Carpathians Unite mechanism of consultation and cooperation for implementation of the Carpathian Convention

Similar documents
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CARPATHIAN INTEGRATED BIODIVERSITY INFORMATION SYSTEM

16540/14 EE/cm 1 DG E 1A

MODELS AND TOOLS FOR GOVERNANCE OF

PROTOCOL ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ALPINE CONVENTION OF 1991 RELATING TO SPATIAL PLANNING AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

European Landscape Convention in the Slovak Republic

HELSINKI COMMISSION Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission

Strengthening the cooperation in the region: Carpathian, Tisa,, Danube and Black Sea areas

Carpathian Project Outcomes. Carpathian Strategic Workshop on Spatial Planning 26./ Vienna

EUSAIR on sea topics from Slovenian perspective

The National Spatial Strategy

SPLAN-Natura Towards an integrated spatial planning approach for Natura th January, 2017 Brussels. Commissioned by DG Environment

Maritime Spatial Planning in the Baltic Sea Region

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 2 May /14 CULT 68

Natura 2000 and spatial planning. Executive summary

COUNCIL OF EUROPE S SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT POLICY

Declaration Population and culture

Adaptation to Climate Change in other Mountain Regions

Evaluation Model for the Sustainable Development of European Coastal Zones

Alps Results from the ESPON Project. Common spatial perspectives for the Alpine area. Towards a common vision

The European territory: Strategic developmentd

Stepping into the sea - New evidence on territorial development and the opportunities and risks for European seas and maritime regions

Maritime Spatial Planning in the Baltic Sea Region

CLLD Cooperation OFFER

Resolution XIII.23. Wetlands in the Arctic and sub-arctic

Navigable maritime and river waterways in the seaside - Danube Delta area and the connected rural development

ICZM and MSP in the Black Sea Region

THE SEVILLE STRATEGY ON BIOSPHERE RESERVES

The ESPON Programme. Goals Main Results Future

Annex I. Common criteria for the choice of Protected Marine and Coastal Areas that could be included in SPAMI list

CEMAT results - over the years

Compact guides GISCO. Geographic information system of the Commission

World Oceans Day 2010 Our oceans: opportunities and challenges

Maria Andrzejewska UNEP/GRID Warsaw Centre

Margarita Stancheva Hristo Stanchev & Robert Young 2. MEDCOAST JUBILEE WORKSHOP May 2015, Iberotel Sarigerme Park, Dalaman, Turkey

Country Fiche Lithuania

Land Use and Land cover statistics (LUCAS)

1. Baltic SCOPE Towards coherence and cross-border solutions in Baltic Maritime Spatial Plans

Council conclusions on Arctic issues. 2985th FOREIGN AFFAIRS Council meeting Brussels, 8 December 2009

Statutory framework of the world network of biosphere reserves UNESCO General Conference 1996

Third Cohesion report February 2004

EO4SEE - THE PATHFINDER OF OPERATIONAL SATELLITE MONITORING FOR THE REGION OF THE BLACK SEA AND CENTRAL EUROPE

Land Use in the context of sustainable, smart and inclusive growth

The Strategy of Regional Development of the Carpathians Carpathian Horizon 2020

Policy framework The Netherlands and the Polar Regions, Summary and priorities

KUNMING FORUM ON UNITED NATIONS GLOBAL GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT CITIES OF THE FUTURE: SMART, RESILIENT

OPINION. Results of EU Structural Policy in NSPA

WELCOME & INTRODUCTION

Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services

Launch of the ESPON 2013 Programme. European observation network on territorial development and cohesion

cooperating sites as the three initial units of a new Southern Appalachian Biosphere Reserve, approved by UNESCO in 1988.

Statutory Framework of Biosphere Reserves. The Statutory Framework of the World Network of Biosphere Reserves

Harmonizing spatial databases and services at local and regional level

Interregional Cooperation in the Apennines

Maritime Spatial Planning: Transboundary Cooperation in the Celtic Seas Looking Ahead

Current LCLUC challenges in SCERIN: Assessing Ecosystem Function and Processes

Economic and Social Council

ACRONYMS AREAS COUNTRIES MARINE TERMS

Management Planning & Implementation of Communication Measures for Terrestrial Natura 2000 Sites in the Maltese Islands Epsilon-Adi Consortium

UN-GGIM: Strengthening Geospatial Capability

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. [on the report of the Second Committee (A/67/440/Add.2)]

EuroGEOSS Protected Areas Pilot

THE ROLE OF SPATIAL PLANNING IN INTEGRATED COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE INTERREG III B BALTCOAST PROJECT

Cross-border Maritime Spatial Plan for the Black sea - Romania and Bulgaria project

Mediterranean Sea and Territorial Development, Opportunities and Risks

The Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community vs. regional SDI: the shortest way for reaching economic and social development

DETERMINE OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES IN IZMIR

Plan4all (econtentplus project)

ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme. Anneloes van Noordt MC-member Belgium

THE SEVILLE STRATEGY FOR BIOSPHERE RESERVES BIOSPHERE RESERVES: THE FIRST TWENTY YEARS

Multinational Spatial Planning Experience

ESPON support for Targeted Analyses Ilona Raugze Director

Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. establishing an infrastructure for spatial information in the Community

Management of Sediment Quality and Quantity in the Danube River Basin

Legal problems of environmental management. Spatial planning and space management. M. Gajewski 2014 / 2015

Contract title: Technical assistance for multi-annual programming of future cross border cooperation programme in the Romania-Serbia cooperation area

Shetland Islands Council

What is Spatial Planning?

Figure 10. Travel time accessibility for heavy trucks

Baltic Sea Region cooperation in Maritime Spatial Planning - HELCOM/VASAB

IAEG SDGs WG GI, , Mexico City

CHAPTER 4 HIGH LEVEL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK (SDF) Page 95

Biodiversity and Protected Areas Management Project

THE SEVILLE STRATEGY FOR BIOSPHERE RESERVES

UNESCO Thematic Initiative. Astronomy and World Heritage

EXPERT ANALYSIS ON GEOGRAPHICAL SPECIFICITIES

Land Cover and Land Use Diversity Indicators in LUCAS 2009 data

TOWARDS STRATEGIC SPATIAL PLANNING IN JAMAICA: THE NATIONAL SPATIAL PLAN

Country Fiche Latvia Updated October 2016

Contents: LEVANTE DE ALMERÍA A INFORMATION SYSTEM OBJECTIVES AND ACTIONS GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM RESULTS

2018/1 The integration of statistical and geospatial information. The Regional Committee of UN-GGIM: Americas:

Marine Spatial Planning in the Baltic Sea Region

Country Fiche Sweden Updated May 2018

Natura 2000 in the marine environment: state of implementation and next steps

Applying GIS to Coastal Management in Cork Harbour: the Corepoint experience

PROGRAM OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION CHAIRMANSHIP OF THE ARCTIC COUNCIL IN

Towards coherent maritime spatial planning in the Baltic Sea Region, transnational and project perspective Talis Linkaits Head of VASAB Secretariat

HAMILTON DECLARATION ON COLLABORATION FOR THE CONSERVATION OF THE SARGASSO SEA

SPIMA Spatial dynamics and strategic planning in metropolitan areas

Council of Europe Member States for the Sustainable Development of European Mountain Regions

Mediteranean sea issues in the view of ESPON ESaTDOR project and Marine Spatial Planning in Slovenia

Transcription:

Carpathians Unite mechanism of consultation and cooperation for implementation of the Carpathian Convention Zbigniew Niewiadomski, UNEP/GRID-Warsaw Centre First Joint Meeting of the Carpathian Convention Working Groups on Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biological and Landscape Diversity and on Spatial Development 22-24 October 2014, Kluszkowce, Poland PROJECT SUPPORTED BY A GRANT FROM SWITZERLAND THROUGH THE SWISS CONTRIBUTION TO THE ENLARGED EUROPEAN UNION

Introduction to the meeting: the reasons for selecting Pieniny Mts. as the meeting venue the aims of the first ever joint meeting of the two CC Working Groups (in the light of the Convention, its thematic Protocols, and COP Decisions)

Why do we meet in Pieniny Mts.? In March 1924 the League of Nations / Société des Nations (replaced in 1946 by the United Nations Organization) requested Czechoslovakia and Poland to agree upon the exact delineation of the state border (in particular its section along the Dunajec river which you might see on Friday)

3

and sign a protocol facilitating economic relations (e.g. land-use rights) of the local communities and inhabitants of the border region of Jaworzyna :

Two months later Czechoslovakia and Poland signed a bilateral Protocol (Kraków, 6 May 1924) which additionally recommended the Goverments to conclude as soon as possible two new international agreements:

Art. II a) Covention on tourism which would enable and facilitate the development of tourism in the whole mountain border zone of the neighbouring countries

Art. II b) Convention on nature park following the example of the Convention between the USA and Canada on establishing areas reserved for culture, fauna and flora, and local landscape in the border territories of neighbouring countries

The idea of concluding the two above conventions, concerning border areas in the Carpathians explicitly expressed and inscribed in the Kraków Protocol in May 1924 (over 90 years ago) materialized in May 2003, with the signature of the Carpathian Convention having much broader substantive scope and much broader geographical scope (involving seven Carpathian countries)

9

However, the idea of transnational cooperation on the protection of culture, nature and landscape in border zones of neighbouring countries by establishing transboundary protected areas has succesfuly been implemented much earlier:

Waterton-Glacier International Peace Park at the US-Canadian border (World s first transboundary protected area) was designated on 16 June 1932. while the designation of the bilateral nature park in Pieniny Mts. the first transboundary protected area in Europe, established on the basis of the Kraków Protocol (1924) Art. II b) was jointly celebrated in Szczawnica and Červený Kláštor only a month later, on 17 July 1932.

Particularly important for the implementation of the Carpathian Convention is the transboundary cooperation of relevant public administration and spatial planning authorities of neighbouring Parties on spatial planning of border areas which is emphasized in CC Article 5 on spatial planning: 13

CC Art. 5 para 2: The Parties shall aim at coordinating spatial planning in bordering areas, through developing transboundary and/or regional spatial planning policies and programmes, enhancing and supporting co-operation between relevant regional and local institutions. 14

CC Art. 5 para 3: In developing spatial planning policies and programmes, particular attention should, inter alia, be paid to: (a) transboundary transport, energy and telecommunications infrastructure and services, (b) conservation and sustainable use of natural resources, (c) coherent town and country planning in border areas, (d) preventing the cross-border impact of pollution, (e) integrated land use planning, and environmental impact assessments.

CC Art. 9 (on sustainable tourism) recommends the Parties to develop coordinated or joint management plans for transboundary or bordering protected areas, and other sites of touristic interest. 16

17

The Second Meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP2) to the Carpathian Convention (Bucharest, 2008) adopted the first thematic protocol to the Framework Convention: Protocol on conservation and sustainable use of biological and landscape diversity 18

The CC Working Group on Biodiversity is responsible for the implementation of the Protocol on conservation and sustainable use of biological and landscape diversity following the Strategic Action Plan adopted by COP3 in 2011. It should be noted, that the official process for this Protocol has been faster, and so far more successful than under the Alpine Convention:

Alpine Convention Protocol Conservation of nature and countryside Carpathian Convention Protocol on biological and landscape diversity 1994-2000 signature 2002 entry into force (A, D, FL) 2004 entry into force for SLO 2005 entry into force for MC and F 2013 entry into force for Italy by 2014 (20 years since signature) not yet ratified by CH and EU 2008-2009 signature 2010 entry into force (CZ, HU, PL, UA) 2011 entry into force for RO and SK 2011 Biodiv. SAP adoption 2013 entry into force for SRB in 5 years since signature ratified by, and in force for all Parties 21

CC Protocol on conservation and sustainable use of biological and landscape diversity Article 5 Integration of the objectives of conservation and sustainable use of biological and landscape diversity of the Carpathians into sectoral policies 1. The Parties shall take into consideration the objectives of this Protocol in their other policies, in particular on spatial planning and land resources management, water and river basin management, agriculture and forestry, transport and infrastructure, tourism, industry and energy.

CC Protocol on conservation and sustainable use of biological and landscape diversity Article 9 Continuity and connectivity of natural and semi-natural habitats, ecological network in the Carpathians 3. The Parties shall cooperate on establishing an ecological network in the Carpathians, composed of protected areas and other areas significant for biological and landscape diversity of the Carpathians and for coherence of the network.

CC Protocol on conservation and sustainable use of biological and landscape diversity Article 15 Enhancing conservation and sustainable management in the areas outside of protected areas Implementation requires the integration of the obejctives of the Protocol into spatial planning, in particular at regional and local levels in close cooperation of spatial planning and nature conservation authorities.

CC Protocol on conservation and sustainable use of biological and landscape diversity Article 16 Consultation, harmonisation and coordination of measures undertaken in border areas Objective: to improve and ensure the ecological continuity and connectivity of habitats which requires cooperation of spatial planning and nature conservation authorities of neighbouring Parties.

The Third Meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP3) to the Carpathian Convention (Bratislava, 2011) adopted next two thematic protocols: Protocol on sustainable forest management Protocol on sustainable tourism 27

The Protocol on sustainable forest management entered into force in 2013 for five Parties: the Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania, the Slovak Republic, and Ukraine (ratification by Poland and Serbia is pending) and is accompanied by the Strategic Action Plan for its implementation, adopted by COP4 in 2014.

The Protocol on sustainable tourism entered into force in 2013 for four Parties: the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and the Slovak Republic will enter into force for Romania on 11 Nov. 2014 (ratification by Serbia and Ukraine is pending) and is accompanied by the Strategy for its implementation, adopted by COP4 in 2014.

The Fourth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP4) to the Carpathian Convention (Mikulov, Sept. 2014) adopted the fourth thematic protocol: Protocol on sustainable transport signed by four Parties: the Czech Republic, Romania, Serbia and the Slovak Republic (signatures by Hungary, Poland and Ukraine, and ratifications pending). 30

Each of the Protocols to the Convention contains an Article on the integration of the objectives of the Protocol into sectoral policies of the Parties, in particular on spatial planning and land resource management. Simultaneously, the spatial planning policy integrates and harmonizes all other sectoral policies listed in the Convention. 31

Therefore, cooperation of the Parties on spatial planning / development and integration of the objectives of the Convention and its Protocols into the spatial planning and regional development policies of the Parties is an indispensable pre-requisite for the implementation of the Convention and its thematic protocols. 32

The role of spatial planning is also emphasized in the EU Green Infrastructure Strategy

Green Infrastructure (GI) Enhancing Europe s Natural Capital (Communication from the Commission, Brussels, 6.5.2013 COM (2013) 249 final) GI: a strategically planned network of natural and seminatural areas with other environmental features designed and managed to deliver a wide range of ecosystem services. It incorporates green spaces (or blue if aquatic ecosystems are concerned) and other physical features in terrestrial (including coastal) and marine areas. On land, GI is present in rural and urban settings.

36

37

DECISION COP4/2 Spatial development: The Conference of the Parties 1. Reiterates its call upon spatial planning / development local and regional authorities of the Carpathian countries to continue the cooperation on issues relevant for spatial planning to achieve the territorial cohesion of the Carpathian region, in particular on coordinating spatial and management planning in bordering areas (CC Art. 5.2; Art. 5.3; Art. 9.2),

DECISION COP4/2 Spatial development (para 1 continued) (in particular on) promoting transboundary cooperation on sustainable tourism development in the Carpathians (CC Protocol on Sustainable Tourism Art. 20),

DECISION COP4/2 Spatial development (para 1 continued) (in particular on) consultation, harmonization and coordination of measures undertaken in border areas for the conservation of the biological and landscape diversity of the Carpathians (Protocol on Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biological and Landscape Diversity Art. 16), including inputs and support to the development and implementation of relevant projects;

DECISION COP4/2 Spatial development - The Conference of the Parties 2. Recognizes the crucial role of local and regional administration and their spatial planning / development authorities in the successful implementation of the Carpathian Convention and its Protocols and invites them to pursue and strengthen their efforts and to cooperate among each other;

DECISION COP4/1 The Conference of the Parties 8. Encourages the cooperation with the European Landscape Convention and recommends the Working Group on Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biological and Landscape Diversity to guide and coordinate the implementation of the Carpathian Convention in this field ( ) 9. Welcomes the idea of organizing joint meeting of the Working Group on Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biological and Landscape Diversity, and other relevant Working Groups in order to develop the proposed possible activities on ecological connectivity, green infrastructure and landscapes in the Carpathians;

Therefore, the objective of this first ever joint meeting of CC WGs is to: ensure the communication, identify potential synergies, ecourage cooperation, in particular undertaking joint activities by the two Working Groups; as well as to encourage cooperation of authorities responsible for nature / landscape conservation, and spatial planning, at national, regional, transboundary and local levels

with the overall objectives to: facilitate the implementation of the Biodiversity Protocol and its Strategic Action Plan and contribute to achieving the greater territorial cohesion of the Carpathian region. Which could be a long walk in the Carpathian snow, but definitely not a mission impossible!

46

47

Thank you for attention. PROJECT SUPPORTED BY A GRANT FROM SWITZERLAND THROUGH THE SWISS CONTRIBUTION TO THE ENLARGED EUROPEAN UNION Project Secretariat: UNEP/GRID-Warsaw Centre 8 Sobieszyńska Str., 00-764 Warsaw, Poland Phone: (+48) 22 840 66 64; e-mail: sekretariat@karpatylacza.pl 48