Drag force and superfluidity in the supersolid striped phase of a spin-orbit-coupled Bose gas

Similar documents
Superstripes and the excitation spectrum of a spin-orbit-coupled BEC

ROTONS AND STRIPES IN SPIN-ORBIT COUPLED BECs

SYNTHETIC GAUGE FIELDS IN ULTRACOLD ATOMIC GASES

SUPERFLUIDTY IN ULTRACOLD ATOMIC GASES

Effects of spin-orbit coupling on the BKT transition and the vortexantivortex structure in 2D Fermi Gases

Artificial Gauge Fields for Neutral Atoms

Design and realization of exotic quantum phases in atomic gases

Spin-injection Spectroscopy of a Spin-orbit coupled Fermi Gas

Superfluidity of a 2D Bose gas (arxiv: v1)

Roton Mode in Dipolar Bose-Einstein Condensates

Dipolar Interactions and Rotons in Atomic Quantum Gases. Falk Wächtler. Workshop of the RTG March 13., 2014

From BEC to BCS. Molecular BECs and Fermionic Condensates of Cooper Pairs. Preseminar Extreme Matter Institute EMMI. and

Numerical Simulations of Faraday Waves in Binary Bose-Einstein Condensates

Strongly correlated systems in atomic and condensed matter physics. Lecture notes for Physics 284 by Eugene Demler Harvard University

Spinor Bose gases lecture outline

A Mixture of Bose and Fermi Superfluids. C. Salomon

Topological Bandstructures for Ultracold Atoms

From laser cooling to BEC First experiments of superfluid hydrodynamics

Philipp T. Ernst, Sören Götze, Jannes Heinze, Jasper Krauser, Christoph Becker & Klaus Sengstock. Project within FerMix collaboration

Summer School on Novel Quantum Phases and Non-Equilibrium Phenomena in Cold Atomic Gases. 27 August - 7 September, 2007

Superfluid Density of a Spin-orbit Coupled Bose Gas

Strongly correlated systems in atomic and condensed matter physics. Lecture notes for Physics 284 by Eugene Demler Harvard University

Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in Bose-Einstein Condensates

Confining ultracold atoms on a ring in reduced dimensions

Artificial magnetism and optical flux lattices for ultra cold atoms

Interaction-induced Symmetry Protected Topological Phase in Harper-Hofstadter models

Low-dimensional Bose gases Part 1: BEC and interactions

When superfluids are a drag

5. Gross-Pitaevskii theory

Fundamentals and New Frontiers of Bose Einstein Condensation

Bardeen Bardeen, Cooper Cooper and Schrieffer and Schrieffer 1957

Interaction between atoms

Low- and High-Energy Excitations in the Unitary Fermi Gas

Universal trimers in spin-orbit coupled Fermi gases

Dynamic Density and Spin Responses in the BCS-BEC Crossover: Toward a Theory beyond RPA

Physics 127b: Statistical Mechanics. Landau Theory of Second Order Phase Transitions. Order Parameter

Optical Lattices. Chapter Polarization

Ultracold Fermi and Bose Gases and Spinless Bose Charged Sound Particles

Vortices and superfluidity

Vortices and other topological defects in ultracold atomic gases

Introduction to Recent Developments on p-band Physics in Optical Lattices

Topological insulator part II: Berry Phase and Topological index

MACROSCOPIC QUANTUM PHENOMENA IN SPIN- ORBIT COUPLED BOSE- EINSTEIN CONDENSATE AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS

Vortex States in a Non-Abelian Magnetic Field

Superfluidity and superconductivity. IHP, Paris, May 7 and 9, 2007

Collective excitations of ultracold molecules on an optical lattice. Roman Krems University of British Columbia

Conference on Research Frontiers in Ultra-Cold Atoms. 4-8 May Generation of a synthetic vector potential in ultracold neutral Rubidium

Loop current order in optical lattices

We can then linearize the Heisenberg equation for in the small quantity obtaining a set of linear coupled equations for and :

Infinitely long-range nonlocal potentials and the Bose-Einstein supersolid phase

Cooperative Phenomena

Manipulation of Artificial Gauge Fields for Ultra-cold Atoms

Introduction to Cold Atoms and Bose-Einstein Condensation. Randy Hulet

Quantum Quantum Optics Optics VII, VII, Zakopane Zakopane, 11 June 09, 11

Landau Theory of Fermi Liquids : Equilibrium Properties

Experimental realization of spin-orbit coupling in degenerate Fermi gas. Jing Zhang

Synthetic gauge fields in Bose-Einstein Condensates 1. Alexander Fetter Stanford University. University of Hannover, May 2015

Correlated Phases of Bosons in the Flat Lowest Band of the Dice Lattice

Experimental realization of spin-orbit coupled degenerate Fermi gas. Jing Zhang

Supersymmetry breaking and Nambu-Goldstone fermions in lattice models

Workshop on Coherent Phenomena in Disordered Optical Systems May 2014

Fluids with dipolar coupling

Interference between quantum gases

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2008 Final Exam Solutions

Shock waves in the unitary Fermi gas

Ground-state properties, excitations, and response of the 2D Fermi gas

Magnetism in ultracold gases

Electrons in a periodic potential

Low dimensional quantum gases, rotation and vortices

Disordered Ultracold Gases

POEM: Physics of Emergent Materials

6. Interference of BECs

Strongly Correlated Systems of Cold Atoms Detection of many-body quantum phases by measuring correlation functions

BCS-BEC Crossover. Hauptseminar: Physik der kalten Gase Robin Wanke

Nonlinear BEC Dynamics by Harmonic Modulation of s-wave Scattering Length

Magnetic fields and lattice systems

The Quantum Heisenberg Ferromagnet

F. Chevy Seattle May 2011

Michikazu Kobayashi. Kyoto University

Lecture 3. Bose-Einstein condensation Ultracold molecules

Microcavity Exciton-Polariton

BEC AND MATTER WAVES an overview Allan Griffin, University of Toronto

Quantum Theory of Matter

Supplementary Figure 3: Interaction effects in the proposed state preparation with Bloch oscillations. The numerical results are obtained by

Bose-Einstein condensates under rotation: The structures within

Vortices and vortex states of Rashba spin-orbit coupled condensates

Non-equilibrium Dynamics in Ultracold Fermionic and Bosonic Gases

K two systems. fermionic species mixture of two spin states. K 6 Li mass imbalance! cold atoms: superfluidity in Fermi gases

Cold Atomic Gases. California Condensed Matter Theory Meeting UC Riverside November 2, 2008

Optical Flux Lattices for Cold Atom Gases

Quantum superpositions and correlations in coupled atomic-molecular BECs

Dynamic properties of interacting bosons and magnons

Magnetic Crystals and Helical Liquids in Alkaline-Earth 1D Fermionic Gases

Reference for most of this talk:

Static and Dynamic Properties of One-Dimensional Few-Atom Systems

Hydrodynamic solitons in polariton superfluids

Mapping the Berry Curvature of Optical Lattices

Preface Introduction to the electron liquid

Physics 598 ESM Term Paper Giant vortices in rapidly rotating Bose-Einstein condensates

Theory Seminar Uni Marburg. Bose-Einstein Condensation and correlations in magnon systems

Transcription:

/ 6 Drag force and superfluidity in the supersolid striped phase of a spin-orbit-coupled Bose gas Giovanni Italo Martone with G. V. Shlyapnikov Worhshop on Exploring Nuclear Physics with Ultracold Atoms ECT*, Trento, June 9th, 8

/ 6 Introduction Ultracold atomic gases: ideal tool to explore new phenomena

/ 6 Introduction Ultracold atomic gases: ideal tool to explore new phenomena Main advantages: can be formed by bosons, fermions, or mixtures of both;

/ 6 Introduction Ultracold atomic gases: ideal tool to explore new phenomena Main advantages: can be formed by bosons, fermions, or mixtures of both; tunability of interparticle interactions;

/ 6 Introduction Ultracold atomic gases: ideal tool to explore new phenomena Main advantages: can be formed by bosons, fermions, or mixtures of both; tunability of interparticle interactions; large variety of possible energy landscapes: harmonic, periodic, quasiperiodic, disordered,...

/ 6 Introduction Ultracold atomic gases: ideal tool to explore new phenomena Main advantages: can be formed by bosons, fermions, or mixtures of both; tunability of interparticle interactions; large variety of possible energy landscapes: harmonic, periodic, quasiperiodic, disordered,... Interesting question: can one use quantum gases to simulate phenomena related to orbital magnetism or spin-orbit coupling?

/ 6 Introduction Ultracold atomic gases: ideal tool to explore new phenomena Main advantages: can be formed by bosons, fermions, or mixtures of both; tunability of interparticle interactions; large variety of possible energy landscapes: harmonic, periodic, quasiperiodic, disordered,... Interesting question: can one use quantum gases to simulate phenomena related to orbital magnetism or spin-orbit coupling? YES!

Y.-J. Lin et al., Nature 47, 83 () 3 / 6 Light-induced spin-orbit coupling on BECs - I NIST experimental setup: 87 Rb BEC in F = electronic manifold

Y.-J. Lin et al., Nature 47, 83 () 3 / 6 Light-induced spin-orbit coupling on BECs - I NIST experimental setup: 87 Rb BEC in F = electronic manifold Bias magnetic field: Zeeman shift

Y.-J. Lin et al., Nature 47, 83 () 3 / 6 Light-induced spin-orbit coupling on BECs - I NIST experimental setup: 87 Rb BEC in F = electronic manifold Bias magnetic field: Zeeman shift Two counterpropagating Raman lasers Frequencies ω L and ω L + ω L Wavevector difference k r = k r ê x

Y.-J. Lin et al., Nature 47, 83 () 3 / 6 Light-induced spin-orbit coupling on BECs - I NIST experimental setup: 87 Rb BEC in F = electronic manifold Bias magnetic field: Zeeman shift Two counterpropagating Raman lasers Frequencies ω L and ω L + ω L Wavevector difference k r = k r ê x Lasers induce transitions between internal states with strength Ω

Y.-J. Lin et al., Nature 47, 83 () 3 / 6 Light-induced spin-orbit coupling on BECs - I NIST experimental setup: 87 Rb BEC in F = electronic manifold Bias magnetic field: Zeeman shift Two counterpropagating Raman lasers Frequencies ω L and ω L + ω L Wavevector difference k r = k r ê x Lasers induce transitions between internal states with strength Ω close to Raman resonance, δ = ω L ω Z

Y.-J. Lin et al., Nature 47, 83 () 3 / 6 Light-induced spin-orbit coupling on BECs - I NIST experimental setup: 87 Rb BEC in F = electronic manifold Bias magnetic field: Zeeman shift Two counterpropagating Raman lasers Frequencies ω L and ω L + ω L Wavevector difference k r = k r ê x Lasers induce transitions between internal states with strength Ω close to Raman resonance, δ = ω L ω Z + detuned from Raman resonance due to quadratic shift ω q

Y.-J. Lin et al., Nature 47, 83 () 3 / 6 Light-induced spin-orbit coupling on BECs - I NIST experimental setup: 87 Rb BEC in F = electronic manifold Bias magnetic field: Zeeman shift Two counterpropagating Raman lasers Frequencies ω L and ω L + ω L Wavevector difference k r = k r ê x Lasers induce transitions between internal states with strength Ω close to Raman resonance, δ = ω L ω Z + detuned from Raman resonance due to quadratic shift ω q Effective two-level system

4 / 6 Light-induced spin-orbit coupling on BECs - II Single-particle Hamiltonian in rotating-wave approximation h = p m + Ω [ ] σ + e i(krx ωlt) + H.c. ω Z σ z Invariant under helicoidal translations T h (d) = exp [id (p x + k r σ z )]

4 / 6 Light-induced spin-orbit coupling on BECs - II Single-particle Hamiltonian in rotating-wave approximation h = p m + Ω [ ] σ + e i(krx ωlt) + H.c. ω Z σ z Invariant under helicoidal translations T h (d) = exp [id (p x + k r σ z )] Remove space and time dependence through U = e i(krx ω Lt)σ z/ h SO = [ ] (p x k r σ z ) + p + Ω m σ x + δ σ z

4 / 6 Light-induced spin-orbit coupling on BECs - II Single-particle Hamiltonian in rotating-wave approximation h = p m + Ω [ ] σ + e i(krx ωlt) + H.c. ω Z σ z Invariant under helicoidal translations T h (d) = exp [id (p x + k r σ z )] Remove space and time dependence through U = e i(krx ω Lt)σ z/ h SO = [ ] (p x k r σ z ) + p + Ω m σ x + δ σ z Equal-weighted Rashba and Dresselhaus SOCs + Rabi coupling or External spin-dependent gauge potential

5 / 6 Spin-orbit-coupled BEC (single-particle picture) Single-particle Hamiltonian h SO = [ ] (p x k r σ z ) + p + Ω m σ x + δ σ z

5 / 6 Spin-orbit-coupled BEC (single-particle picture) Single-particle Hamiltonian h SO = [ ] (p x k r σ z ) + p + Ω m σ x + δ σ z

5 / 6 Spin-orbit-coupled BEC (single-particle picture) Single-particle Hamiltonian h SO = [ ] (p x k r σ z ) + p + Ω m σ x + δ σ z Energy dispersion Ω = ε± (px) /Er p x /k r

5 / 6 Spin-orbit-coupled BEC (single-particle picture) Single-particle Hamiltonian h SO = [ ] (p x k r σ z ) + p + Ω m σ x + δ σ z Energy dispersion two regimes Ω Ω < 4E r : two degenerate minima ε± (px) /Er ( ) Ω ±k = ±k r 4E r p x /k r

5 / 6 Spin-orbit-coupled BEC (single-particle picture) Single-particle Hamiltonian h SO = [ ] (p x k r σ z ) + p + Ω m σ x + δ σ z Energy dispersion two regimes ε± (px) /Er Ω p x /k r Ω < 4E r : two degenerate minima ( ) Ω ±k = ±k r 4E r Ω 4E r : single minimum k =

6 / 6 Many-body ground state A unique many-body ground state is selected by interactions T.-L. Ho and S. Zhang, PRL 7, 543 () Y. Li, L. P. Pitaevskii, S. Stringari, PRL 8, 53 ()

6 / 6 Many-body ground state A unique many-body ground state is selected by interactions T.-L. Ho and S. Zhang, PRL 7, 543 () Y. Li, L. P. Pitaevskii, S. Stringari, PRL 8, 53 () Look for mean-field ground state: variational ansatz Ψ = ( ) ψ ψ = [ ( ) ( ) ] N cos θ C + e ikx sin θ + C V sin θ e ik x cos θ

6 / 6 Many-body ground state A unique many-body ground state is selected by interactions T.-L. Ho and S. Zhang, PRL 7, 543 () Y. Li, L. P. Pitaevskii, S. Stringari, PRL 8, 53 () Look for mean-field ground state: variational ansatz Ψ = ( ) ψ ψ = [ ( ) ( ) ] N cos θ C + e ikx sin θ + C V sin θ e ik x cos θ Minimization of energy E = { dr Ψ h SO Ψ + g + (Ψ Ψ) + g } (Ψ σ z Ψ), g ± = g ± g

Y. Li, L. P. Pitaevskii, S. Stringari, PRL 8, 53 () 7 / 6 Zero-temperature phase diagram 4 3.5.5.8.6.4. Color: k /k r

Y. Li, L. P. Pitaevskii, S. Stringari, PRL 8, 53 () 7 / 6 Zero-temperature phase diagram 4 3.5.5.8.6.4. Striped phase I Two counter-propagating waves interfere, making a standing wave Color: k /k r Ψ ST = [( ) ( ) ] n cos θ e ikx + e iϕ sin θ e ik x sin θ cos θ

Y. Li, L. P. Pitaevskii, S. Stringari, PRL 8, 53 () 7 / 6 Zero-temperature phase diagram 4 3.5.5.8.6.4. Striped phase I Two counter-propagating waves interfere, making a standing wave Plane-wave phase II Single propagating wave Spin polarization σ z = k /k r Color: k /k r Ψ + PW = n ( ) cos θ e ik x sin θ or Ψ PW = n ( ) sin θ e ik x cos θ

Y. Li, L. P. Pitaevskii, S. Stringari, PRL 8, 53 () 7 / 6 Zero-temperature phase diagram 4 3.5.5 Color: k /k r.8.6.4. Striped phase I Two counter-propagating waves interfere, making a standing wave Plane-wave phase II Single propagating wave Spin polarization σ z = k /k r Zero-momentum phase III Uniform wavefunction Ψ SM = ( ) n

Y. Li, G. I. Martone, L. P. Pitaevskii, S. Stringari, PRL, 353 (3) 8 / 6 Striped phase: ground state properties Periodic structure arising from SO coupl. + nonlinearity of GP theory

Y. Li, G. I. Martone, L. P. Pitaevskii, S. Stringari, PRL, 353 (3) 8 / 6 Striped phase: ground state properties Periodic structure arising from SO coupl. + nonlinearity of GP theory Expand stationary wavefunction into Bloch waves: Ψ(r) = ( ak n + K K b k + K ) e i(k + K)x K reciprocal lattice vectors.7 n, / n.5.3 k x/π

Y. Li, G. I. Martone, L. P. Pitaevskii, S. Stringari, PRL, 353 (3) 8 / 6 Striped phase: ground state properties Periodic structure arising from SO coupl. + nonlinearity of GP theory Expand stationary wavefunction into Bloch waves: Ψ(r) = ( ak n + K K b k + K ) e i(k + K)x K reciprocal lattice vectors.7 λ n, / n.5 C Period of stripes: λ = π/k Contrast C Ω/E r.3 k x/π

Y. Li, G. I. Martone, L. P. Pitaevskii, S. Stringari, PRL, 353 (3) 8 / 6 Striped phase: ground state properties Periodic structure arising from SO coupl. + nonlinearity of GP theory Expand stationary wavefunction into Bloch waves: Ψ(r) = ( ak n + K K b k + K ) e i(k + K)x K reciprocal lattice vectors.7 Spontaneously broken symmetries: n, / n.5.3 k x/π U() superfluidity translational crystalline order

9 / 6 Excitation spectrum in Striped phase 3.5.5

9 / 6 Excitation spectrum in Striped phase 3 Double gapless band structure.5.5

9 / 6 Excitation spectrum in Striped phase 3 Double gapless band structure Two sound modes at q.5.5

9 / 6 Excitation spectrum in Striped phase 3 q B = k.5.5 Double gapless band structure Two sound modes at q Frequency of lowest modes vanishes at Brillouin point q B

/ 6 Static structure factors in Striped phase.8.6.4..5.5.8.6.4..5.5

/ 6 Static structure factors in Striped phase.8.6.4..5.5.8.6.4..5.5 Lower branch: spin mode at low q x, strong density character at q x q B

/ 6 Static structure factors in Striped phase.8.6.4..5.5.8.6.4..5.5 Lower branch: spin mode at low q x, strong density character at q x q B Upper branch: density mode at q x

/ 6 Static structure factors in Striped phase.8.6.4..5.5.8.6.4..5.5 Lower branch: spin mode at low q x, strong density character at q x q B Upper branch: density mode at q x Density structure factor diverges at Brillouin point

G. E. Astrakharchik and L. P. Pitaevskii, PRA 7, 368 (4) / 6 Moving impurity in a BEC. Drag force Consider heavy pointlike impurity moving with velocity v U imp (r, t) = g imp δ(r vt)

G. E. Astrakharchik and L. P. Pitaevskii, PRA 7, 368 (4) / 6 Moving impurity in a BEC. Drag force Consider heavy pointlike impurity moving with velocity v U imp (r, t) = g imp δ(r vt) Assume small g imp, expand condensate order parameter Ψ(r, t) = Ψ (r) + δψ(r, t) Calculate δψ(r, t) by solving linearized Gross-Pitaevskii equation

G. E. Astrakharchik and L. P. Pitaevskii, PRA 7, 368 (4) / 6 Moving impurity in a BEC. Drag force Consider heavy pointlike impurity moving with velocity v U imp (r, t) = g imp δ(r vt) Assume small g imp, expand condensate order parameter Ψ(r, t) = Ψ (r) + δψ(r, t) Calculate δψ(r, t) by solving linearized Gross-Pitaevskii equation Evaluate drag force from standard definition F = dr Ψ (r, t) [ U imp (r, t)] Ψ(r, t) = [Ψ (r, t)ψ(r, t)] r=vt

G. E. Astrakharchik and L. P. Pitaevskii, PRA 7, 368 (4) / 6 Drag force in a standard BEC Drag force in standard BEC (Astrakharchik Pitaevskii s formula) ( ) F C = 4π nb mv c v Θ(v c)ˆv

G. E. Astrakharchik and L. P. Pitaevskii, PRA 7, 368 (4) / 6 Drag force in a standard BEC Drag force in standard BEC (Astrakharchik Pitaevskii s formula) ( ) F C = 4π nb mv c v Θ(v c)ˆv Vanishes at v < v c = c: consistency with Landau criterion Antiparallel to ˆv, proportional to v for large v

G. E. Astrakharchik and L. P. Pitaevskii, PRA 7, 368 (4) / 6 Drag force in a standard BEC Drag force in standard BEC (Astrakharchik Pitaevskii s formula) ( ) F C = 4π nb mv c v Θ(v c)ˆv Vanishes at v < v c = c: consistency with Landau criterion Antiparallel to ˆv, proportional to v for large v Two-component BEC: pure spin and pure density Bogoliubov modes ω d,s (q) = [ q m ( q m + mc d,s )] / Spin mode not excited by moving impurity: zero contribution to F C F C identical to F C with c c d

3 / 6 Drag force in SO-coupled BECs General formula (after time averaging in stripe phase) F = πg imp V q l, q δρ q δ (ω l,q q v) l,q Same structure as in other systems with multiple bands in spectrum

3 / 6 Drag force in SO-coupled BECs General formula (after time averaging in stripe phase) F = πg imp V q l, q δρ q δ (ω l,q q v) l,q Same structure as in other systems with multiple bands in spectrum Critical velocity for exciting l-th branch ω l,q v c,l (ˆv) = min q ˆv> q ˆv Reproduces Landau criterion for anisotropic systems

Drag force in SO-coupled BECs General formula (after time averaging in stripe phase) F = πg imp V q l, q δρ q δ (ω l,q q v) l,q Same structure as in other systems with multiple bands in spectrum Critical velocity for exciting l-th branch ω l,q v c,l (ˆv) = min q ˆv> q ˆv Reproduces Landau criterion for anisotropic systems Noncollinearity of drag force with velocity v = v(cos θ v ˆx + sin θ v ŷ) F = F (cos θ F ˆx + sin θ F ŷ), π/ θ F θ v π/ Collinearity restored (θ F = θ v ) only if θ v =, π/ 3 / 6

G. I. Martone and G. V. Shlyapnikov, arxiv:85.55 4 / 6 Drag force in striped phase v c,l (ˆv) vanishes if ˆv does not lie in yz-plane θf /π 8 8 6 θ v = θ v = π/6 6 8 4 θ v = π/4 6 θ v = π/3 4 θ v = π/ 4 Ω/E r =. Ω/E r =. Ω/E r =...4.6.8..4.6.8.4.4..4.6.8.3.3.3 F........4.6.8 v..4.6.8 v..4.6.8 v

Drag force in striped phase v c,l (ˆv) vanishes if ˆv does not lie in yz-plane θf /π 8 8 6 θ v = θ v = π/6 6 8 4 θ v = π/4 6 θ v = π/3 4 θ v = π/ 4 Ω/E r =. Ω/E r =. Ω/E r =...4.6.8..4.6.8.4.4..4.6.8.3.3.3 F....4.6.8 v....4.6.8 v....4.6.8 v At low v main contribution from l =, modes with q q B F x 6π k b n f ( ) m c v x + v y c, F y 6π k b n f m c 4 v xv y G. I. Martone and G. V. Shlyapnikov, arxiv:85.55 4 / 6

Time scale for energy dissipation τ τ 8 6 4 θ v = θ v = π/6 θ v = π/4 θ v = π/3 θ v = π/ Ω/E r =...4.6.8.5 Define characteristic time for energy dissipation of impurity τ = Ė E = ε χ F v, χ = N imp N.5 Ω/E r =...4.6.8.5 τ.5 Ω/E r =...4.6.8 v G. I. Martone and G. V. Shlyapnikov, arxiv:85.55 5 / 6

Time scale for energy dissipation τ τ 8 6 4 θ v = θ v = π/6 θ v = π/4 θ v = π/3 θ v = π/ Ω/E r =...4.6.8.5.5 Ω/E r =...4.6.8.5 Define characteristic time for energy dissipation of impurity τ = Ė E = ε χ F v, χ = N imp N τ comparable or larger than typical duration of an experiment for a reasonable range of velocities τ.5 Ω/E r =...4.6.8 v G. I. Martone and G. V. Shlyapnikov, arxiv:85.55 5 / 6

6 / 6 Conclusions Main results on spin-orbit-coupled Bose gases: appearance of new quantum phases (striped, spin-polarized) and new phase transitions; striped phase exhibits typical features of supersolidity, including double gapless band structure of excitation spectrum; emergence of a finite drag force for an arbitrarily small velocity of impurity in striped phase; drag force not collinear with direction of the motion; very large characteristic time for energy dissipation.