arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 1 Sep 2009

Similar documents
Liquid xenon gamma-ray calorimeter for the MEG experiment

Final Results from the MEG Experiment and the Status of MEG-II

Results and perspectives of the MEG and MEG II experiments

The MEG/MEGII and Mu3e experiments at PSI. Angela Papa Paul Scherrer Institut on behalf of the MEG/MEGII and Mu3e collaborations

Lepton Flavour Violation

clfv searches using DC muon beam at PSI

Track reconstruction for the Mu3e experiment Alexandr Kozlinskiy (Mainz, KPH) for the Mu3e collaboration DPG Würzburg (.03.22, T85.

MEG II 実験の準備状況と 今後の展望 東京大学 素粒子物理国際研究センター 岩本敏幸 他MEG II コラボレーション 2018年9月14日 日本物理学会2018年秋季大会 信州大学 JSPS Core-to-Core Program

The Mu3e PSI

PoS(TIPP2014)033. Upgrade of MEG Liquid Xenon Calorimeter. Ryu SAWADA. ICEPP, the University of Tokyo

The Mu2e Transport Solenoid

PoS(ICHEP2016)552. The Mu3e Experiment at PSI. Alessandro Bravar University of Geneva

PoS(EPS-HEP2017)238. Experimental limiting factors for the next generation

Update from the Mu3e Experiment

The Mu3e PSI

NA62: Ultra-Rare Kaon Decays

LIQUID XE DETECTOR FOR MU E GAMMA SEARCH

MEG. 2.1 KEK PSI PSI MEG II [4] GeV 2. Tevatron [5] 2017 ( 29 ) 12 12

COMET muon conversion experiment in J-PARC

Status and Future of the PSI Experiment *

PoS(KAON)049. Testing the µ e universality with K ± l ± ν decays

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland. Commissioning of the CMS Detector

Data Analysis for the MEG Experiment. Francesco Renga & Cecilia Voena INFN Roma

The Mu3e Experiment - Goal

Charged Lepton Flavour Violation:

PoS(KAON09)023. Beam Hole Photon Veto For J-PARC K O TO experiment. Yosuke Maeda Kyoto University

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 23 Oct 2007

Overview of the COMET Phase-I experiment

Track Fitting With Broken Lines for the MU3E Experiment

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 1 Oct 2015

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 26 Sep 2018

Emittance Measurement in the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment

Flex-Prints for the Mu3e Experiment

LFV with µ-beams: status and perspectives

MuSIC- RCNP at Osaka University

CsI Calorimeter for KOTO experiment

Kaon Identification at NA62. Institute of Physics Particle, Astroparticle, and Nuclear Physics groups Conference 2015

PoS(EPS-HEP2015)522. The status of MICE Step IV

The MEG experiment at PSI

Muon reconstruction performance in ATLAS at Run-2

2 ATLAS operations and data taking

PoS(KAON)059. Giuseppe Ruggiero. Scuola Normale Superiore and INFN, Pisa, Italy

LHCb Calorimetry Impact

Validation of Geant4 Physics Models Using Collision Data from the LHC

b Physics Prospects For The LHCb Experiment Thomas Ruf for the LHCb Collaboration Introduction Detector Status Physics Program

Kenji Ozone (ICEPP, Univ. of Tokyo, Japan) Outline. Introduction prototype R&D ー PMTs ー small & large type summary

Calorimetry in particle physics experiments

PERFORMANCE OF THE ATLAS MUON TRIGGER IN RUN 2

Appendix A2. Particle Accelerators and Detectors The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in Geneva, Switzerland on the Border of France.

Higgs cross-sections

Heavy Hadron Production and Spectroscopy at ATLAS

Particle detection 1

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 2 Nov 2010

Polarized muon decay asymmetry measurement: status and challenges

Latest Results from the OPERA Experiment (and new Charge Reconstruction)

Correlated Background measurement in Double Chooz experiment

Status and Performance of the ATLAS Experiment

Particle Identification of the LHCb detector

ALICE Detector Status and Commissioning

PoS(NEUTEL2015)037. The NOvA Experiment. G. Pawloski University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA

Mu2e Experiment at Fermilab

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland. First Physics at CMS

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

Hadronic vs e + e - colliders

Muon commissioning and Exclusive B production at CMS with the first LHC data

Time-like Compton Scattering with transversely polarized target

Spacal alignment and calibration

on behalf of the mucool collaboration:

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 7 Sep 2016

LXe (part B) Giovanni Signorelli. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Dipartimento di Fisica and Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa (Italy)

Testing the m-e universality with ±

Fundamental Symmetries III Muons. R. Tribble Texas A&M University

UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI MILANO - BICOCCA DIPARTIMENTO DI FISICA G. OCCHIALINI CORSO DI DOTTORATO IN FISICA E ASTRONOMIA CICLO XXVII

The HARP Experiment. G. Vidal-Sitjes (INFN-Ferrara) on behalf of the HARP Collaboration

SciBar and future K2K physics. F.Sánchez Universitat Aútonoma de Barcelona Institut de Física d'altes Energies

The Electromagnetic Calorimeter of the HERA-B Experiment

Non-collision Background Monitoring Using the Semi-Conductor Tracker of ATLAS at LHC

The reaction p(e,e'p)π 0 to calibrate the Forward and the Large Angle Electromagnetic Shower Calorimeters

MiniBooNE Progress and Little Muon Counter Overview

Luminosity measurement and K-short production with first LHCb data. Sophie Redford University of Oxford for the LHCb collaboration

Future prospects for the measurement of direct photons at the LHC

PoS(FPCP2009)057. Chloé Malbrunot (for the PIENU collaboration ) University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada

Particle Detectors A brief introduction with emphasis on high energy physics applications

CMS Paper. Precise Mapping of the Magnetic Field in the CMS Barrel Yoke using Cosmic Rays. arxiv: v2 [physics.ins-det] 4 Jan 2010

Status of the LHCb Experiment. Ueli Strauman, University of Zurich, Switzerland. Sept. 13, 2001

Measurements of liquid xenon s response to low-energy particle interactions

PRELIMINARY RESULT ON DIRECT CP VIOLATION FROM NA DATA. DAPNIA-SPP / CEA-Saclay, Gif/Yvette cedex, France. Abstract

Identification of Central Production in the π + π π + π Channel at COMPASS

B and Upsilon Cross Sections at HERA-B

Publications of Francesco Arneodo: journal articles

1 Introduction. KOPIO charged-particle vetos. K - RARE Meeting (Frascati) May Purpose of CPV: veto Kl

APEX: Goals and Strategy

New Limits on Heavy Neutrino from NA62

Time-like Compton Scattering with transversely polarized target

The ultimate resolution drift chamber

Results from the OPERA experiment in the CNGS beam

Muon to Electron Conversion: Experimental Status in Japan and the US

Recent Results from Fermilab Charm Experiment E791. David A. Sanders. Representing the Fermilab Experiment E791 Collaboration

A survey of the rare pion and muon decays.

E (GMp) Precision Measurement of the Proton Elastic Cross Section at High Q 2. Thir Gautam Hampton University

Transcription:

The MEG Spectrometer at PSI Paolo Walter Cattaneo on behalf of the MEG collaboration INFN Pavia, Via Bassi 6, Pavia, I-27100, Italy arxiv:0909.0199v1 [physics.ins-det] 1 Sep 2009 The MEG experiment is designed to search the Lepton Flavor Violating process µ e + γ [1, 2]. This search requires a high intensity muon beam stopping in a thin target with the maximum rate compatible with the background from combinatorial events. The events are analyzed by a high resolution and fast liquid xenon calorimeter and by a spectrometer composed by an array of ultra-light drift chambers (DCH) for momentum measurement and a double layered timing counter (TC) for measuring the e + time. The design parameters and performance of the spectrometer during the 2008 physics run are described. Spectrometer, Rare Decay 1. Design parameters of the experiment The goal of MEG is improving the limit on BR(µ + e + γ) = 1.2 10 11 [3] by two order of magnitude to probe new physics beyond the Standard Model. The signal has a simple topology: monochromatic e + and γ with p γ = p e + = m µ /2 moving in opposite directions (cos Θ e + γ = 1), originating from the same space-time point. The physical background comes from the radiative decay µ + e + γνν with vanishing ν energy. The accidental background comes from a e + from µ + Michel decay and a γ with signal-like kinematic. The γ may originate from µ + radiative decay, from e + Bremsstrahlung or from e + annihilation In MEG the accidental background dominates. It is proportional to the instantaneous µ + rate R µ, because of coincidence within the time resolution window. The optimal beam configuration is a DC beam with R µ dependent on the detector resolution and background. The experiment is located at the Paul Scherrer Institut near Zürich, Switzerland that provides the most intense DC µ + beam in the world. The γ detection is based on homogeneous liquid xenon calorimeter. The design parameters and performances are discussed in [4]. The e + spectrometer is designed with an acceptance ǫ e + 50% and the following FWHM resolutions: time t e + = 100 ps, angular Θ e + = 10.5 mrad momentum = 0.8 % and vertex position on target v e + = 2.1 mm. p e + p e + 2. The µ + beam The µ + beam is obtained starting from a π + stopped beam. The µ + from π + decaying close to the target surface (surface muons) are monochromatic with momentum p µ + = 27.8Mev/c. They are transported through a Beam Transport Solenoid (BTS) into the MEG detector. The beam intensity is steerable up to a maximum above R µ = 1.1 10 8 µ/s. To cope with combinatorial background we use the intensity R µ = 3.0 10 7 µ/s. 3. The e + spectrometer The approach of the MEG spectrometer in satisfying the above design parameters in presence of high e + rate consists in developing a particular configuration of the magnetic field to sweep out quickly e + preventing excessive hit crowding in DCH and in minimizing material on e + path to reduce multiple scattering. The whole spectrometer is embedded in He gas. A display of the spectrometer with a signal event is shown in Fig1a. 3.1. The COBRA magnet The COnstant Bending RAdius magnet is a thin superconducting magnet with an axial gradient and a central value B = 1.26 T. This configuration has two advantages: the maximum radius of a e + trajectory depends mainly on its total and not on its transverse momentum, therefore almost independent from its polar angle, and the e + emitted at normal polar angle are swept away in a few turns. Email address: Paolo.Cattaneo@pv.infn.it (Paolo Walter Cattaneo on behalf of the MEG collaboration ) Preprint submitted to TIPP09 Proceedings in NIMA February 19, 2013

3.2. The target The target is made of polyethylene 205 µm thick with an ellipsoidal shape. It is located at COBRA center tilted at 20.5 with the beam axis. Holes with 0.5 cm diameter are drilled in the target for easing alignment. This configuration guarantees that e + emitted in the spectrometer acceptance suffer low multiple scattering while the fraction of µ + not stopping in the target is minimized: in fact 70 % of the µ + entering the BTS decay in the target. 3.3. The Drift Chamber The e + momentum is measured with a set of 16 low mass Drift Chambers. They are positioned at fixed φ with wires along z (beam direction). Design and construction details are presented in [5]. The chamber measures the e + momentum and kinematic parameters. The measured tracks are extrapolated to match TC hit where their timing is precisely measured and to the target to define the event vertex. Problems with HV trips reduced significantly the DCH efficiency during the 2008 run and worsened the momentum resolution compared to the design values. Chamber are being redesigned to remove this problem. 3.4. The Timing Counter The timing counter (TC) is designed to provide trigger information on the momentum, relative direction and time of the e +. It is divided in two sectors, upstream and downstream the target. Each sector consists of an inner layer made of 0.5 cm thick scintillating fibers read by APD and an outer layer made of 4 cm thick scintillating bars read by PMT insensitive to the magnetic field along their axis. The PMT output is sampled at 2GHz with a custom designed chip [6, 7] for offline timing reconstruction. The same chip is used for sampling the output of the liquid xenon calorimeter that measured the γ time. The inner layer measures the z coordinate while the outer one the φ coordinate and the time. The TC timing resolution is obtained studying events with multiple bar hits. The result of σ(t e +) = 54 ps is very close to the design value σ(t e +) = 45 ps. 3.5. The Time Calibrations The TC tight timing requirements need a time intercalibration between bars and with the calorimeter. t e + is measured on the bars and extrapolated to the vertex on the target using the track parameters measured with the DCH. t γ is measured on the inner surface of the calorimeter and extrapolated to the target. t e + and t γ extrapolated to the target are required to match within the experimental resolution. Each PMT on each bar sides provides a separate and independent measurement of time, related to the e + impact time on the n-th bar t e + from 2 T n PMT0 = t e + + z v eff + b n 0 T n PMT1 = t e + + L z v eff + b n 1 where PMT0 is on the inner side and PMT1 on the outer one. z is the coordinate along the bar, v eff the effective velocity and b n 01 the PMT offsets. For cosmic rays, that hit the bars uniformly in z, the distribution of T n = TPMT1 n T PMT1 n is centered at b n 1 bn 0, so that bn 1 are measured. Besides Michel e + and cosmic rays, that are available with the default setup, we designed two other calibration approaches. In the former, a custom designed Cockroft-Walton accelerator feeding a proton beam with E p 1 MeV onto a target containing Boron. The reaction B(p, γγ)c delivers two simultaneous γ with Eγ 1 = 4.4 MeV and Eγ 2 = 11.7 MeV. The γs are detected in the TC and in the calorimeter providing a tool for bar intercalibration. Another approach consists in delivering a π + beam on the target to produce π 0 through charge exchange process. The Dalitz decay π 0 γe + e provides γ-e + pairs generated from the same 4d vertex. Using t γ as reference, the relative interbar offsets are calculated. The calorimeter- TC offset is also obtained with the same method. The result of the interbar calibration at different times in Fig.2a shows that the offsets are remarkably stable. 4. The DCH-TC matching A measurement of e + requires both the DCH for the kinematic parameters and the TC for the time. The DCH track is extrapolated to the TC surface and matched with a TC hit, that provides information about φ from the bar position, z from the fiber position and from T n PMT0 T n PMT1. In Fig.2b the DCH-TC match in z is shown with a resolution 4 cm. 5. Radiative Decay detection One of the most critical tests of the feasibility of the experiment is its capability of detecting e + γ pairs emitted from the same space-time point, distinguishing them from the combinatorial background. These pairs are generated from µ + Radiative Decays with a known Branching Ratio and its detection is a proof of the good time resolution of the spectrometer. In Fig.1b the Radiative Decay peak is clearly visible above the background. 6. Conclusions The MEG spectrometer was commissioned during 2008. A hardware problem with the DCH limited its efficiency and momentum resolution. Nevertheless several aspects of the spectrometer functionality were successfully tested. The detection of RD events demonstrates the functionality of the apparatus.

EVENT 3 y x (a) Simulated µ eγ event (b) Radiative Decay peak Figure 1: Tγγ [ns] Sep 08/10 13/10 20/10 25/10 10/11 24/11 01/12 relative to bar 17 (a) Interbar offset calibration (b) DCH Track match with TC hit Figure 2: [1] MEG Collaboration T. Mori et al, Research Proposal to PSI R-99-05, 1999 [2] A. Baldini, Status of the MEG experiment, Nuclear Physics B, Proceeding Supplement 168 (2007) 334 [3] W. Yao et al., Review of Particle Physics, Journal of Physics G 33 (2006) 1 [4] R. Sawada, Performance of liquid xenon gamma ray detector for MEG, This proceedings (2009) [5] M.P. Hildebrand, The drift chamber system of the MEG experiment, This proceedings (2009) [6] S. Ritt, Design and Performance of the of the 5 GHz Waveform Digitizing Chip DRS3, IEEE TNS, 4 (2007) 2485 [7] S. Ritt, Design and Performance of the of the 6 GHz Waveform Digitizing Chip DRS4, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (2008) 3

arxiv:0909.0199v1 [physics.ins-det] 1 Sep 2009 1. [1] Preprint submitted to Nuclear Physics B February 19, 2013

arxiv:0909.0199v1 [physics.ins-det] 1 Sep 2009 1. [1] Preprint submitted to Nuclear Physics B February 19, 2013