The PLANCK Cluster Catalog:

Similar documents
Sébastien C. VAUCLAIR, OMP, Toulouse

High redshift clusters and their evolution. M.Arnaud (CEA-Sap Saclay France)

Testing gravity on cosmological scales with the observed abundance of massive clusters

The X-ray view of Planck SZ clusters

Detection of hot gas in multi-wavelength datasets. Loïc Verdier DDAYS 2015

PLANCK SZ CLUSTERS. M. Douspis 1, 2

Cosmological Constraints from the XMM Cluster Survey (XCS) Martin Sahlén, for the XMM Cluster Survey Collaboration The Oskar Klein Centre for

Astrophysics and Cosmology with Galaxy Clusters (an overview) Hans Böhringer Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik, Garching

Distant Clusters of Galaxies in a Deep XMM-Newton Observation

Planck 2014 The Microwave Sky in Temperature and Polarisation Ferrara, 1 5 December The Planck mission

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 6 Sep 2000

Weighing the Giants:

Cosmology with Galaxy Clusters. V. The Cluster Mass Function

STUDY OF THE LARGE-SCALE STRUCTURE OF THE UNIVERSE USING GALAXY CLUSTERS

THE SUNYAEV-ZELDOVICH EFFECT

Luminous Galaxy Clusters from the XMM Archive Possibilites and Limitations

CONTENTS AIM OF THE PROJECT. INTRODUCTION: AGNs, XMM-Newton, ROSAT. TECHNIQUES: IDL, SQL, Catalogues RESULTS SUMMARY DESIRED OUTPUTS QUESTIONS

CMB studies with Planck

X-raying High-Redshift AGNs and the First Black Holes: From Chandra to Lynx

arxiv: v3 [astro-ph.co] 24 Jun 2010

SUNYAEV-ZEL'DOVICH EFFECT WITH PLANCK SURVEYOR. Institut d'astrophysique Spatiale, B^atiment 121, Universitçe Paris Sud, F Orsay Cedex, France

Results from the 2500d SPT-SZ Survey

THE PLANCK MISSION The most accurate measurement of the oldest electromagnetic radiation in the Universe

Sterile neutrinos in Cosmology

Observational Cosmology

Star formation in XMMU J : a massive galaxy cluster at z=1.4

Multi-wavelength scaling relations (scaling relations 101)

The XXL survey. Jon Willis, Marguerite Pierre, Florian Pacaud, Ben Maughan, Maggie Lieu, Sebastien Lavoie, Adam Mantz et al.

New Galaxy Groups from the RASS. Thomas Reiprich

Cold Cores on Planck1,

Cosmology The Road Map

Title Sunyaev Zel dovich Signal & Cross Correlations

Galaxy Clusters in Stage 4 and Beyond

Study the large-scale structure of the universenovember using galaxy 10, 2016 clusters 1 / 16

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 6 Dec 1999

First Results from the Planck satellite A satellite to measure the Universe

Clusters physics and evolution from new X- ray/sz samples

The XMM Cluster Survey: predicted overlap with the Planck Cluster Catalogue

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 6 Mar 2006

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 6 Jun 2001

A Library of the X-ray Universe: Generating the XMM-Newton Source Catalogues

X-ray Cluster Cosmology

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.co] 20 Jan 2015

The perspective of X-ray galaxy clusters with the XIFU/Athena instrument

The Distribution of Stellar Mass in Galaxy Clusters since z=1

The effect of large scale environment on galaxy properties

ROSAT Roentgen Satellite. Chandra X-ray Observatory

Cosmology with galaxy clusters?

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.co] 12 Aug 2013

THE XMM-LSS CLUSTER SAMPLE AND ITS COSMOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS. M. Pierre, F. Pacaud 1 and the XMM-LSS consortium 2 ABSTRACT

The Southern SHARC catalogue: a ROSAT survey for distant galaxy clusters

Analyzing the CMB Brightness Fluctuations. Position of first peak measures curvature universe is flat

LSST, Euclid, and WFIRST

Cosmology. Introduction Geometry and expansion history (Cosmic Background Radiation) Growth Secondary anisotropies Large Scale Structure

Modelling the Sunyaev Zeldovich Scaling Relations

Results from the Chandra Deep Field North

Cosmology and astrophysics with galaxy clusters

On the Trail of the Most Massive Clusters in the Universe!

Multiwavelength Analysis of CLASH Clusters

Tesla Jeltema. Assistant Professor, Department of Physics. Observational Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics

The Cosmic Microwave Background

EUCLID Spectroscopy. Andrea Cimatti. & the EUCLID-NIS Team. University of Bologna Department of Astronomy

Mapping the non thermal emission in Coma cluster of galaxies using the FeXXV/FeXXVI line ratio

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 6 May 2004

Cross-Correlation of Cosmic Shear and Extragalactic Gamma-ray Background

Dark matter in galaxy clusters

OVERVIEW OF NEW CMB RESULTS

THE XMM-NEWTON WIDE-FIELD SURVEY IN THE COSMOS FIELD: STATISTICAL PROPERTIES OF CLUSTERS OF GALAXIES

Identifying distant* hidden monsters with NuSTAR

Herschel and Planck: ESA s New Astronomy Missions an introduction. Martin Kessler Schloss Braunshardt 19/03/2009

CCAT Sunyaev-Zeldovich Effect Science and Telescope Requirements

The role of Planck in understanding galaxy cluster radio halos

ChaMP SERENDIPITOUS GALAXY CLUSTER SURVEY

Luke Leisman Calvin College. Photo Credit: SLOAN Digital Sky Survey. Great Lakes Cosmology Workshop June 15, 2010

80 2 Observational Cosmology L and the mean energy

Clusters, lensing and CFHT reprocessing

The Sunyaev-Zeldovich eect

Chandra Analysis of a Possible Cooling Core Galaxy Cluster at z = 1.03

THE EVOLUTION OF X-RAY CLUSTERS

4.3 Planck. Scientific goals. Planck payload

Dark Energy: Measuring the Invisible with X-Ray Telescopes

Cosmology with Planck clusters. Nabila Aghanim IAS, Orsay (France)

Planck. Report on the status of the mission Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA

Precision Cosmology with X-ray and SZE Galaxy Cluster Surveys?

X-ray Clusters at High Redshift

New techniques to measure the velocity field in Universe.

CHANDRA CLUSTER COSMOLOGY PROJECT III: COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETER CONSTRAINTS

The Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect in galaxy clusters

X- ray surface brightness fluctuations and turbulence in galaxy clusters. Jeremy Sanders. Andy Fabian. Sanders & Fabian 2011, MNRAS, submitted

AC Fabian, M. Cappi, J Sanders. Cosmic Feedback from AGN

Lecture 37 Cosmology [not on exam] January 16b, 2014

Galaxy groups: X-ray scaling relations, cool cores and radio AGN

SZ Effect with ALMA. Kaustuv moni Basu (MPIfR / Universität Bonn)

A Measurement of the Kinetic SZ Signal Towards MACS J0717.5

Determining neutrino masses from cosmology

Announcements. Homework. Set 8now open. due late at night Friday, Dec 10 (3AM Saturday Nov. 11) Set 7 answers on course web site.

Olbers Paradox. Lecture 14: Cosmology. Resolutions of Olbers paradox. Cosmic redshift

Power spectrum exercise

RCUS. MIT Kavli Institute. 1 Summary. 2 Diffuse Sky Simulation. MEMORANDUM November 16, 2017

The interplay between the brightest cluster galaxy and the intra-cluster medium via AGN feedback.

Transcription:

The PLANCK Cluster Catalog: SZ/X-ray Expected Properties Antoine Chamballu James G. Bartlett Jean-Baptiste Melin in the framework of the Planck consortium

The Planck mission Background Successfully launched on May 14 th 2009 from Kourou C. Lawrence All-sky CMB survey made from L2 Nominal mission: 14 months (2 skies) Survey started on August 13 th 2

The Planck mission Background Successfully launched on May 14 th 2009 from Kourou First Light Survey press release All-sky CMB survey made from L2 Nominal mission: 14 months (2 skies) Survey started on August 13 th ESA, LFI & HFI Consortia (Planck), Background image: Axel Mellinger 2

The Planck mission SZ observations 9 frequency bands giving a good spectral coverage of the SZ spectrum Volume & depth massive clusters up to z 1 Many clusters marginally resolved selection function depends on cluster profile photometry depends on source profile (precision on the size) Planck Blue Book 3

The Planck mission SZ observations 9 frequency bands giving a good spectral coverage of the SZ spectrum Rosati et al. 2002 Volume & depth massive clusters up to z 1 Many clusters marginally resolved selection function depends on cluster profile photometry depends on source profile (precision on the size) RASS (1990-1991) Planck Cluster Catalog (PCC) 3

The Planck Cluster Catalog Expected properties Multi-Matched Filter (Melin et al. 2006) Planck Sky Model (PSM) (Delabrouille et al.) WMAP-5 cosmology (Dunkley et al. 2008) Universal pressure profile (Arnaud et al. 2009) Self-similar scaling in mass and redshift: r < 5 r 500 Jenkins mass function Filter fluctuations on smallest scales Planck simulations: PSM WG2 Challenge 0.00016 arcmin 2 0.00047 arcmin 2 Not flux limited Conversion from M 500 to M Jenkins 4

The Planck Cluster Catalog Expected properties σ 8 = 0.856 σ 8 = 0.796 σ 8 = 0.817 4

The Planck Cluster Catalog Expected properties Point source approximation Fiducial model 4

Model basis Scaling relations: M 500 -T relation (Arnaud et al. 2005, Vikhlinin et al. 2006) 1.5 T M 500 =4.1 h 1 (z) [10 14 M ] 5 kev L-M 500 relation(s) (Pratt et al. 2008) 1.53 M 500 L X =0.38 2 10 14 h 7/3 (z) [10 44 ergs/s] M Mass function from Jenkins et al. 2001 Mass conversion assuming NFW profile for dark matter with c = 4.3 WMAP-5 cosmology (Dunkley et al. 2008), except for σ 8 which is determined from local counts (400sd) 5

Model validation σ 8 = 0.856±0.01, from 400sd (Burenin et al. 2007) consistent within 2σ with WMAP-5 Validation on: local and high-z XLFs (Mullis et al. 2004) well reproduced REFLEX (Böhringer et al. 2004) redshift distributions 6

Model validation σ 8 = 0.856±0.01, from 400sd (Burenin et al. 2007) consistent within 2σ with WMAP-5 Validation on: local and high-z XLFs (Mullis et al. 2004) well reproduced REFLEX (Böhringer et al. 2004) redshift distributions 6

Model validation σ 8 = 0.856±0.01, from 400sd (Burenin et al. 2007) consistent within 2σ with WMAP-5 Validation on: local and high-z XLFs (Mullis et al. 2004) well reproduced REFLEX (Böhringer et al. 2004) redshift distributions 6

Comparison with existing surveys NORAS and REFLEX surveys (Böhringer et al. 2000, 2004): 30 000 deg 2 900 clusters Planck: 3000 (1600) clusters bigger volume efficient at high redshifts (flatter distribution) New massive high-z clusters 7

Comparison with existing surveys Overlap between both catalogs: 890 (570) clusters, i.e. 30% (34%) of the Planck catalog, with f x 3.10-12 erg/s/cm 2 determination of scaling laws (Y SZ -L X, Y SZ -Y X, Y SZ -T X, Y SZ -M...) help in the determination of SZ fluxes when cluster size known from X-ray Clusters only in the RASS some have high SZ fluxes, but are left undetected by Planck determination of the Planck selection function via observations 8

Planck new clusters Characteristics Predicted number of clusters σ 8 =0.796 σ 8 =0.856 All 1 672 3 005 New clusters 1 104 2 112 z 0.6 95 278 0.8 z<1.0 20 65 z 1.0 8 32 9

Targeted clusters Most massive (hottest) and distant clusters: more useful for cosmological studies hot T 6keV; distant z > 0.6 Bright X-ray clusters bright f x (0.5-2 kev) 10-13 erg s -1 cm -2 T estimated with 10% error with exposure time 55ks MS1054-0321 (Gioia et al. 2001): z = 0.847±0.05; T = 7.2±0.7 kev; f x [0.5-2]keV = 1.9±0.09 10-13 erg s -1 cm -2 exposure time: 25 ks 10

Targeted clusters Most massive (hottest) and distant clusters: more useful for cosmological studies hot T 6keV; distant z > 0.6 Bright X-ray clusters bright f x (0.5-2 kev) 10-13 erg s -1 cm -2 T estimated with 10% error with exposure time 55ks ClJ1226.9+3332 (Maughan et al. 2007): z = 0.89±0.05; T = 10.4±0.6 kev; f x [0.5-2]keV = 3 10-13 erg s -1 cm -2 M 500 = 5.2±1.0 10 14 M exposure time: 70 ks 10

More numbers Characteristics Predicted number of clusters σ 8 =0.796 σ 8 =0.856 z 0.6 95 278 T 6 kev; z 0.6 93 275 T 6 kev; z 1.0 8 32 T 6 kev; z 0.6; f x > 10 13 ergs/s/cm 2 92 271 T 6 kev; z 1.0; f x > 10 13 ergs/s/cm 2 7 29 Most of the new distant clusters are hot... and bright in X-rays Significant increase compared to the number of known clusters 11

More numbers Characteristics Predicted number of clusters σ 8 =0.796 σ 8 =0.856 z 0.6 95 278 T 6 kev; z 0.6 93 275 T 6 kev; z 1.0 8 32 T 6 kev; z 0.6; f x > 10 13 ergs/s/cm 2 92 271 T 6 kev; z 1.0; f x > 10 13 ergs/s/cm 2 7 29 Most of the new distant clusters are hot... and bright in X-rays Significant increase compared to the number of known clusters 11

More numbers Characteristics Predicted number of clusters σ 8 =0.796 σ 8 =0.856 z 0.6 95 278 T 6 kev; z 0.6 93 275 T 6 kev; z 1.0 8 32 T 6 kev; z 0.6; f x > 10 13 ergs/s/cm 2 92 271 T 6 kev; z 1.0; f x > 10 13 ergs/s/cm 2 7 29 Most of the new distant clusters are hot... and bright in X-rays Significant increase compared to the number of known clusters 11

Significant increase... compared to what? Mantz et al. 2009 Monique Arnaud Includes EMSS, MACS, NORAS, REFLEX, SHARC, 160sd, 400sd, RDCS and WARPs 238 clusters with z < 0.5 Allen et al. 2007 12

PCC SZ/X-ray Properties Summary Planck has started its first full-sky survey of the CMB Planck will observe all of the most massive clusters, and all of the distant Planck clusters will be massive. Almost all of them are going to be bright enough in X-rays to be observed (with 10% error on T) in 55ks or less with X-ray satellites All this motivates the X-ray follow-up of the most relevant/easily identifiable of those clusters, in the frame of a few-ms Very Large Project with XMM. 13