Background. North Cascades Ecosystem Grizzly Bear Restoration Plan/ Environmental Impact Statement. Steve Rochetta

Similar documents
HABITAT EFFECTIVENESS AND SECURITY AREA ANALYSES

Priority areas for grizzly bear conservation in western North America: an analysis of habitat and population viability INTRODUCTION METHODS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION. No.

THE GRIZZLY BEAR RECOVERY PROGRAM: CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS ISSUES ABOUT GRIZZLY BEAR

Ecosystem Management General Goals Subgoals

An Introduction to Day Two. Linking Conservation and Transportation Planning Lakewood, Colorado August 15-16, 16, 2006

An Introduction to NatureServe Linking Conservation and Transportation Planning Phoenix, Arizona November 8 & 9, 2006

Grizzly Bear Value Summary April 2016

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (Continued)

Bombing for Biodiversity in the United States: Response to Zentelis & Lindenmayer 2015

Native species (Forbes and Graminoids) Less than 5% woody plant species. Inclusions of vernal pools. High plant diversity

Natural Resource Condition Assessments. Everglades National Park and Big Cypress National Preserve 2015

Project Primary Contact: Gregg Servheen, Idaho Department of Fish and Game, PO Box 25 Boise, ID ,

RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE AMERICAN BROWN BEAR POPULATION AND THE BIGFOOT PHENOMENON

3.3 Threats to Biodiversity

FWS PROJECT Year project

Ecological Land Cover Classification For a Natural Resources Inventory in the Kansas City Region, USA

Demography and Genetic Structure of the NCDE Grizzly Bear Population. Kate Kendall US Geological Survey Libby, MT Jan 26, 2011

9. Parashant Dark Sky Park Light Management Plan (LMP)

Intervenor-Defendants.

Rainforests and Deserts: Distribution, Uses, and Human Influences. Teacher s Masters California Education and the Environment Initiative

Kootenai River Habitat Restoration Program Update

Proposed Scope of Work Village of Farmingdale Downtown Farmingdale BOA Step 2 BOA Nomination Study / Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement

NatureServe s Federally Listed Species Location Data Play an Important Role in EPA s FIFRA Risk Assessments

Cross-border Maritime Spatial Plan for the Black sea - Romania and Bulgaria project

Greenland: Balancing the need for development and environmental protection. Arctic Frontiers 2016 Industry and Environment

Surviving the Big One: Understanding and Preparing for a Major Earthquake in Western Oregon

Atlas of the Upper Gila River Watershed

DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES WAYS & MEANS SUBCOMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES MARCH 2, 2017

Case Study: Ecological Integrity of Grasslands in the Apache Highlands Ecoregion

Mobrand to Jones and Stokes. Sustainable Fisheries Management Use of EDT

LANDS OF ICE AND BLOOD BARBARIAN OF ROME CHRONICLES 3

Legal problems of environmental management. Spatial planning and space management. M. Gajewski 2014 / 2015

cooperating sites as the three initial units of a new Southern Appalachian Biosphere Reserve, approved by UNESCO in 1988.

Study Overview. the nassau hub study. The Nassau Hub

Chapter 32. Australia & New Zealand

Most people used to live like this

CONFERENCE STATEMENT

Geologic Management. Contents

The Arctic Landscape Conservation Cooperative Conservation Goals

15 March 2010 Re: Draft Native Vegetation of the Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority Area GIS layers and explanatory reports

Section 2. Indiana Geographic Information Council: Strategic Plan

Chapter 32. Australia & New Zealand

KENYA NATIONAL BUREAU OF STATISTICS Workshop on

II. Resource benefits. Å. Native Fish

Columbia Estuary Province

National Land Use Policy and National Integrated Planning Framework for Land Resource Development

The National Spatial Strategy

Foundation Geospatial Information to serve National and Global Priorities

September 12, 2014 SENT VIA U.S. MAIL (DELIVERY CONFIRMATION) AND

Unit 1 Test - Version A

NATIONAL ACTION PLAN FOR POLAR BEAR CONSERVATION IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Meeting of the Parties to the Agreement on the Conservation of Polar Bear

Landscape Analysis of Mineral Resources A View from Home Tree ( Avatar )

Marine Spatial Planning: A Tool for Implementing Ecosystem-Based Management

A Regional Database Tracking Fire Footprint Each Year within the South Atlantic Region: Current Database Description and Future Directions

Getting Biodiversity Data

TESTING FUNCTIONAL RESTORATION OF LINEAR FEATURES PHASE I PROGRESS REPORT WITHIN BOREAL CARIBOU RANGE

GIS Data, Technology, and Models. to Integrate Information and Improve Transportation Decision-Making. within the Eco-Logical* Framework for Oregon

Summary: This paper updates the Sub-committee on current thinking regarding the proposal for a Cotswolds Geopark

Terms of Reference for the Comparative Environmental Review (CER) of. Options for the Mactaquac Project, Mactaquac, New Brunswick

Puakea, Hawaiÿi. Puakea, Hawaiÿi WATERSHED FEATURES

Framework for the Basin-Wide Socio-Economic Analysis of Four Proposed Sediment Diversions. August 4, 2015

Missouri River Basin Water Management

PAD-US (CBI Edition) Version 2: Standards and Procedures

Overview of Methods. Terrestrial areas that are most important for conservation Conservation

Keanahalululu Gulch, Hawaiÿi

Advancing Geoscientific Capability. Geological Survey of Finland

INTERNATIONAL CULTURAL TOURISM CHARTER Managing Tourism at Places of Heritage Significance (1999)

Nebraska Conservation and Environmental Review Tool (CERT): Terminology used in the Tables of the CERT Report

CRRT Meeting St. Thomas, USVI June 15-16, 2016

Aboriginal communities strengthen governance with location-based tools in the 21st century

British Columbia Grizzly Bear (Ursus arctos) Population Estimate 2004

Lower South Fork McKenzie River Floodplain Enhancement Project

COURSES OUTSIDE THE JOURNALISM SCHOOL

Data Dictionary for Observation Data Transcription Reports from the Colorado Natural Heritage Program

Population Trends Along the Coastal United States:

Strand 1: Principles of Constitutional Democracy. Strand 2: Principles and Processes of Governance Systems

Environmental Analysis, Chapter 4 Consequences, and Mitigation

Stevns Klint SITE INFORMATION. IUCN Conservation Outlook Assessment 2014 (archived) Finalised on 27 October 2014

Mitigating the human-elephant conflict in Sri Lanka: lessons from Southern Africa

wildlife spatial analysis lab PEOPLE & PLACE: Dasymetric Mapping Using Arc/Info

Geodiversity, Geoheritage & Geoconservation

Defining the Wildland-Urban Interface A Logic-Graphical Interpretation of Population Density

GRIZZLY AND BLACK BEARS

Answers to British Columbia Quizzes

DOWNLOAD OR READ : THE GREAT BASIN A NATURAL PREHISTORY PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

WELCOME & INTRODUCTION

Grant Opportunity Monitoring Bi-State Sage-grouse Populations in Nevada

Welcome to the NRC. Nuclear Energy Tribal Working Group 10/13/2016

Landscape Planning and Habitat Metrics

VR COMMENCES 2018 SURFACE EXPLORATION AT JUNCTION; GRAVITY ANOMALY CONFIRMS THE DOWN-DIP POTENTIAL OF COPPER-SILVER VEINS

Minnesota K-12 Academic Standards in Social Studies. Grade 4: Geography of North America

Bryan F.J. Manly and Andrew Merrill Western EcoSystems Technology Inc. Laramie and Cheyenne, Wyoming. Contents. 1. Introduction...

EAGLES NEST AND PIASA ISLANDS

Internet GIS Sites. 2 OakMapper webgis Application

URANIUM RESEARCH ON NATIVE LANDS

Biodiversity and Protected Areas Management Project

NATURAL HAZARDS MODULE

DFO Maritimes Region Update. Gulf of Maine Council - Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning (CMSP) Committee Web-Ex May 16, 2017

Spatial Decision-Support for National Marine Conservation Areas in the Southern Strait of Georgia and Gwaii Haanas

Transcription:

Grizzly Bear Restoration Plan/ Environmental Impact Statement Steve Rochetta Background Situated in the core of the North Cascades ecosystem (NCE), the North Cascades National Park Complex is surrounded by more than 2.6 million contiguous acres of federally designated wilderness, including protected lands and de facto wilderness in British Columbia,. The NCE constitutes a large block of contiguous habitat that spans the international border but is isolated from grizzly bear populations in other parts of the United States and. Grizzly bears have coexisted with people in the North Cascades ecosystem from when the first people arrived in North America. This changed during the 19th century with the boom in the fur trade. Nearly 3,800 grizzly bear hides were shipped out of area forts during one 25-year period. However, it is unknown how many more grizzly bears were killed by miners and others living and working on the land. As significant mining activity decreased, areas of grizzly bear habitat remained and in many instances returned to a wilder state. What did not survive was a grizzly bear population capable of returning to its former numbers. Research indicates this wilderness landscape is capable of supporting a self-sustaining grizzly bear population. However, there has only been one observation of a solitary bear during the past 10 years. Given the low number of grizzly bears, very slow reproductive rate and other recovery constraints, the NCE grizzly bear population is the most at-risk grizzly bear population in the United States today. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) recently reaffirmed (78 Fed. Reg. 70104 [Nov. 22, 2013]) that the NCE grizzly bear warrants uplisting from Threatened to Endangered under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The main threat to grizzly bears in this recovery zone is a small population size, with resulting demographic and genetic risks. Natural recovery in the NCE is challenged by the absence of verified reproduction and isolation from any contiguous populations in and the United States. In accordance with the NCE Recovery Plan chapter, the National Park Service and the USFWS are initiating a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) planning process as joint lead agencies for grizzly bear restoration in the United States portion of the NCE. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and the United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service will serve as cooperating agencies.

Vancouver BC-99 Washington Bellingham Winthrop Omak I-5 Seattle Wenatchee Cle Elum I-90 Legend Cities Land Ownership Major Interstates and Highways Tribal North Cascades Ecosystem US Bureau of Land Management Water US Fish and Wildlife Service Protected Areas (British Columbia) US Forest Service US National Park Service Miles State Lands 0 10 20 30 Washington Oregon Idaho

Grizzly Bear Restoration Plan/ Environmental Impact Statement Grizzly Bears in the United States Grizzly bears (Ursus arctos horribilis) once existed throughout western North America and into northern Mexico (Servheen 1990). The Lewis and Clark Expedition encountered their first grizzly bears not long after departing from St. Louis, Missouri in 1805 (Schullery 2002). During the 19th century an estimated population of 50,000 was reduced to possibly fewer than 1,000 grizzly bears in just a few decades. Today only 5 isolated populations survive in the contiguous United States (USFWS 1982/1993). Because of the continuing decline in population, the grizzly bear was listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act on July 28, 1975. Direct killing, habitat destruction, habitat modification, and range curtailment were identified by the USFWS as major contributing factors that led to the population decline. (US Fish and Wildlife Service 1982/1993). In the United States, the remaining populations are managed within five recovery zones: NCE, Bitterroot Ecosystem (BE), Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem (NCDE), Selkirk/ Cabinet-Yaak Ecosystem (S/CYE) and the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE). The Interagency Grizzly Bear Committee (IGBC) was formed in 1983 to help ensure the recovery of viable grizzly bear populations in the contiguous states through interagency coordination of policy, planning, management and research. The IGBC consists of representatives from the National Park Service, US Forest Service, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Land Management, the US Geological Survey and representatives of the state wildlife agencies of Washington, Idaho, Wyoming and Montana. A nationwide Grizzly Bear Recovery Plan was finalized by the USFWS in 1982 and updated in 1993. Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and/ or protect the species. (IGBC 1982/1993). In 1997 a chapter specific to the NCE was added to the national plan. The priority actions recommended in the NCE chapter were to: develop a strategy for implementing the recovery chapter (through improved sanitation and access management); develop an ongoing educational program to provide information about grizzly bears and grizzly bear recovery to the public; conduct a research and monitoring effort to determine grizzly bear population size and distribution, habitat and home ranges; and initiate an EIS to evaluate a range of alternatives for how to recover the population in the NCE. Current recovery efforts in the United States are focused on limiting human-caused mortality through conflict reduction and access management; habitat protection; on-going research; and education. At the state and federal level, food storage and waste disposal facilities, along with comprehensive education programs have reduced the most common sources of bear-human conflict.

What is the Purpose The purpose of this Plan/EIS is to determine how to restore the grizzly bear to the North Cascades ecosystem (NCE), a portion of its historic range. What is the Need Since the NCE grizzly bears are at risk of local extinction, action is needed at this time to: Avoid the permanent loss of grizzly bears in the NCE Contribute to the restoration of biodiversity of the ecosystem for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations Enhance the probability of long-term survival and conservation of grizzly bears within the lower 48 States and thereby contribute to overall grizzly bear recovery Support the removal of the grizzly bear from the Federal List of Threatened and Endangered Wildlife Species Matthew Rochetta Timeline Objectives The objectives of this Plan/EIS are to: Restore a grizzly bear population as part of the natural and cultural heritage of the North Cascades. Provide Pacific Northwest residents and visitors with the opportunity to again experience grizzly bears in their native habitat Seek to support Tribal cultural and spiritual values, as well as environmental and natural resource objectives related to the grizzly bear Expand outreach efforts to inform and involve the public, and build understanding about grizzly bear recovery The Planning Process As part of the planning process, various approaches for the restoration of a grizzly bear population to the NCE will be evaluated. Preliminary alternatives to be considered in the Plan/EIS include the no action alternative (status quo), as well as active restoration alternatives including moving grizzly bears from other United States and/or Canadian populations into the NCE as either a threatened or experimental population under the ESA. The Plan/EIS will evaluate the effects of a range of alternatives including potential impacts to: rare or unusual vegetation, wildlife and habitat, soundscapes, wilderness, visitor use and experience, socioeconomics, human safety, and other resources. 1975 1980 1982 1983 1991 1991 1993 1997 2004 2014 Grizzly bear listed as threatened species, lower 48 states under Endangered Species Act. Grizzly bear listed as an endangered species by State of Washington. National Grizzly Bear Recovery Plan approved by USFWS; revised in 1993. Interagency Grizzly Bear Committee established. 9,800 square miles of North Cascades ecosystem in Washington State identified as adequate habitat for grizzly bears. Grizzly bears are confirmed in locations from just north of Interstate 90 to the international border. The decision was made by the Interagency Grizzly Bear Committee during their winter 1991 meeting to recover grizzly bears in the North Cascades. Detailed habitat evaluation of the North Cascades ecosystem published. North Cascades chapter added to National Grizzly Bear Recovery Plan. A grizzly bear recovery plan was completed for the British Columbia portion of North Cascades ecosystem. NPS/USFWS begin Environmental Impact Statement on grizzly bear restoration in the North Cascades ecosystem.

What happens during the EIS process? The EIS process is completed in the following ordered steps: Notice of Intent (NOI), draft EIS, final EIS, and record of decision (ROD). The Notice of Intent is published in the Federal Register by the lead federal agency and signals the initiation of the process. Scoping, an open process involving the public and other federal, state, tribal, and local agencies, commences immediately to identify the major and important issues for consideration during the process. Public involvement and agency coordination continues throughout the entire process. The draft EIS provides a detailed description of the proposal, the purpose and need, reasonable alternatives, the affected environment, and presents analysis of the anticipated beneficial and adverse environmental effects of the alternatives. The preferred alternative will be identified in the Draft EIS, if one exists at the time it is released to the public. If it is not identified in the draft EIS, the preferred alternative will be identified in the Final EIS. Following the formal comment period and analysis of comments received from the public and other agencies, the final EIS will be developed and issued. The final EIS will incorporate changes to the alternatives or analysis based on the public comments received and include responses to the comments. No sooner than 30 days after the final EIS is released to the public, a record of decision will be signed by the lead agency (or in this case joint lead agencies) identifying the selected action. Implementation of the selected action can begin immediately after the record of decision is signed. Sue Senger Winter 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Fall 2017 Public Scoping Draft Plan/EIS Release and Public Comment Final Plan/EIS Release NPS/USFWS Record of Decision References U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2011. Grizzly Bear (Ursus arctos horribilis): 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Grizzly Bear Recovery Office, Missoula Montana. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1982/1993. Grizzly Bear Recovery Plan. Missoula, Montana. 181 pp. Located at: http://www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/species/mammals/grizzly/grizzly_ bear_recovery_plan.pdf. Roger Christophersen