Hybrid Quantum Circuit with a Superconducting Qubit coupled to a Spin Ensemble

Similar documents
Distributing Quantum Information with Microwave Resonators in Circuit QED

Electrical quantum engineering with superconducting circuits

Dynamical Casimir effect in superconducting circuits

Synthesizing arbitrary photon states in a superconducting resonator

Doing Atomic Physics with Electrical Circuits: Strong Coupling Cavity QED

Josephson qubits. P. Bertet. SPEC, CEA Saclay (France), Quantronics group

2015 AMO Summer School. Quantum Optics with Propagating Microwaves in Superconducting Circuits I. Io-Chun, Hoi

INTRODUCTION TO SUPERCONDUCTING QUBITS AND QUANTUM EXPERIENCE: A 5-QUBIT QUANTUM PROCESSOR IN THE CLOUD

Superconducting Qubits Coupling Superconducting Qubits Via a Cavity Bus

Electrical Quantum Engineering with Superconducting Circuits

Non-linear driving and Entanglement of a quantum bit with a quantum readout

Single Microwave-Photon Detector based on Superconducting Quantum Circuits

Quantum magnonics with a macroscopic ferromagnetic sphere

10.5 Circuit quantum electrodynamics

Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics. Mark David Jenkins Martes cúantico, February 25th, 2014

Superconducting quantum bits. Péter Makk

Superconducting Qubits

Routes towards quantum information processing with superconducting circuits

Experimental Quantum Computing: A technology overview

Coherent Coupling between 4300 Superconducting Flux Qubits and a Microwave Resonator

Supercondcting Qubits

Superconducting Qubits Lecture 4

Ion trap quantum processor

Driving Qubit Transitions in J-C Hamiltonian

Lecture 2, March 1, 2018

Superconducting qubits (Phase qubit) Quantum informatics (FKA 172)

Let's Build a Quantum Computer!

Strong tunable coupling between a charge and a phase qubit

Josephson qubits. P. Bertet. SPEC, CEA Saclay (France), Quantronics group

Dipole-coupling a single-electron double quantum dot to a microwave resonator

Lecture 9 Superconducting qubits Ref: Clarke and Wilhelm, Nature 453, 1031 (2008).

Entanglement Control of Superconducting Qubit Single Photon System

Superconducting Flux Qubits: The state of the field

Quantum Optics with Electrical Circuits: Circuit QED

nano Josephson junctions Quantum dynamics in

John Stewart Bell Prize. Part 1: Michel Devoret, Yale University

Theory for investigating the dynamical Casimir effect in superconducting circuits

Synthesizing Arbitrary Photon States in a Superconducting Resonator John Martinis UC Santa Barbara

Engineering the quantum probing atoms with light & light with atoms in a transmon circuit QED system

Quantum computation with superconducting qubits

Exploring parasitic Material Defects with superconducting Qubits

Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics with Superconducting Circuits

Quantum Optics with Electrical Circuits: Strong Coupling Cavity QED

Amplification, entanglement and storage of microwave radiation using superconducting circuits

Supplementary information for Quantum delayed-choice experiment with a beam splitter in a quantum superposition

Entangled Macroscopic Quantum States in Two Superconducting Qubits

Magnetic Resonance at the quantum limit and beyond

Controlling the Interaction of Light and Matter...

Circuit QED with electrons on helium:

Lecture 2, March 2, 2017

Superconducting Resonators and Their Applications in Quantum Engineering

SUPERCONDUCTING QUANTUM BITS

10.5 Circuit quantum electrodynamics

Parity-Protected Josephson Qubits

Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics

Magnetic Resonance in Quantum Information

Quantum optics and optomechanics

CIRCUIT QUANTUM ELECTRODYNAMICS WITH ELECTRONS ON HELIUM

Lecture 11, May 11, 2017

Lecture 8, April 12, 2017

Superconducting Qubits. Nathan Kurz PHYS January 2007

Supplementary Information for Controlled catch and release of microwave photon states

Metastable states in an RF driven Josephson oscillator

Room-Temperature Quantum Sensing in CMOS: On-Chip Detection of Electronic Spin States in Diamond Color Centers for Magnetometry

Nuclear spins in semiconductor quantum dots. Alexander Tartakovskii University of Sheffield, UK

Introduction to Quantum Mechanics of Superconducting Electrical Circuits

Remote entanglement of transmon qubits

Quantum computation and quantum optics with circuit QED

Magnetic Resonance in Quantum

Dispersive Readout, Rabi- and Ramsey-Measurements for Superconducting Qubits

Lecture 2: Double quantum dots

Electrical quantum engineering with superconducting circuits

Quantum computation and quantum information

Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits

Superconducting Circuits and Quantum Information

Superconducting quantum circuit research -building blocks for quantum matter- status update from the Karlsruhe lab

Hyperfine Interaction Estimation of Nitrogen Vacancy Center in Diamond

Superconducting phase qubits

Matter wave interferometry beyond classical limits

From SQUID to Qubit Flux 1/f Noise: The Saga Continues

Condensed Matter Without Matter Quantum Simulation with Photons

Quantum Optics with Propagating Microwaves in Superconducting Circuits. Io-Chun Hoi 許耀銓

Synthesising arbitrary quantum states in a superconducting resonator

Towards quantum simulator based on nuclear spins at room temperature

Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics (QED): Coupling a Harmonic Oscillator to a Qubit

arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 18 May 2016

arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 27 Feb 2007

Introduction to Circuit QED

Photoelectric readout of electron spin qubits in diamond at room temperature

Tunable Resonators for Quantum Circuits

Optically-controlled controlled quantum dot spins for quantum computers

Experimental Demonstration of Spinor Slow Light

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Circuit-QED-enhanced magnetic resonance

SUPERCONDUCTING QUBITS

Interaction between surface acoustic waves and a transmon qubit

Exploring the quantum dynamics of atoms and photons in cavities. Serge Haroche, ENS and Collège de France, Paris

Theoretical design of a readout system for the Flux Qubit-Resonator Rabi Model in the ultrastrong coupling regime

Metallic magnetic calorimeters. Andreas Fleischmann Heidelberg University

Topologicaly protected abelian Josephson qubits: theory and experiment.

Transcription:

Hybrid Quantum Circuit with a Superconducting Qubit coupled to a Spin Ensemble, Cécile GREZES, Andreas DEWES, Denis VION, Daniel ESTEVE, & Patrice BERTET Quantronics Group, SPEC, CEA- Saclay Collaborating with: J. ISOYA (University of Tsukuba, Japan), V. JACQUES, A. DREAU, J.- F. ROCH (ENS- Cachan, France), I. DINIZ, A. AUFFEVES (CNRS- Grenoble, France)

Outline Superconducting quantum circuit: - qubit & resonator Strong coupling of a spin ensemble to a superconducting resonator: - as a first step towards superconducting hybrid quantum circuit Hybrid quantum circuit with a qubit coupled to NVs: - storage and retrieval of quantum state from/to qubit to/ from NVs

Quantum electronic (integrated) circuit = Harmonic oscillator k m k m [x,p] = - iħ In circuit 0 1 2 k B T << ħω High Q factor E L = 1 LC LC resonator Φ +Q - Q C [Φ,Q] = - iħ For details, see e.g., Devoret and Martinis, Quantum Inform. Processing 3, 163 (2004) Superconductor 2 DOS Low loss Macroscopic degrees of freedom Superconducting gap (>~ 100 GHz)

Superconducting qubit: Josephson junction Josephson junction(s): non- linear & non- dissipative inductance H q = Q2 2C I 0 2e cos 2 0 1.7 nm Al AlOx Al I = I 0 sin d dt = 2eV DC Josephson AC Josephson I 0 : critical current of Junction : Phase difference Unharmonic potential Lowest 2 states as a qubit Review (e.g.): Clerke and Wilhelm, Nature 453, 1031 (2008)

Coupling qubits to microwave photons Co- planar waveguide GND plane 5 µm GND plane ~1 cm Low loss Large vacuum fluctuation Wallraff et al., Nature 431 162 (2004) Superconducting co- planar waveguide (CPW) Resonator STRONG COUPLING Superconducting Qubit (Artificial atom)

The hybrid way for Quantum Information Superconducting qubits Design flexibility Scalability Tunability large coupling(s) : fast manipulation Irreproducibility Short coherence time (~< 100μs) Microscopic system: atoms, ions, spins Long coherence times µ- waves to optical frequencies Reproducibility Nature given Small couplings: slow Limited scalability 1µ Quantum processor Wallraff et al., 2004 Idea : Take only the best of both worlds Superconducting resonator Quantum memory Kubo et al., PRL 105, 140502 (2010) Quantum Interface (Bus)

Which microscopic system?: NV- centers in diamond Together with SC qubits: technical constraints working on ~mk (in a dilution fridge) Low B (<< kg for Al films) Our choice: e- spin of Nitrogen- Vacancy centers (NV center) 2.88 GHz Spin triplet (S = 1) with Zero- field splitting - No need of high B to obtain ~GHz ESR frequency - Polarization at dilution fridge temperature Long coherence time (T 2 ~ ms @ room T!) Solid: naturally trapped in a crystal - No need of any (difficult) trapping technique

Spin states of NV- centers: Zeeman & Hyperfine V N n-spin e-spin m s = ±1 +1-1 Hyperfine structure due to 14 N n- spin B NV 2.88GHz S = 1 I = 1 m s =0 m I = +1, - 1, 0 H/ = DS 2 z + E(S 2 x S 2 y) g e µ B B NV S +S A I Zero- field spli/ng Zeeman shi5 Hyperfine

Spin states of NV- centers: Zeeman & Hyperfine Ensemble measurement m s = - 1 m s = +1 V N n-spin e-spin B NV Acostaet al,prb 80, 115202 (2009) H/ = DS 2 z + E(S 2 x S 2 y) g e µ B B NV S +S A I Zero- field spli/ng Zeeman shi5 Hyperfine

Coupling a single NV center to a resonator Coupling constant: g/2 = g NV µ B B 0 h z y x x y z Br single NV - resonator Hamiltonian : x Vacuum magne>c field above the surface y with g/2π 11 Hz Not enough!! y (µm)

Collective enhancement of coupling constant N- Spin- resonator Hamiltonian : 1 1 0 resonator Harmonic oscillator 2 0 with N = 10 12 (10 18 cm - 3 ) ~ 10 MHz Strong coupling regime accessible Need many spins (NVs) dirty diamond Inhomogeneous broadening: Kurucz et al, PRA 83, 053852 (2011) Diniz et al, PRA 84, 063810 (2011)

The quantum bus: frequency tunable resonator SQUID: Superconducting loop interrupted by 2 Josephson junctions δ 1 δ 2 Φ Flux quantization 0 = /2e DC Josephson effect 2 µm Φ B r GND SIS junction (Al/AlO x /Al) I = I c sin I c ( )=2I c0 cos ( / 0 ) I c 2.95 r = 1 CL( ) Linear regime: tunableinductor Φ ω r / 2π (GHz) 2.90 2.85 2.80-1.0-0.5 0 Φ / Φ 0

Tunable Resonator: implementation Nb on SiO 2 /Si chip Br 10#µm# Superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUID) Coupling capacitor

Measurement setup Isolators

Strong coupling of a spin ensemble to µ- w photons 2.95 2.90 Without diamond 40mK ω / 2π (GHz) 2.85 2.80 2.75 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 Φ / Φ 0

Strong coupling of a spin ensemble to µ- w photons 2.95 2.90-32 db With diamond 40mK ω / 2π (GHz) 2.85 S 21 (db) B NV 2.80 2.75 0.99 mt 0.2 0.3 0.4-70 db Φ / Φ 0

Strong coupling of a spin ensemble to µ- w photons 2.95 2.90-32 db With diamond 40mK ω / 2π (GHz) 2.85 S 21 (db) B NV 2.80 2.75 0.99 mt 0.20 2 0.3 0 3 0.40 4-70 db Φ / Φ 0

Strong coupling of a spin ensemble to µ- w photons 2.95 2.90-32 db With diamond 40mK ω / 2π (GHz) 2.85 S 21 (db) B NV 2.80 2.75 0.99 mt 0.20 2 0.3 0 3 0.40 4-70 db Kubo et al., PRL 105 140502 (2010) See also Schuster et al., PRL 105 140501 (2010) Amsuss et al, PRL 107 060502 (2011) Bushev et al., PRB(R) 84 060501 (2011) Φ / Φ 0 Reso Spin +1> Spin - 1>

The hybrid quantum circuit Transmon qubit Bus resonator B 1 e Q R single- shot JBA readout Qubit drive & readout resonator NV NV ensemble Frequency- tuning by flux ω r / 2π (GHz) 2.95 2.90 2.85 F g 2.80-1.0-0.5 0 Φ / Φ 0

Device photos 1 mm The diamond 1 2 HPHT e- irradiated [NV- ] ~ 13 ppm, [N] ~ 13 ppm Prof. J. ISOYA (Univ. Tsukuba) F 50 µm m 0.1 mm Transmon qubit SQUID for bus- frequency tuning External coil Printed circuit board 1 2 F BNV // [111] BNV 30 mk

Device characterization: spectroscopy Bus transmission S21 Q 1 B 2 2.95 NV -40 R //[1,1,1] III I 1 isolated bond & 3 degenerated bonds +1-1 2.85-1 2.62 0.5 Qubit 0 2.57 0.30-70 Pe BNV Frequency, ω/2π (GHz) 2.90 S21 (db) ms=+1 0.35 0.42 Flux, Φ/Φ0

Pulse sequences Duration t Readout Rabi JBA switching probability Psw Qubit characterization: Rabi, T1, & T2 t 0.8 wait time t T1 Readout π/2 with small detuning T2 evolution time t Q 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 π Readout π π/2 100 200 300 400 Microwave pulse duration t (ns) 500 T1qubit = 1.75 µs T2qubit = 2.2 µs Readout

Coupling qubit to spin ensemble: single photon swap B 1 Q R NV F e> g> Qubit Bus Spins Qubit pump- up Interaction Measurement >? = 1 3 < ; = *@ABC

Coupling qubit to spin ensemble: single photon swap B 1 Q R NV F e> g> Qubit Bus Spins Qubit pump- up Interaction Measurement >? = 1 3 < ; = *@ABC

Coupling qubit to spin ensemble: single photon swap B 1 Q R NV F e> g> Qubit Bus Spins Qubit pump- up Interaction Measurement >? = 1 3 < ; = *@ABC

Coupling qubit to spin ensemble: single photon swap B 1 Q R NV F e> g> Qubit Bus Spins Qubit pump- up Interaction Measurement >? = 1 3 < ; = *@ABC

Coupling qubit to spin ensemble: single photon swap B 1 Q R NV F e> g> Qubit Bus Spins Qubit pump- up Interaction Measurement >? = 1 3 < ; = *@ABC

Single photon swap between qubit and spins BNV -40 Frequency, ω/2π (GHz) 2.90-1 2.85 I - 1 storage/retrieval of a SINGLE microwave photon into/from a spin ensemble Y. Kubo et al., PRL 107, 220501 (2011). See also Zhu et al. Nature 478 221 (2011). S21 (db) III -70 Qubit excited state probability, Pe 2.95 0.4 1B, 0N V 0B, 1N V 1B, 0N V τs,i 0.2 0 Pe(τr)/Pe(0) = 7 % for single bond τr,i 200 400 Interaction time,τ (ns) 600 Theory with 1.6 MHz ESR linewidth (inhomogeneous broadening) by I. Diniz & A. Auffeves

Single photon swap between qubit and spins BNV -40 Frequency, ω/2π (GHz) 2.90-1 2.85 I - 1 Low fidelity: oscillation suppressed by beatings due to 14N hyperfine structure Y. Kubo et al., PRL 107, 220501 (2011). See also Zhu et al. Nature 478 221 (2011). S21 (db) III -70 Qubit excited state probability, Pe 2.95 Pe(τr)/Pe(0) = 14 % for triple bond 0.4 τs,iii 0.2 0 τr,iii 200 400 Interaction time, τ (ns) 600 Theory with 2.4 MHz ESR linewidth (inhomogeneous broadening) by I. Diniz & A. Auffeves

Storage/retrieval of quantum coherence ( + )/ 2 g> e> g> e> State preparation NV X( /2) Qubit Interaction Bus Spins Tomography Measurement I, X,Y R Q B

Storage/retrieval of quantum coherence ( + )/ 2 g> e> g> e> State preparation NV X( /2) Qubit Interaction Bus Spins Tomography Measurement I, X,Y R Q B

Storage/retrieval of quantum coherence ( + )/ 2 g> e> g> e> State preparation NV X( /2) Qubit Interaction Bus Spins Tomography Measurement I, X,Y R Q B

Storage/retrieval of quantum coherence ( + )/ 2 g> e> g> e> State preparation NV X( /2) Qubit Interaction Bus Spins Tomography Measurement I, X,Y R Q B

Storage/retrieval of quantum coherence ( + )/ 2 g> e> g> e> State preparation NV X( /2) Qubit Interaction Bus Spins Tomography Measurement I, X,Y R Q B

Storage/retrieval of quantum coherence ( + )/ 2 g> e> g> e> State preparation NV X( /2) Qubit Interaction Bus Spins Tomography Measurement I, X,Y R Q B

Quantum state tomography of retrieved state I, X,Y X( /2) Q R aswap B 0.4 State tomography by no pulse (I), π/2(x), π/2(y) No coherence left 0.4 τs,i <σ x> 0.0 180 π/2(x) -0.2 0 π shifts X π/2(y) e> -0.4 0 > -0.2 0 -<σ y> ac 0.2i n0 (n 100 200 300 Interaction time τ (ns) PRL 107, 220501 (2011) 2 ρge g> 0.2 Coherence retrieved! 0.2 τr,i (20%) arg(ρge) NV -180 400

Spin- Photon entanglement Single photon swap >? ; = *@ABC = 1 3 < Qubit excited state probability, P e 0.4 0.2 0 1 B, 0 NV τ π/2 0 B, 1 NV 200 400 600 Interaction time,τ (ns) Spin- photon entanglement at the half- swap time τ π/2 ( 1 B, 0 NV + 0 B, 1 NV )/ 2

Spin- Photon entanglement Excited state probability, Pe 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 5 0 NV Q B aswap /2 /2 R Spin- photon entangled state: ( 1 B, 0 NV + e i 0 B, 1 NV )/ 2 Theory with 1.6 MHz ESR linewidth 200 400 Delay time, τ (ns) T 2 * ~ 200 ns: limited by inhomogeneous broadening of the spin ensemble FFT amp (a.u.) 30 35 40 45 Frequency (MHz) 600 Hyperfine structure!

Summary & Perspective Hybrid quantum circuit with a superconducting qubit coherently coupled to an ensemble of NV centers in a diamond (first step towards quantum memory for microwave photons) Low fidelity due to small coupling constant and inhomogeneous broadening of the spins To improve: more spins and narrower linewidth (=less residual nitrogens, i.e., full conversion into NVs) Next step: Refocusing (spin echo) to really benefit the long coherence time of NV centers