I R A M P. Laser-Aided Diagnostics of Oscillatory Electric Fields in Plasmas Based on the Concept of Quasienergy States REVIEW ARTICLE

Similar documents
ATOMIC AND LASER SPECTROSCOPY

Fundamentals of Spectroscopy for Optical Remote Sensing. Course Outline 2009

Radiation in the Earth's Atmosphere. Part 1: Absorption and Emission by Atmospheric Gases

Generalization of Analytical Results for Lorentz-Doppler Profiles of Hydrogen/Deuterium International Lines Science Press ISSN:

Spectral Resolution. Spectral resolution is a measure of the ability to separate nearby features in wavelength space.

Internal magnetic field measurement in tokamak plasmas using a Zeeman polarimeter

Interference effects on the probe absorption in a driven three-level atomic system. by a coherent pumping field

Single Emitter Detection with Fluorescence and Extinction Spectroscopy

Saturation Absorption Spectroscopy of Rubidium Atom

The Plasma Phase. Chapter 1. An experiment - measure and understand transport processes in a plasma. Chapter 2. An introduction to plasma physics

Optical Properties of Lattice Vibrations

Non-stationary States and Electric Dipole Transitions

Physics 221B Spring 2018 Notes 34 The Photoelectric Effect

Chapter 7 QUANTUM THEORY & ATOMIC STRUCTURE Brooks/Cole - Thomson

( r) = 1 Z. e Zr/a 0. + n +1δ n', n+1 ). dt ' e i ( ε n ε i )t'/! a n ( t) = n ψ t = 1 i! e iε n t/! n' x n = Physics 624, Quantum II -- Exam 1

Elements of Quantum Optics

Molecular spectroscopy

The interaction of light and matter

Production of Over-dense Plasmas by Launching. 2.45GHz Electron Cyclotron Waves in a Helical Device

Nonlinear Optics (WiSe 2015/16) Lecture 12: January 15, 2016

Notes on x-ray scattering - M. Le Tacon, B. Keimer (06/2015)

Bohr. Electronic Structure. Spectroscope. Spectroscope

Conceptual Physics Fundamentals

THE ABSORPTION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION IN A QUANTUM WIRE

CHEM Atomic and Molecular Spectroscopy

Quantum Theory and Atomic Structure. Quantum Mechanics. Quantum Theory and Atomic Structure. 7.3 The Wave-Particle Duality of Matter and Energy

Chapter 7. Quantum Theory and Atomic Structure. Quantum Mechanics. Chap 7-1

OPTI 511R, Spring 2018 Problem Set 10 Prof. R.J. Jones Due Thursday, April 19

NPTEL/IITM. Molecular Spectroscopy Lectures 1 & 2. Prof.K. Mangala Sunder Page 1 of 15. Topics. Part I : Introductory concepts Topics

10/17/11. Chapter 7. Quantum Theory and Atomic Structure. Amplitude (intensity) of a wave. Quantum Theory and Atomic Structure

Rb, which had been compressed to a density of 1013

Theory of optically thin emission line spectroscopy

Atomic Transitions and Selection Rules

Comparison of hollow cathode and Penning discharges for metastable He production

Lecture 25. atomic vapor. One determines how the response of the medium to the probe wave is modified by the presence of the pump wave.

Final Exam Tuesday, May 8, 2012 Starting at 8:30 a.m., Hoyt Hall Duration: 2h 30m

Okinawa School in Physics 2017 Coherent Quantum Dynamics. Cold Rydberg gases

Estimating the plasma flow in a recombining plasma from

CHM Physical Chemistry II Chapter 12 - Supplementary Material. 1. Einstein A and B coefficients

On the Claim of the Observation of Macro-quantum effects of Magnetic Vector Potential in the Classical Domain

Atomic Motion in a Laser Standing Wave

Multiple Choice Identify the letter of the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

8 Quantized Interaction of Light and Matter

12. Spectral diffusion

Recollision processes in strong-field QED

Optical and Photonic Glasses. Lecture 31. Rare Earth Doped Glasses I. Professor Rui Almeida

The Einstein A and B Coefficients

Time Resolved Faraday Rotation Measurements of Spin Polarized Currents in Quantum Wells

Answers to questions on exam in laser-based combustion diagnostics on March 10, 2006

MOLECULAR SPECTROSCOPY

Bose-Einstein Condensation and Intermediate State of the. Photon Gas. Abstract

Part I. Principles and techniques

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Laser Cooling and Trapping of Atoms

is the minimum stopping potential for which the current between the plates reduces to zero.

A more comprehensive theory was needed. 1925, Schrödinger and Heisenberg separately worked out a new theory Quantum Mechanics.

Effect of secondary beam neutrals on MSE: theory

4 FEL Physics. Technical Synopsis

MANY-PHOTON IONIZATION OF THE XENON ATOM BY RUBY LASER RADIATION

Sheared Flow Stabilization in the Z-Pinch

Calibration of and Measurements from the C-Mod MSE Diagnostic

Atomic Structure Ch , 9.6, 9.7

Outline Chapter 9 The Atom Photons Photons The Photoelectron Effect Photons Photons

Simple strategy for enhancing terahertz emission from coherent longitudinal optical phonons using undoped GaAs/n-type GaAs epitaxial layer structures

Modern Optical Spectroscopy

5.3. Physics and the Quantum Mechanical Model

ATOMIC PHYSICS. history/cosmology/tools/ tools-spectroscopy.htm CHAPTER 9 - FROM SPECTROSCOPY TO ATOMS

Electromagnetic Radiation All electromagnetic radiation travels at the same velocity: the speed of light (c), m/s.

Model Answer (Paper code: AR-7112) M. Sc. (Physics) IV Semester Paper I: Laser Physics and Spectroscopy

Physics 221 Lecture 31 Line Radiation from Atoms and Molecules March 31, 1999

Chapter 7. The Quantum Mechanical Model of the Atom

SUB-NATURAL-WIDTH N-RESONANCES OBSERVED IN LARGE FREQUENCY INTERVAL

Chapter 5 Light and Matter

Terms to Know. 10.Angular quantum number 11.Magnetic quantum number 12.Spin quantum number

The Photoelectric Effect

Limits on Tunneling Theories of Strong-Field Ionization

Chapter 8: Electrons in Atoms Electromagnetic Radiation

5-A / 9, WEA, Sat Nagar, Karol Bagh New Delhi Web:

Module 4 : Third order nonlinear optical processes. Lecture 28 : Inelastic Scattering Processes. Objectives

Hyperfine structure and isotope shift measurements on 4d 10 1 S 0 4d 9 5p J = 1 transitions in Pd I using deep-uv cw laser spectroscopy

Spectral Broadening Mechanisms. Broadening mechanisms. Lineshape functions. Spectral lifetime broadening

BMT Equation Analysis and Spin in Accelerator Physics

Electronic Structure of Atoms. Chapter 6

Design of Uniform Fiber Bragg grating using Transfer matrix method

Interaction X-rays - Matter

Scattering of light from quasi-homogeneous sources by quasi-homogeneous media

Wavelength λ Velocity v. Electric Field Strength Amplitude A. Time t or Distance x time for 1 λ to pass fixed point. # of λ passing per s ν= 1 p

NON LINEAR PULSE EVOLUTION IN SEEDED AND CASCADED FELS

Investigation of Water Fragments

CONTENTS. 2 CLASSICAL DESCRIPTION 2.1 The resonance phenomenon 2.2 The vector picture for pulse EPR experiments 2.3 Relaxation and the Bloch equations

4. Spontaneous Emission october 2016

V( x) = V( 0) + dv. V( x) = 1 2

OPTI 511, Spring 2016 Problem Set 9 Prof. R. J. Jones

Nonresonant Transparency Channels of a Two-Barrier Nanosystem in an Electromagnetic Field with an Arbitrary Strength

Electrons, Energy, & the Electromagnetic Spectrum Notes Simplified, 2-D Bohr Model: Figure 2. Figure 3 UNIT 4 - ELECTRONS & ELECTRON ARRANGEMENT

Class 30: Outline. Hour 1: Traveling & Standing Waves. Hour 2: Electromagnetic (EM) Waves P30-

Stark Broadening of Hydrogen Spectral Lines in Strongly Coupled Plasmas: Effect of the Electrostatic Plasma Turbulence at the Thermal Level

ECE 240a - Notes on Spontaneous Emission within a Cavity

Skoog Chapter 6 Introduction to Spectrometric Methods

HYPERFINE STRUCTURE CONSTANTS IN THE 102D3/2 AND 112D 3/2 STATES OF 85Rb M. GLOW

Transcription:

I R A P (), June 0, pp. 35-4 Laser-Aided Diagnostics of Oscillatory Electric Fields in Plamas Based on the Concept of Quasienergy International States Science Press ISSN: 9-359 REVIEW ARTICLE Laser-Aided Diagnostics of Oscillatory Electric Fields in Plasmas Based on the Concept of Quasienergy States V. P. GAVRILENKO AND E. OKS Center for Surface and Vacuum Research, Novatorov Street 40, korp., oscow 94, Russia and oscow Institute of Physics and Technology (State University), Institutskiy per. 9 Dolgoprudniy 4700, oscow region, Russia Physics Department, 06 Allison L., Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA ABSTRACT: ethods for the laser-assisted diagnostics of oscillatory electric fields (OEFs) in plasmas are reviewed. It is shown that several phenomena can be used for this purpose. First, a tunle laser radiation can scan both the structure of energy levels and spectral line profiles of atoms interacting with the OEFs. Second, the laser radiation can cause a saturation of the atomic transition, including the cases where the saturation parameter depends on characteristics of the OEFs. Third, the laser radiation itself can modify both the structure of energy levels and spectral line profiles in such a way that the modification would depend, in particular, on parameters of the OEFs. PACS: 3.70Jz, 3.60.+i, 3.80.-t, 5.70.Kz. INTRODUCTION Developing methods for diagnosing oscillatory electric fields (OEFs) E () t = E0cos ωt in plasmas is of a great practical importance: the OEFs control many physical processes in plasmas. The term OEF embraces both the intrinsic eigen-modes of plasmas (plasma turbulence) and extrinsic fields penetrating into plasmas from the outside. To the latter type belongs, e.g., the field of the microwave radiation used for heating in some magnetic fusion machines. Currently for diagnosing OEFs in plasmas, there are widely employed methods based on the emission spectroscopy []. As an example, we note paper [], where OEFs were revealed and studied in the peripheral plasma of the tokamak T-0 by using profiles of spontaneously emitted spectral lines of deuterium. Bringing into play a laser radiation can significantly broaden the scope of spectroscopic diagnostics of OEFs in plasmas. The advantage is the possibility of measuring OEFs with a high temporal and spatial resolutions. In the laser-assisted diagnostics of the OEF E () t, atoms in a plasma interact with both the laser field EL () t = E0Lcos ωlt and with the OEF E () t. We assume that ω <<ω L and that the frequency ω L is close to the frequency of the atomic transition between the upper and lower energy levels. In magnetic fusion machines, there are various ways for atoms to serve as sensitive probes with respect to the OEFs. First, atoms of the main filling gases (hydrogen, deuterium) can be used for diagnosing OEFs in the peripheral plasma. Second, for measuring OEFs in the core plasma one can inject neutral beams (hydrogen, deuterium, helium, litium). Besides, one can also inject pellets (containing, e.g., lithium). As an example, Fig. shows a possible geometry for the laser-assisted diagnostics of OEFs in a tokamak, where atoms of the injected neutral beam play the role of the probes. In this case, in addition to the OEF, one should also take into account the Lorentz electric field Eb = Vb B / c, where V is beam velocity and b B is the magnetic field. International Review of Atomic and olecular Physics, (), January-June 0 35

V. P. Gavrilenko & E. Oks Figure : Geometry of the observations for laser-assisted diagnostics of oscillatory electric fields in tokamak plasmas In this paper we consider physical principles that can serve as the basis for laser-assisted spectroscopic methods for diagnosing OEFs in magnetic fusion plasmas.. ABSORPTION SPECTRA OF ATOS NOT HAVING PERANENT DIPOLE OENTS The interaction of an atom with the OEF E () t can be characterized by the parameter R = dα α E 0 /[()] ω α α ± ω () where d α α is the matrix element of the dipole moment between the closely spaced levels α, α, and ω α α is the separation between these levels. If R<< (the case of a weak field E () t ), the field E () t = E0cos ωt can be measured using the fact that the excitation rate for the two-quantum process, involving one quantum ω L of the laser field EL () t = E0Lcos ωlt and one quantum ω L of the field E () t = E0cos ωt, is proportional to E. Let 0 us consider, for instance, the excitation scheme shown in Fig., where ω 3 << ω. We assume that in the electric dipole approximation, the single-photon transitions 3 and 3 are allowed, whereas the single-photon transition is forbidden. Figure : Partial scheme of energy levels of an atom. (a) The excitation of the transition Due to the sorption of a laser photon ω L and of an OEF quantum ω. (b) The excitation of the transition due to the sorption of a laser photon ω L and the emission of an OEF quantum ω 36 International Review of Atomic and olecular Physics, (), January-June 0

Laser-Aided Diagnostics of Oscillatory Electric Fields in Plamas Based on the Concept of Quasienergy States Using the quantum-mechanical perturbation theory (we assume that R<< for the levels and 3), one can obtain the excitation rates for the two-quantum transitions shown in Fig. : W = { E E d d /[8() ]}( ω + ω L ω,), ω ω γ () + 0L 0 3 3 3 L W = { E E d d /[8() ]}( ω ω L ω,). ω + ω γ () 0L 0 3 3 3 L () () + In Eqs. (), L( ω,)( γ / )/( γ ω + / 4), γ γ is the width (FWH) of the line. The value of W corresponds to () the process shown in Fig. (a), whereas the value of W corresponds to the process shown in Fig. (b). The excitation rate for the direct single-photon transition 3 induced by the laser field is as follows: W 3 = [ d3e0 L /()]( L ω,) ωl γ. (3) () ± Figure 3 shows the sorption spectrum consisting of the lines W and W 3 for the transitions (,3). One () + () () + can see that both the ratios W / W and W / W are proportional to E. Therefore, the ratios W / W 3 3 0 3 () and W / W can be used to measure E 3 O by scanning the laser frequency around the frequencies and 3 and observing the fluorescence signals at transitions originated from the levels and 3. Figure 3: Absorption spectrum for the transitions (,3) shown in Fig.. S A W 3 is the intensity of the allowed line 3; S W is the intensity of the line corresponding to the excitation scheme (a); () + + S W is the intensity of the line corresponding to the excitation scheme (b) (cf. Fig. ). The separation between the lines S_ and S + is equal to () In the case where the parameter R in Eq. () is of the order or greater than unity, the formalism of quasienergy states (QES) is more appropriate for treating the interaction of the atom with the OEF E () t. According to the Floquet theory (see, e.g., Ref. [3]), for the atom interacting with the OEF E () t = E0cos ωt, among the wave functions (WFs) of the atom, there exists a basis of the WFs of QES Φ ( r,) t = exp( iε t/) exp()() ikω t φ r n n nk k International Review of Atomic and olecular Physics, (), January-June 0 37 (4)

V. P. Gavrilenko & E. Oks where ε n is the quasienergy of the level n, and the functions φnk () r are time independent. We note that the term quasienergy states was introduced in Refs. [4,5]. The quasienergies and the functions φ () r can be obtained either numerically, or analytically by solving the Schrödinger equation. Generally they depend on the parameters of the field E () t = E0cos ω t. Taking into account Eq. (4), one can see that the excitation of the transition b a can occur when the following resonance condition is satisfied ω () ε/ ε L a b + k ω, k = 0, ±, ±,... where ε a and ε b are the quasienergies of the levels a and b, respectively. Using Eq. (4), we find that for determining the excitation rate for the transition b a, we can use the formula (3), in which the dipole matrix element d 3 should () k be replaced by the effective dipole matrix element Dba = ϕb d φak, where ϕ b is the WF of the lower level b. (We assume here that strong the OEF E () t perturbs only the upper state a.) As a result, the excitation rate for the transition b a can be expressed as W d E L k. = [ < ϕ φ > 0 /()](()/ ε ε,) ω + ω γ b a b ak L a b L Let us assume that the levels b and a coincide, respectively, with the levels and shown in Fig.. In the case ( ) of a weak OEF E (t), according to Eq. () the ratio W ( + ) / W does not depend on E. However, for the O strong OEF E (t) this ratio is a function of the parameters of the OEF. Figure 4 shows, as an example, the ratio W ( + ) W ( ) versus the amplitude of the OEF E (t), calculated for two two-quantum transitions in helium / atoms: the transitions P 4 F and 3 3 P 4 F. For helium atoms, the levels S + S+ P, 4 F, and S 4 + D (S = 0; l) play the role of the levels,, and 3 shown in Fig.. Using the dependence of n nk ( + ) / ( ) W W on the parameters of the OEF, one can measure these parameters in a plasma by observing the laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) signal at the transition from the level to some lower level q. The advantage of this method is that both the fluorescent lines originate from the same level - therefore, a possible collisional transfer of the population from the level to nearby levels does not interfere with the measurements of the OEF. ()() + Figure 4: The ratio Y = W / W versus the amplitude E O of the OEF for two two-quantum transitions in helium atoms: P 4 F (curve ) and 3 3 P 4 F (curve ). The OEF frequency in this example was.4 0 s - 38 International Review of Atomic and olecular Physics, (), January-June 0

Laser-Aided Diagnostics of Oscillatory Electric Fields in Plamas Based on the Concept of Quasienergy States 3. ABSORPTION SPECTRA OF ATOS POSSESSING PERANENT DIPOLE OENTS Let us consider laser-induced transitions in atoms possessing permanent dipole moments ( daa < ϕa d ϕ a > 0 ). Hydrogen atoms are one of the examples of such atoms. In the case where d aa 0, the WF of a QES of the atom, which is in the state a and interacts with the OEF E () t = E0cos ωt, has the form [6] Ψ ( r,) t = exp[ id E sin ω t/()]() ω ϕ r (5) a aa 0 a Let the frequency ω L of the laser radiation be close to the frequency of the transition b a. Performing the Fourier series expansion in Eq. (5) and taking into account the formula exp( ix sin)() ω exp() t = J n x inω t, where J n (x) are the Bessel functions, we find that the effective matrix element of the dipole moment between the () k levels a and b has the form: = ( β ) for ()k D D Jk d, where β () aa /() bb 0 ω, we obtain the increase of the population N a of the upper level a + n= d d E. Using the ove expression N N N = () G/[() N N ], + ω + kω ω σ τ + G a a a0 k b0 a0 L k k G 4() W J β, τ (), Γ σ = ω W g β k k k k ba k () [()()]/ k r, k + r /(), 0, 0, L,... r= g ν = J v J v r W d E k = ± ± (6) Here τ and Γ are transverse and longitudinal relaxation times, respectively. The quantity τ is inversely proportional to the impact width of the spectral line a b; the quantity Γ controls the relaxation rate of the levels a and b. In the case of a weak laser field the expression for N a in (6) simplifies to: d E J ()() β τ Γ N N N =, k = 0, ±, ±,... a 0L k b0 a0 () + ω + kω ωl τ (7) In fact, Eq. (7) determines Blokhinzew s spectrum [6], where the satellite at the frequency ω L = ω + k ω has the intensity proportional to J () β. k From Eq. (6) it follows that that in the general case the spectrum of the atomic sorption of the laser radiation consists of a set of satellites at the frequencies / the half-width of the k-th satellite being ω = () + G / τ ω L = ω + kω σ k, k = 0, ±, ±,..., (8) k,/ k. We point out that the term σ k in the denominator of the expression for N a (see Eq. (6)) is related to the dynamic Stark shift of the quasienergy levels. It depends on both the laser field, and the OEF E () t. We note that the expression for σ k was first obtained in Refs. [7, 8]. Figure 5 shows, as an example, the sorption spectrum of the laser radiation by atoms possessing the permanent dipole moments in the states a and b. It consists of the unshifted line S 0 and of the satellite lines S ±k (k =,,..). The intensity of these lines, according to Eq. (6), is the function of the amplitude E 0 of the OEF. For Fig. 5, the matrix elements of the dipole moment were assumed to be as follows: d =.5ea 0, daa dbb = 3.5ea 0 where a 0 is the Bohr radius. Profiles shown in Fig. 5 were calculated at E 0L = 5 kv/cm, E 0 = 7 kv/cm, ω =.4 0 s -. For the profile (a), the separation between the satellites S +k and S k is equal to kω. One can see from Fig. 5 that the allowance for the dynamic Stark shifts σ k can be important for calculations of the sorption spectra of atoms. International Review of Atomic and olecular Physics, (), January-June 0 39

V. P. Gavrilenko & E. Oks Equations (6) can be used for measuring the amplitude of the microwave field E 0 in plasmas. For this purpose one should record the wavelength-integrated intensity of LIF I f N during the transition from the upper level a to one of the lower levels versus the laser field intensity I E : ( f + k, satur L ) L 0L I I I, I I G () E. k, satur L k 0 Here k is the number of microwave quanta involved in the resonance (see Eq. (8)). The amplitude E 0 can be measured in two ways. In the first way, one could measure the ratio of slopes of experimental dependences I () I f L at two different values of k (k = k, and k = k ), and use the dependence of the ratio Gk / G k on E 0. In the second way, one could use the dependence of the dynamic Stark shift σ k on the parameters of the OEF E () t. By scanning the laser frequency around the frequency ω and by recording peaks of the LIF intensity, one could tune to multiquantum resonances (8) corresponding to two different indices k = k, and k = k. The laser frequency should be kept constant. In this situation one would have: ω L, = ω + k ω σk, ω L, = ω + k ω σk. (9) Since ω is known, from Eqs. (9) one would determine the dynamic Stark shifts σ k and σ k. Then, using the fact that the ratio σk / σ k depends on E 0 but does not depend on E 0L, one could finally find the OEF amplitude E 0. Figure 5: Absorption spectra of the laser radiation in the presence of the field E (t) = E 0 cos w t by atoms possessing permanent dipole moments in their states a and b. Profile (a) was calculated without the allowance for the dynamic stark shifts (DSS) k of the satellites, whereas profile (b) was calculated with the allowance for the DSS k of the satellites Now let us consider a situation where a hydrogen (or deuterium) beam travels through a magnetic fusion plasma containing OEF E () t. In this case, hydrogen atoms are subjected to the combined electric field ε ()(), t = Eb + E t where Eb = Vb B / c is the Lorentz electric field. The field Eb () t causes the static Stark splitting of the hydrogen energy level of the principal quantum number n. By a proper choice of the beam velocity, it is possible to realize the situation where this Stark splitting (in the frequency scale) coincides with the frequency ω of the OEF E () t, thus resulting in a resonance. The resonance condition has the form: 40 International Review of Atomic and olecular Physics, (), January-June 0

Laser-Aided Diagnostics of Oscillatory Electric Fields in Plamas Based on the Concept of Quasienergy States 3 ω = neb me. (0) Under the condition (0), the probility, that the hydrogen atom is in a Stark sublevel of the energy level n, oscillates at the Ri frequency, which is proportional to the OEF amplitude. This causes an additional splitting of those hydrogen spectral lines, for which the energy level n serves as the upper level or as the lower level. This additional splitting is linear with respect to the OEF amplitude. As an example, Fig. 6 shows the spectrum of the hydrogen line L α under the resonance (0) for the upper level n =. The additional splitting, being linear with respect to the OEF amplitude, can be used as sensitive tool for measuring the OEF amplitude in magnetic fusion plasmas. For tuning into the resonance (0), one should vary the beam energy. The additional splitting would manifest in the spectrum of the fluorescence excited by the laser tuned to the atomic transition, for which the level n (where n satisfies Eq. (0)) serves as the upper level or as the lower level. For an estimate, let us assume the OEF frequency ω = 8.7 0 s -, the magnetic field B = T, the hydrogen beam velocity V being orthogonal to the magnetic field b B. For fulfilling the resonance (0) for the energy level n = 3 (which is the upper level of the H α line), we find that the energy of the hydrogen beam should be 30 kev. Figure 6: Spectrum of the hydrogen line L in two orthogonal electric fields: A lorentz field E and an oscillatory field b E () t = E0cos ω t - under the resonance (0) for the level n =. The observation is perpendicular to both E and b E () t. The spectrum was calculated for two orientations of the linear polarization analyzer: parallel to E (solid line) and b parallel to E () t (dashed line). The ri frequency controlling the splitting is Ω = 3 0 E0 me 4. CONCLUSIONS In this review we presented the main physical principles that can serve as the basis for laser-assisted spectroscopic methods for diagnosing OEFs in plasmas. As atomic probes, one can use either atoms possessing permanent dipole moments (e.g., hydrogen or deuterium atoms) or atoms that do not possess permanent dipole moments (e.g., helium or lithium atoms). International Review of Atomic and olecular Physics, (), January-June 0 4

V. P. Gavrilenko & E. Oks We showed that several phenomena can be used for laser-assisted diagnostics of OEFs in magnetic fusion plasmas. First, a tunle laser radiation can scan spectral line profiles and/or the structure of energy levels of atoms interacting with OEFs. In this case, parameters of the OEFs can be deduced from the spectrum of fluorescence, resulting from the atomic transition from an excited state to a lower state. For this case we assumed that the laser intensity is relatively weak, so that it does not modify the structure of the atomic energy levels. Second, the laser radiation can cause the saturation of the atomic transition. In this case for some atomic transitions the saturation parameter depends both on the laser intensity and on the parameters of the OEF. The latter can be used for diagnosing the OEF. For this case one needs a sufficiently intense laser radiation that can cause the saturastion. Third, a combined effect of the OEF and of a strong laser field can modify both the structure of energy levels and spectral line profiles. In this case, the character of the modification is controlled by the quantity, in which parameters of both the OEF and the laser field are represented in an entangled way. Acknowledgements The research described in this publication was made possible in part by Award No RU-P-594-O-04 of the U.S. Civilian Research & Development Foundation for the Independent States of the Former Soviet Union (CRDF). References [] E. Oks, Plasma Spectroscopy. The Influence of icrowave and Laser Fields, Berlin: Springer, 995. [] V. P. Gavrilenko, E. Oks, V.A. Rantsev-Kartinov, JETP Letters 44, 07 (985). [3] N. B. Delone and V. P. Krainov, Atoms in Strong Light Fields, Berlin: Springer, 985. [4] Ja.B. Zel dovich, Sov. Phys. JETP 4, 006, (967). [5] V. I. Ritus, Sov. Phys. JETP 4, 04, (967). [6] D. I. Blochinzew, Phys. Z. Sow. Union 4, 50, (933). [7] V. P. Gavrilenko, E. Oks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3796, (995). [8] V. P. Gavrilenko, E. Oks, J. Phys. B: At. ol. Opt. Phys. 8, 433, (995). 4 International Review of Atomic and olecular Physics, (), January-June 0