Measures on spaces of Riemannian metrics CMS meeting December 6, 2015

Similar documents
RANDOM FIELDS AND GEOMETRY. Robert Adler and Jonathan Taylor

Invariance Theory, the Heat Equation, and the Atiyah-Singer Index Theorem

Holonomy groups. Thomas Leistner. Mathematics Colloquium School of Mathematics and Physics The University of Queensland. October 31, 2011 May 28, 2012

MILNOR SEMINAR: DIFFERENTIAL FORMS AND CHERN CLASSES

1. Geometry of the unit tangent bundle

Fractional Index Theory

Infinitesimal Einstein Deformations. Kähler Manifolds

An observation concerning uniquely ergodic vector fields on 3-manifolds. Clifford Henry Taubes

THE GAUSS-BONNET THEOREM FOR VECTOR BUNDLES

NONNEGATIVE CURVATURE AND COBORDISM TYPE. 1. Introduction

Quantum ergodicity. Nalini Anantharaman. 22 août Université de Strasbourg

Notes by Maksim Maydanskiy.

On the BCOV Conjecture

L 2 Geometry of the Symplectomorphism Group

Exercises in Geometry II University of Bonn, Summer semester 2015 Professor: Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1

Radial balanced metrics on the unit disk

ON THE FOLIATION OF SPACE-TIME BY CONSTANT MEAN CURVATURE HYPERSURFACES

From holonomy reductions of Cartan geometries to geometric compactifications

CENTROAFFINE HYPEROVALOIDS WITH EINSTEIN METRIC

UNIVERSITY OF DUBLIN

Multiplicity of singularities is not a bi-lipschitz invariant

Nodal Sets of High-Energy Arithmetic Random Waves

Index theory on manifolds with corners: Generalized Gauss-Bonnet formulas

Poisson Equation on Closed Manifolds

LECTURE 10: THE PARALLEL TRANSPORT

The Geometrization Theorem

1 Smooth manifolds and Lie groups

RICCI SOLITONS ON COMPACT KAHLER SURFACES. Thomas Ivey

Self-intersections of Closed Parametrized Minimal Surfaces in Generic Riemannian Manifolds

Pseudo-Poincaré Inequalities and Applications to Sobolev Inequalities

Pseudogroups of foliations Algebraic invariants of solenoids The discriminant group Stable actions Wild actions Future work and references

Parallel and Killing Spinors on Spin c Manifolds. 1 Introduction. Andrei Moroianu 1

Critical metrics on connected sums of Einstein four-manifolds

Holonomy groups. Thomas Leistner. School of Mathematical Sciences Colloquium University of Adelaide, May 7, /15

Let F be a foliation of dimension p and codimension q on a smooth manifold of dimension n.

Two simple ideas from calculus applied to Riemannian geometry

Einstein-Hilbert action on Connes-Landi noncommutative manifolds

Arithmetic quantum chaos and random wave conjecture. 9th Mathematical Physics Meeting. Goran Djankovi

Constructing the 2d Liouville Model

Geometry and the Kato square root problem

LECTURE 15: COMPLETENESS AND CONVEXITY

INSTANTON MODULI AND COMPACTIFICATION MATTHEW MAHOWALD

A surgery formula for the smooth Yamabe invariant

MATH DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY. Contents

Abstract. Jacobi curves are far going generalizations of the spaces of \Jacobi

Isometries of Riemannian and sub-riemannian structures on 3D Lie groups

Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of the Laplacian. Andrew Hassell

Stein s method, logarithmic Sobolev and transport inequalities

YAIZA CANZANI AND BORIS HANIN

CMS winter meeting 2008, Ottawa. The heat kernel on connected sums

Geometry of the Calabi-Yau Moduli

Liouville Quantum Gravity on the Riemann sphere

ON THE REGULARITY OF SAMPLE PATHS OF SUB-ELLIPTIC DIFFUSIONS ON MANIFOLDS

Donaldson and Seiberg-Witten theory and their relation to N = 2 SYM

Geometry and the Kato square root problem

NEW LIFTS OF SASAKI TYPE OF THE RIEMANNIAN METRICS

Stable minimal cones in R 8 and R 9 with constant scalar curvature

Reduction of Homogeneous Riemannian structures

TWISTOR AND KILLING FORMS IN RIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY

Hamiltonian Systems of Negative Curvature are Hyperbolic

An introduction to arithmetic groups. Lizhen Ji CMS, Zhejiang University Hangzhou , China & Dept of Math, Univ of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109

ARITHMETICITY OF TOTALLY GEODESIC LIE FOLIATIONS WITH LOCALLY SYMMETRIC LEAVES

η = (e 1 (e 2 φ)) # = e 3

TWISTORS AND THE OCTONIONS Penrose 80. Nigel Hitchin. Oxford July 21st 2011

A SHARP STABILITY ESTIMATE IN TENSOR TOMOGRAPHY

Partial Density Functions and Hele-Shaw Flow

ON FRACTAL DIMENSION OF INVARIANT SETS

Hyperkähler geometry lecture 3

Invariant Nonholonomic Riemannian Structures on Three-Dimensional Lie Groups

Analysis in weighted spaces : preliminary version

Differential Geometry Exercises

Integration of non linear conservation laws?

CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS. 1. Riemannian manifolds Recall that for any smooth manifold M, dim M = n, the union T M =

CHAPTER 3. Gauss map. In this chapter we will study the Gauss map of surfaces in R 3.

As always, the story begins with Riemann surfaces or just (real) surfaces. (As we have already noted, these are nearly the same thing).

Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 41(4)

The Cheeger-Müller theorem and generalizations

We have the following immediate corollary. 1

Distances, volumes, and integration

Hyperbolic Geometry on Geometric Surfaces

A brief introduction to Semi-Riemannian geometry and general relativity. Hans Ringström

ICM 2014: The Structure and Meaning. of Ricci Curvature. Aaron Naber ICM 2014: Aaron Naber

A SHORT OVERVIEW OF SPIN REPRESENTATIONS. Contents

Rough metrics, the Kato square root problem, and the continuity of a flow tangent to the Ricci flow

Cohomology of the Mumford Quotient

Lecture 8. Connections

SPECTRAL ASYMMETRY AND RIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY

AN ALMOST KÄHLER STRUCTURE ON THE DEFORMATION SPACE OF CONVEX REAL PROJECTIVE STRUCTURES

A Bird Eye s view: recent update to Extremal metrics

Wave equation on manifolds and finite speed of propagation

Exercise 1 (Formula for connection 1-forms) Using the first structure equation, show that

INTRO TO SUBRIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY

WHAT IS Q-CURVATURE?

Introduction to Index Theory. Elmar Schrohe Institut für Analysis

Open Questions in Quantum Information Geometry

Euler Characteristic of Two-Dimensional Manifolds

Min-max methods in Geometry. André Neves

Gaussian Fields and Percolation

Lecture 3 - Lie Groups and Geometry

class # MATH 7711, AUTUMN 2017 M-W-F 3:00 p.m., BE 128 A DAY-BY-DAY LIST OF TOPICS

Transcription:

Measures on spaces of Riemannian metrics CMS meeting December 6, 2015 D. Jakobson (McGill), jakobson@math.mcgill.ca [CJW]: Y. Canzani, I. Wigman, DJ: arxiv:1002.0030, Jour. of Geometric Analysis, 2013 [CCKJST]: B. Clarke, N. Kamran, L. Silberman, J. Taylor, Y. Canzani, DJ: arxiv:1309.1348, Ann. Math. du Québec, 2015 December 6, 2015

Conjectures in Quantum Chaos: Random Wave conjecture, GOE level spacing conjecture, conjectures about nodal sets etc. Integration on manifolds of metrics: D. Ebin defined L 2 metric on manifolds of metrics. Restricted to the space of hyperbolic metrics on a compact surface, we get Weil-Petersson metric on moduli spaces of hyperbolic metrics (singular manifolds!). Many people studied differentiation on manifolds of metrics; such notions as Levi-Civita connection, geodesics, parallel transport etc. have been defined. Want to define integration. Our spaces of metrics are infinite-dimensional, so it is convenient to define Gaussian measures on those spaces.

Fix a compact smooth Riemannian manifold M n. We shall discuss several measures on manifolds of metrics on M. Measures on conformal classes of metrics: concentrated near a reference metric g 0, supported on regular (e.g. Sobolev, real-analytic) metrics a.s. Applications to the study of Gauss curvature. Measures on manifolds of metrics with the fixed volume form, applications to the study of L 2 (Ebin) distance function, and to integrability of the diameter, eigenvalue and volume entropy functionals. Remark: All measures are invariant by the action of diffeomorphisms.

Conformal class: g 0 - reference metric on M. Conformal class of g 0 : {g 1 = e f g 0 }; f is a random (suitably regular) function on M. 0 - Laplacian of g 0. Spectrum: 0 φ j + λ j φ j = 0, 0 = λ 0 < λ 1 λ 2.... Define f by f (x) = a j c j φ j (x), a j N (0, 1) are i.i.d standard Gaussians, c j = F(λ j ) 0 (damping): j=1

The covariance function r f (x, y) := E[f (x)f (y)] = j=1 c 2 j φ j (x)φ j (y), for x, y M. For x M, f (x) is mean zero Gaussian of variance r f (x, x) = cj 2 φ j (x) 2. j=1 Examples: Random Sobolev metric: c j = λ s j, = r f (x, y) = j φ j (x)φ j (y), spectral zeta function. λ 2s j Random real-analytic metric c j = e λ j t, = r f (x, y) = j φ j(x)φ j (y)e 2λ j t, heat kernel.

Sobolev regularity: If E f 2 H s = j c 2 j (1 + λ j ) s < then f H s (M) a.s. Weyl s law + Sobolev embedding imply Proposition: If c j = O(λ s j ), s > n/2, then f C 0 a.s; if c j = O(λ s j ), s > n/2 + 1, then f C 2 a.s.

[CJW]: Let n = 2, and let g 0 have non-vanishing Gauss curvature (M T 2 ). Can estimate the probability that after a random conformal perturbation, the Gauss curvature will change sign somewhere on M. Techniques: curvature transformation in 2d under conformal changes of metrics, large deviation estimates (Borell, Tsirelson-Ibragimov-Sudakov, Adler-Taylor). n 3: related results for scalar curvature and Q-curvature.

Random (Sobolev) embeddings into R k : 1-dimensional i.i.d. Gaussians k-dimensional i.i.d. Gaussians. F. Morgan (1979): M = S 1, k = 3: a.s. results about minimal surfaces spanned by random knots. F. Morgan (1982): general compact M, a.s. Whitney embedding theorems + applications. We shall use similar ideas to define Gaussian measures on manifolds of metrics with fixed volume form; transverse to conformal classes.

Random (Sobolev) embeddings into R k : 1-dimensional i.i.d. Gaussians k-dimensional i.i.d. Gaussians. F. Morgan (1979): M = S 1, k = 3: a.s. results about minimal surfaces spanned by random knots. F. Morgan (1982): general compact M, a.s. Whitney embedding theorems + applications. We shall use similar ideas to define Gaussian measures on manifolds of metrics with fixed volume form; transverse to conformal classes.

Random (Sobolev) embeddings into R k : 1-dimensional i.i.d. Gaussians k-dimensional i.i.d. Gaussians. F. Morgan (1979): M = S 1, k = 3: a.s. results about minimal surfaces spanned by random knots. F. Morgan (1982): general compact M, a.s. Whitney embedding theorems + applications. We shall use similar ideas to define Gaussian measures on manifolds of metrics with fixed volume form; transverse to conformal classes.

Random (Sobolev) embeddings into R k : 1-dimensional i.i.d. Gaussians k-dimensional i.i.d. Gaussians. F. Morgan (1979): M = S 1, k = 3: a.s. results about minimal surfaces spanned by random knots. F. Morgan (1982): general compact M, a.s. Whitney embedding theorems + applications. We shall use similar ideas to define Gaussian measures on manifolds of metrics with fixed volume form; transverse to conformal classes.

Metrics = sections of Pos(M) Sym(M) Hom(TM, T M) (positive-definite, symmetric maps); symmetric matrices in local coordinates. GL(T x M) acts on Pos x (M) with stabilizer isomorphic to O(n). Fix a volume form v, consider Met v (M). SL(T x M) acts on the fibre Pos v x(m) by h.g x = h T g x h; stabilizer isomorphic to SO(n). We have Pos v x(m) = SL n (R)/SO n Fix g 0 Met v ; dv(x) = det g 0 (x) dx 1... dx n. Let G x = SL(T x M), K x = SO(g 0 x ).

Metrics = sections of Pos(M) Sym(M) Hom(TM, T M) (positive-definite, symmetric maps); symmetric matrices in local coordinates. GL(T x M) acts on Pos x (M) with stabilizer isomorphic to O(n). Fix a volume form v, consider Met v (M). SL(T x M) acts on the fibre Pos v x(m) by h.g x = h T g x h; stabilizer isomorphic to SO(n). We have Pos v x(m) = SL n (R)/SO n Fix g 0 Met v ; dv(x) = det g 0 (x) dx 1... dx n. Let G x = SL(T x M), K x = SO(g 0 x ).

f x frame in T x M orthonormal w.r.to g 0 x, A x G x positive diagonal matrices of determinant 1 (w.r. to f x ). Every g 1 x Pos v x(m) can be represented as g 1 x = (k x a x )g 0 x, k x K x, a x A x ; unique up to S n acting on f x. Assumption: M is parallelizable ( global section of the frame bundle). Examples: All 3-manifolds; All Lie groups; The frame bundle of any manifold; The sphere S n iff n {1, 3, 7}. Necessary condition: vanishing of the 2nd Stiefel-Whitney class. For orientable spin.

f x frame in T x M orthonormal w.r.to g 0 x, A x G x positive diagonal matrices of determinant 1 (w.r. to f x ). Every g 1 x Pos v x(m) can be represented as g 1 x = (k x a x )g 0 x, k x K x, a x A x ; unique up to S n acting on f x. Assumption: M is parallelizable ( global section of the frame bundle). Examples: All 3-manifolds; All Lie groups; The frame bundle of any manifold; The sphere S n iff n {1, 3, 7}. Necessary condition: vanishing of the 2nd Stiefel-Whitney class. For orientable spin.

M parallelizable. Choose a global section f 0 of the frame bundle orthonormal w.r. to g 0. To define g 1 x, we apply to f 0 a composition of a rotation k x SO(T x M) and a diagonal unimodular transformation a x SL(T x M) which will define an orthonormal basis f 1 x for g 1 x. By construction, g 0 and g 1 will have the same volume form. We let a x = exp(h(x)), where H : M a = R n 1 is the Lie algebra of Diag 0 (n) SL n. Similarly, let k x = exp h(x), where h : M so n, the Lie algebra of SO n. Choice of g 0 + parallelizability makes the above construction well-defined.

We define Gaussian measures on {H : M a} and {h : M so n } as in Morgan. In the sequel, only need H; constructions are analogous.

Let H(x) = π n (A j )β j ψ j (x), (1) j=1 where ψ j + λ j ψ j = 0; A j are i.i.d standard Gaussians in R n ; π n : R n {x R n : x (1,..., 1) = 0} R n 1 - projection into the hyperplane n j=1 x j = 0; β j = F 2 (λ j ) > 0, where F 2 (t) is (eventually) monotone decreasing function of t, F(t) 0 as t.

Smoothness: Morgan showed Proposition 1: If β j = O(j r ) where r > (q + α)/n + 1/2, then H converges a.s. in C q,α (M, R n 1 ). Proposition 1 + Weyl s law = Proposition 2: If β j = O(λ s j ) where s > q/2 + n/4, then H converges a.s. in C q (M, R n 1 ).

Smoothness: Morgan showed Proposition 1: If β j = O(j r ) where r > (q + α)/n + 1/2, then H converges a.s. in C q,α (M, R n 1 ). Proposition 1 + Weyl s law = Proposition 2: If β j = O(λ s j ) where s > q/2 + n/4, then H converges a.s. in C q (M, R n 1 ).

Lipschitz distance ρ: ρ(g 0, g 1 ) = sup x M sup 0 ξ T x M ln g 1(ξ, ξ) g 0 (ξ, ξ) (2) A related expression appeared in the paper by Bando-Urakawa. If g 1 (x) = (k(x)d(x))g 0 (x) then ρ only depends on the diagonal part d(x). Tail estimate for ρ: One can show that for large R, Prob{ρ(g 0, g 1 ) > R} 2 n (n + ɛ) Prob{sup d 1 (x) > R/2} (3) x M

Definition of d 1 : Recall from (1): H(x) = j=1 π n (A j )β j ψ j (x). Define D(x) = (d 1 (x),..., d n (x)) by D(x) = A j β j ψ j (x) j=1 ( don t project A j ). The covariance function for d 1 (x): r d1 (x, y) = βk 2 ψ k(x)ψ k (y), k=1 Define σ 2 by σ 2 := σ(d 1 ) 2 := sup r d1 (x, x). (4) x M

Borell-TIS theorem applied to the random field d 1 implies Proposition 3. Let σ be as in (4). Then ln Prob{ρ(g 0, g 1 ) > R} lim R R 2 1 8σ 2. (5) More precise result: Proposition 4. There exists α > 0 such that for a fixed ɛ > 0 and for large enough R, we have ( ) αr Prob{ρ(g 1, g 0 ) > R} 2 n (n + ɛ) exp 2 R2 8σ 2.

ρ controls diameter and eigenvalues: Proposition 5. Assume that dvol(g 0 ) = dvol(g 1 ) and ρ(g 0, g 1 ) < R. Then e R diam(m, g 1) diam(m, g 0 ) er (6) and e 2R λ k( (g 1 )) λ k ( (g 0 )) e2r. (7)

Propositions 4 and 5 imply Theorem 6. Let h : R + R + be a monotonically increasing function such that for some δ > 0 ( [ ]) h(e y ) = O exp y 2 (1/(8σ 2 ) δ). Then h(diam(g 1 )) is integrable with respect to the probability measure dω(g 1 ) constructed earlier. and Theorem 7. Let h : R + R + be a monotonically increasing function such that for some δ > 0 h(e 2y ) = O ( exp [ y 2 (1/(8σ 2 ) δ) ]). Then h(λ k ( (g 1 ))) is integrable with respect to the probability measure dω(g 1 ) constructed earlier.

Similar results can be established for volume entropy, h vol = lim s ln volb(x, s) s

L 2 or Ebin distance between can be computed as follows [Ebin, Clarke]: Ω 2 2 (g0, g 1 ) := d 2,x (g 0 (x), g 1 (x)) 2 dv(x) M where d 2,x (g 0 (x), g 1 (x)) is the distance in SL n /SO n ; = H(x), H(x) g 0 (x) dv(x). M For us Ω 2 2 is a random variable whose distribution we shall compute. Note: only depends on H, hence it suffices to consider the Gaussian measure on {H : M a}.

L 2 or Ebin distance between can be computed as follows [Ebin, Clarke]: Ω 2 2 (g0, g 1 ) := d 2,x (g 0 (x), g 1 (x)) 2 dv(x) M where d 2,x (g 0 (x), g 1 (x)) is the distance in SL n /SO n ; = H(x), H(x) g 0 (x) dv(x). M For us Ω 2 2 is a random variable whose distribution we shall compute. Note: only depends on H, hence it suffices to consider the Gaussian measure on {H : M a}.

In local coordinates, let a x = diag(exp(b 1 (x)), exp(b 2 (x)),..., exp(b n (x))), where n j=1 b j(x) = 0, x M. Then d x (g 0 x, g 1 x ) 2 = n b j (x) 2. j=1 Accordingly, Ω 2 (g 0, g 1 ) 2 = M n b j (x) 2 dv(x). j=1

π n : R n {x : x j = 0} standard projection. P n - matrix of π n (in the usual basis of R n ) with singular values Then in distribution (1,..., 1, 0) := µ i,n, 1 i n. Ω 2 2 D = j β 2 j n µ 2 i,n W i,j i=1 where W i,j χ 2 1 are i.i.d. We get Ω2 D 2 = j β2 j V j where V j χ 2 n 1 are i.i.d.

Theorem 8. Moment generating function of Ω 2 2 : M Ω 2(t) = E(exp(tΩ 2 2 2 )) = j = n 2tµ j i=1(1 2 i,n β2 j ) 1/2 = j Characteristic function of Ω 2 2 : n M χ 2(tµ 2 1 i,n β2 j ) i=1 (1 2tβ 2 j ) (n 1)/2 n j i=1(1 2itµ 2 i,n β2 j ) 1/2 = j (1 2itβ 2 j ) (n 1)/2

Corollary 9. Tail estimates for Ω 2 2 : applying results of Laurent-Massart, one can show that Prob{Ω 2 2 s2 } exp( s 2 /(2β1 2 )).