Space-time Galerkin POD for optimal control of Burgers equation. April 27, 2017 Absolventen Seminar Numerische Mathematik, TU Berlin

Similar documents
3.1.3 INTRODUCTION TO DYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION: DISCRETE TIME PROBLEMS. A. The Hamiltonian and First-Order Conditions in a Finite Time Horizon

An introduction to the theory of SDDP algorithm

Notes on Kalman Filtering

Random Walk on Circle Imagine a Markov process governing the random motion of a particle on a circular

1 Subdivide the optimization horizon [t 0,t f ] into n s 1 control stages,

Zürich. ETH Master Course: L Autonomous Mobile Robots Localization II

Ordinary Differential Equations

GENERALIZATION OF THE FORMULA OF FAA DI BRUNO FOR A COMPOSITE FUNCTION WITH A VECTOR ARGUMENT

Recursive Least-Squares Fixed-Interval Smoother Using Covariance Information based on Innovation Approach in Linear Continuous Stochastic Systems

Lecture 20: Riccati Equations and Least Squares Feedback Control

2.160 System Identification, Estimation, and Learning. Lecture Notes No. 8. March 6, 2006

SUFFICIENT CONDITIONS FOR EXISTENCE SOLUTION OF LINEAR TWO-POINT BOUNDARY PROBLEM IN MINIMIZATION OF QUADRATIC FUNCTIONAL

Probabilistic Robotics

On-line Adaptive Optimal Timing Control of Switched Systems

Crossing the Bridge between Similar Games

Augmented Reality II - Kalman Filters - Gudrun Klinker May 25, 2004

Georey E. Hinton. University oftoronto. Technical Report CRG-TR February 22, Abstract

Sumudu Decomposition Method for Solving Fractional Delay Differential Equations

Class Meeting # 10: Introduction to the Wave Equation

Hamburger Beiträge zur Angewandten Mathematik

The fundamental mass balance equation is ( 1 ) where: I = inputs P = production O = outputs L = losses A = accumulation

CERTAIN CLASSES OF SOLUTIONS OF LAGERSTROM EQUATIONS

CONTROL SYSTEMS, ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION Vol. XI Control of Stochastic Systems - P.R. Kumar

An Introduction to Malliavin calculus and its applications

REVERSE COMPUTATION OF FORCED CONVECTION HEAT TRANSFER USING ADJOINT FORMULATION

Analytical Solutions of an Economic Model by the Homotopy Analysis Method

Object tracking: Using HMMs to estimate the geographical location of fish

Multifidelity preconditioning of the cross-entropy method for rare event simulation and failure probability estimation

NUMERICAL SHOOTING METHODS FOR OPTIMAL BOUNDARY CONTROL AND EXACT BOUNDARY CONTROL OF 1-D WAVE EQUATIONS

Energy Storage and Renewables in New Jersey: Complementary Technologies for Reducing Our Carbon Footprint

Stochastic Model Predictive Control for Gust Alleviation during Aircraft Carrier Landing

Applications in Industry (Extended) Kalman Filter. Week Date Lecture Title

Introduction to Mobile Robotics

Homotopy Perturbation Method for Solving Some Initial Boundary Value Problems with Non Local Conditions

Hybrid Control and Switched Systems. Lecture #3 What can go wrong? Trajectories of hybrid systems

Simulation of BSDEs and. Wiener Chaos Expansions

Simulation of BSDEs and. Wiener Chaos Expansions

Multi-scale 2D acoustic full waveform inversion with high frequency impulsive source

SPLICING OF TIME OPTIMAL CONTROLS

Differential Equations

Haar Wavelet Operational Matrix Method for Solving Fractional Partial Differential Equations

Analytic Model and Bilateral Approximation for Clocked Comparator

Optimal Investment under Dynamic Risk Constraints and Partial Information

ψ(t) = V x (0)V x (t)

Improved Approximate Solutions for Nonlinear Evolutions Equations in Mathematical Physics Using the Reduced Differential Transform Method

STATE-SPACE MODELLING. A mass balance across the tank gives:

A variational radial basis function approximation for diffusion processes.

Comparison between the Discrete and Continuous Time Models

An recursive analytical technique to estimate time dependent physical parameters in the presence of noise processes

Excel-Based Solution Method For The Optimal Policy Of The Hadley And Whittin s Exact Model With Arma Demand

Numerical Dispersion

From Particles to Rigid Bodies

PENALIZED LEAST SQUARES AND PENALIZED LIKELIHOOD

L07. KALMAN FILTERING FOR NON-LINEAR SYSTEMS. NA568 Mobile Robotics: Methods & Algorithms

Sequential Importance Resampling (SIR) Particle Filter

THE EFFECT OF SUCTION AND INJECTION ON UNSTEADY COUETTE FLOW WITH VARIABLE PROPERTIES

Solving a System of Nonlinear Functional Equations Using Revised New Iterative Method

Multi-component Levi Hierarchy and Its Multi-component Integrable Coupling System

Financial Econometrics Kalman Filter: some applications to Finance University of Evry - Master 2

Primal-Dual Splitting: Recent Improvements and Variants

Optimizing heat exchangers

Math 10B: Mock Mid II. April 13, 2016

On the Separation Theorem of Stochastic Systems in the Case Of Continuous Observation Channels with Memory

THE FOURIER-YANG INTEGRAL TRANSFORM FOR SOLVING THE 1-D HEAT DIFFUSION EQUATION. Jian-Guo ZHANG a,b *

Application of a Stochastic-Fuzzy Approach to Modeling Optimal Discrete Time Dynamical Systems by Using Large Scale Data Processing

Continuous Time. Time-Domain System Analysis. Impulse Response. Impulse Response. Impulse Response. Impulse Response. ( t) + b 0.

Stability and Bifurcation in a Neural Network Model with Two Delays

0.1 MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION EXPLAINED

dt = C exp (3 ln t 4 ). t 4 W = C exp ( ln(4 t) 3) = C(4 t) 3.

Model Reduction for Dynamical Systems Lecture 6

Energy Storage Benchmark Problems

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

A NEW TECHNOLOGY FOR SOLVING DIFFUSION AND HEAT EQUATIONS

Single-loop System Reliability-based Topology Optimization Accounting for Statistical Dependence between Limit-states

Lecture 10: Wave equation, solution by spherical means

T L. t=1. Proof of Lemma 1. Using the marginal cost accounting in Equation(4) and standard arguments. t )+Π RB. t )+K 1(Q RB

A combined space discrete algorithm with a Taylor series by time for CFD

Time series model fitting via Kalman smoothing and EM estimation in TimeModels.jl

arxiv: v1 [math.na] 26 Sep 2017

Excerpted Preprint Section

Structural Break Detection for a Class of Nonlinear Time Series Models

Structural Break Detection in Time Series Models

Numerical Methods for Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Optimization of Linear Control Systems

Simulation-Solving Dynamic Models ABE 5646 Week 2, Spring 2010

Math-Net.Ru All Russian mathematical portal

Kalman filtering for maximum likelihood estimation given corrupted observations.

RL Lecture 7: Eligibility Traces. R. S. Sutton and A. G. Barto: Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction 1

Open loop vs Closed Loop. Example: Open Loop. Example: Feedforward Control. Advanced Control I

arxiv: v1 [math.oc] 27 Jul 2009

Fractional Method of Characteristics for Fractional Partial Differential Equations

EMS SCM joint meeting. On stochastic partial differential equations of parabolic type

Pade and Laguerre Approximations Applied. to the Active Queue Management Model. of Internet Protocol

2. Nonlinear Conservation Law Equations

Design Tolerance Optimization using LS-OPT

LOCAL A POSTERIORI ERROR ESTIMATES FOR TIME-DEPENDENT HAMILTON-JACOBI EQUATIONS

Chapter 3 Boundary Value Problem

APPLICATION OF CHEBYSHEV APPROXIMATION IN THE PROCESS OF VARIATIONAL ITERATION METHOD FOR SOLVING DIFFERENTIAL- ALGEBRAIC EQUATIONS

t dt t SCLP Bellman (1953) CLP (Dantzig, Tyndall, Grinold, Perold, Anstreicher 60's-80's) Anderson (1978) SCLP

MATH 5720: Gradient Methods Hung Phan, UMass Lowell October 4, 2018

Structural Break Detection in Time Series Models

Transcription:

Space-ime Galerkin POD for opimal conrol of Burgers equaion Manuel Baumann Peer Benner Jan Heiland April 27, 207 Absolvenen Seminar Numerische Mahemaik, TU Berlin

Ouline. Inroducion 2. Opimal Space Time Produc Bases 3. Relaion o POD 4. Space-Time Galerkin-POD for Opimal Conrol Jan Heiland Space-ime Galerkin POD 2/9

Inroducion ẋ = f (, ) Consider he soluion of a PDE: L 2 (I ; L 2 (Ω)) and is numerical approimaion: wih I R... he ime-inerval Ω R n... he spaial domain S Y wih S L 2 (I )... discreized ime Y L 2 (Ω)... a FE space Task: Find Ŝ S and Ŷ Y of much smaller dimension o epress. Jan Heiland Space-ime Galerkin POD 3/9

Space-Time Spaces Consider finie dimensional subspaces S = span{ψ,, ψ s } L 2 (I ) Y = span{ν,, ν q } L 2 (Ω) wih he mass marices M S = [ ] (ψ i, ψ j ) L 2 and M i,j=,...,s Y = [ ] (ν i, ν j ) L 2 and he produc space S Y L 2 (I ; L 2 (Ω)). PDE soluion L 2 (I ; L 2 (Ω)) S L 2 (I )... discreized ime Y L 2 (Ω)... a FE space i,j=,...,q Jan Heiland Space-ime Galerkin POD 4/9

Space-Time Spaces We represen a funcion = s q i j ν i ψ j S Y j= i= via is mari of coefficiens X = [ i j ] j=,...,s i=,...,q Rq,s and vice versa. Jan Heiland Space-ime Galerkin POD 5/9

Opimal Bases Lemma (Opimal low-rank bases in space ) Given S Y and he associaed mari of coefficiens X. The bes-approimaing subspace Ŷ in he sense ha Π S Ŷ S Y is minimal over all subspaces of Y of dimension ˆq is given as span{ˆν i } i=,...,ˆq, where ˆν ν ˆν 2. = V q Ṱ ν 2 M /2 Y., ν q ˆνˆq where Vˆq is he mari of he ˆq leading lef singular vecors of M /2 Y XM/2 S. BM&PB&JH 6: ArXiv:6.04050 Jan Heiland Space-ime Galerkin POD 6/9

Opimal Bases The same argumens apply o he ranspose of X: Lemma (Opimal low-rank bases in ime 2 ) Given S Y and he associaed mari of coefficiens X. The bes-approimaing subspace Ŝ in he sense ha ΠŜ Y S Y is minimal over all subspaces of S of dimension ŝ is given as span{ ˆψ j } j=,...,ŝ, where ˆψ ψ ˆψ 2 ψ 2. ˆψŝ = UṰ s M /2 S., where Uŝ is he mari of he ŝ leading righ singular vecors of M /2 Y XM/2 S. ψ s 2 BM&PB&JH 6: ArXiv:6.04050 Jan Heiland Space-ime Galerkin POD 7/9

The soluion of a spaially discreized PDE Relaion o POD : τ R q is projeced o S R q via (, ψ ) L 2... (, ψ s ) L 2 Π S Y =..... M S. ( q, ψ ) L 2... ( q, ψ s ) L 2 In he (degeneraed) case ha ψ j is a dela disribuion cenered a τ j I, he coefficien mari degeneraes o (τ )... (τ s )..... q (τ )... q (τ s ) he sandard POD snapsho mari. Jan Heiland Space-ime Galerkin POD 8/9

Secion 4 Space-Time Galerkin-POD for Opimal Conrol Jan Heiland Space-ime Galerkin POD 9/9

Targe : Sep funcion 0.5 0 0 0.3 0.7 0.5 0 0 0.3 0.7 0.5 0 0 0.3 0.7 0.5 0 0 0.3 0.7 0.5 0 0 0.3 0.7 0.5 0 0 0.3 0.7 Figure : Illusraion of he sae, he adjoin, and he arge and heir approimaion via POD-reduced space-ime bases. Jan Heiland Space-ime Galerkin POD 0/9

Targe 2: Hear shape 0.0 0.3 0.6.0 0 0.3 0.6 0.0 0.3 0.6.0 0 0.3 0.6 0.0 0.3 0.6.0 0 0.3 0.6 0.0 0.3 0.6.0 0 0.3 0.6 0.0 0.3 0.6.0 0 0.3 0.6 0.0 0.3 0.6.0 0 0.3 0.6 Figure : Illusraion of he sae, he adjoin, and he arge and heir approimaion via POD-reduced space-ime bases. Jan Heiland Space-ime Galerkin POD /9

Space-Time Galerkin-POD for Opimal Conrol For a arge rajecory L 2 (0, T ; L 2 (Ω)) and a penalizaion parameer α > 0, consider J (, u) := 2 2 L 2 + α 2 u 2 L 2 subjec o he generic PDE min u L 2 (0,T ;L 2 (Ω)) ẋ + N() = f + u, (0) = 0. (FWD) If he nonlineariy is smooh, hen necessary opimaliy condiions for (, u) are given hrough u = αλ, where λ solves he adjoin equaion λ λ + D N() T λ + =, λ(t ) = 0. (BWD) Jan Heiland Space-ime Galerkin POD 2/9

Space-Time Galerkin-POD for Opimal Conrol Algorihm:. Do sandard forward/backward solves o compue he mari of measuremens for and λ. 2. Compue opimal low-dimensional spaces Ŝ, ˆR, Ŷ, and ˆΛ for he space and ime discreizaion of he sae and he adjoin sae λ. 3. Solve he space-ime Galerkin projeced necessary opimaliy condiions (FWD)-(BWD) 3 for he reduced cosae ˆλ. 4. Define he subopimal conrol via û = α ˆλ and inflae i o he full space. 5. Apply i in he full order simulaion. 3 (FWD)-(BWD) is a wo-poin boundary value problem wih iniial and erminal condiions for which ime sepping schemes like RKM do no apply. Jan Heiland Space-ime Galerkin POD 3/9

Numerical Seup The PDE D Burger s equaion I = (0, ], Ω = (0, ) Viscosiy: ν = 5 0 3 Sepfuncion as iniial value Zero Dirichle condiions The opimizaion arge : keep he iniial sae arge 2: make a hear parameer: α = 0 3 The full model Equidisan space and ime grids S = R... 20 linear ha funcions Y = Λ... 220 linear ha funcions The reduced model Ŷ = ˆΛ... of dimension ˆq = ˆp Ŝ ˆR... of dimensions ŝ = ˆr ˆq, ˆp, ŝ, ˆr... varying n... varying 4 4 dimension of ime paramerizaion for an gradien based approach Jan Heiland Space-ime Galerkin POD 4/9

Targe : Sep funcion ˆK 24 36 48 72 96 2 ˆ 0 2 L 0.0330 0.0280 0.092 0.02 0.004 2 J (ˆ, û) 0.035 0.0309 0.0234 0.077 0.052 wallime [s] 0. 0.48.8 8.7 55 Table : Performance of he subopimal conrol versus he cumulaive dimension ˆK = ˆp + ˆq + ˆr + ŝ of he reduced bases wih ˆp = ˆq = ˆr = ŝ. (ˆq, ŝ)/(ˆp, ˆr) (6, 7) (5,0) (2,0) (0,2) (0,5) ( 7,6) 2 ˆ 0 2 L 2 0.043 0.006 0.05 0.0303 0.038 0.0357 J (ˆ, û) 0.089 0.059 0.092 0.0340 0.0353 0.0382 wallime.43 2.7.58.42 2.54. Table : Performance of he subopimal conrol versus varying disribuions of space and ime resoluions. Jan Heiland Space-ime Galerkin POD 5/9

Targe : Sep funcion (ˆq, ŝ)/(ˆp, ˆr) (6, 7) (5,0) (2,0) (0,2) (0,5) ( 7,6) 2 ˆ 0 2 L 2 0.043 0.006 0.05 0.0303 0.038 0.0357 J (ˆ, û) 0.089 0.059 0.092 0.0340 0.0353 0.0382 wallime.43 2.7.58.42 2.54. Table : Performance of he subopimal conrol versus varying disribuions of space and ime resoluions. (ˆq, n ) (3, 8) (5, 9) (6, 20) (9, 5) (20, 6) (8, 3) 2 ˆ 0 2 L 2 0.044 0.09 0.00 0.0090 0.009 0.0087 J (ˆ, û) 0.046 0.022 0.03 0.0093 0.0095 0.009 wallime 2.98 35.04 40.34 4.93 46.54 50.62 Table : Benchmark of an gradien based approach (SQP-POD-BFGS wih α = 6.25 0 5 ) Jan Heiland Space-ime Galerkin POD 6/9

Conclusion The space-ime Galerkin POD approach allows for consrucion of opimized Galerkin bases in space and ime in a funcional analyical framework The resuling space-ime Galerkin discreizaion approimaes PDEs by a small sysem of algebraic equaions and naurally eends o boundary value problems in ime can be used for efficien compuaions of (sub)opimal conrols Fuure work: Use he funcional analyical framework for error esimaes. Eploi he freedom of he choice of he measuremen funcions in Y, o produce, e.g., opimal measuremens or o compensae for sochasic perurbaions. Jan Heiland Space-ime Galerkin POD 7/9

Furher Reading and Coding M. Baumann, P. Benner, and J. Heiland. Space-Time Galerkin POD wih applicaion in opimal conrol of semi-linear parabolic parial differenial equaions. ArXiv:6.04050, Nov. 206. M. Baumann, J. Heiland, and M. Schmid. Discree inpu/oupu maps and heir relaion o POD. In P. Benner e al., ediors, Numerical Algebra, Mari Theory, Differenial-Algebraic Equaions and Conrol Theory, pages 585 608. Springer, 205. J. Heiland and M. Baumann. spaceime-galerkin-pod-bfgs-ess Pyhon/Malab implemenaion space-ime POD and BFGS for opimal conrol of Burgers equaion. 206, doi:0.528/zenodo.66339. Jan Heiland Space-ime Galerkin POD 8/9

Thank you! Thank you for your aenion! I am always open for discussion heiland@mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de www.janheiland.de gihub.com/highlando Jan Heiland Space-ime Galerkin POD 9/9