Assessing others rationality in real time

Similar documents
Endogenous Switching of Volatility Regimes: Rational Expectations and Behavioral Sunspots

Learning in Macroeconomic Models

Are Stationary Hyperinflation Paths Learnable?

Research Division Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper Series

Learning and Monetary Policy

Expectations, Learning and Macroeconomic Policy

Learning Dynamics with Data (Quasi-) Differencing

Learning to Optimize: Theory and Applications

Expectational Business Cycles

Learning and Global Dynamics

Learning to Live in a Liquidity Trap

(In)Stability and Informational E ciency of Prices

Parameterized Expectations Algorithm

Learning and Monetary Policy. Lecture 4 Recent Applications of Learning to Monetary Policy

Monetary Policy and Heterogeneous Expectations

Adaptive Learning and Applications in Monetary Policy. Noah Williams

Recurent Hyperinflations and Learning

Statistical Sunspots

Learnability of E stable Equilibria 1

Model uncertainty and endogenous volatility

PANEL DISCUSSION: THE ROLE OF POTENTIAL OUTPUT IN POLICYMAKING

Statistical Sunspots

Ambiguous Business Cycles: Online Appendix

Chapter 6. Maximum Likelihood Analysis of Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) Models

Master 2 Macro I. Lecture notes #12 : Solving Dynamic Rational Expectations Models

Monetary Policy and Rational Asset Price Bubbles Redux

Topics in Nonlinear Economic Dynamics: Bounded Rationality, Heterogeneous Expectations and Complex Adaptive Systems

Learnability of E stable Equilibria 1

Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports

Two-sided Learning in New Keynesian Models: Dynamics, (Lack of) Convergence and the Value of Information

Sentiments and Aggregate Fluctuations

The stability of macroeconomic systems with Bayesian learners

Adaptive Learning in Macroeconomics: some methodological issues

Volume 29, Issue 4. Stability under learning: the neo-classical growth problem

Expectational Stability in Regime-Switching Rational Expectations Models

Introduction to Numerical Methods

Volume 30, Issue 3. A note on Kalman filter approach to solution of rational expectations models

Stable Finite-State Markov Sunspots

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES SENTIMENTS AND AGGREGATE DEMAND FLUCTUATIONS. Jess Benhabib Pengfei Wang Yi Wen

Time-varying Consumption Tax, Productive Government Spending, and Aggregate Instability.

LEARNING FROM THE EXPECTATIONS OF OTHERS

Knowing What Others Know: Coordination Motives in Information Acquisition

Topic 6: Consumption, Income, and Saving

Coordinating Expectations: Global Games with Strategic Substitutes

Robust Predictions in Games with Incomplete Information

Adaptive Learning in Regime-Switching Models

Sentiments and Aggregate Demand Fluctuations

Cognitive Consistency, Signal Extraction, and. Macroeconomic Persistence

A Discussion of Arouba, Cuba-Borda and Schorfheide: Macroeconomic Dynamics Near the ZLB: A Tale of Two Countries"

Intrinsic Heterogeneity in Expectation Formation

Chapter 1. GMM: Basic Concepts

Sentiments and Aggregate Demand Fluctuations

The Real Business Cycle Model

Indeterminacy and Sunspots in Macroeconomics

Expectations and Monetary Policy

THREE ESSAYS ON ADAPTIVE LEARNING IN MONETARY ECONOMICS

Ergodicity and Non-Ergodicity in Economics

Department of Agricultural Economics. PhD Qualifier Examination. May 2009

ECOM 009 Macroeconomics B. Lecture 2

Consistent Expectations and Misspecification in Stochastic Non-linear Economies

Solving Models with Heterogeneous Expectations

GRESHAM S LAW OF MODEL AVERAGING

Seoul National University Mini-Course: Monetary & Fiscal Policy Interactions II

Animal Spirits, Fundamental Factors and Business Cycle Fluctuations

Bayesian Learning in Social Networks

The Heterogeneous Expectations Hypothesis: Some Evidence from the Lab

Monetary Policy, Expectations and Commitment

Pseudo-Wealth and Consumption Fluctuations

FINM6900 Finance Theory Noisy Rational Expectations Equilibrium for Multiple Risky Assets

Filtering and Likelihood Inference

Area I: Contract Theory Question (Econ 206)

Lecture 3: Dynamics of small open economies

Assessing Structural VAR s

Information Choice in Macroeconomics and Finance.

A joint Initiative of Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität and Ifo Institute for Economic Research STABLE SUNSPOT EQUILIBRIA IN A CASH-IN-ADVANCE ECONOMY*

A primer on Structural VARs

Time Series Models and Inference. James L. Powell Department of Economics University of California, Berkeley

Economics of Networks Social Learning

Learning, Expectations, and Endogenous Business Cycles

Moral Hazard and Persistence

On Determinacy and Learnability in a New Keynesian Model with Unemployment

The Perceptron algorithm

A Course on Advanced Econometrics

Uncertainty and Disagreement in Equilibrium Models

Generalized Stochastic Gradient Learning

Inflation Expectations and Monetary Policy Design: Evidence from the Laboratory

Steven Cook University of Wales Swansea. Abstract

Solution Methods. Jesús Fernández-Villaverde. University of Pennsylvania. March 16, 2016

DYNAMIC EQUIVALENCE PRINCIPLE IN LINEAR RATIONAL EXPECTATIONS MODELS

Graduate Macroeconomics 2 Problem set Solutions

x t = E t [x t+1 ] σ(i t E t [π t+1 ]) + e x,t i t x t

Notes on Time Series Modeling

plim W 0 " 1 N = 0 Prof. N. M. Kiefer, Econ 620, Cornell University, Lecture 16.

GLS-based unit root tests with multiple structural breaks both under the null and the alternative hypotheses

Research Division Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper Series

Stable near-rational sunspot equilibria

Comprehensive Exam. Macro Spring 2014 Retake. August 22, 2014

Stochastic process for macro

A Dynamic Model of Aggregate Demand and Aggregate Supply

Indeterminacy and E-stability in Real Business Cycle Models with Factor-Generated Externalities

Transcription:

Assessing others rationality in real time Gaetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy June 4, 2009 Gaetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 1 / 13

Extending adaptive learning approach in macroeconomics Aim: exploring the potentiality of adaptive learning (Marcet and Sargent, 1989; Evans and Honkapohja 2001) in solving behavioural uncertainty in real time (so overcoming the bounded rationality hypothesis); aetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 2 / 13

Extending adaptive learning approach in macroeconomics Aim: exploring the potentiality of adaptive learning (Marcet and Sargent, 1989; Evans and Honkapohja 2001) in solving behavioural uncertainty in real time (so overcoming the bounded rationality hypothesis); Key idea: agents can learn about rationality of others exactly as they do for exogenous variables as long as they have some noisy perceptions (predictors) about others actual actions; aetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 2 / 13

Extending adaptive learning approach in macroeconomics Aim: exploring the potentiality of adaptive learning (Marcet and Sargent, 1989; Evans and Honkapohja 2001) in solving behavioural uncertainty in real time (so overcoming the bounded rationality hypothesis); Key idea: agents can learn about rationality of others exactly as they do for exogenous variables as long as they have some noisy perceptions (predictors) about others actual actions; Economic relevancy: towards a model of decentralized and endogenous emergence (or failure) of REE looking for an evolutive solution to the "forecasting the forecast of others" problem. aetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 2 / 13

The paper The paper proposes an adaptive learning analysis of a simple expectations coordination game between two agents having non negligible impact on the aggregate expectation, perfect understanding of the model, but noisy perception of each others simultaneous expectations; Gaetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 3 / 13

The paper The paper proposes an adaptive learning analysis of a simple expectations coordination game between two agents having non negligible impact on the aggregate expectation, perfect understanding of the model, but noisy perception of each others simultaneous expectations; Results: a) requirements for a situation like the one entailed by common knowledge assumption (REE) can arise as asymptotic result of a decentralized adaptive learning mechanism without assuming any common knowledge; b) existence of learneable equilibria embodying observational errors and yielding excess volatility; Gaetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 3 / 13

The model The economy is represented by y t = α 0 x t + β λ 1 Et 1 1 y t + (1 λ 1 ) Et 2 1 y t + η t where E i t 1 y t E[y t jω i t 1 ], x t is a vector of exogenous variables and η t is a i.i.d. noise. Gaetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 4 / 13

The model The economy is represented by y t = α 0 x t + β λ 1 Et 1 1 y t + (1 λ 1 ) Et 2 1 y t + η t where E i t 1 y t E[y t jω i t 1 ], x t is a vector of exogenous variables and η t is a i.i.d. noise. The unique rational expectation for the model is y t = α 0 x t (1 β) 1. Gaetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 4 / 13

The model The economy is represented by y t = α 0 x t + β λ 1 Et 1 1 y t + (1 λ 1 ) Et 2 1 y t + η t where E i t 1 y t E[y t jω i t 1 ], x t is a vector of exogenous variables and η t is a i.i.d. noise. The unique rational expectation for the model is y t = α 0 x t (1 β) 1. Assuming agents are endowed with the following loss function (and they are rational) 2 Λ i = E y t Et i 1 y t then REE emerges i both hold RE, that is E i t 1 y t = y t, i = 1, 2. Gaetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 4 / 13

The model The economy is represented by y t = α 0 x t + β λ 1 Et 1 1 y t + (1 λ 1 ) Et 2 1 y t + η t where E i t 1 y t E[y t jω i t 1 ], x t is a vector of exogenous variables and η t is a i.i.d. noise. The unique rational expectation for the model is y t = α 0 x t (1 β) 1. Assuming agents are endowed with the following loss function (and they are rational) 2 Λ i = E y t Et i 1 y t then REE emerges i both hold RE, that is E i t 1 y t = y t, i = 1, 2. RE is a best expectation i both don t doubt the other one holds the same. Gaetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 4 / 13

The model The economy is represented by y t = α 0 x t + β λ 1 Et 1 1 y t + (1 λ 1 ) Et 2 1 y t + η t where E i t 1 y t E[y t jω i t 1 ], x t is a vector of exogenous variables and η t is a i.i.d. noise. The unique rational expectation for the model is y t = α 0 x t (1 β) 1. Assuming agents are endowed with the following loss function (and they are rational) 2 Λ i = E y t Et i 1 y t then REE emerges i both hold RE, that is E i t 1 y t = y t, i = 1, 2. RE is a best expectation i both don t doubt the other one holds the same. Therefore for REE it has to be E i t 1 y t 2 Ω j t 1. Gaetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 4 / 13

Introducing Behavioral Uncertainty Let s deviate from epistemic assumption required for REE emergence assuming a general speci cation of behavioral uncertainty Et i 1 y t 62 Ω j t 1 : Et i 1 E j t 1 y t E j t 1 y t v i,t 1 Υ (µ i, δ i ) where Υ (µ i, δ i ) is a generic distribution whose mean is µ i and variance δ i. Gaetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 5 / 13

Introducing Behavioral Uncertainty Let s deviate from epistemic assumption required for REE emergence assuming a general speci cation of behavioral uncertainty Et i 1 y t 62 Ω j t 1 : Et i 1 E j t 1 y t E j t 1 y t v i,t 1 Υ (µ i, δ i ) where Υ (µ i, δ i ) is a generic distribution whose mean is µ i and variance δ i. In such a case agents best expectations are Et 1 1 (y t y t ) = bb Et 2 1 y t + v 1,t 1 y t Et 2 1 (y t y t ) = bc Et 1 1 y t + v 2,t 1 y t where bb and bc are respectively solutions of min b Λ 1 and min c Λ 2. In words, (bb, bc) are coe cients for which agents expectations are optimal linear projection given available information Ω i t 1. Gaetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 5 / 13

The Dynamic System Agents expectations follow the following exogenous stochastic processes: E 1 t 1 y t = y t + b bbc 1 bbbc v 2,t 1 + b b 1 bbbc v 1,t 1 E 2 t 1 y t = y t + b bbc 1 bbbc v 1,t 1 + bc 1 bbbc v 2,t 1 Gaetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 6 / 13

The Dynamic System Agents expectations follow the following exogenous stochastic processes: E 1 t 1 y t = y t + b bbc 1 bbbc v 2,t 1 + b b 1 bbbc v 1,t 1 E 2 t 1 y t = y t + b bbc 1 bbbc v 1,t 1 + bc 1 bbbc v 2,t 1 Actual Law of Motion is 0 y t = y t + β @ b (λ 1 + (1 λ 1 ) bc) v 1,t 1 bbbc 1 + bc λ 1 bb + (1 λ 1 ) 1 bbbc v 2,t 1 1 A + η t Gaetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 6 / 13

The Dynamic System Agents expectations follow the following exogenous stochastic processes: E 1 t 1 y t = y t + b bbc 1 bbbc v 2,t 1 + b b 1 bbbc v 1,t 1 E 2 t 1 y t = y t + b bbc 1 bbbc v 1,t 1 + bc 1 bbbc v 2,t 1 Actual Law of Motion is 0 y t = y t + β @ b (λ 1 + (1 λ 1 ) bc) v 1,t 1 bbbc 1 + bc λ 1 bb + (1 λ 1 ) 1 bbbc v 2,t 1 1 A + η t De nitions Rational Expectations Equilibrium (REE) is a sequence of fy t g such that b b, bc = (0, 0). Behavioral Sunspots Equilibrium (BSE) is a sequence of fy t g such that b b, bc 6= (0, 0). Gaetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 6 / 13

Existence results (analytic proof.) Proposition The unique REE is an equilibrium of the system at hand in all the parameters space. Gaetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 7 / 13

Existence results (analytic proof.) Proposition The unique REE is an equilibrium of the system at hand in all the parameters space. Gaetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 7 / 13

Existence results (analytic proof.) Proposition The unique REE is an equilibrium of the system at hand in all the parameters space. Proposition In the symmetric case (equal impact and equal observational errors variance), two BSE exist provided β 2 [1, 2). Gaetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 7 / 13

Existence results (analytic proof.) Proposition The unique REE is an equilibrium of the system at hand in all the parameters space. Proposition In the symmetric case (equal impact and equal observational errors variance), two BSE exist provided β 2 [1, 2). Gaetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 7 / 13

Existence results (analytic proof.) Proposition The unique REE is an equilibrium of the system at hand in all the parameters space. Proposition In the symmetric case (equal impact and equal observational errors variance), two BSE exist provided β 2 [1, 2). Notice: Here we not deal with economic relevance of BSE, the issue is referred to a di erent paper. Gaetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 7 / 13

T-map Figure: T-map for the case of two simmetrical agents (λ = 0.5 and ε 1 = ε 2 ) and no correlation between observational errors ρ v = 0. Curves are obtained for di erent values of β, respectively: 0.8 normal, 1 dotted, 1.08 dashed, 1.4 dotted-dashed. "BSE" denotes the high behavioral Sunspot Equilibrium and "bse" the low one. Gaetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 8 / 13

Existence and Learneability of REE The concept of learneability refers to the nature, stable or unstable of the learning dynamics under a recursive least square algorithm around the equilibria computed above. Gaetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 9 / 13

Existence and Learneability of REE The concept of learneability refers to the nature, stable or unstable of the learning dynamics under a recursive least square algorithm around the equilibria computed above. Let s suppose institutional forecasters estimate respectively bb and bc in each point in time with a standard ordinary least square regression. Gaetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 9 / 13

Existence and Learneability of REE The concept of learneability refers to the nature, stable or unstable of the learning dynamics under a recursive least square algorithm around the equilibria computed above. Let s suppose institutional forecasters estimate respectively bb and bc in each point in time with a standard ordinary least square regression. They form expectations according to the rule E 1 t 1 (y t y t ) = b t 1 E 2 t 1 y t + v 1,t 1 y t E 2 t 1 (y t y t ) = c t 1 E 1 t 1 y t + v 2,t 1 y t Gaetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 9 / 13

Existence and Learneability of REE The concept of learneability refers to the nature, stable or unstable of the learning dynamics under a recursive least square algorithm around the equilibria computed above. Let s suppose institutional forecasters estimate respectively bb and bc in each point in time with a standard ordinary least square regression. They form expectations according to the rule E 1 t 1 (y t y t ) = b t 1 E 2 t 1 y t + v 1,t 1 y t E 2 t 1 (y t y t ) = c t 1 E 1 t 1 y t + v 2,t 1 y t De nition An equilibrium (bb, bc) is locally learnable under recursive least square (RLS) algorithm if and only if there exist some neighborhood =(bb, bc) of (bb, bc) such that for each initial condition (b 0, c 0 ) 2 =(bb, bc) the estimates converge almost surely a.s. a.s. to the equilibrium, that is lim t! b t 1 = bb and lim t! c t 1 = bc. Gaetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 9 / 13

Learneability results (analytic proof.) Proposition REE (0, 0) is learneable i β 1 p 1 4λ(1 λ)(1 ρ 2 v ) 2λ(1 λ)(1 ρ 2 v ) Figure: The grey area denotes REE learneability region in the whole parameter space x λ (1 λ) 1 ρ 2 v. Gaetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 10 / 13

Learneability results (analytic proof.) Proposition REE (0, 0) is learneable i β 1 p 1 4λ(1 λ)(1 ρ 2 v ) 2λ(1 λ)(1 ρ 2 v ) Figure: The grey area denotes REE learneability region in the whole parameter space x λ (1 λ) 1 ρ 2 v. Proposition In the symmetric case, whenever BSE exist, the high one is always learneable whereas the low one it is never. Gaetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 10 / 13

Real time simulation b(t), c(t) b(t), c(t) y(t), E1(t), E2(t) y(t), E1(t), E2(t) 1.78 0 5 0 a) RLS convergence to REE 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 5 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 1.78 0 b) RLS convergence to BSE 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 5 0 5 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 t Figure: Two cases of RLS convergence up to 300 periods with λ 1 = 0.5, x t = 0, β = 1.08. Initial conditions are set equal for both at REE value b 0 = c 0 = 0. The two are runned for di erent series of v i,t 1 and η t i.i.d. centred normally distributed schoks with unitary variance. Gaetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 11 / 13

Conclusions The paper shows how adaptive learning can work in a truly behavioral uncertainty problem; Gaetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 12 / 13

Conclusions The paper shows how adaptive learning can work in a truly behavioral uncertainty problem; Interactive learning generates very robust convergence to REE in real time and without assuming any common knowledge property; Gaetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 12 / 13

Conclusions The paper shows how adaptive learning can work in a truly behavioral uncertainty problem; Interactive learning generates very robust convergence to REE in real time and without assuming any common knowledge property; The paper characterizes a new type of non rational equilibria tagged behavioural sunspots equilibria (BSE) entailing excess volatility regimes; Gaetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 12 / 13

Conclusions The paper shows how adaptive learning can work in a truly behavioral uncertainty problem; Interactive learning generates very robust convergence to REE in real time and without assuming any common knowledge property; The paper characterizes a new type of non rational equilibria tagged behavioural sunspots equilibria (BSE) entailing excess volatility regimes; The latter arises provided β 2 [1, 2) and takes shape as a coordination failure. Gaetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 12 / 13

The end Thanks for your attention Gaetano GABALLO Ph.D.candidate University of Siena, Italy Assessing () others rationality in real time June 4, 2009 13 / 13