The Power of the KPSS Test for Cointegration when Residuals are Fractionally Integrated 1

Similar documents
Darmstadt Discussion Papers in Economics

Monitoring Euro Area Real Exchange Rates

Nonsense Regressions due to Neglected Time-varying Means

Lecture 5: Unit Roots, Cointegration and Error Correction Models The Spurious Regression Problem

Testing for non-stationarity

This chapter reviews properties of regression estimators and test statistics based on

The Seasonal KPSS Test When Neglecting Seasonal Dummies: A Monte Carlo analysis. Ghassen El Montasser, Talel Boufateh, Fakhri Issaoui

Bootstrapping Long Memory Tests: Some Monte Carlo Results

Testing the null of cointegration with structural breaks

Moreover, the second term is derived from: 1 T ) 2 1

Time Series Analysis. James D. Hamilton PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY

BCT Lecture 3. Lukas Vacha.

Residual-Based Tests for Cointegration and Multiple Deterministic Structural Breaks: A Monte Carlo Study

Time Series Analysis. James D. Hamilton PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY

A PANIC Attack on Unit Roots and Cointegration. July 31, Preliminary and Incomplete

Bootstrapping Long Memory Tests: Some Monte Carlo Results

A simple nonparametric test for structural change in joint tail probabilities SFB 823. Discussion Paper. Walter Krämer, Maarten van Kampen

Econometrics I. Professor William Greene Stern School of Business Department of Economics 25-1/25. Part 25: Time Series

Long memory and changing persistence

Trend and initial condition in stationarity tests: the asymptotic analysis

EC821: Time Series Econometrics, Spring 2003 Notes Section 9 Panel Unit Root Tests Avariety of procedures for the analysis of unit roots in a panel

On the Long-Run Variance Ratio Test for a Unit Root

A Test of Cointegration Rank Based Title Component Analysis.

ROBUST TESTS ON FRACTIONAL COINTEGRATION 1

On detection of unit roots generalizing the classic Dickey-Fuller approach

Forthcoming, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. Current Version: July 25, 1999 CRITICAL VALUES FOR COINTEGRATION TESTS

Testing for a break in persistence under long-range dependencies and mean shifts

ARDL Cointegration Tests for Beginner

Univariate, Nonstationary Processes

Nonstationary Time Series:

Lecture 8a: Spurious Regression

A Gaussian IV estimator of cointegrating relations Gunnar Bårdsen and Niels Haldrup. 13 February 2006.

Cointegration and the joint con rmation hypothesis

On Consistency of Tests for Stationarity in Autoregressive and Moving Average Models of Different Orders

A New Approach to Robust Inference in Cointegration

Response surface models for the Elliott, Rothenberg, Stock DF-GLS unit-root test

SEARCHING FOR FRACTIONAL EVIDENCE USING COMBINED UNIT ROOT TESTS. Francesc Marmol Universidad Carlos III de Madrid

Lecture 8a: Spurious Regression

A Simple Test for Spurious Regression

Residual-based tests for cointegration and multiple deterministic structural breaks: A Monte Carlo study

The Spurious Regression of Fractionally Integrated Processes

LONG MEMORY AND FORECASTING IN EUROYEN DEPOSIT RATES

Response surface models for the Elliott, Rothenberg, Stock DF-GLS unit-root test

Supplemental Material for KERNEL-BASED INFERENCE IN TIME-VARYING COEFFICIENT COINTEGRATING REGRESSION. September 2017

The exact bias of S 2 in linear panel regressions with spatial autocorrelation SFB 823. Discussion Paper. Christoph Hanck, Walter Krämer

On the robustness of cointegration tests when series are fractionally integrated

Unit-Root Tests and the Burden of Proof

Convergence of prices and rates of in ation

Finite Sample Performance of A Minimum Distance Estimator Under Weak Instruments

Econometric Methods for Panel Data

On spurious regressions with trending variables

Testing for a break in persistence under long-range dependencies. Philipp Sibbertsen and Robinson Kruse Abstract

Volume 31, Issue 1. The "spurious regression problem" in the classical regression model framework

Nonstationary Panels

Department of Economics, UCSD UC San Diego

Asymptotic Least Squares Theory: Part II

Modeling water flow of the Rhine River using seasonal long memory

OUTWARD FDI, DOMESTIC INVESTMENT AND INFORMAL INSTITUTIONS: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA WAQAR AMEER & MOHAMMED SAUD M ALOTAISH

Bootstrapping Heteroskedasticity Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator

strucchange: An R Package for Testing for Structural Change in Linear Regression Models

Nonlinear minimization estimators in the presence of cointegrating relations

E 4101/5101 Lecture 9: Non-stationarity

by Ye Cai and Mototsugu Shintani

ORTHOGONALITY TESTS IN LINEAR MODELS SEUNG CHAN AHN ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY ABSTRACT

Volume 03, Issue 6. Comparison of Panel Cointegration Tests

Economic modelling and forecasting. 2-6 February 2015

Per capita output convergence: the Dickey-Fuller test under the simultaneous presence of stochastic and deterministic trends

The Generalized Cochrane-Orcutt Transformation Estimation For Spurious and Fractional Spurious Regressions

Tests for Cointegration, Cobreaking and Cotrending in a System of Trending Variables

Final Exam November 24, Problem-1: Consider random walk with drift plus a linear time trend: ( t

Title. Description. Quick start. Menu. stata.com. xtcointtest Panel-data cointegration tests

Rank tests for short memory stationarity

1 Estimation of Persistent Dynamic Panel Data. Motivation

AUTOCORRELATION. Phung Thanh Binh

A New Nonlinear Unit Root Test with Fourier Function

ECON 4160, Spring term Lecture 12

Econometrics II - EXAM Answer each question in separate sheets in three hours

Vector error correction model, VECM Cointegrated VAR

(Y jz) t (XjZ) 0 t = S yx S yz S 1. S yx:z = T 1. etc. 2. Next solve the eigenvalue problem. js xx:z S xy:z S 1

APPLIED TIME SERIES ECONOMETRICS

A Panel Test of Purchasing Power Parity. under the Null of Stationarity.

Regression with time series

Lectures on Structural Change

Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Time Series Models: A Score-Marked Empirical Process Approach

Cointegration tests of purchasing power parity

Spurious regression and econometric trends

Volume 29, Issue 1. Price and Wage Setting in Japan: An Empirical Investigation

Dynamic Regression Models (Lect 15)

Unit Roots and Structural Breaks in Panels: Does the Model Specification Matter?

Discussion Papers. Long Memory and Fractional Integration in High Frequency Financial Time Series. Guglielmo Maria Caporale Luis A.

Birkbeck Working Papers in Economics & Finance

Business Topics. Patrick Minford October 2009

Extreme Values and Local Power for KPSS Tests

Unit Roots in Time Series with Changepoints

The Role of "Leads" in the Dynamic Title of Cointegrating Regression Models. Author(s) Hayakawa, Kazuhiko; Kurozumi, Eiji

11/18/2008. So run regression in first differences to examine association. 18 November November November 2008

GLS detrending and unit root testing

Modelling of Economic Time Series and the Method of Cointegration

SFB 823. A simple and focused backtest of value at risk. Discussion Paper. Walter Krämer, Dominik Wied

TESTS OF SHORT MEMORY WITH THICK TAILED ERRORS. Christine Amsler Michigan State University. Peter Schmidt Michigan State University.

Transcription:

The Power of the KPSS Test for Cointegration when Residuals are Fractionally Integrated 1 by Philipp Sibbertsen 2 and Walter Krämer Fachbereich Statistik, Universität Dortmund, D-44221 Dortmund, Germany Version April 2004 Abstract We show that the power of the KPSS-test against integration, as measured by divergence rates of the test statistic under the alternative, remains the same when residuals from an OLS-regression rather than true observations are used. This is in stark contrast to residual based tests of the null of integration in a cointegration setting, where power is drastically reduced when residuals are used. JEL-numbers: C12, C32. Keywords: cointegration, power, long memory, KPSS-Test. 1 Research supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft under SFB 475 2 Corresponding author: Phone: +49-231- 755-3886, Fax: +49-231- 755-5284 e-mail: sibberts@statistik.uni-dortmund.de 1

1 Introduction and Summary This paper is concerned with the Kwiatkowski Phillips Schmidt Shin (1992, KPSS) procedure for testing the null hypothesis that there is at least one cointegrating relationship among m I(1) variables z t1,..., z tm. If all potential cointegrating relationships are known, this simply amounts to applying the standard KPSS test to these relationships. If a cointegrating relationship has to be estimated, one applies the KPSS test to the residuals from this regression. Lee and Schmidt (1996) show that the KPSS test statistic diverges when the residuals from the cointegrating relationship are I(d) processes with 0.5 < d < 0.5; Marmol (1997) shows that the KPSS test is also consistent against I(d) processes with d 0.5. However, both Lee and Schmidt (1996) and Marmol (1997) assume that the true cointegrating relationship is known. The case where the cointegrating relationship has to be estimated has been considered in great detail by Phillips and Ouliaris (1990), but only for tests of the complementary null hypothesis that there is no cointegration. Below we consider the null hypothesis that cointegration does exist. It emerges that the divergence rates under the alternatives from Lee and Schmidt (1996) and Marmol (1997) remain the same. We also prove that the divergence rate does not depend on the order of the cointegrating regressors. This is a rather surprising result, and in stark contrast to the case of residual based tests of the null hyposthesis of no cointegration, where power is drastically reduced when regression residuals rather than true cointegration errors are used (Krämer and Marmol 2004). 2

2 Power under the alternative We consider the regression model y t = β z t + u t, (1) where the m-vector z t is defined by z t = t s=1 x s and x s I(d X ). This implies that z t I(1 + d X ) and that all elements of the m-vector of regressors are integrated to the same order. We then postulate that y t I(1 + d X ), but that u t I(d u ) where 1/2 < d u < 1/2 < 1 + d X, implying what is called fractional cointegration. We consider the null hypothesis that there is exactly one cointegrating relationship. The KPSS procedure for testing this hypothesis is based on the statistic where ˆη = 1 T 2 T St 2 /s 2 (l), (2) t=1 S t = t u i ū, (3) i=1 s 2 (l) = 1 T t ū) T t=1(u 2 + 2 l T w sl (u t ū)(u t s ū) T s=1 t=s+1 (4) and where w sl = 1 s l+1 s2 (l) is the Newey West estimator of the long run variance of the residuals. Its consistency in our long memory set up follows from Hosking (1996) for l = 0. Therefore, we restrict our attention to the case l = 0 and disregard the estimation of the variance when computing the rates of divergence below. If the u t s are known and u t I(0), we have ˆη 1 d V (r) 2 dr, (5) 0 where V (r) is a standard Brownian Bridge (see Kwiatkowski et al. 1992, or Lee and Schmidt 1996 for details). We consider the limiting distribution of ˆη 3

when the residuals u t in (5) are I(d) with 0 < d u < 1. For the case where the u t s are known, and 0 < d u < 0.5, Lee and Schmidt (1996, Theorem 3) show that ˆη t = O p (T ) 2d u. (6) For the case where d u 0.5, Marmol (1997) shows that ˆη t = O p (T ), (7) so that the KPSS test is consistent against both stationary and nonstationary long memory alternatives. So far, however, it has remained an open problem whether the above divergence rates carry over to the case where the u t s are replaced by OLS residuals. We consider this case in what follows by computing the divergence rate of the KPSS-test under fractional alternatives and allowing the regressors to be likewise fractionally integrated. This extends the usual situation of I(0) regressors. But it can be shown that the structure of the regressors has no influence on the divergence rate of the test statistic. THEOREM: Assume that x t I(d x ), 1 2 < d x < 1 2 and u t I(d u ), 0 < d u < 1 + d x and that the regressors are strictly exogenous. Then the rate of divergence of the KPSS test is of order O p (T 2d u ) irrespective of d x. REMARK: In the case of endogenous regressors we have to assume also d x + d u > 0 to obtain the result. In the case of d X + d u 0 the rate of convergence of ˆβ is of order O p (T 1+2d X ) and therefore the considerations below are no longer valid. For details see Davidson (2003). PROOF: We have: û = u Z (Z Z) 1 Z u. (8) 4

From Davidson (2003) we obtain for the least squares estimator of the cointegration parameter T 1+d X d u ( ˆβ β) d M, (9) with a matrix M which is specified in Davidson (2003). In addition we obtain from Marinucci and Robinson (2000) that [λt ] T 3/2 d X z t t=1 d B d (λ), (10) where B d (λ) denotes fractional Brownian motion with parameter d = d X + 1. Using the relation û t = u t ( ˆβ β)z t (11) we obtain that T 1/2 du [λt ] t=1 u t converges in distribution to some random variable, say ξ(λ). The rate of convergence follows from (9), (10) and the application of Slutsky s Theorem to (11). The rate of convergence for the test statistic follows from the continuous mapping theorem, applying the same arguments as in Lee and Schmidt (1996). REMARK: The limiting distribution in this case is also clearly not Gaussian. Therefore, under the alternative of fractionally integrated cointegration residuals we obtain divergence rates independent of the structure of the regressors themselves. Furthermore, the limiting distribution is non-gaussian. The KPSStest is thus powerful against fractional alternatives even when the cointegrating relationship has to be estimated and whether the regressors themselves have long memory or not. 5

References Davidson, J. (2003) : Convergence to stochastic integrals with fractionally integrated integrator processes: Theory and applications to cointegrating regression. Working Paper, Cardiff Business School, Cardiff. Hosking, J. (1996) : Asymptotic distribution of the sample mean, autocovariances and autocorrelations of long-memory time series. Journal of Econometrics 73, 261 284. Krämer, W. and Marmol, F. (2004): The power of residual-based tests for cointegration when residuals are fractionally integrated. Economics Letters 82, 63 69. Kwiatkowski, D.; Phillips, P.C.B.; Schmidt, P. and Shin, Y. (1992): Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? Journal of Econometrics 54, 159 178. Lee, D. and Schmidt, P. (1996): On the power of the KPSS test of stationarity against fractionally integrated alternatives. Journal of Econometrics 73, 285 302. Marinucci, D. and Robinson, P. M. (2000): Weak convergence of multivariate fractional processes. Stochastic Processes and their applications 86, 103 120. Marmol, F. (1997): Searching for fractional evidence using unit root tests. Mimeo, Universidad Carlos III, Madrid. Phillips, P.C.B. and Ouliaris, S. (1990): Asymptotic properties of residual based tests for cointegration. Econometrica 58, 165 193. 6

Phillips, P.C.B. and Perron, P. (1988) : Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75, 335 346. 7