Growth of Sobolev norms for the cubic NLS

Similar documents
The NLS on product spaces and applications

Recent developments on the global behavior to critical nonlinear dispersive equations. Carlos E. Kenig

Energy transfer model and large periodic boundary value problem for the quintic NLS

Growth of Sobolev norms for the cubic defocusing NLS Lecture 1

DISPERSIVE EQUATIONS: A SURVEY

Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation BAOXIANG WANG. Talk at Tsinghua University 2012,3,16. School of Mathematical Sciences, Peking University.

Scattering for cubic-quintic nonlinear Schrödinger equation on R 3

A PHYSICAL SPACE PROOF OF THE BILINEAR STRICHARTZ AND LOCAL SMOOTHING ESTIMATES FOR THE SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION

Dynamics of energy-critical wave equation

Global solutions for the cubic non linear wave equation

Blow-up on manifolds with symmetry for the nonlinear Schröding

Well-Posedness and Adiabatic Limit for Quantum Zakharov System

Dispersive numerical schemes for Schrödinger equations

Very Weak Turbulence for Certain Dispersive Equations

NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF THE ENERGY-SUPERCRITICAL NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION

On the role of geometry in scattering theory for nonlinear Schrödinger equations

Scattering theory for nonlinear Schrödinger equation with inverse square potential

Solutions to the Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation in Hyperbolic Space

Invariant measures and the soliton resolution conjecture

ON THE PROBABILISTIC CAUCHY THEORY FOR NONLINEAR DISPERSIVE PDES

CUTOFF RESOLVENT ESTIMATES AND THE SEMILINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION

SCATTERING FOR THE TWO-DIMENSIONAL NLS WITH EXPONENTIAL NONLINEARITY

Construction of concentrating bubbles for the energy-critical wave equation

Some physical space heuristics for Strichartz estimates

University of Michigan, Tel.: (734) Department of Mathematics 5834 East Hall 530 Church Street Ann Arbor, MI , USA

The Gaussian free field, Gibbs measures and NLS on planar domains

Strichartz Estimates in Domains

Lecture 4: Birkhoff normal forms

Normal form for the non linear Schrödinger equation

Asymptotic stability for solitons of the Gross-Pitaevskii and Landau-Lifshitz equations

Global well-posedness for semi-linear Wave and Schrödinger equations. Slim Ibrahim

On quasiperiodic boundary condition problem

TADAHIRO OH AND CATHERINE SULEM

KAM for quasi-linear KdV

Local smoothing and Strichartz estimates for manifolds with degenerate hyperbolic trapping

Almost sure global existence and scattering for the one-dimensional NLS

Long-term dynamics of nonlinear wave equations

Inégalités de dispersion via le semi-groupe de la chaleur

BLOWUP THEORY FOR THE CRITICAL NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATIONS REVISITED

RANDOM PROPERTIES BENOIT PAUSADER

A GLOBAL COMPACT ATTRACTOR FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL DEFOCUSING NON-LINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATIONS WITH POTENTIAL TERENCE TAO

On the Cauchy problem of 3-D energy-critical Schrödinger equations with subcritical perturbations

Strichartz Estimates for the Schrödinger Equation in Exterior Domains

ON GLOBAL SOLUTIONS OF A ZAKHAROV-SCHULMAN TYPE SYSTEM

Scattering for the NLS equation

Abstracts. Furstenberg The Dynamics of Some Arithmetically Generated Sequences

The Schrödinger propagator for scattering metrics

The Chern-Simons-Schrödinger equation

From quantum many body systems to nonlinear dispersive PDE, and back

Long time existence of space periodic water waves

Properties of solutions to the semi-linear Schrödinger equation.

Piecewise Smooth Solutions to the Burgers-Hilbert Equation

POINTWISE BOUNDS ON QUASIMODES OF SEMICLASSICAL SCHRÖDINGER OPERATORS IN DIMENSION TWO

Almost Sure Well-Posedness of Cubic NLS on the Torus Below L 2

Multisolitons for NLS

Fractal solutions of dispersive PDE

Bielefeld Course on Nonlinear Waves - June 29, Department of Mathematics University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Solitons on Manifolds

M ath. Res. Lett. 15 (2008), no. 6, c International Press 2008 SCATTERING FOR THE NON-RADIAL 3D CUBIC NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION

NONLOCAL DIFFUSION EQUATIONS

Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Inverse Problems in Engineering: Theory and Practice, Cambridge, UK, 11-15th July 2005

Hamiltonian partial differential equations and Painlevé transcendents

Many body quantum dynamics and nonlinear dispersive PDE

On the Asymptotic Behavior of Large Radial Data for a Focusing Non-Linear Schrödinger Equation

On the stochastic nonlinear Schrödinger equation

Nonlinear Modulational Instability of Dispersive PDE Models

Strauss conjecture for nontrapping obstacles

Smoothing Effects for Linear Partial Differential Equations

Dispersive numerical schemes for Schrödinger equations

SCATTERING FOR THE NON-RADIAL 3D CUBIC NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION

From many body quantum dynamics to nonlinear dispersive PDE, and back

1-D cubic NLS with several Diracs as initial data and consequences

Nonlinear Waves 2016 : June Conference Centre de conférences Marilyn et James Simons ABSTRACTS

KAM for NLS with harmonic potential

Finite-time singularity formation for Euler vortex sheet

ENERGY CASCADES FOR NLS ON T d

Regularity and Decay Estimates of the Navier-Stokes Equations

Endpoint resolvent estimates for compact Riemannian manifolds

arxiv: v1 [math.ap] 11 Apr 2011

Global well-posedness and scattering for the defocusing quintic nonlinear Schrödinger equation in two dimensions

TADAHIRO OH 0, 3 8 (T R), (1.5) The result in [2] is in fact stated for time-periodic functions: 0, 1 3 (T 2 ). (1.4)

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.ap] 24 Apr 2003

ON STRICHARTZ ESTIMATES FOR SCHRÖDINGER OPERATORS IN COMPACT MANIFOLDS WITH BOUNDARY. 1. Introduction

Natalia Tronko S.V.Nazarenko S. Galtier

Hamiltonian partial differential equations and Painlevé transcendents

Separation for the stationary Prandtl equation

NONLINEAR FRACTIONAL SCHRÖDINGER EQUATIONS IN ONE DIMENSION

Mean Field Limits for Interacting Bose Gases and the Cauchy Problem for Gross-Pitaevskii Hierarchies. Thomas Chen University of Texas at Austin

Exponential approach to equilibrium for a stochastic NLS

arxiv: v2 [math.ap] 29 May 2012

H = ( H(x) m,n. Ω = T d T x = x + ω (d frequency shift) Ω = T 2 T x = (x 1 + x 2, x 2 + ω) (skewshift)

A LOWER BOUND ON BLOWUP RATES FOR THE 3D INCOMPRESSIBLE EULER EQUATION AND A SINGLE EXPONENTIAL BEALE-KATO-MAJDA ESTIMATE. 1.

GLOBAL SOLUTIONS OF THE GRAVITY-CAPILLARY WATER WAVE SYSTEM IN 3 DIMENSIONS

arxiv: v2 [math.ap] 28 Nov 2016

The blow-up dynamic and upper bound on the blow-up rate for critical nonlinear Schrödinger equation

Microlocal analysis and inverse problems Lecture 3 : Carleman estimates

arxiv: v1 [math.ap] 20 Nov 2007

arxiv: v3 [math.ap] 14 Nov 2010

1D Quintic NLS with White Noise Dispersion

The enigma of the equations of fluid motion: A survey of existence and regularity results

arxiv: v1 [math.ap] 21 Jan 2016

Transcription:

Growth of Sobolev norms for the cubic NLS Benoit Pausader N. Tzvetkov. Brown U. Spectral theory and mathematical physics, Cergy, June 2016

Introduction We consider the cubic nonlinear Schrödinger equation (i t + ) u = u 2 u This is a model for dispersive evolution with nonlinear perturbation. We want to understand the following questions: What is the influence of the domain? What kind of asymptotic behavior is possible? Creation of energy at small scales/ Growth of Sobolev norms

Introduction We consider the cubic nonlinear Schrödinger equation (i t + ) u = u 2 u This is a model for dispersive evolution with nonlinear perturbation. We want to understand the following questions: What is the influence of the domain? What kind of asymptotic behavior is possible? Creation of energy at small scales/ Growth of Sobolev norms

NLS as a Hamiltonian system Hamiltonian equation { 1 H(u) = X 2 g u 2 + 1 } 4 u 4 dν g, Ω(u, v) = I uv dν g, In general, only one more conservation law M(u) = u 2 dν g. Natural to study the equation in H 1 (X ). X X

NLS as a Hamiltonian system Hamiltonian equation { 1 H(u) = X 2 g u 2 + 1 } 4 u 4 dν g, Ω(u, v) = I uv dν g, In general, only one more conservation law M(u) = u 2 dν g. Natural to study the equation in H 1 (X ). X X

NLS as a Hamiltonian system Hamiltonian equation { 1 H(u) = X 2 g u 2 + 1 } 4 u 4 dν g, Ω(u, v) = I uv dν g, In general, only one more conservation law M(u) = u 2 dν g. Natural to study the equation in H 1 (X ). X X

NLS on R d On R d, the equation is reasonably well understood: GWP when d 4 and ill-posed when d 5 [Ginibre-Vélo, Bourgain, Grillakis, CKSTT, Killip-Visan, Kenig-Merle] 2 d 4: Solutions scatters, d = 1, small Solutions modified-scattering (cubic NLS completely integrable), solutions scatter for quintic nonlinearity. In particular, smooth solutions satisfy u(t) H s C( u(0) H 1) u(0) H s uniformly in time. These results can be extended to some cases of domain with large volume (e.g.h 3 : Banica, Ionescu-P.-Staffilani).

NLS on R d On R d, the equation is reasonably well understood: GWP when d 4 and ill-posed when d 5 2 d 4: Solutions scatters [...,Dodson], d = 1, small Solutions modified-scattering (cubic NLS completely integrable), solutions scatter for quintic nonlinearity. In particular, smooth solutions satisfy u(t) H s C( u(0) H 1) u(0) H s uniformly in time. These results can be extended to some cases of domain with large volume (e.g.h 3 : Banica, Ionescu-P.-Staffilani).

NLS on R d On R d, the equation is reasonably well understood: GWP when d 4 and ill-posed when d 5 2 d 4: Solutions scatters, d = 1, small Solutions modified-scattering (cubic NLS completely integrable) [Zakharov-Shabat, Deift-Zhou, Hayashi-Naumkin, Kato-Pusateri], solutions scatter for quintic nonlinearity. In particular, smooth solutions satisfy u(t) H s C( u(0) H 1) u(0) H s uniformly in time. These results can be extended to some cases of domain with large volume (e.g.h 3 : Banica, Ionescu-P.-Staffilani).

NLS on R d On R d, the equation is reasonably well understood: GWP when d 4 and ill-posed when d 5 2 d 4: Solutions scatters, d = 1, small Solutions modified-scattering (cubic NLS completely integrable), solutions scatter for quintic nonlinearity. In particular, smooth solutions satisfy u(t) H s C( u(0) H 1) u(0) H s uniformly in time. These results can be extended to some cases of domain with large volume (e.g.h 3 : Banica, Ionescu-P.-Staffilani).

NLS on R d On R d, the equation is reasonably well understood: GWP when d 4 and ill-posed when d 5 2 d 4: Solutions scatters, d = 1, small Solutions modified-scattering (cubic NLS completely integrable), solutions scatter for quintic nonlinearity. In particular, smooth solutions satisfy u(t) H s C( u(0) H 1) u(0) H s uniformly in time. These results can be extended to some cases of domain with large volume (e.g.h 3 : Banica, Ionescu-P.-Staffilani).

(modified) Scattering A solution scatters if it eventually follows the linear flow: u(t) = e it {f + o(1)}, t. On R, solutions sometimes have a modified scattering û(ξ, t) = e it xx F 1 { e i f (ξ) 2 log t f (ξ) + o(1) }, t with a logarithmic correction.

(modified) Scattering A solution scatters if it eventually follows the linear flow: u(t) = e it {f + o(1)}, t. On R, solutions sometimes have a modified scattering û(ξ, t) = e it xx F 1 { e i f (ξ) 2 log t f (ξ) + o(1) }, t with a logarithmic correction.

NLS on small domains For domains with smaller volume : weaker dispersion, one expects the linear flow to play a less important role. This is what we want to explore.

Global existence For GWP: only need control locally in time. Expect same theory as in R d. Verified in lower dimensions (T d : Bourgain, d = 2 or S d : Burq-Gérard-Tzvetkov). Even true in critical cases, e.g. T 4 (Herr-Tataru-Tzvetkov, Ionescu-P.). Idea: Appropriate functional spaces to obtain small data theory. Large data, only obstruction is infinite concentration of energy at a point in space-time blow-up analysis + concentration compactness back to situation on R d. However, these results are still consistent with the following picture: u(k + 1) H s 2 u(k) H s.

Global existence For GWP: only need control locally in time. Expect same theory as in R d. Verified in lower dimensions (T d : Bourgain, d = 2 or S d : Burq-Gérard-Tzvetkov). Even true in critical cases, e.g. T 4 (Herr-Tataru-Tzvetkov, Ionescu-P.). Idea: Appropriate functional spaces to obtain small data theory. Large data, only obstruction is infinite concentration of energy at a point in space-time blow-up analysis + concentration compactness back to situation on R d. However, these results are still consistent with the following picture: u(k + 1) H s 2 u(k) H s.

Global existence For GWP: only need control locally in time. Expect same theory as in R d. Verified in lower dimensions (T d : Bourgain, d = 2 or S d : Burq-Gérard-Tzvetkov). Even true in critical cases, e.g. T 4 (Herr-Tataru-Tzvetkov, Ionescu-P.). Idea: Appropriate functional spaces to obtain small data theory. Large data, only obstruction is infinite concentration of energy at a point in space-time blow-up analysis + concentration compactness back to situation on R d. However, these results are still consistent with the following picture: u(k + 1) H s 2 u(k) H s.

Global existence For GWP: only need control locally in time. Expect same theory as in R d. Verified in lower dimensions (T d : Bourgain, d = 2 or S d : Burq-Gérard-Tzvetkov). Even true in critical cases, e.g. T 4 (Herr-Tataru-Tzvetkov, Ionescu-P.). Idea: Appropriate functional spaces to obtain small data theory. Large data, only obstruction is infinite concentration of energy at a point in space-time blow-up analysis + concentration compactness back to situation on R d. However, these results are still consistent with the following picture: u(k + 1) H s 2 u(k) H s.

Global existence For GWP: only need control locally in time. Expect same theory as in R d. Verified in lower dimensions (T d : Bourgain, d = 2 or S d : Burq-Gérard-Tzvetkov). Even true in critical cases, e.g. T 4 (Herr-Tataru-Tzvetkov, Ionescu-P.). Idea: Appropriate functional spaces to obtain small data theory. Large data, only obstruction is infinite concentration of energy at a point in space-time blow-up analysis + concentration compactness back to situation on R d. However, these results are still consistent with the following picture: u(k + 1) H s 2 u(k) H s.

Global existence For GWP: only need control locally in time. Expect same theory as in R d. Verified in lower dimensions (T d : Bourgain, d = 2 or S d : Burq-Gérard-Tzvetkov). Even true in critical cases, e.g. T 4 (Herr-Tataru-Tzvetkov, Ionescu-P.). Idea: Appropriate functional spaces to obtain small data theory. Large data, only obstruction is infinite concentration of energy at a point in space-time blow-up analysis + concentration compactness back to situation on R d. However, these results are still consistent with the following picture: u(k + 1) H s 2 u(k) H s.

Asymptotic behavior Asymptotic behavior much more difficult on a small domain. On T d, various heuristic arguments related to weak turbulence : generic solutions will explore all of phase space, solutions will cascade to large frequency creation of small scales A related mathematical question was asked by Bourgain (00): Does there exist a solution such that u(0) H 2 1, lim sup u(t) H 2 =? t +

Few evidence for norm growth Not possible if scattering or on R d or on T 1. Difficult to control solutions globally in time on a compact domain! No explicit solution whose norm do become unbounded. Besides the growth should be slow: [Bourgain] u(t) H s A (1 + t) A (conjecture (log t) A ). Example of nontrivial globally bounded solutions (KAM results [Kuksin, Bourgain... ]

Few evidence for norm growth Not possible if scattering or on R d or on T 1. Difficult to control solutions globally in time on a compact domain! No explicit solution whose norm do become unbounded. Besides the growth should be slow: [Bourgain] u(t) H s A (1 + t) A (conjecture (log t) A ). Example of nontrivial globally bounded solutions (KAM results [Kuksin, Bourgain... ]

Few evidence for norm growth Not possible if scattering or on R d or on T 1. Difficult to control solutions globally in time on a compact domain! No explicit solution whose norm do become unbounded. Besides the growth should be slow: [Bourgain] u(t) H s A (1 + t) A (conjecture (log t) A ). Example of nontrivial globally bounded solutions (KAM results [Kuksin, Bourgain... ]

Few evidence for norm growth Not possible if scattering or on R d or on T 1. Difficult to control solutions globally in time on a compact domain! No explicit solution whose norm do become unbounded. Besides the growth should be slow: [Bourgain] u(t) H s A (1 + t) A (conjecture (log t) A ). Example of nontrivial globally bounded solutions (KAM results [Kuksin, Bourgain... ]

Few evidence for norm growth (II) Some evidence of finite growth [Kuksin]. Importantly Arbitrary finite growth on T 2 [CKSTT] Given ε > 0, s > 1 and K > 0, there exists a solution u of cubic NLS on T 2 and a time T such that u(0) H s < ε, u(t ) H s > K. Related results [Hani, Kaloshin-Guardia, Procesi-Haus]. Remark: Only shows no a priori uniform bound; it is possible that the growth saturates. Recent similar results for the cubic half-wave equation on R [Gérard-Lenzman-Pocovnicu-Raphael].

Few evidence for norm growth (II) Some evidence of finite growth [Kuksin]. Importantly Arbitrary finite growth on T 2 [CKSTT] Given ε > 0, s > 1 and K > 0, there exists a solution u of cubic NLS on T 2 and a time T such that u(0) H s < ε, u(t ) H s > K. Related results [Hani, Kaloshin-Guardia, Procesi-Haus]. Remark: Only shows no a priori uniform bound; it is possible that the growth saturates. Recent similar results for the cubic half-wave equation on R [Gérard-Lenzman-Pocovnicu-Raphael].

The space R T 2 Nice space to test these questions R T 2 : Access to nice Fourier analysis. Partially compact. One can ask the following questions: what is the threshold for asymptotically linear behavior (i.e. scattering)? what happens beyond this? These questions can be completely answered in the context of noncompact quotients of R d (R T 2 is the most interesting example).

The space R T 2 Nice space to test these questions R T 2 : Access to nice Fourier analysis. Partially compact. One can ask the following questions: what is the threshold for asymptotically linear behavior (i.e. scattering)? what happens beyond this? These questions can be completely answered in the context of noncompact quotients of R d (R T 2 is the most interesting example).

The space R T 2 Nice space to test these questions R T 2 : Access to nice Fourier analysis. Partially compact. One can ask the following questions: what is the threshold for asymptotically linear behavior (i.e. scattering)? what happens beyond this? These questions can be completely answered in the context of noncompact quotients of R d (R T 2 is the most interesting example).

Scattering [Tzvetkov-Visciglia, Hani-P.]. One can have a nice scattering theory for (i t + ) u = u p 1 u on R T d if and only if one can have a nice scattering theory for this equation on R if and only if p 5. At the limit (p = 5), the result is still true but sequences of solutions lose compactness in new ways [Hani-P.].

Scattering [Tzvetkov-Visciglia, Hani-P.]. One can have a nice scattering theory for (i t + ) u = u p 1 u on R T d if and only if one can have a nice scattering theory for this equation on R if and only if p 5. At the limit (p = 5), the result is still true but sequences of solutions lose compactness in new ways [Hani-P.].

This only leaves one possibility for an interesting behavior: the cubic equation on R T d. Infinite growth [HPTV, Tzvetkov-P.] Let s > 5/8, s 1. There exists solutions of the cubic NLS on R T 2 such that lim sup U(t) H s =. t + Not true (for small data) on R T (some form of complete integrability). True even for some 0 < s < 1 despite the conservation laws at s = 0 and s = 1! Contrast with recent results of Killip-Visan, Koch-Tataru for the completely integrable case.

This only leaves one possibility for an interesting behavior: the cubic equation on R T d. Infinite growth [HPTV, Tzvetkov-P.] Let s > 5/8, s 1. There exists solutions of the cubic NLS on R T 2 such that lim sup U(t) H s =. t + Not true (for small data) on R T (some form of complete integrability). True even for some 0 < s < 1 despite the conservation laws at s = 0 and s = 1! Contrast with recent results of Killip-Visan, Koch-Tataru for the completely integrable case.

This only leaves one possibility for an interesting behavior: the cubic equation on R T d. Infinite growth [HPTV, Tzvetkov-P.] Let s > 5/8, s 1. There exists solutions of the cubic NLS on R T 2 such that lim sup U(t) H s =. t + Not true (for small data) on R T (some form of complete integrability). True even for some 0 < s < 1 despite the conservation laws at s = 0 and s = 1! Contrast with recent results of Killip-Visan, Koch-Tataru for the completely integrable case.

This only leaves one possibility for an interesting behavior: the cubic equation on R T d. Infinite growth [HPTV, Tzvetkov-P.] Let s > 5/8, s 1. There exists solutions of the cubic NLS on R T 2 such that lim sup U(t) H s =. t + Not true (for small data) on R T (some form of complete integrability). True even for some 0 < s < 1 despite the conservation laws at s = 0 and s = 1! Contrast with recent results of Killip-Visan, Koch-Tataru for the completely integrable case.

Appearance of the resonant system Solutions expected to decay over time, (i t + ) u = u 2 u ( ε 2 u) to first order, solutions evolve linearly. Conjugate out the linear flow u(t) = e it R T d F (t), i t F = N [F, F, F ]

Appearance of the resonant system Solutions expected to decay over time, (i t + ) u = u 2 u ( ε 2 u) to first order, solutions evolve linearly. Conjugate out the linear flow u(t) = e it R T d F (t), i t F = N [F, F, F ]

Appearance of the resonant system Solutions expected to decay over time, (i t + ) u = u 2 u ( ε 2 u) to first order, solutions evolve linearly. Conjugate out the linear flow u(t) = e it R T d F (t), i t F = N [F, F, F ] FN [F, G, H](ξ, p) = q r+s=p R 2 e itφ Fq (ξ η)ĝr (ξ η θ)ĥs(ξ θ)dηdθ, Φ := p 2 q 2 + r 2 s 2 + 2ηθ

Appearance of the resonant system II i t F = N [F, F, F ] FN [F, G, H](ξ, p) = q r+s=p R 2 e itφ Fq (ξ η, t)ĝr (ξ η θ, t)ĥs(ξ θ, t)dηdθ, Φ := p 2 q 2 + r 2 s 2 + 2ηθ Expect t F ε 2 so main time dependence is in the phase. If Φ 1, can integrate terms through a normal form: i t F = N Φ 1 [F, F, F ] + O(F 5 ), F F = O(F 3 ) Quintic nonlinearities lead to scattering: can be neglected after a long enough time.

Appearance of the resonant system II i t F = N [F, F, F ] FN [F, G, H](ξ, p) = q r+s=p R 2 e itφ Fq (ξ η, t)ĝr (ξ η θ, t)ĥs(ξ θ, t)dηdθ, Φ := p 2 q 2 + r 2 s 2 + 2ηθ Expect t F ε 2 so main time dependence is in the phase. If Φ 1, can integrate terms through a normal form: i t F = N Φ 1 [F, F, F ] + O(F 5 ), F F = O(F 3 ) Quintic nonlinearities lead to scattering: can be neglected after a long enough time.

Appearance of the resonant system II i t F = N [F, F, F ] FN [F, G, H](ξ, p) = q r+s=p R 2 e itφ Fq (ξ η, t)ĝr (ξ η θ, t)ĥs(ξ θ, t)dηdθ, Φ := p 2 q 2 + r 2 s 2 + 2ηθ Expect t F ε 2 so main time dependence is in the phase. If Φ 1, can integrate terms through a normal form: i t F = N Φ 1 [F, F, F ] + O(F 5 ), F F = O(F 3 ) Quintic nonlinearities lead to scattering: can be neglected after a long enough time.

Appearance of the resonant system We are left with i t F = R [F, F, F ] FR [F, G, H](ξ, p) = q r+s=p R 2 e itφ ϕ(φ) F q (ξ η, t)ĝr (ξ η θ, t)ĥs(ξ θ, t)dηdθ, Φ := p 2 q 2 + r 2 s 2 + 2ηθ Main contribution comes from stationary phase η = θ = 0.

Appearance of the resonant system We are left with i t F (ξ, p, t) = π t q r+s=p, q 2 r 2 + s 2 = p 2 F q (ξ, t) F r (ξ, t) F s (ξ, t) This is, for each fixed ξ an ODE which is the resonant system of the cubic NLS on T 2. At this point, it is a derivative analysis from the work of CKSTT to create solutions that grow.

Appearance of the resonant system We are left with i t F (ξ, p, t) = π t q r+s=p, q 2 r 2 + s 2 = p 2 F q (ξ, t) F r (ξ, t) F s (ξ, t) This is, for each fixed ξ an ODE which is the resonant system of the cubic NLS on T 2. At this point, it is a derivative analysis from the work of CKSTT to create solutions that grow.

Appearance of the resonant system We are left with i t F (ξ, p, t) = π t q r+s=p, q 2 r 2 + s 2 = p 2 F q (ξ, t) F r (ξ, t) F s (ξ, t) This is, for each fixed ξ an ODE which is the resonant system of the cubic NLS on T 2. At this point, it is a derivative analysis from the work of CKSTT to create solutions that grow.

Why R T 2 and not T 2? Although one would expect growth to appear more easily on T 2, this remains an open question. All the results about growth so far rely on special solutions for the resonant system that grow. Key difference between R T 2 and T 2 : validity of approximation Equ(u) RS(u) + O(u 5 ). on R T 2, quintic terms scatter and thus are perturbative globally in time.

Why R T 2 and not T 2? Although one would expect growth to appear more easily on T 2, this remains an open question. All the results about growth so far rely on special solutions for the resonant system that grow. Key difference between R T 2 and T 2 : validity of approximation Equ(u) RS(u) + O(u 5 ). on R T 2, quintic terms scatter and thus are perturbative globally in time.

Why R T 2 and not T 2? Although one would expect growth to appear more easily on T 2, this remains an open question. All the results about growth so far rely on special solutions for the resonant system that grow. Key difference between R T 2 and T 2 : validity of approximation Equ(u) RS(u) + O(u 5 ). on R T 2, quintic terms scatter and thus are perturbative globally in time.

Why R T 2 and not T 2? Although one would expect growth to appear more easily on T 2, this remains an open question. All the results about growth so far rely on special solutions for the resonant system that grow. Key difference between R T 2 and T 2 : validity of approximation Equ(u) RS(u) + O(u 5 ). on R T 2, quintic terms scatter and thus are perturbative globally in time.

Quite challenging finding appropriate norms in which to close the nonlinear estimates, especially in the low-regularity case s < 1 when solutions are unbounded in L. need to control over long time solutions of a nonintegrable ODE whose solutions can grow. Idea: use 2 norms A Strong norm which provides good control on the solutions (e.g. u, xe it u L 2 ) but which grows slowly over time A Weak norm which remains bounded uniformly in time. Corresponds to a conservation law for the resonant system.

Quite challenging finding appropriate norms in which to close the nonlinear estimates, especially in the low-regularity case s < 1 when solutions are unbounded in L. need to control over long time solutions of a nonintegrable ODE whose solutions can grow. Idea: use 2 norms A Strong norm which provides good control on the solutions (e.g. u, xe it u L 2 ) but which grows slowly over time A Weak norm which remains bounded uniformly in time. Corresponds to a conservation law for the resonant system.

Modified scattering Modified scattering for the cubic NLS on R T 2 [HPTV, P.-Tzvetkov] Let s > 1, there exists a norm X such that any ID small in X leads to a global solution of the cubic NLS on R T 2. Moreover, this solution satisfies a modified scattering in the sense that there exists a solution of the equation t Ĝ p (ξ, t) = p+q 2 =q 1 +q 3 p 2 + q 2 2 = q 1 2 + q 3 2 Ĝ q1 (ξ, t)ĝq 2 (ξ, t)ĝq 3 (ξ, t) such that U(t) e it R T 2 G(π ln t) H s 0.

Exotic solutions All solutions to the resonant system i t a p = q r+s=p, q 2 r 2 + s 2 = p 2 a q a r a s correspond to an asymptotic behavior of the cubic NLS: many unusual behaviors! Growth, beating effect... A key missing point: good understanding of the solutions of the resonant system.

Exotic solutions All solutions to the resonant system i t a p = q r+s=p, q 2 r 2 + s 2 = p 2 a q a r a s correspond to an asymptotic behavior of the cubic NLS: many unusual behaviors! Growth, beating effect... A key missing point: good understanding of the solutions of the resonant system.

A physical space formula for the resonant system One can also obtain a formula for the resonant system in the physical space: a function f (x, t) = p Z d a p (t)e i p,x is a solution if i t f = 2π α=0 { } e iα e iα f (x, t) e iα f (x, t) e iα f (x, t) dα which is the Hamiltonian associated to the averaged perturbation H av = 2π α=0 X e iα f 4 dνdα.