Sagnotti, Phys. Lett. B160 (1985) 81] [A. E. M. van de Ven, Nucl. Phys. B378 (1992) 309] quantizing the Einstein-Hilbert action S = 1 16πG d 4 x gr has a two-loop divergence = hallmark of perturbative non-renormalizability S div = 1 ǫ 209 2880 1 (16π 2 ) 2 d 4 x gc µν ρσ C ρσ αβ C αβ µν. the Goroff-Sagnotti challenge mastered: Γ k = 1 16πG k [H. Gies, S. Lippholdt, B. Knorr, F.S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 211302] d 4 x g ( R+2Λ k )+ σ k d 4 x gc µν ρσ C ρσ αβ C αβ µν +... possess a NGFP with two relevant directions: NGFP GS : λ = 0.193, g = 0.707, σ = 0.305 θ 1,2 = 1.475±3.043i, θ 3 = 79.39. p. 7/33
p. 8/33 renormalization group flows in the presence of a foliation
p. 9/33 Technical routes towards asymptotic safety starting point: path integral over metrics Z = Dĝe S[ĝ] FRGE t Γ k [h µν ;ḡ µν ] = 1 2 STr [ ( Γ (2) k +R k ) 1 t R k ] linear split: ĝ µν = ḡ µν +h µν exponential split: ĝ µν = ḡ µρ [ e h ] ρ ν
Technical routes towards asymptotic safety starting point: path integral over metrics Z = Dĝe S[ĝ] FRGE t Γ k [h µν ;ḡ µν ] = 1 2 STr [ ( Γ (2) k +R k ) 1 t R k ] linear split: ĝ µν = ḡ µν +h µν exponential split: ĝ µν = ḡ µρ [ e h ] ρ ν Euclidean Dynamical Triangulations (EDT) Z = triangulations (detĝ) β e SEH [ĝ] Causal Dynamical Triangulations (CDT) Z = causal triangulations e SEH [ĝ] p. 9/33
p. 10/33 A fundamental puzzle FRGE: existence of NGFP well-established extension to gravity-matter models possible Causal Dynamical Triangulations (CDT): phase diagram contains 2nd order phase transition = possible continuum limit Euclidean Dynamical Triangulations (EDT): phase transition is 1st order = existence of continuum limit questionable
p. 10/33 A fundamental puzzle FRGE: existence of NGFP well-established extension to gravity-matter models possible Causal Dynamical Triangulations (CDT): phase diagram contains 2nd order phase transition = possible continuum limit Euclidean Dynamical Triangulations (EDT): phase transition is 1st order = existence of continuum limit questionable Conclusions: measure in partition function can manifestly change physics foliation structure underlying CDT is important
p. 10/33 A fundamental puzzle FRGE: existence of NGFP well-established extension to gravity-matter models possible Causal Dynamical Triangulations (CDT): phase diagram contains 2nd order phase transition = possible continuum limit Euclidean Dynamical Triangulations (EDT): phase transition is 1st order = existence of continuum limit questionable Conclusions: measure in partition function can manifestly change physics foliation structure underlying CDT is important construct a FRGE tailored to CDT
p. 11/33 renormalization group flows in the ADM-formalism
p. 12/33 Introducing time through the ADM formalism Preferred time -direction via foliation of space-time foliation structure M d+1 = R M d with y µ (t,x a ): ds 2 = N 2 dt 2 +σ ij ( dx i +N i dt )( dx j +N j dt ) fundamental fields: g µν (N,N i,σ ij ) g µν = N2 +N i N i N i N j σ ij
p. 13/33 FRGE for the ADM-formalism fundamental fields: {N(t,x),N i (t,x),σ ij (t,x)} N = N + ˆN, N i = N i + ˆN i, σ ij = σ ij + ˆσ ij symmetry: general coordinate invariance inherited from γ µν : δγ µν = L v (γ µν ), v α = (f(t,x), ζ a (t,x)) induces δn = f t N +ζ k k N +N t f NN i i f, δn i = N i t f +N k N k i f +σ ki t ζ k +N k i ζ k +f t Ñ i +ζ k k N i +N 2 i f δσ ij = f t σ ij +ζ k k σ ij +N j i f +N i j f +σ jk i ζ k +σ ik j ζ k Non-linearity of ADM-decomposition: symmetry realized non-linearly = background Diff(M)-symmetry broken to foliation preserving diffeos [ ( ) ] k k Γ k [h µν ;ḡ µν ] = 1 2 STr Γ (2) 1k k k +R k R k
p. 14/33 renormalization group flows on cosmological backgrounds
p. 15/33 Off-shell flows in the ADM formalism Einstein-Hilbert action in ADM variables Γ grav 1 k = dtd d xn σ [ K ij K ij K 2 ] R+2Λ k 16πG k background: flat Friedmann-Robertson-Walker spacetime N = 1, N i = 0, σ ij = a 2 (t)δ ij. fluctuations: adapted to cosmological perturbation theory ˆN i =u i + i 1 B, i u i = 0 ˆσ ij =h ij ( σ ) 1 ij + i j ψ 1 + i j E + 1 i v j + j 1 v i.
p. 15/33 Off-shell flows in the ADM formalism Einstein-Hilbert action in ADM variables Γ grav 1 k = dtd d xn σ [ K ij K ij K 2 ] R+2Λ k 16πG k background: flat Friedmann-Robertson-Walker spacetime N = 1, N i = 0, σ ij = a 2 (t)δ ij. fluctuations: adapted to cosmological perturbation theory ˆN i =u i + i 1 B, i u i = 0 ˆσ ij =h ij ( σ ) 1 ij + i j ψ 1 + i j E + 1 i v j + j 1 v i. unique gauge-fixing of diffeomorphisms F = t ˆN + i ˆNi 1 2 tˆσ + 2(d 1) d K ˆN, F i = t ˆNi i ˆN 1 2 iˆσ + jˆσ ji +(d 2) K ij ˆNj,
p. 16/33 Gauge-fixing in the ADM formalism (flat space) δ 2 Γ grav k Index hh vv EE ψψ ψe matrix element of 32πG k δ 2 Γ grav k t 2 + 2Λ k 2 [ t 2 2Λ ] k Λ k (d 1) [ (d 2)( t 2 + ) (d 3)Λ ] k 1 2 (d 1)[ t 2 2Λ ] k ˆN ˆN 0 BB 0 uu uv 2 2 t Bψ 2(d 1) t ˆN ψ 2(d 1) [ ] Λ k ˆN E 2Λ k
p. 17/33 Gauge-fixing in the ADM formalism (flat space) δ 2 Γ grav k +S gf Index hh vv EE ψψ ψe matrix element of 32πG k ( δ 2 Γ grav k t 2 + 2Λ k 2 [ t 2 + 2Λ ] k [ ] 2 t + Λ k 1 2 (d 1)(d 3) 4 [ 2 t + 2Λ k ] 1 2 (d 1)[ t 2 + 2Λ ] k +S gf) ˆN ˆN 2 t + BB 2 t + uu uv Bψ ˆN ψ ˆN E 2 [ 2 t + ] 2 t 2(d 1) t (d 1) [ t 2 + Λ ] k 2 t + 2Λ k
p. 18/33 RG flows in the ADM formalism Einstein-Hilbert action in ADM variables Γ grav 1 k = dtd d xn σ [ K ij K ij K 2 ] R+2Λ k 16πG k background: flat Friedmann-Robertson-Walker spacetime N = 1, N i = 0, σ ij = a 2 (t)δ ij. fluctuations: adapted to cosmological perturbation theory ˆN i =u i + i 1 B, i u i = 0 ˆσ ij =h ij ( σ ) 1 ij + i j ψ 1 + i j E + 1 i v j + j 1 v i. unique gauge-fixing of diffeomorphisms F = t ˆN + i ˆNi 1 2 tˆσ + 2(d 1) d K ˆN, F i = t ˆNi i ˆN 1 2 iˆσ + jˆσ ji +(d 2) K ij ˆNj, well-defined Hessian Γ (2) k with relativistic propagators
p. 19/33 beta functions for the gravity-matter system β g =(2+η)g, β λ =(η 2)λ+ g 4π anomalous dimension of Newton s constant: [ (3+ 4 1 2λ + 6 10λ )( B det (λ) 1 η) ] 6 8 η = 16πgB 1 (λ) (4π) 2 +16πgB 2 (λ) and B 1 (λ) 41 9 + 11 6(1 2λ) 5 6(1 2λ) 2 + 3 5λ 3B det (λ) + 7 124λ+196λ2 24B det (λ) 2 B 2 (λ) = 1 36 + 11 24(1 2λ) 5 36(1 2λ) 2 + 3 5λ 12B det (λ) + 7 124λ+196λ2 144B det (λ) 2
p. 20/33 Einstein-Hilbert-truncation on cosmological background J. Biemans, A. Platania and F. Saueressig, arxiv:1609.04813
adding minimally coupled matter fields p. 21/33
p. 22/33 Minimally coupled matter fields in ADM Supplement Einstein-Hilbert action by N S minimally coupled scalar fields S scalar = 1 2 N S i=1 dtd d xn σ [ φ i 0 φ i] N V abelian gauge fields (gauge-fixed) S vector = 1 4 N V i=1 + 1 2ξ N V i=1 dtd d xn σ [ g µν g αβ Fµα i ] Fi νβ dtd d x N σ [ N ḡ µν Dµ A i ] 2 V ν + i=1 dtd d x N σ [ Ci 0 C i] N D Dirac spinors S fermion =i N D i=1 dtd d xn σ [ ψi / ψ i].
p. 23/33 beta functions for the gravity-matter system β g =(2+η)g, β λ =(η 2)λ+ g 4π [ (3+ 4 1 2λ + 6 10λ )( B det (λ) 1 η) ] 8+dλ 6 anomalous dimension of Newton s constant: η = 16πgB 1 (λ) (4π) 2 +16πgB 2 (λ) and B 1 (λ) 41 9 + 11 6(1 2λ) 5 6(1 2λ) 2 + 3 5λ 3B det (λ) + 7 124λ+196λ2 24B det (λ) 2 + 1 6 d g B 2 (λ) = 1 36 + 11 24(1 2λ) 5 36(1 2λ) 2 + 3 5λ 12B det (λ) + 7 124λ+196λ2 144B det (λ) 2 Type I regulator: d g = N S N V N D, d λ = N S +2N V 4N D
Gravity-matter fixed points are quite common d g = N S N V N D, d λ = N S +2N V 4N D 150 100 50 0 50 100 150 100 50 0 50 100 d g d blue: 1 NGFP black: 0 NGFPs red: 3 NGFP green: 2 NGFPs p. 24/33
most of them are UV fixed points d λ 100 50 0-50 -100-150 -100-50 0 50 100 150 d g green: UV-FP: real exponents black: 0 NGFPs blue: UV-FP: complex exponents rest: saddle/ir fixed points p. 25/33
multi-fixed point systems exist 5 d λ 0-5 -10-15 -10 0 10 20 30 d g filled symbols: 3 fixed point systems open symbols: 2 fixed point systems p. 26/33
p. 27/33 most matter sectors are in a good region! model N S N D N V g λ θ 1 θ 2 pure gravity 0 0 0 0.78 + 0.32 0.50 ± 5.38 i Standard Model (SM) 4 45 2 12 0.75 0.93 3.871 2.057 SM, dark matter (dm) 5 45 2 12 0.76 0.94 3.869 2.058 SM, 3 ν 4 24 12 0.72 0.99 3.884 2.057 SM, 3 ν, dm, axion 6 24 12 0.75 1.00 3.882 2.059 MSSM 49 61 2 12 2.26 2.30 3.911 2.154 SU(5) GUT 124 24 24 0.17 + 0.41 25.26 6.008 SO(10) GUT 97 24 45 0.15 + 0.40 19.20 6.010
p. 28/33 renormalization group flows on CDT backgrounds S 1 S d
p. 29/33 Off-shell flows in the ADM formalism Einstein-Hilbert action in ADM variables Γ grav 1 k = dtd d xn σ [ K ij K ij K 2 ] R+2Λ k 16πG k background: S 1 S d N = 1, N i = 0, σ ij = σ ij (r) S d. fluctuations: adapted to cosmological perturbation theory ˆN i =u i + D i 1 B, Di u i = 0 ˆσ ij =h ij + D i 1 v j + D j 1 v i + ( D i D j + 1 d σ ij ) ψ + 1 d σ ijh. unique gauge-fixing of diffeomorphisms S gf 1 = dtd d y σ [ F 2 +F i σ ij ] F j 32πG k F = t ˆN + D i ˆN i 1 2 tˆσ, F i = t ˆN i D i ˆN 1 2 D iˆσ + D jˆσ ji
p. 29/33 Off-shell flows in the ADM formalism Einstein-Hilbert action in ADM variables Γ grav 1 k = dtd d xn σ [ K ij K ij K 2 ] R+2Λ k 16πG k background: S 1 S d N = 1, N i = 0, σ ij = σ ij (r) S d. fluctuations: adapted to cosmological perturbation theory ˆN i =u i + D i 1 B, Di u i = 0 ˆσ ij =h ij + D i 1 v j + D j 1 v i + ( D i D j + 1 d σ ij ) ψ + 1 d σ ijh. unique gauge-fixing of diffeomorphisms S gf 1 = dtd d y σ [ F 2 +F i σ ij ] F j 32πG k F = t ˆN + D i ˆN i 1 2 tˆσ, F i = t ˆN i D i ˆN 1 2 D iˆσ + D jˆσ ji
p. 30/33 Phase diagrams on S 1 S 3 Type I, linear g Type I, exponential g 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.0 0.8 A 1.0 0.8 A 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.2 O C Λ O 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.2 C Λ Type II, linear Type II, exponential g g 1.5 1.5 1.0 A 1.0 A 0.5 B 0.5 O 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 Λ O C 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 Λ
p. 31/33 IR completion of the flow: Type II - linear 10 6 G 10 4 10 4 100 10 5 1 0.01 10 6 4 2 0 2 4 6 8 ln k 4 2 0 2 4 6 8 ln k flow approaches quasi-fixed point C: dimensionful Newton s constant: lim k 0 G k = 0 dimensionful cosmological constant: lim k 0 Λ k = 0!!! transition to IR-phase at Hubble-horizon scales!!!
outlook p. 32/33
p. 33/33 CDT correlation functions [J. Ambjørn, et. al., Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 044010] Best measured correlation functions build from spatial volumes V 3 : expectation value of volume profiles: V 3 (t) correlators for volume fluctuations: (δv 3 (t))(δv 3 (t )) S 1 S 3 S 1 T 3 now within reach of the FRGE based on the ADM-formalism
p. 33/33 CDT correlation functions [J. Ambjørn, et. al., Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 044010] Best measured correlation functions build from spatial volumes V 3 : expectation value of volume profiles: V 3 (t) correlators for volume fluctuations: (δv 3 (t))(δv 3 (t )) S 1 S 3 S 1 T 3 now within reach of the FRGE based on the ADM-formalism Thank you!