AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION ST HELENS UDP BIRCH TREE FARM (SITE 33)

Similar documents
STATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS REPORT FOR WELLINGTON, HEREFORD AND WORCESTER MINERALS LOCAL PLAN

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION BROMSGROVE DISTRICT LOCAL PLAN - SITE 1358/ BUNTSFORD HILL

MAFF Ministry of IfiriLE Agriculture Fisheries and Food

The Soils and Land Capability for Agriculture. Land North of Aberdeen, Aberdeenshire

Introduction to Soil Science and Wetlands Kids at Wilderness Camp

Preliminary soil survey of the NATL Old Field Plots

Nea Farm, Somerley, Hampshire

The Assessment of Flood Risk for Proposed Development Sites at Holyport

Soil Formation. Lesson Plan: NRES B2-4

Unit E: Basic Principles of Soil Science. Lesson 2: Understanding Soil Formation

Bachelor of Biosystems Technology Faculty of Technology South Eastern University of Sri Lanka

Environmental Impact Report for the proposed establishment of a New Coal-Fired Power Station in the Lephalale Area, Limpopo Province

Hydrogeological Assessment for Part of Lots 2 and 3, Concession 5, Township of Thurlow, County of Hastings 1.0 INTRODUCTION. 1.

Soil Surveys. What are the most important properties to consider in a taxonomic system used for making a soil survey?

4. Soils and soil conditions

Custom Soil Resource Report for Forrest County, Mississippi

Appendix 2b. NRCS Soil Survey

The potential of GIS in mapping soil health. Tim Brewer 19/11/2104

UNDP HARARE HOSPITAL PROPOSED NATPHARM WAREHOUSE

Clay Robinson, PhD, CPSS, PG copyright 2009

Geophysical Survey Report

16 January 2018 Job Number: RICHARD NEWMAN C\- CLARK FORTUNE MCDONALD AND ASSOCIATES PO BOX 553 QUEENSTOWN

CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURAL PR OPERTIES, IN C. GALE RANCH

RALPH SIMMONS STATE FOREST 2016 LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN EXHIBITS

PURPOSE To develop a strategy for deriving a map of functional soil water characteristics based on easily obtainable land surface observations.

Appendix D. Sediment Texture and Other Soil Data

What Is Water Erosion? Aren t they the same thing? What Is Sediment? What Is Sedimentation? How can Sediment Yields be Minimized?

Soil Map Boulder County Area, Colorado (Planet Blue Grass) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Which map shows the stream drainage pattern that most likely formed on the surface of this volcano? A) B)

Hydric Rating by Map Unit Ocean County, New Jersey (Larsen & N New Prospect Jackson Twp., NJ)

A D A S ^ PITHOUSE WEST O.C.C.S. Extensioi Topsoil Resource Map SCALE-1-.5, I I Metres. Soil Thickness(cm.) Soil Texture.

GPS and GIS use in Soil Mapping of The Sugarcane Industry. Lancelot H. White. Sugar Industry Research Institute

On-Site Soils Investigation. Buttermilk Way Storm water Treatment Project Buzzards Bay. MA. February 28 th, 2012

Aldo Ferrero, Francesco Vidotto, Fernando De Palo. RUNOFF team

3.3 CLIMATE, GEOLOGY, TOPOGRAPHY, AND SOILS CLIMATE GEOLOGY TOPOGRAPHY

Soil Map Polk County, Florida

Communicating Climate Change Consequences for Land Use

APPENDIX H SOIL SURVEY

Soil is formed from the weathering of rocks. Weathering: the breaking down of parent material (rock). There are 3 types of weathering:

Assessment of Ground Water in a Part of Coastal West Bengal using Geo-Electrical Method

IMPORTANCE OF GEOLOGIC CHARACTERIZATION FOR LEVEE FOUNDATION AND BORROW MATERIALS AS STUDIED AT THE INDIAN GRAVES LEVEE DISTRICT, ADAMS COUNTY, IL

Impact of the Danube River on the groundwater dynamics in the Kozloduy Lowland

Environmental Scoping Report for the proposed establishment of a New Coal-Fired Power Station in the Lephalale Area, Limpopo Province

MEMORANDUM. wa.tsr..-z.n~.e.s-t.i~at.i.o.ns... Branch... Mr. Webster contends that prior to excavation of the gravel

Rocks and Weathering

' International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement. 2 Groundwater Investigations. N.A. de Ridder'? 2.1 Introduction. 2.

Hydric Rating by Map Unit Harrison County, Mississippi 30 27' 27'' 30 26' 57''

Evaluation/Monitoring Report No. 152

Maggie Payne Jim Turenne

The future of the Lowland Belizean Savannas?.

Subject Name: SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION ENGINEERING 3(2+1) COURSE OUTLINE

Jim Turenne. Soils on Social Media

Identification of Rapid Response

GEOLOGY OF TODMORDEN MOOR 2 BACKGROUND

UGRC 144 Science and Technology in Our Lives/Geohazards

Soil Erosion Calculation using Remote Sensing and GIS in Río Grande de Arecibo Watershed, Puerto Rico

Evaluation/Monitoring Report No. 259

Envrionmental impact assessment of urban development plan by vulnerability model application

patersongroup Consulting Engineers April 20, 2010 File: PG1887-LET.01R Novatech Engineering Consultants Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive

FORM A GEOGRAPHY 1114 LABORATORY FINAL EXAM Teaching Assistant SAMPLE Lab Meeting. Place all answers on the answer sheet; 2 points per question

Geostatistical Analysis of Rainfall Temperature and Evaporation Data of Owerri for Ten Years

Italian experience with the interpretation of FOCUS surface water scenarios from a regulatory point of view

Chapter 2. Regional Landscapes and the Hydrologic Cycle

Mark Scheme (Results) Summer 2007

INTRODUCTION Water resources are vitally important for the future of humankind. Groundwater from karst aquifers is among the most important drinking w

K Design Graphs and Charts for Raft Foundations Spanning Local Depressions

Hydrology and Hydraulics Design Report. Background Summary

INTRODUCTION. Previous Study Areas. New Study Area

Lowland Glaciation North Wales

Chapter-3 GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION, CLIMATE AND SOIL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE STUDY SITE

Existing NWS Flash Flood Guidance

MEMORANDUM FOR SWG

Proposed Cemetery Thornhill Road. Tier One Hydrogeological Risk Assessment. Peter Mitchell Associates

Regional offline land surface simulations over eastern Canada using CLASS. Diana Verseghy Climate Research Division Environment Canada

YEAR 7 GEOGRAPHY KNOWLEDGE BOOK

Standards and Procedures for Site Specific Soil Mapping in Rhode Island. Pg 1

Landslides and Ground Water Permeability with Respect to the. Contact Point of Glacial Lake Vermont and the Champlain Sea

Application of SWAT Model to Estimate the Runoff and Sediment Load from the Right Bank Valleys of Mosul Dam Reservoir

Cook Road Ridgeway, South Carolina

Impact : Changes to Existing Topography (Less than Significant)

Analyzing spatial and temporal variation of water balance components in La Vi catchment, Binh Dinh province, Vietnam

Yaneev Golombek, GISP. Merrick/McLaughlin. ESRI International User. July 9, Engineering Architecture Design-Build Surveying GeoSpatial Solutions

O\.OLSSON \ ASSOC I ATES

Custom Soil Resource Report for Palo Verde Area, California

STANDARDIZED DATABASE OF LAND EVALUATION FOR AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION

Noel M. Estwick College of Agriculture and Human Sciences, Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Multnomah County Area, Oregon

Biosphere. All living things, plants, animals, (even you!) are part of the zone of the earth called the biosphere.

Land subsidence due to groundwater withdrawal in Hanoi, Vietnam

Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation for Ponds

How to integrate wetland processes in river basin modeling? A West African case study

Site 3: Park Road, Katikati: field logs, stratigraphic description, and site description

ARCH 1250 APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Geophysical Survey. Ballymount Co. Dublin. Licence Ref. 02R029. By John Nicholls Margaret Gowen & Co. Ltd. For LRT

Document Reference: /2014

Unit 3 Rocks, Minerals, Soil Twitter Review Questions

Hydric Rating by Map Unit Harrison County, Mississippi

Presented at the FIG Working Week 2017, May 29 - June 2, 2017 in Helsinki, Finland. Denny LUMBAN RAJA Adang SAPUTRA Johannes ANHORN

Correlation of unified and AASHTO soil classification systems for soils classification

Map Name(s) and Date(s) Historical Map - Segment A13. Order Details. Site Details 459 Dover Road, Walmer, DEAL, Kent, CT14 7PG. Customer Ref: 28927

Transcription:

/ ' '' / / AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION ST HELENS UDP BIRCH TREE FARM (SITE 33) R D Metcalfe Resource Planning Team ADAS Statutory Group WOLVERHAMPTON ADAS Ref: Job No: MAFFRef: 25/RPT/D689 135/95 EL 25/10752 noxitll/aiaiioe

AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION REPORT FOR ST HELENS UDP BIRCH TREE FARM (SITE 33) 1 SUMMARY 1.1 The Agricultural Land Classification (ALC) Survey for this site shows that the following proportions of ALC grades are present: Grade/Subgrade 2 3a 3b Other land Agricultural buildmgs Water Urban ha 0.7 0.5 0. 0. % of site 32 2 1.2 The main limitation to the agricultural use of land in Grade 2 is soil droughtiness. 1.3 The main limitation to the agricultural use of land in Subgrades 3a and 3b is soil wetness. 2 INTRODUCTION 2.1 The site was surveyed by the Resource Planning Team in February 1995. An Agricultural Land Classification survey was undertaken according to the guidelines laid down in the "Agricultural Land Classification of England and Wales - Revised Guidelines and Criteria for Grading the Quality of Agricultural Land" (MAFF 1988). 2.2 The 2.2 ha site is situated to the north of St. Helens and the A580 (T) road. The land immediately to the north, and west ofthe site is predominantly in agricultural use. The eastem boundary adjoins housing, and the southem one rough ground. 2.3 The survey was requested by MAFF in connection with the St. Helens UDP. 2. At MAFF Land Use Planning Unit's request this was a detailed grid survey at 1:10000 with a minimum auger boring density of 1 per hectare. The attached map is only accurate at the base map scale and any enlargement would be misleading. 2.5 At the time ofthe survey the site was either under grass or ploughed. taaite3t3fnin5/je

3 CLIMATE 3.1 The following interpolated data are relevant for the site (SJ 508 977) : Average Annual Rainfall (mm) 898 Accumulated Temperature above 0**C January to June (day *'C) 1 3.2 There is no overall climatic limitation on the site 3.3 Other relevant data for classifying land include: SITE Field Capacity Days (days) 211 Moisture Deficit Wheat (mm) 81 Moisture Deficit Potatoes (mm) 66.1 Three site factors of gradient, micro relief andfloodingare considered when classifying land..2 At the time of the survey there was evidence of recent flooding on land adjoining Rainford Brook. This is considered in the grading ofthe land. 5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 5.1 The solid geology of the area is comprised of I^wer Coal Measures - British Geologicai Survey Sheet 8 Wigan 1:63 360. This is overlain with deposits of alluvium and sand. 5.2 The underlying geology influences the soils which have a sandy texture. aaktt33/matvje

6 AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION 6.1 Grade 2 - occupies 0.7 ha (32%) ofthe survey area and is found in the eastem part of the site. 6.1.1 These soils typically have a sandy loam texture overlying loamy sand and sand to depth, with few or no stones within the profile. The moisture balance places these soils into Grade 2. 6.1.2 The main limitation to the agricultural use of this land is soil droughtiness. 6.2 Subgrade 3a - occupies 0.5 ha (2%) ofthe survey area and is found in the south westem part ofthe site. 6.2.1 The soil has loamy sand texture over sandy clay loam with few or no stones within the profile. Observations of gleying place the soil in Wetness Class II. 6.2.2 The main limitation to the agricultural use of this land is soil wetness. 6.3 Subgrade 3b - occupies 0. ha (%) ofthe survey area and is found in a depression close to Rainford Brook. 6.3.1 The soil typically has a loamy sand texture overlying clay at 8cm. Observations of gleying and the depth to the slowly permeable layer places the soil in Wetness Class IV. At the time of the survey there was evidence of recent winter flooding. 6.3.2 The main limitation to the agricultural use of this land is soil wetness. 6. Other land includes agricultural buildings which occupy 0. ha (%) ofthe survey area and are found at the eastem boundary of the site; non-agricultural land (tall ruderal) occupying ha (%) ofthe site, water (small pond) occupying ha (%) ofthe site. BBate33/nm5/je

6 5 SUMMARY OF AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION GRADES Grade/Sub-grade Area in Hectares % of Survey Area % of Agricultural Land 2 3a 3b Other land Agricultural Buildings Water Non-Agricultural 0.7 0.5 0. 0. 32 2 31 25 - Totals 2.2 100 100 nbatc33/nmyje