SUMMARY OF EXPERIMENTAL CORE TURBULENCE CHARACTERISTICS IN OH AND ECRH T-1 TOKAMAK PLASMAS V. Vershkov, L.G. Eliseev, S.A. Grashin. A.V. Melnikov, D.A. Shelukhin, S.V. Soldatov, A.O. Urazbaev and T-1 team th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Vilamoura, Portugal, 1 6 November, 4
GOAL OF INVESTIGATIONS TO UNDERSTAND THE PHYSICAL MECHANISMS OF PLASMA TURBULENCE. WITH THIS AIM : 1. None-linear turbulence greatly complicates the identification of the physical mechanisms as it distort the spectra. In order to evaluate non-linear properties the investigations were conducted in the wide range of discharge types from the highest Ohmic confinement with peaked density up to the degraded high power heated discharges.. Diagnostics capable of obtaining spatial structure, propagation properties of turbulence (correlation reflectometry, multipine Langmuir probes and HIBP) were used 3. Radial, poloidal and absolute sensitivity of reflectometry to the local density fluctuations were especially checked with full wave D electromagnetic code. 4. Direct comparison of all three diagnostics were carried out in order to increase reliability of the results.
The Schematics of T-1 diagnostics. Scheme of poloidal correlations Circular limiter Rail Limiter Antenna array 1 poloidally and radially separated Langmuir probes O-mode correlation reflectometer, poloidal, radial and toroidal correlations in n cr range from.8 to 7.8 1 19 m -3 Movable multipin Langmuir probes. poloidal and radial correlations of density and floating potential fluctuations Heavy Ion Beam Probe (HIBP) - Plasma potential and secondary ion beam current fluctuations - sample volume ~1cm,bandwidth 1kHz
Variation of fluctuation spectra with radius in T-1 Amplitude [a.u.] Cross-phase [rad] Coherency 1 π -π,6,4,, RUSSIAN RESEARCH CENTRE KURCHATOV INSTITUTE BB r/a L =.68 LFQC HFQC - Frequency [khz] a) LF turb. BB r/a L =.97 dφ/df > b) LFQC dφ/df < r/a L =1.4 SOL turb. dφ/df > - - Frequency [khz] Frequency [khz] c) - Transitions between SOL, Edge, Core clearly seen. - Spectrum in core have five components, including spectral maxima at zero, 15 3, 1 and khz, situated at the background of broad band
Turbulence types characterization by radial correlations Poloidal Shift [cm] Crosscoerlation Low Frequency QuasiCoherent Phase Amplitude Broad Band Λ R =.5cm,4,,,, -, -4, Λ R =4. cm 4 1,,8 Λ R =1.5cm,6,6,4,4,,, 4,, Λ pol =1.6cm Φ=54 o, 4 - -, -4-4, 4 4 4 R [cm] R [cm] R [cm] ρ ϕ ω - Three turbulence types have different radial correlation length and phase shift -Zero radial phase shift in LF and long radial length makes LF similar to STREAMERS? Radial phase shift of QC may be explained by rotation of helical fingers, obtained in 3D gyrokinetic simulations due to the toroidal mode coupling of several modes Broad Band (BB) has the lowest correlation length, corresponding to exitation of a single high m number modes. Reality of BB supported by Langmuir probes spectra
Oscillations in frequency range 15 3 кhz ( I ) Fourier amplitude [a.u.]. 1.5 1..5..4. HIBP Ion beam current ρ =.93, ρ =.7 HIBP plasma potential. 1 3 4 5 Frequency [khz],,,4,6,8 1, 8,,,4,6,8 1, r/a L Set of strong oscillations are observed in 15 3 khz range by reflectometry, Langmuir probes and HIBP Potential fluctuations are much higher then density Localized near m/n=/1 island, shifts with q= position Several frequencies observed inside the m= island MODE are also observed near other rational surfaces Amplitude [a.u.] 6 4 6 4 I plasma = ka I plasma =3 ka m/n=/1 "5 khz" A m p l i t u d e [a. u.] 5 5 5 5 5 5 m=, n=16 khz MHD island 4 6 8 3 Radius [cm] khz 3 khz MODE has no poloidal phase shift, m=, verified by poloidal correlation at 5 and 55 MODE exists only at densities lower then n e = 1 19 m -3 All properties (m=, strong E r, frequency Cs/πR rising as Te 1/ ) similar to the Geodesic Acoustic Mode, which is the branch of Zonal Flows, predicted by Theory Theories predict uniform distribution of zonal flows experiment shows localization of modes near the rational surfaces!!! At zero frequencies modes have not found yet!!
Oscillations in frequency range 15 3 кhz ( II ) Radial phase shift Modulation of the total level of density fluctuations with f>5 khz φ r [π rad],6 k=δφr /δ r =.78 rad/cm,5,4,3,,1, 1 r [cm] Amp. [a.u.] Cross phase [π] Coherency,6,4,, 1,5 1,,5,,8,6,4, Envelope of quasi-coherent oscillations Phase of reflectometer signal, 4 6 8 1 Frequency [khz] 1. Radial width of the mode from amplitude and phase measurements in the range 4 8 cm 1. 1% modulation of the total fluctuation level in 5< f <4 khz at mode frequency. 9% coherency 3. Coherency rises to zero frequency
Amplitude [a.u.] The physics of two types of quasi-coherent fluctuations k ρ i γ [1 5 s -1 ] γ [1 4 c -1 ],.6.4.. 1 δn/n [a.u.] 8 6 4 1 1 RUSSIAN RESEARCH CENTRE KURCHATOV INSTITUTE,4 LF QC HF QC LFS HFS 1 3 4 Frequency [khz] n e broad ITG DTEM BRI ITG.4.6.8 1. DTEM LFQC HFQC.4.8 ρ ρ = r / a n e peaked ITG HFQC DTEM.4.8 ρ HFQC LFQC Velocity shear zone LFQC HF and LF QC not correlated and differs in space - both are seen at LFS, but only HF at HFS k ρ i value for LF QC in core close to.3, predicted for ITG instability k ρ i value for HF QC oscillations in core close to 1, predicted for DTEM instability Radial dependences of growth rates clearly show three regions of DTEM, ITG and BRI instabilities localization HF QC oscillations maximal in gradient region in agreement with DTEM growth rate LF QC oscillations minimal near a/ in zone of minimum η i typical for ITG LF QC is stabilized from 1 to 17.5 cm at peaked density, where η i decreases lower then some critical value, although γ? Strong gas influx broadens density profile, increases η i and destabilizes LF QC
Amplitude [a.u.] δn e /n e [%] Turbulence dependence on density in discharge.6.4.. 1..5 1..5 RUSSIAN RESEARCH CENTRE KURCHATOV INSTITUTE n e /n Gr =.17. -4 - LFQC -4 - -4 - OH ECRH n e /n Gr =.35 HFQC....4.6.8 1. n e /n Gr LFQC n e /n Gr =.44 HFQC n e /n Gr =.5 n e /n Gr =.3 n e /n Gr =.53 Frequency [khz] LF QC (ITG) oscillations dominate at low density. HF QC (DTEM) oscillations dominate at high density. This tendency is similar for OH and ECRH. LF QC (ITG) instability at low density may be connected with high neutral particle penetration to the plasma center. Neutrals do not penetrate in plasma core at higher densities, and DTEM instability dominates in this case Relative fluctuation level for ρ=.5 seems not depend on density Turbulence increases in a factor of two in ECRH in accordance with confinement degradation Quasi-Coherent input in spectrum drastically decreases with increase of heating power and turbulence level. This is consistent with destruction of toroidal coupling by zonal flows
q(a)=.5 (OH) Turbulence rotation q(a)=3.9 OH +ECRH Ω [1 4 rad/s] Poloidal number k pol ρ i 3 1 6 4,6,4, Ω m= q= position HF QC LF QC,,4,6,8 1, ρ HF QC LF QC Velocity shear zone Ω [1 4 rad/s] Poloidal number k pol ρ i 1 6 4,4,, Ohmic ECRH LF QC Ohmic LF QC ERCH HF QC Ohmic q= position,,4,6,8 ρ Ω m= Angular rotation and poloidal m number of LF and HF QC fluctuations are constant along radius in core OH plasma (rigid body rotation) in OH T-1 plasma. (Strong long distance toroidal coupling??) Turbulence velocity closely related with m/n=/1 MHD island velocity in stationary conditions (Coupling with MHD??). Rigid body rotation easily breaks under strong edge cooling either by gas puff or pellet injection
T e [kev] 1,4 1, 1,,8 RUSSIAN RESEARCH CENTRE KURCHATOV INSTITUTE Turbulence behavior in off axis ECRH R /L T e =4,6 E C R H 5-1 m s after E C R H O h m ic,4 R /L T =16 e,1,,3,4,5 R a d iu s [ c m ] Relative density fluctuation amplitude during ECRH are higher in -3 times then in OH phase, in spite of low R/Lt=4 temperature gradient, connected with high particles influx. 1. <δn > 1/ /n [a. u.] Coherency ] -1 rad c 4 ω [1 pol 1..8.6.4...1..3.4.5. 4. 3.. 1 ρ = r/a.. 1.. 3. 4. 5 ρ = r / a, 5, 1, 5 1,, 5 E C R H p o s i t i o n Strong electron temperature gradient R/Lt=16 and local minimum of turbulence amplitude and coherency are observed at ρ ~.3 15 ms after ECRH switch of. This proves e-itb Velocity shear is NOT observed. Possible mechanism of ITB decrease of a number of rational surfaces near q=1 surface at low magnetic shear.,,, 4, 6, 8 ρ = r / a
I SXR Turbulence level D α η e 6 5 4 3 3 1 R/L(Ne) R/L Te Coherency 3 1 1,,5 Amplitude [a.u.] Ne gas puff, 38 39 4 41 4 43 44 Time [ms] 1,4,, 3 1 1 5 3 1 d=5cm d=16.cm Shot 394 5-18 khz Fast edge cooling 18-3 khz LF peak HF peak ECRH ECRH switch on 49 5 51 5 Time [ms] Fast plasma edge cooling in OH plasma Edge cooling with Ne puff at 4 ms leads to: Strong decrease of edge D α light; Drop within 1 ms of HF QC turbulence at ρ=.4; Increase within ms of the core SXR radiation; Density peaking. Possible explanation: Strong decrease of the edge rotation, causing temporal velocity shear between edge and core and suppression of QC turbulence due to velocity shear. Turbulence at the beginning stage of ECRH Ohmic confinement may maintains up to ms after ECRH start. Delay of Confinement Deterioration in ASDEX with NBI, in T-1 with ECRH. HF QC fluctuations dominant at the first 5 15 ms at increased electron temperature gradient and low particles influx. LF QC substitute them after particle influx rise and density profile broadening. Excitation of TEM with transition to ITG after density profile broadening is consistent with theory.
Conclusions I 1. Turbulence spectra retain the features of the linear instability stage in high OH confinement discharges. These features steadily vanishes with the transition to strong non-linear regime.. The Broad Band turbulence with minimal radial scale arises due to stochastic excitation of a single high m modes, while Quasi- Coherent represent toroidal coupling of several modes. 3. Experiment consistent with the existing of three different instabilities: in core - ITG (LF QC) and DTEM (HF QC); and Ballooning Resistive Interchange in SOL. 4. LF QC (ITG) typically associated with the regions with high level of particles fluxes at plasma edge and low density, or with flat density gradient in center zone. 5. HF QC (DTEM), in difference, typical for low particles fluxes region and high electron temperature gradients.
Conclusions II 6. OH and ECRH discharges showed the transition from LF to HF QC with increase of density from low up to critical. The integrate turbulence level not depends on n e, despite change of the mode type. Turbulence level at half radius increases with total power 7. Special modes near 15 3 khz were observed with properties of Geodesic Acoustic Mode, which is a the branch of zonal flows. But its localization at rational surfaces contradict to existing theories. The predicted zonal flows near zero frequency haven t seen yet. 8. QC oscillations tends to rotate as a rigid body with velocity of MHD m/n=/1 island that suppose mechanism of long distance interaction between fluctuations at different radii and global MHD modes. This interaction could be destroyed by the relatively weak velocity shear (SOC-IOC, cold puff) 9. Significant progress were achieved both in experimental turbulence characterization and in theory, but, unfortunately, only a few works devoted to their direct comparison.