Economics 345: Applied Econometrics Section A01 University of Victoria Midterm Examination #2 Version 1 SOLUTIONS Fall 2016 Instructor: Martin Farnham

Similar documents
Economics 345: Applied Econometrics Section A01 University of Victoria Midterm Examination #2 Version 2 Fall 2016 Instructor: Martin Farnham

Unless provided with information to the contrary, assume for each question below that the Classical Linear Model assumptions hold.

Brief Suggested Solutions

ECON3150/4150 Spring 2016

Multiple Regression Analysis: Inference MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS: INFERENCE. Sampling Distributions of OLS Estimators

CHAPTER 6: SPECIFICATION VARIABLES

Multiple Regression Analysis

coefficients n 2 are the residuals obtained when we estimate the regression on y equals the (simple regression) estimated effect of the part of x 1

Problem Set # 1. Master in Business and Quantitative Methods

2. (3.5) (iii) Simply drop one of the independent variables, say leisure: GP A = β 0 + β 1 study + β 2 sleep + β 3 work + u.

Econometrics Review questions for exam

Lectures 5 & 6: Hypothesis Testing

Multiple Regression Analysis

Econometrics I KS. Module 2: Multivariate Linear Regression. Alexander Ahammer. This version: April 16, 2018

Multiple Linear Regression CIVL 7012/8012

Multiple Regression: Inference

Statistical Inference. Part IV. Statistical Inference

Statistical Inference with Regression Analysis

2) For a normal distribution, the skewness and kurtosis measures are as follows: A) 1.96 and 4 B) 1 and 2 C) 0 and 3 D) 0 and 0

Multiple Regression Analysis. Part III. Multiple Regression Analysis

1 Correlation between an independent variable and the error

Problem Set #3-Key. wage Coef. Std. Err. t P> t [95% Conf. Interval]

Econometrics. Week 8. Fall Institute of Economic Studies Faculty of Social Sciences Charles University in Prague

An explanation of Two Stage Least Squares

Final Exam - Solutions

The general linear regression with k explanatory variables is just an extension of the simple regression as follows

M(t) = 1 t. (1 t), 6 M (0) = 20 P (95. X i 110) i=1

1. You have data on years of work experience, EXPER, its square, EXPER2, years of education, EDUC, and the log of hourly wages, LWAGE

Quantitative Methods Final Exam (2017/1)

WISE MA/PhD Programs Econometrics Instructor: Brett Graham Spring Semester, Academic Year Exam Version: A

An overview of applied econometrics

Problem Set #6: OLS. Economics 835: Econometrics. Fall 2012

Warwick Economics Summer School Topics in Microeconometrics Instrumental Variables Estimation

Introduction to Regression Analysis. Dr. Devlina Chatterjee 11 th August, 2017

Inference in Regression Model

CHAPTER 4. > 0, where β

WISE MA/PhD Programs Econometrics Instructor: Brett Graham Spring Semester, Academic Year Exam Version: A

FINANCIAL ECONOMETRICS AND EMPIRICAL FINANCE -MODULE2 Midterm Exam Solutions - March 2015

Multiple Regression. Midterm results: AVG = 26.5 (88%) A = 27+ B = C =

EC212: Introduction to Econometrics Review Materials (Wooldridge, Appendix)

UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID ECONOMETRICS Academic year 2009/10 FINAL EXAM (2nd Call) June, 25, 2010

Practice Questions for the Final Exam. Theoretical Part

Estimating the return to education for married women mroz.csv: 753 observations and 22 variables

UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID ECONOMETRICS FINAL EXAM (Type B) 2. This document is self contained. Your are not allowed to use any other material.

Econometrics - 30C00200

ECO375 Tutorial 4 Wooldridge: Chapter 6 and 7

Regression with a Single Regressor: Hypothesis Tests and Confidence Intervals

Exercise Sheet 4 Instrumental Variables and Two Stage Least Squares Estimation

Rockefeller College University at Albany

QUEEN S UNIVERSITY FINAL EXAMINATION FACULTY OF ARTS AND SCIENCE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS APRIL 2018

STAT 285: Fall Semester Final Examination Solutions

ECO375 Tutorial 8 Instrumental Variables

ECNS 561 Multiple Regression Analysis

Economics 113. Simple Regression Assumptions. Simple Regression Derivation. Changing Units of Measurement. Nonlinear effects

2 Prediction and Analysis of Variance

statistical sense, from the distributions of the xs. The model may now be generalized to the case of k regressors:

WISE International Masters

Practice Problems Section Problems

Econometrics Homework 1

Notes 6: Multivariate regression ECO 231W - Undergraduate Econometrics

Multiple Linear Regression

5. Let W follow a normal distribution with mean of μ and the variance of 1. Then, the pdf of W is

Inference in Regression Analysis

Introduction to Econometrics. Heteroskedasticity

Applied Quantitative Methods II

The Simple Linear Regression Model

OSU Economics 444: Elementary Econometrics. Ch.10 Heteroskedasticity

Midterm 1 ECO Undergraduate Econometrics

Econ 1123: Section 2. Review. Binary Regressors. Bivariate. Regression. Omitted Variable Bias

Chapter 1. An Overview of Regression Analysis. Econometrics and Quantitative Analysis. What is Econometrics? (cont.) What is Econometrics?

LECTURE 5. Introduction to Econometrics. Hypothesis testing

Lecture 30. DATA 8 Summer Regression Inference

Second Midterm Exam Economics 410 Thurs., April 2, 2009

ECON 497 Midterm Spring

Economics 241B Estimation with Instruments

Basic Linear Model. Chapters 4 and 4: Part II. Basic Linear Model

Wooldridge, Introductory Econometrics, 4th ed. Chapter 15: Instrumental variables and two stage least squares

Introductory Econometrics. Review of statistics (Part II: Inference)

Questions and Answers on Unit Roots, Cointegration, VARs and VECMs

Introductory Econometrics

ECO220Y Simple Regression: Testing the Slope

ECONOMICS AND ECONOMIC METHODS PRELIM EXAM Statistics and Econometrics August 2013

LECTURE 6. Introduction to Econometrics. Hypothesis testing & Goodness of fit

ECON3150/4150 Spring 2015

Econometrics. Week 4. Fall Institute of Economic Studies Faculty of Social Sciences Charles University in Prague

Recitation 1: Regression Review. Christina Patterson

Statistics 433 Practice Final Exam: Cover Sheet and Marking Sheet

1 Motivation for Instrumental Variable (IV) Regression

STA441: Spring Multiple Regression. This slide show is a free open source document. See the last slide for copyright information.

ECON 4160, Autumn term Lecture 1

F Tests and F statistics

9. Linear Regression and Correlation

ECON3150/4150 Spring 2016

Stat 135, Fall 2006 A. Adhikari HOMEWORK 10 SOLUTIONS

Econometrics -- Final Exam (Sample)

Homoskedasticity. Var (u X) = σ 2. (23)

Assessing Studies Based on Multiple Regression

Sampling Distributions: Central Limit Theorem

Testing Linear Restrictions: cont.

ECONOMET RICS P RELIM EXAM August 24, 2010 Department of Economics, Michigan State University

Transcription:

Economics 345: Applied Econometrics Section A01 University of Victoria Midterm Examination #2 Version 1 SOLUTIONS Fall 2016 Instructor: Martin Farnham Last name (family name): First name (given name): Student ID Number: Midterm Exam #2 Version 1 Unless provided with information to the contrary, assume for each question below that the Classical Linear Model assumptions hold. Section 1: Multiple Choice (3 points each) Select the most appropriate answer, and carefully bubble in the letter of the answer on your NCS marking card. Questions 1-3 refer to the following setup: Suppose you obtain the following fitted model: bwght = ˆβ0 + ˆβ 1 cigs + ˆβ 2 faminc, where bwght is child birth weight in ounces, cigs is the average daily number of cigarettes smoked per day by the mother during pregnancy, and faminc is family income measured in dollars. 1) is an estimate of! ˆβ 2 A) how many dollars of income it takes to increase birth weight by 1 ounce, on average B) how many ounces an extra dollar of income raises birth weight, on average. C) how many ounces the average baby weighs, when cigs=0. D) how many ounces the average baby weighs, when cigs is at its average value. E) none of the above. 1

2) If you re-estimate this model with cigs measured in packs (there are 20 cigarettes in a pack), how will the coefficient estimates change? A) The new coefficient estimates will be the same as the old estimates. B) The new coefficient estimates will be the old estimates divided by 20. C) The new coefficient estimates will be the old estimates multiplied by 20. D) Only ˆβ 0 will change. E) ˆβ 1 will be 20 times as large as in the original specification. 3) Suppose the true population model of y is given by y = β 0 + β 2 + β 3 x 3 + u. Which of the following will lead to a higher variance of the OLS estimator, ˆβ 3? A) A larger sample size. B) Less variation in x3. C) Less variation in u. D) Lower correlation between x1 and x3. E) All of the above will lead to a higher variance of the OLS estimator, ˆβ 3. 4) Which of the following is/are consequences of overspecifying a model (including irrelevant variables on the right-hand-side)? I. The variance of the estimators may increase. II. The variance of the estimators may stay the same. III. Bias of the estimators may increase. A) I only. D) I and II only. E) I, II, and III. Questions 5-6 share the following setup: Suppose the true population model of y is given by (1) y = β 0 + β 2 + u, but you estimate the following model instead: (2) y = γ 0 +γ 2 + v. [The gammas ( γ ) are just constant parameters like the betas ( β )] 2

5) Suppose x1 and x2 are uncorrelated, and β 1 0. Which of the following statements is/are DEFINITELY true? I. ˆγ 2 will be biased. II. Var( ˆγ 2 )<Var( ˆβ2 ) III. The error variance of model (1) will be less than that of model (2). A) I only. D) I and III only. E) I, II, and III. 6) Suppose x1 and x2 are negatively correlated, and! β 1 > 0. Which of the following statements is/are DEFINITELY true? I. ˆγ 2 will be biased. II. Var( ˆγ 2 )<Var( ˆβ2 ) III. E[ ˆγ 2 ]>E[ ˆβ2 ]. A) I only. D) I and III only. E) I, II, and III. 7) Assume that the five Gauss Markov assumptions hold. Which of the following is an advantage of a very large sample size for OLS estimation and inference? I. Coefficient estimates will tend to be very precise. II. Coefficient estimates will approach having a normal distribution. III. Inconsistent estimators will approach the true parameter value as n goes to infiniti. A) I only. D) I and II only. E) I, II and III. 3

8) Suppose the true model of y is given by y = β 0 + β 2 + u. Then, if you estimate the following mis-specified model, y = β 0 + v, and if corr(x1,x2)<0 and β2<0, which of the following statements is TRUE? A) ˆβ 1 will be negatively biased. B) ˆβ 1 will have positive inconsistency. C) ˆβ 1 will be unbiased. D) ˆβ 1 will be consistent. E) ˆβ 1 will be efficient. 9) Suppose you estimate the following model of child birthweight as a function of cigarette use and family characteristics: bwght = β 0 cigs + β 2 parity + β 3 faminc + β 4 motheduc + β 5 fatheduc + u, using a sample size of n=2006. Suppose that the R-squared for this model is 0.40. When motheduc and fatheduc are dropped from the right-hand-side and the model is re-estimated, the R-squared falls to 0.39. What is the F-statistic for the null hypothesis that the coefficients on motheduc and fatheduc are jointly equal to zero? Answers below are rounded to the nearest whole number. A) 1 B) 2 C) 3 D) 17 E) 25 10) Suppose you estimate the following model in EViews: y = β 0 + β 2 + β 3 x 3 + u. You want to test the following null hypothesis: H0: β 3 = 0 against H1: β 3 < 0. Along with an estimate of ˆ β 3, where the estimate is greater than 0, EViews gives you a p value of 0.04. Consider the following statements: I. You fail to reject the null hypothesis at the 10% level. II. You can reject the null hypothesis at the 6% level. III. You can reject the null hypothesis at the 3% level. Which combination of statements is true? 4

A) I only. D) I and II only. E) II and III only. END SECTION 1. Section 2: Short Answers Answer the question as clearly and concisely as possible on the exam paper. Note that while this question has multiple parts, most parts can be answered without knowing the answers to other parts. So if you can t do one part, move on to a later part you can do. 1) 20 points total Suppose you estimate the following model by OLS: wage = β 0 educ + β 2 exper +u wage: hourly wage in dollars educ: years of education exper: years of experience You obtain the following fitted model using EViews, where the standard errors of coefficient estimates are given in parentheses below each estimate:! wage = 3.5+0.9educ +1.5exper (2.0) (0.7) (0.5) Number of Observations: 523 R-squared: 0.45 5

a) (6 points) At the 1% level, conduct a test of the hypothesis that β 2 = 0 against the alternative that β 2 > 0. Formally write out the null hypothesis; show how you calculate the appropriate test statistic; and make careful note of the degrees of freedom, the critical value of your test statistic, and whether or not you reject the null. H 0 :β 2 = 0 H 1 :β 2 > 0 df=n-k-1=520 ˆt = null ( ˆβ 2 β 2 ) se( ˆβ 2 ) = ˆβ 2 se( ˆβ 2 ) = 1.5.5 = 3 t crit = 2.326 This is a one-sided test, because we have a one-sided (positive) alternative. So the rejection region lies to the right of 2.326. Therefore the t-statistic lies in the rejection region (because 3>2.326). So we reject the null hypothesis in favour of the alternative. b) (3 points) Draw a picture of the distribution of the test statistic used in (a), assuming the null hypothesis is true. Your clearly labeled drawing should denote the rejection region(s) and the value of the test statistic you obtained in (a). (see separate posted drawings; to follow with a delay) Note that we always assume the null hypothesis is true when we do hypothesis testing. The entire approach is based on the initial assumption that the null is true with rejection of the null occurring only if we get a realization of the t-statistic that is an extreme value (i.e., that lies in the rejection region). When we draw the t-distribution, we re drawing the t-distribution under the null which is the same as assuming the null hypothesis is true. This wording seemed to throw some people, but it is always done with that wording implicit at least. 6

Note that failure to understand that numbers increase in value as we move from left to right along an x-axis (and from down to up along a y-axis) constitutes a serious misunderstanding that you should remedy before the final exam. No student should have got to this point at UVic without realizing this basic convention, and yet about 5% of students in the course made this mistake on the exam. Ask me if you have questions. c) (2 points) What does your finding in (a) prove (if anything)? We re testing at the 1% significance level. The fact that we reject the null holds out two possibilities. Either 1) We got an unlucky draw and accidentally rejected the null when it s really true. This should happen 1% of the time in repeated samples. or 2) The null is false, and our t-test has led us to correctly reject the null in favour of the alternative. Since case 1 should only occur 1% of the time, we will interpret our finding as strong evidence that experience is a positive determinant of the wage. Technically, this doesn t absolutely prove anything, but (assuming the Gauss-Markov assumptions hold) most people would interpret this as strong evidence that more experience causes wage increases. d) (6 points) Now, at the 5% level, conduct a test of the null hypothesis that experience and education jointly have no effect on the wage, against the alternative that this is not true. Formally state the null and alternative hypothesis. Show how you calculate the appropriate test statistic, and make careful note of the degrees of freedom, the critical value of your test statistic, and whether or not you reject the null. 7

Anytime you see a call for a test of joint significance (at least in this course) you should be thinking F-test. You can t test for joint significance with a t-test, because a t-test will only accommodate a single-equation null hypothesis. H 0 :β 1 = 0, β 2 = 0 H 1 : Null is false Here is the unrestricted equation: wage = β 0 educ + β 2 exper +u The R-squared for the unrestricted equation is 0.45. Here is the restricted equation (the equation that holds under the null): wage = β 0 +u The R-squared for the unrestricted equation is 0, because it has no explanatory variables. To conduct the F-test first construct the F-statistic: R 2 2 ( ur R r )/2 F = 2 ( 1 R ur )/ n k 1 ( ) = 0.45 0 ( )/2 0.55/520 212.7 numerator degrees of freedom: 2 denominator degrees of freedom: n-k-1=520 The F-critical value: 3 Since F=212.7>Fcrit=3, we reject the null hypothesis. e) (3 points) Draw a picture of the distribution of the test statistic used in (d), assuming the null hypothesis is true. Your clearly labeled drawing should denote the rejection region(s) and the value of the test statistic you obtained in (d). (see separate posted drawings; to follow with a delay) 8

END SECTION 2. END OF EXAM. This Page Intentionally Left Blank (for scratch work) 9