Geochemical monitoring of the response ofgeothermal reservoirs to production load examples from Krafla, Iceland

Similar documents
CHEMICAL GEOTHERMOMETERS FOR GEOTHERMAL EXPLORATION

Geochemical Characteristics of Reservoir Fluid from NW-Sabalan Geothermal Field, Iran

Geochemical Modelling of Low-Temperature Geothermal Fields from Bihor County, Romania

Enhancement of Silica-Enthalpy Mixing Model to Predict Enthalpy of Geothermal Reservoir

FLUID-MINERAL EQUILIBRIA AND SUBSURFACE TEMPERATURE EVALUATION OF SELECTED HOT SPRINGS, JIANGXI PROVINCE, SE-CHINA

SOLUTE AND GAS GEOTHERMOMETERS

Prediction of Calcite Scaling at the Oguni Geothermal Field, Japan: Chemical Modeling Approach

GAS GEOTHERMOMETRY AND EQUILIBRIA IN ICELANDIC GEOTHERMAL SYSTEMS

Geochemistry and Isotope Study of Discharged Geothermal Fluids, NW Sabalan Geothermal Field, NW Iran

DEVIATIONS IN SILICA GEOTHERMOMETRY AT WAIRAKEI. Brian Lovelock

A New Method of Evaluation of Chemical Geothermometers for Calculating Reservoir Temperatures from Thermal Springs in Nevada

INTERPRETATION OF GEOCHEMICAL WELL TEST DATA FOR WELLS OW-903B, OW-904B AND OW-909 OLKARIA DOMES, KENYA

SURFACE EXPLORATION AND MONITORING OF GEOTHERMAL ACTIVITY IN THE KVERKFJÖLL GEOTHERMAL AREA, CENTRAL ICELAND

THE CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF GEOTHERMAL FLUIDS IN JIAODONG PENINSULA, SHANDONG, CHINA

Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Kagoshima University

Isotope and Gas Geochemistry of Dieng Geothermal Field, Indonesia

Geochemical Monitoring of the Lakes District Area

JosC Tenorio Mejia', Franco D'Amore' and Jane Y. Gerardo3

GEOCHEMICAL INTERPRETATION OF THERMAL FLUID DISCHARGE FROM WELLS AND SPRINGS IN BERLÍN GEOTHERMAL FIELD, EL SALVADOR

MODELING OF FORMATION OF ACID WATER DISCHARGED FROM HIGH TEMPERATURE GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR

Luigi Marini and Claudio Pasqua. ELC-Electroconsult S.p.A. Via 1 Maggio 41, I Baranzate, Milano, Italy

THE FLUID CHARACTERISTICS OF THREE EXPLORATION WELLS DRILLED AT OLKARIA-DOMES FIELD, KENYA

Fluid Geochemistry at the Nir Geothermal Field, Nw-Iran

Systematics of Rare Alkalis and Halogens in the High-Temperature Mahanagdong Geothermal Field, Leyte, Philippines

Geothermometer, Geoindicator and Isotope Monitoring in Lahendong Wells during

APPLICATION OF GEOCHEMICAL METHODS IN GEOTHERMAL EXPLORATION

ASSESSMENT OF GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES AT THE AL-LITH AREA, KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA

The Initial-State Geochemistry as a Baseline for Geochemical Monitoring at Ulubelu Geothermal Field, Indonesia

Iceland Water Chemistry Group presents the chemical speciation program WATCH

WATER-ROCK INTERACTION IN THE BAKKI LOW-TEMPERATURE GEOTHERMAL FIELD, SW-ICELAND

MULTICOMPONENT EQUILIBRIUM MODELS FOR TESTING GEOTHERMOMETRY APPROACHES

Structural Controls on the Chemistry and Output of the Wells in the Olkaria Geothermal Field, Kenya

Effective geochemical methods for identifying geothermal systems in the western branch of the EARS

GAS EQUILIBRIA CONTROLLING H 2 S IN DIFFERENT PHILIPPINE GEOTHERMAL FIELDS

APPLICATION OF GEOCHEMICAL METHODS IN GEOTHERMAL EXPLORATION. Halldór Ármannsson November 2007

GEOTHERMAL EXPLORATION PHASE

Characterization of the Menengai High Temperature Geothermal Reservoir Using Gas Chemistry

predictive mineral discovery*cooperative Research Centre A legacy for mineral exploration science Mineral Systems Q3 Fluid reservoirs

GEOCHEMICAL INTERPRETATION OF THERMAL WATER AND BOREHOLE WATER FROM THE ASAL-GHOUBBET REGION, DJIBOUTI

Preliminary Assessment of the Ohinewai Low Enthalpy Geothermal System, New Zealand

GEOCHEMICAL INTERPRETATION OF THE MASAYA-GRANADA-NANDAIME CHEMICAL DATA, NICARAGUA

INTERPRETATION OF CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF GEOTHERMAL FLUID FROM THE GEOTHERMAL FIELD OF BARANSKY VOLCANO, ITURUP ISLAND, RUSSIA

Active Faults and Geothermal Potential in Vietnam: a Case Study in Uva Area, Dien Bien Phu Basin, Along Dien Bien -Lai Chau Fault

Various Geoscientific Investigations of Low-Enthalpy Geothermal Sites in the United Arab Emirates

Hydrogeology of the Krafla geothermal system, northeast Iceland

ALTERATION ZONATION OF SILICA MINERALS IN A GEOTHERMAL SYSTEM A NUMERICAL SIMULATION BASED ON REACTION-TRANSPORT MODEL

Fluid Chemistry of Menengai Geothermal Wells, Kenya

GEOCHEMISTRY OF THERMAL WATER FROM THE THEISTAREYKIR GEOTHERMAL FIELD IN NE-ICELAND COMPARED TO THAT OF THE GEOTHERMAL PROSPECTS IN NW-RWANDA

APPLICATION OF GEOCHEMICAL METHODS IN GEOTHERMAL EXPLORATION

DISSOLUTION, TRANSPORT AND PRECIPITATION OF SILICA IN GEOTHERMAL SYSTEM

APPLICATION OF GEOCHEMICAL METHODS IN GEOTHERMAL EXPLORATION

Kizito Maloba Opondo. Kenya Electricity Generating Company

David I. Norman and Joseph N. Moore

Geochemical and Hydrological Assessment of Thermal Features in the Vicinity of the Champagne Pool in the Waiotapu Geothermal System

Preparation for a New Power Plant in the Hengill Geothermal Area, Iceland

WAMUNYU EDWARD MUREITHI I13/2358/2007

HIGH TEMPERATURE HYDROTHERMAL ALTERATION IN ACTIVE GEOTHERMAL SYSTEMS A CASE STUDY OF OLKARIA DOMES

CHEMISTRY IN EXPLORATION OF A GEOTHERMAL FIELD

GEOCHEMICAL INTERPRETATION OF THERMAL WATER AND GAS SAMPLES FROM KRISUVIK, ICELAND AND ALID, ERITREA

Yellowstone National Park: Regional Groundwater Dynamics in High-Temperature Geothermal Areas

History of Chemical Composition of Geothermal Fluids in Krafla, Northeast Iceland, with Special Emphasis on the Liquid Phase

THE GEOTHERMAL POTENTIAL OF BILIRAN ISLAND, PHILIPPINES

GEOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ACID FLUIDS IN MT PINATUBO, PHILIPPINES

South Island Barrier Volcano Namarunu. Emuruangogolak. Kilimanjaro

Geochemical Modeling of Acidic Geothermal Fluids using SOLVEQ and CHIM-xpt

Heat (& Mass) Transfer. conceptual models of heat transfer. large scale controls on fluid movement. distribution of vapor-saturated conditions

The geothermal potential of Jizan area, Southwestern parts of Saudi Arabia

GEOCHEMICAL STUDY OF THE XIANYANG LOW-TEMPERATURE GEOTHERMAL FIELD, SHAANXI PROVINCE, CHINA

Fluid Chemistry Scenarios Anticipated for IDDP-2 to be Drilled in Reykjanes, Iceland

Chapter 13. Groundwater

HYDROTHERMAL FLUID FLOW AND MINERAL ALTERATION IN A FRACTURED ROCK UNDER MULTIPHASE H 2O- CO 2 MIXTURE CONDITIONS

Quantification of the 3D thermal anomaly in the orogenic geothermal system at Grimsel Pass

INTRODUCTION TO GEOCHEMICAL MAPPING

Abstract. Ruth N. Wamalwa 1, Aaron K. Waswa 2*, Cristopher N. Nyamai 2, Josephat Mulwa 2, Wills J. Ambusso 3

Sampling and analysis of geothermal fluids

THE IMPLICATION OF 34 S AND 18 O ISOTOPE SYSTEMATICS ON THE SULFUR CYCLE IN MAHANAGDONG HYDROTHERMAL SYSTEM (PHILIPPINESS)

GEOTHERMAL BOREHOLE INVESTIGATIONS DURING AND AFTER DRILLING

Bouillante geothermal field: mixing and water/rock interaction processes at 250C.

REDUCING COST AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF GEOTHERMAL POWER THROUGH MODELING OF CHEMICAL PROCESSES IN THE RESERVOIR

Chemistry of Thermal Waters and Gases in Iceland * Introduction

NOTICE CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS

Evidence of a recent input of magmatic gases into the quiescent volcanic edifice of Panarea, Aeolian Islands, Italy

Accurate Evaluation of Thermodynamic Properties of Geothermal Gases from an Equation of State with Field Applications

EVALUATION OF FACTORS CONTROLLING THE CONCENTRATION OF NON-CONDENSIBLE GASES AND THEIR POSSIBLE IMPACT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF WELLS IN OLKARIA, KENYA

Isotopic Characteristics (δ 18 O, δd, δ 13 C, 14 C) of Thermal Waters in the Mosfellssveit and Reykjavík Low-Temperature Areas, Iceland

GEOCHEMISTRY CHANGE DURING CIRCULATION TEST OF EGS SYSTEM

Chapter 14: Groundwater. Fig 14.5b

Study on the Geochemistry of Potential High Temperature Geothermal Resources in Taxkorgan, Xinjiang, China

BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCE

2. California Energy Company, Inc. 3. Thermochem, Inc.

The importance of understanding coupled processes in geothermal reservoirs. Thomas Driesner October 19, 2016

Geochemistry: water-rock interaction, water and gas geochemistry, isotopes, geothermometry

Reservoir Processes Inferred by Geochemical, Stable Isotopes and Gas Equilibrium Data in Cerro Prieto, B.C., México

GEOCHEMISTRY OF RWENZORI HOT SPRINGS. Vincent Kato Department of Geological Survey and Mines, Entebbe, Uganda

Hydrogeochemical study of the Resadiye (Tokat) geothermal field, Turkey

ISOTOPE HYDROLOGY STUDIES OF KATWE, BURANGA AND KIBIRO GEOTHERMAL SYSTEMS, UGANDA

RESPONSE OF WAIRAKEI GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR TO 40 YEARS OF PRODUCTION

CO 2 and heat fluxes in the Apennines, Italy

PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF HYDROTHERMAL HEAT CARRIER OF MUTNOVSKOYE FIELD

Use of a New Sodium/Lithium (Na/Li) Geothermometric Relationship for High-Temperature Dilute Geothermal Fluids from Iceland

Transcription:

International Geothermal Conference, Reykjavík, Sept. 23 Session #7 Geochemical monitoring of the response ofgeothermal reservoirs to production load examples from Krafla, Iceland Stefán Arnórsson 1 and Björn Th. Gudmundsson 2 1 Science Institute, University of Iceland, Dunhagi 3, 17 Reykjavík, Iceland 2 VGK Consulting Engineers Ltd, Laugavegur 178, 15 Reykjavík, Iceland Email: stefanar@raunvis.hi.is Abstract Monitoring of the chemical composition of water and steam discharged from wells in exploited geothermal fields provides information on the response of the reservoir to the production load. Decrease in the Cl concentration in the discharged water indicates relative increase in recharge into producing aquifers of colder water but an increase in Cl indicates recharge from hotter zones. When a well discharge consists of components with different source temperatures, the consequence is discrepancy between geothermometry temperatures. The cause of discrepancy may also be variable departure from equilibrium for individual geothermometers. Keywords: geochemical monitoring, response to production, geothermometers, recharge. 1 Introduction Changes in the chemical composition of water and steam discharged from wells in exploited geothermal systems provide information on the response of the reservoir to the production load with respect to the source of the water recharging producing aquifers (Arnórsson et al., 2). Data on fluid compositions may also provide useful information on the depth level of producing horizons in individual wells (Arnórsson, 2). Gas compositions can be used to estimate the initial steam fraction in the aquifer fluid (D Amore and Celati, 1983; Arnórsson et al. 199), i.e. the steam fraction in the aquifer fluid beyond the depressurization zone that forms around producing wells. The present contribution uses data from the Krafla geothermal system in Iceland to demonstrate how discrepancy between geothermometry temperatures and changes in Cl concentrations of well discharges can be used to identify fluid temperatures in feed zones and the source of water recharging producing aquifers. At Krafla a 3 MW geothermal power station was commissioned in 1978. In 1998 it was enlarged to 6 MW. A total of 35 wells have been drilled in the area of which 21 are productive at present. 2 Some basic concepts Fluid discharged from wells penetrating rocks of an-isotropic permeability, such as at Krafla, is a mixture of many components that have traveled different distances at different velocities from their points of origin to the well. The concentrations of dissolved solids and gases in the discharge of wells penetrating such rocks, is the product of the chemical composition of each source component and its relative contribution to the well discharge. A change in the relative amounts of these S7 Paper117 Page 3

International Geothermal Conference, Reykjavík, Sept. 23 Session #7 components will lead to a change in the composition of the discharged fluid unless their chemical composition was the same. Dissolved solids and gases in geothermal fluids have been divided into two groups, as conservative and reactive components (Giggenbach, 1991). The aqueous concentrations of conservative components, such as Cl, are determined by their supply to the water. Once they have entered the aqueous phase they remain there. Reactive components, on the other hand, tend to equilibrate with hydrothermal minerals, which incorporate these components and provide useful information on the physical state of geothermal systems (Giggenbach, 1991). The sources of conservative components to geothermal fluids include the rock with which the fluid has interacted but also degassing magma and the recharging water. The amount of interaction with the enclosing rock is determined by the residence time of the fluid in this rock and temperature. Increase in temperature increases the rate of fluid-rock interaction. The consequence of these processes is that geothermal fluids, particularly when of high temperature, contain higher concentrations of conservative elements than non-thermal ground waters and surface waters. A decrease in the concentrations of Cl and other conservative components in water discharged from geothermal wells is the consequence of a relative increase of water low in Cl and this is taken to be colder water (Gudmundsson and Arnórsson, 22). The equilibrium constants for reactions involving reactive aqueous components and hydrothermal minerals vary with temperature and pressure. Changes of fluid temperature and pressure, as fluid flows from its place of origin into a well, therefore changes its state of mineral saturation and may lead to changes in fluid composition by mineral dissolution or precipitation depending on kinetic factors. Mixing of water components has the same effect. Changes in pressure, in the range occurring in geothermal systems, have much lesser effect on changes in the state of mineral saturation than temperature changes. This is exemplified for quartz (SiO 2 ) in Figure 1, a common hydrothermal mineral, the solubility of which has been well established experimentally over a wide range of temperature and pressure (Manning, 1994, Rimstidt, 1997). A drop of pressure from 3 to bars at 1 C leads to a change in the saturation index by.16 for the quartz dissolution reaction: SiO 2,quartz + 2H 2 O = H 4 SiO 4 (1) This corresponds to a decrease in quartz solubility by 2 ppm. The corresponding numbers for a decrease in pressure of 2 and 3 C water from 3 bars to their vapour saturation pressures is 13. and 73.6 ppm, respectively. Pressure drop from 3 to 1 bars decreases quartz solubility by the same amount as a temperature increase at 3 bars from 286 to 3 C. Many reactive components and reactive component ratios have been successively used as geothermometers (e.g. Fournier and Potter, 1982; Giggenbach, 198, 1981; Arnórsson et al. 1983; Arnórsson and Gunnlaugsson, 1985). Experience indicates that many geothermometer components, such as those involved for the quartz- and Na/K-geothermometers, react slowly upon cooling and it is generally assumed that the concentration of the respective aqueous components are not affected by changes of temperature and pressure in upflow zones below springs and in aquifers producing into wells. This assumption is, of course, an approximation. Some reaction may be expected to occur, depending on kinetic factors that would affect different geothermometers to a different extent. S7 Paper117 Page 31

International Geothermal Conference, Reykjavík, Sept. 23 Session #7 Saturation index.1.8.6.4.2 -.2 1 C 2 C 3 C 5 1 15 2 25 3 Pressure, bars abs. A Saturation index 1.2 1 B.8.6.4.2 -.2 1 15 2 25 3 Temperature, C Figure 1: Changes in quartz saturation of water initially at equilibrium with quartz. A. Effect of depressurization on quartz saturation for waters at 3, 2 and 1 C as indicated. B. Effect of temperature decrease on quartz saturation at pressure of 1 bars abs. Based on quartz solubility data of Manning (1994). t qtz mix C t Na/K mix C t qtz Na/K C 2 1-1 -2 1 15 2 25 3 3 25 B 2 15 1 5 1 15 2 25 3 1 C -1-2 1 15 2 25 3 A t H2S mix C t H2S qtz C t H2S Na/K C 12 1 8 6 4 2-2 12 1 8 6 4 2-2 14 12 1 8 6 4 2-2 1 15 2 25 3 1 15 2 25 3 1 15 2 25 3 D E F Figure 2: The difference between Na/K-, quartz- and H 2 S-geothermometer temperatures and actual temperatures (t mix ) of variably mixed waters initially at equilibrium with quartz, low-albite and microcline (the Na/K-geothermometer) and a mineral buffer controlling H 2 S. End-member components in the mixed waters are shown by dots. The quartz- and Na/K-geothermometer equations used are those given by Arnórsson (2). S7 Paper117 Page 32

International Geothermal Conference, Reykjavík, Sept. 23 Session #7 Those for H 2 S are based on drillhole data below 21 C (Arnórsson and Gunnlaugsson, 1985) and the mineral buffer prehnite + epidote + pyrite + pyrrhotite above 21 C (Arnórsson et al., 1998) taking the activity of epidote in the clinozoisite-epidote solid solution to be.7. If appropriately calibrated, and if all the source fluid components in a well discharge had the same temperature, all geothermometers should give about the same temperature value assuming, of course, that chemical equilibrium prevailed for all of them. When, on the other hand, a well discharge is a mixture of geothermal fluids of different temperatures, a discrepancy results between the geothermometry temperatures. The effect of such mixing is demonstrated in Figure 2 for the quartz-, Na/K- and H 2 S geothermometers. 3 Boiling Many liquid dominated geothermal reservoirs are two phase. Depressurization in producing aquifers, which occurs when a well is discharged, leads to extensive boiling in the depressurization zone and a decrease in fluid temperature. Extensive boiling in producing aquifers may also occur in initially sub-boiling reservoirs, if the pressure drop is sufficient. Changes in the composition of the water, which occurs in response to steam formation and degassing, in addition to changes temperature and pressure, will lead to changes in the saturation state of the water with respect to minerals. The consequence is potential mineral precipitation or dissolution, its magnitude depending on the kinetic factors. Capillary forces and the relative permeability of flowing water and steam, which relates to the relative volume of the two fluid phases, may cause them to separate at least partly. Such phase separation may change the state of mineral saturation of the flowing water. It will also change the enthalpy of the well discharge relative to the initial aquifer fluid. Heat transfer from the rock to the flowing fluid in the depressurization zone has the same effect. Many of the Krafla wells have excess enthalpy, i.e. their enthalpy is higher than that of steam saturated water at a chemical geothermometer temperature. Partial phase separation in the depressurization zone around wells is considered to be largely the cause of this excess enthalpy in Krafla (Gudmundsson and Arnórsson, 22). The concentration ratios of solids dissolved in the water are not affected by phase separation. Therefore, this process does not affect geothermometers, which are based on component ratios, whereas those are that are based on aqueous or gaseous component concentrations are. The effect of phase separation on concentration based geothermometers, is minimized by calculating component concentration in water and steam at 1 bars abs. vapour pressure (Gudmundsson and Arnórsson, 22). This has been done for the present study. 4 Examples of results The Cl concentration in water discharged from many of the wells at Krafla has decreased with time whereas other discharges have retained constant Cl. This is demonstrated for three of the Krafla wells in Figure 3. For well 9, Cl concentrations have remained about constant in water at 1 bars abs., about 3 ppm through a 2 year observation period. Initially Cl concentrations in water from well 13 fluctuated much but then decreased and stabilized at a concentration very similar to that of well 9. In well 21 Cl concentrations have decreased to about half of the initial value, apparently fastest during the first 5 years of production but since more slowly. The decrease in Cl concentrations in the discharges of wells 13 and 21 are indicative of a S7 Paper117 Page 33

International Geothermal Conference, Reykjavík, Sept. 23 Session #7 relative increase to the discharges in a Cl deficient water component, i.e. in colder water. In harmony with a decrease in the Cl concentrations in water discharged from wells 13 and 21, t qtz t NaK and t H2S have decreased considerably. A decrease is also observed for well 9. Over a 15 year period, 1982-1997, t qtz has decreased by about 1 C in well 9 and t NaK and t H2S a little more. Prior to 1982 decreases in the geothermometry temperatures were more rapid. T qtz is systematically higher than t NaK and t H2S, or by about 2 C. This discrepancy is not considered to be due to an erroneous calibration of the geothermometers. It cannot be explained by mixing of water components of different temperatures. Such mixing would cause t H2S to be highest and t qtz lowest. The difference is too large to be explained by variable effects of pressure on the various geothermometer mineral-solution equilibria but their calibration is valid at vapour saturation pressures but the producing aquifer of well 9 is sub-boiling. It is considered most likely that the cause of the discrepancy is variable departure from equilibrium of the water recharging the producing aquifer. 25 2 Cl, ppm 15 1 5 well 9 well 13 well 21 1976 198 1984 1988 1992 1996 2 Figure 3: Changes in Cl concentrations in water at 1 bars abs. vapour pressure discharged from wells at Krafla, Iceland. Data on the chemical composition of hot spring and fumarole discharges in Iceland, such as in the Geysir Area, in Hveragerdi at Hveravellir and in Landmannalaugar show that t qtz is typically higher than t NaK and t H2S (Arnórsson, 1985; Arnórsson and Gunnlaugsson, 1985). This is attributed to variable reaction rates for the different geothermometer components in the upflow where cooling occurs. These observations, when transferred to data from well 9, imply a relative increase of water into the producing aquifer of the well from shallower and cooler horizons in the reservoir. Temperature measurement in well 13 during thermal recovery after drilling indicated three permeable horizons, at 1, 14 and 15 m depth (Gudmundsson and Arnórsson, 22). The geothermometry temperatures for this well are consistent with contribution from feed zones having significantly different temperatures, as the H 2 S geothermometer yields the highest temperature (Figure 4). In line with the data interpretation for well 9, the discrepancy between t qtz and t NaK indicates recharge from shallow zones in the reservoir. It is envisaged that the discharge of well 13 consists of a bleed from relatively deep hot zone, as indicated by t H2S and increasing recharge from shallow and relatively cold zone as indicated by decreasing t qtz and t NaK and by increasing discrepancy between these geothermometers S7 Paper117 Page 34

International Geothermal Conference, Reykjavík, Sept. 23 Session #7 Temperature, C 33 31 29 27 25 23 21 19 well9 3 28 26 24 22 well13 17 2 2 1975 198 1985 199 1995 2 198 1985 199 1995 2 198 1985 199 1995 2 Fig. 4: Variations in geothermometry temperatures with time for 3 wells at Krafla. Squares t NaK ; dots t qtz, and triangles t H2S. During the first 4 years of discharge of well 21 all the geothermometers considered yielded about the same temperature, the averages for t qtz, t NaK and t H2S being 263, 264 and 265 C, respectively. This corresponds well with the measured temperature in the well when thermally stabilized at the depth level (57 m) of the main permeable horizon, 26 C. In 1986-88 t qtz fell considerably and t NaK even more whereas t H2S has remained about constant. Since 1988 t qtz has remained about constant but t NaK has decrased slightly, by about 1 C. These changes are considered to indicate a small relative increase in a colder water component in the discharge of well 21. The strong decline in Cl concentrations indicates, by contrast, a substantial relative increase in colder water recharge into the producing aquifer of the well. It is considered that the chemical geothermometers indicate only a limited increase in colder water recharge because this water component has had sufficient time to approach chemical equilibrium quite closely at the temperature of the producing aquifer. 5 References Arnórsson, S. (2). The quartz- and Na/K geothermometers. II. Results and application for monitoring studies. World Geothermal Congress 2, pp. 935-94. Arnórsson, S. (1985). The use of mixing models and chemical geothermometers for estimating underground temperatures in geothermal systems. J. Volc. Geothermal Res., Vol. 23, pp. 299-335. Arnórsson, S. and Gunnlaugsson, E. (1985). New gas geothermometers for geothermal ex-ploration-calibration and application. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, Vol. 49, pp. 137-1325. Arnórsson, S., Björnsson, S., Muna, Z.W. and Ojiambo, S.B. (199). The use of gas chemistry to evaluate boiling processes and initial steam fractions in geothermal reservoirs with an example from the Olkaria field, Kenya. Geothermics, Vol. 19, pp. 497-514. Arnórsson, S., D Amore, F., and Gerardo, J. (2). Isotopic and chemical techniques in geothermal exploration (Ed. S. Arnórsson). Vienna, Intern. Atomic Energy Agency, 351pp. Arnórsson, S., Fridriksson, Th., and Gunnarsson, I. (1998). Gas chemistry of the Krafla geothermal field, Iceland. In: Proc. International Symposium on Water-Rock Interaction, Auckland, New Zealand, pp. 613-616. 28 26 24 22 well21 S7 Paper117 Page 35

International Geothermal Conference, Reykjavík, Sept. 23 Session #7 Arnórsson, S., Gunnlaugsson, E. and Svavarsson, H. (1983). The chemistry of geothermal waters in Iceland. III. Chemical geothermometry in geothermal investigations. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, Vol. 47, pp. 567-577. D Amore, F. and Celati, C. (1983). Methodology for calculating steam quality in geothermal reservoirs. Geothermics, Vol. 12, pp. 129-14. Fournier, R.O. and Potter, R.W. (1982). A revised and expanded silica (quartz) geothermometer. Geotherm. Resour. Council Bull., Vol. 11, pp. 3-9. Giggenbach, W. F. (198). Geothermal gas equilibria. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta Vol. 44, pp. 221-232 Giggenbach, W. F. (1981). Geothermal mineral equilibria. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta Vol. 45, pp. 393-41. Giggenbach, W.F. (1991). Chemical techniques in geothermal exploration. Application of Geochemistry in Geothermal Reservoir Development. (Ed. F. D'Amore) UNITAR/UNDP Centre on Small Energy Resources, Rome, pp. 119-144. Gudmundsson, B.Th. and Arnórsson, S. (22). Geochemical monitoring of the Krafla and Námafjall geothermal areas, N-Iceland. Geothermics, Vol. 31, pp. 195-243. Manning, C.E. (1994). The solubility of quartz in H 2 O in the lower crust and upper mantle. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, Vol. 58, pp. 4831-4839. Rimstidt, J.D. (1997). Quartz solubility at low temperatures. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, Vol. 61, pp. 2553-2558. S7 Paper117 Page 36