Asymptotic Safety in the ADM formalism of gravity

Similar documents
Asymptotically Safe Gravity connecting continuum and Monte Carlo

Causal RG equation for Quantum Einstein Gravity

Asymptotically safe Quantum Gravity. Nonperturbative renormalizability and fractal space-times

Critical exponents in quantum Einstein gravity

A functional renormalization group equation for foliated space-times

Renormalization Group Equations

Quantum Gravity and the Renormalization Group

UV completion of the Standard Model

Asymptotic Safety and Limit Cycles in minisuperspace quantum gravity

On avoiding Ostrogradski instabilities within Asymptotic Safety

One-loop renormalization in a toy model of Hořava-Lifshitz gravity

How to define a continuum limit in CDT?

Quantum Einstein Gravity a status report

Status of Hořava Gravity

Running Couplings in Topologically Massive Gravity

Functional Renormalization Group Equations from a Differential Operator Perspective

Asymptotic safety of gravity and the Higgs boson mass. Mikhail Shaposhnikov Quarks 2010, Kolomna, June 6-12, 2010

Lattice Quantum Gravity and Asymptotic Safety

Manifestly diffeomorphism invariant classical Exact Renormalization Group

Theory. V H Satheeshkumar. XXVII Texas Symposium, Dallas, TX December 8 13, 2013

Anisotropic Interior Solutions in Hořava Gravity and Einstein-Æther Theory

Applications of AdS/CFT correspondence to cold atom physics

THE RENORMALIZATION GROUP AND WEYL-INVARIANCE

Dimensional Reduction in the Renormalisation Group:

HIGGS-GRAVITATIONAL INTERATIONS! IN PARTICLE PHYSICS & COSMOLOGY

Black hole thermodynamics under the microscope

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 2 May 1997

Horava-Lifshitz Theory of Gravity & Applications to Cosmology

Asymptotically safe inflation from quadratic gravity

The ultraviolet behavior of quantum gravity with fakeons

Asymptotically free nonabelian Higgs models. Holger Gies

Zhong-Zhi Xianyu (CMSA Harvard) Tsinghua June 30, 2016

On asymptotic safety in matter-gravity systems

Connections and geodesics in the space of metrics The exponential parametrization from a geometric perspective

Attractor Structure of Gauged Nambu-Jona-Lasinio Model

Introduction to Inflation

SM, EWSB & Higgs. MITP Summer School 2017 Joint Challenges for Cosmology and Colliders. Homework & Exercises

Approaches to Quantum Gravity A conceptual overview

Horava-Lifshitz. Based on: work with ( ), ( ) arxiv: , JCAP 0911:015 (2009) arxiv:

Spectral action, scale anomaly. and the Higgs-Dilaton potential

Manifestly diffeomorphism invariant exact RG

Introduction to (Large) Extra Dimensions

General Relativity and Cosmology Mock exam

Intrinsic Time Quantum Geometrodynamics (ITQG)

Quantum Field Theory. and the Standard Model. !H Cambridge UNIVERSITY PRESS MATTHEW D. SCHWARTZ. Harvard University

Gravitational Renormalization in Large Extra Dimensions

PAPER 71 COSMOLOGY. Attempt THREE questions There are seven questions in total The questions carry equal weight

The asymptotic-safety paradigm for quantum gravity

Holographic Space Time

Analytic continuation of functional renormalization group equations

Higher-derivative relativistic quantum gravity

Contact interactions in string theory and a reformulation of QED

Connection Variables in General Relativity

Higher-derivative relativistic quantum gravity

κ = f (r 0 ) k µ µ k ν = κk ν (5)

MCRG Flow for the Nonlinear Sigma Model

The status of asymptotic safety for quantum gravity and the Standard Model

Towards a manifestly diffeomorphism invariant Exact Renormalization Group

Lecturer: Bengt E W Nilsson

LQG, the signature-changing Poincaré algebra and spectral dimension

An introduction to General Relativity and the positive mass theorem

arxiv:gr-qc/ v1 31 Jul 2001

Mesonic and nucleon fluctuation effects at finite baryon density

Notes on General Relativity Linearized Gravity and Gravitational waves

Lorentz violations: from quantum gravity to black holes. Thomas P. Sotiriou

Recovering General Relativity from Hořava Theory

Holography and Unitarity in Gravitational Physics

Variational Principle and Einstein s equations

Gravitation: Gravitation

Holography with Shape Dynamics

Effect of the Trace Anomaly on the Cosmological Constant. Jurjen F. Koksma

Spinning strings and QED

Higgs-Field and a New Scalar-Tensor Theory of Gravity

Constraints on matter from asymptotic safety

Exercise 1 Classical Bosonic String

Delta-gravity. Jorge Alfaro Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Segundo Encuentro CosmoConce Concepción, March 16, Motivation...

Scale symmetry a link from quantum gravity to cosmology

Gravitational Waves and New Perspectives for Quantum Gravity

Quark-gluon plasma from AdS/CFT Correspondence

Graviton Corrections to Maxwell s Equations. arxiv: (to appear PRD) Katie E. Leonard and R. P. Woodard (U. of Florida)

Who is afraid of quadratic divergences? (Hierarchy problem) & Why is the Higgs mass 125 GeV? (Stability of Higgs potential)

German physicist stops Universe

Local RG, Quantum RG, and Holographic RG. Yu Nakayama Special thanks to Sung-Sik Lee and Elias Kiritsis

General Relativity without paradigm of space-time covariance: sensible quantum gravity and resolution of the problem of time

HOMEWORK 10. Applications: special relativity, Newtonian limit, gravitational waves, gravitational lensing, cosmology, 1 black holes

From Inflation to TeV physics: Higgs Reheating in RG Improved Cosmology

RG flow of the Higgs potential. Holger Gies

Is there any torsion in your future?

Massless field perturbations around a black hole in Hořava-Lifshitz gravity

RG flow of the Higgs potential. Holger Gies

Renormalization Group: non perturbative aspects and applications in statistical and solid state physics.

Scale-invariant alternatives to general relativity

Black hole thermodynamics

The Phase Diagram of the BMN Matrix Model

Theoretical Cosmology and Astrophysics Lecture notes - Chapter 7

RG flow of the Higgs potential. Holger Gies

On the cutoff identification and the quantum. improvement in asymptotic safe gravity

Quantum Dynamics of Supergravity

Holographic Wilsonian Renormalization Group

Regularization Physics 230A, Spring 2007, Hitoshi Murayama

Transcription:

Asymptotic Safety in the ADM formalism of gravity Frank Saueressig Research Institute for Mathematics, Astrophysics and Particle Physics Radboud University Nijmegen J. Biemans, A. Platania and F. Saueressig, arxiv:1609.04813 J. Biemans, A. Platania and F. Saueressig, arxiv:1702.06539 W. Houthoff, A. Kurov and F. Saueressig, in preparation FRG2017 Heidelberg, March 10th, 2017 p. 1/33

p. 2/33 What s the name of the game? Goal: a consistent quantum field theory describing gravity on all scales

p. 3/33 What s the name of the game? Goal: a consistent quantum field theory describing gravity Nature on all scales

p. 4/33 Asymptotic Safety as a successful quantum theoy (for nature) a) non-gaussian fixed point (NGFP) controls the UV-behavior of the RG-trajectory ensures the absence of UV-divergences

p. 4/33 Asymptotic Safety as a successful quantum theoy (for nature) a) non-gaussian fixed point (NGFP) controls the UV-behavior of the RG-trajectory ensures the absence of UV-divergences b) NGFP has finite-dimensional UV-critical surface S UV fixing the position of a RG-trajectory in S UV experimental determination of relevant parameters required for predictivity

p. 4/33 Asymptotic Safety as a successful quantum theoy (for nature) a) non-gaussian fixed point (NGFP) controls the UV-behavior of the RG-trajectory ensures the absence of UV-divergences b) NGFP has finite-dimensional UV-critical surface S UV fixing the position of a RG-trajectory in S UV experimental determination of relevant parameters required for predictivity c) connection to observable low-energy physics: tests of general relativity (cosmological signatures,...) compatibility with standard model of particle physics at 1 TeV (light fermions, Yukawa couplings, Higgs potential,...)

p. 4/33 Asymptotic Safety as a successful quantum theoy (for nature) a) non-gaussian fixed point (NGFP) controls the UV-behavior of the RG-trajectory ensures the absence of UV-divergences b) NGFP has finite-dimensional UV-critical surface S UV fixing the position of a RG-trajectory in S UV experimental determination of relevant parameters required for predictivity c) connection to observable low-energy physics: tests of general relativity (cosmological signatures,...) compatibility with standard model of particle physics at 1 TeV (light fermions, Yukawa couplings, Higgs potential,...) d) structural demands: background independence, unitarity,... resolution of singularities: (black holes, Landau poles,...)

p. 5/33 The Asymptotic Safety sloganizer Gravity rules!

p. 5/33 The Asymptotic Safety sloganizer Gravity rules! Matter matters!

p. 5/33 The Asymptotic Safety sloganizer Gravity rules! Matter matters! Time matters!

p. 6/33 Perturbative quantization of General Relativity Dynamics of General Relativity governed by Einstein-Hilbert action S EH 1 = d 4 x g [ R+2Λ ] 16πG N Newton s constant G N has negative mass-dimension

p. 6/33 Perturbative quantization of General Relativity Dynamics of General Relativity governed by Einstein-Hilbert action S EH 1 = d 4 x g [ R+2Λ ] 16πG N Newton s constant G N has negative mass-dimension Wilsonian picture of perturbative renormalization: dimensionless coupling constant attracted to GFP (free theory) in UV introduce dimensionless coupling constants g 0.04 g k = k 2 G N, λ k Λk 2 GFP: flow governed by mass-dimension: k k g k =2g +O(g 2 ) k k λ k = 2λ+O(g) 0.02 GFP 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.04 Λ

p. 6/33 Perturbative quantization of General Relativity Dynamics of General Relativity governed by Einstein-Hilbert action S EH 1 = d 4 x g [ R+2Λ ] 16πG N Newton s constant G N has negative mass-dimension Wilsonian picture of perturbative renormalization: dimensionless coupling constant attracted to GFP (free theory) in UV introduce dimensionless coupling constants g 0.04 g k = k 2 G N, λ k Λk 2 GFP: flow governed by mass-dimension: k k g k =2g +O(g 2 ) k k λ k = 2λ+O(g) 0.02 GFP 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.04 Λ General Relativity is not asymptotically free

p. 7/33 Quantizing general relativity [M. H. Goroff and A. Sagnotti, Phys. Lett. B160 (1985) 81] [A. E. M. van de Ven, Nucl. Phys. B378 (1992) 309] quantizing the Einstein-Hilbert action S = 1 16πG d 4 x gr has a two-loop divergence = hallmark of perturbative non-renormalizability S div = 1 ǫ 209 2880 1 (16π 2 ) 2 d 4 x gc µν ρσ C ρσ αβ C αβ µν.

Quantizing general relativity [M. H. Goroff and A. Sagnotti, Phys. Lett. B160 (1985) 81] [A. E. M. van de Ven, Nucl. Phys. B378 (1992) 309] quantizing the Einstein-Hilbert action S = 1 16πG d 4 x gr has a two-loop divergence = hallmark of perturbative non-renormalizability S div = 1 ǫ 209 2880 1 (16π 2 ) 2 d 4 x gc µν ρσ C ρσ αβ C αβ µν. the Goroff-Sagnotti challenge mastered: Γ k = 1 16πG k [H. Gies, S. Lippholdt, B. Knorr, F.S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 211302] d 4 x g ( R+2Λ k )+ σ k d 4 x gc µν ρσ C ρσ αβ C αβ µν +... possess a NGFP with two relevant directions: NGFP GS : λ = 0.193, g = 0.707, σ = 0.305 θ 1,2 = 1.475±3.043i, θ 3 = 79.39. p. 7/33

p. 8/33 renormalization group flows in the presence of a foliation

p. 9/33 Technical routes towards asymptotic safety starting point: path integral over metrics Z = Dĝe S[ĝ] FRGE t Γ k [h µν ;ḡ µν ] = 1 2 STr [ ( Γ (2) k +R k ) 1 t R k ] linear split: ĝ µν = ḡ µν +h µν exponential split: ĝ µν = ḡ µρ [ e h ] ρ ν

Technical routes towards asymptotic safety starting point: path integral over metrics Z = Dĝe S[ĝ] FRGE t Γ k [h µν ;ḡ µν ] = 1 2 STr [ ( Γ (2) k +R k ) 1 t R k ] linear split: ĝ µν = ḡ µν +h µν exponential split: ĝ µν = ḡ µρ [ e h ] ρ ν Euclidean Dynamical Triangulations (EDT) Z = triangulations (detĝ) β e SEH [ĝ] Causal Dynamical Triangulations (CDT) Z = causal triangulations e SEH [ĝ] p. 9/33

p. 10/33 A fundamental puzzle FRGE: existence of NGFP well-established extension to gravity-matter models possible Causal Dynamical Triangulations (CDT): phase diagram contains 2nd order phase transition = possible continuum limit Euclidean Dynamical Triangulations (EDT): phase transition is 1st order = existence of continuum limit questionable

p. 10/33 A fundamental puzzle FRGE: existence of NGFP well-established extension to gravity-matter models possible Causal Dynamical Triangulations (CDT): phase diagram contains 2nd order phase transition = possible continuum limit Euclidean Dynamical Triangulations (EDT): phase transition is 1st order = existence of continuum limit questionable Conclusions: measure in partition function can manifestly change physics foliation structure underlying CDT is important

p. 10/33 A fundamental puzzle FRGE: existence of NGFP well-established extension to gravity-matter models possible Causal Dynamical Triangulations (CDT): phase diagram contains 2nd order phase transition = possible continuum limit Euclidean Dynamical Triangulations (EDT): phase transition is 1st order = existence of continuum limit questionable Conclusions: measure in partition function can manifestly change physics foliation structure underlying CDT is important construct a FRGE tailored to CDT

p. 11/33 renormalization group flows in the ADM-formalism

p. 12/33 Introducing time through the ADM formalism Preferred time -direction via foliation of space-time foliation structure M d+1 = R M d with y µ (t,x a ): ds 2 = N 2 dt 2 +σ ij ( dx i +N i dt )( dx j +N j dt ) fundamental fields: g µν (N,N i,σ ij ) g µν = N2 +N i N i N i N j σ ij

p. 13/33 FRGE for the ADM-formalism fundamental fields: {N(t,x),N i (t,x),σ ij (t,x)} N = N + ˆN, N i = N i + ˆN i, σ ij = σ ij + ˆσ ij symmetry: general coordinate invariance inherited from γ µν : δγ µν = L v (γ µν ), v α = (f(t,x), ζ a (t,x)) induces δn = f t N +ζ k k N +N t f NN i i f, δn i = N i t f +N k N k i f +σ ki t ζ k +N k i ζ k +f t Ñ i +ζ k k N i +N 2 i f δσ ij = f t σ ij +ζ k k σ ij +N j i f +N i j f +σ jk i ζ k +σ ik j ζ k Non-linearity of ADM-decomposition: symmetry realized non-linearly = background Diff(M)-symmetry broken to foliation preserving diffeos [ ( ) ] k k Γ k [h µν ;ḡ µν ] = 1 2 STr Γ (2) 1k k k +R k R k

p. 14/33 renormalization group flows on cosmological backgrounds

p. 15/33 Off-shell flows in the ADM formalism Einstein-Hilbert action in ADM variables Γ grav 1 k = dtd d xn σ [ K ij K ij K 2 ] R+2Λ k 16πG k background: flat Friedmann-Robertson-Walker spacetime N = 1, N i = 0, σ ij = a 2 (t)δ ij. fluctuations: adapted to cosmological perturbation theory ˆN i =u i + i 1 B, i u i = 0 ˆσ ij =h ij ( σ ) 1 ij + i j ψ 1 + i j E + 1 i v j + j 1 v i.

p. 15/33 Off-shell flows in the ADM formalism Einstein-Hilbert action in ADM variables Γ grav 1 k = dtd d xn σ [ K ij K ij K 2 ] R+2Λ k 16πG k background: flat Friedmann-Robertson-Walker spacetime N = 1, N i = 0, σ ij = a 2 (t)δ ij. fluctuations: adapted to cosmological perturbation theory ˆN i =u i + i 1 B, i u i = 0 ˆσ ij =h ij ( σ ) 1 ij + i j ψ 1 + i j E + 1 i v j + j 1 v i. unique gauge-fixing of diffeomorphisms F = t ˆN + i ˆNi 1 2 tˆσ + 2(d 1) d K ˆN, F i = t ˆNi i ˆN 1 2 iˆσ + jˆσ ji +(d 2) K ij ˆNj,

p. 16/33 Gauge-fixing in the ADM formalism (flat space) δ 2 Γ grav k Index hh vv EE ψψ ψe matrix element of 32πG k δ 2 Γ grav k t 2 + 2Λ k 2 [ t 2 2Λ ] k Λ k (d 1) [ (d 2)( t 2 + ) (d 3)Λ ] k 1 2 (d 1)[ t 2 2Λ ] k ˆN ˆN 0 BB 0 uu uv 2 2 t Bψ 2(d 1) t ˆN ψ 2(d 1) [ ] Λ k ˆN E 2Λ k

p. 17/33 Gauge-fixing in the ADM formalism (flat space) δ 2 Γ grav k +S gf Index hh vv EE ψψ ψe matrix element of 32πG k ( δ 2 Γ grav k t 2 + 2Λ k 2 [ t 2 + 2Λ ] k [ ] 2 t + Λ k 1 2 (d 1)(d 3) 4 [ 2 t + 2Λ k ] 1 2 (d 1)[ t 2 + 2Λ ] k +S gf) ˆN ˆN 2 t + BB 2 t + uu uv Bψ ˆN ψ ˆN E 2 [ 2 t + ] 2 t 2(d 1) t (d 1) [ t 2 + Λ ] k 2 t + 2Λ k

p. 18/33 RG flows in the ADM formalism Einstein-Hilbert action in ADM variables Γ grav 1 k = dtd d xn σ [ K ij K ij K 2 ] R+2Λ k 16πG k background: flat Friedmann-Robertson-Walker spacetime N = 1, N i = 0, σ ij = a 2 (t)δ ij. fluctuations: adapted to cosmological perturbation theory ˆN i =u i + i 1 B, i u i = 0 ˆσ ij =h ij ( σ ) 1 ij + i j ψ 1 + i j E + 1 i v j + j 1 v i. unique gauge-fixing of diffeomorphisms F = t ˆN + i ˆNi 1 2 tˆσ + 2(d 1) d K ˆN, F i = t ˆNi i ˆN 1 2 iˆσ + jˆσ ji +(d 2) K ij ˆNj, well-defined Hessian Γ (2) k with relativistic propagators

p. 19/33 beta functions for the gravity-matter system β g =(2+η)g, β λ =(η 2)λ+ g 4π anomalous dimension of Newton s constant: [ (3+ 4 1 2λ + 6 10λ )( B det (λ) 1 η) ] 6 8 η = 16πgB 1 (λ) (4π) 2 +16πgB 2 (λ) and B 1 (λ) 41 9 + 11 6(1 2λ) 5 6(1 2λ) 2 + 3 5λ 3B det (λ) + 7 124λ+196λ2 24B det (λ) 2 B 2 (λ) = 1 36 + 11 24(1 2λ) 5 36(1 2λ) 2 + 3 5λ 12B det (λ) + 7 124λ+196λ2 144B det (λ) 2

p. 20/33 Einstein-Hilbert-truncation on cosmological background J. Biemans, A. Platania and F. Saueressig, arxiv:1609.04813

adding minimally coupled matter fields p. 21/33

p. 22/33 Minimally coupled matter fields in ADM Supplement Einstein-Hilbert action by N S minimally coupled scalar fields S scalar = 1 2 N S i=1 dtd d xn σ [ φ i 0 φ i] N V abelian gauge fields (gauge-fixed) S vector = 1 4 N V i=1 + 1 2ξ N V i=1 dtd d xn σ [ g µν g αβ Fµα i ] Fi νβ dtd d x N σ [ N ḡ µν Dµ A i ] 2 V ν + i=1 dtd d x N σ [ Ci 0 C i] N D Dirac spinors S fermion =i N D i=1 dtd d xn σ [ ψi / ψ i].

p. 23/33 beta functions for the gravity-matter system β g =(2+η)g, β λ =(η 2)λ+ g 4π [ (3+ 4 1 2λ + 6 10λ )( B det (λ) 1 η) ] 8+dλ 6 anomalous dimension of Newton s constant: η = 16πgB 1 (λ) (4π) 2 +16πgB 2 (λ) and B 1 (λ) 41 9 + 11 6(1 2λ) 5 6(1 2λ) 2 + 3 5λ 3B det (λ) + 7 124λ+196λ2 24B det (λ) 2 + 1 6 d g B 2 (λ) = 1 36 + 11 24(1 2λ) 5 36(1 2λ) 2 + 3 5λ 12B det (λ) + 7 124λ+196λ2 144B det (λ) 2 Type I regulator: d g = N S N V N D, d λ = N S +2N V 4N D

Gravity-matter fixed points are quite common d g = N S N V N D, d λ = N S +2N V 4N D 150 100 50 0 50 100 150 100 50 0 50 100 d g d blue: 1 NGFP black: 0 NGFPs red: 3 NGFP green: 2 NGFPs p. 24/33

most of them are UV fixed points d λ 100 50 0-50 -100-150 -100-50 0 50 100 150 d g green: UV-FP: real exponents black: 0 NGFPs blue: UV-FP: complex exponents rest: saddle/ir fixed points p. 25/33

multi-fixed point systems exist 5 d λ 0-5 -10-15 -10 0 10 20 30 d g filled symbols: 3 fixed point systems open symbols: 2 fixed point systems p. 26/33

p. 27/33 most matter sectors are in a good region! model N S N D N V g λ θ 1 θ 2 pure gravity 0 0 0 0.78 + 0.32 0.50 ± 5.38 i Standard Model (SM) 4 45 2 12 0.75 0.93 3.871 2.057 SM, dark matter (dm) 5 45 2 12 0.76 0.94 3.869 2.058 SM, 3 ν 4 24 12 0.72 0.99 3.884 2.057 SM, 3 ν, dm, axion 6 24 12 0.75 1.00 3.882 2.059 MSSM 49 61 2 12 2.26 2.30 3.911 2.154 SU(5) GUT 124 24 24 0.17 + 0.41 25.26 6.008 SO(10) GUT 97 24 45 0.15 + 0.40 19.20 6.010

p. 28/33 renormalization group flows on CDT backgrounds S 1 S d

p. 29/33 Off-shell flows in the ADM formalism Einstein-Hilbert action in ADM variables Γ grav 1 k = dtd d xn σ [ K ij K ij K 2 ] R+2Λ k 16πG k background: S 1 S d N = 1, N i = 0, σ ij = σ ij (r) S d. fluctuations: adapted to cosmological perturbation theory ˆN i =u i + D i 1 B, Di u i = 0 ˆσ ij =h ij + D i 1 v j + D j 1 v i + ( D i D j + 1 d σ ij ) ψ + 1 d σ ijh. unique gauge-fixing of diffeomorphisms S gf 1 = dtd d y σ [ F 2 +F i σ ij ] F j 32πG k F = t ˆN + D i ˆN i 1 2 tˆσ, F i = t ˆN i D i ˆN 1 2 D iˆσ + D jˆσ ji

p. 29/33 Off-shell flows in the ADM formalism Einstein-Hilbert action in ADM variables Γ grav 1 k = dtd d xn σ [ K ij K ij K 2 ] R+2Λ k 16πG k background: S 1 S d N = 1, N i = 0, σ ij = σ ij (r) S d. fluctuations: adapted to cosmological perturbation theory ˆN i =u i + D i 1 B, Di u i = 0 ˆσ ij =h ij + D i 1 v j + D j 1 v i + ( D i D j + 1 d σ ij ) ψ + 1 d σ ijh. unique gauge-fixing of diffeomorphisms S gf 1 = dtd d y σ [ F 2 +F i σ ij ] F j 32πG k F = t ˆN + D i ˆN i 1 2 tˆσ, F i = t ˆN i D i ˆN 1 2 D iˆσ + D jˆσ ji

p. 30/33 Phase diagrams on S 1 S 3 Type I, linear g Type I, exponential g 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.0 0.8 A 1.0 0.8 A 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.2 O C Λ O 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.2 C Λ Type II, linear Type II, exponential g g 1.5 1.5 1.0 A 1.0 A 0.5 B 0.5 O 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 Λ O C 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 Λ

p. 31/33 IR completion of the flow: Type II - linear 10 6 G 10 4 10 4 100 10 5 1 0.01 10 6 4 2 0 2 4 6 8 ln k 4 2 0 2 4 6 8 ln k flow approaches quasi-fixed point C: dimensionful Newton s constant: lim k 0 G k = 0 dimensionful cosmological constant: lim k 0 Λ k = 0!!! transition to IR-phase at Hubble-horizon scales!!!

outlook p. 32/33

p. 33/33 CDT correlation functions [J. Ambjørn, et. al., Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 044010] Best measured correlation functions build from spatial volumes V 3 : expectation value of volume profiles: V 3 (t) correlators for volume fluctuations: (δv 3 (t))(δv 3 (t )) S 1 S 3 S 1 T 3 now within reach of the FRGE based on the ADM-formalism

p. 33/33 CDT correlation functions [J. Ambjørn, et. al., Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 044010] Best measured correlation functions build from spatial volumes V 3 : expectation value of volume profiles: V 3 (t) correlators for volume fluctuations: (δv 3 (t))(δv 3 (t )) S 1 S 3 S 1 T 3 now within reach of the FRGE based on the ADM-formalism Thank you!