New average divisional daily temperature normals, shown in Table 2, range. Lawrence A. Schaal

Similar documents
LOCAL CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA FOR FREEPORT ILLINOIS

Seasonal and Spatial Patterns of Rainfall Trends on the Canadian Prairie

Analysis of Rainfall and Other Weather Parameters under Climatic Variability of Parbhani ( )

Local Ctimatotogical Data Summary White Hall, Illinois

January 25, Summary

Illinois Drought Update, December 1, 2005 DROUGHT RESPONSE TASK FORCE Illinois State Water Survey, Department of Natural Resources

Meteorology. Circle the letter that corresponds to the correct answer

J8.4 TRENDS OF U.S. SNOWFALL AND SNOW COVER IN A WARMING WORLD,

November 2018 Weather Summary West Central Research and Outreach Center Morris, MN

Champaign-Urbana 1998 Annual Weather Summary

South & South East Asian Region:

ESTIMATING TEMPERATURE NORMALS FOR USCRN STATIONS

Climate Change Impact on Air Temperature, Daily Temperature Range, Growing Degree Days, and Spring and Fall Frost Dates In Nebraska

South & South East Asian Region:

The Climate of Texas County

Bugs in JRA-55 snow depth analysis

NWS FORM E-5 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE I HYDRO SERVICE AREA NOAA, NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE I Indianapolis, IN MONTHLY REPORT

Monthly Long Range Weather Commentary Issued: February 15, 2015 Steven A. Root, CCM, President/CEO

Champaign-Urbana 2000 Annual Weather Summary

Chiang Rai Province CC Threat overview AAS1109 Mekong ARCC

The Climate of Payne County

Range Cattle Research and Education Center January CLIMATOLOGICAL REPORT 2012 Range Cattle Research and Education Center.

The Palfai Drought Index (PaDI) Expansion of applicability of Hungarian PAI for South East Europe (SEE) region Summary

The Climate of Murray County

The following information is provided for your use in describing climate and water supply conditions in the West as of April 1, 2003.

The weather in Iceland 2012

UPPLEMENT A COMPARISON OF THE EARLY TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY DROUGHT IN THE UNITED STATES TO THE 1930S AND 1950S DROUGHT EPISODES

Range Cattle Research and Education Center January CLIMATOLOGICAL REPORT 2016 Range Cattle Research and Education Center.

SEPTEMBER 2013 REVIEW

Sierra Weather and Climate Update

DROUGHT IN MAINLAND PORTUGAL

The Climate of Kiowa County

January 2008 Climate Summary

September 2018 Weather Summary West Central Research and Outreach Center Morris, MN

The Pennsylvania Observer

Minnesota s Climatic Conditions, Outlook, and Impacts on Agriculture. Today. 1. The weather and climate of 2017 to date

The Climate of Haskell County

A Report on a Statistical Model to Forecast Seasonal Inflows to Cowichan Lake

Dust Storm: An Extreme Climate Event in China

Midwest/Great Plains Climate-Drought Outlook September 20, 2018

PAKISTAN. WINTER RAINFALL PREDICTION Hazrat Mir. Cief Met Pakistan Meteorological Department 14 th, October2015

The Climate of Marshall County

Champaign-Urbana 1999 Annual Weather Summary

ONE-YEAR EXPERIMENT IN NUMERICAL PREDICTION OF MONTHLY MEAN TEMPERATURE IN THE ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN-CONTINENT SYSTEM

Climate. Annual Temperature (Last 30 Years) January Temperature. July Temperature. Average Precipitation (Last 30 Years)

Local Climatological Data Summary Sparta, Illinois

Variability of Reference Evapotranspiration Across Nebraska

Analysis of meteorological measurements made over three rainy seasons in Sinazongwe District, Zambia.

Drought History. for the Edwards Plateau of Texas. Prepared by the South Central Climate Science Center in Norman, Oklahoma

The Climate of Seminole County

New Zealand Climate Update No 223, January 2018 Current climate December 2017

Prediction of Snow Water Equivalent in the Snake River Basin

2012 Growing Season Weather Summary for North Dakota. Adnan Akyüz and Barbara A. Mullins Department of Soil Science October 30, 2012

Drought in Southeast Colorado

Rainfall variation and frequency analysis study of Salem district Tamil Nadu

CLIMATOLOGICAL REPORT 2002

The Climate of Bryan County

The Climate of Grady County

The Pennsylvania Observer

Champaign-Urbana 2001 Annual Weather Summary

The Relationship between Vegetation Changes and Cut-offs in the Lower Yellow River Based on Satellite and Ground Data

2015: A YEAR IN REVIEW F.S. ANSLOW

The Climate of Pontotoc County

Monthly Long Range Weather Commentary Issued: NOVEMBER 16, 2015 Steven A. Root, CCM, Chief Analytics Officer, Sr. VP, sales

Monthly Long Range Weather Commentary Issued: APRIL 1, 2015 Steven A. Root, CCM, President/CEO

State Water Survey Division

Description of the Temperature Observation and Averaging Methods Used at the Blue Hill Meteorological Observatory

Drought History. for the Low Rolling Plains of Texas. Prepared by the South Central Climate Science Center in Norman, Oklahoma

Highlights of the 2006 Water Year in Colorado

Observed and Predicted Daily Wind Travels and Wind Speeds in Western Iraq

Analysis of Relative Humidity in Iraq for the Period

2011 Year in Review TORNADOES

UNITED STATES AND SOUTH AMERICA SNAPSHOT REPORT Thursday, December 21, 2017

ANNUAL CLIMATE REPORT 2016 SRI LANKA

Weather and Climate Summary and Forecast Winter

Drought History. for Southeast Oklahoma. Prepared by the South Central Climate Science Center in Norman, Oklahoma

Arizona Climate Summary April 2018 Summary of conditions for March 2018

Changing Hydrology under a Changing Climate for a Coastal Plain Watershed

U.S. Outlook For October and Winter Thursday, September 19, 2013

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OKLAHOMA'S PRECIPITATION REGIME FOR TWO EXTENDED TIME PERIODS BY USE OF EIGENVECTORS

KANSAS CLIMATE SUMMARY January 2018

NIDIS Intermountain West Regional Drought Early Warning System February 7, 2017

An Spatial Analysis of Insolation in Iran: Applying the Interpolation Methods

2006 Drought in the Netherlands (20 July 2006)

Monthly Long Range Weather Commentary Issued: May 15, 2014 Steven A. Root, CCM, President/CEO

Great Lakes Update. Volume 188: 2012 Annual Summary

Climate of Columbus. Aaron Wilson. Byrd Polar & Climate Research Center State Climate Office of Ohio.

Current Climate Trends and Implications

What Is the Weather Like in Different Regions of the United States?

Here s what a weak El Nino usually brings to the nation with temperatures:

Seasonal Climate Outlook for South Asia (June to September) Issued in May 2014

Water Balance in the Murray-Darling Basin and the recent drought as modelled with WRF

2003 Water Year Wrap-Up and Look Ahead

Chill Hour Assessment for the Yuma Area

Colorado s 2003 Moisture Outlook

Study of Hydrometeorology in a Hard Rock Terrain, Kadirischist Belt Area, Anantapur District, Andhra Pradesh

KANSAS CLIMATE SUMMARY August 2015

Arizona Climate Summary May 2018 Summary of conditions for April 2018

Seasonal Climate Watch September 2018 to January 2019

Study of Changes in Climate Parameters at Regional Level: Indian Scenarios

Transcription:

The New Decade and Changing Normals of Temperature and Precipitation in Indiana Lawrence A. Schaal Department of Agronomy Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907 Introduction "Normals" of temperature and precipitation, as well as their estimates, are ever changing to the disappointment of many who presume them to be climatological bench marks in meteorology. Reference to departures from normal regularly used by the news media, the heating and cooling industry, and by agriculturalists assume a semi-permanent fixed average, called the normal. Most countries adhere to the World Meteorological Organization definition of a temperature or precipitation normal as a 30-year average ending with the last complete decade. Continous constant quality exposure of instruments at one location is required to prepare station normals. For climatological division or district normals, it is also assumed that the network or location of stations within the division, has not changed significantly. Temperature and precipitation normals are calculated at the end of each decade for the preceeding 30-years and used as normals for the next ten years. What happens when the records of the 1970s replace those of the 1940s? The answer is the subject of this paper. Data and Procedures The easiest way to appraise the new normals is to consolidate the 1951-80 station averages into a revised area or division normal. A preliminary listing of the new station normals calculated by the National Climatic Center were used. Indiana is divided into nine climatic divisions as outlined in Figure 1. These division boundaries have been used in Climatological Data, Indiana (U.S.D.C, 1956-80) and other climatological publications since October 1956. They are also the same as the Crop Reporting Districts used by the U.S. Department of Agriculture in summarizing crop and livestock statistics. Results and Discussion Precipitation Normals of total annual precipitation, average of 1951-1980, have undergone very little change from those of 1941-70, used in the 1970s, and even from those of 1931-60. The new normals to be used in the 1980s are given in Table 1. There are distribution changes within the year, however. In January in the southwest division precipitation totals decreased from 3.90 inches in 1931-60, to 3.28 in 1941-70, and 2.87 for the new normals. This winter decrease is offset by an increase in July, from 3.56 in the 1931-60 period, 4.32 in the 1951-80 period. The change is less in the other divisions. If true, this has important agricultural significance in Indiana. The state usually has an excess of winter precipitation and almost always has less precipitation than required in the summer. The southwest division has the greatest evaporation and has the highest drought probabilities. Temperatures New average divisional daily temperature normals, shown in Table 2, range from 23.0 F. in January in northwest Indiana to 30.2 F. in the southwest. The range in July is much less, from 73.1 F. in north central to 77.4 in southwest. Daily 577

578 Indiana Academy of Science INDIANA <sn^. \ CENTRAL x * J NORTHEAST NORTHWEST * X r.j i I j CENTR/ r WEST CENTRAL EAST CENTRAL ' % L. Figure 1. Temperature stations included in calculation of division normals. Deletions (X) and additions (0) from 1931-1960 to 1951-1980 normals.

Soil and Atmospheric Sciences 579 <3> -H CO -3 1 t- CO CO CO CO CO CO 05mcocoLOc~«oa>-«3> c>ji>jc>j(n(n"ejcococo (M Cv) W CO CO CO LOCDt OOOi'S'LOCxI (NNdwricinmin LO O LO CD O LO CO CO NNNNNNNNN CO 05 O CO LO CD ^COCO-^-^OJt^LOLO lololololololololo ioi-<^<n<caioom CNJCDOqcDOSLOCOCDOq lo^^idio'^oit-t- CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD cocococococococo h in n oo o "S" CO t- LO LO i-hnt-i-hc-lrtnnc- CO -tf "* "* CO >* ^ CO CD 00 CD CD CD C- t CD t tr~ n o) io a h m o rt >* m <m o t oo O Ol CD Oi Oi G) 01 ^f CO CO CO CO CO CO *finm<*u5iom CO CO c~ C- CO 0O H N OOON^OlOOt-ON t~ CO <M (M CO CO CO CO CO CO ^Hi-H.-l!Nl<M<N]C\>C\)CNI c~cdc-'oiadc-,q'c\icxi LO CDO>00t>t-<* N N N N N N W «q^010<dnnn^ mri'jioio'j'doioi NNCgNNNraNIN 8 Z Z Z ^ O H Z Z Z O W

580 Indiana Academy of Science mean temperatures are the averages of the daily maximum temperatures of Table 3, and daily minimum temperatures of Table 4. A comparison of the new temperatures normals with those used the past ten years shows some very interesting changes. In Figure 2, the divisional temperature normals for 1951-80 and 1931-60 are shown as departures from the 1941-70 normals. For Central Indiana the departures are also shown for the 1931-50 normals. For practically all months and divisions lower temperatures are indicated by the 1951-80 normals. Those for January and February are the most drastic. No doubt the severe winters of 1977, 1978 and 1979 contributed greatly to reducing the average. The second dominant feature in Figure 2 is the minimal change during November and December in the western and northern divisions. Sources of "Non-climatic" Trend The configuration of climatological stations used to compute a divisional average changes from one decade to another. This introduces bias into the estimates of the "normal" climate. One source of bias concerns the rule that a station must operate continuously for 30 years or more. Otherwise, it is dropped from the group being used for determining the divisional average. On the other hand, stations newly attaining a record length of three decades enter the averaging process. With a north to south temperature and precipitation gradient existing there may be some increase in temperature and precipitation shown by the divisional average if there is a relative increase in stations in the southern part of the division. The opposite is true if there are relative additions of stations in the north. Changes in network configuration of stations used for the normals in 1951-80 from that in 1931-60 are shown in Figure 1. Another bias that climatologists, working with once daily observations of INDIANA DIVISIONAL TEMPERATURE NORMALS NC < 1 ^\7^ g -2 5 + 2 % "2 CL +2 UJ 0L JFMAMJJASOND JFMAMJJASOND JFMAMJJASOND MONTH Figure 2. New normals of temperature ( ) shown as departures from base line 1941-1970, departures for 1931-1960 (--), and for central Indiana, 1921-1950 (+ + +).

Soil and Atmospheric Sciences 581 O O O CM 05 O Tf CM h n t o> n tdtdtooioioomcow cocococococo^^^' t- m o ^ co >* in N <N IN (N N N co co t- 05.-i rh O lo *» "tf ^ lo lo lo lo lo lo Oiiooojaiaiococo rfhinnholonm CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO W Oi o ^ m CM CD O "3- t- t- t- t- t- ^t-mloohlch oioihooiiinn lomcocomcococo OltOfflt^NtDMON lommminincococo h n n Tf n «tttmuo^mioin CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO 3»^oq^ooq<*oqH NNNNNNfflMCO CO CO CO CO CO CO 8 CM CM CM v r 03 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO co W oa < J= 4= 2 c 6 fc. a tt rt o o o ZZZ^OUwww O 13 cj * ZZZ^OHwoocc

582 Indiana Academy of Science maximum and minimum temperatures, relate to the change of observation time from evening hours to morning hours. Operational demands have tended to favor this shift of time in reading the instruments. It was shown by Schaal and Dale (1977) that this shift induces a lower mean minimum and mean temperature in computing the 24-hour (observational day) average temperature. The divisional temperature is in turn reduced, other factors remaining the same. For example, the lowest temperature in a 24-hour period is reported twice when the temperature at the beginning is much lower than at the end of the 24 hours which is often the case for a 7 a.m. observation time. If the observation time is 6 p.m. there is no carry-over minimum temperature, but there may be a carry-over maximum and an upward temperature bias. The obvious trend in Figure 3 contributes "non-climatic cooling" to the normals. 1985 Figure 3. Percentage of stations published with temperatures obtained with morning observational times. Climatological Data, Indiana, for indicated year. An endeavor to evaluate these temperatures biases caused by changes in observation times, instrumentation and network configuration was described by Nelson et al. (1979). Briefly, monthly divisional and temperature averages for summer months were adjusted using stations with consistently the same departures from the area mean temperature to adjust temperatures of other stations showing sharp changes from the division average within a few months. The divisional averages in Climatological Data-Indiana were then adjusted to the 1976 network configuration, and the average for the state was computed using area weighted division averages, National Climatic Center (1978). In Figure 4 from Nelson et al. (1979), August normals for 1931-60, 1941-70, and 1951-80 were plotted. They correspond closely to the corrected year-to-year August regression. The new temperature normals, at least for the state, seem to agree with the state adjusted

Soil and Atmospheric Sciences 583 Figure 4. Indiana state average mean temperatures for June, July and August, 1930-76, calculated for a 1976 base, (Nelson et al. 1979). Lines represent separate regressions of indicated monthly mean temperature on year. State average mean temperature normals for August for 1931-1960, 1941-1970, and 1951-1980 plotted at middle of indicated 30-year period. mean temperature series for August, showing a climatic cooling tend of about 2 F. for the last 30 years. It is believed that the spatial variability of precipitation is so great that changes in network configuration are less important and the new normals are accepted as the best estimates available. Conclusion The use of the new temperature normals in the 1980s will likely result in an increase of above normal temperatures because the normal has been lowered from the previous one. The converse also is likely true: In recent years normals have been too high resulting in a bias toward reporting more below normal temperatures than warranted. Most impact will be felt in the more objectivelyused heating degree day normals. Their greater accumulation through a season will raise the level of normalcy and result in more below normal heating degree day seasons than in recent past seasons. Literature Cited Nelson, Wm. L., R. F. Dale and L. A. Schaal. 1979. Non-Climatic Trends in Divisional and State Mean Temperatures: A Case Study in Indiana. Journal of Applied Meteorology. 6:750-760. Schaal, L. A., and R. F. Dale. 1977. Time of Observation Temperature Bias and "Climatic Change". Journal of Applied Meteorology. 3:215-222.

584 Indiana Academy of Science 3. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Environmental Data and Information Service, National Climatic Center, Asheville, N.C. 1956-1980. Climatological Data, Indiana. 4. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Environmental Data and Information Service, National Climatic Center, Asheville, N.C. 1978. State, Regional, and National Monthly and Annual Temperatures Weighted by Area (Jan. 1931 -Dec. 1977), 67 p.