LHC Detectors and their Physics Potential. Nick Ellis PH Department, CERN, Geneva

Similar documents
LHC State of the Art and News

(a) (b) Fig. 1 - The LEP/LHC tunnel map and (b) the CERN accelerator system.

The achievements of the CERN proton antiproton collider

7 Physics at Hadron Colliders

Last Friday: pp(bar) Physics Intro, the TeVatron

Particle Physics Columbia Science Honors Program

Risultati dell esperimento ATLAS dopo il run 1 di LHC. C. Gemme (INFN Genova), F. Parodi (INFN/University Genova) Genova, 28 Maggio 2013

2 ATLAS operations and data taking

The ATLAS Detector - Inside Out Julia I. Hofmann

Modern Accelerators for High Energy Physics

The Particle World. This talk: What is our Universe made of? Where does it come from? Why does it behave the way it does?

Future prospects for the measurement of direct photons at the LHC

Identifying Particle Trajectories in CMS using the Long Barrel Geometry

Lecture 2 & 3. Particles going through matter. Collider Detectors. PDG chapter 27 Kleinknecht chapters: PDG chapter 28 Kleinknecht chapters:

The Collider Detector at Fermilab. Amitabh Lath Rutgers University July 25, 2002

A brief history of accelerators, detectors and experiments: (See Chapter 14 and Appendix H in Rolnick.)

Theory English (Official)

Introduction of CMS Detector. Ijaz Ahmed National Centre for Physics, Islamabad

Physics at Hadron Colliders

Early physics with the LHCb detector

Physics at Accelerators

Recent Results from 7 GeV proton proton running at CMS

Performance of muon and tau identification at ATLAS

Particle detection 1

Large Hadron Collider at CERN

LHC & ATLAS. The largest particle physics experiment in the world. Vincent Hedberg - Lund University 1

Reconstruction in Collider Experiments (Part IX)

Hadronic vs e + e - colliders

Recent CMS results on heavy quarks and hadrons. Alice Bean Univ. of Kansas for the CMS Collaboration

Discovery potential of the SM Higgs with ATLAS

LHC detectors: commissioning and early physics

Analyses with photons or electrons with early LHC data at the CMS experiment

CMS Conference Report

Tracking at the LHC. Pippa Wells, CERN

AIM AIM. Study of Rare Interactions. Discovery of New High Mass Particles. Energy 500GeV High precision Lots of events (high luminosity) Requirements

Flavour Physics at LHC

Modern experiments - ATLAS

Tutorial on Top-Quark Physics

Accelerators. Acceleration mechanism always electromagnetic Start with what s available: e - or p Significant differences between accelerators of

Muon reconstruction performance in ATLAS at Run-2

The ATLAS Detector at the LHC

Year- 1 (Heavy- Ion) Physics with CMS at the LHC

Introduction to the Standard Model

etectors for High Energy Physics

Validation of Geant4 Physics Models Using Collision Data from the LHC

The ATLAS C. Gemme, F.Parodi

17/01/17 F. Ould-Saada

V 0 production studies at LHCb. Mathias Knecht, EPFL , joint SPS-ÖPG-ÖGA 2 meeting, Innsbrück, Österreich, September 2-4, 2009

Fall Quarter 2010 UCSB Physics 225A & UCSD Physics 214 Homework 1

R-hadrons and Highly Ionising Particles: Searches and Prospects

Accelerators and Colliders

The Discovery of the Higgs Boson: one step closer to understanding the beginning of the Universe

Discovery of the W and Z 0 Bosons

The God particle at last? Astronomy Ireland, Oct 8 th, 2012

Upgrade of ATLAS and CMS for High Luminosity LHC: Detector performance and Physics potential

Early physics with Atlas at LHC

Observation of a New Particle with a Mass of 125 GeV

Particles and Universe: Particle detectors

The Quark-Gluon Plasma and the ALICE Experiment

Electromagnetic Calorimeter Calibration: Getting Rid of the Trash

Results and Prospects for Ion Physics at LHCb

Introduction to CERN and CMS

Searches for exotic particles in the dilepton and lepton plus missing transverse energy final states with ATLAS

FYST17 Lecture 6 LHC Physics II

Elementary Particle Physics Glossary. Course organiser: Dr Marcella Bona February 9, 2016

Particle Physics Design Group Studies Worksheet. Particle Physics Experiments: Colliders vs Fixed Targets

PERFORMANCE OF THE ATLAS MUON TRIGGER IN RUN 2

Particle Identification: Computer reconstruction of a UA1 event with an identified electron as a candidate for a W >eν event

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 6 Jul 2007

Tau Lepton Reconstruction in ATLAS. Tau 2016 Conference, Beijing, 21st September 2016

Studies of top pair production in the fully hadronic channel at LHC with CMS

FYST17 Lecture 6 LHC Physics II

PoS(HCP2009)042. Status of the ALICE Experiment. Werner Riegler. For the ALICE Collaboration. CERN

Decay rates and Cross section. Ashfaq Ahmad National Centre for Physics

Collider physics. Introduction Some e + e - collider physics. Hadronic machines. R(e + e - hadrons/ e + e - µ - µ + ) Z 0 and W at LEP

Some studies for ALICE

V0 cross-section measurement at LHCb. RIVET analysis module for Z boson decay to di-electron

The ATLAS Experiment and the CERN Large Hadron Collider

Invariant Mass, Missing Mass, jet reconstruction and jet flavour tagging

Discovery Physics at the Large Hadron Collider

Dean Karlen University of Victoria & TRIUMF. APS NW Section Meeting 2005 Victoria, Canada

e + e - (1) Silicon Vertex Detector

Particle accelerators

The LHCb Flavour Physics Experiment

Searches for new Physics at HERA

Experimental Particle Physics Informal Lecture & Seminar Series Lecture 1 Detectors Overview

14 Top Quark. Completing the Third Generation

Flavour physics in the LHC era

Optimizing Selection and Sensitivity Results for VV->lvqq, 6.5 pb -1, 13 TeV Data

The God particle at last? Science Week, Nov 15 th, 2012

Measurement of jet production in association with a Z boson at the LHC & Jet energy correction & calibration at HLT in CMS

LHCb: From the detector to the first physics results

La ricerca dell Higgs Standard Model a CDF

Searches for long-lived particles at CMS

Particles and Universe: Particle detectors

Search for a Z at an e + e - Collider Thomas Walker

Reconstruction and identification of hadronic τ decays with ATLAS

Measurement of the mass of the W boson at DØ

Unravelling the Mysteries of Matter with the CERN Large Hadron Collider An Introduction/Overview of Particle Physics

Heavy Ions at the LHC: Selected Predictions. Georg Wolschin. Institut für Theoretische Physik der Universität, Heidelberg, Germany

Transcription:

LHC Detectors and their Physics Potential Nick Ellis PH Department, CERN, Geneva 1

Part 1 Introduction to the LHC Detector Requirements & Design Concepts 2

What is the Large Hadron Collider? Circular proton-proton collider under construction at CERN Collide counter-rotating beams of protons head-on Centre-of-mass energy s = 2 E beam 2 p beam Compare to fixed-target s (2 m E beam ) m 1 GeV for proton target Will also operate some of the time with heavy-ion beams e.g. Pb-Pb collisions First proton-proton collisions expected in Summer 2007 3

Energy and intensity Want very high energy and very high intensity to maximize the sensitivity to new physics Energy needed to produce new massive particles such as the Higgs boson Intensity needed because some of the processes that one would like to study are very rare (e.g. small σ.b for decay modes visible above background) 4

LHC uses existing CERN complex LHC is being built in the existing tunnel previously used for LEP Circumference = 27 km Radius = 4.3 km Use existing accelerators as injection system Four major experiments ATLAS and CMS are generalpurpose detectors optimised for exploring new physics in pp collisions LHCb is a specialized detector optimised for B-physics studies ALICE is a specialized detector optimised for heavy-ion physics 5

Path of the CERN LEP/LHC tunnel Airport Circumference of ring ~ 27 km 6

Illustration with ATLAS detector 7

Beam Energy Energy of protons is limited by the magnets that guide the beams on circular path Beam energy momentum: p = 0.3 B r p = momentum [GeV], B = magnetic field [Tesla], r = radius [metres] Since the radius of the ring is fixed, one has to use very highfield magnets to reach high energy... and fill as large a fraction as possible of the circumference with magnets Achieve ~ 2/3 of ring with dipole magnets Need other magnets for focusing, etc Need straight sections for acceleration, detectors Also require space for beam injection and ejection systems 8

Need very high-field two-in-one magnets Use 15-meter long superconducting magnet coils cooled to 1.9 K with super-fluid Helium Field > 8 Tesla Compared to 4 5 Tesla at Tevatron and HERA Since LHC collides beams of protons (not proton-antiproton as at Tevatron), one needs double magnets Note: Use two proton beams because antiprotons cannot be produced, accumulated and cooled in sufficient numbers to reach desired beam intensity 9

10

11

Luminosity Want highest luminosity possible: Rate σ L Access to rare (i.e. low cross-section) processes Beam parameters at LHC N 1011 ; σ 15 µm in ATLAS and CMS; f = 11 khz; k = 2808 12

Some LHC parameters Centre-of-mass energy s = 14 TeV for proton-proton collisions c.f. 2 TeV at Tevatron collider Equivalent to ~100,000 TeV or 10 17 ev fixed-target beam energy s = 6 TeV per nucleon for Pb-Pb collisions Luminosity L = 10 34 cm -2 s -1 for proton-proton collisions in ATLAS and CMS c.f. L = 10 32 cm -2 s -1 at Tevatron L = 10 27 cm -2 s -1 for Pb-Pb collisions (in ALICE and also ATLAS+CMS) Note: enormous energy stored in proton beams 331 MJ/beam (enough to melt 500 kg of copper)! Rely on safe ejection of beams into beam dumps at end of coast Most of the protons used up in beam-beam collisions in experimental areas 13

More LHC parameters Protons circulate in bunches (i.e. not continuous beam) Bunch spacing is 25 ns in time (i.e. 7.5 meters in distance) Bunch-crossing rate is 40 MHz Total proton-proton cross-section σ ~ 100 mb Interaction rate at L = 10 34 cm -2 s -1 is R ~ 10 9 Hz On average ~ 25 interactions per bunch crossing Background activity that complicates analysis of what happened in the interaction of interest LHCb uses L = 2 10 32 cm -2 s -1 to maximize rate of single-interaction bunch crossings Different focussing of beams to ATLAS and CMS Rate much lower for heavy-ion case R ~ 10 4 Hz for Pb-Pb (low luminosity) Much less than bunch-crossing rate (BC period = 125 ns for Pb ions) 14

Luminosity for LHCb L = 2 1032 cm-2s-1 LHCb can operate concurrently with ATLAS and CMS Different optics less focussed beams larger σ 15

Illustration with CMS detector 16

Multiple interactions per BC = pile-up Has strong impact on detector designs Exposure time of one BC (25 ns) Need detectors with fast time response ~ exposure time Pile up in a single bunch crossing already presents a challenge! Except in the case of ALICE where the rate of heavy-ion collisions is much less than the bunch-crossing frequency Need fine detector granularity to be able to reconstruct the event Minimize the probability of pileup in the same detector element as an interesting object E.g. probability for energy from the pile-up interactions being deposited in the calorimeter cell hit by a photon in an H γγ decay 17

Physics Objectives (ATLAS and CMS) (see lectures of Michelangelo) Search for and study of new physics in ATLAS and CMS Origin of electro-weak symmetry breaking (m W and m Z ) SUSY Higgs boson (or bosons) Alternative schemes squark and gluinos have large cross sections Compositeness Leptoquarks W and Z Extra dimensions KK excitations, black holes The unpredicted! Very important to be open to this in our event selection and analysis LHC has an order of magnitude more centre-of-mass energy and two orders of magnitude more luminosity compared to today s most powerful machine 18

Physics Objectives (ATLAS and CMS) Standard Model production processes W, Z, direct-photon production Jet production (including multi-jet production) Interesting in their own right Must be understood as backgrounds to new physics Can be done with comparatively very little integrated luminosity It will take some time before the LHC is tuned to reach its full luminosity Precision measurements W mass and top mass Important for consistency checks with Higgs studies 19

Physics Objectives (ALICE) Heavy-ion programme Heavy-ion collisions will produce extremely high energy density Search for evidence of quarkgluon plasma using simultaneous signatures ALICE experiment is dedicated to this activity ATLAS and CMS will also contribute in a few areas M 2 (GeV 2 ) 10 8 10 6 10 4 10 2 10 0 10-6 10-4 10-2 10 0 x 20

Physics Objectives (LHCb) LHCb aims to perform a broad programme of B-physics studies ATLAS and CMS will also contribute significantly in some areas, although this is not their top priority and the detectors are not optimised for these studies CP violation in many channels with very high statistics Extend precision beyond e + e - B factories Including B s decays B s mesons Precise measurement of oscillation period and lifetime difference between mass eigenstates Measurements of rare decays Provide indirect tests on physics beyond the Standard Model 21

What do we actually measure? The detectors give information on comparatively long-lived particles that are generally the decay products of the fundamental objects that we wish to study We do not directly see : Up, down, charm, strange and beauty quarks, and gluons (that manifest themselves as jets of hadrons) Top quarks that decay rapidly (e.g. t bw) W and Z bosons that decay rapidly to quarks or leptons Higgs bosons Etc We do see somewhat more directly: Electrons Muons Photons Long-lived charged and neutral hadrons (which may form jets) Missing transverse momentum (e.g. due to high transverse momentum neutrinos) 22

Generic concept of detector Collisions take place in centre of detector Collision products move outwards from the centre Trajectories of charged particles are measured Solenoid magnetic field, so particles follow helical paths p = 0.3 B r Q used to determine momentum from radius of curvature (assuming charge Q = 1) Calorimeters measure energy deposited by electrons, photons, and hadrons Calorimeters are sufficiently thick that almost all energy is absorbed, apart from muons (only minimally ionising) and neutrinos [and possibly other particles beyond those of the Standard Model] Trajectories of remaining charged particles (= muons) are measured Provides muon identification and additional information on momentum 23

24

Generic detector (simplified) IDET ECAL HCAL MuDET e γ µ ν jet 25

Additional information The inner tracking detectors may provide additional information for particle identification Hadron identification by Cerenkov or time-of-flight techniques Important in LHCb, e.g. for K/π separation in B decays Important in ALICE, e.g. for strangeness-enhancement studies Electron identification via transition-radiation signature Used in ATLAS to enhance purity of electron selection Particle identification from ionisation (de/dx) measurements Reconstructed tracks can be extrapolated to search for primary and secondary vertices Determine time of decay of short-lived particles Important for B-physics studies (e.g. time-dependent CP violation) Separate b-quark jets from light-quark and gluon jets Important in top and Higgs physics studies 26

Particle identification: Time of Flight Charged particles can be identified from their mass that can be determined by measuring their velocity in addition to their momentum A rather direct way to measure velocity is to measure the time taken by the particles to move between two points E.g. multi-gap RPC detectors IP Technique used in ALICE 27

Particle identification: Cerenkov light Charged particles that traverse a medium with a velocity higher than the speed of light in that medium radiate Cerenkov light Determine velocity from Cerenkov angle Technique used in ALICE and in LHCb 28

Particle identification: Transition Radiation When an ultra-relativistic charged particle (i.e. electron with βγ > 1000) traverses boundaries between materials of different refractive indices, they emit transition radiation The TR X-rays can be detected and used to identify electrons This technique is used in ALICE and ATLAS 29

Particle identification: de/dx 30

Definition of term event In high-energy particle colliders (Tevatron, HERA, LEP, LHC), the particles in the counter-rotating beams are bunched Bunches cross at regular intervals Interactions only occur during the bunch-crossings The trigger (an on-line system of electronics and computers see later) has the job of selecting the bunch-crossings potentially of interest for physics analysis, i.e. those containing interactions of interest I will use the term event to refer to the record of all the products of a given bunch-crossing (plus any activity from other bunch-crossings that gets recorded along with this) Be aware (beware!): the term event is not uniquely defined! Some people use the term event for the products of a single interaction between the incident particles People sometimes unwittingly use event interchangeably to mean different things! 31

Transverse momentum and pseudo-rapidity Very often use transverse momentum (p T ) and pseudo-rapidity (η) as variables in hadron-collider physics p T is momentum transverse to the beam direction Not same definition as in e + e - experiments η -ln(tan(θ/2)) y ½ln((E+p z )/(E-p z )) In central region, hadron η distribution is approximately flat at fixed p T Considering particle distribution in polar angle θ, there is a high concentration of high-momentum (but low-p T ) particles at small angles relative to the two proton beams The high flux of particles originating from proton-proton collisions creates a challenging radiation environment for detectors and electronics Radiation-resistant detectors Radiation-hard (or tolerant) electronics Need to consider noise signals induced in detectors by the radiation as well as conventional noise signals 32

How do we reconstruct an event... Start with signals seen in the detectors Points in space along charged particle trajectories Energies measured in calorimeter cells Signals from particle-identification detectors Reconstruct quantities more closely related to particles Parametrize trajectory of charged-particle tracks in the inner tracking detectors and in the external muon detectors Position and direction at some start point ; radius of curvature Infer charge sign and momentum (assuming Q = 1) Parametrize energy deposits in the calorimeters in terms of clusters Energy Longitudinal and lateral shape Can (e.g.) test consistency with shower from isolated electron or photon Direction of energy flow 33

Generic detector (simplified) IDET ECAL HCAL MuDET e γ µ ν jet 34

Reconstruction of muons Combine information from muon detection system and the inner tracking detectors to get information on muon candidates Muon charge sign and momentum vector at a given point in space Know with some confidence that this is really a muon, but there are backgrounds at some level E.g. decays in flight of charged pions and kaons (π µν, K µν) Small probability to match the wrong inner-detector track to the muonspectrometer track Very small probability for fake muonspectrometer tracks due to spurious hits 35

Reconstruction of electrons and photons Reconstruct electrons and photons Combine information from the calorimeters and the inner tracking detectors Electrons and photons identified as narrow clusters in electromagnetic calorimeters Electrons have associated track; can check consistency of parameters between cluster and track (p / E, impact point / cluster centre, etc.) Photons have no associated track For many interesting processes, the electrons and photons are isolated, whereas the candidates are often in jets for background processes Genuine electrons from charm and beauty decays Photons from π 0 decays (which may convert to given electrons) Misidentified hadrons Background comes from misidentified jets (dominant high-p T process) Also electrons may be misidentified as photons and vice versa 36

Reconstruction of jets Jets are the dominant high-p T process at LHC Interesting in their own right Important source of background when searching for other physics processes Reconstruction is rather straightforward in principle Comparatively broad clusters of energy in the calorimeters Associated tracks in the inner detectors for the charged hadrons Very high rate of jets extending to extremely large transverse momentum Inclusive jets 37

Features that distinguish interesting processes from pile-up and background Most of the particles from random ( minimum-bias ) protonproton interactions are low-p T hadrons Applying a cut on the reconstructed tracks / clusters of p T ~ 2 GeV eliminates almost all of the activity Concentrating on electrons, muons and photons gives particularly clean signatures for extracting physics signals Requiring isolation reduces the background from hadronic jets Missing transverse energy (i.e. momentum imbalance in the transverse plane) is also a very powerful signature Extensive studies of the physics potential of the experiments have demonstrated that in many cases the most important remaining backgrounds to new physics will involve events with genuine W or Z bosons, or top quarks 38

Exposure time of one BC (25 ns) Muons coloured in yellow 39