Example Sheet 6. Infinite and Improper Integrals

Similar documents
Sections 5.2: The Definite Integral

5.7 Improper Integrals

Lecture 3 ( ) (translated and slightly adapted from lecture notes by Martin Klazar)

Lecture 1. Functional series. Pointwise and uniform convergence.

MAA 4212 Improper Integrals

11 An introduction to Riemann Integration

Definite integral. Mathematics FRDIS MENDELU

A REVIEW OF CALCULUS CONCEPTS FOR JDEP 384H. Thomas Shores Department of Mathematics University of Nebraska Spring 2007

Chapter 6. Riemann Integral

Definite integral. Mathematics FRDIS MENDELU. Simona Fišnarová (Mendel University) Definite integral MENDELU 1 / 30

1 The Riemann Integral

MATH34032: Green s Functions, Integral Equations and the Calculus of Variations 1

Advanced Calculus: MATH 410 Notes on Integrals and Integrability Professor David Levermore 17 October 2004

Math 554 Integration

Advanced Calculus: MATH 410 Uniform Convergence of Functions Professor David Levermore 11 December 2015

38 Riemann sums and existence of the definite integral.

ASYMPTOTIC BEHAVIOR OF INTERMEDIATE POINTS IN CERTAIN MEAN VALUE THEOREMS. II

UNIFORM CONVERGENCE MA 403: REAL ANALYSIS, INSTRUCTOR: B. V. LIMAYE

7.2 Riemann Integrable Functions

Math& 152 Section Integration by Parts

INTRODUCTION TO INTEGRATION

Integration Techniques

The Regulated and Riemann Integrals

Exam 2, Mathematics 4701, Section ETY6 6:05 pm 7:40 pm, March 31, 2016, IH-1105 Instructor: Attila Máté 1

Best Approximation in the 2-norm

1.2. Linear Variable Coefficient Equations. y + b "! = a y + b " Remark: The case b = 0 and a non-constant can be solved with the same idea as above.

Calculus II: Integrations and Series

Homework 4. (1) If f R[a, b], show that f 3 R[a, b]. If f + (x) = max{f(x), 0}, is f + R[a, b]? Justify your answer.

Entrance Exam, Real Analysis September 1, 2009 Solve exactly 6 out of the 8 problems. Compute the following and justify your computation: lim

1. On some properties of definite integrals. We prove

Improper Integrals, and Differential Equations

Review of Riemann Integral

Properties of Integrals, Indefinite Integrals. Goals: Definition of the Definite Integral Integral Calculations using Antiderivatives

Principles of Real Analysis I Fall VI. Riemann Integration

Unit #9 : Definite Integral Properties; Fundamental Theorem of Calculus

Summary: Method of Separation of Variables

New Expansion and Infinite Series

Polynomial Approximations for the Natural Logarithm and Arctangent Functions. Math 230

Orthogonal Polynomials

The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus

Physics 116C Solution of inhomogeneous ordinary differential equations using Green s functions

Review on Integration (Secs ) Review: Sec Origins of Calculus. Riemann Sums. New functions from old ones.

Phil Wertheimer UMD Math Qualifying Exam Solutions Analysis - January, 2015

A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO UNIFORM CONVERGENCE. In the study of Fourier series, several questions arise naturally, such as: c n e int

Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Differentiating Under the Integral Sign

Improper Integrals. MATH 211, Calculus II. J. Robert Buchanan. Spring Department of Mathematics

Mapping the delta function and other Radon measures

THE EXISTENCE-UNIQUENESS THEOREM FOR FIRST-ORDER DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS.

Handout I - Mathematics II

Review of Calculus, cont d

MATH 409 Advanced Calculus I Lecture 19: Riemann sums. Properties of integrals.

Integrals - Motivation

Complex integration. L3: Cauchy s Theory.

AM1 Mathematical Analysis 1 Oct Feb Exercises Lecture 3. sin(x + h) sin x h cos(x + h) cos x h

II. Integration and Cauchy s Theorem

Week 10: Riemann integral and its properties

Abstract inner product spaces

Riemann Sums and Riemann Integrals

The area under the graph of f and above the x-axis between a and b is denoted by. f(x) dx. π O

The final exam will take place on Friday May 11th from 8am 11am in Evans room 60.

f(x)dx . Show that there 1, 0 < x 1 does not exist a differentiable function g : [ 1, 1] R such that g (x) = f(x) for all

Riemann Sums and Riemann Integrals

Improper Integrals. Type I Improper Integrals How do we evaluate an integral such as

Chapter 6. Infinite series

The Riemann-Lebesgue Lemma

1 2-D Second Order Equations: Separation of Variables

Advanced Calculus I (Math 4209) Martin Bohner

Chapter 8: Methods of Integration

Theoretical foundations of Gaussian quadrature

Integrals along Curves.

Properties of the Riemann Integral

For a continuous function f : [a; b]! R we wish to define the Riemann integral

(4.1) D r v(t) ω(t, v(t))

arxiv:math/ v2 [math.ho] 16 Dec 2003

FINALTERM EXAMINATION 2011 Calculus &. Analytical Geometry-I

The Evaluation Theorem

63. Representation of functions as power series Consider a power series. ( 1) n x 2n for all 1 < x < 1

Solution to HW 4, Ma 1c Prac 2016

Theorems Solutions. Multiple Choice Solutions

Fundamental Theorem of Calculus

Section 5.4 Fundamental Theorem of Calculus 2 Lectures. Dr. Abdulla Eid. College of Science. MATHS 101: Calculus 1

f(t, ε) = o(g(t, ε)) as ε 0

Overview of Calculus I

f(x) dx, If one of these two conditions is not met, we call the integral improper. Our usual definition for the value for the definite integral

UNIFORM CONVERGENCE. Contents 1. Uniform Convergence 1 2. Properties of uniform convergence 3

Riemann is the Mann! (But Lebesgue may besgue to differ.)

a n = 1 58 a n+1 1 = 57a n + 1 a n = 56(a n 1) 57 so 0 a n+1 1, and the required result is true, by induction.

Math 360: A primitive integral and elementary functions

Section 6.1 Definite Integral

Notes on length and conformal metrics

MATH 409 Advanced Calculus I Lecture 22: Improper Riemann integrals.

g i fφdx dx = x i i=1 is a Hilbert space. We shall, henceforth, abuse notation and write g i f(x) = f

Lecture 1: Introduction to integration theory and bounded variation

Introduction to Group Theory

Indefinite Integral. Chapter Integration - reverse of differentiation

REVIEW Chapter 1 The Real Number System

Calculus I-II Review Sheet

MA123, Chapter 10: Formulas for integrals: integrals, antiderivatives, and the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (pp.

MATH 409 Advanced Calculus I Lecture 18: Darboux sums. The Riemann integral.

Taylor Polynomial Inequalities

Transcription:

Sivkumr Exmple Sheet 6 Infinite nd Improper Integrls MATH 5H Mteril presented here is extrcted from Stewrt s text s well s from R. G. Brtle s The elements of rel nlysis. Infinite Integrls: These integrls re lso clled improper integrls of the first kind ; we shll, however, use the term infinite integrls, which is due to the gret British nlyst G. H. Hrdy (877 947). Suppose is fixed rel number, nd tht f is Riemnn integrble on the intervl [, c] for every c >. The infinite integrl of f over [, ) is defined s follows: f(x) := provided the it exists (s finite number). We shll sy tht the infinite integrl does not exist if the foresid it does not exist.. Find ll vlues of the rel number α for which the infinite integrl exist.. Find ll vlues of the rel number α for which the infinite integrl exist. 3. Find ll vlues of the rel number α for which the infinite integrl not exist. e f(x) x α exists/ does not e αx exists/ does not (ln x) α exists/ does x If is fixed rel number nd f is Riemnn integrble on the intervl [b, ] for every b <, then the infinite integrl of f over (, ] is defined s follows: f(x) = b b provided the it exists (s finite number). We sy tht the infinite integrl not exist if the foresid it does not exist. f(x) does We shll sy tht f is loclly Riemnn integrble throughout R if the definite integrl µ λ f(x) exists for every pir of rel numbers λ nd µ. 4. Suppose tht f is loclly Riemnn integrble throughout R. Prove the following sttements: (i) If the infinite integrl rel number. f(x) exists for some rel number, then it exists for every

(ii) If the infinite integrl f(x) exists for some rel number, then it exists for every rel number. Suppose f if loclly Riemnn integrble throughout R, nd ssume tht ech of the infinite integrls f(x) nd f(x) exists for some vlue of. We define the infinite integrl of f over (, ) s their sum, nmely: f(x) := f(x) + f(x) = b b f(x) + f(x). (6.) The existence of both its in the definition bove implies the existence of the it [ ] f(x) + f(x) = (6.) c c nd the equlity of the its in (6.) nd (6.). On the other hnd, it is possible to consider only the specil kind of symmetric it given in (6.). Indeed, when this it in (6.) exists (regrdless of whether the it(s) in (6.) exist), we cll it the Cuchy Principl Vlue of the infinite integrl of f over (, ), nd denote it by (CPV) f(x). As noted erlier, if the infinite integrl of f over (, ) exists (tht is, (6.) exists s finite number), then tht number is lso the CPV of the infinite integrl of f over (, ). However, the converse is flse in generl: 5. Give n exmple of function f which stisfies ech of the following properties: (i) f is loclly Riemnn integrble throughout R, (ii) (CPV) f(x) does not exist. integrl is, in generl, weker requirement. f(x) exists, nd (iii) the infinite integrl This shows tht the existence of the Cuchy Principl Vlue Theorem (Comprison Test). Suppose is fixed rel number. Assume tht f nd g re continuous functions with f(x) g(x) for every x. The following hold: (i) If the infinite integrl g(x). (ii) If the infinite integrl f(x) does not exist, then neither does the infinite integrl g(x) exists, then so does the infinite integrl f(x). Theorem (Limit Comprison Test). Suppose is fixed rel number. Assume tht f nd g re continuous functions with f(x) nd g(x) > for every x. If f(x) x g(x) = L >,

then both or neither of the infinite integrls 6. Determine whether the following infinite integrls exist: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) x 3 + x x + 3x 3 + x + 5x + x 5 + x + (x ) x 5/ + x + 3 g(x) exist. Improper Integrls: These re sometimes clled improper integrls of the second kind. Suppose [, b] is closed bounded intervl. Let f be function which is defined t lest for x stisfying < x b, nd ssume tht f is Riemnn integrble on [c, b] for every < c < b. The improper integrl of f over [, b] is defined s follows: f(x) := c + c provided the it exists. Entirely nlogously, if f is defined for every x < b nd is Riemnn integrble on [, c] for every < c < b, then the improper integrl of f over [, b] is defined by provided the it exists. f(x) := c b 7. Find the vlues of the rel number α such tht the integrl 8. Study (the importnt) Exmple 8 on Pge 55 in Stewrt s text. 9. Suppose n is positive integer. (i) Show tht (ln x) n = n (ln x) n. x α exists/does not exist. (ii) Deduce tht (ln x) n = ( ) n n!. Suppose now tht p is n interior point of the intervl [, b], tht is, < p < b. Assume tht f is defined t every point of [, b] except perhps t p. If both the improper integrls 3 p f(x) nd

p f(x) exist, then we define the improper integrl of f over [, b] s their sum. In terms of its, we hve: f(x) := ɛ + p ɛ f(x) + f(x). (6.3) δ + p+δ As in the cse of infinite integrls, the existence of both its in (6.3) implies the existence of the symmetric it [ p ɛ ] b f(x) + f(x). (6.4) ɛ + p+ɛ On the other hnd, if we only require the symmetric it in (6.4) to exist (regrdless of (6.3)), we obtin the Cuchy Principl Vlue of the improper integrl of f over [, b], nd denote it by (CPV) f(x). Once gin, existence of the CPV of the improper integrl is weker requirement (vide infr):. Give n exmple of function f stisfying ech of the following conditions: (i) f is defined nd continuous on [, ) (, ], (ii) (CPV) f(x) does not exist. f(x) exists, nd (iii) the improper integrl Lplce Trnsforms: The next pir of exmples feture infinite integrls which re known s Lplce Trnsforms. A more detiled tretment of this mteril wits you in course on Differentil Equtions.. Suppose s > nd ω re fixed rel numbers. (i) Show tht the infinite integrl (ii) Evlute the infinite integrl in (i). e st cos(ωt) dt exists.. Suppose s > is fixed, nd let n be positive integer. (i) Show tht the infinite integrl (ii) Show tht (iii) Deduce tht e st t n dt exists. e st t n dt = n s e st t n dt = n! s n+. e st t n dt. A two for one del: The following exmple presents n integrl which is both infinite nd improper. 4

3. Consider the integrl x x 4. which is infinite s well s improper. Evlute it by doing the following: (i) Express the integrl s the sum of two integrls: x x 4 + x x 4. (ii) Compute ech of the two integrls. Note tht the first of the two is n improper integrl, whilst the second is n infinite one. 5