Contents. What Are We Looking For? Predicted D

Similar documents
Study of the Electromagnetic Dalitz decay of J/ψ e + e - π 0

Recent Results from CLEO

ωω: J. Albert Caltech March 24, 2006

* ) B s( * ) B s( - 2 -

CLEO c. Anders Ryd Cornell University June 7, e e cc D D. D K,D K e

Study of the decays at Wasa-at-COSY. Elisabetta Prencipe on behalf of the Wasa Collaboration MesonNet Workshop, 17th -19th June 2013, Praha

Measurement of Observed Cross Sections for e + e hadrons non-d D. Charmonium Group Meeting

Outline: Absolute Charm Branching Fractions D0 and D+ Rare and inclusive modes Final states with KS or KL. Anders Ryd Cornell University Presented at

Feasibility of a cross-section measurement for J/ψ->ee with the ATLAS detector

New Measurements of ψ(3770) Resonance Parameters & DD-bar Cross Section at BES-II & CLEO-c

Muon reconstruction performance in ATLAS at Run-2

Search for heavy neutrinos in kaon decays

Semileptonic Decays at CLEO:

arxiv: v2 [hep-ex] 16 Nov 2007

Absolute D Hadronic Branching Fractions at CLEO-c

from B -Factories A. Oyanguren (IFIC U. Valencia) BaBar Collaboration

b and c production in CMS

Measurements of f D + and f Ds

CLEO Results From Υ Decays

Measurements of. Jiangchuan Chen. (for BES Collaboration) Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing , P.R. China

Study on the Two-Photon Transition from ψ(2s) to J/ψ at BESIII

Discovery searches for light new physics with BaBar

CLEO Charmonium Results

Direct Measurement of the W Total Decay Width at DØ. Outline

Searches for New Physics in quarkonium decays at BaBar/Belle

Physics at Hadron Colliders

Analysis of the forbidden decay 0 +e + +e with WASA-at-COSY

V ub measurements with the BaBar detector

Measurements of the W Boson Mass and Trilinear Gauge Boson Couplings at the Tevatron

Search for the η e + e - decay at the SND detector

Hadronic D Decays and the D Meson Decay Constant with CLEO c

Monte Carlo Simulations for PANDA

Tesi di Laurea Specialistica

Measurements of R K and R K* at LHCb

Evidence for D 0 - D 0 mixing. Marko Starič. J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia. March XLII Rencontres de Moriond, La Thuile, Italy

Measurement of the baryon number transport with LHCb

Searches for Exotics in Upsilon Decays in BABAR

Studies of D πeν and D Keν at CLEO-c University of Virginia High Energy Seminar

Measurements of the Proton and Kaon Form Factors via ISR at BABAR

D Hadronic Branching Fractions and DD Cross Section at ψ (3770) from CLEO c

Complementary M H Measurements at ILC

Invariant Mass, Missing Mass, jet reconstruction and jet flavour tagging

Precise measurements of the W mass at the Tevatron and indirect constraints on the Higgs mass. Rencontres de Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions

QCD Multijet Background and Systematic Uncertainties in Top Physics

Measurement of the Z ττ cross-section in the semileptonic channel in pp collisions at s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector

Lepton Universality in ϒ(nS) Decays at CLEO

PRECISION MEASUREMENTS

FAN YANG Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA Received September 14, 2011 Revised September 14, 2011

Measuring η π+ π- e+ e- with WASA at COSY. Daniel Coderre Hirschegg 2010

Bottomonia & charmonia at B-factories

BABAR Results on Hadronic Cross Sections with Initial State Radiation (ISR)

ATLAS: Status and First Results

Jet Reconstruction and Energy Scale Determination in ATLAS

Exclusive Central π+π- Production in Proton Antiproton Collisions at the CDF

Study of τ Decays to Four-Hadron Final States with Kaons

New B D Result from. Thomas Kuhr LMU Munich FPCP

DESY Summer Students Program 2008: Exclusive π + Production in Deep Inelastic Scattering

A Comprehensive Study of the Radiative Decay of J/ψ and ψ(2s) to Pseudoscalar Meson Pairs and Search for Glueballs

Oliver Stelzer-Chilton University of Oxford High Energy Physics Seminar Michigan State University

D0 and D+ Hadronic Decays at CLEO

Introduction. The Standard Model

Overview of the Higgs boson property studies at the LHC

New Physics search in penguin B-decays

First Results from CLEO-c

The η-meson Decay Program at WASA-at-COSY

A. J. Schwartz Physics Department, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio USA

PRECISION&MEASUREMENTS&

Study of Transitions and Decays of Bottomonia at Belle

Recent Results of + c + X and + b + X Production Cross Sections at DØ

Prospects for quarkonium studies at LHCb. «Quarkonium Production at the LHC» workshop

1 Motivation 2 Measurement of Br(Ψ(2S) ωη) 3 Measurement of Br(J/Ψ ωη) 4 Systematic error analysis 5 Summary and Outlook

Physics with Tau Lepton Final States in ATLAS. Felix Friedrich on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration

Dark matter searches and prospects at the ATLAS experiment

Recent V ub results from CLEO

J/ψ production related analysis at Belle

Bottomonium Results from CLEO

PHI PSI 08. Federico Nguyen. International Workshop on e+e- collisions from Phi to Psi

Jet reconstruction in LHCb searching for Higgs-like particles

Recent Results from the BESIII Experiment. Ryan Mitchell Indiana University Miami 2011 December 17, 2011

Measurements of Cross Sections for e + e - m + m - at Energies from 3.8 to 4.6 GeV

V b. (u,c,t) d. d W. (u,c,t)

Dark Photon Search at BaBar

Introduction The CLEO detector and Y(5S) data sample Analysis techniques: Exclusive approach Inclusive approach Summary

Hadronic events in e + e -

Recent results on search for new physics at BaBar

ATLAS NOTE. September 26, 2016

Determination of the strong coupling constant from multi-jet production with the ATLAS detector

Analysis of Top Quarks Using a Kinematic Likelihood Method

CDF top quark " $ )(! # % & '

W mass measurement in the ATLAS experiment

Status of the LHCb experiment and minimum bias physics

Zhen Gao University of Science and Technology of China November 21th, 2013

THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS & SCIENCES W BOSON PRODUCTION CHARGE ASYMMETRY IN THE ELECTRON CHANNEL ASHLEY S HUFF

First V+jets results with CMS. Vitaliano Ciulli (Univ. & INFN Firenze) V+jets workshop, 8-10 Sep 2010, Durham

Susanna Costanza. (Università degli Studi di Pavia & INFN Pavia) on behalf of the ALICE Collaboration

Performance of muon and tau identification at ATLAS

Belle Hot Topics. Nagoya University Koji Ikado (for the Belle Collaboration) Flavor Physics and CP Violation Conference (FPCP2006) Apr.

VBF SM Higgs boson searches with ATLAS

V0 cross-section measurement at LHCb. RIVET analysis module for Z boson decay to di-electron

Search for Minimal Universal Extra Dimensions in 8 TeV pp collisions in the ATLAS detector

Transcription:

Contents D * e S DS e Souvik Das, Anders Ryd Cornell University What Are We Looking For? Predicted D * S D S e e - Rate Decay Modes of D S Used Fitting Soft Electrons Signal Samples Background Samples Dataset Looked At Criteria Common to All D S Modes Selection Criteria for the K K - π Mode Prediction for Data Summary and Plans 9 July 2009

What Are We Looking For? We are looking for D S * D S e e - ( c.c.) processes. We fully reconstruct the D S * The D S is reconstructed through several decay channels using DTag s default criteria. See CBX 06-11. The e e- share ~ 144 MeV. Pion fitted tracks for electrons (default in CLEO) at such low energies may not be reliable. Need fitting to electron hypothesis. Events are selected using m DS, m BC, δm Selection criteria on the e e - tracks to reject conversion background D S * D S γ Alternative analysis that reconstructs the D S- can give us more statistics. 2

Predicted D * S D S e e - Rate If we write the decay of the D S * to a real photon in the form: Evaluating the spin-average of the invariant amplitudes and integrating over phase space, we roughly predict the ratio of decay rates: Γ M * ( DS DS e e ) * Γ( D D ) S ν ε µ = * ε T ( P, k) D γ µν Then we can write the decay to e e - in the form: υσ µ ig M ε * T ( P, k) u ( p) ie v( p') D µν γ S 2 σ k = S Sγ 1.4α = 0.01 3

Decay Modes of Decay Modes of D S Used Used γγ η η π π η ηπ γγ η ηπ π ; ; ; S S S S D D K K D K K D We reconstruct the D s through the following decay modes: 4 γ ρ η ηπ π π ρ γγ η ηρ π π π π π γγ η η π π η ηπ 0 0 *0 0 * *0 * ; ; ; ; ; ; ; S S S S S S D D K K K K K K D D D

Fitting Soft Electrons to the Electron Hypothesis Reco MC Truth Electron Energy Reco MC Truth Electron Energy Pion fit Electron fit We expect soft electron tracks with p T < 70 MeV. Fitting electrons to the pion hypothesis is not reliable in this domain. Fitting to the electron hypothesis gives better energy resolution. Signal and conversion background samples we generate have electrons fitted to the electron hypothesis. CLEO data does not have tracks fitted to the electron hypothesis. 5

Parameterizing Energy of Soft Pion Fitted Electrons We fitted the energy resolution of the soft pion-fitted electrons with: E reco E MC = 1.636 10 3 4.518 10 E 2 reco 5 Parameterized energy correction to pion fitted electrons. Energy resolution of electron fitted electrons. 6

Parameterizing Energy of Soft Pion Fitted Electrons Red are the pion-fitted electron sample Green are the parameterized pion-fitted electron sample. Blue are the electron-fitted electron sample. Applied cuts: dsplusm - 1.96849 < 0.011 GeV deltae < 0.05 GeV mbc - 2.112 < 0.02 GeV 7

Parameterizing Energy of Soft Pion Fitted Electrons Parameterizing energy of soft pion fitted tracks only shifts peaks of kinematic cuts, doesn t increase signal yield. MC matched electrons with \theta=0.05. (# matched e in pi-fit) / (# matched e in e-fit) ~ 0.93 Close to ratio of events under electron-fit and parameterized pion-fit peaks in the kinematic variables. Suggests a fundamental reconstruction/track-fitting inefficiency when using pion hypothesis for low energies. We need electron fits. 8

Interdependence of Kinematic Variables We defined our kinematic variables: We can write a relationship between these variables So having cut on M(Ds decay) as well, we may cut on only 2 of the 3 kinematic variables. Plots of one kinematic variable with cuts on the other two suggest de as dispensable. 9

Signal Samples For signal Monte Carlo, we force the e e - collision to produce a Ψ(4160), and that to decay into D s *, D s - We added an EVTGEN plug-in to generate vector (D s * ) to scalar (D s ), lepton (e - ), lepton (e ) distributions with the invariant amplitude in consideration, apart from the invariant phase space factor. The D s was forced to decay through each of the previously mentioned channels. The D s- was allowed to decay generically. We fitted electrons to the electron hypothesis instead of the pion hypothesis. We generated 10,000 signal MC events for each decay mode of the D s. 10

Conversion Background Samples A background that resembles the signal is expected from D s * decaying to D s, γ and the γ converting to e e - in the beam-pipe material. Given that the beam-pipe is ~ 0.5% of a radiation length, we can estimate this conversion background to occur at roughly the same frequency as the signal. For this conversion background Monte Carlo, we force the e e - collision to produce a Ψ(4160), and then that to decay into the D s *, D s-. The D s * now decays via D s, γ. The conversion of the photon to e e - is taken care of in the detector simulation. We fitted electrons to the electron hypothesis instead of the pion hypothesis. We generated 100,000 events for each decay mode of the D s. 11

Dataset Looked At We have looked at 110 pb -1 of data to determine the feasibility of this analysis. We used data collected at E CM = 4170 MeV (dataset 47) CLEO-c has 602 pb -1 of data at this energy. D S * D S- D S *- D S cross section is ~ 1 nb at this energy. 12

Selection Criteria Common to All D S Decay Modes Electron tracks must pass track quality cuts: 10 MeV < Track Momentum < 2.0 GeV χ 2 < 100,000 d 0 < 5 mm, z 0 < 5 cm The track s de/dx is required to be within 3.0 σ of that expected for an electron. The DTag tools applied their default criteria for the eight investigated modes. These cuts, and the reconstruction of a D S * were required for filling our n-tuples on which we applied subsequent cuts. 13

The K K - π Decay Mode The following slides illustrate the selection criteria used to distinguish the signal from the conversion background by focusing on the D s K K - π channel. The top plot in red is the signal. The middle plot in blue is the conversion background. The bottom plot in green is the data. 14

K K - π Mode D S Mass Cut Reconstructed D S Mass We cut on D S Mass 1.969 GeV < 0.011 GeV 15

K K - π Mode E Cut Mode E Cut ) ( ) ( D * beam E e e K K E E = π 16 We cut on E <0.019 GeV ) ( ) ( beam D E e e K K E E S = π

K K - π Mode m BC Cut m BC * 2 = E ( D beam ) P ( K K π e e 2 S ) Will cut on m BC 2.112 GeV < 0.008 GeV 17

K K - π Mode δm Cut δm = M ( K K π e e ) M ( K K π ) We cut on δm 0.1455 GeV < 0.0085 GeV 18

K K - π Mode d 0 Cut d 0 between the electron and positron in the signal (red) and conversion (blue) The d 0 = d 1 d 2 is centered around 0 for the signal and offset from 0 for conversion backgrounds We require d 1 d 2 > -0.004 m 19

K K - π Mode Φ Cut Φ between the electron and positron in the signal (red) and conversion (blue) Φ = Φ 1 Φ 2 is centered around 0 for the signal and offset for the conversion background. We require Φ < 0.1 20

K K - π Mode Φ vs d 0 The Φ & d 0 between the electron and positron in the signal (red) and conversion (blue) 21

Prediction for Data Decay Mode of the D S Remaining in Signal Sample starting from 10,000 events Remaining in Background Sample starting from 100,000 events Signal Events Expected in 110 pb -1 Background Events Expected in 110 pb -1 Events in 110 pb -1 (electrons still fitted to pion hypothesis) K K - pi 815 2 4.743 0.114 2 K s K 712 3 1.123 0.046 0 π η; ηγγ 839 2 0.551 0.129 0 π ή; ήπ π - η; 504 1 0.356 0.007 1 ηγγ π π - π 1200 2 1.415 0.023 2 K * K *0 ; K * K 0 Sπ ; K *0 K - π 453 2 0.789 0.034 2 ηρ ; ηγγ; 641 8 3.492 0.427 6 ρ π π 0 ήπ ; ήρ 0 γ 875 8 1.032 0.092 0 Total 13.74 0.757 13 Total number of signal events expected in 602 inv-pb ~ 74 Total number of conversion background events expected in 602 inv-pb ~ 4 22

π 0 e e - γ in Generic Monte Carlo As a sanity check, we studied 109 /pb of generic MC for 4170 MeV with the usual selection criteria. We expected ~ 5 conversion events after selection criteria, but we see only 2 conversion events in the 10 events left over in the generic MC. 8 of them have pi0 -> e e- gamma events. Run 23085, event 14904 psi(4160) --> D*- D pi0; D*- --> D- pi0; pi0 --> e e- gamma Run 230812, event 1070 psi(4160) --> D_s* D_s-; D_s* --> D_s gamma; D_s --> rho eta ; eta' --> pi0 pi0 eta; pi0 --> e e- gamma 23

π 0 e e - γ! Run 230819, event 1534 psi(4160) --> D_s* D_s-; D_s* --> D_s gamma; D_s --> eta mu nu_mu; eta --> pi0 pi0 pi0; pi0 --> e e- gamma Run 231112, event 845 psi(4160) --> D_s*- D_s; D_s --> pi pi pi- pi0; pi0 --> e e- gamma Run 231200, event 1217 Conversion Run 231443, event 3126 psi(4160) --> D_s*- D_s; D_s*- --> D_s- gamma; D_s- --> rho- eta; eta --> pi0 pi0 pi0; pi0 --> e e- gamma R un 231637, event 13649 psi(4160) --> D_s* D_s-; D_s- --> phi rho-; rho- --> pi- pi0; pi0 --> e e- gamma Run 231923, event 5080 Conversion, but ee- doesn t match reco! Run 232008, event 8741 psi(4160) --> D*0 anti-d*0; D*0 --> D0 pi0; D0 --> a_1 K-; a_1 --> rho pi0; pi0 --> e e- gamma Run 232222, event 14279 psi(4160) --> D_s*- D_s; D_s*- --> D_s- gamma; D_s- --> pi- pi- pi pi0 pi0 pi0; pi0 --> e e- gamma 24

π 0 e e - γ in Generic Monte Carlo This background will have to estimated from data. Why the kinematic variables peak within selection ranges is a mystery perhaps we shape it. Need more data. 25

Fitting Generic Monte Carlo Φ The signal was maximum likelihood fit to 3 Gaussians within Φ < 2. The conversion background was maximum likelihood fit to 2 Gaussians within Φ < 2. 10 ± 5 signal events were fit under the peak. Zero are expected (not estimating pi0 Dalitz decays) 37 ± 7 conversion events were fit and 39 ± 3 were expected. 26

Fitting Data Φ The signal was maximum likelihood fit to 3 Gaussians within Φ < 2. The conversion background was maximum likelihood fit to 2 Gaussians within Φ < 2. 3 signal events were fit under the peak. 2e-6 conversion events were fit. 27

Low Energy Electron Reconstruction Efficiency We are using the Dalitz decay of the π 0 in: Ψ(2S) J/ψ π 0 π 0 J/ψ e e - ; µ µ - π 0 γ γ π 0 γ e e - to estimate the efficiency for reconstructing electrons at energies between 40 and 140 MeV. We cut on the J/Psi mass reconstructed from ee- or mumu- (describe track criteria). We cut on the pi0 pull mass at 1 sigma. (Describe shower criteria.) Using the J/Psi, a photon and an electron, and assuming the Psi(2S) was created at rest, we construct an expected 4- vector for the last electron. Looping over all last electrons in the event, we reconstruct a Psi(2S) 4-vector. This is required to be at rest and have the right mass. 28

Low Energy Electron Reconstruction Efficiency If the Psi(2S) satisfies the previous conditions, we plot the invariant mass squared of the expected electron (missing mass squared) in the efficient reconstruction plot. (Top plot.) If the Psi(2S) does not satisfy its conditions, this means no corresponding electron was found. (Bottom plot.) Events under the peak in the top plot are those where an electron was expected and reconstructed. Events outside the peak in the top plot are interpreted as those we did not expect but find. Events under the peak in the bottom plot are those where we expected an electron and didn t find any. Events outside the peak in the bottom plot are those where we didn t expect an electron and didn t find any. 29

Low Energy Electron Reconstruction Efficiency By just cutting and counting, we estimate the efficiency of electron reconstruction by the ratio of events under the two peaks while keeping the background in mind. 80% We should fit the plots for a better measurement. We should limit the expected 4-vector within the theta range of the CLEO detector. We should break this down into a few bins of energy to get numbers for various ranges of energies. 30

Electron Fitting of Data Dan Riley staged out runs 230474 to 230617 of dataset 47. We generated an IDXA file containing the run and event numbers we are interested in, i.e. events with any Ds tag in them. Using this IDXA file we skimmed those events into a local PDS file in raw format. Pass2 has been run on this with electron fitting included. The electron tracks are seen to have slightly different track parameters from their corresponding pion tracks. We are now checking to make sure that the DTag information, like the Ds mass, is exactly reproduced. This is not the case, however! 31

Summary and Plans This analysis is feasible with the data available at CLEO. The theoretically predicted ratio of the rate of D S * D S e e - to the rate of D S * D S γ can be refined. Selection criteria for all the decay modes need to be optimized systematically. Still studying how best to separate signal from conversion background. We can reconstruct the other D S- in the event and increase statistics. We need to measure the tracking efficiency for low momentum electrons. Events in data that pass some loose selection criteria will need to have tracks fitted to the electron hypothesis. 32

Backup Slides 33